Interactions Among a Soil Organic Amendment, Nematodes, and the Nematode-Trapping Fungus Dactylellina candidum

Nematode-Suppressive Potential of Digestates to Meloidogyne incognita and Heterodera schachtii

Management of plant-parasitic nematodes uses host plant resistance, crop rotation, cultural methods, and nematicide applications. Host plant resistance is tedious to develop, and crop rotation and cultural methods are challenging to use. Environmental and human health concerns render sole reliance on chemical nematode suppression nonsustainable. Previously, digestate from anaerobically fermented maize silage suppressed Heterodera schachtii in Beta vulgaris crops. Here, seven digestates were investigated for nematode suppressive potential: liquid dairy manure digestate (LDMD), liquid dairy manure digestate with ammonia removed (LDMDA-), food waste digestate (FWD), liquid food waste digestate with ammonia removed (LFWDA-), liquid food waste digestate (LFWD), food waste hydrolysate from the Renewable Energy Anaerobic Digester (HREAD), and food waste hydrolysate from the South Area Transfer Station in Sacramento (HSATS). In a red radish (Raphanus sativus) bioassay with H. schachtii, digestates were amended at rates of 0.02, 0.11, 0.57, and 2.86 ml per 100 cm3 of soil. At a rate of 2.86 ml, all amendments except LDMDA- and LFWDA- significantly reduced juvenile root penetration compared with the infested control. In a greenhouse watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) bioassay with Meloidogyne incognita, amendments FWD, LFWD, HREAD, and HSATS as well as LDMD (less effectively) at 2.86 and 5.76 ml per 100 cm3 of soil significantly reduced egg masses per root system compared with the nontreated, nematode-infested control. In a microplot experiment with M. incognita and red radish, in the treatment amended with LFWD at 2.37 ml per 100 cm3 of soil, marketable yields were improved by approximately 50% over the nontreated control and were comparable with those in the treatment with the nematicide Reklemel. In a second microplot experiment with M. incognita and watermelon, treatments that contained LFWD at rates of 3.55 ml per 100 cm3 of soil had transient numerical effects of initial nematode suppression that were not maintained throughout the 3-month growth period. The results of these studies demonstrated that digestates FWD and LFWD consistently expressed some nematode-suppressive capacity.

Suppressiveness of Soil Amendments with Pelleted Plant Materials on the Root-knot Nematode Meloidogyne Incognita

Soil treatments with formulated plant biomasses or waste materials can be an effective alternative to green manure crops for a sustainable management of root-knot nematode infestations. The suppressive performance of soil amendments with three commercial formulations of defatted seed meal from Brassica carinata, dry biomass of Medicago sativa and pressed pulp from Beta vulgaris was comparatively evaluated on the root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita both on potted and field tomato (cv. Regina) trials. Products were applied at rates of 10, 20, 30 or 40 g/kg and 20 and 40 T/ ha soil in pots and field, respectively. Soil non treated or treated with the nematicide Oxamyl were used as controls in both experiments. Amendments in potted soil significantly reduced M. incognita infestation on tomato roots compared to both the untreated control and treatment with Oxamyl, also increasing tomato plant growth up to the 30 g/kg soil rate. At the end of the field tomato crop, soil population density of M. incognita resulted significantly reduced by all the tested treatments, whereas tomato yield was significantly higher than the untreated control only at the lowest amendment rate. Soil amendments with the materials tested in this study demonstrated to be a potential additional tool for a satisfactory and safe management of root-knot nematodes.

Activity of Saponins from Medicago Species against Phytoparasitic Nematodes

Content of bioactive saponins of Medicago species suggests that they may also exert, as previously demonstrated on M. sativa, nematicidal properties exploitable for the formulation of new products for sustainable phytoparasitic nematode management. This study was addressed to highlight the bioactivity of saponins from five different Medicago species still poorly known for their biological efficacy, i.e., M. heyniana, M. hybrida, M. lupulina, M. murex and M. truncatula, against the plant parasitic nematodes Meloidogyne incognita, Xiphinema index and Globodera rostochiensis. The bioactivity of the extracts from the five Medicago species was assessed by in vitro assays on the juveniles (J2) and eggs of M. incognita and G. rostochiensis and the adult females of X. index. The suppressiveness to M. incognita of soil treatments with the Medicago plant biomasses was also investigated in a tomato experiment. The nematicidal activity of the five Medicago species was reported and discussed in relation to their phytochemical profile.

Consortia of anti-nematode fungi and bacteria in the rhizosphere of soybean plants attacked by root-knot nematodes

Cyst and root-knot nematodes are major risk factors of agroecosystem management, often causing devastating impacts on crop production. The use of microbes that parasitize or prey on nematodes has been considered as a promising approach for suppressing phytopathogenic nematode populations. However, effects and persistence of those biological control agents often vary substantially depending on regions, soil characteristics and agricultural practices: more insights into microbial community processes are required to develop reproducible control of nematode populations. By performing high-throughput sequencing profiling of bacteria and fungi, we examined how root and soil microbiomes differ between benign and nematode-infected plant individuals in a soybean field in Japan. Results indicated that various taxonomic groups of bacteria and fungi occurred preferentially on the soybean individuals infected by root-knot nematodes or those uninfected by nematodes. Based on a network analysis of potential microbe-microbe associations, we further found that several fungal taxa potentially preying on nematodes (Dactylellina (Orbiliales), Rhizophydium (Rhizophydiales), Clonostachys (Hypocreales), Pochonia (Hypocreales) and Purpureocillium (Hypocreales)) co-occurred in the soybean rhizosphere at a small spatial scale. This study suggests how 'consortia' of anti-nematode microbes can derive from indigenous (resident) microbiomes, providing basic information for managing anti-nematode microbial communities in agroecosystems.

Response of nematode-trapping fungi to organic substrates in a coastal grassland soil

To understand why Arthrobotrys oligospora and other nematode-trapping fungi are common and sometimes abundant in the coastal grassland soils of the Bodega Marine Reserve (BMR, Sonoma County, CA), we examined how resident trapping fungi responded to the addition of eight organic substrates (lupine leaves, grass leaves, dead isopods, dead moth larvae, isopod faeces, deer faeces, shrimp shells, and powdered chitin). We were especially interested in the effects of dead isopods because isopods are abundant at BMR and because previous studies had documented strong responses of A. oligospora to other arthropods (dead moth larvae). Soil from BMR was packed into vials (40 g dry mass equivalent per vial with water potential at -230 kPa and bulk density at 0.9 gcm(-3)), and one substrate or no substrate was added to the soil surface. After 30 d at 20 degrees C, trapping fungi were quantified by dilution plating and most probable number procedures. The response of A. oligospora was inversely related to substrate carbon:nitrogen (C:N) ratio: substrates with low C:N ratios (dead isopods, lupine leaves, dead moth larvae) usually caused large increases in A. oligospora whereas those with higher C:N ratios (isopod faeces, deer faeces, grass leaves) did not. An exception was chitin powder, which had a low C:N ratio, but which did not cause A. oligospora to proliferate. Responses of A. oligospora were directly related to the quantity of nitrogen added with each substrate, and those substrates that caused large increases in resident nematodes usually caused large increases in A. oligospora. Other trapping fungi did not respond as strongly as A. oligospora.