The COVID-19 pandemic as a catalyst for medical education innovation: A learner's perspective

A Clinically Immersive Medical Innovation Program for US MD Students: Curricular Description and Program Outcomes

Background

There is growing need for physician-innovators to address the mounting challenges within the US healthcare system. Despite this, there remains a significant gap in understanding of the efficacy of innovation programs for US MD candidates. We present initial program outcomes of a novel, clinically immersive medical innovation program offered to MD candidates at the David Geffen School of Medicine (DGSOM) at UCLA.

Methods

A novel clinically immersive medical innovation curriculum was developed based on existing and reputable medical innovation frameworks and tailored for medical students. Curricular topics broadly included clinical ethnography, interviewing techniques, mind mapping, needs formulation and prioritization, quality improvement, intellectual property, reimbursement pathways, solution landscaping and prioritization, regulatory processes. The program was trialed during an unscheduled summer with voluntary enrollees from DGSOM Class of 2024. The traditional four-level Kirkpatrick model was employed to assess program outcomes.

Results

Program outcomes were positive on all four Kirkpatrick levels. Students rated enjoyment at 9.5/10 for lectures and 9.1/10 for clinical immersion. Student-perceived confidence in key skills increased by 43%, and 75% of faculty directly perceived improvement in ethnographic skills. Students were highly engaged in both didactics and clinical immersion, discovering on average 2.6 faculty-verified needs per week. Faculty largely felt their students discovered important unmet clinical needs and added value to their clinical practice.

Conclusion

We developed and trialed a novel clinically immersive medical innovation curriculum tailored for medical students. This program achieved positive outcomes on all four levels of the Kirkpatrick model. Our findings have driven the local adoption of this program into our institution's medical school curriculum. We hope that the program efficacy demonstrated herein catalyzes more institutions to trial similar medical innovation programs.

A Comparison of Physical Therapist Educational Outcomes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare educational outcomes of Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) graduates before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Reports show increased stress, anxiety, and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have negatively affected academic performance. Historically, academic performance is predictive of National Physical Therapy Examination (NPTE) scores. Yet, there is little evidence analyzing student outcomes during the pandemic.

SUBJECTS

Doctor of Physical Therapy graduate records (N = 1,897) were retrospectively collected from a multicenter convenience sample consisting of 5 blended programs. Records were sampled from existing "prepandemic" graduates of Fall 2018-2019 (n = 988) and "pandemic" graduates of Fall 2021-2022 (n = 909).

METHODS

A causal comparative and correlational study design was used. Grade point average (GPA) and NPTE scores were collected. A general linear model examined differences between groups, and a multiple linear regression examined predictors of NPTE performance.

RESULTS

Grade point average was a significant predictor of NPTE score (r2 = 0.56; P < .01) for the overall sample and for the prepandemic and pandemic cohorts (r2 = 0.38, P < .01; r2 = 0.45, P < .01, respectively). Grade point average was not significantly different between the groups (P = .09), nor did it significantly influence differences in NPTE scores (P = .13). Pandemic graduates displayed a significantly lower NPTE pass rate (85.1%) compared with prepandemic graduates (89.7%; P < .01). Pandemic graduates experienced higher rates of academic difficulty (20%; P < .01) and had a approximately 5 times higher likelihood of not passing the NPTE.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

This is the first study to report on DPT graduate outcomes spanning the COVID-19 pandemic. Similar to previous studies, GPA remained the most significant predictor of NPTE scores. Pandemic graduates demonstrated significantly lower NPTE scores and higher rates of academic difficulty (GPA < 3.0). Continued monitoring of NPTE performance is warranted between prepandemic, pandemic, and postpandemic cohorts across modes of program delivery.

Digital Versus Conventional Teaching of Surgical Pathology: A Comparative Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the digital method and the conventional method of teaching surgical pathology to medical students.

METHODS

A prospective case-control study was conducted on second-year students during the period of August 20, 2022, through January 15, 2023. Students, divided into two groups of 45 each, were taught surgical pathology via both conventional and digital methods. Four specimens and four slides were taught in total to the same set of students. A pre-test and a post-test were used to evaluate students' performance and the impact of the teaching method. The answers were analyzed using a paired t-test. In the end, students' responses were obtained regarding their views on a better method of teaching on a Likert scale.

RESULTS

To study gross pathology, 50.7% of students were in favor of the digital method, and 21% were not in favor. For the microscopic examination of tissues, 56.92% of students were in favor of the digital method, and 15% were not in favor. There was a significant increase in post-test scores (12.54-9.79 = 2.75, p=0.007) when digital methods for teaching surgical pathology were applied.

CONCLUSION

The Likert scale demonstrated that the digital method of teaching surgical pathology not only improved student performance but also resulted in a better understanding of the subject.

Attitudes toward Virtual Admissions Interviews among Applicants to a Veterinary School

Virtual interviews have gradually begun to be utilized in health professions education; however, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in virtual interviews rapidly becoming commonplace for the 2020-2021 admissions cycle. This study aimed to evaluate attitudes toward and experience with virtual interviews of applicants to a veterinary medical college. All applicants to the Midwestern University College of Veterinary Medicine (MWU-CVM) were provided with a link to a voluntary, anonymous survey after completing a virtual interview with the program. A 27.5% response rate (114/415) was obtained. Responses indicate widespread acceptance of virtual interviews, with respondents noting they would be more likely to interview for an out-of-state program with a virtual interview option and most feeling more positively about the program after their virtual interview. In-person interviews were preferred by 62.3% of applicants, while 32.5% favored a virtual option. Most applicants (58.8%) applied to more than six schools, indicating a major burden of cost and time associated with veterinary college applications. Students who experienced technical difficulties were less likely to feel positively about the interview (p = .01). Overall, virtual interviews were viewed favorably by applicants, although many indicated a preference for an in-person interview when possible. Prioritizing an accessible technology platform and high-quality sound input/output for interviewers may help foster a more positive virtual interview for applicants. Virtual interviews are a viable option for veterinary admissions interviews associated with a positive applicant experience.

Zooming into the COVID Era Together

The pre-clinical medical school curriculum provides students with extraordinary experiences in preparation to become physicians. However, it was not originally designed to be delivered remotely. The COVID-19 pandemic promptly threw the medical education process into unforeseen circumstances. A model of student-faculty collaboration created to address new challenges and implement practical solutions rapidly is presented. This model was used effectively to respond to pre-clinical educational interruptions that were imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic and maintain high-quality training. Our experience provides valuable insights and lessons learned that can be applied to the ongoing pandemic response and to future educational challenges.

A Graphic Transformation: A Qualitative Study of Transformative Learning in Medical Trainees during COVID-19 Using Comics as Data Presentation

Phenomenon: Transformative learning is a theory in which individuals construct new or revised interpretations of the meaning of an experience. COVID-19 offers a rare opportunity to better understand how individuals respond to and make meaning within the shared context of an extraordinary event. We aimed to examine if and how residents and fellows engaged in transformative learning when caring for COVID-19 positive patients during the initial peak of the pandemic (Spring 2020).Approach: We conducted an interpretive qualitative study to identify themes pertaining to transformative learning. We used semi-structured interviews of residents and fellows who were directly or indirectly involved in the care of COVID-19 positive patients admitted to the inpatient wards or the intensive care units during the first peak of the pandemic (defined as March 11th - May 28th, 2020) at our Mid-Atlantic academic health system. We used the medium of comics to depict select interviewees' experiences during the pandemic as a novel way to represent themes from the interviews.Findings: Three main themes arose from our qualitative analysis. These included "a sense of guilt," "the impact on training," and "venues and processes for reflection." In comparing their experiences with colleagues and friends at other institutions with higher COVID-19 case volume, trainees reflected on how they felt lucky, and this led to guilt, although not necessarily transformation. The impact of COVID-19 on the training environment had transformative potential. Trainees challenged their previously held assumptions on the necessity of various surgeries, in-person visits, and physical examination maneuvers when COVID-19 posed a barrier. Finally, while trainees recalled multiple situations throughout the pandemic when they believed they were engaging in reflection, such reflection did not appear to reach so deep as to alter participants' underlying assumptions until the research interview itself, suggesting that transformation was incomplete.Insights: Our purposive sample of residents and fellows who cared for COVID-19 positive patients during the initial peak of the pandemic made meaning of their experience in multiple ways. The largest shift in worldview due to the pandemic appeared to be related to the instrumental utility of certain common medical practices or procedures. This, in turn, was the most prominent influence on how these trainees felt they would practice in the future, and translated to a shift in how they appraised evidence. However, lack of opportunity for reflection may have adversely impacted the ability for transformation to take place. Given that multiple trainees showed appreciation for the critical reflection venue that was the research interview, academic leadership should ensure similar venues exist during training, even after the pandemic ends.

Coaching interventions among healthcare students in tertiary education to improve mental well-being: A mixed studies review

OBJECTIVES

To consolidate the available evidence regarding healthcare students' experiences of coaching interventions' effect on their mental well-being in tertiary educational institutions.

DESIGN

A mixed studies review.

DATA SOURCES

Seven electronic databases were searched for relevant studies from their inception dates until July 2021: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

REVIEW METHODS

This review observed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and was guided by Pluye and Hong's (2014) framework for mixed studies review. Quality appraisal of included studies was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A convergent qualitative synthesis design for mixed studies reviews was adopted to analyze all findings and thematic analysis was conducted according to Braun and Clarke's (2006) framework.

RESULTS

Three themes and seven subthemes are generated from the 12 included studies. The main themes are: 1) Receiving much-needed help, 2) Unlocking the secrets of success, and 3) Way forward for coaching in healthcare education.

CONCLUSIONS

Many students benefited from the coaching interventions in terms of academic, emotional and psychological support and received guidance in professional development. However, careful preparation of both coaches and students is needed to improve the success of coaching interventions. Future coaching interventions could incorporate both group and individual sessions, assign students to coaches based on their clinical interests and consider conducting online coaching sessions using video calls. Improvement of study rigor would be required to achieve more accurate results. Lastly, future studies should be conducted on healthcare students of more diverse disciplines and cultures to increase results' generalizability.