The importance of genetics for the optimization of radiation therapy. A hypothesis

Radiation biology and oncology in the genomic era

Radiobiology research is building the foundation for applying genomics in precision radiation oncology. Advances in high-throughput approaches will underpin increased understanding of radiosensitivity and the development of future predictive assays for clinical application. There is an established contribution of genetics as a risk factor for radiotherapy side effects. An individual's radiosensitivity is an inherited polygenic trait with an architecture that includes rare mutations in a few genes that confer large effects and common variants in many genes with small effects. Current thinking is that some will be tissue specific, and future tests will be tailored to the normal tissues at risk. The relationship between normal and tumor cell radiosensitivity is poorly understood. Data are emerging suggesting interplay between germline genetic variation and epigenetic modification with growing evidence that changes in DNA methylation regulate the radiosensitivity of cancer cells and histone acetyltransferase inhibitors have radiosensitizing effects. Changes in histone methylation can also impair DNA damage response signaling and alter radiosensitivity. An important effort to advance radiobiology in the genomic era was establishment of the Radiogenomics Consortium to enable the creation of the large radiotherapy cohorts required to exploit advances in genomics. To address challenges in harmonizing data from multiple cohorts, the consortium established the REQUITE project to collect standardized data and genotyping for ~5,000 patients. The collection of detailed dosimetric data is important to produce validated multivariable models. Continued efforts will identify new genes that impact on radiosensitivity to generate new knowledge on toxicity pathogenesis and tests to incorporate into the clinical decision-making process.

A prospective study on histone γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci expression in rectal carcinoma patients: correlation with radiation therapy-induced outcome

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of histone γ-H2AX and 53BP1 proteins to predict the radiotherapy (RT) outcome of patients with rectal carcinoma (RC) was evaluated in a prospective study. High expression of the constitutive histone γ-H2AX is indicative of defective DNA repair pathway and/or genomic instability, whereas 53BP1 (p53-binding protein 1) is a conserved checkpoint protein with properties of a DNA double-strand breaks sensor.

METHODS

Using fluorescence microscopy, we assessed spontaneous and radiation-induced foci of γ-H2AX and 53BP1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from unselected RC patients (n = 53) undergoing neoadjuvant chemo- and RT. Cells from apparently healthy donors (n = 12) served as references.

RESULTS

The γ-H2AX assay of in vitro irradiated lymphocytes revealed significantly higher degree of DNA damage in the group of unselected RC patients with respect to the background, initial (0.5 Gy, 30 min) and residual (0.5 Gy and 2 Gy, 24 h post-radiation) damage compared to the control group. Likewise, the numbers of 53BP1 foci analyzed in the samples from 46 RC patients were significantly higher than in controls except for the background DNA damage. However, both markers were not able to predict tumor stage, gastrointestinal toxicity or tumor regression after curative RT. Interestingly, the mean baseline and induced DNA damage was found to be lower in the group of RC patients with tumor stage IV (n = 7) as compared with the stage III (n = 35). The difference, however, did not reach statistical significance, apparently, because of the limited number of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows higher expression of γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci in rectal cancer patients compared with healthy individuals. Yet the data in vitro were not predictive in regard to the radiotherapy outcome.

Exploiting biological and physical determinants of radiotherapy toxicity to individualize treatment

The recent advances in radiation delivery can improve tumour control probability (TCP) and reduce treatment-related toxicity. The use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in particular can reduce normal tissue toxicity, an objective in its own right, and can allow safe dose escalation in selected cases. Ideally, IMRT should be combined with image guidance to verify the position of the target, since patients, target and organs at risk can move day to day. Daily image guidance scans can be used to identify the position of normal tissue structures and potentially to compute the daily delivered dose. Fundamentally, it is still the tolerance of the normal tissues that limits radiotherapy (RT) dose and therefore tumour control. However, the dose-response relationships for both tumour and normal tissues are relatively steep, meaning that small dose differences can translate into clinically relevant improvements. Differences exist between individuals in the severity of toxicity experienced for a given dose of RT. Some of this difference may be the result of differences between the planned dose and the accumulated dose (DA). However, some may be owing to intrinsic differences in radiosensitivity of the normal tissues between individuals. This field has been developing rapidly, with the demonstration of definite associations between genetic polymorphisms and variation in toxicity recently described. It might be possible to identify more resistant patients who would be suitable for dose escalation, as well as more sensitive patients for whom toxicity could be reduced or avoided. Daily differences in delivered dose have been investigated within the VoxTox research programme, using the rectum as an example organ at risk. In patients with prostate cancer receiving curative RT, considerable daily variation in rectal position and dose can be demonstrated, although the median position matches the planning scan well. Overall, in 10 patients, the mean difference between planned and accumulated rectal equivalent uniform doses was -2.7 Gy (5%), and a dose reduction was seen in 7 of the 10 cases. If dose escalation was performed to take rectal dose back to the planned level, this should increase the mean TCP (as biochemical progression-free survival) by 5%. Combining radiogenomics with individual estimates of DA might identify almost half of patients undergoing radical RT who might benefit from either dose escalation, suggesting improved tumour cure or reduced toxicity or both.

The current progress and future prospects of personalized radiogenomic cancer study

During the last twenty years, mounting studies have supported the hypothesis that there is a genetic component that plays an important role in clinically observed variability in individual tissue/organ toxicity after radiotherapy. We propose the term “Personalized Radiogenomics” for the translational study of individual genetic variations that may associate with or contribute to the responses of tissues to radiation therapy used in the treatment of all types of cancer. The missions of personalized radiogenomic research are 1) to reveal the related genes, proteins, and biological pathways responsible for non-tumor or tumor tissue toxicity resulting from radiotherapy that could be targeted with radio-sensitizing and/or radio-protective agents, and 2) to identify specific genetic markers that can be used in risk prediction and evaluation models before and after clinical cancer surgery. For the members of the Terry Fox Cancer Research Lab in China Medical University and Hospital, the long-term goal is to develop SNP-based risk models that can be used to stratify patients to more precisely tailored radiotherapy protocols. Worldwide, the field has evolved over the last two decades in parallel with rapid advances in genetic and genomic technology, moving step by step from narrowly focused candidate gene studies to large-scale, collaborative genome-wide association studies. This article will summarize the candidate gene association studies published so far from the Terry Fox Cancer Research Lab as well as worldwide on the risk of radiation-related cancers and highlight some wholegenome association studies showing feasibility in fulfilling the dream of personalized radiogenomic cancer therapy.

Radiogenomics helps to achieve personalized therapy by evaluating patient responses to radiation treatment

Radiogenomics is the whole genome application of radiogenetics, which focuses on uncovering the underlying genetic causes of individual variation in sensitivity to radiation. There is a growing consensus that radiosensitivity is a complex, inherited polygenic trait, dependent on the interaction of many genes involved in multiple cell processes. An understanding of the genes involved in processes such as DNA damage response and oxidative stress response, has evolved toward examination of how genetic variants, most often, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), may influence interindividual radioresponse. Many experimental approaches, such as candidate SNP association studies, genome-wide association studies and massively parallel sequencing are being proposed to address these questions. We present a review focusing on recent advances in association studies of SNPs to radiotherapy response and discuss challenges and opportunities for further studies. We also highlight the clinical perspective of radiogenomics in the future of personalized treatment in radiation oncology.

Radiogenomics: the search for genetic predictors of radiotherapy response

'Radiogenomics' is the study of genetic variation associated with response to radiotherapy. Radiogenomics aims to uncover the genes and biologic pathways responsible for radiotherapy toxicity that could be targeted with radioprotective agents and; identify genetic markers that can be used in risk prediction models in the clinic. The long-term goal of the field is to develop single nucleotide polymorphism-based risk models that can be used to stratify patients to more precisely tailored radiotherapy protocols. The field has evolved over the last two decades in parallel with advances in genomics, moving from narrowly focused candidate gene studies to large, collaborative genome-wide association studies. Several confirmed genetic variants have been identified and the field is making progress toward clinical translation.

Exposure to low dose ionising radiation: molecular and clinical consequences

This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the experimental data detailing the incidence, mechanism and significance of low dose hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS). Important discoveries gained from past and present studies are mapped and highlighted to illustrate the pathway to our current understanding of HRS and the impact of HRS on the cellular response to radiation in mammalian cells. Particular attention is paid to the balance of evidence suggesting a role for DNA repair processes in the response, evidence suggesting a role for the cell cycle checkpoint processes, and evidence investigating the clinical implications/relevance of the effect.

Radiosensitivity in breast cancer assessed by the histone γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci

BACKGROUND

High expression of constitutive histone γ-H2AX, a sensitive marker of DNA damage, might be indicative of defective DNA repair pathway or genomic instability. 53BP1 (p53-binding protein 1) is a conserved checkpoint protein with properties of a DNA double-strand breaks sensor. This study explores the relationship between the clinical radiosensitivity of tumor patients and the expression/induction of γ-H2AX and 53BP1 in vitro.

METHODS

Using immunostaining, we assessed spontaneous and radiation-induced foci of γ-H2AX and 53 BP1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from unselected breast cancer (BC) patients (n=57) undergoing radiotherapy (RT). Cells from apparently healthy donors (n=12) served as references.

RESULTS

Non-irradiated cells from controls and unselected BC patients exhibited similar baseline levels of DNA damage assessed by γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci. At the same time, the γ-H2AX assay of in vitro irradiated cells revealed significant differences between the control group and the group of unselected BC patients with respect to the initial (0.5 Gy, 30 min) and residual (2 Gy, 24 h post-radiation) DNA damage. The numbers of 53BP1 foci analyzed in 35 BC patients were significantly higher than in controls only in case of residual DNA damage. A weak correlation was found between residual foci of both proteins tested. In addition, cells from cancer patients with an adverse acute skin reaction (grade 3) to RT showed significantly increased radiation-induced γ-H2AX foci and their protracted disappearance compared to the group of BC patients with normal skin reaction (grade 0-1). The mean number of γ-H2AX foci after 5 clinical fractions was significantly higher than that before RT, especially in clinically radiosensitive patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The γ-H2AX assay may have potential for screening individual radiosensitivity of breast cancer patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.krebshilfe.de/wir-foerdern.html.

Prolonged expression of the γ-H2AX DNA repair biomarker correlates with excess acute and chronic toxicity from radiotherapy treatment

The normal tissue tolerance levels to fractionated radiotherapy have been appreciated by a century of careful clinical observations and radiobiological studies in animals. During clinical fractionated radiotherapy, these normal tissue tolerance levels are respected, and severe sequelae of radiotherapy are avoided in the majority of patients. Notwithstanding, a minority of patients experience unexpectedly severe normal tissue reactions. The ability to predict which patients might form this minority would be important. We have conducted a study to develop a rapid and reliable diagnostic test to predict excessive normal tissue toxicity (NTT) in radiotherapy patients. A flow cytometric immunocytochemical assay was used to measure DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) from cancer patients exposed to 2-Gy gamma radiation. DNA damage and repair was measured by induction of cellular γ-H2AX in unirradiated and exposed cells at specific time points following exposure. In 12 cancer patients that experienced severe atypical NTT following radiotherapy, there was a failure to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) as measured by γ-H2AX induction and persistence. In ten cancer patients that experienced little or no NTT and in seven normal (noncancer controls), efficient repair of DNA DSB was observed in the γ-H2AX assay. We conclude that a flow cytometric assay based on γ-H2AX induction in PBL of radiotherapy patients may represent a robust, rapid and reliable biomarker to predict NTT during radiotherapy. Further research is required with a larger patient cohort to validate this important study.

Radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis to predict radiation therapy late toxicity in prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

To examine a potential correlation between the in vitro apoptotic response of lymphocytes to radiation and the risk of developing late gastrointestinal (GI)/genitourinary (GU) toxicity from radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Prostate cancer patients formerly enrolled in a randomized study were tested for radiosensitivity by using a radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis assay. Apoptosis was measured using flow cytometry-based Annexin-FITC/7AAD and DiOC(6)/7AAD assays in subpopulations of lymphocytes (total lymphocytes, CD4+, CD8+ and CD4-/CD8-) after exposure to an in vitro dose of 0, 2, 4, or 8 Gy.

RESULTS

Patients with late toxicity after radiotherapy showed lower lymphocyte apoptotic responses to 8 Gy than patients who had not developed late toxicity (p = 0.01). All patients with late toxicity had apoptosis levels that were at or below the group mean. The negative predictive value in both apoptosis assays ranged from 95% to 100%, with sensitivity values of 83% to 100%. Apoptosis at lower dose points and in lymphocyte subpopulations had a weaker correlation with the occurrence of late toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphocyte apoptosis after 8 Gy of radiation has the potential to predict which patients will be spared late toxicity after radiation therapy. Further research should be performed to identify the specific subset of lymphocytes that correlates with late toxicity, followed by a corresponding prospective study.

Chromosomal radiosensitivity in patients with common variable immunodeficiency

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a heterogeneous group of primary immunodeficiency disorders. In addition to recurrent infections and autoimmunity, cancers are more prevalent in these patients than the normal population. Increased radiosensitivity may be a reason for the increased malignancies. To analyze chromosomal radiosensitivity of CVID patients, lymphocytes were cultured from 20 CVID patients. After irradiation (50, 100 cGy), metaphases were evaluated for chromosomal aberrations. Results were compared in patients, healthy individuals, and ataxia telangiectasia as positive controls. Before irradiation there was no difference between groups of patients, but after radiation, the incidence of all kinds of aberrations was higher in the CVID patients and this was statistically significant at 100 cGy (P<0.05). CVID patients appear to be susceptible to in vitro irradiation. These patients should be protected from unnecessary radiographic diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Also, radiosensitivity may help classifying CVID patients.

Can the severity of normal tissue damage after radiation therapy be predicted?

Begg discusses a new study by Svensson and colleagues in which the researchers attempted to elucidate genetic factors involved in late radiation toxicity.

Radiosensitivity in breast cancer assessed by the Comet and micronucleus assays

Spontaneous and radiation-induced genetic instability of peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from unselected breast cancer (BC) patients (n=50) was examined using the single-cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay and a modified G2 micronucleus (MN) test. Cells from apparently healthy donors (n=16) and from cancer patients (n=9) with an adverse early skin reaction to radiotherapy (RT) served as references. Nonirradiated cells from the three tested groups exhibited similar baseline levels of DNA fragmentation assessed by the Comet assay. Likewise, the Comet analysis of in vitro irradiated (5 Gy) cells did not reveal any significant differences among the three groups with respect to the initial and residual DNA fragmentation, as well as the DNA repair kinetics. The G2 MN test showed that cells from cancer patients with an adverse skin reaction to RT displayed increased frequencies of both spontaneous and radiation-induced MN compared to healthy control or the group of unselected BC patients. Two patients from the latter group developed an increased early skin reaction to RT, which was associated with an increased initial DNA fragmentation in vitro only in one of them. Cells from the other BC patient exhibited a striking slope in the dose–response curve detected by the G2 MN test. We also found that previous RT strongly increased both spontaneous and in vitro radiation-induced MN levels, and to a lesser extent, the radiation-induced DNA damage assessed by the Comet assay. These data suggest that clinical radiation may provoke genetic instability and/or induce persistent DNA damage in normal cells of cancer patients, thus leading to increased levels of MN induction and DNA fragmentation after irradiation in vitro. Therefore, care has to be taken when blood samples collected postradiotherapeutically are used to assess the radiosensitivity of cancer patients.

Predicting radiosensitivity using DNA end-binding complex analysis

Previous reports have suggested that measuring radiosensitivity of normal and tumor cells would have significant clinical relevance for the practice of radiation oncology. We hypothesized that radiosensitivity might be predicted by analyzing DNA end-binding complexes (DNA-EBCs), which form at DNA double-strand breaks, the most important cytotoxic lesion caused by radiation. To test this hypothesis, the DNA-EBC pattern of 21 primary human fibroblast cultures and 15 tumor cell lines were studied. DNA-EBC patterns were determined using a modified electrophoretic mobility shift assay and were correlated with radiosensitivity, as measured by SF2. DNA-EBC analysis identified a rapidly migrating ATM-containing band (identified as "band-A") of which the density correlated with SF2 (0.02 </= SF2 </= 0.41) in primary fibroblasts (r(2) = 0.77). The DNA-EBC pattern of peripheral blood lymphocytes was identical to that of fibroblasts. In addition, band-A density correlated with SF2 (0.35 </= SF2 </= 0.80) in 15 human tumor cell lines (r(2) = 0.91). Densitometry of other bands, or total DNA-EBC binding, correlated more poorly with SF2 (r(2) < 0.45). These data indicate that DNA-EBC analysis may be a practical, clinically relevant predictor of tumor and primary cell radiosensitivity.

Normal expression of DNA repair proteins, hMre11, Rad50 and Rad51 but protracted formation of Rad50 containing foci in X-irradiated skin fibroblasts from radiosensitive cancer patients

About 5% of oncology patients treated by radiation therapy develop acute or late radiotoxic effects whose molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this study, we evaluated the potential role of DNA repair proteins in the hypersensitivity of cancer patients to radiation therapy. The expression levels and focal nuclear distribution of DNA repair proteins, hMre11, Rad50 and Rad51 were investigated in skin fibroblasts strains derived from cancer patients with adverse early skin reaction to radiotherapy using Western blot and foci immunofluorescence techniques, respectively. Cells from cancer patients with normal reaction to radiotherapy as well as cells from apparently healthy subjects served as controls. Cellular radiosensitivity after in vitro irradiation was assessed by the clonogenic survival assay. The clonogenic survival assay and Western blot analysis of the DNA repair proteins did not reveal any abnormalities in cellular radiosensitivity in vitro and in protein expression levels or their migration patterns in the fibroblasts derived from cancer patients with hypersensitive reaction to radiotherapy. In contrast, in vitro irradiated cells from radiosensitive patients exhibited a significantly higher number of nuclei with focally concentrated Rad50 protein than in both control groups. The observed alteration of the distribution of radiation-induced Rad50 foci in cells derived from cancer patients with acute side reactions to radiotherapy might contribute to their radiation therapy outcome. These data suggest the usefulness of the Rad50 foci analysis for predicting clinical response of cancer patients to radiotherapy.

Where next with preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer?

PURPOSE

The basic question for radiation oncologists is what we hope to achieve from treatments that are adjuvant to surgery: better local (pelvic) control and, hopefully, because of that, fewer metastases. Chemotherapy could add to the local effect of irradiation and may also decrease distant metastases directly. Selection criteria for individual treatment could enhance the therapeutic index.

LOCAL CONTROL

Total mesorectal excision reduces the incidence of local recurrence, but preoperative (chemo) radiation is still indicated for more advanced tumors (T3-T4) and for lymph node involvement. Pelvic recurrences arise from tumor clonogens residual beyond the surgical margins. Thus, the practice of shrinking fields to boost the dose to the primary tumor makes no sense, except for tumors that invade residual structures, such as the sacrum. Subclinical disease beyond the future surgical margins grows more quickly than the primary tumor, and hence treatment should be as intense as tolerable. A short treatment course (e.g. 5 x 5 Gy) is desirable, but this regimen, which is currently the gold standard, should be compared (as in the recently closed randomized Polish trial) with higher-dose, longer-duration chemoradiotherapy regimens. The recently closed EORTC trial 22921 examines the benefit of pre- and postoperative chemotherapy combined with a long schedule of radiation. Likewise, continuous infusion of a cycle-active agent rather than bolus administration is a logical addition to radiation therapy in the treatment of fast-growing subclinical tumor extensions.

SYSTEMIC DISEASE

The reduction in distant metastasis rates attributable to adjuvant chemotherapy varies greatly among reports. If the reduction is of the order of 10-25%, the efficacy of chemotherapy equates to as little as about 5 to 12.5 Gy and not more than 20 Gy of total body irradiation.

INTERVAL BETWEEN RADIATION THERAPY AND POSTRADIATION SURGERY

Early excision after preoperative irradiation would be desirable if the primary tumor were still disseminating viable metastatic clonogens. Most tumors do not metastasize until they contain enough viable clonogens to render them clinically detectable. A dose of 10 Gy in 2 Gy fractions reduces at least 30-fold the absolute number of viable clonogens in the primary tumor, to levels that do not yield metastases from the untreated tumor. After a dose of 44-50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions, there is little chance that the surviving tumor clonogens could regrow to a metastasis-yielding volume in any reasonable radiation-surgery interval. Thus there is no tumor-related necessity for early postradiation surgery. The importance of the interval between radiation and surgery is currently being addressed in a Swedish randomized trial.

PROGNOSTIC AND PREDICTIVE CHARACTERIZATION

Tumor volume should be included in the staging system. There are many tumor- and host-related characteristics that can be used to fingerprint the tumor to help select appropriate individual treatment.

Radiation-hypersensitive cancer patients do not manifest protein expression abnormalities in components of the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway

Radiation therapy (RT) is utilised for the treatment of around half of all oncology patients during the course of their illness. Despite great clinical progress in the rational deployment of RT, the underlying molecular basis for its efficacy and toxicity are currently imperfectly understood. In this study, we took a biochemical approach to evaluate the potential role of key ionising radiation repair proteins in the treatment outcomes of patients with severe acute or late RT side effects. Lymphoblastoid cell lines were established from blood samples from 36 radiosensitive cases and a number of controls (the latter had had RT but did not develop significant toxicity). The expression level and migration of key proteins from the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway was evaluated by Western blot analysis on cases and controls. We did not observe any abnormalities in expression level or migration pattern of the following NHEJ proteins in radiosensitive cancer cases: Ku70, Ku80, XRCC4, DNA Ligase IV. These important negative results provide evidence that mutations that affect protein expression of these NHEJ components are unlikely to underlie clinical radiation sensitivity.

Chromosomal aberrations induced by chemotherapy and radiotherapy in lymphocytes from patients with breast carcinoma

PURPOSE

Stable chromosomal aberrations (SCAs) have been found in circulating lymphocytes from patients treated for breast carcinoma. Therefore, we tried to define their incidence in such patients, to determine an in vitro dose-effect relationship, and to correlate these data with clinical parameters.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This prospective study included 25 patients who, after surgery, underwent either radiotherapy (RT) alone (n = 15) or RT combined with chemotherapy (n = 10). SCAs were scored using the fluorescent in situ hybridization technique before RT and 4 and 12 months after RT. Dose-effect curves were established by in vitro irradiation of blood samples with 2 and 4 Gy, before and after treatment.

RESULTS

In all patients, the rate of SCAs increased significantly after external irradiation. No significant decrease in SCAs was observed during the first year after RT. RT and chemotherapy had no effect on the lymphocyte in vitro dose-effect relationship. No relationship was found in the distribution of patients between the yield of SCAs scored after external irradiation and after in vitro irradiation. SCAs after RT or in vitro irradiation did not correlate with family history of breast carcinoma or acute toxicity of treatment. More significantly, the yield of SCA after external irradiation was strongly related to the irradiation of the internal mammary chain and the supraclavicular lymph node area, suggesting that the volume of irradiated blood vessels was an essential parameter in determining the rate of SCAs.

CONCLUSION

A high and stable yield of SCAs persisted at least 1 year after external irradiation. The nature of the volume irradiated containing large blood vessels was the major determinant of the observed biologic dose.

Studies on radiosensitivity from an epidemiological point of view - overview of methods and results

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The establishment of a predictive in vitro assay for radiosensitivity has been a goal in radiotherapy research. To date, no single assay has proven to be effective for this purpose. A review of the epidemiologic methods used in the studies has been undertaken to evaluate limitations associated with specific design options and to develop recommendations for future research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We focused on studies attempting to establish the usefulness of an assay in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy using skin reactions as indicators for radiosensitivity. The 25 published studies included were evaluated with respect to criteria for good epidemiological studies: (a) study design, (b) study population, (c) assessment of radiation reaction, and (d) treatment of confounding factors.

RESULTS

Limitations in study design were often found among the studies reviewed. Possible sources of bias are, among others, misclassification due to non-standardized assessment of side effects, selection bias due to drawing convenience patient groups instead of representative patient groups, and confounding due to analysis not adjusted for important factors influencing the severity of side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies should make use of good epidemiological practice so that valid conclusions can be drawn with respect to the usefulness of an in vitro assay to distinguish between patients with different degrees of radiosensitivity in clinical practice.

Normal tissue radiobiology: from the laboratory to the clinic

This manuscript is in four parts, presenting the four talks given in a symposium on normal tissue radiobiology. The first part addresses the general concept of the role of parenchymal cell radiosensitivity vs. other factors, highlighting research over the last decade that has altered our understanding of factors underlying normal tissue response. The other three parts expand on specific themes raised in the first part dealing in particular with (1) modifications of fibroblast response to irradiation in relation to the induction of tissue fibrosis, (2) the use of the linear-quadratic equation to model the potential benefits of using different means (both physical and biologic) of modifying normal tissue response, and (3) the specific role of the growth factor TFG-beta1 in normal tissue response to irradiation. The symposium highlights the complexities of the radiobiology of late normal tissue responses, yet provides evidence and ideas about how the clinical problem of such responses may be modified or alleviated.

Mutation analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 cancer predisposition genes in radiation hypersensitive cancer patients

PURPOSE

The dose intensity of radiotherapy (RT) used in cancer treatment is limited in rare individuals who display severe normal tissue reactions after standard RT treatments. Novel predictive assays are required to identify these individuals prior to treatment. The mechanisms responsible for such reactions are unknown, but may involve dysfunction of genes involved in the sensing and response of cells to DNA damage. The breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are implicated in DNA damage repair and the control of genome stability. The purpose of this study was to determine if clinical radiation hypersensitivity is related to mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Such information is of potential use in the clinical management of BRCA mutation carriers and their families.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-two cancer patients who developed severe normal tissue reactions after RT were screened for mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2, using various methods including protein truncation testing, direct DNA sequencing, and a PCR-based BRCA1 exon 13 duplication test.

RESULTS

No mutations were detected in the 22 patients tested, despite screening for the majority of commonly described types of mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2.

CONCLUSION

These early results suggest that genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 probably account for most cases of clinical radiation hypersensitivity, and that screening for mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 is unlikely to be useful in predicting response to radiotherapy. However, it has not been excluded that some BRCA1 or BRCA2 heterozygotes might experience unexpected RT toxicity; further BRCA mutation screening on radiation sensitive individuals is warranted.

Four radiation hypersensitivity cases and their implications for clinical radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Over a 20 year period, four out of 2000 paediatric radiotherapy patients, treated at St. Bartholomew's Hospital (three with lymphoma, one with angiosarcoma), have revealed extreme/fatal clinical hypersensitivity in normal tissues.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cellular hypersensitivity was confirmed in vitro and attributed to the ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) gene in cases I and II, a newly described defect in the DNA ligase 4 gene in case III, and a novel and as yet incompletely defined, molecular defect in case IV who presented with xeroderma pigmentosum (XP).

RESULTS

The severe clinical hypersensitivity preceded the cellular and molecular analysis, but did not manifest as a clinically exaggerated normal tissue reaction until 3+ weeks after the start of a conventionally fractionated course of radiotherapy, by which time the latent damage had been inflicted. There were no clinical stigmata to alert the clinician to a predisposing syndrome in two patients (cases I and II). We point out that approximately 20% of A-T patients are classified as variants with delayed expression of clinical symptoms, and case II falls into this category.

CONCLUSIONS

As lymphoma (incidence, one in 100000 children) constituted the majority of the diagnoses, questions arise as to: (1), the probability of other centres having experienced and being presented in the future with similar problems (particularly bearing in mind that other oncologically predisposing radiosensitivity syndromes have not been not represented in our experience); and (2), the appropriateness, efficiency and applicability of predictive assays. Unambiguous cellular radiosensitivity would have been apparent from clonal assays on fibroblast cultures from all four cases prior to treatment, but such assays take 4-6 weeks to produce results. While estimates of chromosome damage or clonal assays on pre-treatment blood derived cells would be faster, there is a health economics issue as to the general applicability of such 'screening' assays.

Altered apoptotic profiles in irradiated patients with increased toxicity

PURPOSE

A retrospective study of radiation-induced apoptosis in CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes, from 12 cancer patients who displayed enhanced toxicity to radiation therapy and 9 ataxia telangiectasia patients, was performed to test for altered response compared to healthy blood-donors and normal cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Three milliliters of heparinized blood from each donor was sent via express post to the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) for subsequent examination. The blood was diluted 1:10 in RPMI medium, irradiated with 0-, 2-, or 9-Gy X-rays, and incubated for 48 h. CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes were then labeled using FITC-conjugated antibodies, erythrocytes were lysed, and the DNA stained with propidium iodide. Subsequently, cells were analyzed using a Becton Dickinson FACScan flow cytometer. Radiation-induced apoptosis was recognized in leukocytes as reduced DNA content attributed to apoptosis-associated changes in chromatin structure. Apoptosis was confirmed by light microscopy, electron microscopy, and by the use of commercially available apoptosis detection kits (in situ nick translation and Annexin V). Data from hypersensitive individuals were compared to a standard database of 105 healthy blood-donors, and a database of 48 cancer patient blood donors who displayed normal toxicity to radiation therapy. To integrate radiosensitivity results from CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes after 2 and 9 Gy, z-score analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A cohort of 12 hypersensitive patients was evaluated; 8 showed enhanced early toxicity, 3 showed enhanced late toxicity, and 1 showed both. The cohort displayed less radiation-induced apoptosis (-1.8 sigma) than average age-matched donors. A cohort of 9 ataxia telangiectasia homozygotes displayed even less apoptosis (-3.6 sigma).

CONCLUSION

The leukocyte apoptosis assay appears to be a useful predictor of individuals likely to display increased toxicity to radiation therapy; however, validation of this requires a prospective study.

Cellular responses to radiation and risk of breast cancer

Mutations in the ataxia telangiectasia gene (ATM) result in an abnormal p53-mediated cellular response to DNA damage produced by ionising radiation. This deficiency is believed to contribute to the radiosensitivity and high cancer risk seen in ataxia telangiectasia (AT) patients and AT heterozygotes. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that relatives of AT patients are particularly predisposed to breast cancer. This observation, together with the finding that a relatively high proportion of breast cancer patients display an abnormal severe reaction of normal tissues following radiotherapy, has led to the suggestion that AT heterozygosity plays a role in radiosensitivity and breast cancer development. The cloning of the ATM gene has allowed this possibility to be examined at the molecular level. The studies reported to date remain inconclusive, with the number of AT heterozygotes being found in radiosensitive breast cancer patients being less than would be expected based on the family studies. The potential role of several other recently identified genes which are involved in the cellular DNA damage response to ionising radiation and which could also play a role in radiosensitivity and breast cancer development are reviewed.

The modelled benefits of individualizing radiotherapy patients' dose using cellular radiosensitivity assays with inherent variability

OBJECTIVE

To model the increases in local tumour control that may be achieved, without increasing normal tissue complications, by prescribing a patient's dose based on cellular radiosensitivity measured using an assay possessing inherent variability.

METHOD

Patient populations with varying radiosensitivity were simulated, based on measured distributions among cancer patients of the surviving fraction of their fibroblasts given a dose of 2 Gy in vitro (SF2). The dose-response curve for complications in the population was assessed using a formula relating SF2 to normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), by summing the data for the individuals. This curve was similar to clinically-derived dose-response curves. The effect of individualizing the patients' doses was explored, based on individual radiosensitivities measured by SF2, so that every patient had the same low (5%) value of NTCP.

RESULTS

It was found that a significant gain (up to around 30%) in tumour control probability (TCP) was predicted for the population when the doses were individualized using a predictive assay result strongly correlated with NTCP. A greater gain in TCP was predicted when each of the individuals were assumed to have a higher sensitivity and the distribution of radiosensitivity in the population was widened to compensate. The gain in TCP was less (around 20%) when considering less-sensitive patients and a narrower distribution of radiosensitivities. The effect of assay variability and other factors that could affect the predictive power of the assay was simulated. Assay variability and an imperfect correlation between in vitro cell survival and tissue complications, rapidly increased the NTCP for the population when treated with individualized doses. However the individualized doses could be reduced so that NTCP declined to an acceptable level, but in this case the TCP for the population also declined. For example, when the assay variability was half the true variability in SF2, the gain in TCP was reduced to around 6%. Also, the predicted gains in population TCP were higher if tumour and normal tissue radiosensitivity were assumed to be correlated. In this case, and in the absence of assay variability, increases in population TCP of about 50% and 30% were predicted, depending on the assumed relative sensitivities of the individual patients compared with that of the population average. For practical application, the division of the patient population simply into three groups of high, average and low radiosensitivity was also examined. The three groups were treated with different doses and the NTCP for the population was kept below 5%. Although the gain in population TCP was less than that predicted with the full individualization, considerable gains of up to 20% were still predicted. This method of dividing the population was more resilient to assay variability and other factors that may affect complications in patients. The modelling suggests that small improvements in TCP (5-10%) may still be achievable even if the correlation between SF2 and late complications is lower at around - 0.4 to - 0.6, as reported in some clinical series.

CONCLUSION

Modelling based on measured distributions of fibroblast radiosensitivity shows that improvements in tumour control rates may be achievable through the individualization of radiotherapy dose prescriptions of cancer patients, when assay variability is less than about 50% of the true variability in radiosensitivity, and with greater benefits if tumour and normal tissue radiosensitivity are correlated. Tripartite stratification of the population proved to be less sensitive to assay uncertainty, and can provide most of the benefits of the full individualization.

Describing patients' normal tissue reactions: concerning the possibility of individualising radiotherapy dose prescriptions based on potential predictive assays of normal tissue radiosensitivity. Steering Committee of the BioMed2 European Union Concerted Action Programme on the Development of Predictive Tests of Normal Tissue Response to Radiation Therapy

Clinical radiotherapeutic doses are limited by the tolerance of normal tissues. Patients given a standard treatment exhibit a range of normal tissue reactions, and a better understanding of this individual variation might allow for individualisation of radiotherapeutic prescriptions, with consequent improvement in the therapeutic ratio. At present, there is no simple way to describe normal tissue reactions, which hampers communication between clinic and laboratory and between groups from different centres. There is also no method for comparing the severity of reactions in different normal tissues. This arises largely because there is no definition of a "normal" reaction, an "extreme" reaction or the particular term "over-reactor" (OR). This report proposes definitions for these terms, as well as a simple terminology for describing normal tissue reactions in patients having radiotherapy. The "normal" range represents the individual variation in normal tissue reactions amongst large numbers of patients treated in the same way which is within clinically acceptable limits. The term "OR" is applied to an individual whose reaction is more severe than the normal range but also implies that this forced a major change in the radiotherapeutic prescription or that the reactions were very severe or fatal. A "severe OR" would develop serious problems with a typical radical dose, while an "extreme OR" would have such difficulties at a much lower dose. To describe the normal range, a numerical scale is suggested, from 1 to 5, resistant to sensitive. The term "highly radiosensitive" (HR) is suggested for category 5. An "informal" relative scale, as suggested here, is quick and simple. It should allow comparison between different hospitals, compensate for differences in radiotherapeutic dose and technique and allow comparison of reactions between different anatomical sites. It should be adequate for discriminating patients at the extremes of the normal range from those at the centre. It is hoped that the definitions and terminology proposed here will aid communication in the field of predictive testing of normal tissue radiosensitivity.

Comparison between radiation-induced cell cycle delay in lymphocytes and radiotherapy response in head and neck cancer

A study was made evaluating the use of radiation-induced cell cycle delay in lymphocytes to predict tumour response to radiotherapy. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were isolated from whole blood from 49 patients with head and neck cancer before treatment with radiotherapy and from 25 healthy donors. The clinical response to radiotherapy was assessed at 0-2 months after treatment. The level of radiation-induced cell cycle delay was measured using flow cytometry after mitogen stimulation of lymphocytes. The analysis of ten normal donors gave no significant difference in variability between the intra-assay and the intra-donor samples. However, the cell cycle data for lymphocytes from these healthy donors showed significant inter-individual differences in G2 phase accumulation. Patients showing no response to radiotherapy had a high level of S-phase cells compared with partial (P < 0.001) and complete responders (P = 0.016). An inverse relationship was found when analysing the fraction of cells in G2 (P = 0.009 and 0.034 respectively). In general, healthy donors had similar cell cycle kinetics compared with the non-responders. In conclusion, the result indicates that radiation-induced cell cycle delay in lymphocytes is inversely correlated with tumour response to radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients. However, the value of the present test for predicting individual tumour response is limited, because of assay variability and overlap between groups.

Potential clinical impact of normal-tissue intrinsic radiosensitivity testing

A critical appraisal is given of the possible benefit from a reliable pre-treatment knowledge of individual normal-tissue sensitivity to radiotherapy. The considerations are in part, but not exclusively, based on the recent experience with in vitro colony-forming assays of the surviving fraction at 2 Gy, the SF2. Three strategies are reviewed: (1) to screen for rare cases with extreme radiosensitivity, so-called over-reactors, and treat these with reduced total dose, (2) to identify the sensitive tail of the distribution of 'normal' radiosensitivities, refer these patients to other treatment, and to escalate the dose to the remaining patients, or (3) to individualize dose prescriptions based on individual radiosensitivity, i.e. treating to isoeffect rather than to a specific dose-fractionation schedule. It is shown that these strategies will have a small, if any, impact on routine radiotherapy. Screening for over-reactors is hampered by the low prevalence of these among otherwise un-selected patients that leads to a low positive predictive value of in vitro radiosensitivity assays. It is argued, that this problem may persist even if the noise on current assays could be reduced to (the unrealistic value of) zero, simply because of the large biological variation in SF2. Removing the sensitive tail of the patient population, will only have a minor effect on the dose that could be delivered to the remaining patients, because of the sigmoid shape of empirical dose-response relationships. Finally, individualizing dose prescriptions based exclusively on information from a normal-tissue radiosensitivity assay, leads to a nearly symmetrical distribution of dose-changes that would produce a very small gain, or even a loss, of tumor control probability if implemented in the clinic. From a theoretical point of view, other strategies could be devised and some of these are considered in this review. Right now the most promising clinical use of in vitro radiosensitivity assays may be as a guide for the prescription of treatment schedules that are costly or involves a high risk of complications. Examples of this are certain strategies attempting to widen the therapeutic window, the use of very high doses or re-irradiation of a previously irradiated region, or the selection of patients for experimental strategies like the use of biological response modifiers to reduce normal-tissue toxicity. Finally, published data are summarized on the possible correlation between the radiosensitivities of tumor and normal tissues or between the sensitivities of various normal tissues.

In vitro radiosensitivity of primary human fibroblasts. Lack of correlation with acute radiation toxicity in patients with head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is a considerable hope among clinicians and radiobiologists to detect genetically radiosensitive patients prior to radiotherapy. A predictive assay would enable adjustment of the total irradiation dose to the individual at a constant risk of normal tissue complications. In this prospective study, the clonogenic survival assay for primary human fibroblasts to determine radiosensitivity in vitro was evaluated and then correlated with clinically observed acute radiation reactions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-five independent survival experiments with primary fibroblasts derived from 63 biopsies from 55 cancer and non-cancer patients were performed.

RESULTS

A wide variation of cell survival between biopsies was detected. Statistical analysis revealed a highly significantly larger interindividual than intraindividual variation of SF2 values. However, a considerable scatter of SF2 values in repeated experiments was observed in individual cases. Age, gender, disease status (cancer patient, non-cancer patient) and origin of fibroblasts (skin, periodontal tissue) were demonstrated not to be statistically significant confounding factors on the intrinsic radiosensitivity in vitro. In a prospective study, no correlation of the SF2 and acute reactions in 25 patients with head and neck cancer treated with a primary accelerated radiochemotherapy was detected.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that the clonogenic assay is able to distinguish between intrinsic radiosensitivities of primary human fibroblasts if a statistical approach is used but does not predict acute radiation toxicity.

Rapid assay of intrinsic radiosensitivity based on apoptosis in human CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes

PURPOSE

An assay for radiosensitivity has numerous applications in the clinic. Avoidance of acute responses, prediction of normal tissue toxicity, and individualization of patient radiotherapy are included among these. We have developed a rapid assay (about 24 h) able to predict intrinsic radiosensitivity of CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes based on radiation-induced apoptosis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fresh blood samples (1-2 ml in heparinized tubes) were irradiated with 0-, 2-, and 8-Gy X rays at a dose rate of approximately 3 Gy/min. Following irradiation, the cells were collected and prepared for flow-cytometric analysis and cell sorting. In conjunction with the CellQuest software available with the FACSVantage cell sorter (Becton-Dickinson), two T-lymphocyte types were analyzed on the basis of their cell-specific antigens (CD4 and CD8), and DNA was stained with DAPI. Following the separation of these cell types, radiation-induced cell death was assessed. Cytotoxicity was characterized by gradual degradation of internucleosomal DNA which results in a sub-G1 peak on the DNA histogram, and by the associated loss of surface antigens causing an intermediate positive peak in the antibody histogram. Using the assay, we investigated the interdonor variation in a cohort of 45 healthy adult blood donors and 5 children [one had immunodeficiency, centromeric instability, and facial anomalies syndrome (ICF), and one had ataxia telangiectasia (AT)]. Intradonor variation was assessed with 10 different experiments from a single donor.

RESULTS

CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocyte radiosensitivities were correlated (r = 0.63 and 0.65 for 2 and 8 Gy, respectively) in 45 adult donors. Both for CD4 and CD8 cells, 2 and 8 Gy irradiation responses showed a good correlation (r = 0.77 for both). Interdonor variation was significantly higher than intradonor variation (p < 0.0005) for all CD4 and CD8 data. We observed a decrease in the antigen fluorescence of dying cells, a phenomenon referred to as antigen-ebb. Antigen-ebb was clearly observed in both cell types, and correlated significantly with cytotoxicity. A trend was observed between radiosensitivity and donor age, but there was no correlation for gender. Blood from a 4-year-old girl presenting with ICF demonstrated compromised radiation-induced cytotoxicity in her CD4 T-lymphocytes, and an 11-year-old boy presenting with AT demonstrated compromised radiation-induced cytotoxicity in both his CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the assay provides a rapid means of determining radiosensitivity, can discriminate differences in radiation-induced cytotoxicity between individuals, and can be used as a rapid screen for genetically hypersensitive patients. Antigen-ebb offers interesting possibilities for molecular biological investigations, permitting characterization and isolation of abnormal but vital cells in the absence of clastogenic agents.

Theory and practice of predictive assays in radiation therapy

PURPOSE

An overview of the field of predictive assays is presented. It has been written with the many clinicians and scientists in mind who would like to become better acquainted with the general scope, principles and themes in the field.

RESULTS

Predictive assays have yielded much valuable information about the radiobiology of tumors e.g. the overall treatment time for rapidly proliferating tumors should be kept to a minimum. However, alteration of current treatment protocols based on results from predictive assays is still a matter of debate. What justification do we have to change established treatment protocols? A necessary and sufficient justification would be when the test value indicated an alternative treatment producing a better outcome, i.e. higher survival, improved local control, etc. Necessary but not always sufficient justification is correlation between the parameter measured and clinical outcome, if insufficient clinical benefit can be derived even when this is known. It is not sufficient that a test be demonstrated to be discriminatory. It must discriminate a sufficient number of patients, and its use must provide the patient with useful therapeutic alternatives. These parameters measured by predictive assays may well interact radiobiologically, and restricting observations to just one assay is probably insufficient for reliable indications. In the future, it is more likely that a panel of tests will be performed, and clinical decisions based on multi-parametric analysis of biopsy material.

CONCLUSION

In the following overview general predictive assay theory is presented followed by a brief introduction to some of the more established assays and finally some guidelines are suggested for the development of new assays.

Absence of mutations in the ATM gene in breast cancer patients with severe responses to radiotherapy

The effectiveness of cancer radiotherapy is compromised by the small proportion (approximately 5%) of patients who sustain severe normal tissue damage after standard radiotherapy treatments. Predictive tests are required to identify these highly radiosensitive cases. Patients with the rare, recessively inherited, cancer-prone syndrome ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) sustain extremely severe normal tissue necrosis after radiotherapy and their cultured cells are also highly radiosensitive. Clinically normal carriers (heterozygotes) of the A-T gene have an increased risk of breast cancer, account for approximately 4% of all breast cancer cases and show a modest increase in cellular radiosensitivity in vitro. It has been suggested that a substantial proportion of highly radiosensitive (HR) breast cancer patients may be A-T heterozygotes, and that screening for mutations in the A-T gene could be used as a predictive test. We have tested this hypothesis in a group of cancer patients who showed adverse reactions to radiotherapy. Sixteen HR breast cancer patients showing mainly acute reactions (and seven HR patients with other cancers) were tested for ATM mutations using the restriction endonuclease fingerprinting assay. No mutations typical of those found in obligate A-T heterozygotes were detected. If the estimate that 4% of breast cancer cases are A-T gene carriers is correct, then ATM mutations do not confer clinical radiosensitivity. These early results suggest that screening for ATM mutations in cancer patients may not be of value in predicting adverse reactions.

Radiation therapy tolerance limits. For one or for all?--Janeway Lecture

BACKGROUND

The optimal use of radiation therapy for cancer treatment is hampered by the application of tolerance limits of normal tissues derived empirically from population averages. Such limits do not reflect the considerable differences from patient to patient in susceptibility to late radiation sequelae. Assays that accurately predict normal tissue tolerance in individual patients would permit real application of the concept of treatment to tolerance thereby increasing the probability of an uncomplicated cure for the population as a whole.

METHODS

A summary of laboratory research is presented to test the hypothesis that the cellular radiosensitivity of normal skin fibroblasts can predict the severity of late connective tissue damage that develops following radiotherapy. The pathogenesis of radiation reactions and the possible role of radiation induced cellular senescence in the development of clinical late effects are briefly reviewed.

RESULTS

Although the pathogenesis of radiation injury is highly complex, several clinical studies have demonstrated a significant correlation between fibroblast radiosensitivity and the severity of late sequelae from treatment. However, the precision and reproducibility of fibroblast cell survival assays are inadequate for routine clinical use. Newer assays incorporating insights into the effects of radiation on cellular senescence and cytokine production are being developed. Such assays may, in the future, be complemented or replaced by molecular and/or cytogenetic probes to derive robust estimates of individual tolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

The principle of prediction of tolerance to radiotherapy has been established. Although current assays lack the precision required for clinical use, the goal of individualized treatment to tolerance ultimately should be achieved.

How much could the radiotherapy dose be altered for individual patients based on a predictive assay of normal-tissue radiosensitivity?

Predictive assays are presently being developed to identify the patients at highest risk for developing severe late normal-tissue complications. If such patients could be identified prior to treatment, then the doses to those patients could be reduced to lower their complication rate. In addition, patients identified as being relatively radioresistant could receive higher doses without an increase in complications. The aim of the present study was to estimate the magnitude of the dose adjustments that could potentially be made if radiotherapy doses were tailored to the individual patient using a predictive assay of normal-tissue radiosensitivity. The dose adjustments were estimated by re-analyzing data from an earlier study [13] to determine the influence of dose and in vitro fibroblast radiosensitivity on the incidence of severe late normal-tissue complications. Although the dose estimates are preliminary and based on limited data, the results of this study support the concept that a significant therapeutic gain could be achieved for a subset of patients from the use of a predictive assay of normal-tissue radiosensitivity.

Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization to determine the relationship between chromosome aberrations and cell survival in eight human fibroblast strains

A predictive assay of normal tissue radiosensitivity could benefit 'treatment tailoring' of radiotherapy for certain categories of tumour. The use of present clonogenic cell survival assays for this purpose would be impractical in routine clinical practice because of the lengthy assay time. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using whole chromosome probes on metaphases was investigated as a potential substitute. Eight human fibroblast cell strains with a range of radiosensitivities were tested. For each strain, cell survival curves were determined and correlated with chromosome aberrations detected by FISH performed on metaphase cells collected 52 h after irradiation. A whole chromosome probe for chromosome 4 was used for all cell strains. The results revealed an increase in the percentage of metaphases with aberrant chromosomes (translocations and/or breaks) with increasing radiation dose for all strains. For the more radiosensitive cell strains there were relatively more aberrant metaphases for a given radiation dose when compared with fibroblasts from a normal donor. The relationship between surviving fraction and chromosome aberrations showed some variation between strains, but a linear regression for all data showed a highly statistically significant correlation (r = 0.89, p < 0.0005). These results suggest that an assay of chromosome damage using FISH could substitute for the clonogenic assay to predict the radiation sensitivity of human fibroblasts.

Abnormal radiosensitivity of lymphocytes from breast cancer patients with excessive normal tissue damage after radiotherapy: chromosome aberrations after low dose-rate irradiation

There is a need for a simple, rapid assay for predicting normal tissue reactions in radiotherapy patients to reduce morbidity in sensitive patients and to allow dose escalation in resistant cases. Towards this goal we have investigated the gamma-ray sensitivity of lymphocytes from 16 breast cancer patients who had shown an exaggerated acute or late radiation reaction ('overreaction') of normal tissues after radiotherapy, using chromosome damage (dicentrics) as the endpoint because of its close relationship with cell killing. The use of a low dose-rate (LDR; 0.31 cGy min-1) was found to be better than a high dose-rate (170 cGy min-1) in discriminating between over-reactors and controls, as predicted (and here confirmed) from previous studies on ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) homozygotes and heterozygotes. Five of seven patients with excessive early skin reactions (e.g. erythema, moist desquamation) showed abnormal radiosensitivity, manifested either as aberration yields above the control range after LDR exposure or as less sparing than controls. The average LDR yield for early over-reactions was significantly higher than for controls (p = 0.009) and average sparing was less (p = 0.0002). Two of 10 patients with late complications (fibrosis, telangiectasia) had LDR yields above the control range, but the average yield for late over-reactors was not significantly above that of controls. Unexpectedly, two patients (one early, one late reaction) had LDR aberration yields below the control range. Quantitatively our results are consistent with the notion that over-reacting breast cancer patients are carriers of the A-T gene. Pilot studies on controls showed that the sparing effect of LDR irradiation was increased by lowering the dose-rate to 0.13 cGy min-1 and by using micronuclei rather than metaphase damage as the endpoint. These modifications to the protocol will be used in a large-scale prospective study.

Differential radiosensitising effect of the scid mutation among tissues, studied using high and low dose rates: implications for prognostic indicators in radiotherapy

To assess whether radiation-sensitive or radiation-resistant individuals should in principle be predicted equally well using different cell types, the effect of the scid mutation on the radiosensitivity of colony-forming cells in different murine tissues was assessed using high and low dose-rates. At high dose-rate, the amount of radiosensitization due to the scid mutation was greater in epithelial cells of the intestine and the kidney than in haemopoietic and fibroblastoid cells in the bone marrow, when expressed as a dose reduction factor. However, this greater radiosensitization in intestine and kidney did not translate into bigger differences in SF2 (surviving fraction at 2 Gy) or SF3.5. This was because of the greater inherent radioresistance of the epithelial cells compared with the marrow cells, resulting in smaller changes in cell survival from a given dose. Reductions in cell survival due to the mutation increased with increasing dose as expected at high dose rate. The changes in SF2 and SF3.5 due to the scid mutation were not significantly increased by using low dose-rates, because of the tendency for the presence of some low dose-rate sparing in the scid cells as well as the marked amount observed in the wild-type cells. The implications for predictive testing in radiotherapy are that for genetic defects resulting in the same type of radiosensitization phenomenon shown here for scid cells, radiosensitive or radioresistant cell types may still give similar differentials in response due to the mutation when SF2 is used as an endpoint.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Genetic susceptibility to radiation and chemotherapy injury: diagnosis and management

Over 5% of the cancer patient population may be radiation sensitive due to genetics, and the sensitive patients may be greatly overrepresented among patients with cancer therapy complications. These individuals include not only rare ataxia telangiectasia (AT) homozygotes with up to three-fold normal radiation sensitivity, but also far more numerous patients with slight radiosensitivity conjectured to be carriers of AT or to have another inherited mutagen sensitivity. Procedures may eventually be used to reliably determine patient tolerance for radiation and antineoplastic agents before initiation or completion of therapy, to have the therapy approach but not exceed the radiation tolerance of the individual patient's irradiated normal tissue. Such procedures could include study of patient's cultured normal cells (e.g., fibroblasts, marrow cells, or lymphocytes) in much the same way that patients' cultured tumor cells may eventually be widely used in the human tumor stem cell assay to predict which course of radiotherapy or chemotherapy should be most useful for treating a cancer. Studies with the normal cells could include cytotoxicity assays, serially determined accumulated genetic damage over the course of therapy, or Southern blot analysis to identify carriers of DNA repair mutations. Such studies could permit more aggressive radiotherapy of most patients due to the noninclusion of a sensitive subpopulation of patients, with less radiotherapy of the relatively few radiation sensitive patients. The patient's tumor cells should have inherited any radiation (or chemotherapy) sensitivity mutations present in the patient's normal cells, so reducing the radiotherapy dose to compensate for the more radiosensitive patients' sensitivity will not necessarily result in undertreatment of the tumor.

Increased initial levels of chromosome damage and heterogeneous chromosome repair in ataxia telangiectasia heterozygote cells

Individuals heterozygous for ataxia telangiectasia (AT) appear clinically normal but have a 2-3-fold overall excess risk of cancer. Various approaches have been used to identify AT heterozygotes, however, the results are ambiguous. We recently reported that AT homozygotes exhibit more initial chromosome damage after irradiation than normal cells despite identical levels of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) as well as a reduced fast repair component at both the DNA and chromosome levels. To determine whether AT heterozygotes exhibit the AT or normal cellular phenotype, we compared four AT heterozygote lymphoblastoid cell lines with normal control and AT homozygote lymphoblastoid cells with regard to cell survival, initial levels of damage, and repair at the DNA and chromosome levels after gamma-irradiation in G1, S, and G2 phase (estimated by neutral DNA filter elution and premature chromosome condensation). There was no significant difference in survival, induction and repair of DNA DSBs, or chromosome repair between AT heterozygote and normal cells. In contrast, all four AT heterozygote cell lines showed increased levels of chromosome damage; G1 phase cells showed intermediate levels and G2 phase cells showed levels equivalent to the AT homozygote phenotype. These results suggest that premature chromosome condensation may be useful for detecting AT heterozygotes.

Effect of diet and vitamin C on DNA strand breakage in freshly-isolated human white blood cells

We have measured DNA strand breaks induced by ionising radiation in nucleated cells from freshly isolated whole blood from normal human subjects. Samples were taken after subjects had fasted overnight and again 1 h after they had eaten breakfast in combination with approximately 35 mg/kg vitamin C. Damage was measured by single cell gel electrophoresis (the 'comet' assay), in which DNA single strand breaks generate a comet tail streaming from the nucleus. In repeat experiments on 6 subjects a reduction in DNA damage, as indicated by a highly significant decrease in overall comet length, was observed following vitamin C ingestion, both in the unirradiated control blood samples and in the dose response to ionising radiation damage. In addition, consistent differences in dose response between individual subjects were found. The peak effect was 4 h after intake of food and vitamin C. An effect was also seen with vitamin C alone and after breakfast without additional vitamin C. Protection against strand breakage was also seen in Ficoll-separated mononuclear cells but evidence was not obtained for protection of separated, mitogen stimulated T-lymphocytes either against ionising radiation cell killing in a clonal assay, or against clastogenicity assessed by micronucleus formation following one cell division. Exposure of separated lymphocytes in vitro to vitamin C, at doses greater than 200 microM, did not offer protection but induced strand breakage. Our results raise the possibility that variation in normal diet may not only affect susceptibility to endogenous oxidative damage, but may affect some responses of the individual to radiation.