Patterns of recurrence and outcome for patients with clinical stage II non-small-cell lung cancer

Postoperative surveillance using low-dose computed tomography for non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We retrospectively analysed the surgical prognosis of patients with pathological stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who after complete resection underwent low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) or conventional CT as postoperative surveillance.

METHODS

We investigated 416 patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy between January 2013 and December 2016. We compared the prognosis between the LDCT and conventional CT groups using the propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 57 months. Cancer recurrence occurred in 47 patients (11.3%). In the entire cohort (n = 416), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were better in the LDCT group (P = 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Both intrathoracic recurrence and distant metastasis were higher in the conventional group (P = 0.015 and 0.009, respectively). However, there was no statistical difference in the factors leading to recurrence detection (routine radiological examination, symptoms and elevated tumour markers: all P > 0.05). Both groups were matched using a ratio of 1:1. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.788. A total of 226 patients were successfully matched. After matching, there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups for RFS and OS (P = 0.263 and 0.226). There were also no statistical differences in recurrence rate, the factors leading to recurrence detection or recurrence site (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

After using propensity score matched, RFS and OS did not differ significantly between LDCT and conventional CT groups. Retrospective comparisons suggest no disadvantages of using LDCT for postoperative surveillance of pathological stage I NSCLC. Further validation will be needed in the future.

Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

Purpose To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, pathology, imaging, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2017. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. Results The literature search identified 222 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Recommendations Evidence-based recommendations were developed for diagnosis, staging, chemotherapy, surgical cytoreduction, radiation therapy, and multimodality therapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for a new lung cancer arising after pneumonectomy: dosimetric evaluation and pulmonary toxicity

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the tolerance of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of secondary lung tumours in patients who underwent previous pneumonectomy.

METHODS

12 patients were retrospectively analysed. The median maximum tumour diameter was 2.1 cm (1-4.5 cm). The median planning target volume was 20.7 cm(3) (2.4-101.2 cm(3)). Five patients were treated with a single fraction of 26 Gy and seven patients with fractionated schemes (3 × 10 Gy, 4 × 10 Gy, 4 × 12 Gy). Lung toxicity, correlated with volume (V) of lung receiving >5, >10 and >20 Gy, local control and survival rate were assessed. Median follow-up was 28 months.

RESULTS

None of the patients experienced pulmonary toxicity > grade 2 at the median dosimetric lung parameters of V5, V10 and V20 of 23.1% (range 10.7-56.7%), 7.3% (2.2-27.2%) and 2.7% (0.7-10.9%), respectively. No patients required oxygen or had deterioration of the performance status during follow-up if not as a result of clinical progression of disease. The local control probability at 2 years was 64.5%, and the overall survival at 2 years was 80%.

CONCLUSION

SBRT appears to be a safe and effective modality for treating patients with a second lung tumour after pneumonectomy.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Our results and similar literature results show that when keeping V5, V10 V20 <50%, <20% and <7%, respectively, the risk of significant lung toxicity is acceptable. Our experience also shows that biologically effective dose 10 >100 Gy, necessary for high local control rate, can be reached while complying with the dose constraints for most patients.

Lung cancer prognosis before and after recurrence in a population-based setting

BACKGROUND

Population-based estimates of absolute risk of lung cancer recurrence, and of mortality rates after recurrence, can inform clinical management.

METHODS

We evaluated prognostic factors for recurrences and survival in 2098 lung cancer case patients from the general population of Lombardy, Italy, from 2002 to 2005. We conducted survival analyses and estimated absolute risks separately for stage IA to IIIA surgically treated and stage IIIB to IV non-surgically treated patients.

RESULTS

Absolute risk of metastases exceeded that of local recurrence in every stage and cell type, highlighting the systemic threat of lung cancer. In stage I, the probability of dying within the first year after diagnosis was 2.7%, but it was 48.3% within first year after recurrence; in stage IV, the probabilities were 57.3% and 80.6%, respectively. Over half the patients died within one year of first metastasis. Although in stages IA to IB about one-third of patients had a recurrence, stage IIA patients had a recurrence risk (61.2%) similar to stage IIB (57.9%) and IIIA (62.8%) patients. Risk of brain metastases in stage IA to IIIA surgically treated non-small cell lung cancer patients increased with increasing tumor grade. Absolute risk of recurrence was virtually identical in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based study provides clinically useful estimates of risks of lung cancer recurrence and mortality that are applicable to the general population. These data highlight the need for more effective adjuvant treatments overall and within specific subgroups. The estimated risks of various endpoints are useful for designing clinical trials, whose power depends on absolute numbers of events.

Postoperative surveillance for non-small cell lung cancer resected with curative intent: developing a patient-centered approach

Local recurrence or the development of metachronous cancer after surgical therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not uncommon, and these conditions are often amenable to curative therapy. Predictors of recurrence based on surgical, patient, and pathologic factors are well known. A literature search was performed for articles regarding identification or treatment with curative intent of early local recurrence or metachronous cancer after resection of NSCLC. A patient-centered algorithm for surveillance after resection can be developed based on both risk of recurrence and potential benefit from further treatment to optimize individual follow-up algorithms.

Feasibility study for biweekly administration of cisplatin plus gemcitabine as adjuvant-chemotherapy for completely resected non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of biweekly administration of cisplatin and gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-arm, single-institutional study. Patients with completely resected NSCLC (p-Stages IB-IIIA) with no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy were eligible. Simon's optimal two-stage design was applied. Both cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) were given on days 1 and 15, every 28 days. The primary endpoint of this study was the feasibility of this combination in the four cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (19 lobectomies and 1 pneumonectomy) were enrolled in this study. Nine (45%) of patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia, and 6 (30%) had grade 3/4 anemia. Severe non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon in this series. No treatment-related death was encountered. Thirteen (65%) patients completed the planned 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The median intensity was 24 (range 21-25) mg/(m(2) week) with an average of 24.0 (21-25) mg/(m(2) week) cisplatin and 483 (range 412-500) mg/(m(2) week) with an average of 481.0 (412-500) mg/(m(2) week) gemcitabine. The median relative dose intensity of cisplatin was 100 (range 25-100) % with an average of 87.4 (25-100) % and that of gemcitabine was 100 (range 25-100) % with an average of 86.8 (25-100) %.

CONCLUSION

This regimen is feasible in the treatment of patients with completely resected NSCLC. A multicenter phase III trial is warranted to assess the efficacy of this regimen at promoting survival and preventing recurrence.

Isolation and characterization of radiation-resistant lung cancer D6-R cell line

OBJECTIVE

To isolate an isogenic radioresistant cancer cell line after fractioned X-ray radiation and characterize the resistant cells.

METHODS

D6 cells were exposed to repeated X-ray irradiation, and after a total dose of 5200 cGy in 8 fractions, a radioresistant monoclone D6-R was obtained. The radiosensitivity and drug sensitivity of the novel radioresistant D6-R cells, together with their parent D6 cells, were measured using clonogenic assay and MTT assay respectively. Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by flow cytometry. Fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry were applied for apoptosis detection. Comet assay was used for the detection of DNA damage and repair.

RESULTS

D6-R cells showed higher and broader initial shoulder (D0=2.08 Gy, Dq=1.64 Gy, N=2.20) than the parent D6 cells (D0=1.84 Gy, Dq=0.34 Gy, N=1.20). They were 1.65-fold more radioresistant than D6 cells in terms of SF2 (63% vs 38%) and were more resistant to ADM (3.15-fold) and 5-FU (3.86-fold) as compared with the latter. It was found that D6-R cells had higher fractions of cells in S phase (53.4% vs 37.8%) and lower fractions of cells in G1 (44.1% vs 57.2%) and G2-M phase (2.5% vs 5%). There was no difference in radiation-induced apoptosis between D6-R and D6 cells. D6-R cells showed less initial DNA damage and increased capacity in DNA repair after irradiation, as compared with the parent cells.

CONCLUSIONS

D6-R cells have been isolated by exposing the parental D6 cells to repeated irradiation. The difference in cell cycle pattern together with the induction and repair of DNA damage might, at least partially, explain the mechanism of the radioresistance.

Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, vinorelbine, and mitomycin-C followed by surgery for patients with pathologic N2 non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The treatment strategy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involving ipsilateral mediastinal lymph nodes is still controversial. We performed a phase II feasibility study of induction chemotherapy followed by surgery for patients with pathologic N2 NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with mediastinoscopy- positive stage IIIA N2 NSCLC received 2 cycles of cisplatin 80 mg/m2, vinorelbine 25 mg/m2, and mitomycin-C 8 mg/m2. Patients without progressive disease underwent thoracotomy and lobectomy with lymph node dissections 2-4 weeks later.

RESULTS

From January 2000 to July 2004, 24 eligible patients (15 men, 9 women) were enrolled. Induction chemotherapy was completed as planned in 23 patients (95.8%). Hematological toxicity was the primary grade 3/4 toxicity. Twelve (50%) patients achieved a partial response. Twenty-three patients underwent surgical resection, and complete resection was achieved in 22 patients (95.7%). There were no surgery-related deaths. Pathologic complete response in metastatic lymph nodes was achieved in 5 patients. With a median follow-up of 5.4 years (range, 2.88-7.7 years), the estimated 5-year survival was 51.8% (95% CI, 41.3-62.3) and progression-free survival was 46.6% (95% CI, 36-57.2).

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy followed by surgery for patients with pathologic N2 NSCLC was feasible and associated with high response to lymph node metastasis and good survival.

Follow-up and surveillance of the lung cancer patient following curative intent therapy: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guideline (2nd edition)

BACKGROUND

To develop an evidence-based approach to follow-up of patients after curative intent therapy for lung cancer.

METHODS

Guidelines on lung cancer diagnosis and management published between 2002 and December 2005 were identified by a systematic review of the literature, and supplemental material appropriate to this topic was obtained by literature search of a computerized database (Medline) and review of the reference lists of relevant articles.

RESULTS

Adequate follow-up by the specialist responsible for the curative intent therapy should be ensured to manage complications related to the curative intent therapy and should last at least 3 to 6 months. In addition, a surveillance program should be considered to detect recurrences of the primary lung cancer and/or development of a new primary lung cancer early enough to allow potentially curative retreatment. A standard surveillance program for these patients, coordinated by a multidisciplinary tumor board and overseen by the physician who diagnosed and initiated therapy for the original lung cancer, is recommended based on periodic visits with chest imaging studies and counseling patients on symptom recognition. Smoking cessation and, if indicated, facilitation in participation in special programs is recommended for all patients following curative intent therapy for lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence favors follow-up of complications related to curative intent therapy, and a surveillance program at regular intervals with imaging and review of symptoms. Smoking cessation after curative intent therapy to prevent recurrence of lung cancer is strongly supported by the available evidence.

Patterns of Radiotherapy Re-Treatment in Patients with Lung Cancer: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Study

INTRODUCTION

The optimal initial radiotherapy utilization rate for lung cancer is estimated to be 76% of all new cases. The actual re-treatment rate has not been defined. Re-treatment information can aid clinical decision making and resource planning. The aim of this study was to examine the indications for re-treatment in a population cohort and report the proportion of patients who receive more than one radiotherapy treatment for lung cancer throughout their lifetime.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal analysis of a cohort of patients with lung cancer treated with radiotherapy in the South Western Sydney Area Health Services (SWSAHS) in 1993 and 1996 was performed. The indication for and timing of all episodes of radiotherapy were recorded and analyzed using SPSS Data 3.5 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

Of the 527 patients diagnosed with lung cancer in the study period, 279(53%) were treated at least once with radiotherapy. Initial radiotherapy was palliative for 79%, definitive for 14%, and adjuvant for 7%. The most common sites of initial radiotherapy were chest (79%), bone (10%), and brain (9%). Of the 279 patients, 73 (27%) received treatment with a second course of radiotherapy, 19 (7%) had a third radiotherapy episode, and 6 (2%) had a fourth. One patient had five radiotherapy episodes. Overall, there were 328 radiotherapy courses delivered to the 279 patients.

DISCUSSION

The re-treatment rate for our cohort was 27%, exceeding other estimations of re-treatment. Common sites re-treated were chest and bone. Re-treatment was 17% of the initial linear accelerator treatment delivery work load for lung cancer.

Predicting postrecurrence survival among completely resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Survival after recurrence subsequent to complete resection of nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been considered a multifactorial process dependent on demographic, clinical, biological, and treatment characteristics. This study sought to quantify the prognostic effects of these characteristics on postrecurrence survival.

METHODS

Three hundred ninety NSCLC patients who underwent complete resection and subsequently had recurrent cancer were studied. The associations between characteristics of both the initial and recurrent disease with postrecurrence survival were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards models. A multivariable Cox model determined those factors most strongly associated with postrecurrence survival . A simple algorithm based on this model facilitates estimating risk of postrecurrence mortality, as quantified by risk score points.

RESULTS

The factors most strongly associated with postrecurrence survival were performance status at recurrence (3 or 4, 4.2 points; 2, 2.8 points; and 1, 1.5 points), symptoms at recurrence (3.6 points), liver recurrence (2.3 points), initial lung cancer stage IIB or worse (1.8 points), and multiple recurrences (1.0 points). Based on these factors, patients were stratified as low risk (4.0 or fewer total points), moderate-low risk (4.1 to 6.1 points), moderate-high risk (6.1 to 8.0 points), and high risk (more than 8.0 points), with 12-month survival of 75%, 51%, 25%, and 9%, respectively. Postrecurrence survival was significantly different across groups (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed prediction instrument offers clinicians a succinct tool for rapidly evaluating mortality risk after recurrence. The characteristics comprising this instrument can be easily ascertained and measured, making it of potential clinical value.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for diagnosis of recurrent nonsmall cell lung cancer

Diagnosis of recurrent lung cancer by various imaging studies is often difficult because a recurrent tumor can resemble scar tissue or postoperative changes. This article reports how an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration was used to obtain a tissue diagnosis of locoregional lung cancer recurrence, which changed the management of the patients.

Advances in the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant mesothelioma is an insidious neoplasm arising from the mesothelial surfaces of the pleural and peritoneal cavities, the pericardium, or the tunica vaginalis. A total of 80% of all cases are pleural in origin. The predominant cause of malignant mesothelioma is inhalational exposure to asbestos, although evidence is increasing to support the hypothesis that simian virus-40 virus plays a role in cocarcinogenesis. Immunohistochemical markers such as calretinin, WT-1, and cytokeratin 5/6 are becoming established diagnostic markers. Preliminary data suggests that a soluble form of mesothelin could serve as a serum marker for established and early cases of mesothelioma. Positron emission tomography with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose in conjunction with computed tomograhy scanning has improved preoperative imaging and staging. Prognostic factors have been identified and verified. Negative indicators include thrombocytosis, high leukocyte counts, poor performance status, and nonepithelial histology. For the first time, there is now evidence that some treatments are increasing the quality and quantity of life for patients with mesothelioma. Chemotherapy, with the new multi-targeted antifolate drug Pemetrexed, combined with cisplatin, has shown superior survival rates in a large phase III trial when compared to cisplatin alone. High-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy when administered after extrapleural pneumonectomy has resulted in excellent local control. Multimodality treatment programs that combine surgical cytoreduction with novel forms of radiation therapy and more effective chemotherapy combinations may offer significant increases in survival for certain subgroups of mesothelioma patients. Innovative palliative approaches have proved successful in alleviation of the significant symptoms experienced by many mesothelioma patients. Experimental treatments such as immunotherapy and gene therapy present a window of hope for all mesothelioma patients, and in the future, may be combined with 'standard therapy' in multimodality protocols. Patients with adequate performance status should be enrolled into clinical trials where possible. Over the past decade, significant advances have been made on several fronts that have improved the ability to diagnose a stage, define prognosis, and treat malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Surgical palliation of thoracic malignancies

Primary and metastatic thoracic malignancies are often incurable. Surgeons caring for these patients must be familiar with the options,indications, techniques, and limitations of interventions for palliative treatments in these patients. This article is an overview of the current practices for palliation of a broad spectrum of complaints relating to patients with carcinomas of the lung, esophagus,and mesothelium. The information can be used for treatment of patients with complaints secondary to less common malignancies and metastatic disease of the thorax.

Imaging of recurrent lung cancer

Local, regional and distant tumor recurrence is common following surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer. It is important to be familiar with the patterns of recurrence and to differentiate them from the normal post-operative appearance and post-radiation changes. The risks and types of recurrence are influenced by various factors including preoperative tumor stage, histological type and type of surgical resection. Treated patients are at risk for developing a second lung primary, reported to be 1-4% per year, and therefore follow-up must be aimed at detecting not only recurrent cancer, but also a new, primary lung cancer. Different follow-up imaging strategies have been suggested, including conventional radiography, CT and/or PET scanning.

Usefulness of low-dose spiral CT of the chest in regular follow-up of postoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients: Preliminary report

OBJECTIVES

There is no consensus for the best postoperative follow-up in patients after complete resection of non-small cell lung cancer. Low-dose computed tomography of chest proves valuable in screening primary lung cancer and may be a useful tool in postoperative surveillance.

METHODS

In part 1, 30 patients who underwent surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer and were at the first (n = 14), second (n = 9), or fifth (n = 7) annual postoperative surveillance were selected chronologically and subjected to chest radiography, low-dose computed tomography, and standard-dose computed tomography to verify the diagnostic accuracy of low-dose computed tomography. In part 2, 43 patients were prospectively enrolled and followed up regularly after complete resection of non-small cell lung cancer. The follow-up protocol included physical examination, sputum cytology, serum carcinoembryonic antigen, chest radiography, and low-dose computed tomography every 3 months in the first 2 years postoperatively until tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

In part 1, tumor recurrence was detected by standard-dose computed tomography in 7 cases. Low-dose computed tomography and chest radiography missed 1 and 5 of 7 cases, respectively. In part 2, tumor recurrence was found in 14 cases with 19 metastatic sites. Thirteen of the 14 (92.9%) cases were detected by scheduled visiting and 11 (78.6%) detected by low-dose computed tomography including the 7 without symptoms. Of the 19 recurrent sites found in 14 patients, 11 ones (57.9%) were detected by low-dose computed tomography.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose computed tomography may be of considerable value in early detection of tumor recurrence in postoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients. Further large prospective studies are needed to verify this issue.

Follow-up and surveillance of the lung cancer patient following curative-intent therapy

The following two distinctly different issues should be taken into account when planning patient care following curative-intent therapy for lung cancer: adequate follow-up to manage complications related to the curative-intent therapy; and surveillance to detect recurrences of the primary lung cancer and/or development of a new primary lung cancer early enough to allow potentially curative retreatment. Follow-up for complications should be performed by the specialist responsible for the curative-intent therapy and should last 3 to 6 months. Recurrences of the original lung cancer will be more likely during the first 2 years after curative-intent therapy, but there will be an increased lifelong risk of approximately 1 to 2% per year of developing a metachronous, or new primary, lung cancer. A standard surveillance program for these patients is recommended based on periodic visits, with chest-imaging studies and counseling patients on symptom recognition. Whether subgroups of patients with a higher risk of developing a metachronous lung cancer (eg, those patients whose primary lung cancer was radiographically occult or central and those patients surviving for > 2 years after treatment for small cell lung cancer) should have a more intensive surveillance program is presently unclear. The surveillance program should be coordinated by a multidisciplinary tumor board and overseen by the physician who diagnosed and initiated therapy for the original lung cancer. Smoking cessation is recommended for all patients following curative-intent therapy for lung cancer.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy of non-small cell lung cancer

Though surgery offers the best chance of cure for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), many patients who undergo complete tumor resection will die of recurrent disease. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been employed both individually and in combination in an effort to prevent local recurrence and extrathoracic metastatic disease. However, the administration of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy remains controversial. Phase II and III trials with traditional radiotherapy schedules and cytotoxic drugs have produced conflicting results. Novel approaches utilizing long-term administration of less toxic drugs and targeted biologic therapies are promising.

Follow-up of local (stage I and stage II) non-small-cell lung cancer after surgical resection

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is responsible for more deaths each year in the United States than is any other malignancy. Early stage disease can be cured with surgical resection. Postoperative surveillance for recurrent disease and the development of second malignancies are important parts of the overall treatment plan. Follow-up strategies have been analyzed and guidelines (most notably those of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network ) have been published. However, common practice often does not comply with these rationally developed guidelines. Understanding the general principles of effective surveillance may improve compliance with the guidelines and may lead to more cost-effective management. New methods of surveillance, postoperative risk stratification, and emerging therapies may alter these recommendations for postoperative surveillance of patients with early stage NSCLC in the future.

Postoperative irradiation in non-small cell lung cancer

A growing body of evidence suggests that postoperative irradiation for non-small cell lung cancer may cause life-threatening toxicity and, when the risk of local-regional recurrence is low, the toxicity of irradiation may outweight the benefit. However, many of these studies used outdated, even crude techniques. Although these techniques may be responsible for a significant amount of the toxicity reported in these studies, essentially no randomized or high-quality retrospective study has shown a survival benefit for postoperative irradiation for patients with N0 or N1 disease. The situation for N2 tumors is more positive. Taken as a whole, the available data suggest that, as a worst-case scenario, the net effect of adjuvant irradiation is neutral (with neither a net survival decrement nor a net advantage). As a best-case scenario, postoperative irradiation may improve the chance for long-term survival in patients with N2 tumors.

Lobectomy with tangential pulmonary artery resection without regard to pulmonary function

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell carcinoma of the lung invading the pulmonary artery (PA) has traditionally been treated by pneumonectomy. Although PA resection and reconstruction (PAR) has begun to gain acceptance, previous series of PAR by the simplest technique of tangential excision and primary repair have been unfavorable. We have maintained a policy of performing PAR preferentially whenever anatomically feasible, and usually this has been possible by tangential excision and primary repair. This study sought to determine if this approach is sound.

METHODS

Retrospective clinical and pathologic review.

RESULTS

Thirty-three PARs were performed from 1992 to 1999. The patients, followed 6 to 65 months (mean 25), were aged 36 to 80 years (mean 61), and their tumors were pathologic stage IB (n = 7), IIB (n = 13), IIIA (n = 9), and IIIB (n = 4). The mean preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 70% predicted. The procedures included 14 bronchial sleeve lobectomies with PAR and 19 simple lobectomies with PAR. The PARs were performed without heparinization and included 19 tangential excisions with primary closure, 11 larger tangential excisions with pericardial patch closure, and 3 sleeve resections. There were no operative deaths and 2 (6.1%) early major complications, all unrelated to the PAR. Thirteen patients (39%) had early minor complications. Four-year Kaplan-Meier survival was 48.3% for stages I/II and 45% for stage III. Ipsilateral, central, intrathoracic recurrence occurred in 3 patients (9.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

These data are not dramatically different from those reported for standard resections. Although the numbers are small, the results suggest that lobectomy with PAR by tangential excision is an acceptable alternative to pneumonectomy whenever anatomically possible.

A study of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized trial

PURPOSE

To study the value of postoperative radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with positive regional lymph metastases (NI or N2) after radical surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February 1982 to October 1995, 366 patients with NSCLC and N1 or N2 disease were randomized into postoperative radiotherapy (S + R) (183 patients) and no further treatment (S alone) (182 patients). Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) was administrated 3-4 weeks after radical operation. Irradiated fields covered the bronchial stump, ipsilateral hilum, and most of the mediastinum. The midplane dose was 6000 cGy/30 fractions/6 weeks, with the spinal cord limited to 4000 cGy/20 fractions/4 weeks or less. One hundred thirty-four patients in S + R group and 162 patients in S alone group were evaluated. Clinical data were comparable in both arms, except for the numbers of N2 patients.

RESULTS

The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 51.9% and 42.9% in the S + R group and 50.2% and 40.5% in the S alone Group (p = 0.56). The 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 50.7% +/- 4.7% and 42.9% +/- 5.2% in the S + R group vs. 44.4% +/- 4.3% and 38.2% +/- 4.5% in the S alone group (p = 0.28), respectively. In the patients with NI or T3-4 tumors, there was a trend toward improved survival in the S + R group, especially in the patients with T3-4N1M0. These patients demonstrated 20% improvement in overall survival (p = 0.092) and greater than 20% better disease-free survival (p = 0.057). Postoperative RT reduced local recurrence but had no impact on distant metastases.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative RT significantly reduced local relapses, but did not improve overall survival, due to a high frequency of distant metastases in this patient group.

Adjuvant therapy of resected non-small-cell lung cancer

The administration of adjuvant therapy after complete resection of non-small-cell lung cancer is controversial. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy have been used individually and concomitantly in efforts to prevent local recurrence and improve survival. However, recent phase II and III trials and a meta-analysis have produced conflicting results. Postoperative adjuvant therapy remains a subject of active investigation.

Evidence-based medicine in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

Treatment decisions for non-small-cell lung cancer require accurate initial staging of patients. Typically surgical resection is recommended for early stage disease, while chemotherapy in conjunction with radiotherapy and possibly surgical resection is recommended for selected patients with locally advanced disease. Chemotherapy clearly has been demonstrated to improve survival and quality of life in metastatic disease. Surgical, chemotherapeutic, and radiotherapy treatment options as well as the role of multi-modality therapy will be discussed focusing on the evidence for various stages of non-small-cell lung cancer.

The role of induction therapy in the management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Combined-modality therapy has become standard for many patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Although surgical resection offers the best chance for long-term survival, the limited number of resectable patients and the presence of occult micrometastatic disease has limited the effectiveness of this modality alone.

METHODS

The authors reviewed several trials involving the use of induction chemotherapy in managing resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

RESULTS

Extensive phase II experience in patients with stage III disease has confirmed the feasibility of this approach. Unfortunately, heterogeneous patient populations and treatment regimens limit the ability to draw firm conclusions from these trials alone. While the phase III experience has been limited, long-term follow-up is now available suggesting that induction therapy may have a beneficial impact on survival, especially for those patients who can be sufficiently downstaged. Recent phase II trials have included stage III patients who have traditionally been considered inoperable. Although encouraging, the role of surgery after chemoradiotherapy for this population of patients remains undefined.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from ongoing randomized trials studying the impact of induction therapy on well-defined patient populations will be necessary before the optimal regimen and patient population can be identified.

Pleuropneumonectomy in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is predominantly a local/regional disease that results in a survival time that ranges from 4 to 12 months without treatment. Single-modality therapy using surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy alone is largely ineffective. The objective of the study was presentation of the use of pleuropneumonectomy in a multimodality treatment setting and the results.

DESIGN

Didactic presentation.

SETTING

Academic tertiary-care hospital.

PATIENTS

One hundred eighty-three patients who underwent multimodality therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

Of all the single-modality treatment approaches, pleuropneumonectomy has been associated most consistently with long-term disease-free survival and has provided the greatest amount of tumor cytoreduction. The technique of pleuropneumonectomy traditionally has been linked with high perioperative mortality and morbidity when compared with that of other cytoreductive techniques such as pleurectomy/decortication. Recently, improvements in operative mortality (< 5%) have been reported, largely due to improvements in patient selection and perioperative management. Multimodality therapy, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and extrapleural pneumonectomy, was used to treat patients.

RESULTS

Outcomes were presented for 183 patients with MPM who underwent multimodality therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

With the development of multimodality therapy, pleuropneumonectomy followed by sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy has demonstrated a significant survival benefit, especially for patients who have epithelial tumor histology, tumor-free resection margins, and tumor-free extrapleural node status.