Results of recent therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastasis as the initial relapse

Efficacy and safety analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy for brain multi-metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is prone to metastasize to the brain, which is difficult for surgery and leads to poor prognosis due to poor chemotherapy efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for brain multi-metastases.

METHODS

In the retrospective study, a total of 51 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain multi-metastases (3-5 metastases) receiving SBRT in the local hospital between 2016 and 2019 were enrolled for analyzing the efficacy and safety of SBRT. The primary endpoints included 1-year local control rate, radiotherapy toxicity, overall survival and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for the enrolled patients was 21 months, and the 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 82.4% and 45.1%, respectively. Demographic analysis showed no significant differences between SBRT alone and combination with whole brain radiotherapy in clinical characteristics including age, gender and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The 1-year local control rate was 77.3% (17/22) for SBRT alone, which was comparable to 79.3% (23/29) of combined radiotherapy. Cox proportional hazard regression demonstrated that the prognostic benefit of combining WBRT was not significantly superior to SBRT alone (HR = 0.851, P= 0.263). Their radiotherapy toxicity rate was lower in SBRT alone group (13.6%, vs. 44.8% for combination; P= 0.017).

CONCLUSION

The current research suggested that SBRT alone could effectively relieve tumor burden and improve the prognosis and quality of life for NSCLC patients with brain multi-metastases, which should be validated in further prospective clinical trials.

Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

We systematically reviewed the literature for trials addressing the efficacy of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with a curative intent.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing PCI to no PCI in patients with NSCLC treated with a curative intent were eligible for inclusion. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and CENTRAL between 1946 and July 2016. We also received continual search alerts from PubMed through September 2017. Search terms included "non-small-cell lung carcinoma," "cranial irradiation," and "randomized controlled trials." We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models for relative measures of treatment effect for the incidence of brain metastasis, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). We used Parmar's methodology to derive hazard ratios (HR) when not explicitly stated in RCTs. We narratively synthesized data for the impact of PCI on quality of life (QoL) and neurocognitive function (NCF). We assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology.

RESULTS

Out of 3,548 citations captured by the search strategy, we retained 8 papers and 1 abstract, reporting on 6 eligible trials. Patients who received PCI had a significant reduction in the risk of developing brain metastases as compared with patients who did not [relative risk (RR) = 0.37; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26-0.52; moderate quality evidence]. However, there was no OS benefit (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.90-1.31; moderate quality evidence). Sensitivity analysis excluding older studies did not show substantively different findings. DFS was reported in the two most recent trials that included only stage III patients. There was significant improvement in DFS with PCI (HR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.46-0.98; high quality evidence). Two studies that reported on QoL reported no statistically significant differences. There was no significant difference in NCF decline in the only study that reported on this outcome, except in immediate and delayed recall, as assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test.

CONCLUSION

There is moderate quality evidence that the use of PCI in patients with NSCLC decreases the risk of brain metastases, but does not provide an OS benefit. However, data limited to stage III patients suggests that PCI improves DFS, with no effect on QoL.

Regression curves of brain metastases after gamma knife irradiation: Difference by tumor and patient characteristics

Regression curves and local control rates of brain metastases after gamma knife treatment were evaluated to investigate differences in tumor response to radiation. A total of 203 metastases were serially evaluated using contrast-enhanced MRI (or computed tomography) at 1, 2, 3, 4.5 and 6 months after a 20-Gy dose. Differences were evaluated in regression curves and control rates between tumors ≥10 mm and tumors <10 mm in mean diameter, among three major histological subtypes of lung cancer, among adenocarcinomas of the lung, breast and colorectum, and between tumors in patients with above and below median hemoglobin levels. Smaller tumors shrank faster and yielded better control rates than larger tumors. Metastases from small cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the lung shrank faster than those from lung adenocarcinoma, but 6-month control rates were not different. Breast adenocarcinomas tended to shrink faster than lung adenocarcinomas, but the control rates were not different among adenocarcinomas of the lung, breast and colorectum. Tumors in patients with higher hemoglobin levels tended to shrink faster but the control rates were not different. Small cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the lung regress more rapidly than adenocarcinomas, although local control rates might not differ significantly.

Successful treatment of intracardiac progression and metachronous multiple brain metastases from primary lung cancer

We report a rare case of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung extending into the left atrium via the pulmonary vein. The tumor tissue including the thrombus was resected en-bloc under cardiopulmonary bypass. Despite adjuvant chemotherapy, multiple brain metastases developed, but they were eradicated by stereotactic radiosurgery. The patient is still disease-free 48 months after the resection. This case serves to demonstrate the validity of multidisciplinary treatment for locally advanced lung cancer.

Surgery versus radiosurgery for patients with a solitary brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death in the developed countries. Patients die of local progression, disseminated disease or both. Brain metastases are often seen in non-small cell lung cancer patients and although they are frequently multiple, a subset of patients with a solitary brain metastasis (with controlled primary tumour) is regularly seen in clinical practice. Treatment of a solitary brain metastasis has usually been surgery, when possible, but the development of new stereotactic techniques of radiotherapy using a linear accelerator or the 'gamma knife' have provided new treatment options.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of surgery with that of radiosurgery, either combined with whole brain radiotherapy or administered alone, for patients with a solitary brain metastasis from successfully treated non-small cell lung cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The following electronic databases were searched: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2004 issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to present), EMBASE (1974 to present), CINAHL (1982 to present). Finally the Cochrane Lung Cancer Specialised Register was also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and controlled trials that compared surgery (with or without whole brain irradiation) with all types of radiosurgery (with or without whole brain irradiation) for solitary brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer. All other types of studies i.e.prospective or retrospective cohort studies were not considered appropriate.Studies including patients with multiple brain metastasis or diagnosed without the support of CT scan/MRI diagnostic imaging were also excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the search results to identify suitable trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Despite extensive searching no randomised trials were found. Electronic search identified 686 references. A total of 47 were selected for further evaluation but none was relevant to this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The reviewers felt that the inclusion of studies less rigorous than randomised trials would result in misleading findings. Cohort or single arm studies only provide partial information and have the risk of significant bias. From the evaluated studies, we found that a variety of different criteria were used for the definition of solitary brain metastasis. We observed that the term "single brain metastasis" was misused as synonymous with solitary brain metastasis. Some of the single arm or cohort studies come from single institutions where the availability of both techniques (radiosurgery and surgery) is not described. Therefore, a tendency to use the most accessible technique could be suspected. Finally, in order to determine which technique is superior for patients with a solitary brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer, an appropriate randomised trial should be designed. Based on the available evidence a meaningful conclusion cannot be drawn.

Does the incidence and outcome of brain metastases in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer justify prophylactic cranial irradiation or early detection?

OBJECTIVE

The radical treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) currently involves combined modality therapy (CMT) with the use of chemotherapy in addition to radiation therapy and/or surgery. Chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival, but does not alter brain relapse. We reviewed the outcomes of Stage IIIA and IIIB LA-NSCLC patients treated with CMT at our institution. We assessed the incidence of brain metastases and the management and outcome of these patients.

METHODS

Using our radiation-planning database (RSTS), we identified 230 consecutive patients from the years 1999 and 2000 who received radical radiation therapy to the lung. Extracting data from the chart, we identified 83 patients who were treated radically with chemotherapy, radiation and possibly surgery. These patients form the basis of this study.

RESULTS

At 2 years, the actuarial rates for any brain failure, first failure in the brain and sole failure in the brain were 34.2%, 24.6% and 11.0%, respectively. Age was the only factor among sex, histology, stage, weight loss and the timing of chemotherapy and radiation that predicted for an increased risk of first failure in the brain. Patients less than age 60 had a risk of 25.6% versus 11.4% for those greater than 60 (p = 0.022). Among the patients who failed first in the brain, those who had aggressive management of their brain metastases with surgical resection in addition to whole brain radiotherapy had a median survival of 26.3 months compared with 3.3 months for those treated with palliative whole brain radiotherapy alone.

CONCLUSION

Brain metastases are common in patients with LA-NSCLC treated with CMT. These patients may benefit from either prophylactic cranial irradiation or early detection and aggressive treatment of brain metastases.

Gamma knife surgery for brain metastases from lung cancer

Object. The authors conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gamma knife surgery (GKS) for the treatment of brain metastases from lung cancer.

Methods. Between February 1993 and May 2003 191 patients underwent treatment for 424 brain metastases from non—small (171 cases) and small cell lung carcinoma (20 cases). Imaging and clinical status were monitored every 3 months following the treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Cox proportional hazards regression for risk factor analysis, and nonparametric methods for evaluating tumor response were used.

There was no difference in median survival following combined whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and gamma knife surgery (14 months) and GKS alone (15 months). There was also no difference between the median survival rates for either tumor type. In the multivariate analysis, age less than 65 years, Karnofsky Performance Scale score greater than 70, normal neurological status, multiple GKS treatments, and pre-GKS craniotomy were related to longer survival.

Tumor control rates varied according to the volume of the metastases and were as follows: 84.4% (< 0.5 cm3), 94% (0.5–2 cm3), 89.1% (2–4 cm3), 93.4% (4–8 cm3), 85.7% (8–14 cm3), and 87.5% (> 14 cm3). Four lesions required post-GKS craniotomy due to swelling or rapid tumor progression. The rate of tumor shrinkage was higher when a volume was 2 cm3, lower in cystic lesions, lower in tumors with previous WBRT, and lower for margin doses less than 14 Gy.

Conclusions. The risk—benefit ratio of GKS in this series was satisfactory. There was no difference in response rates of the two tumor types, and WBRT did not improve the duration of survival.

Gamma knife surgery for brain metastases from lung cancer

OBJECT

The authors conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gamma knife surgery (GKS) for the treatment of brain metastases from lung cancer.

METHODS

Between February 1993 and May 2003 191 patients underwent treatment for 424 brain metastases from non-small (171 cases) and small cell lung carcinoma (20 cases). Imaging and clinical status were monitored every 3 months following the treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Cox proportional hazards regression for risk factor analysis, and nonparametric methods for evaluating tumor response were used. There was no difference in median survival following combined whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and gamma knife surgery (14 months) and GKS alone (15 months). There was also no difference between the median survival rates for either tumor type. In the multivariate analysis, age less than 65 years, Karnofsky Performance Scale score greater than 70, normal neurological status, multiple GKS treatments, and pre-GKS craniotomy were related to longer survival. Tumor control rates varied according to the volume of the metastases and were as follows: 84.4% (< 0.5 cm3), 94% (0.5-2 cm3), 89.1% (2-4 cm3), 93.4% (4-8 cm3), 85.7% (8-14 cm3), and 87.5% (> 14 cm3). Four lesions required post-GKS craniotomy due to swelling or rapid tumor progression. The rate of tumor shrinkage was higher when a volume was 2 cm3, lower in cystic lesions, lower in tumors with previous WBRT, and lower for margin doses less than 14 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk-benefit ratio of GKS in this series was satisfactory. There was no difference in response rates of the two tumor types, and WBRT did not improve the duration of survival.

Pattern of recurrence after curative resection of local (stage I and II) non-small cell lung cancer: difference according to the histologic type

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pattern of recurrence after complete resection of pathological stage I, II non-small cell lung cancer, especially according to the cell type. We reviewed the clinical records of 525 patients operated on for pathologic stage I and II lung cancer. The histologic type was found to be squamous in 253 and non-squamous in 229 patients. Median follow-up period was 40 months. Recurrences were identified in 173 (36%) of 482 enrolled patients; distant metastasis in 70%, distant and local recurrence in 11%, and local recurrence in 19%. Distant metastasis was more common in non-squamous than in squamous cell carcinoma (p=0.044). Brain metastasis was more frequently identified in non-squamous than in squamous cell carcinoma (24.2% vs. 7.3%. p=0.005). Multivariate analyses showed that cell type is the significant risk factor for recurrence-free survival in stage I and stage II non-small cell lung cancer. Recurrence-free survival curves showed that non-squamous cell carcinoma had similar risks during early periods of follow-up and more risks after 2 yr from the operation compared to squamous cell carcinoma. Pathological stage and histologic type significantly influence recurrence-free survival.

The role of gamma knife radiosurgery in the treatment of primary and metastatic brain tumors

With the widespread diffusion of stereotactic radiosurgical procedures, GKR treatments have gained considerable momentum as a major therapeutic option for patients harboring primary or metastatic brain tumors. Present results in high grade gliomas indicate a potential palliative role of this technique. The overall low radiosensitivity of these oncotypes and their infiltrative nature-with the resulting problems in properly defining the tumor target-are still a major obstacle to further development of the approach. In this regard, useful contributions are expected from advances in molecular neurobiology and functional neuroimaging as shown by preliminary investigations with MR spectroscopy. Surgery maintains a dominant role in the therapeutic armamentarium for low grade gliomas. However, in unfavorable cases (unresectable tumors, recurrences), GKR seems to be an effective alternative to conventional radiochemotherapy. In grade 2 astrocytomas and specifically in grade 1 pilocytic forms, short-to-mid-term reported studies have documented encouraging 70 to 93% local tumor control rates, with minimal cerebral toxicity. Finally, during the last decade, GKR has become a primary treatment choice for patients harboring small-to-medium-size brain metastases, with reasonable life expectancy and no impending intracranial hypertension. Focal tumor responses are consistently elevated, even in the most radioresistant oncotypes (melanoma, renal carcinoma); median and actuarial survival rates are far better than with conventional radiation treatments and are comparable to those observed in accurately selected surgical-radiation series.