Shahar E, Krivoy N, Pollack S. Effective acute desensitization for immediate-type hypersensitivity to human granulocyte-monocyte colony stimulating factor.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1999;
83:543-6. [PMID:
10619347 DOI:
10.1016/s1081-1206(10)62867-0]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Granulocyte-monocyte colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is the treatment of choice for patients with life threatening neutropenias. Hypersensitivity to GM-CSF may lead to cessation of treatment. Acute desensitization is an alternative mode of managing drug hypersensitivity, especially when other common modes like substitution of offending drug or premedication with antihistamines and/or corticosteroids are not available or fail.
CASE REPORT
A 42-year-old woman with a 17-year history of severe chronic mucocutaneous candidal infections became resistant to all common antifungal drugs. As her disorder was associated with defective functions of monocytes and granulocytes, GM-CSF treatment was started yielding a very good clinical effect. After a short period of treatment, however, the patient developed anaphylactic reactions which could not be abolished by preadministration of antihistamines and/or corticosteroids. Replacement of therapy by G-CSF caused identical hypersensitivity phenomena.
METHODS
Prick skin tests with 100, 200, or 400 microg/mL of GM-CSF or G-CSF, using also negative and positive controls, were performed on the patient and three healthy control subjects. A positive local reaction was observed only in patient at the prick point of 200 microg/mL GM-CSF or 400 microg/mL G-CSF. Acute desensitization to GM-CSF was initiated adopting a protocol used for parenteral desensitization to penicillin.
RESULTS
The patient tolerated the desensitization procedure very well and we could resume the administration of GM-CSF. For the past 30 months the patient has been treated uneventfully by subcutaneous administration of GM-CSF, 500 microg twice weekly, and is free of candidal infections. Skin prick tests were repeated 1 month postdesensitization and resulted in a very weak response to GM-CSF compared with the predesensitization response.
CONCLUSIONS
Acute desensitization can be utilized in patients who develop drug hypersensitivity reactions to GM-CSF. As GM-CSF is a very unique agent and in most cases cannot be replaced by another one, acute desensitization may play a very important role in managing failure of GM-CSF treatment due to hypersensitivity reactions.
Collapse