Recurring fibro-obliterative venopathy in liver allografts

Is sinusoidal obstructive syndrome a recurrent disease after liver transplantation? A case report

BACKGROUND

Sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) is a disease that damages hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells, resulting in progressive occlusion and fibrosis of the lobular central vein and the occurrence of intrahepatic sinusoidal portal hypertension. However, SOS after liver transplantation (LT) is uncommon and potentially fatal. Here, we report a rare case of second-time recurrence of SOS after liver retransplantation (rLT).

CASE SUMMARY

A 22-year-old woman received a living donor LT due to SOS. Four years later, she developed abdominal distention and ascites with no apparent cause. She was diagnosed with recurrence of SOS and underwent rLT. But 2 mo post rLT, the patient suffered from aggravated jaundice and ascites again. She was diagnosed with second-time recurrence of SOS post-rLT according to computed tomography and liver pathology. After treatment with warfarin anticoagulation and immunosuppressant conversion, she gradually recovered with improvement of liver function and liver pathology. During the 17-mo follow-up period, she was in good condition with normal liver function and no ascites.

CONCLUSION

SOS can be a recurrent disease after LT, and autoimmune antibody and genetic sequencing should be screened before LT. For susceptible patients, anticoagulant drugs should be used for an extended period, and tacrolimus or other pathogenic agents should be avoided. Early diagnosis and treatment can improve the prognosis of patients and avoid graft failure or death.

Tandem Orthotopic Living Donor Liver Transplantation Followed by Same Donor Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for DOCK8 Deficiency

BACKGROUND

An 11-year-old girl with dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) deficiency was proposed for potentially curative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the donor being her haploidentical mother. However, end-stage liver disease caused by chronic Cryptosporidium infection required liver transplantation before HSCT.

METHODS

Consequently, a staged approach of a sequential liver transplant followed by a HSCT was planned with her mother as the donor for both liver and HSCT.

RESULTS

The patient successfully underwent a left-lobe orthotopic liver transplant; however, she developed a biliary leak delaying the HSCT. Notably, the recipient demonstrated 3% donor lymphocyte chimerism in her peripheral blood immediately before HSCT. Haploidentical-related donor HSCT performed 2 months after liver transplantation was complicated by the development of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus viremia, primary graft failure, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. The patient died from sinusoidal obstruction syndrome-associated multiorgan failure with Candida sepsis on day +40 following HSCT.

CONCLUSIONS

We discuss the many considerations inherent to planning for HSCT preceded by liver transplant in patients with primary immunodeficiencies, including the role of prolonged immunosuppression and the risk of infection before immune reconstitution. We also discuss the implications of potential recipient sensitization against donor stem cells precipitated by exposure of the recipient to the donor lymphocytes from the transplanted organ.

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (hepatic veno-occlusive disease)

Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is an obliterative venulitis of the terminal hepatic venules, which in its more severe forms imparts a high risk of mortality. SOS, also known as veno-occlusive disease (VOD), occurs as a result of cytoreductive therapy prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), following oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver and treated by partial hepatectomy, in patients taking pyrrolizidine alkaloid-containing herbal remedies, and in other particular settings such as the autosomal recessive condition of veno-occlusive disease with immunodeficiency (VODI). A central pathogenic event is toxic destruction of hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells (SEC), with sloughing and downstream occlusion of terminal hepatic venules. Contributing factors are SEC glutathione depletion, nitric oxide depletion, increased intrahepatic expression of matrix metalloproteinases and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and activation of clotting factors. The clinical presentation of SOS includes jaundice, development of right upper-quadrant pain and tender hepatomegaly, ascites, and unexplained weight gain. Owing to the potentially critical condition of these patients, transjugular biopsy may be the preferred route for liver biopsy to exclude other potential causes of liver dysfunction and to establish a diagnosis of SOS. Treatment includes rigorous fluid management so as to avoid excessive fluid overload while avoiding too rapid diuresis or pericentesis, potential use of pharmaceutics such as defibrotide, coagulolytic agents, or methylprednisolone, and liver transplantation. Proposed strategies for prevention and prophylaxis include reduced-intensity conditioning radiation for HSCT, treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid, and inclusion of bevacizumab with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapeutic regimes. While significant progress has been made in understanding the pathogenesis of SOS and in mitigating against its adverse outcomes, this condition remains a serious complication of a selective group of medical treatments.

Significance of isolated hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after liver transplantation

After liver transplantation (LT), hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), which is also known as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), has been reported initially in relation to azathioprine use and subsequently in relation to acute rejection (AR). Isolated veno-occlusive disease (iVOD)/SOS raises some questions about its significance and especially its treatment. From the post-LT biopsy samples of 1364 patients (2000-2008), 31 patients with index biopsy samples showing VOD/SOS (2.3%) were identified. After a review of the index biopsy samples and previous biopsy samples, those patients not exposed to azathioprine therapy were subdivided into 2 groups according to the absence or presence of AR. Fifteen of the 31 patients had no previous evidence of AR, whereas 16 experienced episodes of AR (before or concurrently with VOD). The 2 groups were similar in terms of demographic and clinical data and the range of histological centrilobular changes. AR episodes were characterized by an endothelial predilection. iVOD/SOS occurred later than acute rejection-related veno-occlusive disease (AR-VOD)/SOS (mean times of 65 and 4.4 months, respectively, P = 0.0098). There was a tendency for iVOD/SOS to progress less frequently to chronic rejection in comparison with AR-VOD/SOS (3/15 versus 9/15, P = 0.06). The histological resolution of iVOD/SOS was significantly more frequent in patients who benefited from increased immunosuppression in comparison with those who did not (5/7 versus 2/8, P = 0.05). When the groups were considered together, the same result was obtained (14/18 versus 4/12, P = 0.024). In conclusion, despite a constant overall prevalence of VOD/SOS, the proportion of iVOD/SOS has increased. The histological resolution of iVOD/SOS after increase in immunosuppression suggests an immune-mediated origin. Better optimization of immunosuppression may be a curative treatment.

Hepatotoxicity of Chemotherapy

The selection of an antineoplastic regimen for an oncology patient is based first on the availability of effective drugs and then on a balancing of potential treatment-related toxicities with the patient's clinical condition and associated comorbidities. Liver function abnormalities are commonly observed in this patient population and identifying their etiology is often difficult. Immunosuppression, paraneoplastic phenomena, infectious diseases, metastases, and poly-pharmacy may cloud the picture. While criteria for standardizing liver injury have been established, dose modifications often rely on empiric clinical judgment. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of hepatotoxic manifestations for the most common chemotherapeutic agents is essential. We herein review the hepatotoxicity of commonly used antineoplastic agents and regimens.

Hepatotoxicity of chemotherapy

The selection of a chemotherapeutic regimen for the oncology patient is based on a thorough assessment of potential hazards relating to the patient's clinical condition and the toxicities of chemotherapy. Liver function abnormalities are commonly seen in this patient population and deducing their aetiology may be difficult. Immunosuppression, paraneoplastic phenomena, infectious disease, metastases and polypharmacy may all confound the clinical picture. While criteria for standardising liver injury have been established, dose modifications often rely on empirical clinical judgement. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of hepatotoxic manifestations for the most common chemotherapeutic agents is essential. This article reviews the hepatotoxicity of commonly utilised antineoplastic agents.