PRCC-TFE3 renal carcinomas: morphologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular analysis of an entity associated with the t(X;1)(p11.2;q21)

Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review of its Histopathology, Genetics, and Differential Diagnosis

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the predominant subtype of renal epithelial tumor, accounting for roughly 2% of all malignancies. Clinically, it often presents in the sixth to seventh decade of life, predominantly in men. Pathologically, these tumors exhibit a distinctive golden yellow cut surface, usually arising from the renal cortex. Their microscopic features are characterized by solid and nested architectures of cells with clear or eosinophilic granular cytoplasm and a prominent vascular network. A hallmark genetic feature is the inactivation of the VHL gene situated on chromosome 3p25. The majority of ccRCCs are sporadic (over 95%), typically presenting as a single mass; and a small percentage have a hereditary basis, often associated with VHL disease, characterized by multiple bilateral tumors with an earlier onset. Immunohistochemically, ccRCC tumors express PAX8, CA9 box like pattern, and CD10 but are generally negative for AMACR (35% positive) and KRT7 (15% positive). The prognosis of ccRCC is largely determined by its TNM stage, ISUP/WHO nucleolar grade, and the presence of specific aggressive features. This review article delves into the detailed gross, microscopic, molecular, and clinical features of ccRCC, offering comprehensive insights into its diagnosis, management, and prognosis.

Unusual PEComa With PRCC::TFE3 Fusion Mimicking Sinonasal Tract Melanoma

BACKGROUND

We report a nasal cavity unusual perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) mimicking mucosal melanoma.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry was performed using BenchMark Ultra and panel of antibodies. The Ion Torrent platform and Ion AmpliSeq cancer hotspot panel were utilized for DNA genotyping. Target-specific RNA libraries for the detection of fusion transcripts were constructed using Archer Universal RNA Reagent Kit v2 and Archer FusionPlex Solid Tumor panel and sequenced on the MiSeqDx instrument.

RESULTS

The tumor, diagnosed in 46-year-old female, was composed of spindle cells, and lacked pigmentation. Immunohistochemically, it showed a patchy HMB-45 positivity. Other melanocytic markers (S100 protein, Melan-A, SOX10) were negative. The tumor cells were weakly positive for KIT (CD117) while negative for smooth muscle actin, pancytokeratin cocktail (AE1/AE3), and synaptophysin. Diagnosis of primary sinonasal tract mucosal melanoma was favored. Additional molecular studies detected PRCC::TFE3 fusion as the sole genetic change, and suggested the diagnosis of unusual PEComa. Previously, TFE3 fusions were reported in a subset of PEComas but not in melanomas, while PRCC involvement has only been documented once in an ocular PEComa. Immunohistochemistry revealed strong nuclear TFE3 expression concordant with the molecular findings.

CONCLUSIONS

This report emphasis the importance of molecular testing in the differential diagnosis between PEComa and melanoma, especially when the tumor arises in a site typical of melanoma but showing an unusual morphology and immunophenotype. The detection of TFE3 fusion transcripts suggested the diagnosis of SNT PEComa, although it cannot be excluded that this and similar tumors represent a distinct diagnostic category.

The New WHO Category of "Molecularly Defined Renal Carcinomas": Clinical and Diagnostic Features and Management Implications

The evolution of classification of renal tumors has been impacted since the turn of the millennium by rapid progress in histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular genetics. Together, these features have enabled firm recognition of specific, classic types of renal cell carcinomas, such as clear cell renal cell carcinoma, that in current practice trigger histologic-type specific management and treatment protocols. Now, the fifth Edition World Health Classification's new category of "Molecularly defined renal carcinomas" changes the paradigm, defining a total of seven entities based specifically on their fundamental molecular underpinnings. These tumors, which include TFE3-rearranged, TFEB-altered, ELOC-mutated, fumarate hydratase-deficient, succinate dehydrogenase-deficient, ALK-rearranged, and SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma, encompass a wide clinical and histopathologic phenotypic spectrum of tumors. Already, important management aspects are apparent for several of these entities, while emerging therapeutic angles are coming into view. A brief, clinically-oriented introduction of the entities in this new category, focusing on relevant diagnostic, molecular, and management aspects, is the subject of this review.

TFE3 -Rearranged PEComa/PEComa-like Neoplasms : Report of 25 New Cases Expanding the Clinicopathologic Spectrum and Highlighting its Association With Prior Exposure to Chemotherapy

Since their original description as a distinctive neoplastic entity, ~50 TFE3 -rearranged perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) have been reported. We herein report 25 new TFE3 -rearranged PEComas and review the published literature to further investigate their clinicopathologic spectrum. Notably, 5 of the 25 cases were associated with a prior history of chemotherapy treatment for cancer. This is in keeping with prior reports, based mainly on small case series, with overall 11% of TFE3 -rearranged PEComas being diagnosed postchemotherapy. The median age of our cohort was 38 years. Most neoplasms demonstrated characteristic features such as nested architecture, epithelioid cytology, HMB45 positive, and muscle marker negative immunophenotype. SFPQ was the most common TFE3 fusion partner present in half of the cases, followed by ASPSCR1 and NONO genes. Four of 7 cases in our cohort with meaningful follow-up presented with or developed systemic metastasis, while over half of the reported cases either recurred locally, metastasized, or caused patient death. Follow-up for the remaining cases was limited (median 18.5 months), suggesting that the prognosis may be worse. Size, mitotic activity, and necrosis were correlated with aggressive behavior. There is little evidence that treatment with MTOR inhibitors, which are beneficial against TSC -mutated PEComas, is effective against TFE3 -rearranged PEComas: only one of 6 reported cases demonstrated disease stabilization. As co-expression of melanocytic and muscle markers, a hallmark of conventional TSC -mutated PEComa is uncommon in the spectrum of TFE3 -rearranged PEComa, an alternative terminology may be more appropriate, such as " TFE3 -rearranged PEComa-like neoplasms," highlighting their distinctive morphologic features and therapeutic implications.

Recent advances in the investigation of fusion RNAs and their role in molecular pathology of cancer

Gene fusions have had a significant role in the development of various types of cancer, oftentimes involved in oncogenic activities through dysregulation of gene expression or signalling pathways. Some cancer-associated chromosomal translocations can undergo backsplicing, resulting in fusion-circular RNAs, a more stable isoform immune to RNase degradation. This stability makes fusion circular RNAs a promising diagnostic biomarker for cancer. While the detection of linear fusion RNAs and their function in certain cancers have been described in literature, fusion circular RNAs lag behind due to their low abundance in cancer cells. This review highlights current literature on the role of linear and circular fusion transcripts in cancer, tools currently available for detecting of these chimeric RNAs and their function and how they play a role in tumorigenesis.

A nomogram based on TFE3 IHC results and clinical factors as a preliminary screening scheme for TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

TFE3 immunohistochemistry (TFE3-IHC) is controversial in the diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-rearranged RCC). This study is to investigate the accuracy and sensitivity of IHC and establish a predictive model to diagnose TFE3-rearranged RCC.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed by collecting IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results from 228 patients. IHC results were evaluated using three scoring systems. Scoring system 1 is graded based on nuclear staining intensity, scoring system 2 is graded based on the percentage of stained tumor cell nuclei, and scoring system 3 is graded based on both the nuclear staining intensity and the percentage. We collected patients' IHC results and clinical information. Important variables were screened based on univariate logistic regression analysis. Then, independent risk factors were established through multivariate logistic regression, and a nomogram model was constructed. The model was validated in internal test set and external validation set. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were generated to assess discriminative ability of the model.

RESULTS

The accuracy of IHC based on three scoring systems were 0.829, 0.772, and 0.807, respectively. The model included four factors including age, gender, lymph node metastasis and IHC results. Area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.935 for the training set, 0.934 for the internal test set, 0.933 for all 228 patients, and 0.916 for the external validation set.

CONCLUSIONS

TFE3 IHC has high accuracy in the diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged RCC. Clinical information such as age and lymph node metastasis are independent risk factors, which can be used as a supplement to the results of TFE3 IHC. This study confirms the value of IHC in the diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged RCC. The accuracy of the diagnosis can be improved by incorporating IHC with other clinical risk factors.

PEComa with ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion: expanding the molecular genetic spectrum of TFE3-rearranged PEComa with an emphasis on overlap with alveolar soft part sarcoma

AIMS

Mesenchymal neoplasms involving TFE3 gene fusions are diverse, mainly include alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) that is characterised by ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion, and a small subset of perivascular epithelioid cell tumours (PEComas) referred to as TFE3-rearranged PEComa, that most frequently harbours SFPQ::TFE3 fusion. Historically, ASPS and TFE3-rearranged PEComa are considered two distinctive entities despite their known morphological overlap. However, recent studies have suggested a potential histogenetic relationship between them, and several neoplasms that showed morphological features more closely fit PEComa rather than ASPS but harboured ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion have been documented. In this study, we report three cases of PEComa with ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinicopathological features were assessed and partner agnostic targeted next-generation sequencing on clinically validated platforms were performed. The patients are two females and one male with age at presentation ranging from 21 to 51 years. All three tumours were located in the viscera (rectum, kidney and cervix). On a relatively limited follow-up period (range = 9-15 months), all patients are alive without evidence of recurrent or metastatic disease. The neoplasms were composed of tight nested architecture of epithelioid clear cells separated by a delicate vascular network, two of which were associated with sheets of plump spindle cells, and none showed significant discohesive tumour morphology. Immunohistochemically, in addition to TFE3 protein, all three neoplasms demonstrated co-expression of melan-A and smooth muscle actin. RNA-sequencing identified ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion in all three cases that were confirmed by subsequent fluorescence in-situ hybridisation analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study expands the molecular genetic spectrum of TFE3-rearranged PEComa and further indicates its close relationship to ASPS.

Renal cell carcinoma in the contralateral kidney with TFE3 gene translocation following chemotherapy for childhood nephroblastoma: A case report and literature review

Key Clinical Message

Renal cell carcinoma as a secondary malignant neoplasm is relatively rare; however, the possibility of secondary renal cell carcinoma following chemoradiotherapy for childhood nephroblastoma should be considered.

Abstract

The occurrence of secondary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following chemoradiotherapy for nephroblastoma is relatively rare, especially in microphthalmia transcription factor family translocation renal cell carcinoma. A 13-year-old Japanese male was referred to our department for treatment of a right kidney mass. The patient had undergone open left nephrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy for nephroblastoma, 12 years before. Diagnostic imaging revealed a tumor in the right kidney and a lesion suspected to be metastasis in the left eighth rib. Chromophobe RCC or translocation RCC was suspected from the imaging pattern. TNM classification was cT1aN0M1, and the clinical stage was IV. Partial nephrectomy by robot-assisted surgery for the right renal tumor and resection of the left eighth rib were performed. Pathologically, the renal tumor was diagnosed as translocation RCC, and the rib lesion demonstrated no evidence of malignancy. We are currently undergoing imaging follow-up and the patient has been recurrence-free for 15 months. In this study, we present a rare case of secondary translocation RCC after successful treatment of nephroblastoma.

LncRNA like NMRK2 mRNA functions as a key molecular scaffold to enhance mitochondrial respiration of NONO-TFE3 rearranged renal cell carcinoma in an NAD+ kinase-independent manner

BACKGROUND

NONO-TFE3 rearranged renal cell carcinoma (NONO-TFE3 rRCC) is one of a subtype of TFE3 rRCCs with high malignancy and poor prognosis. Compared with clear cell RCC, NONO-TFE3 rRCC shows a preference for mitochondrial respiration. We recently identified that the upregulation of nicotinamide ribokinase 2 (NMRK2) was associated with enhanced mitochondrial respiration and tumor progression in TFE3 rRCC.

METHODS

A tumor-bearing mouse model was established to verify the pro-oncogenic effect of NMRK2 on NONO-TFE3 rRCC. Then the expression of NMRK2 RNA and protein was detected in cell lines and patient specimens. The NMRK2 transcripts were Sanger-sequenced and blasted at NCBI website. We constructed dCas13b-HA system to investigate the factors binding with NMRK2 RNA. We also used molecular experiments like RIP-seq, IP-MS, FISH and fluorescence techniques to explore the mechanisms that long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) like NMRK2 mRNA promoted the mitochondrial respiration of NONO-TFE3 rRCC. The efficacy of the combination of shRNA (NMRK2)-lentivirus and metformin on NONO-TFE3 rRCC was assessed by CCK-8 assay.

RESULTS

In this study, we confirmed that NMRK2 showed transcriptional-translational conflict and functioned as lncRNA like mRNA in the NONO-TFE3 rRCC. Furthermore, we revealed the molecular mechanism that NONO-TFE3 fusion suppressed the translation of NMRK2 mRNA. Most importantly, three major pathways were shown to explain the facilitation effects of lncRNA like NMRK2 mRNA on the mitochondrial respiration of NONO-TFE3 rRCC in an NAD+ kinase-independent manner. Finally, the efficacy of combination of shRNA (NMRK2)-lentivirus and metformin on NONO-TFE3 rRCC was demonstrated to be superior than either agent alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our data comprehensively demonstrated the mechanisms for the enhanced mitochondrial respiration in NONO-TFE3 rRCC and proposed lncRNA like NMRK2 mRNA as a therapy target for NONO-TFE3 rRCC.

MED15::TFE3 Renal Cell Carcinomas: Report of Two New Cases and Review of the Literature Confirming Nearly Universal Multilocular Cystic Morphology

We report two novel cases of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas with the MED15::TFE3 gene fusion in adult females aged 40 and 74 years. Both cases were extensively cystic and contained only minimal clear cells lining cysts and within septal walls, raising the differential diagnosis of multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential. By immunohistochemistry, both neoplasms labeled for PAX8, TFE3, cathepsin K and Melan A but not for HMB45. On review of the published literature and the two cases reported herein, over 90% of MED15::TFE3 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) have been described as cystic. The correlation of the MED15::TFE3 fusion with extensively cystic morphology represents the strongest association of TFE3 fusion partner with clinicopathological features among TFE3-rearranged RCC reported to date.

TFE3 gene rearrangement and protein expression contribute to a poor prognosis of renal cell carcinoma

Background

TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-rearranged RCC) is a type of kidney cancer with a low incidence, with no consensus about whether it has a worse prognosis than clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). This study attempted to elucidate the impact of TFE3-rearranged RCC by analyzing its clinical features and prognosis.

Methods

Patients treated in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (SYSMH) who were suspected to be diagnosed with TFE3-rearranged RCC were divided into two groups, TFE3-rearranged RCC and ccRCC with positive TFE3 protein expression on immunohistochemistry [TFE3(+) ccRCC], by dual-color, break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). After balancing the baseline characteristics with TFE3(+) ccRCC using the propensity score matching (PSM) method in a ratio of 2, we selected patients diagnosed with ccRCC with negative TFE3 protein expression on immunohistochemistry [TFE3(-) ccRCC]. The impact of TFE3 gene rearrangement and protein expression on renal cell carcinoma was determined by feature comparison with a nonparametric test and survival analysis with the Kaplan‒Meier method.

Results

Among 37 patients suspected of having TFE3-rearranged RCC, 13 patients were diagnosed with TFE3-rearranged RCC, and 24 patients had TFE3(+) ccRCC. The recurrence and new metastasis of TFE3-rearranged RCC was relatively common, even if the tumor stage was early at the first diagnosis. Through feature comparison and survival analysis, we found that TFE3-rearranged RCC was quite similar to TFE3(+) ccRCC. Compared with TFE3(-) ccRCC, TFE3(+) ccRCC tended to have a larger tumor diameter (P = 0.011), higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P = 0.017) and metastatic potential (P = 0.022), and worse overall survival (OS) (P = 0.043) and PFS (P = 0.016). The survival analysis showed that TFE3-rearranged RCC had a worse PFS than ccRCC (P = 0.002), and TFE3(+) RCC had a worse PFS than TFE3(-) RCC (P = 0.001). According to the stratification system based on the combination of TFE3 and lymphovascular invasion (LVI), we further found that the prognosis from good to poor was TFE3(-) LVI(-), TFE3(+) LVI(-), TFE3(+) LVI(+) and TFE3(-) LVI(+), with statistically significant differences in both OS (P = 0.001) and PFS (P < 0.001). In addition, we also reported two cases with poor prognosis, of which one was TFE3-rearranged RCC and the other was TFE3(+) ccRCC.

Conclusions

This is a novel finding that both FISH confirmed TFE3 gene rearrangement-mediated TFE3-rearranged RCC and IHC confirmed positive TFE3 protein expression [TFE3(+)] contribute to a poor prognosis in RCC, suggesting more active treatment and careful follow-up for TFE3(+) RCC patients. The combination of TFE3 and LVI may be a new risk stratification system for RCC.

Estrogen associates with female predominance in Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma

Based on the epidemiological characteristics of susceptibility and age selectivity for women in Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 tRCC), we inferred that estrogen was to be blamed. Rad54 like 2 (Rad54l2) which might be one of key effector proteins of DNA damage mediated by estrogen was downregulated in numerous cancers, however, its role in epidemiological characteristics of Xp11.2 tRCC was needed to further study. We reviewed 1005 Xp11.2 tRCC cases and collected estrogen data and then compared the onset time of Xp11.2 tRCC cases in female with estrogen changing trend. An RNA-sequencing was performed in estrogen treated HK-2 cells and subsequently bioinformatic analysis was applied based on the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and GEO database. The male-to-female ratio of Xp11.2 tRCC was 1:1.4 and the median age of onset was 29.7 years old. The onset trend of female was similar to estrogen physiological rhythm (r = 0.67, p < 0.01). In Xp11.2 tRCC and HK-2 cells after estrogen treatment, Rad54l2 was downregulated, and GSEA showed that pathways significantly enriched in DNA damage repair and cancer related clusters after estrogen treated, as well as GO and KEGG analysis. Downregulation of Rad54l2 was in numerous cancers, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), in which Rad54l2 expression was significantly decreased in male, age over 60 years old, T2&T3&T4 stages, pathologic SII&SIII&SIV stages as well as histologic G3&G4 grades, and cox regression analysis proved that Rad54l2 expression was a risk factor for overall survival, disease-specific survival and progression-free interval in univariate analysis. There existed female predominance in Xp11.2 tRCC and Rad54l2 might play vital role in estrogen mediating female predominance in Xp11.2 tRCC.

Clinical and pathological heterogeneity of four common fusion subtypes in Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma

Background

Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 tRCC) is a group of rare and highly heterogeneous renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The translocation involving TFE3 and different fusion partners lead to overexpression of the chimeric protein. The purpose of this study is to explore the clinicopathological features of Xp11.2 tRCC with four common fusion subtypes.

Methods

We screened out 40 Xp11.2 tRCC patients from January 2007 to August 2021 in our institution. The diagnosis was initially confirmed by TFE3 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay and their fusion partners were verified by RNA sequencing. Then the 40 cases were divided into two groups (DBHS family and non-DBHS family group) and a clinical comparison among the four common fusion subtypes was performed.

Results

Among the 40 cases, 11 cases with SFPQ-TFE3 gene fusion and 7 cases with NONO-TFE3 gene fusion were classified in DBHS group, the remaining cases with ASPL-TFE3 (11 cases) or PRCC-TFE3 (11 cases) gene fusion were classified in non-DBHS group. Lymph node (LN) metastasis (P=0.027) and distant metastasis (P=0.009) were more common seen in non-DBHS family group than DBHS family group and cases in DBHS family group have better progressive-free survival (PFS) (P=0.02). In addition, ASPL-TFE3 fusion was associated with worse outcome (P=0.03) while NONO-TFE3 fusion (P=0.04) predicted a better prognosis.

Conclusions

Different fusion partner genes may play a functional role in various morphology, molecular and biological features of Xp11.2 tRCCs. The impact of fusion partners on clinical characteristics of Xp11.2 tRCCs deserves further exploration.

A central role for regulated protein stability in the control of TFE3 and MITF by nutrients

The TFE3 and MITF master transcription factors maintain metabolic homeostasis by regulating lysosomal, melanocytic, and autophagy genes. Previous studies posited that their cytosolic retention by 14-3-3, mediated by the Rag GTPases-mTORC1, was key for suppressing transcriptional activity in the presence of nutrients. Here, we demonstrate using mammalian cells that regulated protein stability plays a fundamental role in their control. Amino acids promote the recruitment of TFE3 and MITF to the lysosomal surface via the Rag GTPases, activating an evolutionarily conserved phospho-degron and leading to ubiquitination by CUL1β-TrCP and degradation. Elucidation of the minimal functional degron revealed a conserved alpha-helix required for interaction with RagA, illuminating the molecular basis for a severe neurodevelopmental syndrome caused by missense mutations in TFE3 within the RagA-TFE3 interface. Additionally, the phospho-degron is recurrently lost in TFE3 genomic translocations that cause kidney cancer. Therefore, two divergent pathologies converge on the loss of protein stability regulation by nutrients.

Proteogenomic characterization of MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma

Microphthalmia transcription factor (MiT) family translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) is a rare type of kidney cancer, which is not well characterized. Here we show the comprehensive proteogenomic analysis of tRCC tumors and normal adjacent tissues to elucidate the molecular landscape of this disease. Our study reveals that defective DNA repair plays an important role in tRCC carcinogenesis and progression. Metabolic processes are markedly dysregulated at both the mRNA and protein levels. Proteomic and phosphoproteome data identify mTOR signaling pathway as a potential therapeutic target. Moreover, molecular subtyping and immune infiltration analysis characterize the inter-tumoral heterogeneity of tRCC. Multi-omic integration reveals the dysregulation of cellular processes affected by genomic alterations, including oxidative phosphorylation, autophagy, transcription factor activity, and proteasome function. This study represents a comprehensive proteogenomic analysis of tRCC, providing valuable insights into its biological mechanisms, disease diagnosis, and prognostication.

Minimally invasive cytologic evaluation leading to the diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma: A case report

TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been categorized as a molecularly defined renal carcinoma in the 2022 WHO classification of tumors as it does not demonstrate a specific genotype-phenotype correlation. However, in order to arrive at the diagnosis, recognition of the broad spectrum of cytologic and histologic features that can be seen in TFE3-rearranged RCC is important for differential diagnostic consideration. Reported here is the diagnostic workup of a TFE3-rearranged RCC using very limited tissue sample. The initial evaluation was dependent on the cytomorphologic findings observed on a touch preparation made from the renal mass biopsy, directing appropriate selection of ancillary tests, and leading to a definitive diagnosis.

Xanthomatous Giant Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Another Morphologic Form of TSC-associated Renal Cell Carcinoma

Over the past decade, several distinct novel renal epithelial neoplasms driven by underlying tuberous sclerosis comples (TSC)/mammalian target of rapamycin (MTOR) pathway mutations have been described. We report herein two distinctive TSC2-mutated renal cell carcinomas which do not fit any previously described entity. The two renal carcinomas occurred in young patients (ages 10 and 31 y), and were characterized by highly permeative growth within the kidney with metastases to perirenal lymph nodes. The neoplastic cells were predominantly large, multinucleated giant cells having variably eosinophilic to xanthomatous cytoplasm with basophilic stippling and frequent vacuolization. While the discohesive nature of the neoplastic cells, xanthomatous cytoplasm, immunoreactivity for histiocytic markers and minimal immunoreactivity for conventional epithelial markers raised the possibility of a histiocytic neoplasm, multifocal immunoreactivity for cytokeratin 20 helped establish their epithelial nature. Despite the aggressive growth pattern of these neoplasms and lymph node metastases, mitotic figures were rare and Ki-67 indices were low (<1%). One patient with follow-up shows no evidence of disease seven years after nephrectomy with no adjuvant therapy. Next-generation sequencing demonstrated TSC2 mutations in each case. By immunohistochemistry, downstream markers of mTOR pathway activation S6K1, 4EBP1, and glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B were all highly expressed in these neoplasms, suggesting mTOR pathway activation as the neoplastic driver. While the cytokeratin 20 immunoreactivity and focal basophilic cytoplasmic stippling suggest a relationship to eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma, and cytoplasmic vacuolization suggests a relationship to eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, these neoplasms appear to be distinctive given their permeative growth patterns and predominant xanthomatous giant cell morphology. Addition of cytokeratin 20 to a panel of epithelial markers helps avoid misdiagnosis in such cases.

PEComa-like Neoplasms Characterized by ASPSCR1-TFE3 Fusion: Another Face of TFE3-related Mesenchymal Neoplasia

Identical TFE3-related gene fusions may be found in renal cell carcinoma and mesenchymal neoplasms such as alveolar soft part sarcoma and TFE3-rearranged perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa). Among mesenchymal neoplasms, the ASPSCR1-TFE3 gene fusion has previously been described only in alveolar soft part sarcoma. We report 3 unusual mesenchymal neoplasms harboring the ASPSCR1-TFE3 gene fusion, the morphologic phenotype of which more closely matches PEComa rather than alveolar soft part sarcoma. All 3 neoplasms occurred in females ranging in age from 18 to 34 years and were located in the viscera (kidney, bladder, and uterus). All 3 contained nests of epithelioid cells bounded by fibrovascular septa. However, all were associated with hyalinized stroma, tight nested architecture, mixed spindle cell and epithelioid pattern, clear cytoplasm, and lacked significant discohesion. Overall, morphologic features closely resembled PEComa, being distinct from the typical alveolar soft part sarcoma phenotype. While none of the neoplasms labeled for HMB45, cytokeratin, or PAX8 all showed positivity for TFE3 and cathepsin K, and all except 1 were positive for smooth muscle actin. One patient developed a liver metastasis 7 years after nephrectomy. These cases bridge the gap between 2 TFE3-rearranged neoplasms, specifically alveolar soft part sarcoma and Xp11 translocation PEComa, highlighting the relatedness and overlap among Xp11 translocation neoplasms. While most TFE3-rearranged neoplasms can be confidently placed into a specific diagnostic category such as alveolar soft part sarcoma, PEComa, or Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma, occasional cases have overlapping features, highlighting the potential role that the cell of origin and the specific gene fusion play in the phenotype of these neoplasms.

TFE3 Rearrangement and Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma

TFE3 rearranged Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is not very common, and demonstrates unique heterogenous morphological features overlapping other recognized entities and distinct immunoprofile. It can be seen in any age group, therefore practicing pathologists should be aware of the distinctive clinical settings and histologic findings associated with these tumors and subsequently employ an adequate panel of ancillary studies in order to confirm the diagnosis. Recognizing these entities remains crucial for future clinical trials and development of novel therapies.

5mC and H3K9me3 of TRAF3IP2 promoter region accelerates the progression of translocation renal cell carcinoma

Background

In our previous study, we found that lncRNA TRAF3IP2 antisense RNA 1 (TRAF3IP2-AS1) could play a critical role in the progression of NONO-TFE3 translocation renal cell carcinoma (NONO-TFE3 tRCC). However, the function of TRAF3IP2 (TRAF3 interacting protein 2), encoded by the complementary strand of TRAF3IP2-AS1, remains poorly understood in NONO-TFE3 tRCC.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry, western blot, and qRT-PCR were undertaken to study the expression and clinical significance of TRAF3IP2 in Xp11.2 tRCC tissues and cells. The functions of TRAF3IP2 in tRCC were investigated by proliferation analysis, EdU staining, colony and sphere formation assay, Transwell assay, and apoptosis analysis. The regulatory mechanisms among TRAF3IP2, NOTCH1, and TRAF3IP2-AS1 were investigated by luciferase assay, RNA immunoprecipitation, western blot, methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation, and CRISPR/dCas9-based system.

Results

The results showed that TRAF3IP2 was highly expressed in NONO-TFE3 tRCC tissues and cells, and the silence of TRAF3IP2 inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of UOK109 cells which were derived from cancer tissue of patient with NONO-TFE3 tRCC. Mechanistic studies revealed that TRAF3IP2 functioned as a co-activator of NOTCH1 to activate the NOTCH1 pathway. Meanwhile, HNRNPK, DNMT1 and SETDB1 could be recruited by TRAF3IP2-AS1 to the promoter region of TRAF3IP2, which mediated 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5mC) on DNA and trimethylated lysine 9 of histone H3 (H3K9me3) at transcriptional level to repress the expression of TRAF3IP2.

Conclusions

TRAF3IP2 functions as an oncogene in NONO-TFE3 tRCC progression and might serve as a novel target for NONO-TFE3 tRCC therapy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40364-022-00402-3.

MiTF/TFE Translocation Renal Cell Carcinomas: From Clinical Entities to Molecular Insights

MiTF/TFE translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of RCC representing the most prevalent RCC in the pediatric population (up to 40%) and making up 4% of all RCCs in adults. It is characterized by translocations involving either TFE3 (TFE3-tRCC), TFEB (TFEB-tRCC) or MITF, all members of the MIT family (microphthalmia-associated transcriptional factor). TFE3-tRCC was first recognized in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of kidney cancers in 2004. In contrast to TFEB-tRCC, TFE3-tRCC is associated with many partners that can be detected by RNA or exome sequencing. Both diagnoses of TFE3 and TFEB-tRCC are performed on morphological and immunohistochemical features, but, to date, TFE break-apart fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) remains the gold standard for diagnosis. The clinical behavior of tRCC is heterogeneous and more aggressive in adults. Management of metastatic tRCC is challenging, especially in the younger population, and data are scarce. Efficacy of the standard of care-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors remains low. Recent integrative exome and RNA sequencing analyses have provided a better understanding of the biological heterogeneity, which can contribute to a better therapeutic approach. We describe the clinico-pathological entities, the response to systemic therapy and the molecular features and techniques used to diagnose tRCC.

Chameleon TFE3-translocation RCC and How Gene Partners Can Change Morphology: Accurate Diagnosis Using Contemporary Modalities

Translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) with TFE3 gene rearrangements has been born as a distinct entity 20 years ago. These relatively rare tumors were notable among other RCC subtypes because of their disproportionally high incidence among children and young adults. Initial reports were focused on describing unifying morphologic criteria and typical clinical presentation. Follow-up studies of ancillary immunohistochemical and hybridization techniques provided additional diagnostic tools allowing recognition of tRCC tumors in practice. However, a growing body of literature also expanded the clinicomorphologic spectrum of tRCCs, to include a significant morphologic overlap with other RCC variants thus blurring the diagnostic clarity of this entity. More recent molecular studies utilizing next-generation sequencing technology accelerated recognition of numerous novel gene partners fusing at different breakpoints with the TFE3 gene. Accumulating data indicates that morphologic and clinical heterogeneity of tRCC could be explained by fusion subtypes, and knowledge of TFE3 partnering genes may be important in predicting tumor behavior. Herein we provided a comprehensive analysis of ∼400 tRCC cases with known TFE3 fusion partners, estimated their relative incidence and summarized clinicomorphologic features associated with most common fusion subtypes. Our data was based on an extensive literature review and had a special focus on comparing immunohistochemistry, fluorescent in situ hybridization and contemporary molecular studies for the accurate diagnosis of tRCC.

Both SUMOylation and ubiquitination of TFE3 fusion protein regulated by androgen receptor are the potential target in the therapy of Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma

Background

The aggressiveness of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion (Xp11.2 translocation RCC [Xp11.2 tRCC]) is age‐dependent, which is similar to the overall trend of reproductive endocrine hormones. Therefore, this study focused on the effect and potential mechanism of androgen and androgen receptor (AR) on the progression of Xp11.2 tRCC.

Methods

The effects of androgen and AR on the proliferation and migration of Xp11.2 tRCC cells were first evaluated utilising Xp11.2 tRCC cell lines and tissues. Because Transcription factor enhancer 3 (TFE3) fusion proteins play a key role in Xp11.2 tRCC, we focused on the regulatory role of AR and TFE3 expression and transcriptional activity.

Results

When Xp11.2 tRCC cells were treated with dihydrotestosterone, increased cell proliferation, invasion and migration were observed. Compared with clear cell RCC, the positive rate of AR in Xp11.2 tRCC tissues was higher, and its expression was negatively associated with the progression‐free survival of Xp11.2 tRCC. Further studies revealed that AR could positively regulate the transcriptional activity of TFE3 fusion proteins by small ubiquitin‐related modifier (SUMO)‐specific protease 1, inducing the deSUMOylation of TFE3 fusion. On the other hand, UCHL1 negatively regulated by AR plays a role in the deubiquitination degradation of the PRCC‐TFE3 fusion protein. Therefore, the combination of the AR inhibitor MDV3100 and the UCHL1 inhibitor 6RK73 was effective in delaying the progression of Xp11.2 tRCC, especially PRCC‐TFE3 tRCC.

Conclusions

Androgen and AR function as facilitators in Xp11.2 tRCC progression and may be a novel therapeutic target for Xp11.2 tRCC.

The combined use of AR antagonist MDV3100 and UCHL1 inhibitor 6RK73 increased both the SUMOylation and ubiquitination of the PRCC‐TFE3 fusion protein

Characteristics and outcome of children with renal tumors in the Netherlands: The first five-year's experience of national centralization

Around 6% of all childhood malignancies represent renal tumors, of which a majority includes Wilms tumor (WT). Although survival rates have improved over the last decades, specific patients are still at risk for adverse outcome. In the Netherlands, since 2015, pediatric oncology care for renal tumors has been centralized in the Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology. Here, we describe experiences of the first 5 years of centralized care and explore whether this influences the epidemiological landscape by comparing data with the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). We identified all patients <19 years with a renal mass diagnosed between 01-01-2015 and 31-12-2019 in the Princess Máxima Center. Epidemiology, characteristics and management were analyzed. We identified 164 patients (including 1 patient who refused consent for registration), in our center with a suspicion of a renal tumor. The remaining 163 cases included WT (n = 118)/cystic partially differentiated nephroblastoma (n = 2)/nephrogenic rests only (n = 6) and non-WT (n = 37). In this period, the NCR included 138 children, 1 17-year-old patient was not referred to the Princess Máxima Center. Central radiology review (before starting treatment) was performed in 121/163 patients, and central pathology review in 148/152 patients that underwent surgery. Treatment stratification, according to SIOP/EpSSG protocols was pursued based on multidisciplinary consensus. Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 133 patients, whereas 19 patients underwent upfront surgery. Surgery was performed in 152 patients, and from 133 biomaterial was stored. Centralization of care for children with renal tumors led to referral of all but 1 new renal tumor cases in the Netherlands, and leads to referral of very rare subtypes not registered in the NCR, that benefit from high quality diagnostics and multidisciplinary decision making. National centralization of care led to enhanced development of molecular diagnostics and other innovation-based treatments for the future.

A genetic screen in C. elegans reveals roles for KIN17 and PRCC in maintaining 5' splice site identity

Pre-mRNA splicing is an essential step of eukaryotic gene expression carried out by a series of dynamic macromolecular protein/RNA complexes, known collectively and individually as the spliceosome. This series of spliceosomal complexes define, assemble on, and catalyze the removal of introns. Molecular model snapshots of intermediates in the process have been created from cryo-EM data, however, many aspects of the dynamic changes that occur in the spliceosome are not fully understood. Caenorhabditis elegans follow the GU-AG rule of splicing, with almost all introns beginning with 5’ GU and ending with 3’ AG. These splice sites are identified early in the splicing cycle, but as the cycle progresses and “custody” of the pre-mRNA splice sites is passed from factor to factor as the catalytic site is built, the mechanism by which splice site identity is maintained or re-established through these dynamic changes is unclear. We performed a genetic screen in C. elegans for factors that are capable of changing 5’ splice site choice. We report that KIN17 and PRCC are involved in splice site choice, the first functional splicing role proposed for either of these proteins. Previously identified suppressors of cryptic 5’ splicing promote distal cryptic GU splice sites, however, mutations in KIN17 and PRCC instead promote usage of an unusual proximal 5’ splice site which defines an intron beginning with UU, separated by 1nt from a GU donor. We performed high-throughput mRNA sequencing analysis and found that mutations in PRCC, and to a lesser extent KIN17, changed alternative 5’ splice site usage at native sites genome-wide, often promoting usage of nearby non-consensus sites. Our work has uncovered both fine and coarse mechanisms by which the spliceosome maintains splice site identity during the complex assembly process.

Pre-messenger RNA splicing is an important regulator of eukaryotic gene expression, changing the content, frame, and functionality of both coding and non-coding transcripts. Our understanding of how the spliceosome chooses where to cut has focused on the initial identification of splice sites. However, our results suggest that the spliceosome also relies on other components in later steps to maintain the identity of the splice donor sites. We are currently in the midst of a “resolution revolution”, with ever-clearer cryo-EM snapshots of stalled complexes, allowing researchers to visualize moments in time in the splicing cycle. These models are illuminating, but do not always elucidate mechanistic functioning of a highly dynamic ribonucleoprotein complex. Therefore, our lab takes a complementary approach, using the power of genetics in a multicellular animal to gain functional insights into the spliceosome. Using a C.elegans genetic screen, we have found novel functional splicing roles for two proteins, KIN17 and PRCC. Mutations in PRCC in particular promote nearby alternative 5’ splice sites at native loci. This work improves our understanding of how the spliceosome maintains the identity of where to cut the pre-mRNA, and thus how genes are expressed and used in multicellular animals.

TFE3 and TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinomas: an immunohistochemical panel to differentiate from common renal cell neoplasms

TFE3/TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinomas are characterized by translocations involving TFE3 and TFEB genes. Despite the initial description of typical morphology, their histological spectrum is wide, mimicking common subtypes of renal cell tumors. Thus, the diagnosis is challenging requiring the demonstration of the gene rearrangement, usually by FISH. However, this technique is limited in most laboratories and immunohistochemical TFE3/TFEB analysis is inconsistent. We sought to identify a useful immunohistochemical panel using the most common available markers to recognize those tumors. We performed an immunohistochemical panel comparing 27 TFE3-rearranged and 10 TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinomas to the most common renal cell tumors (150 clear cell, 100 papillary, 50 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, 18 clear cell papillary renal cell tumors, and 50 oncocytomas). When dealing with neoplasms characterized by cells with clear cytoplasm, CA9 is a helpful marker to exclude clear cell renal cell carcinoma. GATA3, AMACR, and CK7 are useful to rule out clear cell papillary renal cell tumor. CK7 is negative in TFE3/TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinoma and positive in papillary renal cell carcinoma, being therefore useful in this setting. Parvalbumin and CK7/S100A1 respectively are of paramount importance when TFE3/TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinoma resembles oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Moreover, in TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinoma, cathepsin K and melanogenesis markers are constantly positive, whereas TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma stains for cathepsin K in roughly half of the cases, HMB45 in 8% and Melan-A in 22%. In conclusion, since TFE3/TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinoma may mimic several histotypes, an immunohistochemical panel to differentiate them from common renal cell tumors should include cathepsin K, CA9, CK7, and parvalbumin.

Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma With TFE3 Rearrangement: Distinct Morphological Features and Prognosis With Different Fusion Partners

Background

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion is a rare and new subtype of RCC and was classified by the WHO in 2004. Since then, multiple 5′ fusion partners for TFE3 have been reported; however, the impact of individual fusion variant on specific clinicopathologic features of Xp11.2 RCCs has not been well defined.

Methods

Four Xp11.2 translocation RCCs were identified by morphological, immunostaining, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays from 200 patients who attended Guangdong General Hospital between January 2017 and January 2020. All these four cases were further analyzed by RNA sequencing to explore their TFE3 gene fusion partners. The clinicopathologic features, including clinical manifestations, pathological findings, treatment strategies, clinical outcomes, and follow-up information on Xp11.2 translocation RCCs, were recorded and evaluated.

Results

These four cases affected one male and three females. The median age was 13 years at the time of diagnosis (range = 4–20 years). All the examined tumors were unilateral and unifocal. The largest diameter of these tumors ranged from 2.0 to 10.0 cm, and the average was 5.55 cm. Regional lymph node or distant metastasis developed in two patients. Three cases demonstrated known fusions: ASPCR1–TFE3 (two cases) and PRCC–TFE3 (one case). However, one case showed an unreported VCP–TFE3 fusion gene in Xp11.2 translocation RCCs. Immunohistochemistry results revealed tumor cells diffusely positive for TFE3, but have no consistency in other markers. Moreover, there were different clinical prognoses among the different variant TFE3 rearrangements; RCC patients with VCP–TFE3 translocation had worse prognosis compared to those with other fusion types. Follow-up were available for all the patients and ranged from 3 to 36 months. Three patients were without evidence of disease progression, while that with VCP–TFE3 fusion died of the disease 3 months after the diagnosis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our data expand the list of TFE3 gene fusion partners and the clinicopathologic features of Xp11.2 RCCs with specific TFE3 gene fusions. We identified a novel VCP–TFE3 fusion in Xp11.2 translocation RCCs for the first time, which has unique morphology and worse prognosis than those with other variant TFE3 rearrangements. Integration of morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular methods is often necessary for the precise diagnosis and optimal clinical management of malignant tumors.

Translocation carcinomas of the kidney

The MiT subfamily of transcription factors includes TFE3, TFEB, TFEC, and MITF. Gene fusions involving two of these transcription factors have been well-characterized in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The TFE3-rearranged RCC (also known as Xp11 translocation RCC) was first officially recognized in the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) renal tumor classification. The TFEB-rearranged RCC, which typically harbor a t(6;11)(p21;q12) translocation which results in a MALAT1-TFEB gene fusion, were first officially recognized in the 2016 WHO renal tumor classification. These two subtypes of translocation RCC have many similarities. Both disproportionately involve young patients, although adult translocation RCC overall outnumber pediatric cases. Both often have unusual and distinctive morphologies; the TFE3-rearranged RCCs frequently have clear cells with papillary architecture and abundant psammoma bodies, while the TFEB-rearranged RCCs frequently have a biphasic appearance with both small and large epithelioid cells and nodules of basement membrane material. However, the morphology of these two neoplasms can overlap, with one mimicking the other or other more common renal neoplasms. Both of these RCC underexpress epithelial immunohistochemical markers, such as cytokeratin and epithelial membrane antigen, relative to most other RCC. Unlike other RCC, both frequently express the cysteine protease cathepsin k and often express melanocytic markers like HMB45 and Melan A. Finally, TFE3 and TFEB have overlapping functional activity as these two transcription factors frequently heterodimerize and bind to the same targets. Therefore, these two neoplasms are now grouped together under the heading of "MiT family translocation RCC." Approximately 50 renal cell carcinomas with gene fusions involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene have now been reported. While those with a Vinculin-ALK fusion have distinctive features (predilection to affect children with sickle cell trait and to show solid architecture with striking cytoplasmic vacuolization), other ALK-fusion RCCs have more varied clinical presentations and pathologic features. This review summarizes our current knowledge of these recently described RCC.

Key Renal Neoplasms With a Female Predominance

Renal neoplasms largely favor male patients; however, there is a growing list of tumors that are more frequently diagnosed in females. These tumors include metanephric adenoma, mixed epithelial and stromal tumor, juxtaglomerular cell tumor, mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma, Xp11.2 (TFE3) translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma, and tuberous sclerosis complex (somatic or germline) associated renal neoplasms. The latter category is a heterogenous group with entities still being delineated. Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma is the best-described entity, whereas, eosinophilic vacuolated tumor is a proposed entity, and the remaining tumors are currently grouped together under the umbrella of tuberous sclerosis complex/mammalian target of rapamycin-related renal neoplasms. The entities described in this review are often diagnostic considerations when evaluating renal mass tissue on biopsy or resection. For example, Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma is in the differential when a tumor has clear cell cytology and papillary architecture and occurs in a young or middle-aged patient. In contrast, tuberous sclerosis complex-related neoplasms often enter the differential for tumors with eosinophilic cytology. This review provides an overview of the clinical, gross, microscopic, immunohistochemical, genetic, and molecular alterations in key renal neoplasms occurring more commonly in females; differential diagnoses are also discussed regardless of sex predilection.

New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia

The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) reviewed recent advances in renal neoplasia, particularly post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, to provide an update on existing entities, including diagnostic criteria, molecular correlates, and updated nomenclature. Key prognostic features for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain WHO/ISUP grade, AJCC/pTNM stage, coagulative necrosis, and rhabdoid and sarcomatoid differentiation. Accrual of subclonal genetic alterations in clear cell RCC including SETD2, PBRM1, BAP1, loss of chromosome 14q and 9p are associated with variable prognosis, patterns of metastasis, and vulnerability to therapies. Recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines increasingly adopt immunotherapeutic agents in advanced RCC, including RCC with rhabdoid and sarcomatoid changes. Papillary RCC subtyping is no longer recommended, as WHO/ISUP grade and tumor architecture better predict outcome. New papillary RCC variants/patterns include biphasic, solid, Warthin-like, and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity. For tumors with 'borderline' features between oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC, a term "oncocytic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, not further classified" is proposed. Clear cell papillary RCC may warrant reclassification as a tumor of low malignant potential. Tubulocystic RCC should only be diagnosed when morphologically pure. MiTF family translocation RCCs exhibit varied morphologic patterns and fusion partners. TFEB-amplified RCC occurs in older patients and is associated with more aggressive behavior. Acquired cystic disease (ACD) RCC-like cysts are likely precursors of ACD-RCC. The diagnosis of renal medullary carcinoma requires a negative SMARCB1 (INI-1) expression and sickle cell trait/disease. Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) can be distinguished from papillary RCC with overlapping morphology by losses of chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, and 22. MTSCC with adverse histologic features shows frequent CDKN2A/2B (9p) deletions. BRAF mutations unify the metanephric family of tumors. The term "fumarate hydratase deficient RCC" ("FH-deficient RCC") is preferred over "hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC syndrome-associated RCC". A low threshold for FH, 2SC, and SDHB immunohistochemistry is recommended in difficult to classify RCCs, particularly those with eosinophilic morphology, occurring in younger patients. Current evidence does not support existence of a unique tumor subtype occurring after chemotherapy/radiation in early childhood.

Multidrug refractory aggressive metastatic TFE3 (+) renal cell carcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Transcription factor E3 (TFE3) related renal cell carcinomas constitute a very small percent of all renal tumors in adults. Prognosis mainly depends on the stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis which is often poor. There is yet to be a standardized treatment protocol. Treatment options include agents identical to TFE3(-) cell renal carcinoma treatment. We present a case of a young woman with a rapidly progressing metastatic TFE3 (+) renal cell carcinoma.

CASE REPORT

A 31 year old female presented with abdominal mass, distension, nausea. Initial tests and tumor markers found to be normal. Abdominal CT scan revealed a left retroperitoneal mass along with three other neighboring masses in liver manifesting as metastases. Trucut biopsy and immunohistochemical staining confirmed the retroperitoneal mass as TFE3 (+) renal cell carcinoma.Management and outcome: Sunitinib, pazopanib, nivolumab, axitinib treatments are consecutively given after surgery. It is noteworthy that rapid progression was observed under nivolumab treatment.

DISCUSSION

During surveillance, rapid progression is noted under consecutive immunotherapy which was unexpected. Thus, there is a need for more standardized treatment protocols and invention of new agents for management of TFE3 (+) renal cell carcinoma.

Renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/transcription factor E3 gene fusion: an adult case report and literature review

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) associated with Xp11.2 translocation/transcription factor E3 (TFE3) gene fusion is a rare and independent subtype of RCC included in the classification of MiT (microphthalmia-associated transcriptional factor) family translocation RCC. Herein, we report an adult case of Xp11.2 translocation RCC, and review the relevant literature to improve our understanding of the pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, treatment, and other aspects of the disease.

Nuclear translocation of ASPL-TFE3 fusion protein creates favorable metabolism by mediating autophagy in translocation renal cell carcinoma

The ASPL-TFE3 fusion gene, resulting from t(X;17)(p11.2;q25.3), is one of the most commonly identified fusion genes in Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC). However, its roles and underlying mechanism in RCC development are not yet clear. Here, we identified ASPL-TFE3 fusion as the most common tRCC subtype in a Chinese population (29/126, 23.03%). This fusion protein translocated into the nucleus and promoted RCC cell proliferation both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, the fusion protein transcriptionally activated the lysosome-autophagy pathway by binding to the promoters of lysosome-related genes. Autophagy, activated by ASPL-TFE3, enabled RCC cells to escape energy stress by promoting the utilization of proteins and lipids. Moreover, we found that the ASPL-TFE3 fusion escaped regulation by the classic mTOR-TFE3 signal and instead activated phospho-mTOR and its downstream targets. Finally, targeting both autophagy and the mTOR axis resulted in a greater antiproliferative effect than single pathway inhibition. In summary, these results confirmed the ASPL-TFE3 fusion as a master regulator of metabolic adaptation mediated by autophagy in tRCC. The simultaneous manipulation of autophagy and the mTOR axis may represent a novel treatment strategy for ASPL-TFE3 fusion RCC.

Factors Associated with Survival From Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma Diagnosis-A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Purpose: Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 tRCC) is a rare subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), characterized by translocations of Xp11.2 breakpoints, involving of the transcription factor three gene (TFE3). The aim of our study was to comprehensively characterize the clinical characteristics and outcomes, and to identify risk factors associated with OS and PFS in Xp11.2 tRCC patients.

Methods: Literature search on Xp11.2 tRCC was performed using databases such as pubmed EMBASE and Web of Science. Studies were eligible if outcomes data (OS and/or PFS) were reported for patients with a histopathologically confirmed Xp11.2 tRCC. PFS and OS were evaluated using the univariable and multivariable Cox regression model.

Results: There were 80 eligible publications, contributing 415 patients. In multivariable analyses, the T stage at presentation was significantly associated with PFS (HR: 3.87; 95% CI: 1.70 to 8.84; p = 0.001). The median time of PFS was 72 months. In the multivariable analyses, age at diagnosis (HR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.03 to 4.50; p = 0.041), T stage at presentation (HR: 4.44; 95% CI: 2.16 to 9.09; p < 0.001) and metastasis status at presentation (HR: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.12 to 6.41; p = 0.027) were all associated with OS, with a median follow-up time of 198 months.

Conclusion: T stage at presentation is the only factor that is associated with both PFS and OS in patients with Xp11.2 tRCC. Also, patients over 45 or with metastases are more likely to have poorer OS.

Low expression of TRAF3IP2-AS1 promotes progression of NONO-TFE3 translocation renal cell carcinoma by stimulating N6-methyladenosine of PARP1 mRNA and downregulating PTEN

Background

NONO-TFE3 translocation renal cell carcinoma (NONO-TFE3 tRCC) is one subtype of RCCs associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusions RCC (Xp11.2 tRCCs). Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) has attracted great attention in cancer research. The function and mechanisms of TRAF3IP2 antisense RNA 1 (TRAF3IP2-AS1), a natural antisense lncRNA, in NONO-TFE3 tRCC remain poorly understood.

Methods

FISH and qRT-PCR were undertaken to study the expression, localization and clinical significance of TRAF3IP2-AS1 in Xp11.2 tRCC tissues and cells. The functions of TRAF3IP2-AS1 in tRCC were investigated by proliferation analysis, EdU staining, colony and sphere formation assay, Transwell assay and apoptosis analysis. The regulatory mechanisms among TRAF3IP2-AS1, PARP1, PTEN and miR-200a-3p/153-3p/141-3p were investigated by luciferase assay, RNA immunoprecipitation, Western blot and immunohistochemistry.

Results

The expression of TRAF3IP2-AS1 was suppressed by NONO-TFE3 fusion in NONO-TFE3 tRCC tissues and cells. Overexpression of TRAF3IP2-AS1 inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion of UOK109 cells which were derived from cancer tissue of patient with NONO-TFE3 tRCC. Mechanistic studies revealed that TRAF3IP2-AS1 accelerated the decay of PARP1 mRNA by direct binding and recruitment of N⁶-methyladenosie methyltransferase complex. Meanwhile, TRAF3IP2-AS1 competitively bound to miR-200a-3p/153-3p/141-3p and prevented those from decreasing the level of PTEN.

Conclusions

TRAF3IP2-AS1 functions as a tumor suppressor in NONO-TFE3 tRCC progression and may serve as a novel target for NONO-TFE3 tRCC therapy. TRAF3IP2-AS1 expression has the potential to serve as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for NONO-TFE3 tRCC detection.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13045-021-01059-5.

Molecular Heterogeneity of Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Correlation Between Split Signal Pattern in FISH and Prognosis

Purpose

Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 tRCC) is a distinct subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) characterized by chromosomal translocations involving TFE3 gene. TFE3 break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay is an effective tool to diagnose Xp11.2 tRCC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation between split signal pattern in FISH and the clinicopathological characteristics of Xp11.2 tRCC.

Patients and Methods

We reviewed 2037 RCC patients who underwent partial nephrectomy or radical nephrectomy from January 2007 to March 2020 in our institution. Forty-nine cases were diagnosed as Xp11.2 tRCC and their split signal patterns were evaluated. X-tile software was used to determine the optimal cut-off value of the percentage of split signal in FISH. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed to assess the relationship between signal pattern of FISH and the prognosis.

Results

Among the 49 patients, 13 patients and 36 patients were classified into high and low split signal group, respectively. Nine cases showed extra amplification signal pattern and 40 cases showed typical translocation signal pattern. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that high percentage of split signal and amplification signal pattern were the independent predictors for progression-free survival (PFS) whereas only pT stage was associated independently with overall survival (OS).

Conclusion

Xp11.2 tRCC cases with high percentage of split signals or amplification signal pattern may have a worse outcome, and the two indicators need to be highlighted in clinical practice.

Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Characteristics of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Confirmed TFE3-Gene Fusion Associated Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single Institutional Cohort

TFE3-fusion associated renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-RCC) accounts for up to 5% adults and 40% of childhood RCC. Their comprehensive immunohistochemical (IHC) profile in correlation to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing and their role in the diagnostic approach are not well documented because of lacking published data. FISH confirmed TFE3-RCC between years 2010 and 2020 were identified from institutional electronic database and retrospectively reviewed. Eighty-five TFE3-RCC were identified. Seventy-six of 85 (89.4%) TFE3-RCC cases had positive TFE3 expression, with diffuse and strong/moderate TFE3 expression in 45 (54.2%). Three (3.5%) TFE3-RCC had negative TFE3 expression whereas 6 (7%) cases had equivocal TFE3 expression. On the other hand, positive TFE3-IHC expression was observed in 17/29 (58.6%) TFE3-FISH negative RCC cases, although only 8 (27.5%) had diffuse and moderate/strong TFE3 expression. Diffuse and strong TFE3-IHC expression was statistically significant in predicting TFE3-FISH positivity (P<0.0001) regardless of morphologic features. After univariate and multivariate analyses, TFE3-IHC was the only parameter with significant predictive value for detecting positive TFE3-FISH (P<0.0001). On univariate analysis, sex, classic morphology, age, negative AE1/AE3 or cytokeratin 7 were not predictive of TFE3-FISH positivity. Diffuse and strong nuclear TFE3-IHC expression is significantly associated with TFE3-FISH positivity and can be used as a surrogate marker to confirm translocation associated cases. TFE3-rearranged RCCs show variable histomorphologic features and TFE3-FISH should be performed in cases presenting at a younger age or, regardless of the age, tumors with unusual morphology. Despite previous reports, negative pancytokeratin and positive cathepsin K expression may not be reliable markers for TFE3-RCC.

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma syndrome-associated renal cell carcinoma: Morphological appraisal with a comprehensive review of differential diagnoses

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC) is an autosomal dominant syndrome wherein affected individuals are at risk for the development of cutaneous leiomyomas, early-onset multiple uterine leiomyomas, and an aggressive subtype of renal cell cancer. HLRCC is caused by germline mutations in the fumarate hydratase (FH) gene, which inactivates the enzyme and alters the function of the tricarboxylic acid/Krebs cycle. This article reviews the hitherto described morphologic features of HLRCC-associated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and outlines the differential diagnosis and ancillary use of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics for these tumors. The morphologic spectrum of HLRCC-associated RCC is wide and histologic features, including tumor cells with prominent nucleoli, perinucleolar halos, and multiple architectural patterns within the same tumor, which are suggestive of this diagnosis. FH immunohistochemistry in conjunction with genetic counseling and germline FH testing are the important parameters for detection of this entity. These kidney tumors warrant prompt treatment as even smaller sized lesions can demonstrate aggressive behavior and systemic oncologic treatment in metastatic disease should, if possible, be part of a clinical trial. Screening procedures in HLRCC families should preferably be evaluated in large cohorts.

Fusion genes as biomarkers in pediatric cancers: A review of the current state and applicability in diagnostics and personalized therapy

The incidence of pediatric cancers is rising steadily across the world, along with the challenges in understanding the molecular mechanisms and devising effective therapeutic strategies. Pediatric cancers are presented with diverse molecular characteristics and more distinct subtypes when compared to adult cancers. Recent studies on the genomic landscape of pediatric cancers using next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches have redefined this field by providing better subtype characterization and novel actionable targets. Since early identification and personalized treatment strategies influence therapeutic outcomes, survival, and quality of life in pediatric cancer patients, the quest for actionable biomarkers is of great value in this field. Fusion genes that are prevalent and recurrent in several pediatric cancers are ideally suited in this context due to their disease-specific occurrence. In this review, we explore the current status of fusion genes in pediatric cancer subtypes and their use as biomarkers for diagnosis and personalized therapy. We discuss the technological advancements made in recent years in NGS sequencing and their impact on fusion detection algorithms that have revolutionized this field. Finally, we also discuss the advantages of pairing liquid biopsy protocols for fusion detection and their eventual use in diagnosis and treatment monitoring.

Contributions of genetics to the evolution of the diagnostic classification of renal cell neoplasia: a personal perspective

The classification system for neoplasms of the cells lining the renal tubules (renal cell neoplasms) has expanded greatly over the last five decades. The criteria for recognising an entity and including it in the classification have changed from being purely morphological and clinical to include genetics; presently, some are defined purely on genetics. Expansion of the number of entities included in the classification has many of the newly included entities and those under consideration for inclusion being very rare. The clinical utility of including entities which are extremely rare, based mainly upon genetic information, is unclear.

Biphasic Hyalinizing Psammomatous Renal Cell Carcinoma (BHP RCC): A Distinctive Neoplasm Associated With Somatic NF2 Mutations

We report 8 cases of a distinctive, previously undescribed renal cell carcinoma associated with somatic mutations in the neurofibromin 2 (NF2) gene. All patients were adults, ranging from 51 to 78 years of age and of cases of known sex 6 of 7 were males. The carcinomas were predominantly unencapsulated, and all had a rounded, nodular interface with the native kidney. The neoplasms were all solid with papillary architecture evident in most cases (7/8), while 1 was only tubular. All cases were biphasic, characterized by larger and smaller carcinoma cells. The smaller cells clustered around basement membrane material similar to the characteristic pattern of the t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma associated with TFEB gene fusions. In 6 of 8 carcinomas, branching nodules of small cells clustered around basement membrane material within larger acini yielding a distinctive glomeruloid pattern. In 6 of 8 carcinomas, the small cells were focally spindle-shaped and unassociated with the basement membrane material. The stroma was sclerotic in all 8 carcinomas, and all 8 contained psammoma bodies that were abundant in 2. In some carcinomas, focal or predominant areas had a less distinctive appearance; 2 had areas that resembled clear cell renal cell carcinoma, 2 had high-grade eosinophilic areas, while 1 had branching tubular architecture that resembled mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma. Two carcinomas demonstrated cellular necrosis. Although we have minimal clinical follow-up, 1 case presented with distant metastasis, progressed and resulted in patient death. While NF2 mutations may be found in other established renal cell carcinoma subtypes (often as secondary genetic alterations), they are potentially the genetic driver of this distinctive entity.

Targetable gene fusions and aberrations in genitourinary oncology

Gene fusions result from either structural chromosomal rearrangement or aberrations caused by splicing or transcriptional readthrough. The precise and distinctive presence of fusion genes in neoplastic tissues and their involvement in multiple pathways central to cancer development, growth and survival make them promising targets for personalized therapy. In genitourinary malignancies, rearrangements involving the E26 transformation-specific family of transcription factors have emerged as very frequent alterations in prostate cancer, especially the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion. In renal malignancies, Xp11 and t(6;11) translocations are hallmarks of a distinct pathological group of tumours described as microphthalmia-associated transcription factor family translocation-associated renal cell carcinomas. Novel druggable fusion events have been recognized in genitourinary malignancies, leading to the activation of several clinical trials. For instance, ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinomas have shown responses to alectinib and crizotinib. Erdafitinib has been tested for the treatment of FGFR-rearranged bladder cancer. Other anti-fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) compounds are showing promising results in the treatment of bladder cancer, including infigratinib and pemigatinib, and all are currently in clinical trials.

Pediatric Renal Tumors: Updates in the Molecular Era

Molecular characterization has led to advances in the understanding of pediatric renal tumors, including the association of pediatric cystic nephromas with DICER1 tumor syndrome, the metanephric family of tumors with somatic BRAF mutations, the characterization of ETV6-NTRK3-negative congenital mesoblastic nephromas, the expanded spectrum of gene fusions in translocation renal cell carcinoma, the relationship of clear cell sarcoma of the kidney with other BCOR-altered tumors, and the pathways affected by SMARCB1 alterations in rhabdoid tumors of the kidney. These advances have implications for diagnosis, classification, and treatment of pediatric renal tumors.

Clinicopathologic and Molecular Analysis of the TFEB Fusion Variant Reveals New Members of TFEB Translocation Renal Cell Carcinomas (RCCs): Expanding the Genomic Spectrum

Xp11 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with different gene fusions may have different clinicopathologic features. We sought to identify variant fusions in TFEB translocation RCC. A total of 31 cases of TFEB RCCs were selected for the current study; MALAT1-TFEB fusion was identified in 25 cases (81%, 25/31) using fusion probes. The remaining 6 cases (19%, 6/31) were further analyzed by RNA sequencing and 5 of them were detected with TFEB-associated gene fusions, including 2 ACTB-TFEB, 1 EWSR1-TFEB, 1 CLTC-TFEB, and 1 potential PPP1R10-TFEB (a paracentric inversion of the TFEB gene, consistent with "negative" TFEB split FISH result, and advising a potential diagnostic pitfall in detecting TFEB gene rearrangement). Four of the 5 fusion transcripts were successfully validated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. Morphologically, approximately one third (29%, 9/31) of TFEB RCCs showed typical biphasic morphology. The remaining two thirds of the cases (71%, 22/31) exhibited nonspecific morphology, with nested, sheet-like, or papillary architecture, resembling other types of renal neoplasms, such as clear cell RCC, Xp11 RCC, perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa), or papillary RCC. Although cases bearing a MALAT1-TFEB fusion demonstrated variable morphologies, all 9 cases featuring typical biphasic morphology were associated with MALAT1-TFEB genotype. Accordingly, typical biphasic morphology suggests MALAT1-TFEB fusion, whereas atypical morphology did not suggest the specific type of fusion. Isolated or clustered eosinophilic cells were a common feature in TFEB RCCs, which may be a useful morphology diagnostic clue for TFEB RCCs. Clinicopathologic variables assessment showed that necrosis was the only morphologic feature that correlated with the aggressive behavior of TFEB RCC (P=0.004). In summary, our study expands the genomic spectrum and the clinicopathologic features of TFEB RCCs, and highlights the challenges of diagnosis and the importance of subtyping of this tumor by combining morphology and multiple molecular techniques.

Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Adult Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma at Clinical T1 Stage: A Multicenter Study in China

Purpose

To evaluate the oncologic efficacy and feasibility of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) in adult Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Patients and Methods

Seventy patients with Xp11.2 translocation RCC and 273 with conventional RCC from five institutions in Nanjing were retrospectively studied. All patients were older than 18 years and were categorized into clinical T1 (cT1) stage using preoperative imaging. Using the preoperative imaging and electronic medical records, anatomical and pathological features were collected and analyzed.

Results

Among patients with Xp11.2 translocation RCC, 18/36 (50.0%) with cT1a and 12/34 (35.3%) with cT1b tumors underwent NSS. The respective proportions in the conventional RCC group were 121/145 (83.4%) and 93/128 (72.7%). Among cT1a tumors, the Xp11.2 translocation RCCs tended to be adjacent to the collecting system, sinus, and axial renal midline compared with conventional RCCs. Patients with Xp11.2 translocation RCCs who underwent NSS had comparable progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival to radical nephrectomy (RN) patients (P > 0.05). Among cT1b tumors, surgical margin positivity and pelvicalyceal, vascular, and region lymphatic involvement were more likely to occur in the Xp11.2 translocation RCCs (P < 0.05). Patients with Xp11.2 translocation RCC who underwent RN had a more favorable PFS than those who underwent NSS (P = 0.048). However, multivariate analysis of PFS did not identify surgical method as a risk factor (P = 0.089).

Conclusions

Among adults with Xp11.2 translocation RCC, NSS can be an alternative for patients with cT1a tumor but should be performed with more deliberation in patients with cT1b tumors.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08813-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comprehensive analysis of 34 MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas and review of the literature: investigating prognostic markers and therapy targets

Recently cabozantinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against VEGF, MET, AXL, and downregulating cathepsin K in vitro, has been proposed for the treatment of advanced clear and non-clear renal cell carcinomas. Since it is well known that cathepsin K is expressed in the majority of MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas, we investigated cathepsin K, MET, AXL, and VEGF in a large series of those tumours, looking for possible predictive markers. We collected the clinicopathological features of 34 genetically confirmed MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas [26 Xp11 and 8 t(6;11) renal cell carcinomas] and studied them using an immunohistochemical panel including PAX8, cathepsin K, HMB45, Melan-A, CD68 (PG-M1), CK7, CA9, MET, AXL and by FISH for VEGFA and MET. Cathepsin K was expressed in 14 of 26, HMB45 in 8 of 25, and Melan-A in 4 of 23 Xp11 renal cell carcinomas, whereas labelling for CK7 and CA9 was minimal. In t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma, cathepsin K and melanogenesis markers were constantly positive, whereas CK7 and CA9 were negative. None of the 34 carcinomas showed CD68 (PG-M1) and AXL expression. One aggressive Xp11 renal cell carcinoma showed increased VEGFA gene copy number (4-5 copies) with concurrent gains of TFE3 and TFEB. None of the 34 carcinomas showed MET gene amplification, whereas staining for MET was found in 7 of 8 t(6;11) and in 16 of 24 Xp11 renal cell carcinomas, and in the latter cases, when the expression was >50%, correlated with aggressiveness (p=0.0049). In Xp11 renal cell carcinomas, the aggressiveness was also correlated with larger tumour size (p=0.0008) and the presence of necrosis (p=0.027) but not nucleolar grading (p=1). Interestingly, in patients with tumours exhibiting two of three parameters (necrosis, larger tumour size and MET immunolabelling >50%) an aggressive clinical behaviour was observed in 88% of cases. In conclusion, cathepsin K, CD68 (PG-M1), CK7, CA9, and PAX8 is a useful panel for the diagnosis. Larger tumour size, the presence of necrosis and MET immunohistochemical expression correlate with aggressive behaviour in Xp11 renal cell carcinomas, especially in combination. VEGF, MET, cathepsin K but not AXL may be potential predictive markers for targeted therapy in MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas.

Clinicopathological Findings on 28 Cases with XP11.2 Renal Cell Carcinoma

Xp11.2 translocation carcinoma is a distinct subtype of renal cell carcinoma characterized by translocations involving the TFE3 gene. Our study included the morphological, immunohistochemical and clinicopathological examination of 28 Xp11.2 RCCs. The immunophenotype has been assessed by using CA9, CK7, CD10, AMACR, MelanA, HMB45, Cathepsin K and TFE3 immunostainings. The diagnosis was confirmed by TFE3 break-apart FISH in 25 cases. The ages of 13 male and 15 female patients, without underlying renal disease or having undergone chemotherapy ranged from 8 to 72. The mean size of the tumors was 78.5 mm. Forty-three percent of patients were diagnosed in the pT3/pT4 stage with distant metastasis in 6 cases. Histological appearance was branching-papillary composed of clear cells with voluminous cytoplasm in 13 and variable in 15 cases, including one tumor with anaplastic carcinoma and another with rhabdoid morphology. Three tumors were labeled with CA9, while CK7 was negative in all cases. Diffuse CD10 reaction was observed in 17 tumors and diffuse AMACR positivity was described in 14 tumors. The expression of melanocytic markers and Cathepsin K were seen only in 7 and 6 cases, respectively. TFE3 immunohistochemistry displayed a positive reaction in 26/28 samples. TFE3 rearrangement was detected in all the analyzed cases (25/25), including one with the loss of the entire labeled break-point region. The follow-up time ranged from 2 to 300 months, with 7 cancer-related deaths. In summary, Xp11.2 carcinoma is an uncommon form of renal cell carcinoma with a variable histomorphology and rather aggressive clinical course.