Inhaled prostaglandin E1 for treatment of acute lung injury in severe multiple organ failure

A Narrative Review on the Administration of Inhaled Prostaglandins in Critically Ill Adult Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To describe the effect of inhaled prostaglandins on both oxygenation and mortality in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with a focus on safety and efficacy in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of MEDLINE was performed using the following search terms: inhaled prostaglandins, inhaled epoprostenol, inhaled nitric oxide, ARDS, critically ill. All abstracts were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant English-language reports and studies conducted in humans between 1980 and June 2023 were considered.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data regarding inhaled prostaglandins and their effect on oxygenation are limited but show a benefit in patients who respond to therapy, and data pertaining to their effect on mortality is scarce. Concerns exist regarding the formulation of inhaled epoprostenol (iEPO) utilized in addition to modes of medication delivery; however, the limited data surrounding their use have shown a reasonable safety profile. Other avenues and beneficial effects may exist with inhaled prostaglandins, such as use in COVID-19-associated ARDS or non-COVID-19 ARDS patients undergoing noninvasive mechanical ventilation or during patient transport.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

The use of inhaled prostaglandins can be considered in critically ill patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS or non-COVID-19 ARDS who are experiencing difficulties with oxygenation refractory to nonpharmacologic strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of iEPO and other inhaled prostaglandins requires further investigation to fully elucidate their effects on clinical outcomes, but it appears these medications may have a potential benefit in COVID-19-associated ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS patients with refractory hypoxemia but with little effect on mortality.

Review 2: Primary graft dysfunction after lung transplant-pathophysiology, clinical considerations and therapeutic targets

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is one of the most common complications in the early postoperative period and is the most common cause of death in the first postoperative month. The underlying pathophysiology is thought to be the ischaemia–reperfusion injury that occurs during the storage and reperfusion of the lung engraftment; this triggers a cascade of pathological changes, which result in pulmonary vascular dysfunction and loss of the normal alveolar architecture. There are a number of surgical and anaesthetic factors which may be related to the development of PGD. To date, although treatment options for PGD are limited, there are several promising experimental therapeutic targets. In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiology, clinical management and potential therapeutic targets of PGD.

Aerosolized prostacyclins for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)

BACKGROUND

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a critical condition that is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Aerosolized prostacyclin has been used to improve oxygenation despite the limited evidence available so far.This review was originally published in 2010 and updated in 2017.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of aerosolized prostacyclin in adults and children with ARDS.

SEARCH METHODS

In this update, we searched CENTRAL (2017, Issue 4); MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), ISI BIOSIS Previews, ISI Web of Science, LILACS, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and three trials registers. We handsearched the reference lists of the latest reviews, randomized and non-randomized trials, and editorials, and cross-checked them with our search of MEDLINE. We contacted the main authors of included studies to request any missed, unreported or ongoing studies. The search was run from inception to 5 May 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs), irrespective of publication status, date of publication, blinding status, outcomes published or language. We contacted trial investigators and study authors to retrieve relevant and missing data.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently abstracted data and resolved any disagreements by discussion. Our primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. We planned to perform subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the effect of aerosolized prostacyclin in adults and children, and on various clinical and physiological outcomes. We assessed the risk of bias through assessment of methodological trial components and the risk of random error through trial sequential analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two RCTs with 81 participants.One RCT involved 14 critically ill children with ARDS (very low quality of evidence), and one RCT involved 67 critically ill adults (very low quality evidence).Only one RCT (paediatric trial) provided data on mortality and found no difference between intervention and control. However, this trial was eligible for meta-analysis due to a cross-over design.We assessed the benefits and harms of aerosolized prostacyclin. One RCT found no difference in improvement of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO₂/FiO₂) ratio (mean difference (MD) -25.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) -60.48 to 9.78; P = 0.16; 67 participants, very low quality evidence).There were no adverse events such as bleeding or organ dysfunction in any of the included trials. Due to the limited number of RCTs, we were unable to perform the prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses or trial sequential analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We are unable to tell from our results whether the intervention has an important effect on mortality because the results were too imprecise to rule out a small or no effect. Therefore, no current evidence supports or refutes the routine use of aerosolized prostacyclin for people with ARDS. There is an urgent need for more RCTs.

Therapeutic effect of prostaglandin E1 in monocrotaline-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension rats

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe pulmonary vascular disease characterized by sustained increase in pulmonary arterial pressure and excessive thickening and remodeling of distal small pulmonary arteries. During disease progression, PAH include increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure, right ventricular (RV) enlargement, increased pulmonary vascular resistance, and smooth muscle hypertrophy in pulmonary arterioles. Several anti-PAH therapies targeting various pathways involved in PAH progression have been approved by the Food and Drug Adminstration. However, many of the currently available anti-PAH drugs suffer from a number of limitations, including short biological half-life, and poor pulmonary selectivity. Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) is a potent vasodilator with selectivity toward pulmonary circulation when it is administered via the pulmonary route. However, PGE1 has a very short half-life of 5–10 minutes. Therefore, we hypothesized that long-term effect of PGE1 could reduce mal-adaptive structural remodeling of the lung and heart and prevent ventricular arrhythmias in monocrotaline-induced rat model of PAH. Our results revealed that PGE1 reduced ventricular hypertrophy, protein expressions of endothelin-1 and endothelin receptor A, and the expression of fibrosis. These results support the notion that PGE1 can improve the functional properties of RV, highlighting its potential benefits for heart and lung impairment.

Inhaled pulmonary vasodilators for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: safety issues relating to drug administration and delivery devices

Treatment for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) aims to reduce pulmonary vascular resistance while maintaining systemic vascular resistance. Selective pulmonary vasodilation may be achieved by targeting pulmonary-specific pathways or by delivering vasodilators directly to the lungs. Abrupt withdrawal of a pulmonary vasodilator can cause rebound pulmonary hypertension. Therefore, use of consistent delivery systems that allow for careful monitoring of drug delivery is important. This manuscript reviews published studies of inhaled vasodilators used for treatment of PPHN and provides an overview of safety issues associated with drug delivery and delivery devices as they relate to the risk of rebound pulmonary hypertension. Off-label use of aerosolized prostacyclins and an aerosolized prostaglandin in neonates with PPHN has been reported; however, evidence from large randomized clinical trials is lacking. The amount of a given dose of aerosolized drug that is actually delivered to the lungs is often unknown, and the actual amount of drug deposited in the lungs can be affected by several factors, including patient size, nebulizer used, and placement of the nebulizer within the breathing circuit. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is the only pulmonary vasodilator approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of PPHN. The iNO delivery device, INOmax DS_IR®IR, is designed to constantly monitor NO, NO₂, and O₂ deliveries and is equipped with audible and visual alarms to alert providers of abrupt discontinuation and incorrect drug concentration. Other safety features of this device include two independent backup delivery systems, a backup drug cylinder, a battery that provides up to 6 hours of uninterrupted medication delivery, and 27 alarms that monitor delivery, dosage, and system functions. The ability of the drug delivery device to provide safe, consistent dosing is important to consider when selecting a pulmonary vasodilator.

The use of inhaled prostaglandins in patients with ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether inhaled prostaglandins are associated with improvement in pulmonary physiology or mortality in patients with ARDS and assess adverse effects.

METHODS

The following data sources were used: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, reference lists, conference proceedings, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies selected included randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies. For data extraction, two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts for eligibility. With regard to data synthesis, 25 studies (two RCTs) published over 21 years (1993-2014) were included. The PROSPERO registration number was CRD42014013180.

RESULTS

One randomized controlled trial showed no difference in the change in mean Pao2 to Fio2 ratio when comparing inhaled alprostadil to placebo: 141.2 (95% CI, 120.8-161.5) to 161.5 (95% CI, 134.6-188.3) vs 163.4 (95% CI, 140.8-186.0) to 186.8 (95% CI, 162.9-210.7), P = .21. Meta-analysis of the remaining studies demonstrated that inhaled prostaglandins were associated with improvement in Pao2 to Fio2 ratio (16 studies; 39.0% higher; 95% CI, 26.7%-51.3%), and Pao2 (eight studies; 21.4% higher; 95% CI, 12.2%-30.6%), and a decrease in pulmonary artery pressure (-4.8 mm Hg; 95% CI, -6.8 mm Hg to -2.8 mm Hg). Risk of bias and heterogeneity were high. Meta-regression found no association with publication year (P = .862), baseline oxygenation (P = .106), and ARDS etiology (P = .816) with the treatment effect. Hypotension occurred in 17.4% of patients in observational studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In ARDS, inhaled prostaglandins improve oxygenation and decrease pulmonary artery pressures and may be associated with harm. Data are limited both in terms of methodologic quality and demonstration of clinical benefit. The use of inhaled prostaglandins in ARDS needs further study.

Inhaled PGE1 in neonates with hypoxemic respiratory failure: two pilot feasibility randomized clinical trials

Background

Inhaled nitric oxide (INO), a selective pulmonary vasodilator, has revolutionized the treatment of neonatal hypoxemic respiratory failure (NHRF). However, there is lack of sustained improvement in 30 to 46% of infants. Aerosolized prostaglandins I₂ (PGI₂) and E₁ (PGE₁) have been reported to be effective selective pulmonary vasodilators. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of inhaled PGE₁ (IPGE₁) in NHRF.

Methods

Two pilot multicenter phase II RCTs are included in this report. In the first pilot, late preterm and term neonates with NHRF, who had an oxygenation index (OI) of ≥15 and <25 on two arterial blood gases and had not previously received INO, were randomly assigned to receive two doses of IPGE₁ (300 and 150 ng/kg/min) or placebo. The primary outcome was the enrollment of 50 infants in six to nine months at 10 sites. The first pilot was halted after four months for failure to enroll a single infant. The most common cause for non-enrollment was prior initiation of INO. In a re-designed second pilot, co-administration of IPGE₁ and INO was permitted. Infants with suboptimal response to INO received either aerosolized saline or IPGE₁ at a low (150 ng/kg/min) or high dose (300 ng/kg/min) for a maximum duration of 72 hours. The primary outcome was the recruitment of an adequate number of patients (n = 50) in a nine-month-period, with fewer than 20% protocol violations.

Results

No infants were enrolled in the first pilot. Seven patients were enrolled in the second pilot; three in the control, two in the low-dose IPGE₁, and two in the high-dose IPGE₁ groups. The study was halted for recruitment futility after approximately six months as enrollment targets were not met. No serious adverse events, one minor protocol deviation and one pharmacy protocol violation were reported.

Conclusions

These two pilot RCTs failed to recruit adequate eligible newborns with NHRF. Complex management RCTs of novel therapies for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) may require novel study designs and a longer period of time from study approval to commencement of enrollment.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov

Pilot one: NCT number: 00598429 registered on 10 January 2008. Last updated: 3 February 2011.

Pilot two: NCT number: 01467076 17 October 2011. Last updated: 13 February 2013.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-486) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Inhaled PLGA particles of prostaglandin E₁ ameliorate symptoms and progression of pulmonary hypertension at a reduced dosing frequency

This study sought to investigate the efficacy of a noninvasive and long acting polymeric particle based formulation of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1), a potent pulmonary vasodilator, in alleviating the signs of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and reversing the biochemical changes that occur in the diseased lungs. PH rats, developed by a single subcutaneous injection of monocrotaline (MCT), were treated with two types of polymeric particles of PGE1, porous and nonporous, and intratracheal or intravenous plain PGE1. For chronic studies, rats received either intratracheal porous poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) particles, once- or thrice-a-day, or plain PGE1 thrice-a-day for 10 days administered intratracheally or intravenously. The influence of formulations on disease progression was studied by measuring the mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP), evaluating right ventricular hypertrophy and assessing various molecular and cellular makers including the degree of muscularization, platelet aggregation, matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Both plain PGE1 and large porous particles of PGE1 reduced MPAP and right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) in rats that received the treatments for 10 days. Polymeric porous particles of PGE1 produced the same effects at a reduced dosing frequency compared to plain PGE1 and caused minimal off-target effects on systemic hemodynamics. Microscopic and immunohistochemical studies revealed that porous particles of PGE1 also reduced the degree of muscularization, von Willebrand factor (vWF), and PCNA expression in the lungs of PH rats. Overall, our study suggests that PGE1 loaded inhalable particulate formulations improve PH symptoms and arrest the progression of disease at a reduced dosing frequency compared to plain PGE1.

Pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension in acute lung injury

Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome are characterized by protein rich alveolar edema, reduced lung compliance, and acute severe hypoxemia. A degree of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is also characteristic, higher levels of which are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The increase in right ventricular (RV) afterload causes RV dysfunction and failure in some patients, with associated adverse effects on oxygen delivery. Although the introduction of lung protective ventilation strategies has probably reduced the severity of PH in ALI, a recent invasive hemodynamic analysis suggests that even in the modern era, its presence remains clinically important. We therefore sought to summarize current knowledge of the pathophysiology of PH in ALI.

Influence of PEI as a core modifying agent on PLGA microspheres of PGE₁, a pulmonary selective vasodilator

This study tests the hypothesis that large porous poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microparticles modified with polyethyleneimine (PEI) are viable carriers for pulmonary delivery of prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)) used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a pulmonary vascular disorder. The particles were prepared by a double-emulsion solvent evaporation method with PEI-25 kDa in the internal aqueous phase to produce an osmotic pressure gradient. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was used for external coating of the particles. The particles were examined for morphology, size, aerodynamic diameter, surface area, pore volume and in-vitro release profiles. Particles with optimal properties for inhalation were tested for in-vivo pulmonary absorption, metabolic stability in rat lung homogenates, and acute toxicity in rat bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and respiratory epithelial cells, Calu-3. The micromeritic data indicated that the PEI-modified particles of PGE(1) are optimal for inhalation. Incorporation of PEI in the formulations resulted in an increased entrapment efficiency - 83.26 ± 3.04% for particles with 1% PVA and 95.48 ± 0.46% for particles with 2% PVA. The amount of cumulative drug released into the simulated interstitial lung fluid was between 50.8 ± 0.76% and 55.36 ± 0.06%. A remarkable extension of the circulation half-life up to 6.0-6.5h was observed when the formulations were administered via the lungs. The metabolic stability and toxicity studies showed that the optimized formulations were stable at physiological conditions and relatively safe to the lungs and respiratory epithelium. Overall, this study demonstrates that large porous inhalable polymeric microparticles can be a feasible option for non-invasive and controlled release of PGE(1) for treatment of PAH.

Pulmonary vascular and right ventricular dysfunction in adult critical care: current and emerging options for management: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vascular dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension (PH), and resulting right ventricular (RV) failure occur in many critical illnesses and may be associated with a worse prognosis. PH and RV failure may be difficult to manage: principles include maintenance of appropriate RV preload, augmentation of RV function, and reduction of RV afterload by lowering pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). We therefore provide a detailed update on the management of PH and RV failure in adult critical care.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed, based on a search of the literature from 1980 to 2010, by using prespecified search terms. Relevant studies were subjected to analysis based on the GRADE method.

RESULTS

Clinical studies of intensive care management of pulmonary vascular dysfunction were identified, describing volume therapy, vasopressors, sympathetic inotropes, inodilators, levosimendan, pulmonary vasodilators, and mechanical devices. The following GRADE recommendations (evidence level) are made in patients with pulmonary vascular dysfunction: 1) A weak recommendation (very-low-quality evidence) is made that close monitoring of the RV is advised as volume loading may worsen RV performance; 2) A weak recommendation (low-quality evidence) is made that low-dose norepinephrine is an effective pressor in these patients; and that 3) low-dose vasopressin may be useful to manage patients with resistant vasodilatory shock. 4) A weak recommendation (low-moderate quality evidence) is made that low-dose dobutamine improves RV function in pulmonary vascular dysfunction. 5) A strong recommendation (moderate-quality evidence) is made that phosphodiesterase type III inhibitors reduce PVR and improve RV function, although hypotension is frequent. 6) A weak recommendation (low-quality evidence) is made that levosimendan may be useful for short-term improvements in RV performance. 7) A strong recommendation (moderate-quality evidence) is made that pulmonary vasodilators reduce PVR and improve RV function, notably in pulmonary vascular dysfunction after cardiac surgery, and that the side-effect profile is reduced by using inhaled rather than systemic agents. 8) A weak recommendation (very-low-quality evidence) is made that mechanical therapies may be useful rescue therapies in some settings of pulmonary vascular dysfunction awaiting definitive therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlights that although some recommendations can be made to guide the critical care management of pulmonary vascular and right ventricular dysfunction, within the limitations of this review and the GRADE methodology, the quality of the evidence base is generally low, and further high-quality research is needed.

Toxicity of prolonged high dose inhaled PGE1 in ventilated neonatal pigs

OBJECTIVE

To study the toxicity of inhaled PGE1 (IPGE1) in healthy ventilated piglets.

METHODS

Mechanically ventilated anesthetized piglets received either high dose IPGE1 (IPGE1 group) or nebulized saline (control group) continuously for 24h. Cardio-respiratory parameters, complete blood counts and serum electrolytes were monitored. Lung histology was evaluated by a masked pathologist for the severity (minimal, moderate, and severe) and extent (focal, multifocal, and diffuse) of histologic injury.

RESULTS

Ten neonatal pigs were instrumented. Four received nebulized saline and six received high dose IPGE1. There was no evidence of adverse cardio-respiratory effects, bronchial irritation or hypernatremia related to IPGE1. Diffuse/multifocal alveolar edema and focal polymorphonuclear infiltration was observed in both the control and IPGE1 groups suggesting that alveolar alterations may be secondary to effects of mechanical ventilation. The most distinct histomorphological abnormalities observed in the IPGE1 animals were focal ulceration, flattening of the bronchial epithelium and loss of cilia of moderate to severe degree in the trachea and bronchi.

CONCLUSION

In healthy piglets, inhalation of high dose IPGE1 was not associated with adverse cardiorespiratory effects, bronchial irritation, or hypernatremia and produced minimal signs of pulmonary toxicity even after 24h. Prolonged inhalation of high dose PGE1 therefore appears safe in newborn piglets.

Jet nebulization of prostaglandin E1 during neonatal mechanical ventilation: stability, emitted dose and aerosol particle size

BACKGROUND

We have previously reported the safety of aerosolized PGE1 in neonatal hypoxemic respiratory failure. The aim of this study is to characterize the physicochemical properties of PGE1 solution, stability, emitted dose and the aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) of PGE1 aerosol in a neonatal ventilator circuit.

METHODS

PGE1 was diluted in normal saline and physicochemical properties of the solution characterized. Chemical stability and emitted dose were evaluated during jet nebulization in a neonatal conventional (CMV) or high frequency (HFV) ventilator circuit by a high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method. The APSD of the PGE1 aerosol was evaluated with a 6-stage cascade impactor during CMV.

RESULTS

PGE1 solution in normal saline had a low viscosity (0.9818 cP) and surface tension (60.8 mN/m) making it suitable for aerosolization. Little or no degradation of PGE1 was observed in samples from aerosol condensates, the PGE1 solution infused over 24h, or the residual solution in the nebulizer. The emitted dose of PGE1 following jet nebulization was 32-40% during CMV and 0.1% during HFV. The PGE1 aerosol had a mass median aerodynamic diameter of 1.4 microm and geometric S.D. of 2.9 with 90% of particles being <4.0 microm in size.

CONCLUSION

Nebulization of PGE1 during neonatal CMV or HFV is efficient and results in rapid nebulization without altering the chemical structure. On the basis of the physicochemical properties of PGE1 solution and the APSD of the PGE1 aerosol, one can predict predominantly alveolar deposition of aerosolized PGE1.

Systemic levels following PGE1 inhalation in neonatal hypoxemic respiratory failure

AIM

To measure plasma prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) levels in newborns with hypoxemic respiratory failure (NHRF) following inhaled PGE1 (IPGE1), normal term newborns, and newborns with congenital heart disease (CHD) following intravenous PGE1.

METHODS

Twenty newborns with NHRF received IPGE1 by jet nebulizer in doses of 25, 50, 150, and 300 ng/kg/min followed by weaning. Blood for PGE1 assay using enzyme immunoassay was available in eight neonates with NHRF, 10 normal newborns, and three neonates with CHD.

RESULTS

There were no differences in PGE1 levels between cord arterial blood in normal newborns and baseline samples from newborns with NHRF. Oxygenation improved significantly following IPGE1 (p=0.024) in newborns with NHRF. No adverse events were identified. Although a reversible increase in PGE1 levels was detected following a dose of 50 ng/kg/min (p<0.05), there was no association between PGE1 levels and IPGE1 duration, PaO2, temperature, heart rate, and blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

A reversible increase in mean PGE1 levels was demonstrable at low doses of IPGE1 in babies with NHRF using a sensitive assay, suggesting effective drug delivery. Levels did not increase further with increasing dose or duration of administration, suggesting local action in the lungs and a lack of systemic spillover due to extensive pulmonary metabolism offering pulmonary selectivity.

Retrospective evaluation of inhaled prostaglandins in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine whether use of inhaled alprostadil (PGE 1 ) or epoprostenol (PGI 2 ) significantly improved oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and to determine whether differences between the two drugs exist with regard to oxygenation, duration of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization, adverse effects, and survival.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

A 360-bed tertiary care teaching facility with medical and surgical intensive care units.

PATIENTS

Twenty-seven patients admitted to the hospital who received either PGI 2 or PGE 1 for a primary or secondary diagnosis of ARDS.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Seventeen patients received inhaled PGE 1 and 10 received inhaled PGI 2 . There were no significant changes in the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO 2 ):fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ) and in the PaO 2 , from baseline to any time point that was analyzed during treatment, for patients receiving either PGE 1 (p=0.2120 and 0.3399, respectively) or PGI 2 (p=0.1655 and 0.0784, respectively).

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant improvement in oxygenation was observed in patients receiving either PGE 1 or PGI 2 . In addition, no significant differences were found between the two prostaglandins for the variables studied. Until positive results from large, prospective studies are available, we recommend that these inhaled prostaglandins not be used to treat ARDS.

Aerosolized PGE1: a selective pulmonary vasodilator in neonatal hypoxemic respiratory failure results of a Phase I/II open label clinical trial

Twenty term/near term neonates with hypoxemic respiratory failure and oxygenation index >/=20 were enrolled in a Phase I/II feasibility, safety and dose escalation study of inhaled PGE(1) (IPGE(1)). Incremental doses of IPGE(1), delivered by a jet nebulizer over a 2-h period, followed by weaning over 1 h, were given to 13 patients before receiving inhaled nitric oxide (INO) (Group I), and to seven patients, who failed to respond to INO (Group II). Response was defined as an increase in P(a)O(2) of either >/= 25 (full) or 10-25 (partial) torr. Exit criteria included an acute deterioration in oxygenation status, a persistent oxygenation index above 35 in Group I, or the availability of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in Group II. The mean (SD) increase in P(a)O(2) at the end of IPGE(1) administration was 63 (62.3) in Group I (p = 0.024), and 40 (62.1) in Group II (p > 0.05). In Group I, 8 of 13 neonates had a full response, but 4 deteriorated following discontinuation of IPGE(1). Of these four, two responded to INO and two were placed on ECMO. Five patients deteriorated before or during IPGE(1,) and none of them responded to INO. In Group II, three of seven patients had a full response to IPGE(1). One patient with a partial response and all patients exiting before or during IPGE(1) administration were placed on ECMO. The results of our study indicate that IPGE(1) may be a safe, selective pulmonary vasodilator in neonatal hypoxemic respiratory failure.

The pulmonary physician in critical care - part 9: non-ventilatory strategies in ARDS

Pharmacological approaches to the treatment of ARDS are reviewed. Future treatments should be targeted at elements of the pathological process that produce specific clinical problems.

Inhaled vasodilator therapy for treatment of acute lung injury

In randomized controlled trials, inhaled nitric oxide failed to provide significant clinical benefit in patients with acute lung injury. Despite temporary improvement in oxygenation, inhaled nitric oxide neither improved survival, nor decreased length of mechanical ventilation. Thus, with the exception of severe hypoxaemia refractory to conventional therapy, inhaled nitric oxide is not indicated in patients with acute lung injury. Inhalation of prostacyclin and prostaglandin E1, respectively, has been associated with an improvement in oxygenation and a decrease in pulmonary artery pressure. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to assess the impact of inhaled prostaglandins on the outcome of patients with acute lung injury.

Recognition and management of pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary arterial pressure > 20mm Hg at rest or > 30mm Hg during exercise) occurs (i) as primary pulmonary hypertension (no known underlying cause), (ii) as persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn or (iii) secondary to a variety of lung and cardiovascular diseases. In the last 10 to 15 years there have been significant advances in the medical management of this debilitating and life-threatening disorder. The main drugs in current use are anticoagulants (warfarin, heparin) and vasodilators, especially oral calcium antagonists, intravenous prostacyclin (prostaglandin I2; epoprostenol) and inhaled nitric oxide. Calcium antagonists, (e.g. nifedipine, diltiazem) are used chiefly in primary pulmonary hypertension. They are effective in patients who give a pulmonary vasodilator response to an acute challenge with a short acting vasodilator (e.g. prostacyclin, nitric oxide or adenosine), and are used in doses greater than are usual in the treatment of other cardiovascular disorders. Prostacyclin, given by continuous intravenous infusion, is effective in patients even if they do not respond to an acute vasodilator challenge. The long term benefit in these patients is thought to reflect the antiproliferative effects of the drug and/or its ability to inhibit platelet aggregation. It is used either as long term therapy or as a bridge to transplantation. Inhaled nitric oxide, which is used mainly in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn, has the particular benefit of being pulmonary selective, due to its route of administration and rapid inactivation. Anticoagulants have a specific role in the treatment of pulmonary thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and are also used routinely in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Nondrug treatments for pulmonary hypertension include (i) supplemental oxygen (> or = 15 h/day), which is the primary therapy in patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and (ii) heart-lung or lung transplantation, which nowadays is regarded as a last resort. Different types of pulmonary hypertension require different treatment strategies. Future advances in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension may come from the use of drug combinations, the development of new drugs, such as endothelin antagonists, nitric oxide donors and potassium channel openers, or the application of gene therapy.