Analgesic and cognitive effects of intravenous ketamine-alfentanil combinations versus either drug alone after intradermal capsaicin in normal subjects

A data science approach to the selection of most informative readouts of the human intradermal capsaicin pain model to assess pregabalin effects

Persistent and, in particular, neuropathic pain is a major healthcare problem with still insufficient pharmacological treatment options. This triggered research activities aimed at finding analgesics with a novel mechanism of action. Results of these efforts will need to pass through the phases of drug development, in which experimental human pain models are established components e.g. implemented as chemical hyperalgesia induced by capsaicin. We aimed at ranking the various readouts of a human capsaicin-based pain model with respect to the most relevant information about the effects of a potential reference analgesic. In a placebo-controlled, randomized cross-over study, seven different pain-related readouts were acquired in 16 healthy individuals before and after oral administration of 300 mg pregabalin. The sizes of the effect on pain induced by intradermal injection of capsaicin were quantified by calculating Cohen's d. While in four of the seven pain-related parameters, pregabalin provided a small effect judged by values of Cohen's d exceeding 0.2, an item categorization technique implemented as computed ABC analysis identified the pain intensities in the area of secondary hyperalgesia and of allodynia as the most suitable parameters to quantify the analgesic effects of pregabalin. Results of this study provide further support for the ability of the intradermal capsaicin pain model to show analgesic effects of pregabalin. Results can serve as a basis for the designs of studies where the inclusion of this particular pain model and pregabalin is planned.

Additive and subadditive antiallodynic interactions between μ-opioid agonists and N-methyl D-aspartate antagonists in male rhesus monkeys

μ-Opioid agonists are clinically effective analgesics, but also produce undesirable effects such as sedation and abuse potential that limit their clinical utility. Glutamatergic systems also modulate nociception and N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists have been proposed as one useful adjunct to enhance the therapeutic effects and/or attenuate the undesirable effects of μ-opioid agonists. Whether NMDA antagonists enhance the antiallodynic effects of μ-agonists in preclinical models of thermal hypersensitivity (i.e. capsaicin-induced thermal allodynia) are unknown. The present study determined the behavioral effects of racemic ketamine, (+)-MK-801, (-)-nalbuphine, and (-)-oxycodone alone and in fixed proportion mixtures in assays of capsaicin-induced thermal allodynia and schedule-controlled responding in rhesus monkeys. Ketamine, nalbuphine, and oxycodone produced dose-dependent antiallodynia. MK-801 was inactive up to doses that produced undesirable effects. Ketamine, but not MK-801, enhanced the potency of μ-agonists to decrease rates of operant responding. Ketamine and nalbuphine interactions were additive in both procedures. Ketamine and oxycodone interactions were additive or subadditive depending on the mixture. Furthermore, oxycodone and MK-801 interactions were subadditive on antiallodynia and additive on rate suppression. These results do not support the broad clinical utility of NMDA receptor antagonists as adjuncts to μ-opioid agonists for thermal allodynic pain states.

Effect of Intravenous Ethanol on Capsaicin-Induced Hyperalgesia in Human Subjects

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess ethanol's (EtOH's) effects on capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia in healthy participants. Specifically, we investigated the change in area of capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia following 3 interventions: intravenous EtOH at 2 targeted breath alcohol concentrations (BrAC), or placebo.

METHODS

Eighteen participants participated in 3 test days in a randomized order. Each test day, participants received an intradermal capsaicin injection on the volar surface of the forearm, followed by either infusion of high concentration EtOH (targeted BrAC = 0.100 g/dl), low concentration EtOH (targeted BrAC = 0.040 g/dl), or placebo. The area of hyperalgesia was determined by von Frey technique at 2 time points, prior to EtOH infusion, and again when target BrAC was reached. The primary outcome was the percent change in the area of capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia. Additional outcome measures included the visual analogue scale of mood states (VAS), which was administered at each time point.

RESULTS

There was a marked 30% reduction in the area of capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia with infusion of a high concentration of EtOH (p < 0.05). Low concentration EtOH produced a 10% reduction in hyperalgesia area, although this finding did not reach significance. Further, participants reported significant feelings of euphoria and drowsiness at high concentrations of EtOH (p < 0.05), as measured by the VAS.

CONCLUSIONS

In a human model examining pain phenomena related to central sensitization, this study is the first to demonstrate that capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia is markedly attenuated by EtOH. The capsaicin experimental pain paradigm employed provides a novel approach to evaluate EtOH's effects on pain processing. The antihyperalgesic effects of EtOH observed have important clinical implications for the converging fields of substance abuse and pain medicine and may inform why patients with chronic pain often report alcohol use as a form of self-medication.

Human experimental pain models for assessing the therapeutic efficacy of analgesic drugs

Pain models in animals have shown low predictivity for analgesic efficacy in humans, and clinical studies are often very confounded, blurring the evaluation. Human experimental pain models may therefore help to evaluate mechanisms and effect of analgesics and bridge findings from basic studies to the clinic. The present review outlines the concept and limitations of human experimental pain models and addresses analgesic efficacy in healthy volunteers and patients. Experimental models to evoke pain and hyperalgesia are available for most tissues. In healthy volunteers, the effect of acetaminophen is difficult to detect unless neurophysiological methods are used, whereas the effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs could be detected in most models. Anticonvulsants and antidepressants are sensitive in several models, particularly in models inducing hyperalgesia. For opioids, tonic pain with high intensity is attenuated more than short-lasting pain and nonpainful sensations. Fewer studies were performed in patients. In general, the sensitivity to analgesics is better in patients than in healthy volunteers, but the lower number of studies may bias the results. Experimental models have variable reliability, and validity shall be interpreted with caution. Models including deep, tonic pain and hyperalgesia are better to predict the effects of analgesics. Assessment with neurophysiologic methods and imaging is valuable as a supplement to psychophysical methods and can increase sensitivity. The models need to be designed with careful consideration of pharmacological mechanisms and pharmacokinetics of analgesics. Knowledge obtained from this review can help design experimental pain studies for new compounds entering phase I and II clinical trials.

Effect of transdermal opioids in experimentally induced superficial, deep and hyperalgesic pain

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Chronic pain and hyperalgesia can be difficult to treat with classical opioids acting predominately at the µ-opioid receptor. Buprenorphine and its active metabolite are believed to act through µ-, κ- and δ-receptors and may therefore possess different analgesic and anti-hyperalgesic effects compared with pure µ-receptor agonists, for example, fentanyl. Here, we have compared the analgesic and anti-hyperalgesic effects of buprenorphine and fentanyl.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Twenty-two healthy volunteers were randomized to treatment with transdermal buprenorphine (20 µg·h(-1), 144 h), fentanyl (25 µg·h(-1), 72 h) or placebo patches in a double-blind, cross-over experimental pain study. The experimental pain tests (phasic pain, sensitization) involved pressure at the tibial bone, cutaneous electrical and thermal stimulation, intramuscular nerve growth factor, UVB light burn injury model and intradermal capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia. Pain testing was carried out at baseline, 24, 48, 72 and 144 h after application of the drugs.

KEY RESULTS

Compared with placebo, buprenorphine, but not fentanyl, significantly attenuated pressure at the tibial bone as well as pressure pain in the primary hyperalgesic area induced by UVB light The two drugs were equipotent and better than placebo against cutaneous thermal pain stimulation), but failed to show significant analgesic effect to cutaneous electrical stimulation, nerve growth factor-induced muscle soreness and to capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Buprenorphine, but not fentanyl, showed analgesic effects against experimentally induced, bone-associated pain and primary hyperalgesia compared with placebo. These tissue- and modality-differentiated properties may reflect the variable effects of opioid drugs observed in individual patients.

Long-term potentiation in spinal nociceptive pathways as a novel target for pain therapy

Long-term potentiation (LTP) in nociceptive spinal pathways shares several features with hyperalgesia and has been proposed to be a cellular mechanism of pain amplification in acute and chronic pain states. Spinal LTP is typically induced by noxious input and has therefore been hypothesized to contribute to acute postoperative pain and to forms of chronic pain that develop from an initial painful event, peripheral inflammation or neuropathy. Under this assumption, preventing LTP induction may help to prevent the development of exaggerated postoperative pain and reversing established LTP may help to treat patients who have an LTP component to their chronic pain. Spinal LTP is also induced by abrupt opioid withdrawal, making it a possible mechanism of some forms of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Here, we give an overview of targets for preventing LTP induction and modifying established LTP as identified in animal studies. We discuss which of the various symptoms of human experimental and clinical pain may be manifestations of spinal LTP, review the pharmacology of these possible human LTP manifestations and compare it to the pharmacology of spinal LTP in rodents.

Assessing efficacy of non-opioid analgesics in experimental pain models in healthy volunteers: an updated review

AIM

Experimental pain models may help to evaluate the mechanisms of analgesics and target the clinical indications for their use. This review, the second in a series of two, addresses how the efficacy of non-opioid analgesics have been assessed in human volunteers using experimental pain models.

METHODS

A literature search was completed for randomized controlled studies that included human experimental pain models, healthy volunteers and non-opioid analgesics.

RESULTS

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs worked against various types of acute pain as well as in hyperalgesia. Analgesia from paracetamol was difficult to detect in experimental pain and the pain needed to be assessed with very sensitive methods like evoked brain potentials. The N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists exemplified by ketamine generally needed strong, long-lasting or repeated pain in the skin for detectable analgesia, whereas pain in muscle and viscera generally was more easily attenuated. Gabapentin worked well in several models, particularly those inducing hyperalgesia, whereas lamotrigine was weak in modulation of experimental pain. Imipramine attenuated pain in most experimental models, whereas amitriptyline had weaker effects. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol attenuated pain in only a few models.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain induction and assessment are very important for the sensitivity of the pain models. Generally, experimental pain models need to be designed with careful consideration of the pharmacological mechanisms and pharmacokinetics of analgesics. The drawback with the different study designs is also discussed. This knowledge can aid the decisions that need to be taken when designing experimental pain studies for compounds entering Phase I and II trials.

Lumbar sympathetic blockade in children with complex regional pain syndromes: a double blind placebo-controlled crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Sympathetic blockade is used in the management of complex regional pain syndromes in children, but there are no data on the efficacy or mechanism(s) by which it produces pain relief. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of lidocaine administered by lumbar sympathetic to IV route.

METHODS

Under general anesthesia, children with unilateral lower limb complex regional pain syndromes received catheters along the lumbar sympathetic chain. In a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover design, patients received IV lidocaine and lumbar sympathetic saline or lumbar sympathetic lidocaine and IV saline. Spontaneous and evoked pain ratings and sensory thresholds were assessed before and after these two lidocaine/saline doses and between routes of lumbar sympathetic blockade and IV.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients, ages 10-18 yr, were enrolled. There was evidence for reduction of mean pain intensity of allodynia to brush (mean -1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.5 to -0.3) and to pinprick temporal summation (mean -1.3, 95% CI -2.5 to -0.2) with lidocaine treatment via the lumbar sympathetic blockade compared to IV route. Lumbar sympathetic blockade also produced significant reduction in pain intensity compared to pretreatment values of allodynia to brush, pinprick and pinprick temporal summation and verbal pain scores. IV lidocaine did not produce significant changes in spontaneous and evoked pain intensity measurements compared to pretreatment values. There were no carryover effects as assessed by route-by-period interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the conditions of this study, the results provide some direct evidence that a component of pain may be mediated by abnormal sympathetic efferent activity.

Assessing analgesic actions of opioids by experimental pain models in healthy volunteers - an updated review

AIM

Experimental pain models may help to evaluate the mechanisms of action of analgesics and target the clinical indications for their use. This review addresses how the efficacy of opioids can be assessed in human volunteers using experimental pain models. The drawback with the different study designs is also discussed.

METHOD

A literature search was completed for randomized controlled studies which included human experimental pain models, healthy volunteers and opioids.

RESULTS

Opioids with a strong affinity for the micro-opioid receptor decreased the sensation in a variety of experimental pain modalities, but strong tonic pain was attenuated more than short lasting pain and non-painful sensations. The effects of opioids with weaker affinity for the micro-opioid receptor were detected by a more narrow range of pain models, and the assessment methods needed to be more sensitive.

CONCLUSION

The way the pain is induced, assessed and summarized is very important for the sensitivity of the pain models. This review gives an overview of how different opioids perform in experimental pain models. Generally experimental pain models need to be designed with careful consideration of pharmacological mechanisms and pharmacokinetics of analgesics. This knowledge can aid the decisions needed to be taken when designing experimental pain studies for compounds entering phase 1 clinical trials.

Opioid tolerance development: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective

The opioids are commonly used to treat acute and severe pain. Long-term opioid administration eventually reaches a dose ceiling that is attributable to the rapid onset of analgesic tolerance coupled with the slow development of tolerance to the untoward side effects of respiratory depression, nausea and decreased gastrointestinal motility. The need for effective-long term analgesia remains. In order to develop new therapeutics and novel strategies for use of current analgesics, the processes that mediate tolerance must be understood. This review highlights potential pharmacokinetic (changes in metabolite production, metabolizing enzyme expression, and transporter function) and pharmacodynamic (receptor type, location and functionality; alterations in signaling pathways and cross-tolerance) aspects of opioid tolerance development, and presents several pharmacodynamic modeling strategies that have been used to characterize time-dependent attenuation of opioid analgesia.

STUDIES WITH KETAMINE AND ALFENTANIL FOLLOWING FREUND'S COMPLETE ADJUVANT-INDUCED INFLAMMATION IN RATS

1. N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists suppress inflammatory hyperalgesia and the development of acute opioid tolerance. They may also enhance opioid-induced antinociception, while suppressing postopioid-induced hyperalgesia and opioid-enhanced inflammatory hyperalgesia. 2. The non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, ketamine, is a racemic chiral drug; its individual enantiomers have differing affinities for the NMDA receptor. The anaesthetic and antinociceptive potencies of (S)-ketamine are 1.5- and threefold higher, respectively, than those of (R)-ketamine in laboratory rodents. 3. The present study investigated the effects of racemic ketamine and enantiopure (S)-ketamine on inflammatory hyperalgesia in rats, 5 days after intraplantar injection of Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA) into one hind paw. First, racemic or (S)-ketamine was administered alone; second, racemic or (S)-ketamine was administered 30 min after initiation of i.v. infusions of the micro-opioid agonist, alfentanil. 4. Area under the curve (AUC) values for Von Frey paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) versus time curves were significantly increased (P < 0.05) for both inflamed and non-inflamed hind paws by racemic and (S)-ketamine (5 & 10 mg/kg, s.c.). Similarly, AUC values for reduction of hind paw volume versus time were significantly increased (P < 0.05) by racemic and (S)-ketamine (10 mg/kg, s.c.). 5. Alfentanil infusions significantly increased PWT in both hind paws, but neither racemic nor (S)-ketamine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) administered 30 min after initiation of alfentanil infusion produced further increases in PWT. 6. Racemic and (S)-ketamine produced antinociceptive effects in both hind paws, but an antihyperalgesic effect per se was not apparent. Additionally, there was a possible anti-inflammatory effect of both drugs in the inflamed hind paw. These findings complement previous studies in which non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonists suppressed behavioural hyperalgesia. 7. However, racemic and (S)-ketamine did not further enhance alfentanil's antinociceptive effects, although they appeared to prolong alfentanil's antinociceptive effects in the non-inflamed hind paw. These findings suggest that factors such as time-course, frequency and the mode of administration of NMDA receptor antagonists, in addition to the type of antinociceptive model (i.e. inflammatory compared with acute) and the nociceptive testing procedure (i.e. noxious mechanical compared with low threshold stimuli) may influence their effects on opioid-induced antinociception.

Investigation of the potentiation of the analgesic effects of fentanyl by ketamine in humans: a double-blinded, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover study of experimental pain[ISRCTN83088383]

BACKGROUND: Despite preclinical evidence suggesting a synergistic interaction between ketamine and opioids promoting analgesia, several clinical trials have not identified dosing regimens capable of eliciting a benefit in the co-administration of ketamine with opioids. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers participated in a double blinded, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover laboratory study in order to determine whether a low dose of ketamine potentiated the antinociceptive effect of fentanyl without causing an increase in sedative effects. A battery of tests was used to assess both nociception and sedation including electrical current, pressure, thermal stimuli, psychometric tests, and both subjective and objective scores of sedation. Target controlled infusions of the study drugs were used. Ketamine and fentanyl were administered alone and in combination in a double-blinded randomised crossover design. Saline was used as the control, and propofol was used to validate the tests of sedation. Cardiovascular and respiratory parameters were also assessed. RESULTS: The electrical current pain threshold dose response curve of fentanyl combined with ketamine was markedly steeper than the dose response curve of fentanyl alone. While a ketamine serum concentration of 30 ng/ml did not result in a change in electrical pain threshold when administered alone, when it was added to fentanyl, the combination resulted in greater increase in pain threshold than that of fentanyl administered alone. When nociception was assessed using heat and pressure stimuli, ketamine did not potentiate the anti-nociceptive effect of fentanyl. There was no difference between the sedative effect of fentanyl and fentanyl in combination with ketamine as assessed by both subjective and objective measures of sedation. Cardiovascular and respiratory parameters were unaffected by the study drugs at the doses given. CONCLUSION: A serum concentration of ketamine that did not alter indices of sedation potentiated the antinociceptive effect of fentanyl. This potentiation of antinociception occurred without an increase in sedation suggesting that low steady doses of ketamine (30-120 ng/ml) might be combined with mu opioid agonists to improve their analgesic effect in a clinical setting. (296 words).

Successful use of ketamine for intractable cancer pain

GOALS AND WORK: Despite medical awareness, intractable pain is a serious problem in cancer and occurs in up to 2% of advanced cancer patients. However, few data are available concerning the optimal treatment of such patients. The emergence of intractable pain may notably be due to the activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors located in the central nervous system. NMDA antagonists might thus be an interesting approach in such pain syndromes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve patients with intractable cancer pain received a test dose of 5-10 mg of ketamine, a strong NMDA antagonist, in order to determine their response and tolerance to the drug. Continuous intravenous infusions of ketamine associated with morphine were then administered.

MAIN RESULTS

The acute test dose was successful in all cases (VAS <3/10 after 5 min). The prolonged use of ketamine allowed us to reduce the total daily dose of morphine required (range: 200-1,200 mg) by 50% and allowed eight patients to go home with a portable pump with morphine and ketamine during a relatively long period of time (range: 7-350 days, median: 58 days). Side effects were moderate (dizziness) and they were limited to the test phase.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest the importance of NMDA receptors in the genesis of chronic cancer pain and indicate that NMDA antagonists should be further studied for the management of cancer pain and, in particular, intractable pain.

Postdelivery of alfentanil and ketamine has no effect on intradermal capsaicin-induced pain and hyperalgesia

OBJECTIVE

The predelivery of intravenous alfentanil (a mu opioid agonist) and ketamine (an -methyl d-aspartate antagonist) has recently been shown to decrease the secondary hyperalgesia induced by intradermal capsaicin. The focus of this study was to determine the effects of the postdelivery of intravenous alfentanil and ketamine on intradermal capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia.

DESIGN

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study. Five minutes after an intradermal capsaicin injection, alfentanil and ketamine infusions were administered for a target plasma concentration of 75 ng/ml for alfentanil and 150 ng/ml for ketamine or placebo equivalent using a computer-controlled infusion pump and maintained for the remainder of the study. The investigator recorded the magnitude of the pain score at the time of injection and at 5-minute intervals. Fifteen minutes after the intradermal capsaicin injection, the region of secondary hyperalgesia and flare response was determined.

RESULTS

Alfentanil and ketamine plasma levels targeted after injection of intradermal capsaicin had no significant effect on pain scores, flare response, or secondary hyperalgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with animal studies on preemptive analgesia, this study demonstrates that alfentanil and ketamine have a differential effect when delivered before and after a painful stimulus. Because of the differential effect seen, future studies on the pharmacology of human experimental pain should evaluate both predrug and postdrug delivery.

Evidence relating human verbal memory to hippocampal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors

Studies in rodents and nonhuman primates have linked the activity of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors within the hippocampus to animals' performance on memory-related tasks. However, whether these receptors are similarly essential for human memory is still an open question. Here we present evidence suggesting that hippocampal NMDA receptors, most likely within the CA1 region, do participate in human verbal memory processes. Words elicit a negative event-related potential (ERP) peaking around 400 ms within the anterior mesial temporal lobe (AMTL-N400). Ketamine, an NMDA-receptor antagonist, reduces the amplitude of the AMTL-N400 (in contrast to other hippocampal potentials) on initial presentation, eliminates the typical AMTL-N400 amplitude reduction with repetition, and leads to significant memory impairment. Of the various hippocampal subfields, only the density of CA1 neurons correlates with the word-related ERPs that are reduced by ketamine. Altogether, our behavioral, anatomical, and electrophysiological results indicate that hippocampal NMDA receptors are involved in human memory.

The human capsaicin model of allodynia and hyperalgesia: sources of variability and methods for reduction

Intradermal and topical application of capsaicin have been used to study mechanisms of mechanical allodynia (MA) and pinprick hyperalgesia (PPH) and the efficacy of drugs in relieving these symptoms. However, it is associated with significant inter- and intra-subject variability. In order to improve the model's sensitivity, we examined several potential sources of variability of capsaicin-evoked MA and PPH in healthy volunteers, including skin temperature fluctuations, method (intradermal vs. topical) and site (volar forearm vs. foot dorsum) of administration. In study I, 12 subjects received, in a 6-session, randomized, crossover trial, 1) 250 micrograms of intradermal (ID) CAP to the volar forearm with skin temperature fixed at 36 degrees C (36 ID). 2) 250 micrograms ID CAP with varying skin temperature (VT ID), or 3) 250 microliters of l% CAP patch placed on the skin at 36 degrees C. The resulting MA and PPH areas observed with each method were measured. In study II, a 4-session, randomized crossover trial, 12 subjects were given 100 micrograms ID CAP in the volar forearm or foot dorsum and subsequent areas of MA and PPH recorded. In study I, 5/12 subjects had small MA areas (< or = 5 cm2) and one subject had small PPH areas in at least 4/6 sessions. The most consistent intra-subject responses were seen with the 36 ID method. Correlation coefficients for the two sessions using the same method of administration were: MA; 36 ID r = 0.83, VT ID = 0.19. Topical r = 0.81; PPH: 36 ID r = 0.93; VT ID r = 0.38, Topical r = 0.78. In study II, 4/12 subjects had little MA for both forearm and foot though all subjects developed PPH. However, greater intra-subject consistency (MA: foot: r = 0.84; arm: r = 0.49; PPH: r = 0.87; r = 0.39) and significantly larger areas of MA (15.8 +/- 4.2 vs 9.1 +/- 2.5, p < 0.05) were seen with the foot. (PPH: foot: 28.9 +/- 6.7; arm: 21.6 +/- 4.2, NS). Large variability exists among subjects receiving CAP, with some developing minimal MA. However, these subjects may be screened out prior to entry, increasing the sensitivity of the model, which may be further improved by clamping the skin temperature.