Location and characteristics of nitric oxide synthase in sheep spinal cord and its interaction with alpha(2)-adrenergic and cholinergic antinociception

Use and Efficacy of Analgesic Agents in Sheep (Ovis aries) Used in Biomedical Research

Sheep (Ovis aries) are widely used as large animal models in biomedical research. However, current literature on the use of analgesics in sheep generally focuses on an industry or farm level of use. This structured review evaluates use and efficacy of analgesics administered to sheep in a biomedical research setting. Electronic databases were searched with terms related to analgesia in research sheep. After application of exclusion criteria, 29 peer-reviewed publications were evaluated from 1995 to 2018. Drugs used for analgesia in sheep include opioids, α₂ agonists, NSAID, local anesthetics, NMDA receptor antagonists, and calcium channel blockers. Opioid agonists have previously been considered short acting and of questionable efficacy in sheep, but newer modalities may provide effective analgesia. NSAID may exhibit an analgesic effect only when inflammatory pain is present and may not be beneficial for use in acute pain models. α₂ agonists provide effective yet short-lived analgesia; however, side effects are of concern. Local anesthetics were previously widely used as stand-alone agents, as alternatives to the use of general anesthetics in sheep. These agents have since fallen out of favor as sole agents. Despite this, they provide a valuable analgesic effect when used as adjuncts to general anesthetic regimes. The NMDA antagonist ketamine provided good analgesia and is likely underutilized as an analgesic agent in sheep. Future controlled studies should further evaluate the analgesic properties of ketamine in sheep.

Transdermal nitroglycerine enhances postoperative analgesia of intrathecal neostigmine following abdominal hysterectomies

This study was carried out to assess the effect of nitroglycerine (transdermal) on intrathecal neostigmine with bupivacaine on postoperative analgesia and note the incidence of adverse effects, if any. After taking informed consent, 120 patients of ASA Grade I and II were systematically randomised into four groups of 30 each. Patients were premedicated with midazolam 0.05 mg/kg intravenously and hydration with Ringer's lactate solution 10ml/kg preoperatively in the holding room. Group I patients received Intrathecal injection of 15 mg bupivacaine with 1ml of normal saline and transdermal placebo patch. Group II patients received Intrathecal injection of 15 mg bupivacaine with 5 mcg of neostigmine and transdermal placebo patch. Group III patients received Intrathecal injection of 15 mg bupivacaine with 1ml of normal saline with transdermal nitroglycerine patch (5 mg/24 hours). Group IV patients received Intrathecal injection of 15 mg bupivacaine with 5mcg of neostigmine and transdermal nitroglycerine patch (5 mg/24 hours), applied on a non anaesthetised area after 20 minutes. Groups were demographically similar and did not differ in intraoperative characteristics like sensory block, motor block, haemodynamic parameters and SpO(2). The mean duration of analgesia was 202.17 minutes, 407.20 minutes, 207.53 minutes and 581.63 minutes in control group (I), neostigmine group (II), nitroglycerine group (III) and nitroglycerine neostigmine group (IV) respectively (P<0.01). To conclude, our results show that transdermal nitroglycerine itself does not show any analgesic potential but it enhances the analgesic potential of intrathecal neostigmine.

alpha(2)-Adrenoceptor agonist xylazine induces peripheral antinociceptive effect by activation of the L-arginine/nitric oxide/cyclic GMP pathway in rat

The L-arginine/nitric oxide/cyclic GMP pathway has been proposed as the mechanism of action for peripheral antinociception concerning several groups of drugs, including opioids and nonsteroidal analgesics. The aim of the present study was to investigate the involvement of the L-arginine/NO/cGMP pathway on antinociception induced by xylazine, an alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist extensively used in veterinary medicine and animal experimentation. The rat paw pressure test was used by inducing hyperalgesia via intraplantar injection of prostaglandin E(2) (2 microg). Xylazine was administered locally into the right hind paw (25, 50 and 100 microg) and either NO synthase inhibitor L-NOarg (12, 18 and 24 microg/paw), soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibitor ODQ (25, 50 and 100 microg/paw) or cGMP-phosphodiesterase inhibitor zaprinast (50 microg/paw) were previously administered to the right hind paw of Wistar rats. Xylazine administration elicited a local antinociceptive effect, since only much higher doses produce a systemic effect in the contralateral paw. The peripheral antinociceptive effect induced by xylazine (100 microg/paw) was antagonized by L-NOarg and by ODQ; however, zaprinast potentiated the antinociceptive effect of xylazine at 25 microg/paw. The results provide evidence that xylazine probably induces peripheral antinociceptive effect by L-arginine/NO/cGMP pathway activation.

Role of the NO-cGMP pathway in the systemic antinociceptive effect of clonidine in rats and mice

The mechanism underlying the analgesic effect of clonidine, an alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, remains uncertain. Activation of alpha(2)-adrenoceptor induces the release of nitric oxide (NO) from endothelial cells, which has led us to test the hypothesis that the observed antinociceptive effect induced by the systemic administration of clonidine depends on the NO-cGMP pathway. The possible involvement of an opioid link in the antinociceptive effect of clonidine was also evaluated. The antinociceptive effect induced by systemic administration (intravenous or intraperitoneal) of clonidine was evaluated using the rat paw formalin, mice tail-flick and writhing tests. Clonidine (3-120 microg/kg) induces a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in the formalin, tail-flick and writhing tests. The antinociceptive effect of clonidine in a dose that had no sedative effect assessed by rota rod test, was significantly reduced by NO-synthase and guanylyl cyclase inhibition. The antinociceptive effect of morphine, but not clonidine, was inhibited by naloxone. Our current results suggest that the antinociceptive effect of systemic clonidine does not involve the opioid receptor and is modulated by the NO-cGMP pathway.

CEREBROVENTRICULAR INJECTION OF CLONIDINE CAUSES ANALGESIA MEDIATED BY A NITROGEN PATHWAY

Whereas neuroaxially administered clonidine produces analgesia partially mediated by alpha2-adrenoceptor-induced augmented synthesis of nitric oxide (NO), the central mechanisms by which clonidine produces its antinociceptive effects are still speculative. We used the tail-flick model of acute pain in mice to further explore the role of NO in mediating clonidine-induced central analgesia. Cerebroventricular administration of the following agents was studied: clonidine, L-arginine (NO precursor), the NO production inhibitor nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester (L-NAME), the NO antagonist methylene blue (MB), and nitroglycerine (NO-releasing agent). Analgesic response was achieved with clonidine and L-arginine. Simultaneous administration of L-arginine and clonidine produced no additive analgesic effect. Prior administration of L-NAME or MB partially abolished the clonidine-induced analgesic effect, whereas nitroglycerine administration did not affect it. NO may be involved in the mediation of the central antinociceptive effects of clonidine. Further investigation is necessary to determine the possible role of NO-promoting agents in analgesia when co-administered with clonidine.

INVOLVEMENT OF NITRIC OXIDE IN CLONIDINE-INDUCED SPINAL ANALGESIA

BACKGROUND

The chronic pain relieving effects following spinal administration of clonidine are probably connected to alpha2-adrenoreceptor-induced augmented synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) in the spinal cord. In contrast, when acute pain is considered, the possible role of NO is still speculative. The aim of the present study was to explore the role of NO in acute pain relief following intraspinal administration of clonidine.

METHODS

We used the mouse tail-flick model of acute pain. Spinal injections of the following agents and their combinations were administered: clonidine, L-arginine (NO precursor), the NO production inhibitor nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester (L-NAME), the NO antagonist methylene blue (MB) and nitroglycerine (NO releasing agent).

RESULTS

A 95% analgesic response was achieved with 2.0 microg clonidine. L-Arginine produced analgesia, and L-arginine administration followed by clonidine resulted in a pronounced synergistic analgesic effect. This synergistic effect was attenuated by L-NAME. Pre-treatment with MB decreased and nitroglycerine administration did not affect the clonidine-induced analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

NO may be involved in the mediation of the acute pain relieving effects of intraspinally administered clonidine. Further research is warranted to establish the potential benefits and possibility for incorporation of NO promoting agents in therapeutic regional pain regimens.

Carbachol interactions with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

The inhibition of cyclooxygenase enzymes by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) does not completely explain the antinociceptive efficacy of these agents. It is known that cholinergic agonists are antinociceptive, and this study evaluates the interactions between carbachol and some NSAIDs. Antinociceptive activity was evaluated in mice by the acetic acid writhing test. Dose-response curves were constructed for NSAIDs and carbachol, administered either intraperitoneally (i.p.) or intrathecally (i.t.). The interactions of carbachol with NSAIDs were evaluated by isobolographic analysis after the simultaneous administration of fixed proportions of carbachol with each NSAID. All of the drugs were more potent after spinal than after systemic administration. The combinations of NSAIDs and carbachol administered i.p. were supra-additive; however, the i.t. combinations were only additive. Isobolographic analysis of the coadministration of NSAIDs and carbachol and the fact that atropine antagonized the synergistic effect suggest that carbachol may strongly modulate the antinociceptive activity of NSAIDs; thus, central cholinergic modulation would be an additional mechanism for the antinociceptive action of NSAIDs, unrelated to prostaglandin biosynthesis inhibition.

Spinal norepinephrine release from nitric oxide species is not increased following peripheral nerve injury in rats

Alpha(2)-Adrenergic agonists increase the synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) in the spinal cord in both in vitro slice perfusion and in vivo microdialysis. In the normal condition, inhibition of NO synthase (NOS) has little effect on antinociception from alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists. However, following peripheral nerve injury, NOS inhibitors completely block the antihypersensitivity effects of alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists. It is possible that this increased reliance on NO may reflect a positive feedback release of norepinephrine (NE) stimulated by NO conjugates. For example, both S-nitroso-l-cysteine (SNC) and 6-NO(2)-norepinephrine (6-NO(2)-NE) release NE in rat spinal synaptosomes in a concentration-dependent manner and both are formed in spinal cord in vivo. In the current study, we tested whether SNC and 6-NO(2)-NE induced spinal NE release is increased in animals with peripheral nerve injury compared to normals. Crude spinal cord synaptosomes were prepared from nerve ligated and normal rats, loaded with [(3)H]NE and incubated with SNC or 6-NO(2)-NE. In a separate experiment, spinal cords from both groups were sonicated and the amount of NE measured using HPLC. NE release stimulated by SNC or 6-NO(2)-NE in lumbar dorsal spinal cord tissue did not differ between normal and nerve ligated groups. This suggests that increased spinal NE release from locally produced SNC or 6-NO(2)-NE is not the mechanism underlying the reliance of alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists on NO following peripheral nerve injury. Increased NE content and trend towards greater NE uptake in nerve injured spinal cord are consistent with increased noradrenergic innervation density of the spinal cord following peripheral nerve injury.

Neostigmine interactions with non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

1. The common mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is the inhibition of the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase (COX), however, this inhibition is not enough to completely account for the efficacy of these agents in several models of acute pain. 2. It has been demonstrated that cholinergic agents can induce antinociception, but the nature of the interaction between these agents and NSAIDs drugs has not been studied. The present work evaluates, by isobolographic analysis, the interactions between the cholinergic indirect agonist neostigmine (NEO) and NSAIDs drugs, using a chemical algesiometric test. 3. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) or intrathecal (i.t.) administration of NEO and of the different NSAIDs produced dose-dependent antinociception in the acetic acid writhing test of the mouse. 4. The i.p. or i.t. co-administration of fixed ratios of ED(50) fractions of NSAIDs and NEO, resulted to be synergistic or supra-additive for the combinations ketoprofen (KETO) and NEO, paracetamol (PARA) and NEO) and diclofenac (DICLO) and NEO administered i.p. However, the same combinations administered i.t. were only additive. In addition, the combinations meloxicam (MELO) and NEO and piroxicam (PIRO) and NEO, administered either i.p. or i.t., were additive. 5. The results suggest that the co-administration of NEO with some NSAIDs (e.g. KETO, PARA or DICLO) resulted in a synergistic interaction, which may provide evidence of supraspinal antinociception modulation by the increased acetylcholine concentration in the synaptic cleft of cholinergic interneurons. The interaction obtained between neostigmine and the NSAIDs could carry important clinical implications.

Descending control of pain

Upon receipt in the dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord, nociceptive (pain-signalling) information from the viscera, skin and other organs is subject to extensive processing by a diversity of mechanisms, certain of which enhance, and certain of which inhibit, its transfer to higher centres. In this regard, a network of descending pathways projecting from cerebral structures to the DH plays a complex and crucial role. Specific centrifugal pathways either suppress (descending inhibition) or potentiate (descending facilitation) passage of nociceptive messages to the brain. Engagement of descending inhibition by the opioid analgesic, morphine, fulfils an important role in its pain-relieving properties, while induction of analgesia by the adrenergic agonist, clonidine, reflects actions at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (alpha(2)-ARs) in the DH normally recruited by descending pathways. However, opioids and adrenergic agents exploit but a tiny fraction of the vast panoply of mechanisms now known to be involved in the induction and/or expression of descending controls. For example, no drug interfering with descending facilitation is currently available for clinical use. The present review focuses on: (1) the organisation of descending pathways and their pathophysiological significance; (2) the role of individual transmitters and specific receptor types in the modulation and expression of mechanisms of descending inhibition and facilitation and (3) the advantages and limitations of established and innovative analgesic strategies which act by manipulation of descending controls. Knowledge of descending pathways has increased exponentially in recent years, so this is an opportune moment to survey their operation and therapeutic relevance to the improved management of pain.

Formation of 6-nitro-norepinephrine from nitric oxide and norepinephrine in the spinal cord and its role in spinal analgesia

Spinally released norepinephrine is thought to produce analgesia in part by stimulating alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors, which in turn leads to nitric oxide synthesis. Also, nitric oxide is known to react with norepinephrine in vivo in the brain to form 6-nitro-norepinephrine, which inhibits neuronal norepinephrine reuptake. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that formation of 6-nitro-norepinephrine occurs in the spinal cord and that intrathecal administration of 6-nitro-norepinephrine produces analgesia by stimulating norepinephrine release. 6-Nitro-norepinephrine was present in rat spinal cord tissue and microdialysates of the dorsal horn and intrathecal space. Intrathecal norepinephrine injection increased 6-nitro-norepinephrine. 6-Nitro-norepinephrine also stimulated norepinephrine release in dorsal spinal cord in vitro. Intrathecal injection of 6-nitro-norepinephrine produced antinociception and interacted additively with norepinephrine for antinociception. Spinal noradrenergic nerve destruction increased antinociception from intrathecally injected norepinephrine, but decreased antinociception from 6-nitro-norepinephrine. These results suggest a functional interaction between spinal nitric oxide and norepinephrine in analgesia, mediated in part by formation of 6-nitro-norepinephrine. Stimulation of auto-inhibitory alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors at noradrenergic synapses decreases norepinephrine release. Paradoxically, alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist injection increases and alpha(2)-adrenergic antagonist injection decreases norepinephrine release in the spinal cord. 6-Nitro-norepinephrine may be an important regulator of spinal norepinephrine release and could explain the positive feedback on norepinephrine release after activation of spinal alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors.

The pharmacological basis of contemporary pain management

Pain management has become an increasingly well researched area in medicine over recent years, and there have been advances in a number of areas. While opioids remain an integral part of pain-management strategies, there is now an emphasis on the use of adjuvant drugs, such as paracetamol and anti-inflammatory agents, which through physiological or pharmacological synergism, both enhance pain control and reduce opioid use. The management of neuropathic pain continues to be a challenge. Anti-epileptics and antidepressants, together with clonidine and ketamine, provide the foundations for treatment. Another area of interest has been the widespread use of patient-controlled analgesia and the administration of some drugs, especially opioids, by means other than traditional oral and parenteral routes. The number of new drugs that have reached the stage of clinical trials has been small, yet they offer exciting possibilities. The epibatidine analogue ABT-594 and zinconitide both offer novel approaches to the management of neuropathic pain states, while selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and nitroaspirins may see advances in the management of nociceptive pain states.

Neuronal-type NO synthase: transcript diversity and expressional regulation

Of the three established isoforms of NO synthase, the gene for the neuronal-type enzyme (NOS I) is by far the largest and most complicated one. The genomic locus of the human NOS I gene is located on chromosome 12 and distributed over a region greater than 200 kb. The nucleotide sequence corresponding to the major neuronal mRNA transcript is encoded by 29 exons. The full-length open reading frame codes for a protein of 1434 amino acids with a predicted molecular weight of 160.8 kDa. However, both in rodents and in humans, multiple, tissue-specific or developmentally regulated NOS I mRNA transcripts have been reported. They arise from the initiation by different transcriptional units containing alternative promoters (at least eight in the human gene), cassette exon deletions or insertions, and/or the usage of alternate polyadenylation signals. Depending on the insertions and deletions, translation results in functional or nonfunctional proteins. The use of alternative promoters can influence gene expression by various means. Indeed, NOS I is not a static, constitutively expressed enzyme, but subject to expressional regulation by various compounds and conditions. The molecular mechanisms underlying these regulations are currently being studied in several laboratories including our own.

Muscarinic-mediated analgesia

Systemic administration of cholinesterase inhibitors which cross the blood brain barrier have long been known to produce analgesia and enhance analgesia from opiates. A major site of analgesic action of cholinergic agents is the spinal cord. Muscarinic receptors are concentrated in the superficial layers of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, an area of noxious sensory processing, and these reflect innervation primarily from cholinergic neurons with cell bodies deep in the neck of the dorsal horn. Spinal injection of cholinergic agonists results in analgesia which primarily reflects muscarinic receptor activation. Analgesia occurs in animal models of acute noxious stimulation and of chronic hypersensitivity pain. Although no cholinergic agonists have been tested for safety in humans, the cholinesterase inhibitor, neostigmine, has undergone such testing, and produces analgesia to experimental, acute postoperative, and chronic pain. Thus, muscarinic cholinergic agonists and cholinesterase inhibitors hold promise as non-opiate agents for the treatment of moderate to severe acute and chronic pain.

Phase I human safety assessment of intrathecal neostigmine containing methyl- and propylparabens

Intrathecal (i.t.) neostigmine produces analgesia in humans with acute experimental, postoperative, and chronic pain. The sole manufacturer of the preservative-free neostigmine solution used in the initial clinical studies no longer markets this preparation. Although solutions containing preservatives are generally avoided for i.t. injection, methyl- and propylparabens have not been demonstrated to be toxic. After preclinical toxicity screening in animals and Food and Drug Administration approval, 12 volunteers received i.t. neostigmine 10, 30, or 100 micrograms, containing these preservatives and glucose. This preparation produced dose-dependent analgesia, nausea, weakness, and sedation similar to the preservative-free preparation. I.t. neostigmine increased acetylcholine but not norepinephrine concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid. Although nitric oxide synthesis has been implicated in analgesia from i.t. neostigmine injection in animals, cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of nitrite as a measure of nitric oxide were not increased by i.t. neostigmine in these volunteers. These data support the investigational application of i.t. neostigmine containing methyl- and propylparabens in the concentrations studied.

IMPLICATIONS

Because intrathecal injection of neostigmine may be a useful analgesic, we performed a Phase I tolerability and safety study of the commercially available neostigmine formulation in human volunteers and found no evidence of toxicity. These data are important to the clinical use of this new therapy.

Intravenous morphine increases release of nitric oxide from spinal cord by an alpha-adrenergic and cholinergic mechanism

Systemic opioids produce analgesia in part by activating bulbospinal noradrenergic pathways. Spinally released norepinephrine (NE) has been suggested to produce analgesia in part by stimulating alpha2-adrenoceptors on cholinergic spinal interneurons to release acetylcholine (ACh). We hypothesized that this spinally released ACh would stimulate synthesis of nitric oxide (NO), and that spinally released NO after intravenous (IV) opioid injection thus would depend on a cascade of noradrenergic and cholinergic receptor stimulation. To test these hypotheses, IV morphine was administered to anesthetized sheep, and neurotransmitters in dorsal horn interstitial fluid were measured by microdialysis. IV morphine increased NE and ACh in dorsal horn microdialysates, and these increases were inhibited by IV naloxone or cervical spinal cord transection. IV morphine also increased dorsal horn microdialysate concentrations of nitrite, a stable metabolite of NO. Increases in NE, ACh, and nitrite were antagonized by prior intrathecal injection of the alpha2-adrenergic antagonist idazoxan, the muscarinic antagonist atropine, or the NO synthase inhibitor N-methyl--arginine (NMLA). To examine the concentration-dependent effects of spinal adrenergic stimulation, isolated rat spinal cord tissue was perfused with the alpha2-adrenergic agonist clonidine. Clonidine increased nitrite in the spinal cord tissue perfusate, an effect blocked by coadministration of idazoxan, atropine, and NMLA. These data support a previously hypothesized cascade of spinally released NE and ACh after systemic opioid administration. These data also suggest that spinally released NO plays a role in the analgesic effects of systemic opioids. In addition, these data imply a positive feedback whereby spinally released nitric oxide increases NE release and that has not previously been described.

Immunocytochemical localization of muscarinic m2 receptor in the rat spinal cord

Muscarinic receptors have been implied in the regulation of spinal cord functions. The m2 subtype has been found to be one of the major muscarinic receptors expressed in the spinal cord. In order to determine the precise cellular localization of m2 receptor in the rat spinal cord, immunocytochemistry was performed using a commercially available specific antibody. In the dorsal horn, strong m2 immunoreactivity was detected in the substantia gelatinosa. In the ventral horn, m2 immunoreactivity was detected in patches that were associated with cell groups of motor neurons. At higher magnification, m2 immunoreactivity was detected in neuronal processes and many of them were seen in close apposition to m2-negative perikarya and proximal dendrites of motor neurons. These results indicate that m2 receptor immunoreactivity is localized in different neuronal elements of the spinal cord.