Reduction by fentanyl of the Cp50 values of propofol and hemodynamic responses to various noxious stimuli

The EC90 of remifentanil for inhibiting endotracheal intubation responses under anesthesia induction with ciprofol: study protocol for a dose-finding trial with the biased-coin design

BACKGROUND

Tracheal intubation may cause significant hemodynamic responses. Many drugs have been shown to be effective in modifying these cardiovascular responses, including remifentanil, fentanyl, sufentanil, and alfentanil. However, the 90% effect-site concentration (EC90) of remifentanil required to control cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation when combined with ciprofol remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the EC90 of remifentanil inhibiting cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation during anesthesia induction with ciprofol using biased-coin design up-and-down sequential method (BC-UDM).

METHODS

This is a prospective sequential allocation dose-finding study. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I-II elective surgical patients receiving target-controlled infusion (TCI) of remifentanil effect-site concentration (Ce), followed by ciprofol and rocuronium for anesthesia, were enrolled. The cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation was defined as positive when mean arterial pressure (MAP) or heart rate (HR) is 15% higher than the baseline value. Using the BC-UDM, the Ce of remifentanil was determined based on the cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation of the previous patient. The EC90 and 90% confidence intervals (90% CIs) were estimated by R-Foundation centered isotonic regression and the pooled adjacent violators algorithm with bootstrapping.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study sought to demonstrate EC90 of remifentanil blunting sympathetic responses to tracheal intubation during anesthesia index (Ai)-guided ciprofol anesthesia using BCD-UDM. It may help to minimize the cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300078275. Registered on December 3, 2023.

The Impact of Fentanyl on the Effective Dose of Remimazolam-Induced Sedation in Elderly Female Patients: An Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the influence of fentanyl on the effective dose of remimazolam-induced sedation in elderly female patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Patients and Methods

Sixty female patients aged 65-80 years undergoing selective general anesthesia were randomized into two groups: Group R+F received an initial dose of remimazolam (7.5 mg) with fentanyl (1 μg/kg), while Group R received remimazolam alone. Dosing adjustments (±2.5 mg) were made based on the response of the preceding patient using the up-and-down allocation technique. The ED50 and ED95 were calculated using a sequential formula and probit regression. Probit regression was also used to assess the relative potency of remimazolam between groups. Sedation levels were evaluated using the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale.

Results

The ED50 for remimazolam was significantly lower in Group R+F compared to Group R (p= 0.007). Probit regression estimated the ED50 and ED95 values for Group R+F at 4.878 mg (95% CI, 3.845-5.859) and 8.184 mg (95% CI, 6.636-13.546), respectively. In contrast, Group R demonstrated ED50 and ED95 values of 6.733 mg (95% CI, 5.533-8.068) and 11.298 mg (95% CI, 9.101-19.617), respectively.

Conclusion

This study provides compelling evidence that the administration of 1 μg/kg of fentanyl significantly reduces the required sedative dose of remimazolam by approximately 30% during induction in elderly patients. Importantly, the concomitant use of 1 μg/kg of fentanyl does not increase the risk of adverse effects such as hypotension, respiratory depression.

Effect of remifentanil on three effect-site concentrations of propofol and their relationship during electroencephalography at loss of response, at maximum alpha power, and at onset of burst suppression: a prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

The effect-site concentration (Ce) at loss of response (Ce-LOR) to propofol closely correlates both with Ce as electroencephalographic alpha power becomes highest (Ce-alpha) and with Ce at onset of burst suppression (BS) (Ce-OBS), when no opioids are administered. Co-administration of opioids dose-dependently decreases Ce-LOR. We investigated the influence of remifentanil on the relationship between these three Ces.

METHODS

After receiving approval from our local ethical committee, with written informed consent, we enrolled 90 participants (ASA-PS I or II) who were scheduled for elective surgery. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: constant remifentanil Ce 0 ng/ml (Remi_0); 1 ng/mL (Remi_1); and 2 ng/mL (Remi_2). We recorded both raw EEG and EEG-derived parameters on a computer. After reaching remifentanil equilibrium, we administered propofol using a target-controlled infusion pump such that propofol Ce increased to about 0.3 μg/mL/min. After determining Ce-LOR, we administered 0.6 mg/kg of rocuronium and started mask ventilation. The study protocol ended after observation of BS.

RESULTS

Three participants were excluded. Ce-LOR in each group (Remi_0, Remi_1, Remi_2) was 2.00 ± 0.58 μg/mL, 1.43 ± 0.49 μg/mL, and 1.37 ± 0.42 μg/mL. Ce-alpha was 2.91 ± 0.63 μg/mL, 2.30 ± 0.41 μg/mL, and 2.12 ± 0.39 μg/mL. Ce-OBS was 3.80 ± 0.69 μg/mL, 3.25 ± 0.68 μg/mL, and 2.90 ± 0.57 μg/mL. In three other instances, Ce was decreased by remifentanil. Generalized linear model analysis revealed that remifentanil had no influence on the relationship between the three Ces.

CONCLUSION

During propofol anesthesia, even low concentrations of remifentanil shifted concentration-related electroencephalographic changes.

Antinociceptive Agents as General Anesthetic Adjuncts: Supra-additive and Infra-additive Interactions

The hypothesis "General anesthesia consists of producing both loss of consciousness and the inhibition of noxious stimuli reaching the brain and causing arousal" was used as a basis for the review of published data on general anesthetic interactions with antinociceptive agents: opioids, α 2 adrenergic agonists, and systemic sodium channel blockers. This review is focused on a specific type of anesthetic interaction-the transformation of antinociceptive agents into general anesthetic adjuncts. The primary aim is to answer 2 questions. First, how does an antinociceptive agent transform the effect of an anesthetic in providing a certain component of anesthesia-hypnosis, immobility, or hemodynamic response to noxious stimulation? Second, does a combination of an anesthetic with an adjunct result in a simple summation of their respective effects or in a supra-additive or infra-additive interaction? The Medline database was searched for data describing the interactions of antinociceptive agents and general anesthetics. The following classes of antinociceptive agents were considered: opioids, α 2 adrenergic agonists, and systemic sodium channel blockers. Drugs used in combination with antinociceptive agents were general anesthetics and benzodiazepines. The following terms related to drug interactions were used: anesthetic interactions, synergy, antagonism, isobolographic analysis, response surface analysis, and fractional analysis. The interactions of antinociceptive agents with general anesthetics result in a decrease of general anesthetic requirements, which differ for each of the components of general anesthesia: hypnosis, immobility, and hemodynamic response to noxious stimulation. Most studies of the nature of anesthetic interactions are related to opioid-general anesthetic combinations, and their conclusions usually confirm supra-additivity.

Personalized Medicine for Classical Anesthesia Drugs and Cancer Progression

In this review, we aim to discuss the use and effect of five different drugs used in the induction of anesthesia in cancer patients. Propofol, fentanyl, rocuronium, sugammadex, and dexamethasone are commonly used to induce anesthesia and prevent pain during surgery. Currently, the mechanisms of these drugs to induce the state of anesthesia are not yet fully understood, despite their use being considered safe. An association between anesthetic agents and cancer progression has been determined; therefore, it is essential to recognize the effects of all agents during cancer treatment and to evaluate whether the treatment provided to the patients could be more precise. We also highlight the use of in silico tools to review drug interaction effects and safety, as well as the efficacy of the treatment used according to different subgroups of patients.

Correlation between pain rating index and end-tidal sevoflurane concentration during sevoflurane anesthesia

Objective

To investigate the correlation between the pain rating index (PRi), which is an index derived from processed electroencephalography signals, and the end-tidal sevoflurane concentration (ETsevo).

Methods

This study involved 50 adults with a body mass index of 18 to 25 kg/m² who were undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Thyrocricocentesis was performed with 2.5 mL of 2% tetracaine for endotracheal surface anesthesia, and intravenous injections of midazolam, etomidate, and rocuronium were then administered. The patients’ tracheas were intubated and their ventilatory rate was adjusted to maintain the partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide at 30 to 35 mmHg. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. The ETsevo was adjusted to maintain anesthesia at 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 minimum alveolar concentration for 15 minutes each, and the PRi, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate were recorded at each concentration.

Results

A negative correlation was found between the PRi and ETsevo (−0.882) and between the MAP and ETsevo (−0.571). A low positive correlation was found between the PRi and MAP (0.484).

Conclusions

The PRi showed a high negative correlation with the ETsevo. Therefore, the PRi can be used to guide the depth regulation of sevoflurane anesthesia.

Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR-IPR-17012092

Low-Dose Dexmedetomidine Reduces Median Effective Concentration (EC 50) of Propofol More than Fentanyl in Unparalysed Anaesthetised Patients for I-gel Insertion: a Randomised Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Literature shows fentanyl reduces the median effective concentration (EC50) of propofol when used for various noxious stimuli. However, fentanyl combined with propofol has a depressive effect on haemodynamics. We hypothesise that low dose dexmedetomidine will reduce the propofol requirement for induction with better haemodynamic profile compared with fentanyl.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

120 ASA I/II adult patients, of age group 20 to 60 years, scheduled for elective day-care surgeries under general anaesthesia were randomised to three equally distributed groups as group D, group F and group S (control) of 40 patients each. They received infusions of dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg, fentanyl 1.5 mcg/kg and normal saline (control) respectively over 5 min prior to induction with propofol TCI (Marsh model). EC50 of propofol (primary objective) for I-gel insertion in each group was determined from the estimated effect site concentration (Ce), using Dixon's up-and-down method . Secondary objectives were propofol dose requirement and percentage change in haemodynamics during induction.

RESULTS

Our study demonstrates that low-dose dexmedetomidine premedication achieves more reduction in the EC50 (2.4 µg/ml, IQR 2.4 - 2.6 µg/ml, 95% CI 2.40 - 2.55 µg/ml) and dose of propofol (1.14 ± 0.28 mg/kg, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.23 mg/kg), for I-gel insertion, than that can be achieved by the use of fentanyl with propofol (EC50 of 3.0 µg/ml IQR 3.0 - 3.05 µg/ml, 95% CI 2.94 - 3.11 µg/ml; propofol dose 1.89 ± 0.55 mg/kg, 95% CI 1.72 - 2.07 mg/kg ) without any significant change in the haemodynamics.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose dexmedetomidine when compared with fentanyl significantly reduce the EC50 and dose of propofol required for I-gel insertion with propofol TCI, without much change in the haemodynamic profile.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CTRI/2019/03/018003.

Management of Ambulatory Anesthesia in Older Adults

The number of older patients is increasing globally. Combined with the growing number of ambulatory surgeries, many older patients will undergo ambulatory surgery in the future. The ambulatory setting offers many advantages: early mobilization, higher patient satisfaction, lower costs, and a low incidence of several complications such as infections and thromboembolic events. Moreover, cognitive recovery seems to be enhanced compared with in-hospital surgery, and both frail patients and patients with dementia can benefit from ambulatory surgery. This review provides suggestions for managing perioperative anesthesia for older patients in the ambulatory setting. Not all older patients are eligible for ambulatory surgery, and clinicians must be aware of risk factors for complications, especially frailty. Most anesthesia techniques and agents can be used in the ambulatory setting, but short-acting agents are preferred to ensure fast recovery. Both regional and general anesthesia are useful, but clinicians must be familiar with the physiological changes and specific implications in the older population. The older patients are more sensitive to anesthetic agents, meaning that a lower dose is needed to obtain the desired effect. However, they exhibit huge variation in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. Prolonged onset time may lead to overdosing and extended recovery. After surgery, effective pain management with opioid minimization is essential to ensure rapid recovery.

Impact of concurrent remifentanil on the sedative effects of remimazolam, midazolam and propofol in cynomolgus monkeys

Drug-drug interactions can substantially change pharmacological effects of the individual substances involved. For the use of sedatives or anaesthetics, having knowledge of the extent and characteristics of such interactions is crucial for ensuring the proper protection of patients undergoing any kind of sedation. Remimazolam is a new ultra-short acting benzodiazepine that is currently under development for intravenous use in procedural sedation and general anaesthesia. It exhibits a fast onset and fast offset which enables a more rapid recovery than currently available drugs in that class, such as midazolam. The purpose of this study was to more closely investigate the sedative properties and pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction potential of remimazolam with the opioid analgesic remifentanil and compare it with other commonly used sedatives - midazolam and propofol. For this purpose, six Cynomolgus monkeys received escalating doses of remimazolam, propofol, and midazolam intravenously without or with concurrent remifentanil. Sedation was evaluated using a general sedation scale that included monitoring exploratory and avoidance behaviour, responses to sensory stimuli, posture and gait, and eyelid position as endpoints. Based on the results, sedative doses were calculated to allow evaluation of pharmacological drug-drug interaction with remifentanil. Remimazolam induced dose-dependent and consistent sedative effects in each endpoint tested and showed a high degree of synergism with remifentanil. Midazolam showed a comparable synergism while the interaction between propofol and remifentanil was less pronounced.

Bioelectrical impedance analysis of body composition for the anesthetic induction dose of propofol in older patients

Background

Older people are currently the fastest growing segment of the worldwide population. The present study aimed to estimate propofol dose in older patients based on size descriptors measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).

Methods

A cross sectional study in adult and older patients with body mass index equal to or lower than 35 kg/m² was carried out. BIA and Clinical Frail Scale scoring were performed during pre-operative evaluation. Propofol infusion was started at 2000 mg/h until loss of consciousness (LOC) which was defined by “loss of eye-lash reflex” and “loss of response to name calling”. Total dose of propofol at LOC was recorded. Propofol plasma concentration was measured using gas chromatography/ion trap-mass spectrometry.

Results

Forty patients were enrolled in the study. Total propofol dose required to LOC was lower in Age ≥ 65 group and a higher plasma propofol concentration was measured in this group. 60% of old patients were classified as “apparently vulnerable” or “frail” and narrow phase angle values were associated with increasing vulnerability scores. In the Age ≥ 65 group, the correlation analysis showed that the relationship between propofol dose and total body weight (TBW) scaled by the corresponding phase angle value is stronger than the correlation between propofol dose and TBW or fat free mass (FFM).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that weight-based reduction of propofol is suitable in older patients; however FFM was not seen to be more effective than TBW to predict the propofol induction dose in these patients. Guiding propofol induction dose according to baseline frailty score should also be considered to estimate individualized dosage profiles. Determination of phase angle value appears to be an easy and reliable tool to assess frailty in older patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02713698. Registered on 23 February 2016.

Effect of varying time intervals between fentanyl and propofol administration on propofol requirement for induction of anaesthesia: Randomised controlled trial

Background and Aims:

Administration of fentanyl before induction of anaesthesia with propofol should facilitate smooth induction, with a reduction in induction dose of propofol and its side effects. This study was designed to examine the effect of varying intervals between fentanyl and propofol administration on the dose of propofol required for induction of anaesthesia.

Methods:

After institutional ethical clearance, 129 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I--II patients, aged 18--65 years, undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised into three groups. Fentanyl 2 mcg/kg was administered immediately prior to, 3 and 5 min before induction with propofol in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Requirement of propofol induction dose and haemodynamic parameters was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using software SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Results:

Total dose of propofol required for induction was highest in Groups 1 and lowest Group 3 (Group 1 vs. 2 vs. 3: 86.28 ± 21.12 vs. 71.67 ± 21.68 vs. 59.98 ± 20.35 mg, P < 0.00001). Dose of propofol required per kg body weight was significantly higher in Group 1 (1.41 ± 0.34 mg/kg) compared to both Group 2 (1.14 ± 0.38 mg/kg) and Group 3 (0.97 ± 0.32 mg/kg) (P < 0.00001). Incidence of hypotension during induction was significantly lower in Group 3 (14%) and Group 2 (17.1%) than in Group 1 (35.6%; P = 0.03).

Conclusion:

Administering fentanyl 5 min prior to propofol causes marked reduction in the dose requirement of the latter along with a significantly decreased incidence of hypotension during induction.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol

Propofol is an intravenous hypnotic drug that is used for induction and maintenance of sedation and general anaesthesia. It exerts its effects through potentiation of the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) at the GABAA receptor, and has gained widespread use due to its favourable drug effect profile. The main adverse effects are disturbances in cardiopulmonary physiology. Due to its narrow therapeutic margin, propofol should only be administered by practitioners trained and experienced in providing general anaesthesia. Many pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) models for propofol exist. Some are used to inform drug dosing guidelines, and some are also implemented in so-called target-controlled infusion devices, to calculate the infusion rates required for user-defined target plasma or effect-site concentrations. Most of the models were designed for use in a specific and well-defined patient category. However, models applicable in a more general population have recently been developed and published. The most recent example is the general purpose propofol model developed by Eleveld and colleagues. Retrospective predictive performance evaluations show that this model performs as well as, or even better than, PK models developed for specific populations, such as adults, children or the obese; however, prospective evaluation of the model is still required. Propofol undergoes extensive PK and PD interactions with both other hypnotic drugs and opioids. PD interactions are the most clinically significant, and, with other hypnotics, tend to be additive, whereas interactions with opioids tend to be highly synergistic. Response surface modelling provides a tool to gain understanding and explore these complex interactions. Visual displays illustrating the effect of these interactions in real time can aid clinicians in optimal drug dosing while minimizing adverse effects. In this review, we provide an overview of the PK and PD of propofol in order to refresh readers' knowledge of its clinical applications, while discussing the main avenues of research where significant recent advances have been made.

Terminal Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilation: A Hospice Perspective for the Intensivist

The intensive care unit (ICU) and hospice inpatient unit (IPU) environments differ in many ways. Although both endeavor to provide the best care possible for their patients, the day-to-day goals of these environments are almost antithetical. Similarly, the experiences and expertise of the staff differ. When performing a similar clinical task, it may be addressed in different ways because each group is engrained in their primary day-to-day focus. Terminal withdrawal of mechanical ventilation is a procedure that is performed in both ICUs and some hospice IPUs. Previous examinations of this subject have been based largely upon the correlative background, practices, and perceptions of the ICU prescriber. The purpose of this review is to examine how the manner in which this procedure is performed in the hospice environment may differ in ways that the intensivist can incorporate into their own plan of care, or better appreciate when making the decision to remove mechanical ventilation in the critical care unit or transfer the patient to a hospice environment for the procedure to be completed.

Genome-wide scan identifies candidate loci related to remifentanil requirements during laparoscopic-assisted colectomy

AIM

 Opioids are widely used as effective analgesics, but opioid sensitivity is well known to vary widely among individuals. We explored the genetic factors that contribute to individual differences in intraoperative opioid sensitivity by performing a genome-wide association study.

PATIENTS & METHODS

We conducted a multistage genome-wide association study in subjects who underwent laparoscopic-assisted colectomy.

RESULTS

A nonsynonymous SNP, rs199670311, within the TMEM8A gene region and intronic SNPs, including rs4839603, within the SLC9A9 gene region were significantly associated with intraoperative opioid requirements (p = 3.409 × 10^-8 in the dominant model for rs199670311; p = 4.162 × 10^-6 and p = 4.229 × 10^-6 in the additive and recessive models, respectively, for rs4839603). The A and T alleles of the rs199670311 and rs4839603 SNPs, respectively, were associated with lower opioid sensitivity in patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide valuable information for personalized pain treatment during laparoscopic-assisted colectomy.

A comparison of haemodynamic responses between clinical assessment-guided tracheal intubation and neuromuscular block monitoring-guided tracheal intubation: A prospective, randomised study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation and their hazards are well documented. The purpose of the study was to compare the effects of laryngoscopy and intubation on cardiovascular responses when the appropriate moment for intubation was directed by either clinical judgment or train-of-four assessment.

METHODS

A total of 68 patients, posted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were randomised into two groups. In Group M patients, the trachea was intubated after train of four counts became zero in adductor pollicis muscle, whereas in Group C patients, the trachea was intubated after the clinical judgment of jaw muscle relaxation. Changes in heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure, intubating conditions and the time between the administration of a neuromuscular blocking agent and endotracheal intubation were recorded. Results were analysed by the Analysis of variance and chi-square tests.

RESULTS

HR and mean arterial pressure were significantly higher in Group C as compared to Group M after laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation (P < 0.05). The mean time required for intubation was significantly shorter in Group C compared to Group M (175 ± 7 s vs. 385 ± 101 s). Excellent and good intubation conditions were observed in all Group M patients, whereas 24 out of 34 patients (70%) in Group C showed excellent and good intubation conditions.

CONCLUSION

Haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation can be significantly attenuated if tracheal intubation is performed following complete paralysis of laryngeal muscles, detected by neuromuscular monitoring of adductor pollicis muscle.

Pharmacologic Considerations of Anesthetic Agents in Geriatric Patients

Aging is a natural process of declining organ function and reserve. Census data show that the geriatric population is expected to grow to nearly 30%. More than half of geriatric patients have 1 or more surgical procedures in their lifetimes. Moreover, this is the population at greatest risk of morbidity and mortality with any given complication. There is remarkable variability in health across the age spectrum, from fit to frail and compromised. This variability requires a unique approach to anesthetic delivery and drug dosing on an individual basis to avoid complications such as postoperative cognitive dysfunction and delirium.

A Review of Agents for Palliative Sedation/Continuous Deep Sedation: Pharmacology and Practical Applications

Continuous deep sedation at the end of life is a specific form of palliative sedation requiring a care plan that essentially places and maintains the patient in an unresponsive state because their symptoms are refractory to any other interventions. Because this application is uncommon, many providers may lack practical experience in this specialized area and resources they can access are outdated, nonspecific, and/or not comprehensive. The purpose of this review is to provide an evidence- and experience-based reference that specifically addresses those medications and regimens and their practical applications for this very narrow, but vital, aspect of hospice care. Patient goals in a hospital and hospice environments are different, so the manner in which widely used sedatives are dosed and applied can differ greatly as well. Parameters applied in end-of-life care that are based on experience and a thorough understanding of the pharmacology of those medications will differ from those applied in an intensive care unit or other medical environments. By recognizing these different goals and applying well-founded regimens geared specifically for end-of-life sedation, we can address our patients' symptoms in a more timely and efficacious manner.

Individual indicators of appropriate hypnotic level during propofol anesthesia: highest alpha power and effect-site concentrations of propofol at loss of response

BACKGROUND

Electroencephalogram (EEG) waveforms vary widely among individuals, this decreases the usefulness of BIS™ monitors for assessing the effects of propofol. Practically, anesthesia is only seen as too deep when evidence of burst-suppression is seen. We designed an experiment to help towards better assessment of individual anesthetic needs. First, to mark the Ce (effect-site concentration) of propofol at loss of response to calling name and gently shaking shoulders (LOR), we defined Ce-LOR. To mark the transient power increase in the alpha range (9-14 Hz), common to all patients, when propofol concentration gradually increases, we defined Ce-alpha as the highest recorded alpha power for Ce. We also defined Ce-OBS as the Ce of propofol at initial observation of burst-suppression. Then we tried to predict Ce-LOR and Ce-alpha from Ce-OBS, vice versa, and considered the significance of these parameters.

METHODS

We enrolled 26 female patients (age 33-65) who were undergoing scheduled mastectomy. During anesthesia, we recorded all raw EEG packets as well as EEG-derived parameters on a computer from BIS-XP™ monitor. Propofol was infused using a TCI pump. Target concentration was adjusted so that Ce of propofol was gradually increased.

RESULTS

We obtained the following regression equation; Ce-alpha or Ce-OBS = Ce-LOR × 0.87 + 1.06 + dummy × 0.83 (for Ce-alpha dummy = 0, and for Ce-OBS = 1; adjusted r = 0.90, p < 2.2e-16) by ANCOVA. At Ce-alpha, BIS was 50.2 ± 7.7.

CONCLUSION

Ce-alpha and Ce-OBS could be estimated from Ce-LOR. Based on Ce-LOR it is possible to manage the hypnotic level of individual patients.

Preliminary Intraoperative Validation of the Nociception Level Index

Background

The nociception level (NoL) index is an index of nociception based on nonlinear combination of heart rate, heart rate variability, photoplethysmograph wave amplitude, skin conductance, skin conductance fluctuations, and their time derivatives. The authors evaluated the abilities of the NoL index and other measures of nociception to discriminate between noxious and nonnoxious stimuli, to progressively respond to graded stimuli, and to respond to opioid administration.

Methods

Intraoperative NoL was compared to heart rate, pulse plethysmograph amplitude, noninvasive blood pressure, and the surgical pleth index around five specific stimuli: tetanic stimulation with and without fentanyl analgesia, intubation, first incision/trocar insertion, and a nonnoxious period. The response around first incision was analyzed at two target plasma concentrations of remifentanil.

Results

In 58 patients, the NoL index responded progressively to increased stimulus intensity and remained unchanged in response to nonnoxious stimuli. Compared to other accepted measures of nociception, the NoL index better discriminated noxious from nonnoxious stimuli with an area under the curve of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89 to 0.97) and a sensitivity of 87% at a specificity of 84%. The NoL index was the only measure that reliably reflected two different analgesic concentrations of remifentanil during initial skin incision or trocar insertion.

Conclusions

The NoL index changes proportionately with patients’ response to various clinical and experimental noxious stimuli and discriminates noxious from nonnoxious stimuli with high sensitivity and specificity. The NoL index also responds progressively to increasing stimuli intensity and is appropriately blunted by analgesic administration. The NoL index was superior to other compared measures and appears to accurately characterize nociception during general anesthesia.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of anesthetic drugs: from modeling to clinical use

Anesthesia is a combination of unconsciousness, amnesia, and analgesia, expressed in sleeping patients by limited reaction to noxious stimulations. It is achieved by several classes of drugs, acting mainly on central nervous system. Compared to other therapeutic families, the anesthetic drugs, administered by intravenous or pulmonary route, are quickly distributed in the blood and induce in a few minutes effects that are fully reversible within minutes or hours. These effects change in parallel with the concentration of the drug, and the concentration time course of the drug follows with a reasonable precision mathematical models based on the Fick principle. Therefore, understanding concentration time course allows adjusting the dosing delivery scheme in order to control the effects.   The purpose of this short review is to describe the basis of pharmacokinetics and modeling, the concentration-effects relationship, and drug interactions modeling to offer to anesthesiologists and non-anesthesiologists an overview of the rules to follow to optimize anesthetic drug delivery.

Better Hemodynamic Profile of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Compared to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation

Background:

Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation can cause serious cardiovascular responses in patients such as hypertension, tachycardia, and arrhythmias. Alternative airway maintenance techniques may attenuate these hemodynamic stress responses.

Objectives:

This study aimed to compare the immediate hemodynamic effects of the insertion of laryngeal mask airway supreme (LMA-S) and classic (LMA-C) with laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation (ETT).

Patients and Methods:

This study was a prospective, double-blind, and randomized clinical trial conducted on 150 patients aged 18 to 50 years with ASA I (American Society of Anesthesiologists), in the general operating room of Shahid Mohammadi hospital, Hormozgan university of medical sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran. In the ETT group, endotracheal intubation was performed using the Macintosh laryngoscope; while for the LMA-C and LMA-S groups, LMA Classic and LMA Supreme were inserted, respectively. The induction and maintenance of anesthesia were similar in all patients. The hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured before (baseline) and after induction of anesthesia at 4 different time points. The statistical analysis was done and P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results:

Participants in all groups were similar in terms of gender, age, weight, height, and Mallampati class. The mean ± SD of SBPs (105.62 ± 12.12, 112.90 ± 12.2, and 112.48 ± 15.14 mm Hg, respectively for ETT, LMA-C, and LMA-S) and DBPs (64.64 ± 10.23, 73.78 ± 9.70, and 71.20 ± 12.27 mm Hg, respectively for ETT, LMA-C, and LMA-S) were significantly lower in the ETT group compared to LMA groups 5 minutes after device insertion (P < 0.01 for SBPs and P < 0.001 for DBPs); however these values were lower than the baseline values in all groups. There were no differences in the mean SBP and DBPs between the three groups at the other time points. The mean ± SD heart rates in the ETT group, compared to the LMA-C and LMA-S groups, were considerably higher in the first minute (100.06 ± 18.27, 82.50 ± 10.52, and 82.00 ± 13.60 bpm, respectively for ETT, LMA-C, and LMA-S), third minute (91.04 ± 17.12, 78.84 ± 11.23, and 78.90 ± 13.41 bpm, respectively for ETT, LMA-C, and LMA-S) and fifth minute (85.82 ± 16.01, 75.78 ± 11.73, and 75.04 ± 13.90 bpm, respectively for ETT, LMA-C, and LMA-S) after intubation (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the LMA-C and LMA-S groups in terms of hemodynamic parameters.

Conclusions:

Maintaining the airway using laryngeal mask airway is associated with less cardiovascular responses compared to direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.

Estimation of effect-site concentration of propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion using fentanyl or morphine as adjuvant

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Insertion of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) requires adequate depth of anaesthesia, which provides jaw relaxation and suppression of upper airway reflexes. Propofol can provide these conditions especially when combined with narcotics. This study had been designed to find out the effect-site concentration (EC50) of propofol using target controlled infusion (TCI) when fentanyl or morphine is added as an adjuvant.

METHODS

Patients satisfying inclusion criteria were divided into fentanyl and morphine groups. Intravenous glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg was given 15 min before induction. Patients were given either intravenous fentanyl (1 μg/kg) or morphine (0.1 mg/kg) before propofol infusion depending on the group. Patients in either groups were induced by continuous infusion of propofol at an EC of 6 μg/mL by TCI with Schneider pharmacokinetic model. The LMA supreme of appropriate size was inserted 1 min after achieving target concentration. Patient movement at LMA insertion or within 1 min of insertion was classified as failure. For subsequent patients, the target EC was increased/decreased depending on previous patients' response. Dixons up and down method was used to determine the EC50. The EC50 is defined as the mean of crossover midpoints in each pair of failure to success.

RESULTS

The EC50 of propofol in the fentanyl group for LMA insertion was 5.95 ± 0.6 μg/ml and morphine group was 5.75 ± 0.8 μg/ml. No significant difference in insertion conditions was noticed between the two groups (P = 0.3).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that there was no significant difference in propofol EC50 for insertion of LMA and insertion conditions were similar when fentanyl or morphine was used as an adjuvant drug.

Intravenous lidocaine increases the depth of anaesthesia of propofol for skin incision--a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The anaesthetic potency of intravenous propofol is quantified by its Cp50 value, which is defined as the plasma concentration required to prevent movement response in 50% of patients to surgical stimuli. We hypothesised that, in addition to propofol anaesthesia, an intravenous bolus of lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg will decrease the Cp50 value of propofol during anaesthesia.

METHODS

We enrolled 54 elective surgical patients undergoing propofol-based anaesthesia, and randomised them to either lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg, lidocaine 0.5 mg/kg or placebo (NaCl 0.9%) 3 min before skin incision. The propofol Cp50 value was then calculated using the 'up-and-down' method of Dixon and Massey.

RESULTS

There was no significant reduction in propofol requirements after the administration of 0.5 mg/kg lidocaine from 8.5 μg/ml [confidence interval (CI) 6.0-11.625] to 8.25 μg/ml (CI 6.75-9.76); however, a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine decreased the Cp50 value of propofol by 42% from 8.5 μg/ml (CI 6.0-11.625) to 4.92 μg/ml (CI 4.5-5.78) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

An intravenous bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine 2% caused a significant reduction of the propofol Cp50 value.

The fentanyl concentration required for immobility under propofol anesthesia is reduced by pre-treatment with flurbiprofen axetil

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs decrease the plasma fentanyl concentration required to produce immobility in 50% of patients in response to skin incision (Cp50incision) compared with placebo under target-controlled infusion (TCI) propofol anesthesia.

METHODS

Sixty-two unpremedicated patients scheduled to undergo gynecologic laparoscopy were randomly assigned to receive placebo (control group) or flurbiprofen axetil 1 mg·kg(-1) (flurbiprofen group) preoperatively. General anesthesia was induced with fentanyl and propofol, and intubation was performed after succinylcholine 1 mg·kg(-1). Propofol was administered via a target-controlled infusion (TCI) system (Diprifusor™) set at an effect-site concentration of 5 μg·mL(-1). Fentanyl was given by a TCI system using the STANPUMP software (Schafer model). The concentration for the first patient was set at 3 ng·mL(-1) and modified in each group according to the up-down method. Skin incision was performed after more than ten minutes equilibration time. Serum fentanyl concentration, bispectral index (BIS), and hemodynamic parameters were measured two minutes before and after skin incision. The Cp50incision of fentanyl was derived from the mean of the crossovers (i.e., the serum fentanyl concentrations of successive participants who responded and those who did not or vice versa).

RESULTS

Ten and 11 independent crossover pairs were collected in the control and flurbiprofen groups, respectively, representing 42 of 62 enrolled patients. The mean (SD) fentanyl Cp50incision was less in the flurbiprofen group [0.84 (0.63) ng·mL(-1)] than in the control group [1.65 (1.15) ng·mL(-1)]; P = 0.007; however, there were no differences in BIS, blood pressure, or heart rate, between groups.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative flurbiprofen axetil decreased the Cp50incision of fentanyl by 49% during propofol anesthesia without changing the BIS or hemodynamic variables.

Time to extubation during propofol anesthesia for spine surgery with sufentanil compared with fentanyl: a retrospective cohort study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

This study compares time to extubation between major spine surgery patients anesthetized with fentanyl versus sufentanil infusions in combination with propofol.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In patients undergoing spinal fusion with intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord, total intravenous anesthesia with a propofol/opioid combination results in better electrophysiological signals compared with volatile anesthetics. Pharmacokinetic data suggest that total intravenous anesthesia with sufentanil should lead to more rapid emergence from anesthesia than with fentanyl. However, this has never been tested in the spine surgery patient population.

METHODS

With institutional review board approval, all major spine patients receiving a propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia with fentanyl were compared with those receiving sufentanil. Time to extubation, defined as the time from surgical closure to tracheal extubation, was the study outcome. Relevant demographic, anthropomorphic, anesthetic, and surgical data were collected. Association between type of opioid and time to extubation was tested for statistical significance. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to control for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 167 patients met inclusion criteria (fentanyl = 72, sufentanil = 95). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of baseline characteristics. Time from surgical closure to extubation in the fentanyl versus sufentanil groups was not statistically different (mean [SD]: 40.2 [26.7] min vs. 45.0 [36.9] min; P = 0.36). On multivariate analysis, total dose of propofol and male sex were associated with increased time to extubation.

CONCLUSION

The use of sufentanil may not reduce time to extubation compared with fentanyl despite its favorable pharmacokinetic profile. Higher doses of propofol and male sex were associated with longer time to extubation and seem to play a greater role than choice of opioid.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Propofol modulates phasic and tonic GABAergic currents in spinal ventral horn interneurones

BACKGROUND

Surgical interventions like skin incisions trigger withdrawal reflexes which require motor neurones and local circuit interneurones in the spinal ventral horn. This region plays a key role in mediating immobilizing properties of the GABAergic anaesthetic propofol. However, it is unclear how propofol modulates GABA(A) receptors in the spinal ventral horn and whether tonic or phasic inhibition is involved.

METHODS

Organotypic spinal cord tissue slices were prepared from mice. Whole-cell recordings were performed for quantifying effects of propofol on GABA(A) receptor-mediated phasic transmission and tonic conductance.

RESULTS

Propofol increased GABAergic phasic transmission by a prolongation of the decay time constant in a concentration-dependent manner. The amount of the charge transferred per inhibitory post-synaptic current, described by the area under the curve, was significantly augmented by 1 µM propofol (P<0.01). A GABA(A) receptor-mediated tonic current was not induced by 1 µM propofol but at a concentration of 5 µM (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol depresses ventral horn interneurones predominantly by phasic rather than by tonic GABA(A) receptor-mediated inhibition. However, the present results suggest that the involvement of a tonic inhibition might contribute to the efficacy of propofol to depress nociceptive reflexes at high concentrations of the anaesthetic.

How to control propofol infusion in pediatric patients undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery

INTRODUCTION

Although Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) is commonly performed under local anesthesia, general anesthesia is sometimes required. The authors previously reported a remote-controlled patient management system consisting of propofol-based general anesthesia with a target-controlled infusion (TCI) that we designed for pediatric GKS. However, a commercially available propofol TCI system has age and weight limitations (<16 years and <30 kg). We examined a manually controlled regimen of propofol appropriate for pediatric GKS.

METHODS

A pharmacokinetic model of the TIVA Trainer© with Paedfusor's parameter was used. A manually controlled infusion scheme to achieve a sufficient level of propofol for pediatric GKS was examined in five models ranging from 10 to 30 kg.

RESULTS

Following a loading dose of 3.0 mg/kg, the combination of continuous infusion of 14, 12, 10, and 8 mg/kg/h resulted in a target concentration of 3.0-4.0 μg/ml, the required level for pediatric GKS.

CONCLUSION

Propofol titration is a key issue in GKS. Manual infusion is less accurate than TCI, but the combination of a small bolus and continuous infusion might be a substitute. Considering the characteristics of propofol pharmacokinetics in children, co-administration of opioids is recommended.

Propofol decreases the axonal excitability in rat primary sensory afferents

AIMS

The aim of this present study was to investigate the changes of peripheral sensory nerve excitability produced by propofol.

MAIN METHODS

In a recently described in vitro model of rodent saphenous nerve we used the technique of threshold tracking (QTRAC®) to measure changes of axonal nerve excitability of Aβ-fibres caused by propofol. Concentrations of 10 μMol, 100 μMol and 1000 μMol were tested. Latency, peak response, strength-duration time constant (τSD) and recovery cycle of the sensory neuronal action potential (SNAP) were recorded.

KEY FINDINGS

Our results have shown that propofol decreases nerve excitability of rat primary sensory afferents in vitro. Latency increased with increasing concentrations (0μMol: 0.96 ± 0.07ms; 1000μMol 1.10 ± 0.06ms, P<0.01). Also, propofol prolonged the relative refractory period (0μMol: 1.79 ± 1.13ms; 100 μMol: 2.53 ± 1.38ms, P<0.01), and reduced superexcitability (0 μMol: -14.0±4.0%; 100μMol: -9.5 ± 5.5%) and subexcitability (0μMol: 7.5 ± 1.2%; 1000μMol: 3.6 ± 1.2) significantly during the recovery cycle (P<0.01).

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results have shown that propofol decreases nerve excitability of primary sensory afferents. The technique of threshold tracking revealed that axonal voltage-gated ion channels are significantly affected by propofol and therefore might be at least partially responsible for earlier described analgesic effects.

Pharmacology in the elderly and newer anaesthesia drugs

In developed countries, a growing proportion of patients presenting for anesthesia and surgery are elderly. Despite this, and the fact that aging is known to be associated with alterations in drug pharmacokinetics and dynamics, there is little detailed information about the impact of aging on the pharmacology of commonly used anesthetic agents. In this review, we discuss existing current knowledge on the physiological changes that occur with age and the way these changes affect the pharmacokinetics and dynamics of anesthetic agents. Also, an overview of up-to-date PK-PD modeling concepts and their usefulness and limitations in modern anesthesiologic practice with respect to the elderly population is given. Finally, newer agents such as sugammadex, remifentanyl, ropivacaine and desflurane are discussed in detail with emphasis on current evidence concerning dosing, safety and efficacy of their use in the elderly.

Bi-spectral index, entropy and predicted plasma propofol concentrations with target controlled infusions in Indian patients

OBJECTIVE

Many processed electroencephalographic signals are used now to help the anaesthesiologist titrate the depth of sedation. We investigated the relationship between target plasma propofol concentration and objective end-points of sedation- Bispectral Index (BIS), State Entropy (SE) and Response Entropy (RE)-at clinical end-points as assessed by Modified Observer Assessment of Alertness/sedation Scale (MOAAS) in Indian patients.

METHODS

Eighteen ASA 1 and 2 Indian adult patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery were included. The target control infusion (TCI) of propofol was administered using 'Diprifusor'. The level of sedation was assessed using MOAAS by the anaesthesiologist. BIS, SE, RE were recorded throughout. TCI was started at 0.5 μg/ml and increased by 0.5 μg/ml every 6 min till MOAAS scores reached 0 or there was sustained BIS value less than 30.

RESULTS

The EC(50) and EC(95) of predicted plasma propofol concentration for loss of consciousness (assessed by loss of response to verbal command), were 2.3 and 2.8 μg/ml respectively and for loss of response to painful stimuli (trapezius squeeze) were 4.0 and 5.0 μg/ml respectively. The BIS and entropy values (EC(50) and EC(95)) for loss of consciousness and response to painful stimuli in Indian patients were estimated. The preliminary relation of target plasma propofol concentration with BIS was found to be BIS = 100.5-16.4 × (Target concentration).

CONCLUSIONS

The target plasma propofol concentrations required to produce unconsciousness and loss of response to painful stimuli in Indian patients have been estimated. Also, the relations between target plasma concentration and objective measures of different levels of anaesthesia have been established.

Pretreatment with small-dose ketamine reduces predicted effect-site concentration of propofol required for loss of consciousness and Laryngeal Mask Airway insertion in women

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of small-dose ketamine on the predicted effect-site concentration of propofol required for loss of consciousness (LOC) and Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) insertion.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blinded study.

SETTINGS

Operating room.

PATIENTS

50 ASA physical status 1 and 2 women scheduled for elective breast or gynecological surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly allocated to a ketamine group or a control group. Thirty seconds before propofol injection, ketamine group patients received ketamine 0.2 mg/kg, while control group patients received saline. Propofol was given in a target-controlled infusion and target blood concentration was gradually increased until LOC. The effect-site concentrations for attempting LMA insertion was predetermined by modifying Dixon's up and down method. LMA insertion was attempted without muscular blocking agents.

MEASUREMENTS

Pain scores on propofol injection, effect-site concentrations at LOC, hemodynamic variables, and patient movement or side effects on LMA insertion were recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

The effect-site concentration of propofol required for LOC was 2.14 μg/mL for the control group and 1.66 for the ketamine group (P = 0.0082). The predicted effect-site concentration of propofol alone at which 50% of patients did not move with LMA insertion (EC(50)LMI) was 3.59 μg/mL (95% CI: 3.18 ∼ 4.19 μg/mL). Pretreatment with ketamine 0.2 mg/kg decreased EC(50)LMI from 3.59 (3.18 ∼ 4.19) to 2.39 (1.22 ∼ 2.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with ketamine 0.2 mg/kg reduced the propofol concentration required for both LOC (22%) and LMA insertion (33%) in women.

Fentanyl activates hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in neuronal SH-SY5Y cells and mice under non-hypoxic conditions in a μ-opioid receptor-dependent manner

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) is the main transcription factor responsible for hypoxia-induced gene expression. Perioperative drugs including anesthetics have been reported to affect HIF-1 activity. However, the effect of fentanyl on HIF-1 activity is not well documented. In this study, we investigated the effect of fentanyl and other opioids on HIF-1 activity in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, hepatoma Hep3B cells, lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells and mice. Cells were exposed to fentanyl, and HIF-1 protein expression was examined by Western blot analysis using anti-HIF-1α and β antibodies. HIF-1-dependent gene expression was investigated by semi-quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR (qRT-PCR) and luciferase assay. Furthermore, fentanyl was administered intraperitoneally and HIF-1-dependent gene expression was investigated by qRT-PCR in the brains and kidneys of mice. A 10-μM concentration of fentanyl and other opioids, including 1 μM morphine and 4 μM remifentanil, induced HIF-1α protein expression and HIF-1 target gene expression in an opioid receptor-dependent manner in SH-SY5Y cells with activity peaking at 24h. Fentanyl did not augment HIF-1α expression during hypoxia-induced induction. HIF-1α stabilization assays and experiments with cycloheximide revealed that fentanyl increased translation from HIF-1α mRNA but did not stabilize the HIF-1α protein. Furthermore, fentanyl induced HIF-1 target gene expression in the brains of mice but not in their kidneys in a naloxone-sensitive manner. In this report, we describe for the first time that fentanyl, both in vitro and in vivo, induces HIF-1 activation under non-hypoxic conditions, leading to increases in expression of genes associated with adaptation to hypoxia.

Dose-dependent remifentanil decreases oral tissue blood flow during sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia in rabbits

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of remifentanil continuous infusion on the blood flow in rabbit oral tissue during propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia, as well as its dose dependency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen male tracheotomized Japan white rabbits were anesthetized with propofol or sevoflurane under mechanical ventilation. The infusion rate of remifentanil was 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 μg·kg(-1)·min(-1), respectively, for 20 minutes. Observed variables were systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), common carotid artery blood flow, tongue mucosal blood flow (TBF), mandibular bone marrow blood flow (BBF), masseter muscle blood flow (MBF), upper alveolar tissue blood flow (UBF), and lower alveolar tissue blood flow (LBF).

RESULTS

HR, SBP, MAP, TBF, BBF, MBF, UBF, and LBF showed dose-dependent decreases during remifentanil infusion with both propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia. The decreases in BBF, MBF, UBF, and LBF explained as a percent change were greater than those in HR, SBP, MAP, and TBF. In the sevoflurane group, there were no changes in diastolic blood pressure and common carotid artery blood flow during remifentanil infusion.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that infusion of remifentanil reduces TBF, BBF, MBF, UBF, and LBF in a dose-dependent manner without a significant reduction in MAP during propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia.

Comparison of auditory evoked potential index and clinical signs as indicator for laryngeal mask airway insertion

OBJECTIVE

Auditory evoked potential (AEP) index is one of the several physiological parameters for assessing the depth of anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the AEP monitoring could provide a better information for assessment of anesthesia level in classic laryngeal mask airway (C-LMA) insertion than the use of clinical signs in general anesthesia with single standard dose of intravenous propofol and fentanyl.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy adult patients requiring general anesthesia for minor surgery were recruited and randomized to receive AEP monitoring (group A) or judgment of clinical signs (group B) for assessment of anesthesia depth and optimal condition to insert the C-LMA. The insertion conditions, including jaw relaxation, movements, presence of airway trauma and airway reflex, successful insertion rate and induction time were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

The two groups were demographically similar. In group A, baseline heart rate was slower than group B (74 ± 14 vs. 78 ± 14 beats/min, p = 0.0267) and persisted throughout the whole study period. There was no significant difference in the change of heart rate during induction of general anesthesia between both groups. The incidence of movement was reduced in group A patients with AEP monitoring in comparison with group B patients (2.4% vs. 28.2%, p < 0.0001); of the unwanted events, swallowing was 0% versus 7.1%, p = 0.0126; laryngospasm was 0% versus 4.7%, p  = 0.0430 and emergence of airway reflex was 1.2% versus 11.8%, p = 0.0050; the successful insertion rate was 100% versus 94.1%, p = 0.0232; and jaw relaxation was 83.5% versus 70.6%, p = 0.0448. There were no differences between both groups in trauma and induction time.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that AEP index provided better information for C-LMA insertion with higher successful rate, less emergence of airway reflex and lower incidence of movement during induction of general anesthesia with single dose of intravenous propofol and fentanyl.

Titration of the plasma effect site equilibrium rate constant of propofol; a link method of 'Concentration-Probability-Time'

Background

The plasma effect-site equilibrium rate constant (k_e0) of propofol has been reported in various pharmacodynamic studies; however, it is not desirable to apply k_e0 for the link with pharmacokinetic models that were separately investigated. Thus, we titrated k_e0 for the pharmacokinetic model, which is known as the multiple covariates adjusted model of propofol.

Methods

Ninety female patients scheduled for gynecologic surgery were randomly assigned to three groups targeting different plasma concentrations of 5.4, 8.1, and 10.8 µg/ml. Target-controlled infusions (TCI) were provided by a computer-assisted continuous infusion system. Time to loss of responsiveness (LOR) was measured by a blind investigator; effect-site concentrations (C_e) for LOR were then calculated with simulation of TCI using different k_e0s. We determined the k_e0 minimizing total discrepancy (TD) between the inputted and calculated k_e0 from the t_1/2k_e0s for a given probability of LOR of the C_e, and also obtained the k_e0 for the minimal TD between the median C_e, which were compared to the known k_e0.

Results

K_e0s from these two methods were 0.3692 and 0.3788/min. C_es for LOR with these k_e0s were significantly different from those with Schnider's k_e0.

Conclusions

We proposed a method for titration of the k_e0 of propofol. The k_e0s of propofol was lower than Schnider's k_e0. An adequate k_e0 for the specific pharmacokinetic model and a certain population would be useful for prediction of an accurate C_e, and could be used for calculation of accurate dosing during targeting of the effect site.

Cognitive improvement during continuous sedation in critically ill, awake and responsive patients: the Acute Neurological ICU Sedation Trial (ANIST)

INTRODUCTION

Most anxiolytics and sedative regimens in the intensive care unit (ICU) impair intellectual function, reducing patient autonomy, and often add to patient morbidity. Using an ICU-validated cognitive assessment tool Adapted Cognitive Exam (ACE), we performed a comparison between dexmedetomidine (DEX) and propofol (PRO) to evaluate which sedative regimen offered the least decrement in intellectual capacity.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study of 30 awake and intubated brain-injured (BI, n = 18) and non-BI (12) ICU patients. Each patient received fentanyl/PRO and fentanyl/DEX titrated to a calm, awake state using a crossover design. Cognitive testing was performed at each study period using the validated 100-point Hopkins ACE cognitive battery.

FINDINGS

Sedation with PRO diminished adjusted ACE scores (100-point exam) by a mean of -12.4 (95% CI -8.3 to -16.5, p < 0.001) while DEX, in contrast, improved ACE scores (6.8, 95% CI 1.2-12.4, p < 0.018). The difference in the change of ACE score between DEX versus PRO, our primary endpoint, was 19.2 (95% CI 12.3-26.1 p < 0.001) in favor of an improved ACE score on DEX. Patients with BI required less sedative, but effects of PRO and DEX on cognition were not changed. No serious adverse events occurred. Modest bradycardia was noted post hoc with DEX (-7.7 bpm, p < 0.01).

INTERPRETATION

ICU patients may be offered sedation without necessarily compromising arousal or cognition. Alleviation of anxiety and agitation can singly and effectively improve mental engagement and performance if overt forebrain dysfunction is avoided. Higher ACE scores with DEX may be a consequence of the intellect-sparing yet calming effect of this drug.

Remifentanil decreases mandibular bone marrow blood flow during propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia in rabbits

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of remifentanil on the blood flow in rabbit oral tissues during propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two male tracheotomized Japanese white rabbits were anesthetized with propofol (P group) or sevoflurane (S group) under mechanical ventilation. Animals were further divided into 4 groups: adenosine triphosphate (ATP) treatment in the P group (P-ATP) (n = 8), remifentanil treatment in the P group (P-Remi) (n = 8), ATP treatment in the S group (S-ATP) (n = 8), and remifentanil treatment in the S group (S-Remi) (n = 8). Blood pressure, heart rate, common carotid artery blood flow (CABF), lingual mucosal blood flow (LMBF), and mandibular bone marrow blood flow (BMBF) were measured during each period before and during infusion of ATP or remifentanil.

RESULTS

Mean arterial pressure (MAP), CABF, LMBF, and BMBF showed a significant decrease in all 4 groups during infusion of the drug. Similarly, LMBF and BMBF showed significant decreases in both the ATP and remifentanil groups, whereas the decreases in MAP and CABF measured as percent change were greater in the ATP groups than in the remifentanil groups. A significant correlation was observed between CABF and BMBF in the S-Remi group. In both the P and S groups, the correlations between MAP and LMBF or BMBF were relatively strong when ATP was administered.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that infusion of remifentanil during propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia reduces BMBF and LMBF, as does deliberate hypotension by use of ATP, without a major decrease in MAP.

Time-frequency properties of electroencephalogram during induction of anesthesia

A method for detailed description of the time-frequency characteristics of electroencephalogram during induction of anesthesia is proposed. The method, based on averaging of time-normalized smoothed pseudo-Wigner-Ville distributions, is applied to data recorded from nine patients undergoing propofol anesthesia. An extensive representation of the frequency progression pattern related to the induction of anesthesia is given and the time-frequency characteristics that are consistent/not consistent between patients are determined. It is also illustrated how four different clinical end-points, generally used in the assessment of the depth of anesthesia, can be related to different phases of the frequency progression pattern. The method presented has importance in providing information about the neurophysiological phenomenon during induction of anesthesia and can therefore be used in the development of new monitoring algorithms.