Assessment of axillary lymph node status

Effect of Lump Size and Nodal Status on Prognosis in Invasive Breast Cancer: Experience from Rural India

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is now the leading cause of cancer among Indian women. Usually large tumour size and axillary lymph node involvement are linked with adverse outcome and this notion forms the basis of screening programs i.e. early detection.

AIM

The present study was carried out to analyse relationship between tumour size, lymph node status and there relation with outcome after treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients with cytology-proven invasive breast tumours were evaluated for size, clinical and pathologic characteristics of tumour, axillary lymph node status and outcome data recorded on sequential follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean age of all participated patients was 52.24±10 years. Most common tumour location was in the upper outer quadrant with mean size of primary tumour being 3.31±1.80cm. On pathology number of lymph nodes examined ranged from 10 to 24 and 72% of patients recorded presence of disease in axilla. Significant positive correlation (p<0.013; r(2)=0.026) between tumour size and axillary lymph node involvement on linear regression. Also an indicative correlation between size and grade of tumour and axillary lymph node status was found with survival from the disease.

CONCLUSION

The present study highlights that the size of the primary tumour and the number of positive lymph nodes have an inverse linear relationship with prognosis. Despite advances in diagnostic modalities, evolution of newer markers and genetic typing both size of tumour as T and axillary lymphadenopathy as N form an integral part of TNM staging and are of paramount importance for their role in treatment decisions and illustrate prognosis in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases (ALNM) in a Korean population with T1-2 breast carcinoma: triple negative breast cancer has a high incidence of ALNM irrespective of the tumor size

PURPOSE

We estimated the likelihood of breast cancer patients having axillary lymph node metastases (ALNM) based on a variety of clinical and pathologic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred sixty-one breast cancer patients without distant metastases and who underwent breast conserving surgery and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (level I and II) or modified radical mastectomy (MRM) were identified, and we retrospectively reviewed their pathology records and treatment charts.

RESULTS

Positive axillary lymph nodes were detected in 104 patients for an overall incidence of 28.8%: 2 patients (5%) with T1a tumor, 5 (9.2%) with T1b tumor, 24 (21.8%) with T1c tumor and 73 (44.2%) with T2 tumor. On the multivariate analysis, an increased tumor size (adjusted OR=11.87, p=0.02), the presence of lymphovascular invasion (adjusted OR=7.41, p<0.01), a triple negative profile (ER/PR-, Her2-) (adjusted OR=2.09, p=0.04) and a palpable mass at the time of diagnosis (adjusted OR=2.31, p=0.03) were all significant independent factors for positive ALNM.

CONCLUSION

In our study, the tumor size, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, a triple negative profile and a palpable mass were the independent predictive factors for ALNM. The tumor size was the strongest predictor of ALNM. Thus, the exact estimation of the extent of tumor is necessary for clinicians to optimize the patients' care. Patients with a triple negative profile have a high incidence of ALNM irrespective of the tumor size.

Patients with preoperatively ultrasonically uninvolved axillary lymph nodes: a distinct subgroup of early breast cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound (US) preoperative examination of the axillary lymph nodes combined with the fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is often used in order to reduce the number of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy procedures in clinically node negative breast cancer patients. The pathohistological characteristics of the ultrasonically negative axillary lymph nodes in clinically negative axillary lymph nodes are not known. The aim of our study was to compare the pathohistological characteristics of ultrasonically uninvolved axillary lymph nodes (US group) versus clinically uninvolved axillary lymph nodes (non-US group) in SLN biopsy candidates.

METHODS

We included 658 patients after SLN biopsy; 286 patients in the US group and 372 in the non-US group. The pathohistological characteristics of axillary lymph nodes were evaluated by univariate analysis and logistic regression.

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis, the proportion of macrometastastic SLN, total number of metastatic lymph nodes per patient, proportion of nonsentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastases and proportion of NSLN macrometastases were found to be lower in the US group compared to the non-US group. In the logistic regression model, only US of the axilla (p=0.010; OR: 0.57) and tumor size were significant predictors for the presence of SLN macrometastases or macrometastatic NSLN (p<0.001; OR: 0.23).

CONCLUSION

The patients with US negative axillary lymph nodes form a distinct subgroup of early breast cancer patients having a significantly lower tumor burden in the axillary lymph nodes compared to those with only clinically negative axillary lymph nodes.

Variability in axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The axillary nodal status may influence the prognosis and the choice of adjuvant treatment of individual breast cancer patients. The variation in number of reported axillary lymph nodes and its effect on the axillary nodal stage were studied and the implications are discussed.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 1997, a total of 4,806 axillary dissections for invasive breast cancers in 4,715 patients were performed in hospitals in the North-Netherlands. The factors associated with the number of reported nodes and the relation of this number with the nodal status and the number of positive nodes were studied.

RESULTS

The number of reported nodes varied significantly between pathology laboratories, the median number of nodes ranged from 9 to 15, respectively. The individual hospitals explained even more variability in the number of nodes than pathology laboratories (range in median number 8-15, P < 0.0001). The number of reported nodes increased gradually during the study period. A decreasing trend was observed with older patient age. A higher number of reported nodes was associated with a markedly increased chance of finding tumor positive nodes, especially more than three nodes. The frequency of node positivity increased from 28% if less than six nodes to 54% if >/=20 nodes were examined, the percentage of tumors with >/=4 positive nodes increased from 4 to 31%. Multivariate analysis confirmed these results.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based study showed a large variation in the number of reported lymph nodes between hospitals. A more extensive surgical dissection or histopathological examination of the specimen generally resulted in a higher number of positive nodes. Although the impact of misclassification on adjuvant treatment will have varied, the impact with regard to adjuvant regional radiotherapy may have been considerable.

The role of lymph node sampling and radiotherapy in the management of the axilla in early breast cancer

Management of the axilla in early breast cancer is an issue of ongoing debate. We reviewed our experience in 312 patients who underwent axillary lymph node sampling between 1994 and 1998, of whom 81 patients (24%) had axillary lymph node metastasis. There have been two axillary recurrences, one associated with local recurrence to the breast and one presenting with distant metastasis. There were no patients with isolated axillary disease as their only site of recurrence and no axillary failures in the node-positive group treated with axillary sampling and radiotherapy. Axillary lymph node sampling effectively stages the axilla. This can safely be followed by radiotherapy to the axilla in case of lymph node metastasis. Axillary lymph node sampling forms a sound basis to develop new techniques, such as sentinel lymph node biopsy currently investigated by ongoing trials.

MR-axillography oriented surgical sampling for assessment of nodal status in the selection of patients with breast cancer for axillary lymph nodes dissection

BACKGROUND

We have reported that magnetic resonance axillography (MR-axillography) is the best method for assessing lymph node size and representing the relation of the lymph node to normal anatomy.

METHODS

The four largest nodes on MR-axillography were sampled in 62 consecutive patients with breast cancer undergoing axillary clearance. Axillary clearance yielded a mean of 17.0 (range 5-28) nodes.

RESULTS

A method of preliminary sampling of four nodes in the axilla oriented by MR-axillography was assessed in all cases, 22 of whom were histologically node positive. Based on the sampled nodes, lymph node metastases were detected in 20 of 22 (91%) of the node-positive patients. Based on the sampled nodes, of the 19 patients with macrometastatic nodes, lymph node metastases were detected in all 19 (100%), but only in 1 of the 3 (33%) patients with only one micrometastatic node.

CONCLUSIONS

This experience indicates that sampling the four largest nodes by MR-axillography orientation accurately identifies patients with macrometaststic nodes. This result may be comparable to that of surgical sampling performed by the most skilled surgeons.

Optimal use of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection in patients with breast carcinoma: a decision analysis

BACKGROUND

There are no data available from randomized controlled trials that compare the efficacy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy with Level I/II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with breast carcinoma. We performed a formal decision analysis to determine whether SLN biopsy is appropriate, compared with ALND, for patients with T1, T2, and T3 tumors and to quantify the relative value of these two procedures in the management of patients with breast carcinoma.

METHODS

All clinically relevant outcomes were modeled for both SLN biopsy and ALND. The probabilities of complications and outcomes were derived using data from the University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study and from extensive review of previous studies. Utilities were assigned by the authors, incorporating values from the literature whenever possible.

RESULTS

The expected utility of SLN biopsy was higher than the expected utility for ALND for T1 and T2 tumors that were 4.0 cm or smaller. There was no clear preference for either procedure with tumors that were larger than 4.0 cm. The T1 and T2 results were robust to sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this decision analysis suggest that SLN biopsy is preferred over ALND for patients with breast tumors that are 4.0 cm or smaller. Patients should be aware of the potential for false-negative results in SLN biopsy, but this risk is outweighed by the decreased morbidity associated with the procedure itself.

Identification of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer by lymphoscintigraphy and surgical gamma probe with peritumoral injection of scintimammographic agent "99mTc MIbI"

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lymphoscintigraphy and the surgical gamma probe (SGP) with peritumoral injection of 99mTc MIBI in sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in breast cancer regardless of whether metastatic or not.

METHOD

Thirty patients with T1/ T2 breast cancer had peritumoral injections of 99mTc MIBI (74 MBq/0.2 ml at 4 different locations) at 2, 6 and 24 hours before surgery. Anterior, anterolateral, and lateral spot images were taken at 10, 30, 45, 60 and 120 minutes. Counts were collected from the injection site, affected breast tissue, internal mammaries, axillary and supraclavicular regions, and the contralateral side. Peritumoral blue dye was also injected at surgery. The first lymph nodes with counts twice the background tissue and/or with blue dye uptake were surgically isolated, and histopathological evaluations were made. Modified radical mastectomy was performed on all patients.

RESULTS

23/30 patients had lymph nodes in scintigrams and the sentinel lymph nodes were identified with SGP in 25/30 patients.

CONCLUSION

Lymphoscintigraphy and subsequent SGP detection with peritumoral injection of 99mTc MIBI can be used for identifying SLN in breast cancer.

A mathematical model of axillary lymph node involvement considering lymph node size in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical sampling for assessing axillary status has not been considered as a well defined surgical procedure. We have reported that MRI is a good instrument for assessing lymph node size and identifying lymph node position. We also developed a mathematical model that takes into consideration the size of axillary lymph nodes, and retrospectively determined the number and size of the axillary lymph nodes that need to be sampled from level I-II to achieve a greater than 90% probability of metastasis detection after surgical sampling, with the future aim of using MR-axillography to assess lymph node size.

METHODS

One thousand nine hundred and thirty four lymph nodes from 102 level I-II dissections performed on T1 and T2 breast cancer patients with nodal metastases were examined histologically and the greatest long-axis dimension on histologic slides was measured.

RESULTS

This model permitted determination of the cutoff level necessary for an expected probability of detection of metastasis of over 90%. The cutoff level, regardless of tumor size, is a maximum of 6 nodes removed from level I-II in which the greatest long-axis measurement is greater than or equal to 6 mm. The cutoff level in patients with macrometastatic nodes is a maximum of 3 or 4 nodes in which the long-axis dimensions are greater than or equal to 9 or 7 mm, respectively, removed from level I-II.

CONCLUSIONS

This model showed that surgical sampling on the basis of lymph node size might have good potential to detect lymph nodes metastases.

Sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer may have little to offer four-node-samplers

The aims of the study were to determine how often four node axillary sampling (4NAS) encompasses the sentinel node (SN) and to compare the relative sensitivity of 4NAS with sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for axillary node staging. 200 patients with breast cancer were preoperatively injected with 27 MBq 99m-Tc-labelled colloid adjacent to the tumour. At operation, standard 4NAS was performed. Each node was counted ex vivo using a probe. A search was then made to find a node with higher counts in vivo directed by the probe. If found, it was excised. Each node was submitted separately to pathology. A SN was identified in 191 patients (96%). The SN was contained in the 4NAS in 153 patients (80%) and identified separately in 38 patients (20%). Of 60 node-positive patients, 49 were positive by 4NAS and SNB, the SN was not identified in 2 and in 8 the SN was falsely negative compared with 4NAS. For 1 patient, the SN was positive and the 4NAS negative. SNB performed using radiolabelled colloid has no advantage over 4NAS when nodes are assessed by standard histological technique.

Prospective evaluation of the morbidity of axillary clearance for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Axillary clearance, despite its morbidity, retains an essential role in the management of patients with breast cancer. The aim of this prospective study was to document the development of arm swelling and limitation of shoulder movement following complete axillary clearance.

METHODS

One hundred patients who had axillary clearance to level III, for treatment of breast cancer, were followed prospectively for over 1 year. Arm volumes were measured using an optoelectronic volometer and shoulder movements with a goniometer.

RESULTS

Ten patients had significant arm swelling at 1 year. The swelling was mild in eight and moderate in two. No patient developed severe swelling. Reduced arm movements were noted in the first week after operation but had returned to normal at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

This study provided accurate documentation of the morbidity associated with axillary clearance, together with a reproducible method of arm volume measurement.

Axillary staging of breast cancer and the sentinel node

Pathological aspects of axillary nodal staging of breast cancer and in particular sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy are reviewed. SLN biopsy seems an almost ideal staging procedure because it has both high accuracy and a low false negative rate. It may also allow a cost effective use of more sensitive methods of metastasis detection. However, the biological relevance of metastases detected only by modern tools remains to be elucidated. This review focuses on standard axillary staging and the histopathological investigation of SLNs, with emphasis on the intraoperative setting. Future trends including ancillary studies, quality control issues, prediction of non-SLN involvement, and suggestions concerning the minimum requirements for the histology of axillary SLNs are also discussed.

Role of sentinel lymph node dissection in breast cancer

The sentinel node concept is valid for penile cancer, melanoma, breast cancer and is probably also applicable to other solid malignancies. Sentinel nodes are the one or two initial nodes in the regional nodal drainage basin encountered by the lymphatic effluent from a tumour, which can be identified with an injection of vital dye or other lymphogogue. Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND), a minimally invasive procedure with negligible morbidity, has therefore been utilized as an alternative to complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for staging breast cancer. Examination of sentinel nodes provides a focused histopathological assessment of tissue most likely to harbour metastases, providing enhanced staging accuracy with a low false-negative rate. Tumour-free sentinel nodes are predictive of a tumour-free axilla, thereby allowing for the possibility of SLND without ALND and sparing patients the morbidity of ALND. Most of the experience from SLND has been obtained for axillary sentinel nodes. However, sentinel nodes have been identified in nonaxillary sites, such as the internal mammary nodes, but data on SLND for these regions is scarce. The ultimate role of SLND in breast cancer, which may be to identify sentinel-node-negative patients or even those with sentinel node metastases who can safely avoid ALND without sacrificing regional control and possibly gain a therapeutic benefit, cannot be defined before we have the results of large trials that are currently in progress.

Morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection for patients with breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Axillary lymph node dissection for staging the axilla in breast carcinoma patients is associated with considerable morbidity, such as edema of the arm, pain, sensory disturbances, impairment of arm mobility, and shoulder stiffness. Sentinel lymph node biopsy electively removes the first lymph node, which gets the drainage from the tumor and should therefore be associated with nearly zero morbidity.

METHODS

Postoperative morbidity (increase in arm circumference, subjective lymphedema, pain, numbness, effect on arm strength and mobility, and stiffness) of the operated arm was prospectively compared in 35 breast carcinoma patients after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) of Level I and II and 35 patients following sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Postoperative follow-up was 15.4 months (range, 4-28 months) in the SN group and 17.0 months (range, 4-28 months) in the ALND group. Following axillary dissection, patients showed a significant increase in upper and forearm circumference of the operated arm compared with the SN patients, as well as a significantly higher rate of subjective lymphedema, pain, numbness, and motion restriction. No difference between the two groups was found regarding arm stiffness or arm strength, nor did the type of surgery affect daily living.

CONCLUSIONS

SN biopsy is associated with negligible morbidity compared with complete axillary lymph node dissection.

Management of the axilla in operable breast cancer treated by breast conservation: a randomized clinical trial. Edinburgh Breast Unit

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of operable breast cancer by breast conservation, the extent of axillary dissection, the need for radiotherapy to the axilla and the morbidity associated with these procedures have not been assessed adequately.

METHODS

Patients with operable breast cancer were randomized to have level III axillary node clearance (232 patients) or axillary node sample (234 patients). Radiotherapy to the axilla was given selectively. Radiotherapy was not given to those who had an axillary clearance. In the early part of the study all patients who had node sample were treated by radiotherapy (54 patients); subsequently this was modified to include only those who were node positive. The morbidity to the shoulder and arm was assessed before and after operation by measuring upper limb volume and circumference, and combined glenohumeral and scapular movement and muscle power.

RESULTS

Comparing the two surgical policies, no difference was found in local (axillary clearance 14 versus sample 15), axillary (eight versus seven) or distant (29 versus 29) recurrence. There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year survival rate (clearance 82.1 versus sample 88.6 per cent). Morbidity was least in those who had a node sample and no radiotherapy to the axilla. Radiotherapy to the axilla in patients who had a node sample resulted in a significant reduction in range of movement of the shoulder, e.g. mean(s.e.) 2.2(0.6) cm reduction in lateral rotation at 3 years. Surgical axillary clearance was associated with significant lymphoedema of the upper limb, e.g. 4.1(0.7) per cent increase in arm volume at 3 years.

CONCLUSION

A selective policy for the management of the axilla is associated with no increase in axillary recurrence or mortality rate compared with routine axillary node clearance. Patients who are node negative after axillary sample can avoid radiotherapy or axillary clearance.

The reliability of sampling three to six nodes for staging breast cancer

AIMS

To test the hypothesis that a correct qualitative assessment of axillary nodal status can be established by examining only a limited number of lymph nodes.

METHODS

Slides from 499 pN1 or pN0 axillary dissection specimens relating to symptomatic breast cancer cases operated on at our institution between 1991 and 1996 were reviewed. Nodes were ranked in descending order on the basis of their estimated size and lymphoid or metastatic tissue content. After ranking, all nodes were studied microscopically; 265 axillary clearance specimens were positive.

RESULTS

Assessment of the 3-6 largest/firmest nodes can lead to the detection of 93-98% of node positive patients and can give a correct qualitative assessment of axillary node status in 96-99%.

CONCLUSIONS

Sampling the 4-6 largest/firmest nodes seems to be a reliable alternative for the staging of symptomatic breast cancer. These results suggest a reconsideration of the generally held view that a minimum of 10 nodes is required for adequate identification of the pN0 category.

Estimating the overlap between sentinel lymph nodes and axillary node samples in breast cancer

Management of the axilla in breast cancer patients is a controversial issue. Axillary sampling and sentinel lymphadenectomy are both conservative surgical approaches which aim to stage the disease. These procedures target selective treatment of node-positive patients and seem to allow the omission of axillary clearance in node-negative ones. In this way, they reduce the rate of complications in an otherwise overtreated subset of patients. Forty consecutive patients with palpable T1 and T2 breast carcinoma underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy following mapping with Patent blue dye, with subsequent axillary clearance and excision of the tumor or mastectomy. Then the largest/firmest 3,4,5 and 6 nodes were selected from all the lymph nodes in order to model an axillary sample. It was suggested that these are the nodes that are the most likely to be included in the specimen during sampling, because of their size and consistency. The probability of the sentinel lymph nodes falling into the sample of the 3-6 largest/firmest nodes was calculated. The sentinel nodes predicted the axillary nodal status in 95%, while the samples of the largest 3, 4, 5 and 6 nodes were predictive in 95, 96, 98 and 98%, respectively. The two methods of evaluation displayed a considerable overlap, as the sentinel node would have been included in the 3 6 largest/firmest nodes in 79 92% of the cases, depending on the number of largest nodes evaluated. The overlap was greater after fine needle aspiration of the primary tumor. Although the two alternative staging procedures of 3, 4, 5 or 6 node sampling and sentinel lymphadenectomy with the vital blue dye technique cannot be simultaneously done without one influencing the other, and the first method was only modeled, the results suggest that there is a considerable overlap between the two; axillary sampling may often remove the sentinel lymph nodes.

The use of X-ray for lymph node determination in the axillary dissection specimen

A new and simple method by X-ray is described for lymph node determination in the axillary specimen of breast cancer patients. X-rays were performed of the axillary specimens of 49 women with breast cancer. The number of lymph nodes visible on the X-rays were assessed by two radiologists (A and B). The number of nodes identified in the axillary specimens was reported by the pathologist independently. The method described shows a clear correlation between the mean numbers of nodes counted on the X-rays of the specimens (radiologist A 18.3, B 16.1 nodes) and the mean numbers of nodes recovered by the pathologist (18.4). No intra-observer variation was observed and only a small inter-observer variation (2.2 nodes). This method of X-ray determination of lymph nodes can be used in auditing the surgeon's accuracy in performing complete axillary dissection as well as in auditing the number of lymph nodes found by the pathologist.

Endoscopic surgery to the axilla--a substitute for conventional axillary clearance?

Nonpalpable, mammographically detected breast cancers are on the increase. The percentage of patients with histologically involved nodes is therefore decreasing. Axillary clearance aims at reducing the probability of later clinical involvement of the axilla and at establishing a sound basis for adjuvant treatment planning. Minimally invasive techniques have been applied to a growing number of surgical procedures now including exploration of the axilla. The technique used and results achieved in a series of 50 consecutive patients treated by liposuction and axilloscopy by one single surgeon, including all the patients from the very first attempt, are presented here. Patients were excluded with palpable lymph nodes or a primary tumor in the direct vicinity of the axilla that could be injured by the liposuction canula. The average number of lymph nodes removed was 13.4. Thirty-four percent of patients had involved nodes. The mean number of involved nodes in these patients was 3.1. After a median follow-up time of only 15 months no axillary recurrences or trocar site metastases have been found in the first 40 patients. Using a self-assessment questionnaire, the patients rate this technique as excellent. There was no lymphedema. The cosmetic result is certainly better than after conventional axillary clearance. Great experience of laparoscopic surgery and an excellent knowledge of the axillary anatomy are prerequisites for the practice of axilloscopic treatment of the axilla. The working space within the axilla is small and a number of structures need absolutely to be preserved. A longer follow-up period than the one so far achieved in this series or any other in the literature to date is necessary before this technique can be generally recommended.

Sentinel lymphadenectomy: a safe answer to less axillary surgery?

Lymphatic mapping techniques have the potential of changing the standard of surgical care of breast cancer patients. This paper reports a prospective study documenting the safety and efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in 167 breast cancer patients and reviews the world literature on the procedure.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-seven patients with newly diagnosed breast cancers underwent a prospective trial of intra-operative lymphatic mapping using a combination of vital blue dye and filtered technetium-labeled sulfur colloid. A sentinel lymph node (SLN) was defined as a blue node and/or "hot" node with a 10/1 ex-vivo gamma-probe ratio of SLN to non-SLN. All SLN were bi-valved, step-sectioned, and examined with routine H&E stains and immunohistochemical stains for cytokeratin. Cytokeratin-positive SLN were defined as any SLN with a defined cluster of positive staining cells which could be confirmed histologically on H&E sections. Finally, a review of the worldwide data was undertaken using a uniform analytical method to compare the rates of sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, and false negatives of SLN mapping.

RESULTS

In 167 patients, 337 SLN were harvested, for an average of 2.01 SLN/patient. Fifty-two (31.1%) of the patients had metastasis in the SLN. In the 115 patients with negative SLN, 1 was found to have tumor in higher axillary nodes, for a false negative rate of 0.88%. Fifty-nine (37.8%) of the patients were diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration, 89 (53.3%) by excisional biopsy, and 19 (11.4%) by core biopsy. Positive SLN were identified in 1/17 (5.9%) patients with DCIS. Metastasis was found in 33/115 (28.7%) of the patients with infiltrating ductal tumors and in 11/19 (57.9%) of the patients with infiltrating lobular tumors. Positive SLN were identified in 7/16 (43.7%) of the patients with mixed cellularity tumors. Metastasis in the SLN was detected in 7/55 (12.7%) of the 59 patients with T1a-T1b tumors and in 21/58 (36.2%) of the patients with T1c tumors. Positive SLN were found in 17/30 (56.7%) of the patients with T2 tumors and in 6/7 (85.7%) of the patients with T3 tumors. A literature review of 731 patients (including this study) demonstrates a sensitivity rate of 95% and a diagnostic accuracy rate of 98%. The overall false negative rate is 3.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that SLN biopsy is a highly sensitive and accurate method of predicting axillary nodal status. It is a reproducible technique that is easily learned. The future addition of more sensitive methods such as PCR evaluation of nodal involvement may reduce the need for widespread use of adjuvant chemotherapy with its high cost and attendant morbidity and mortality. We believe that this technique will eventually become the standard of care in the treatment of breast cancer, particularly for T1 and T2 lesions and perhaps also for high-grade DCIS tumors.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary staging of T1-T2 N0 breast cancer: a multicenter study

From December 1996 to May 1998, 84 T1-T2 NO breast cancer patients were recruited for a multicenter study on the lymphoscintigraphic search of the axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN). The SLN was searched intraoperatively with a sodium iodide hand-held gamma-detecting probe (GDP) and excised before the standard axillary dissection was performed. Lymphoscintigraphy was unsuccessful in 8 of 84 cases (9.5%). In 73 of 76 patients with positive lymphoscintigraphy, SLN were found and excised (96%). The SLN proved to be predictive of axillary status in 71 of 73 cases (97.2%). Thirty of 41 patients had axillary metastases: in 16 cases, the SLN was the only site of the metastases (50%). In two cases, the SLN (reactive) did not match with the axillary status (2 of 63 reactive SLN, 4.6% of "skip" metastases). Age, tumor diameter, and histology seem to have little importance in affecting the predictivity of SLN biopsy. These results demonstrate the applicability of the lymphatic mapping techniques to a multicenter setting.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a recently developed, minimally invasive technique for staging the axilla in patients with breast cancer. It has been suggested that this technique will avoid the morbidity associated with more extensive axillary dissection. A wide range of different methods and materials has been employed for lymphatic mapping, but there has been little consensus on the most reliable and reproducible technique.

METHODS

This is a comprehensive review of all published literature on sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer, using the Medline and Embase databases and cross-referencing of major articles on the subject.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Sentinel node biopsy is a valid technique in breast cancer management, providing valuable axillary staging information. The optimal technique of lymphatic mapping utilizes a combination of vital blue dye and radiolabelled colloid. However, there remain controversial issues which require to be resolved before sentinel node biopsy becomes a widely accepted part of breast cancer care.

Sentinel node localization in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and identification of the first draining lymph node (the sentinel node) may allow some patients with breast cancer to avoid the morbidity of formal axillary clearance. The aim of this pilot study was to establish the reliability of the technique in predicting axillary node status.

METHODS

Sixty-eight consecutive patients with breast cancer, 38 undergoing mastectomy and 30 wide local excision, were included. Some 2-4 ml of 2.5 per cent Patent Blue dye was injected into adjacent breast tissue on the axillary side of the primary tumour. After 5-10 min, the axilla was explored. Blue-stained lymphatics were dissected to the sentinel node, which was removed for frozen-section examination, followed by routine histology. Formal axillary dissection was then completed.

RESULTS

A sentinel lymph node was identified successfully in 56 (82 per cent) of 68 patients. Histology of the sentinel node accurately predicted axillary node status in 53 (95 per cent). There were three false negatives (5 per cent). In each case, only a single non-sentinel node was tumour positive. Sensitivity and specificity were 83 and 100 per cent respectively.

CONCLUSION

This technique would allow a selective policy of formal axillary dissection in only node-positive patients; however, further experience and refinement are needed.

Association between extent of axillary lymph node dissection and survival in patients with stage I breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of axillary lymph node dissection for stage I (T1N0) breast cancer remains controversial because patients can receive adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of their nodal status and because its therapeutic benefit is in question. The purpose of this study was to determine whether extent of axillary dissection in patients with T1N0 disease is associated with survival.

METHODS

Data from 464 patients with T1N0 breast cancer who underwent axillary dissection from 1973 to 1994 were examined retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence were calculated for patients according to the number of lymph nodes removed (<10 or > or = 10; <15 or > or = 15), and survival curves compared using the Wilcoxon-Gehan statistic. Cox proportional hazards regression modelling was used to adjust for confounding prognostic variables.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 6.4 years. Patient groups were similar in age, menopausal status, tumor size, hormonal receptor status, type of surgery, and adjuvant therapy. There was a statistically significant improvement in disease-free survival in the > or = 10 versus <10 nodal groups (P <.01). Five-year estimates of survival were 75.7% and 86.2% for <10 nodes and > or = 10 nodes, respectively; 10-year estimates were 66.1% and 74.3%. There also was a notable improvement in the survival comparison of patients with <15 versus > or = 15 nodes (P < or = .05). These findings were confirmed in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

These results may reflect a potential for misclassification of tumor stage among patients who had fewer nodes removed. The data, however, suggest that in patients with Stage I breast cancer, improved survival is associated with a more complete axillary lymph node dissection.

The Role of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Management

Although it is generally accepted that axillary dissection provides no survival advantage in patients with breast cancer, it is commonly regarded as a reliable method of assessing nodal status and treating regional disease. However, it is time to consider eliminating routine axillary dissection in patients who are clinically node-negative. A sentinel lymph node biopsy may assess axillary nodal status while obviating a full axillary dissection. At present, axillary dissection remains the standard approach for the surgical management of all patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast, regardless of tumor size or patient age, though it is unnecessary for patients with small intraductal carcinomas.

Diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with breast cancer

The diagnosis of axillary (AX) metastases remains a challenge in the management of breast cancer and is a subject of controversy. Clinical node staging clearly is limited in the assessment of AX lymph nodes. AX mammography, ultrasonography, and computed tomography (CT) do not provide histologic information. Although nuclear magnetic resonance imaging may have considerable value in the diagnosis of AX metastases, it does not detect micrometastases. The use of biologic markers in the assessment of AX metastases remains a subject of investigation. On the other hand, biopsy of selected AX nodes or tissue with examination of histology or cytology generally would not identify a significant percentage of patients with AX node involvement. Sentinel lymph node biopsy, however, might be potentially useful for assessing AX metastases, although it remains investigational. In order to simplify diagnosis and reduce morbidity and mortality, alternatives to AX dissection must be sought and imaging and staging modalities refined. We present a review of the literature pertaining to the diagnosis of AX metastases in patients with breast cancer and a discussion of some current areas of controversy.

Breast-conserving treatment: controversies and consensus

Although breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is an accepted alternative for the treatment of breast cancer, numerous controversies surround the selection criteria and the treatment details. A review of the literature revealed that patient selection is of critical importance. However, there is disagreement over the relative importance of some of the criteria for patient selection. A wide excision is preferable to a less complete excision (tumorectomy) or a more radical excision (quadrantectomy). Accurate assessment of surgical margins is important. The risk of local recurrence may be diminished if a re-excision is performed to obtain tumor-free margins. However, the suitability and practicality of the techniques used to assess the resection margins have been questioned. Radiotherapy is an integral part of BCT. Surgery alone remains an investigational approach. Axillary dissection remains a reliable method of assessing nodal status and treating regional disease.

Predicting axillary lymph node metastases in breast carcinoma patients

Routine axillary dissection is primarily used as a means of assessing prognosis to establish appropriate treatment plans for patients with primary breast carcinoma. However, axillary dissection offers no therapeutic benefit to node negative patients and patients may incur unnecessary morbidity, including mild to severe impairment of arm motion and lymphedema, as a result. This paper outlines a method of evaluating the probability of harbouring lymph node metastases at the time of initial surgery by assessment of tumour based parameters, in order to provide an objective basis for further selection of patients for treatment or investigation. The novel aspect of this study is the use of Maximum Entropy Estimation (MEE) to construct probabilistic models of the relationship between the risk factors and the outcome. Two hundred and seventeen patients with invasive breast carcinoma were studied. Surgical treatment included axillary clearance in all cases, so that the pathologic status of the nodes was known. Tumour size was found to be significantly correlated (P < 0.001) to the axillary lymph node status in the multivariate anlaysis with age (P = 0.089) and vascular invasion (P = 0.08) marginally correlated. Using the multivariate model constructed, 38 patients were predicted to have risk of nodal metastases lower than 20%, of these only 4 (10%) patients had lymph node metastases. A comparison with the Multivariate Logistic Regression (MLR) was carried out. It was found that the predictive quality of the MEE model was better than that of the MLR model. In view of the small sample size, further verification of this model is required in assessing its practical application to a larger population.

Intraoperative assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in operable breast cancer

The diagnostic value of intraoperative histologic examination of frozen sections of axillary lymph nodes was investigated in 243 patients with operable breast cancer. One to six hard or enlarged axillary nodes were sampled from the axillary pad which was derived from a partial axillary dissection (including level 1 and 2 nodes). Half of these nodes were histologically examined using frozen sections during surgery. After a total axillary dissection, both the axillary nodes in the partial axillary dissection and the nodes dissected at level 3 were histologically examined on permanent section. A mean of four nodes were sampled (range: 1 to 6). Axillary dissection yielded a mean of 22 nodes (range: 6 to 60). Axillary sampling detected the presence of metastases in 65 of 84 (77%) patients with positive axillary lymph nodes. In the patients in whom the axillary involvement was not identified by axillary sampling, however, the extent of axillary involvement was limited to levels 1 and 2. Therefore, a partial axillary dissection may be justified for patients in whom axillary involvement is not found on frozen section of nodes from axillary sampling, whereas a total axillary dissection should be performed for patients in whom axillary involvement is found by these procedures.

Axillary lymph nodes and breast cancer: a review

BACKGROUND

The value of surgical staging and treatment of the axillary lymph nodes with either surgery or radiotherapy in the initial management of patients with Stage I or II invasive breast cancer is controversial.

METHODS

A review of retrospective and prospective clinical studies was performed to assess the risks of axillary lymph node involvement and the effectiveness and morbidity of various treatment options.

RESULTS

The risk of axillary lymph node involvement is substantial for most patients, even those with small tumors. The morbidity resulting from a careful Level I/II axillary dissection or moderate-dose axillary radiotherapy is limited. Such treatment is highly effective in preventing axillary recurrence. The symptoms resulting from axillary failure can be controlled in many, but not all, patients. The available data suggest, but do not prove, that the initial use of effective axillary treatment may result in a small improvement in long term outcome in some patient subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients should be treated with either axillary surgery or irradiation. Highly selected subgroups of patients may have such low risks of involvement that specific axillary treatment is of little value. However, such subgroups have not yet been well defined. Treatment approaches that do not involve specific axillary treatment should be considered investigational at present, and the patients should be informed as to their potential risks. Prospective clinical studies of these issues should be pursued.

Intraoperative histologic assessment of surgical margins and lymph node metastasis in breast-conserving surgery

The diagnostic value of intraoperative histologic examination of frozen sections of surgical margins and axillary lymph nodes (AX) was investigated in 95 patients with breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery. The periphery of the excised breast tissue was peeled like an orange and examined histologically by frozen section. The results were compared with examination by permanent section. Evaluation of surgical margins by frozen section resulted in a diagnostic accuracy of 87%, a sensitivity of 96%, and a specificity of 84%. Enlarged or hardened AXs were sampled from the axillary pad which was derived from a complete AX dissection. Histologic examination using frozen section was performed during surgery. After the operation, the remaining AXs were removed from the axillary pad by hand dissection and histologically examined on permanent section. A diagnostic accuracy of 97%, a sensitivity of 77%, and a specificity of 100% were achieved in the diagnosis of AX involvement on frozen section. It was therefore concluded that intraoperative histologic examination of frozen sections may be useful in the determination of involvement of the surgical margins and the AXs in patients with breast cancer.

Conservation surgery for breast cancer: selection criteria and technical considerations

Patients with stage I or II breast cancer are candidates for either modified radical mastectomy or breast preservation therapy involving limited resection of the primary tumor, axillary dissection, and breast irradiation. The overall survival rates of both these approaches are comparable according to retrospective reviews and ongoing clinical trials, and long-term follow-up confirms the earlier findings. Thus, patients should be given the choice between these two options by surgeons, radiation therapists, and other physicians involved in their care. However, not all breast cancer patients will choose breast preservation surgery, and because of tumor-related and other factors not all patients are candidates. The patient selection criteria are discussed herein and the optimal surgical techniques are reviewed.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

The authors report the feasibility and accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymphadenectomy in patients with breast cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer generally is accepted for its staging and prognostic value, but the extent of dissection remains controversial. Blind lymph node sampling or level I dissection may miss some nodal metastases, but ALND may result in lymphedema. In melanoma, intraoperative lymph node mapping with sentinel lymphadenectomy is an effective and minimally invasive alternative to ALND for identifying nodes containing metastases.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-four mapping procedures were performed using a vital dye injected at the primary breast cancer site. Axillary lymphatics were identified and followed to the first ("sentinel") node, which was selectively excised before ALND.

RESULTS

Sentinel nodes were identified in 114 of 174 (65.5%) procedures and accurately predicted axillary nodal status in 109 of 114 (95.6%) cases. There was a definite learning curve, and all false-negative sentinel nodes occurred in the first part of the study; sentinel nodes identified in the last 87 procedures were 100% predictive. In 16 of 42 (38.0%) clinically negative/pathologically positive axillae, the sentinel node was the only tumor-involved lymph node identified. The anatomic location of the sentinel node was examined in the 54 most recent procedures; ten cases had only level II nodal metastases that could have been missed by sampling or low (level I) axillary dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

This experience indicates that intraoperative lymphatic mapping can accurately identify the sentinel node--i.e., the axillary lymph node most likely to contain breast cancer metastases--in some patients. The technique could enhance staging accuracy and, with further refinements and experience, might alter the role of ALND.