Stapled ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis without a temporary diverting ileostomy

Perfusion Visualization during Ileal J-Pouch Formation—A Proposal for the Standardization of Intraoperative Imaging with Indocyanine Green Near-Infrared Fluorescence and a Postoperative Follow-Up in IBD Surgery

Background: An anastomotic leak (AL) after a restorative proctocolectomy and an ileal J-pouch increases morbidity and the risk of pouch failure. Thus, a perfusion assessment during J-pouch formation is crucial. While indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescence (ICG-NIRF) has shown potential to reduce ALs, its suitability in a restorative proctocolectomy remains unclear. We aimed to develop a standardized approach for investigating ICG-NIRF and ALs in pouch surgery. Methods: Patients undergoing a restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal J-pouch for ulcerative colitis at an IBD-referral-center were included in a prospective study in which an AL within 30 postoperative days was the primary outcome. Intraoperatively, standardized perfusion visualization with ICG-NIRF was performed and video recorded for postoperative analysis at three time points. Quantitative clinical and technical variables (secondary outcome) were correlated with the primary outcome by descriptive analysis and logistic regression. A novel definition and grading of AL of the J-pouch was applied. A postoperative pouchoscopy was routinely performed to screen for AL. Results: Intraoperative ICG-NIRF-visualization and its postoperative visual analysis in 25 patients did not indicate an AL. The anastomotic site after pouch formation appeared completely fluorescent with a strong fluorescence signal (category 2) in all cases of ALs (4 of 25). Anastomotic site was not changed. ICG-NIRF visualization was reproducible and standardized. Logistic regression identified a two-stage approach vs. a three-stage approach (Odds ratio (OR) = 20.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.37–580.18, p = 0.029) as a risk factor for ALs. Conclusion: We present a standardized, comparable approach of ICG-NIRF visualization in pouch surgery. Our data indicate that the visual interpretation of ICG-NIRF alone may not detect ALs of the pouch in all cases—quantifiable, objective methods of interpretation may be required in the future.

Postoperative complications, bowel function, and prognosis in restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis-a single-center observational study of 320 patients

PURPOSE

To determine the selection criteria, postoperative complications, bowel function, and prognosis of stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and hand-sewn IPAA for ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

We defined our surgical indications and strategy, and compared the postoperative complications, bowel function, and prognoses between patients who underwent stapled and hand-sewn IPAA for UC at the Yokohama City University Medical Center between 2004 and 2017.

RESULTS

Among 320 patients enrolled, 298 patients underwent stapled IPAA while 22 underwent hand-sewn IPAA. There was no significant difference in the postoperative complications between the two groups. Regarding postoperative bowel function, stapled IPAA caused significantly less soiling (stapled vs hand-sewn: 9.1% vs 41.0%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.14, p < 0.0002), spotting (stapled vs hand-sewn: 23.2% vs 63.6%, OR = 0.17, p < 0.0001), and difficulty in distinguishing feces from flatus (stapled vs hand-sewn: 39.9% vs 63.6%, OR = 0.36, p < 0.026). No postoperative neoplasia was observed at the final follow-up in all patients.

CONCLUSION

In this study, there was no clear difference in the postoperative complications between stapled and hand-sewn IPAA, but stapled IPAA resulted in better postoperative bowel function. Postoperative oncogenesis from the residual mucosa is rare. However, future cancer risk remains; thus, careful follow-up is required.

Single-stage restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis in pediatric patients: a safe alternative

BACKGROUND

Surgical management for refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) has been restorative proctocolectomy (RP) with ileal-pouch-anal-anastomosis (IPAA) done as one to three stages, with safety and effectiveness of a single-stage operation unclear.

METHODS

Pediatric UC patients from 2004 to 2019 who underwent RP/IPAA in the initial operation were retrospectively reviewed. 1-stage operations were matched 1:2 to 2-stage operations using age, duration of disease, and disease severity.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients (33 1-stage, 66 2-stage) were identified. The median total operative time was shorter in the 1-stage group (6 h:00 min vs. 7 h:47 min, p = 0.004). Total length of stay was shorter in the 1-stage group (9 vs. 17 days, p = 0.001). Rates of readmission were higher in 2-stage group (30 vs. 9%, p = 0.02). There was no difference in pouch leak rates (p = 1.00). Stricture rates were higher in the 2-stage group (50 vs. 16%, p = 0.005). Functional outcomes including pouchitis (p = 0.13), daily bowel movements (p = 0.37), and incontinence (p = 0.77) were all similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA in children with UC can be performed as a 1- or 2-stage operation with equivalent short-term, long-term, and functional outcomes in similar risk population. Our findings suggest 1-stage RP/IPAA operations without ileostomy are a safe alternative for patients considered for a 2-stage operation.

Outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis patients: experience during a 27-year period

BACKGROUND

No previous study describes the postoperative outcome and functional results after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), performed in ulcerative colitis by the same surgical team with the different anastomotic techniques adopted in a 27-year period.

METHODS

Prospectively, consecutive 333 ulcerative colitis patients operated adopting different IPAA techniques during the open surgery period 1984-2011 were enrolled. IPAA was performed using single stapling (SS) technique in 38 patients, double stapling (DS) technique in 235 patients (TIA stapler 42 patients, Endo-GIA 131 patients, Contour 62 patients) and handsewn IPAA in 60 patients.

RESULTS

Statistically different early and late complications were recorded among the different IPAA techniques. A lower frequency of daily and nocturnal defecations and a higher level of continence were observed in the DS-IPAA compared to handsewn IPAA. The distance between the anastomotic line and the anal verge was significantly lower in DS Endo-GIA or DS Contour groups than in the DS TIA and SS. In SS IPAA group, 31.6% developed cuffitis compared to 14.4% belonging to DS group, at a mean follow-up of 140.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Technical improvements changed the IPAA technique. Stapled IPAA is characterized by better functional outcome than handsewn IPAA. DS Endo-GIA and Contour IPAA are followed by lower risk of cuffitis.

Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes in 588 patients undergoing minimally invasive ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single-institution experience

PURPOSE

A laparoscopic approach to proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis has grown in popularity secondary to reports of small series demonstrating short-term patient benefits. Limited data exist in large numbers of patients undergoing laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (L-IPAA). We aimed to analyze surgical outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing L-IPAA.

METHODS

From a prospectively maintained surgical database, 30-day surgical outcome data were reviewed for all L-IPAA performed for chronic ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis from 1999 to 2012. Demographics, operative approach, and operative and postoperative complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 588 L-IPAA ileal pouch-anal anastomoses were performed predominantly for chronic ulcerative colitis (93.9 %). The mean age was 36.2 years, and 54.3 % were male, with a mean BMI of 24.1 kg/m(2). Three-stage operations were performed in 17.7 %. The mean operating time of the patients excluding 3-stage operation was 269.4 min. Minimally invasive techniques included hand-assist in 55 % and straight laparoscopy in 45 %. Conversion to open occurred in 8.8 %. Median length of stay was 5 days. There was no mortality. Complications occurred in 36.9 % of patients: Clavien grade I (17.5 %), grade II (72.8 %), and grade III (9.7 %). Analysis of the grouped data over time demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in operative time (p < 0.001) and an increase in the ratio of hand-assisted over straight laparoscopy (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive IPAA performed using either a laparoscopic or hand-assisted technique is safe, can be performed with low conversion rates, and confers beneficial perioperative outcomes.

Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

The aims of this study are to compare the 30-day rate of bowel obstruction for stapled vs. handsewn closure of loop ileostomy, and to further assess efficacy and safety for each technique by secondary endpoints such as operative time, rates of anastomotic leakage, and other post-operative complications within 30 days.

METHODS

A systematic literature search (MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing stapled and handsewn closure of loop ileostomy after low anterior resection. Random effects meta-analyses were calculated and presented as risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Forty publications were retrieved and 4 RCTs (649 patients) were included. There was methodological and clinical heterogeneity of included trials, but statistical heterogeneity was low for most endpoints. Stapler use significantly reduced the rate of bowel obstruction compared to hand-sewn closure (RR 0.53 [0.32, 0.88]; P = 0.01). The operation time was significantly lower for stapling compared to hand suture (MD -15.5 min [-18.4, 12.6]; P < 0.001). All other secondary outcomes did not show significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis shows superiority of stapled closure of loop ileostomy compared to handsewn closure in terms of bowel obstruction rate and mean operation time. Other relevant complications such as anastomotic leakage are equivalent. Even so, both techniques are options with opposing advantages and disadvantages.

Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Temporary loop ileostomy is a routine procedure to reduce the morbidity of restorative proctocolectomy. However, morbidity of ileostomy closure could reduce the benefit of this concept. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the risks of ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Publications in English or German language reporting morbidity of ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy were identified by Medline search. Two hundred thirty-two publications were screened, 143 were assessed in full-text, and finally 26 studies (reporting 2146 ileostomy closures) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Weighted means for overall morbidity and mortality of ileostomy closure, rate of redo operations, anastomotic dehiscence, bowel obstruction, wound infection, and late complications were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall morbidity of ileostomy closure was 16.5 %, there was no mortality. Redo operations for complications were necessary in 3.0 %. Anastomotic dehiscence occurred in 2.0 %. Postoperative bowel obstruction developed in 7.6 %, with 2.9 % of patients requiring laparotomy for this complication. Wound infection rate was 4.0 %. Hernia or bowel obstruction as late complications developed in 1.9 and 9.4 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The considerable morbidity of ileostomy reversal reduces the overall benefit of temporary fecal diversion. However, ileostomy creation is still recommended, as it effectively reduces the risk of pouch-related septic complications.

In a select group of patients meeting strict clinical criteria and undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, the omission of a diverting ileostomy offers cost savings to the hospital

PURPOSE

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the standard care for the majority of patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis requiring surgery. The aim of this study is to determine whether the omission of an ileostomy in patients undergoing ileal pouch surgery offers cost savings to the hospital.

METHODS

Patients who underwent open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis between 2000 and 2007 were identified. They were grouped according to the absence or presence of an ileostomy at the time of their surgery. Direct costs were calculated from the hospital's accounting database. Costs analyzed included those from the index surgery, ileostomy closure, and 6-month complications.

RESULTS

Cost data were available for 835 patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Seven hundred fifteen (86%) had a diverting ileostomy, and the ileostomy was omitted in 120 (14%). Patients without an ileostomy had a longer length of stay (8.7 vs 6.0 days; P < .001) and a 15% greater cost (P < .001) at the time of index surgery than did those with an ileostomy. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in costs related to complications. The total costs, including ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, ileostomy closure, and complications, were 25% greater in the ileostomy group than in the group who had the ileostomy omitted at the index surgery ($9176 (+/- 6559) vs $11,451 (+/- 8791); P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The above data shows that in a select group of patients meeting well-defined clinical criteria, the omission of a diverting ileostomy will provide significant cost savings for the hospital.

Laparoscopic versus open proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis

In recent years laparoscopic proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has been used as an alternative to conventional open techniques. Since many published series on proctectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis are based on open experience, in this paper we compare our laparoscopic experience on 21 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) to 25 patients who had undergone open proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The median operative time in the laparoscopic group was significantly longer than that in the open group (325 min vs. 220 min). However, blood loss was less (115 ml vs.240 ml), bowel function returned earlier (2 days vs.4 days), and hospitalization time was shorter (9 days vs.11 days) in the laparoscopic group (all p<0.05). Early postoperative complications were encountered in five patients of the laparoscopic group and in seven patients of the open group. The median follow-up time was 15 months (range 6-34) in both groups. Late postoperative complications were encountered in three patients of the laparoscopic group and in three patients of the open group. In conclusion, laparoscopic proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is technically feasible. The technique described in this study provides the advantages of less blood loss, shorter hospitalization, quicker return of bowel function and more favorable cosmetic results when compared to the open technique.

Ileal pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a relapsing and remitting disease characterised by chronic mucosal and submucosal inflammation of the colon and rectum. Treatment may vary depending upon the extent and severity of inflammation. Broadly speaking medical treatments aim to induce and then maintain remission. Surgery is indicated for inflammatory disease that is refractory to medical treatment or in cases of neoplastic transformation. Approximately 25% of patients with UC ultimately require colectomy. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the standard of care for patients with ulcerative colitis who ultimately require colectomy. This review will examine indications for IPAA, patient selection, technical aspects of surgery, management of complications and long term outcome following this procedure.

Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited

Since restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) removes the entire diseased mucosa, it has become firmly established as the standard operative procedure of choice for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Many technical controversies still persist, such as mesenteric lengthening techniques, close rectal wall proctectomy, endoanal mucosectomy vs. double stapled anastomosis, loop ileostomy omission and a laparoscopic approach. Despite the complexity of the operation, IPAA is safe (mortality: 0.5-1%), it carries an acceptable risk of non-life-threatening complications (10-25%), and it achieves good long-term functional outcome with excellent patient satisfaction (over 95%). In contrast to the high incidence in patients operated for ulcerative colitis (UC) (15-20%), the occurrence of pouchitis after IPAA seems to be rare in FAP patients (0-11%). Even after IPAA, FAP patients are still at risk of developing adenomas (and occasional adenocarcinomas), either in the anal canal (10-31%) or in the ileal pouch itself (8-62%), thus requiring lifelong endoscopic monitoring. IPAA operation does not jeopardise pregnancy and childbirth, but it does impair female fecundity and has a low risk of impairment of erection and ejaculation in young males. The latter can almost completely be avoided by a careful "close rectal wall" proctectomy technique. Some argue that low risk patients (e.g. <5 rectal polyps) can be identified where ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) might be reasonable. We feel that the risk of rectal cancer after IRA means that IPAA should be recommended for the vast majority of FAP patients. We accept that in some very selected cases, based on clinical and genetics data (and perhaps influenced by patient choice regarding female fecundity), a stepwise surgical strategy with a primary IPA followed at a later age by a secondary proctectomy with IPAA could be proposed.

Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience

OBJECTIVE

To compare safety and short-term outcomes of 100 laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) versus 200 conventional open IPAA patients.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Outcomes of laparoscopic IPAA (LAP-IPAA) have been incompletely characterized. Previous reports are characterized by small numbers of patients and rarely include case-matched or randomized trial methodology. This report describes 100 LAP-IPAA patients case matched to 200 open IPAA patients.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2004, 100 consecutive LAP-IPAA patients (75 laparoscopic assisted, 25 hand assisted) were identified and case matched to 200 open IPAA control patients by age, operation, gender, date of operation, and body mass index. Operative and postoperative outcomes at 90 days were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients (180 female) with a median age of 32 years (range, 17-66 years), and a median body mass index of 23 kg/m (range, 16-34 kg/m) underwent IPAA (100 LAP-IPAA, 200 open IPAA). Diagnosis (chronic ulcerative colitis 97%, familial adenomatous polyposis 3%) and previous operative history were equivalent between groups. One intraoperative complication occurred in each group. Overall, the laparoscopic conversion rate was 6%. Median operative time was longer for the LAP-IPAA group (333 minutes versus 230 minutes, P < 0.0001). LAP-IPAA patients had shorter median time to regular diet (3 versus 5 days), time to ileostomy output (2 versus 3 days), length of stay (4 versus 7 days), and decreased IV narcotic use (all P < 0.05. Postoperative morbidity was equivalent (LAP-IPAA = 33%, open IPAA = 37%), mortality was nil, and readmission rates were equal (LAP-IPAA = 21%, open IPAA = 22%). Reoperation was required in 3% of LAP-IPAA and 6.5% of open IPAA patients (P < 0.2) during the first 3 months.

CONCLUSION

LAP-IPAA is equivalent to open IPAA in terms of safety and feasibility. In addition, LAP-IPAA provides significant improvements in short-term recovery outcomes.

Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience

OBJECTIVE

To compare safety and short-term outcomes of 100 laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) versus 200 conventional open IPAA patients.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Outcomes of laparoscopic IPAA (LAP-IPAA) have been incompletely characterized. Previous reports are characterized by small numbers of patients and rarely include case-matched or randomized trial methodology. This report describes 100 LAP-IPAA patients case matched to 200 open IPAA patients.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2004, 100 consecutive LAP-IPAA patients (75 laparoscopic assisted, 25 hand assisted) were identified and case matched to 200 open IPAA control patients by age, operation, gender, date of operation, and body mass index. Operative and postoperative outcomes at 90 days were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients (180 female) with a median age of 32 years (range, 17-66 years), and a median body mass index of 23 kg/m (range, 16-34 kg/m) underwent IPAA (100 LAP-IPAA, 200 open IPAA). Diagnosis (chronic ulcerative colitis 97%, familial adenomatous polyposis 3%) and previous operative history were equivalent between groups. One intraoperative complication occurred in each group. Overall, the laparoscopic conversion rate was 6%. Median operative time was longer for the LAP-IPAA group (333 minutes versus 230 minutes, P < 0.0001). LAP-IPAA patients had shorter median time to regular diet (3 versus 5 days), time to ileostomy output (2 versus 3 days), length of stay (4 versus 7 days), and decreased IV narcotic use (all P < 0.05. Postoperative morbidity was equivalent (LAP-IPAA = 33%, open IPAA = 37%), mortality was nil, and readmission rates were equal (LAP-IPAA = 21%, open IPAA = 22%). Reoperation was required in 3% of LAP-IPAA and 6.5% of open IPAA patients (P < 0.2) during the first 3 months.

CONCLUSION

LAP-IPAA is equivalent to open IPAA in terms of safety and feasibility. In addition, LAP-IPAA provides significant improvements in short-term recovery outcomes.

Ileostomy rod--is it a bridge too far?

OBJECTIVE

Defunctioning loop ileostomies are used commonly to protect low colorectal anastomoses and thereby reducing the serious complications of leakage. However, they are associated with specific complications such as retraction. Traditionally, a supporting rod is placed as a bridge to support both limbs of the stoma in the hope of reducing the incidence of stomal retraction. There is little evidence in the published literature to support this practice. The aim of this study was to determine whether using an ileostomy rod would reduce the incidence of stomal retraction.

METHOD

A prospective, randomised controlled trial was performed in 60 consecutive patients who required a defunctioning loop ileostomy. Patients were allocated to either a 'bridge' or 'bridge-less' protocol. All the patients were assessed by dedicated stoma nurses for at least 3 months and until their stomas were closed. Their postoperative symptoms, including stoma activity and retraction rate, were recorded.

RESULTS

Between May 2001 and June 2004, 57 patients completed the study (28 bridge; 29 bridge-less). There were no significant differences in the retraction rate between the groups. No clinical anastomotic leakage was recorded and none of the patients required early closure.

CONCLUSIONS

If a loop ileostomy is constructed properly, stomal retraction is uncommon and routine use of a bridge is unnecessary.

The outcome after restorative proctocolectomy with or without defunctioning ileostomy

PURPOSE

Controversy exists regarding the safety for omission of diverting ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy because of fears of increased septic complications. This study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy in a consecutive series of patients by comparing postoperative complications, functional results, and quality of life in patients with and without diverting ileostomy.

METHODS

Data regarding demographics, length of stay, surgical characteristics, and complications were reviewed and recorded according to the presence (n= 1,725) or absence (n = 277) of a diverting ileostomy at the time of pelvic pouch surgery. Criteria for omission of ileostomy included: stapled anastomosis, tension-free anastomosis, intact tissue rings, good hemostasis, absence of airleaks, malnutrition, toxicity, anemia, and prolonged consumption of steroids. Functional outcome and quality of life indicators were prospectively recorded and compared.

RESULTS

Patients in the ileostomy group had greater body surface area and older mean age at time of surgery, were taking greater doses of steroids preoperatively, and required more blood transfusions at the time of surgery compared with the one-stage (P < 0.05). There were no differences between the two groups in septic complications (P > 0.05). Early postoperative ileus was more common in the one-stage group (P < 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in quality of life and functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

For carefully selected patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, omission of diverting ileostomy is a safe procedure that does not lead to an increase in septic complications or mortality. Quality of life and functional results are similar to those who undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with diversion, provided that certain selection factors are considered.

Revolution and evolution: 30 years of ileoanal pouch surgery

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the standard of care for the 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis who ultimately require colectomy. IPAA is favored by patients because it avoids the necessity for a long-term stoma. This review examines how 3 decades of experience with IPAA has molded current practice, highlighting 5- and 10-year follow-up of large series to determine durability and functional performance, in addition to causes of failure and the management of complications.

The relevance of gastrointestinal fistulae in clinical practice: a review

Gastrointestinal fistulae most frequently occur as complications after abdominal surgery (75-85%) although they can also occur spontaneously--for example, in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) such as diverticulitis or following radiation therapy. Abdominal trauma can also lead to fistula formation although this is rare. Postoperative gastrointestinal fistulae can occur after any abdominal procedure in which the gastrointestinal tract is manipulated. Regardless of the cause, leakage of intestinal juices initiates a cascade of events: localised infection, abscess formation and, as a result of a septic focus, fistulae formation. The nature of the underlying disease may also be important, with some studies showing that fistula formation is more frequent following surgery for cancer than for benign disease. Fistula formation can result in a number of serious or debilitating complications, ranging from disturbance of fluid and electrolyte balance to sepsis and even death. The patient will almost always suffer from severe discomfort and pain. They may also have psychological problems, including anxiety over the course of their disease, and a poor body image due to the malodorous drainage fluid. Postoperative fistula formation often results in prolonged hospitalisation, patient disability, and enormous cost. Therapy has improved over time with the introduction of parental nutrition, intensive postoperative care, and advanced surgical techniques, which has reduced mortality rates. However, the number of patients suffering from gastrointestinal fistulae has not declined substantially. This can partially be explained by the fact that with improved care, more complex surgery is being performed on patients with more advanced or complicated disease who are generally at higher risk. Therefore, gastrointestinal fistulae remain an important complication following gastrointestinal surgery.

One- or two-stage procedure for restorative proctocolectomy: rationale for a surgical strategy in ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the results of different strategies for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in ulcerative colitis.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

No commonly accepted criteria exist for choosing between the one-stage or the two-stage procedure (with or without temporary diverting ileostomy) for IPAA. The authors analyzed the outcome of patients principally suitable for either of the two alternative surgical strategies.

METHODS

A matched-pair control study was performed, comparing surgical details and the early and late outcome of the one-stage (study group, n = 57) versus the two-stage procedure (control group, n = 114), for IPAA.

RESULTS

No differences were found between the study group and the control group regarding the matching criteria gender, median age at IPAA, systemic corticoid medication, or activity of colitis. Comparing the patients who underwent a one-stage procedure with those who underwent a two-stage procedure, the proportion of patients without complications was significantly higher (P =.0042) and the frequency of late complications was significantly lower (P =.0022) in patients who underwent the one-stage procedure. The percentage of patients with anastomotic strictures was significantly higher in the control group than in the study group (P =.0022). No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding early complications, pouch-related septic complications, pouchitis, median duration of surgery for IPAA, median blood loss, need for transfusion, or median hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ulcerative colitis in whom there is a choice between a one-stage procedure or a two-stage procedure with a defunctioning ileostomy, the one-stage procedure is clearly superior. This finding is of great clinical relevance both for the subjective interests of the patient and from an economic point of view.

Functional outcome of stapled ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis versus handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis

This study was conducted to determine whether stapled ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis (IACA) preserving the anal transitional zone (ATZ) or hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with mucosectomy (IPAA) is more beneficial in achieving disease eradication and better postoperative function. IACA was performed in 10 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 10 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), 15 of whom were examined proctoscopically. IPAA was performed in 4 patients with UC and 8 patients with FAP. The mean maximum resting pressure (MRP) was 55 mmHg in the IACA group and 34 mmHg in the IPAA group (P < 0.01). The anorectal inhibitory reflex was positive in 18 patients (90%) from the IACA group and 5 (42%) from the IPAA group (P < 0.05). The pre- and postoperative MRPs were 61 mmHg and 55 mmHg, respectively, in the IACA group vs 63 mmHg and 34 mmHg, respectively, in the IPAA group (P < 0.01). Whereas 16 (80%) of the 20 IACA patients could discriminate feces from gas, only 4 (33%) of the 12 IPAA patients could (P < 0.05). The mean observation period was 2.3 years, the mean length of the columnar cuff was 2.8 cm, and no case of dysplasia or adenoma was seen. Postoperative function is more favorable following IACA than following IPAA, both physiologically and symptomatically. However, long-term surveillance of the residual mucosa is necessary before making a final recommendation.

Incidence and natural history of dysplasia of the anal transitional zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: results of a five-year to ten-year follow-up

PURPOSE

Preservation of the anal transitional zone during ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is still controversial because of the risk of dysplasia and the theoretical risk of associated cancer. Without long-term follow-up data, the natural history and optimal treatment of anal transitional zone dysplasia are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term risk of dysplasia in the anal transitional zone and to evaluate the outcome of a conservative management policy for anal transitional zone dysplasia.

METHODS

Two hundred ten patients undergoing anal transitional zone-sparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative or indeterminate colitis between 1987 and 1992 and who were studied with serial anal transitional zone biopsies for at least five years postoperatively were included. Median follow up was 77 (range, 60-124) months.

RESULTS

Anal transitional zone dysplasia developed in seven patients 4 to 51 (median, 11) months postoperatively. There was no association with gender, age, preoperative disease duration or extent of colitis, but the risk of anal transitional zone dysplasia was significantly increased in patients with prior cancer or dysplasia in the colon or rectum. Dysplasia was high grade in one and low grade in six. Two patients each with low-grade dysplasia detected on three separate occasions underwent mucosectomy 29 and 38 months after detection of low-grade dysplasia, but no cancer was found. The five other patients with dysplasia on one or two occasions were treated expectantly and were apparently dysplasia-free for a median of 72 (range, 48-100) months.

CONCLUSIONS

Anal transitional zone dysplasia after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is infrequent, is most common in the first two to three years postoperatively and may apparently disappear on repeated biopsy. Anal transitional zone preservation did not lead to the development of cancer in the anal transitional zone after five to ten years of follow-up. Long-term surveillance is recommended to monitor dysplasia. If repeat biopsy confirms persistent dysplasia, anal transitional zone excision with neoileal pouch-anal anastomosis is recommended.

Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate continued experience with a one-stage stapled ileoanal pouch procedure without temporary ileostomy diversion.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Most centers perform colectomy, proctectomy, and ileal pouch anal anastomoses (IPAA) with a protective ileostomy. Following a previous report, the authors performed 126 additional stapled IPAA procedures for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis, of which all but 2 were without an ileostomy. Outcomes in these patients question the need for temporary ileal diversion, with its complications and need for subsequent surgical closure.

METHODS

Two hundred one patients underwent a stapled IPAA since May 1989, 192 as a one-stage procedure without ileostomy, and 1 with a concurrent Whipple procedure for duodenal adenocarcinoma. Patient charts were reviewed or patients were contacted by phone to evaluate their clinical status at least 1 year after their surgery.

RESULTS

Among the patients who underwent the one-stage procedure, 178 had ulcerative colitis (38 fulminant), 5 had Crohn's disease (diagnosed after IPAA), 1 had indeterminate colitis, and 8 had familial adenomatous polyposis. The mean age was 38 +/- 7 (range 7--70) years; there were 98 male patients and 94 female patients. The average amount of diseased tissue between the dentate line and the anastomosis was 0.9 +/- 0.1 cm, with 35% of the anastomoses at the dentate line. With 89% follow-up at 1 year or more (mean 5.1 +/- 2.4 years) after surgery, the average 24-hour stool frequency was 7.1 +/- 3.3, of which 0.9 +/- 1.4 were at night. Daytime stool control was 95% and night-time control was 90%. Only 2.3% needed to wear a perineal pad. Average length of hospital stay was 10 +/- 0.3 days, with 1.5 +/- 0.5 days readmission for complications. Abscesses or enteric leaks occurred in 23 patients; IPAA function was excellent in 19 of these patients (2 have permanent ileostomies). In patients taking steroids, there was no significant difference in leak rate with duration of use (29 +/- 8 with vs. 22 +/- 2 months without leak) or dose (32 +/- 13 mg with vs. 35 +/- 3 mg without leak). Two (1%) patients died (myocardial infarction, mesenteric infarction).

CONCLUSIONS

The triple-stapled IPAA without temporary ileal diversion has a relatively low complication rate and a low rate of small bowel obstruction, provides excellent fecal control, permits an early return to a functional life, and can be performed in morbidly obese and older patients.

Does technique of anastomosis play any role in developing late perianal abscess or fistula?

PURPOSE

This study examines the risk factors for developing perianal abscess or fistula formation after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedure for chronic ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis.

METHODS

A total of 1,457 patients with J-pouch, 1,304 (89.5 percent) with chronic ulcerative colitis and 153 (10.5 percent) with familial adenomatous polyposis who had a two-stage procedure without any evidence of previous perianal disease were included in the study. The effect of pouch-to-anal anastomosis type on perianal abscess or fistula formation was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients (7.4 percent) had a perianal abscess or fistula after the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedure after at least one year of follow-up. No statistically significant difference was identified in fistula formation regarding the age and gender of the patients (P > 0.05), nor did the risk of fistula formation differ significantly between the patients with handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses (P > 0.05). However, patients with a diagnosis of chronic ulcerative colitis, compared with patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, had a statistically higher risk of developing abscess or fistula (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

The most important risk factor in developing perianal sepsis in long-term patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the initial disease type. After excluding patients without Crohn's disease, the risk of developing an abscess or fistula was found to be significantly greater in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis compared with patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, and this risk is independent of anastomotic technique.

Retocolectomia total e anastomose íleo-anal com reservatório ileal: experiência de 16 anos

O reservatório ileal pélvico tem sido a melhor opção cirúrgica para a retocolite ulcerativa (RCU) e polipose adenomatosa familiar (PAF). Desde 1983 esta técnica vem sendo empregada, e o objetivo deste trabalho é apresentar revisão desta casuística, analisando seus resultados e seus pontos controversos. Setenta e três pacientes, com média de idade de 34,6 (13-63) anos e com predomínio do sexo feminino (42 pacientes, 56,7%) se submeteram ao procedimento para tratamento de RCU (46 pacientes - 63,0%) e PAF(27 - 37,0%). Foram utilizadas as seguintes variantes técnicas: em S, de grande tamanho e ramo eferente longo (oito); em S pequeno e ramo eferente reduzido (22); em "dupla câmara" (20); em J (23). Todos os procedimentos foram seguidos da construção de ileostomia de proteção. De 1993 em diante, todos os pacientes tiveram a arcada do colo direito preservada. Setenta pacientes têm pelo menos um ano de pós-operatório e 61 têm dois anos ou mais com média de 7,01 (1-16) anos. Foram consideradas complicações precoces aquelas que ocorreram até o 30º dia de pós- operatório e tardias, após esse tempo. Resultados funcionais foram analisados após um ano do fechamento da ileostomia. Ocorreram 35 complicações precoces em 22 pacientes e 39 complicações tardias em 35 pacientes. Vinte e cinco pacientes não apresentaram complicações. As principais complicações foram: obstrução intestinal (19,1 %), fistulizações cutâneas, com vagina ou trato urinário (10,9%), isquemia de reservatório (parcial ou total), (9,5%), e ileíte do reservatório (pouchitis) (6,8%). Nove pacientes (12,3%) têm ileostomia funcionante, sendo que sete pacientes têm ainda o reservatório mantido no lugar e dois tiveram-no ressecado. A mortalidade diretamente relacionada ao procedimento foi em dois pacientes, mas outros quatro pacientes evoluíram tardiamente ao óbito, por causas como desnutrição crônica e tumor de cerebelo. Em conclusão, apesar da morbidade e da existência ainda de questões controversas, as perspectivas tardias têm sido animadoras e têm estimulado a indicação deste tipo de procedimento.

Surgical therapy for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease

Over the past 2 decades there has been considerable progress in the surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease. Crohn's disease is a chronic, nonspecific inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract of unknown cause. It involves mainly the ileum, colon, and rectum, most often producing symptoms of obstruction or localized perforation with fistula. Although surgical treatment is palliative, operative excision in combination with strictureplasty, where appropriate, provides effective symptomatic relief and reasonable long-term benefit. Chronic ulcerative colitis is a diffuse inflammatory disease of the mucosal lining of the colon and rectum. Total removal of the colon and rectum provides a complete cure. Newer surgical alternatives, developed over the last 2 decades, have eliminated the need for a permanent ileostomy following definitive resection of the involved colon and rectum.

Restorative proctocolectomy in children with ulcerative colitis utilizing rectal mucosectomy with or without diverting ileostomy

BACKGROUND

Controversies continue concerning the best way to perform restorative proctectomy (RP) for ulcerative colitis (UC). Can rectal mucosectomy and hand-sewn ileoanal anastomosis (IAA) withstand the challenge posed by extrarectal dissection with a double-stapled technique and no mucosectomy? Is a diverting ileostomy mandatory after RP?

METHODS

The authors describe 30 consecutive children with UC who underwent RP with rectal mucosectomy and hand-sewn IAA. The authors assess the results and compare the first 14 patients (group 1) treated with temporary diverting ileostomies with the next 16 consecutive patients (group 2) without diverting ileostomies.

RESULTS

The average age (13.8 years in group 1 v 10.4 in group 2), duration of illness before resection (3.2 years in group 1 v 1.5 in group 2), and gender breakdown (10 of 14 were girls in group 1, 10 of 16 were girls in group 2) were similar between the two groups. Outcome was not significantly different between the two groups. Average bowel movements per 24-hour period was 5.5 in group 1 and 4.2 in Group 2. Occasional nighttime staining occurred in two patients in group 1 and five in group 2. No one suffered daytime staining in group 1, and one patient had occasional daytime staining in group 2. Average quality of life (on a scale of 0 to 5) as assessed by the patients or parents was 4.4 in group 1 and 4.9 in group 2. There were 10 total complications in group 1. One child required a permanent stoma for ileoanal separation. Two patients required reoperations for complications caused by the diverting ileostomy. The single instance of peritonitis was in group 1 caused by anastomotic leak after ileostomy closure. There were five total complications in group 2, of which, two required temporary stomas for ileoanal separations.

CONCLUSIONS

RP with rectal mucosectomy and hand-sewn IAA in children with UC provides good functional results. Peritonitis did not occur in the absence of diversion. Eliminating routine diverting ileostomy avoids the considerable complications and morbidity from the stoma and its closure.

Incidence and subsequent impact of pelvic abscess after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis

PURPOSE

This study was designed to measure the impact of pelvic abscess on eventual pouch failure and functional outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The outcome of 1,508 patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis at the Mayo Clinic was determined from a central patient registry, data were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients developed a pelvic abscess as a complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Pouch failure occurred in 19 (26 percent). Forty-eight patients (55 percent) required transabdominal salvage surgery, 6 (8 percent) underwent local surgery, and the remaining 27 (37 percent) were treated nonsurgically. Wound infection was more common in patients who experienced pelvic abscess. The majority of pouch failures secondary to pelvic abscess formation occurred within two years of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Daytime incontinence, the use of a protective pad, and the need for constipating or bulking medication were significantly more common among patients who had an abscess but kept their reservoir. Ability to perform work and domestic activities and to undertake recreational activities were significantly more restricted among these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pouch failure occurs in one-fourth of patients who retain their pouch despite pelvic abscess after ileal pouch-anal anasto mosis. Among patients who retain their pouch despite postoperative pelvic abscess, functional outcome and quality of life are significantly poorer than in patients in whom no sepsis occurred.

J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patients

AIM

The purpose of the study was to determine the risk of postoperative complications and the functional outcome after a hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis using a single J-shaped pouch design.

METHODS

Preoperative function, operative morbidity and long-term functional outcome were assessed prospectively in 1310 patients who underwent IPAA between 1981 and 1994 for ulcerative colitis.

RESULTS

Three patients died after operation. Postoperative pelvic sepsis rates decreased from 7 per cent in 1981-1985 to 3 per cent in 1991-1994 (P = 0.02). After mean follow-up of 6.5 (range 2-15) years, the mean number of stools was 5 per day and 1 per night. Frequent daytime and nighttime incontinence occurred in 7 and 12 per cent of patients respectively, and did not change over a 10-year period. The cumulative probability of suffering at least one episode of 'clinical' pouchitis was 18 and 48 per cent at 1 and 10 years and the cumulative probability of pouch failure at 1 and 10 years was 2 and 9 per cent respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that increased experience decreases the risk of pouch-related complications and that with time the functional results remain stable, but the failure rate increases.

Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study is to compare the results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients in whom the anal mucosa is excised by handsewn techniques to those in whom the mucosa is preserved using stapling techniques.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the operation of choice for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis requiring proctocolectomy. Controversy exists over whether preserving the transitional mucosa of the anal canal improves outcomes.

METHODS

Forty-one patients (23 men, 18 women) were randomized to either endorectal mucosectomy and handsewn IPAA or to double-stapled IPAA, which spared the anal transition zone. All patients were diverted for 2 to 3 months. Nine patients were excluded. Preoperative functional status was assessed by questionnaire and anal manometry. Twenty-four patients underwent more extensive physiologic evaluation, including scintigraphic anopouch angle studies and pudendel never terminal motor latency a mean of 6 months after surgery. Quality of life similarly was estimated before surgery and after surgery. Univariate analysis using Wilcoxon test was used to assess differences between groups.

RESULTS

The two groups were identical demographically. Overall outcomes in both groups were good. Thirty-three percent of patients who underwent the handsewn technique and 35% of patients who underwent the double-stapled technique experienced a postoperative complication. Resting anal canal pressures were higher in the patients who underwent the stapled technique, but other physiologic parameters were similar between groups. Night-time fecal incontinence occurred less frequently in the stapled group but not significantly. The number of stools per 24 hours decreased from preoperative values in both groups. After IPAA, quality of life improved promptly in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Stapled IPAA, which preserves the mucosa of the anal transition zone, confers no apparent early advantage in terms of decreased stool frequency or fewer episodes of fecal incontinence compared to handsewn IPAA, which excises the mucosa. Higher resting pressures in the stapled group coupled with a trend toward less night-time incontinence, however, may portend better function in the stapled group over time. Both operations are safe and result in rapid and profound improvement in quality of life.

Surgical options in ulcerative colitis

The length of ileum used rather than pouch configuration per se is related to eventual functional outcome: A pouch constructed from 15- to 20-cm limbs is ideal. One-stage procedures appear feasible in those patients who are not malnourished or taking steroids and in whom a tension-free anastomosis may be achieved. Because most of our patients do not satisfy these criteria, single-stage IPAA is rarely used at the Mayo Clinic. The decision to excise the ATZ should relate to the risk of developing subsequent neoplasia. All patients with FAP should have a mucosectomy performed. Patients with CUC who do not have a mucosectomy should have life-long surveillance. Indeed, an argument can be made that all patients should undergo surveillance after IPAA. The decision to staple the anastomosis impacts little on eventual functional outcome but does preserve the ATZ with the attendant risk of recurrent disease, polyps, and neoplasia. When cancer is a presenting feature, the decision to perform IPAA should be based on the stage of the tumor and the subsequent need for radiation therapy. Patients with early-stage tumors not requiring adjuvant radiation therapy attain long-term function comparable to that of patients who have had an IPAA for benign disease.

Stapled colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis without a diverting colostomy for rectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Colonic J-pouch reconstruction is designed to improve functional outcome of coloanal anastomosis. Most surgeons use a diverting colostomy to avoid severe pelvic sepsis caused by anastomotic breakdown.

METHODS

We report the outcome of 30 consecutive patients with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis without a diverting colostomy performed between November 1992 and October 1993. All patients had carcinoma of the lower two-thirds of the rectum. Patients were seen every three months. Functional results were compared with those of 21 rectal cancer patients with straight coloanal anastomosis who underwent surgery in the same period and 20 normal patients.

RESULTS

There were two anastomotic leakages and one postoperative death. After one year, patients with pouch anastomosis had significantly less frequency of defecation and rectal urgency compared with those with straight anastomosis (P < 0.01); 48 percent of patients with straight anastomosis had more than five bowel movements per day, whereas all patients with pouch anastomosis had five or less bowel movements per day. Manometric studies showed maximum tolerable volume was significantly higher in patients with pouch anastomosis (81 vs. 152 ml; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Stapled colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis without a diverting colostomy is a reliable procedure that provides good, long-term functional results.

Selective preservation of the anal transition zone in ileoanal pouch procedures

PURPOSE

A prospective trial was conducted to evaluate use of certain preoperative criteria in the choice of operative technique for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Handsewn vs. stapled anastomotic techniques were compared as was preservation vs. excision of the anal transition zone (ATZ).

METHODS

Over an 18-month period, 40 consecutive patients underwent restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA for ulcerative colitis (31 cases) or familial adenomatous polyposis (9 cases). In 28 patients, ATZ was completely excised, by either a transanal mucosectomy with handsewn anastomosis (Group I, 13 cases) or by double-stapled technique (Group II, 15 cases). The ATZ was preserved and the anastomosis was double-stapled in colitis patients with suboptimum sphincter function and/or greater than 50 years of age in the absence of dysplasia or severe distal proctitis (Group III, 12 cases).

RESULTS

Groups I and II patients were homogeneous in their preoperative variables and had equivalent functional outcome. Group III patients were older (P = 0.0001), with weaker preoperative anal sphincter resting tone (P = 0.024). Compared with Groups I and II, patients in Group III had significantly greater 24-hour stool frequency (P = 0.0056), daytime stool frequency (P = 0.0125), and incidence of daytime fecal seepage (P = 0.007). There was no significant difference in other outcome variables in Group III patients. There was no difference in morbidity in the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Transanal mucosectomy with handsewn anastomosis provided early functional results equivalent to low anal transection with double-stapled IPAA in younger patients with excellent preoperative sphincter function. A double-stapled technique with preservation of the ATZ may be reserved for older patients, with poorer anal sphincter function, at minimum dysplasia/cancer risk, to optimize continence figures.

Physiology of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Current concepts

PURPOSE

Increasing experience with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) associated with increasing knowledge about anorectal physiology has lead to a large number of publications. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current understanding of fecal continence as revealed by the evolution of the ileoanal procedure.

METHODS

Review of the literature covering the most important physiologic parameters involved in fecal continence was undertaken.

RESULTS

Rectoanal inhibitory reflex is probably absent after IPAA but is preserved when distal anorectal mucosa is spared. Anal resting pressure decreases but is less affected when the internal anal sphincter is less traumatized. Squeeze pressure is not importantly affected, and the importance of reservoir function as a determinant of stool frequency is emphasized. IPAA does not affect the coordination between pouch and anal canal motility in the majority of cases. Normal continence is preserved, even during the night, by preserving a gradient of pressure between the pouch and anal canal.

CONCLUSIONS

Physiologic concepts are well established, but controversies about the continence mechanism related to IPAA remain. The IPAA procedure has allowed discrimination of details about the function of multiple structures involved in fecal continence.

Risk of residual rectal mucosa after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal reconstruction with the double-stapling technique. Postoperative endoscopic follow-up study

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess the risk of retained rectal mucosa after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique.

METHODS

A total of 113 patients underwent proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal reconstruction. In 57 patients the anastomosis between pouch and proximal anal canal was performed using the double-stapling technique. In 26 patients the procedure was carried out without a protecting ileostomy. Of the remaining 31 patients with a proximal ileostomy, 15 underwent endoscopy six weeks postoperatively. Circular biopsies were taken just distal from the pouch-anal anastomosis.

RESULTS

Histologic examination revealed rectal mucosa in at least one biopsy in 7 of 15 patients. At follow-up (mean 18 months) no (distal) pouchitis was clinically noticed. In one patient with familial polyposis, a few polyps, distal of the anastomosis, had to be endoscopically removed.

CONCLUSIONS

Double-stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has a considerable risk of residual rectal mucosa, because of combined linear transection and circular stapling with bilateral dog-ear formation of rectal mucosa. Residual rectal mucosa did not seem to influence clinical results at follow-up.

Restorative proctocolectomy without diverting ileostomy

PURPOSE

Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) by abdominal colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in the setting of chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) has gained widespread popularity among surgeons and patients. Traditionally, temporary loop ileostomy has been established proximal to the ileal pouch in an effort to mitigate the effects of any suture line complications that may occur. This study compares functional results and complications encountered after RPC with mucosectomy with and without temporary ileostomy.

METHODS

One hundred forty-three consecutive patients with either CUC or FAP underwent RPC including mucosectomy and ileal "J" reservoir. Proximal loop ileostomy was performed in 69 patients, and ileostomy was omitted in 74. Ileostomy was omitted if the patient was taking no immunosuppressives and less than 20 mg of prednisone daily in the month preceding surgery, the anastomosis was absolutely tension-free, and blood supply to the pouch was excellent.

RESULTS

There were no perioperative deaths. There were two instances of pelvic abscess, one in the diverted group and one in the nondiverted group. Occurrence of IPAA suture line dehiscence was not significantly different between the two groups (ileostomy, 4/69 (6 percent), vs. no ileostomy, 6/74 (8 percent); P > 0.05). Comparison of 129 patients with colitis with and without diversion also failed to demonstrate a significant difference with regard to IPAA suture line dehiscence (ileostomy, 4/69 (6 percent) vs. 4/60 (7 percent); P > 0.05). Frequency of bowel movements and continence were the same in both groups and were comparable with results obtained without mucosectomy. Mean hospital stay at time of RPC for the nondiverted group was significantly longer (12 days vs. 10 days; P = 0.0004). Significantly fewer patients without an ileostomy were hospitalized for partial intestinal obstruction (ileostomy, 13/69 (19 percent), vs. no ileostomy, 3/74 (4 percent); P = 0.02), and significantly fewer required enterolysis (ileostomy, 7/69 (10 percent), vs. no ileostomy, 1/74 (1 percent); P = 0.04). On average, patients without an ileostomy spent significantly fewer total days in the hospital (17 vs. 24; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Restorative proctocolectomy with mucosectomy and without ileostomy is the procedure of choice for selected patients with FAP and CUC. Septic complications and functional results are similar to those seen in patients managed with a stoma. Anastomotic leakage, when it occurs, can be safely managed in most cases without surgery. RPC without ileostomy results in significantly fewer episodes of intestinal obstruction, fewer instances of re-exploration, and fewer total days in the hospital.

Update on the surgical management of ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis: current controversies and problems

: The surgical management of ulcerative colitis has been revolutionized in recent years by the development of the ileal pouch-anal procedure. Although it is now the operation of choice for most patients, there remain several controversies. A variety of designs of ileal pouch are available each with advantages and disadvantages. The technique used to anastomose the pouch to the anal canal is also open to debate with some surgeons favoring distal mucosectomy with eradication of all disease and others choosing to perform a stapled anastomosis to achieve better functional results. The main concern for gastroenterologists, however, is the risk of development of pouchitis. The etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of this condition will also be discussed in this review as well as the more classical options for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Outcome of early surgical complications following ileoanal pouch operation without diverting ileostomy

BACKGROUND

Many surgeons use a diverting ileostomy routinely following ileoanal pouch operation because they fear that complications may lead to permanent unsatisfactory pouch function or even death. We report the outcome of early surgical complications when ileoanal pouch operation is performed without a diverting ileostomy. We performed 74 consecutive ileoanal pouch operations since ileoanal pouch operations since October 1989 using a transition-zone-sparing stapled J pouch method.

RESULTS

Of the 74 patients, 68 (92%) underwent the operation without a diverting ileostomy. Five of the 68 patients (7.4%) required reoperation within 30 days of operation. Pouch excision was necessary in 2 patients (3%) for reasons not resulting from omitting the diverting ileostomy, and they now have excellent pouch function.

CONCLUSION

Patients who required early reoperation and placement of a temporary diverting ileostomy did not suffer long-term consequences. The fear that early surgical complications following ileoanal pouch operation without diverting ileostomy are permanently detrimental is unjustified.

Functional outcome in handsewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Eighty-eight of 119 patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis were evaluated. Forty patients had a handsewn anastomosis (Hs) with mucosectomy, and 48 had a stapled anastomosis (St). In each patient, we evaluated operative, morphologic, functional, and manometric features. The results in the Hs and St groups were similar when the anastomosis was within 1 cm of the dentate line. In particular, there was no correlation between the type of anastomosis and the number of bowel movements in a 24-hour period, the presence of the urge to defecate, and the use of antidiarrheal drugs. Leakage was significantly higher in the Hs group, even when the anastomosis was less than 1 cm from the dentate line. Pouchitis was more frequent in the Hs group, and, within this group, among those with a short distance between the anastomosis and the dentate line. No correlations were found between the presence of columnar epithelium or active colitis in the mucosa below the anastomosis, the functional outcomes, and the incidence of pouchitis.

Development of invasive adenocarcinoma following colectomy with ileoanal anastomosis for familial polyposis coli. Report of a case

PURPOSE

Proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis has gained increasing acceptance for the prophylactic treatment of patients with familial polyposis coli. Long-term surveillance of the ileal pouch and the pouch-anal anastomosis has not been emphasized despite concern regarding retained rectal mucosa following the procedure.

METHODS

A 34-year-old patient with a strong family history of familial polyposis coli was treated at 14 years of age by single-stage proctocolectomy with straight ileoanal anastomosis. Follow-up proctoscopic examinations revealed development of adenomatous changes at the ileoanal anastomosis.

RESULTS

This report presents a patient with familial polyposis coli who developed invasive adenocarcinoma at the ileoanal anastomosis 20 years after proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis.

CONCLUSIONS

We stress the need for lifelong proctoscopic surveillance in patients with familial polyposis coli treated by proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis.

Prospectively evaluating anal sphincter function after ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis

The decreased anal sphincter pressure that occurs after ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis (IPAA) has usually been attributed to damage of the internal and sphincter. We hypothesized that the operation damages both the internal and the external anal sphincter. Resting pressure in the anal canal (a function of internal and external sphincters), anal squeeze pressure (a function of external sphincter only), and the rectal-anal inhibitory reflex (involving the internal sphincter) were measured manometrically in 10 patients with ulcerative colitis (4 women and 6 men; mean age, 33 years; range: 20 to 49 years). The patients were studied while awake before IPAA, under general anesthesia with striated muscle blockade just before incision, awake 2 months later before ileostomy takedown, and again under anesthesia with blockade just before takedown. The operation decreased maximum resting anal pressure while awake and during anesthesia with blockade. The decrease was detected in the proximal anal canal but not in the distal anal canal. In addition, the operation impaired anal squeeze pressure and abolished the rectal-anal inhibitory reflex. We conclude that IPAA damages both the internal and the external anal sphincter.

Loop ileostomy for temporary fecal diversion

The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the morbidity of creating and closing loop ileostomies in a consecutive series of patients having an ileoanal pouch procedure. Between 1983 and 1991, 203 patients had loop ileostomies created for temporary fecal diversion after an ileoanal pouch procedure. There was one death as a result of liver failure. One patient developed a persistent pouch-vaginal fistula that resulted in pouch excision. The remaining 201 patients had their ileostomies closed at a mean time of 10 weeks after the primary procedure. Only 7% needed surgery to correct ileostomy-related problems. After ileostomy closure, complications were noted in only 2% of patients. Loop ileostomy is easy to create and provides highly effective fecal diversion, which decreases the incidence of and mitigates the serious sequelae of pouch sepsis. Closure is simple, does not require a laparotomy, and is associated with few complications. Our experience with loop ileostomy for temporary fecal diversion after an ileoanal pouch procedure has been favorable. The loop ileostomy may be the stoma of choice for most clinical situations in which temporary fecal diversion is indicated.

Stapled ileoanal anastomosis without a temporary ileostomy

Stapled J-pouch ileoanal operations were performed in 75 patients (35 men, 40 women; 72 with ulcerative colitis, 3 with familial polyposis) without an ileostomy in 68 (43 taking prednisone, 12 emergent surgery, 8 completion proctectomy with ileostomy takedown). The seven primary ileostomies were due to technical difficulties in two patients and toxic colitis in four patients. No patients were lost to follow-up. Of patients followed for more than 1 month, 96% had perfect daytime control, 86% had no nocturnal accidents, and 73% had no nocturnal spotting. Mucosa between the dentate line and the anastomosis averaged 1.1 +/- 1.0 cm, with the anastomosis at, or below, the dentate line in 16 patients, of whom 14 had excellent continence. Stools in 24 hours averaged 6.9 +/- 0.3, of which 1.8 +/- 0.2 were at night. Stool frequency was unrelated to gender, anastomotic distance from the dentate line, or age; however, patients 50 years of age or older had more problems with nocturnal fecal control than those younger than 50 years of age. Anastomotic leaks (four), cuff abscess (one), pouch leaks (two), and pelvic abscesses (three) were treated with drainage in all patients and ileostomy in five. Pouchitis occurred in 31% of patients and responded to oral antibiotic therapy. Acute complications were fewer, functional pouches greater, stool control better, and overall hospitalization shorter (all p < 0.01) than those in our 63 patients with a mucosectomy and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis.

Omission of temporary diversion in restorative proctocolectomy--is it safe?

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and functional outcome of restorative proctocolectomy (RP) without diversion.

METHODS

Fifty patients underwent RP without diversion for ulcerative colitis (82 percent), familial adenomatous polyposis (12 percent), and indeterminate colitis (6 percent). The perioperative course and functional outcome of these patients were compared with another group of 50 patients undergoing RP with diverting ileostomy during the same time period (1989-1991) and closely matched for age, gender, surgeon, diagnosis, extent and duration (median, 10 years) of colitis, prior colectomy (approximately 22 percent), steroid use (40 percent), type of pouch, distance of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis from the dentate line (median, 1.5 cm), and the duration of follow-up (median, 12 months). All patients had a stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosectomy and a smooth conduct of the operation.

RESULTS

There was no operative mortality. Anastomotic leaks and pelvic abscess were more common in patients without ileostomy (7/50 or 14 percent vs. 2/50 or 4 percent); 8 of these 9 patients were taking > or = 20 mg of prednisone/day. Septic complications requiring relaparotomy (6 percent vs. 0 percent), prolonged ileus, and fever of unknown origin (10 percent vs. 4 percent) were also more common in patients without ileostomy. Despite similar functional results at 6 weeks and at 12 months after initial pouch function, patients without ileostomy had a poorer quality of life index (5 vs. 8; 10 being best) in the early period (0-6 weeks) of pouch function.

CONCLUSION

In equally favorable cases, RP without diversion is not as safe as RP with diversion, especially in patients taking > or = 20 mg of prednisone/day.

The ileal pouch operation for ulcerative colitis

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis cures chronic ulcerative colitis with an acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality. The great majority of patients achieve satisfactory continence with an excellent quality of life. However, continence is not perfect, and fecal soilage is a troublesome problem for a small number of patients. Moreover, as many as one third of patients develop pouchitis, for which an effective means of long-term prevention or treatment has yet to be developed. Finally, controversial issues such as optimal pouch design or technique of anastomosis will be resolved only when long-term follow-up of randomized trials has been completed.

Fistula complicating restorative proctocolectomy

Twenty-seven patients developed a fistula after 168 restorative proctocolectomies. Thirteen fistulas were enterocutaneous (two with communication to the bladder); their origins were from the pouch (three patients), the ileoanal anastomosis (three), the pouch appendage (three), a previous loop ileostomy (two) and iatrogenic small bowel injury (two). Two patients had Crohn's disease. The pouch was removed in four patients, one of whom died from chronic small bowel obstruction; the remaining nine have satisfactory pouch function after fistula excision. Ten pouch-vaginal fistulas occurred, all from the ileoanal anastomosis; four were extrasphincteric. Four of these patients had underlying Crohn's disease. Only two patients, with Crohn's disease and indeterminate colitis, required pouch excision; the remainder have good pouch function after treatment of the fistula. There were three pouch-perineal fistulas, all from the ileoanal anastomosis; these were successfully managed by seton fistulotomy. There was one pouch-vesical fistula, successfully treated by excision of the fistula and pouch appendage.

An audit of restorative proctocolectomy

A total of 168 restorative proctocolectomies have been performed without mortality during the past nine years. Morbidity from pelvic sepsis (12%), ileoanal stricture (15%), and pouch related fistulas (16%) have become less with increasing experience of the operation. Pouch excision, which occurred in 30% of the first 50 patients was undertaken in only 4% in the last 68 patients. Despite this, intestinal obstruction (18%) continues to complicate the operation. We have abandoned restorative proctocolectomy after failed ileorectal anastomosis in patients with slow transit constipation as half have now requested pouch excision because of poor results. Failure to identify Crohn's disease continues to influence the outcome: in 10 patients now known to have Crohn's disease six developed post operative fistulas, three have required pouch excision. Sexual impairment has occurred in three male patients (4%). Ten women had children after operation, eight uncomplicated vaginal deliveries occurred without impaired continence. Seven of nine patients over 60 years of age have had a successful outcome. Our data also indicate that the operation may be justified in distal disease if urgency is socially inconvenient. Frequency of defecation is usually less than three per 24 hours in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis but remains variable in those with ulcerative colitis.