Treatment of rectal cancer by low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis

A Case of Colon Cancer with Extramural Tumor Deposits in the Main Lymph Node Area: A Case Report

A 72-year-old man with type 2 sub-circumferential tumors in the descending colon and two nodules around the pedicle of the inferior mesenteric artery (main lymph node area) underwent laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy. Two lymph nodes around the inferior mesenteric artery pedicle were completely excised. Pathological examination revealed a moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. Nodules were only found in the main lymph node area, and no lymph node structures were observed in these nodules. These tumor deposits (TDs) may be extramural TDs without lymph node structure or lymph node skip metastasis. The presence of TDs in colorectal cancer is associated with an adverse prognosis, and the requirement of chemotherapy in such cases should be examined. Therefore, it is important to correctly recognize TDs and categorize the disease into a high- or low-risk group within stage III. We report this case because it is necessary to review the definition of TDs, and the assessment of extramural TDs remains controversial.

Comparison of long-term quality of life based on surgical procedure in patients with rectal cancer

Introduction

Reports on the long-term quality of life (QOL) over 3 years after surgery in patients who have undergone surgery for rectal cancer are limited. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the long-term QOL of patients who underwent high anterior resection (HAR), low anterior resection (LAR), internal sphincter resection (ISR), or abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer.

Methods

A questionnaire regarding QOL was sent to 360 patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative resection by HAR, LAR, ISR, or APR between January 2005 and December 2015. QOL was assessed using the short-form 36 (SF-36) and modified fecal incontinence QOL (mFIQL) questionnaire. QOL between surgical procedures was analyzed using a multivariate model adjusted for age, sex, and postoperative time.

Results

A total of 144 patients responded with a median follow-up period of 94 months (range 38-233 months). According to surgical procedure, HAR was performed in 26 patients, LAR in 80 patients, ISR in 32 patients, and APR in 6 patients. Patients who underwent HAR had significantly better mFIQL scores than those who underwent LAR and ISR (p=0.013 and p=0004, respectively) and significantly better role/social component summary scores on the SF-36 subscales (p=0.007). No difference was observed in the mFIQL scores between patients who underwent ISR and those who underwent APR (p=0.8423). In addition, postoperative anastomotic leakage sutures did not influence the mFIQL and SF-36 scores after surgery.

Conclusion

The QOL of patients who underwent anus-preserving surgery was best in the HAR group, with the QOL of other groups similar to the APR group. These results suggest that anus- preserving surgery is acceptable from a QOL standpoint. However, a colostomy may be a more satisfactory procedure in some patients.

Measurement of distal intramural spread and the optimal distal resection by naked eyes after neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancers

Background

The safe distance between the intraoperative resection line and the visible margin of the distal rectal tumor after preoperative radiotherapy is unclear. We aimed to investigate the furthest tumor intramural spread distance in fresh tissue to determine a safe distal intraoperative resection margin length.

Methods

Twenty rectal cancer specimens were collected after preoperative radiotherapy. Tumor intramural spread distances were defined as the distance between the tumor’s visible and microscopic margins. Visible tumor margins in fresh specimens were identified during the operation and were labeled with 5 - 0 sutures under the naked eye at the distal 5, 6, and 7 o’clock directions of visible margins immediately after removal of the tumor. After fixation with formalin, the sutures were injected with nanocarbon particles. Longitudinal tissues were collected along three labels and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The spread distance after formalin fixation was measured between the furthest intramural spread of tumor cells and the nanocarbon under a microscope. A positive intramural spread distance indicated that the furthest tumor cell was distal to the nanocarbon, and a negative value indicated that the tumor cell was proximal to the nanocarbon. The tumor intramural spread distance in fresh tissue during the operation was 1.75 times the tumor intramural spread distance after formalin fixation according to the literature.

Results

At the distal 5, 6, and 7 o’clock direction, seven (35%), five (25%), and six (30%) patients, respectively, had distal tumor cell intramural spread distance > 0 mm. The mean and 95% confidence interval of tumor cell intramural spread distance in fresh tissue during operation was − 0.3 (95%CI − 4.0 ~ 3.4) mm, − 0.9 (95%CI − 3.4 ~ 1.7) mm, and − 0.4 (95%CI − 3.5 ~ 2.8) mm, respectively. The maximal intraoperative intramural spread distances in fresh tissue were 8.8, 7, and 7 mm, respectively.

Conclusions

The intraoperative distance between the distal resection line and the visible margin of the rectal tumor after radiotherapy should not be less than 1 cm to ensure oncological safety.

ISR for T1-2 Low Rectal Cancer: A Japanese Approach

The evolution over the past 20 years of anal preservation in rectal cancer surgery has been truly remarkable. Intersphincteric resection (ISR) reported by Schiessel in 1994 in Australia has been shown to enable anal preservation even for cancers quite close to the anus. In Japan, ISR via the detachment of the anal canal between the internal and external sphincters and excision of the internal sphincter first began to be practiced in the latter half of 1990. A multicenter Phase II trial of ISR in Japan suggested that 70% of the cases had relatively good function with less than 10 points of Wexner score but around 10% had severe incontinence that would not be improved for long term. The primary end point of the clinical study, 3-year local recurrence rate, was 13.2% across the overall cohort (T1, 0%; T2, 6.9%; and T3, 21.6%). When ISR is performed on T1/T2 rectal cancers, sufficient circumferential resection margin can be obtained even without preoperative chemoradiotherapy, and local recurrence rate was acceptably low. Based on these evidences, ISR is a currently important, standard treatment option among anal-preserving surgeries for T1/T2 low-lying rectal cancers. In Japan, a feasibility study (LapRC trial) of laparoscopic ISR on Stage 0 and Stage 1 low rectal cancer showed excellent outcomes. A prospective Phase II clinical trial targeting low rectal cancers within 5 cm from the anal verge (ultimate trial) is being performed and awaiting the results in near future.

Oncologic safety and bowel function after ultralow anterior resection with or without intersphincteric resection for low lying rectal cancer: Comparative cross sectional study

BACKGROUND

Despite acceptable oncologic outcomes of sphincter preserving surgeries for low rectal cancer, bowel dysfunction occurs. This study aimed to compare the oncologic and functional bowel outcomes between ultralow anterior resection (ULAR) and intersphincteric resection (ISR) for low rectal cancer.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-four patients who underwent ULAR with or without ISR for low rectal cancer between December 2010 and May 2018 were included. The Wexner and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) scores were used to evaluate the bowel function of patients. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between patients.

RESULTS

The ISR group had higher incidence of major fecal incontinence than the ULAR group (75.9% vs 49.3%; P = .016). The median Wexner score decreased from 12 to 9 (P = .062) at 1-year follow-up. However, the frequency and urgency/soilage subscales of MSKCC score improved significantly in the ULAR group. ISR and follow-up interval less than 1-year significantly increased the major incontinence risk. The OS in the ULAR and ISR groups was 91.4% and 91.7%. Whereas the DFS in both groups was 79% and 79.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ULAR and ISR are comparable in oncologic outcomes. Severe bowel dysfunctions and major incontinence were noted in ISR group. Careful selection of patients is mandatory.

Factors predicting recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer: a 16-year study

BACKGROUND

The recurrence after curative surgery of the rectal adenocarcinoma is a serious complication, considered as a failure of the therapeutic strategy. The aim of this study was to identify the different prognostic factors affecting the recurrence of adenocarcinoma of the rectum.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients operated for adenocarcinoma of the rectum between January 2000 and December 2015 was conducted. The study of the recurrence rate and prognostic factors was performed through the Kaplan Meier survival curve and the Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

During the study period, 188 patients underwent curative surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma, among which 53 had a recurrence. The recurrence rate was 44.6% at 5 years. The multivariate analysis identified four parameters independently associated with the risk of recurrence after curative surgery: a distal margin ≤ 2 cm (HR = 6.8, 95% CI 2.7-16.6, 6), extracapsular invasion of lymph node metastasis (HR = 4.4, 95% CI 1.3-14), tumor stenosis (HR = 4.3, 95% CI 1.2-15.2), and parietal invasion (pT3/T4 disease) (HR = 3, 95% CI 1.1-9.4).

CONCLUSION

The determination of the prognostic factors affecting the recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma after curative surgery allows us to define the high-risk patients for recurrence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03899870 . Registered on 2 February 2019, retrospectively registered.

Tumor Biological Aspects of Epithelial versus Mesenchymal Tumors of the Gastrointestinal Tract

One of the holy grails of cancer surgery for surgical oncologists is to perform a macroscopically complete resection of the affected organ or site with negative microscopic margins. The surgical oncologist must also be mindful of what constitutes appropriately-sized negative margins. However, what is necessary, based on the best available evidence, can vary considerably for different malignancies arising within the same organ. This review compares two different gastric and rectal malignancies, one each of epithelial and of mesenchymal origin. Data supporting extent of margins will be reviewed, illustrating the importance of knowing the histologic diagnosis prior to surgery to provide proper oncologic care.

Intersphincteric Resection for Patients With Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: Oncological and Functional Outcomes

The aim of this review is to evaluate the outcomes after an intersphincteric resection (ISR) for patients with low-lying rectal cancer. Reports published in the literature regarding surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of an ISR were reviewed. The morbidity after an ISR was 7.7%–32%, and anastomotic leakage was the most common adverse event. Local recurrence rates ranged from 0% to 12%, 5-year overall survival rates ranged from 62% to 92%, and rates of major incontinence ranged from 0% to 25.8% after an ISR. An ISR is a safe procedure for sphincter-saving rectal surgery in patients with very low rectal cancer; it does not compromise the oncological outcomes of the resection and is a valuable alternative to an abdominoperineal resection. While the functional outcomes after an ISR were found to be acceptable, the long-term functional outcome and quality of life still require careful investigation. ISRs have been performed with surgical and oncologic safety on patients with low-lying rectal cancer. However, patients must be selected very carefully for an ISR, considering the associated functional derangement and the limited extent of the resection.

Frequent Presence of Lymphovascular Invasion in Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors on Immunohistochemical Analysis

Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (RNETs) have become common in recent years and are good candidates for endoscopic resection (ER). To achieve clear resection margins, more advanced techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device, and cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection are available for ER. After ER, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is regarded as an important predictor of nodal metastasis. Previous studies have shown that small RNETs with LVI were uncommon (0-8.3%). However, using immunohistochemical analysis, a recent study revealed the frequent occurrence of LVI in small RNETs in a systematic manner (46.7%). There is a possibility that the actual detection rate of LVI in small RNETs is not always evaluated accurately because of the limited detection sensitivity of conventional hematoxylin-eosin staining. In addition, the correlation between LVI detected using immunohistochemical analysis and the development of metastasis remains unclear. Further prospective studies are required to clarify the role of LVI detected using immunohistochemical analysis.

Comparative clinicopathological characteristics of colon and rectal T1 carcinoma

Lymph node metastasis significantly influences the management of patients with colorectal carcinoma. It has been observed that the biology of colorectal carcinoma differs by location. The aim of the current study was to retrospectively compare the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with colon and rectal T1 carcinomas, particularly their rates of lymph node metastasis. Of the 19,864 patients who underwent endoscopic or surgical resection of colorectal neoplasms at Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 557 had T1 surgically resected carcinomas, including 457 patients with colon T1 carcinomas and 100 patients with rectal T1 carcinomas. Analysed clinicopathological features included patient age, gender, tumor size, morphology, tumor budding, invasion depth, vascular invasion, histological grade, lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis. Rectal T1 carcinomas were significantly larger than colon T1 carcinomas (mean ± standard deviation: 23.7±13.1 mm vs. 19.9±11.0 mm, P<0.01) and were accompanied by significantly higher rates of vascular invasion (48.0% vs. 30.2%, P<0.01). Significant differences were not observed among any other clinicopathological factors. In conclusion, tumor location itself was not a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in colorectal T1 carcinomas, even though on average, rectal T1 carcinomas were larger and accompanied by a significantly higher rate of vascular invasion than colon T1 carcinomas.

Association between pathologic features of peripheral nerves and postoperative anal function after neoadjuvant therapy for low rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer improves local control but also induces severe postoperative anal dysfunction that may be related to neural degeneration. The aims of the study were to identify pathological features of neural degeneration caused by neoadjuvant CRT or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and to evaluate the association between neural degeneration and anal function.

METHODS

A retrospective study using chronologically different groups was performed in 95 patients with rectal cancer treated with curative resection with neoadjuvant CRT (n = 47), NAC (n = 27), or surgery alone (no neoadjuvant therapy) (n = 21) at National Cancer Center Hospital East from 2001 to 2014. Peripheral nerve degeneration was evaluated histopathologically using H&E stained sections, based on karyopyknosis, vacuolar or acidophilic degeneration, denucleation, adventitial neuron change, and fibrosis. Morphological analysis of peripheral nerves was compared among the three groups. The association between pathological features and anal function (Wexner Score) was evaluated.

RESULTS

After CRT, the degree of fibrosis around the tumor was severe, and neural degeneration was found in peripheral neurons. With NAC and surgery alone, there was little fibrosis and neural degeneration. Pathological changes after CRT were more pronounced than those after NAC, indicating greater tissue degeneration due to CRT. There was an association between anal function and degeneration score in the CRT group, but not in the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral nerves in patients who received neoadjuvant CRT showed characteristic pathological features indicating greater degeneration, compared with patients who received NAC. Neural degeneration is associated with anal function and several pathological factors after CRT.

Enhanced detection of lymphovascular invasion in small rectal neuroendocrine tumors using D2-40 and Elastica van Gieson immunohistochemical analysis

Rectal neuroendocrine tumor (RNET) lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is regarded as an important predictor of nodal metastasis after endoscopic resection (ER). However, little is known about the frequency of immunohistochemical detection of LVI in RNETs. This study was performed to establish the actual detection of LVI rate in RNETs ≤10 mm and to evaluate associated clinical outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the records for 98 consecutive patients treated by ER with a total of 102 RNETs ≤10 mm. Tissue sections were labeled with hematoxylin–eosin (HE) stain, the D2‐40 monoclonal antibody to evaluate lymphatic invasion, and Elastica van Gieson (EVG) stain to detect venous invasion. LVI detection rate by HE versus immunohistochemical analysis was compared. Follow‐up findings and clinical outcomes were also evaluated for 91 patients who were followed for ≥12 months. Lymphatic and venous invasion were detected using HE staining alone in 6.9% and 3.9% of patients, respectively, whereas they were detected using D2‐40 and EVG staining in 20.6% and 47.1% of the patients, respectively. Thus, the LVI detection frequency using D2‐40 and EVG staining (56.9%) was significantly higher than with HE (8.8%). Two out of seven patients who required additional surgery had regional lymph node metastases. However, among the 84 patients who were followed up without surgery, no distant metastases or recurrences were detected. Compared with HE staining, immunohistochemical analysis significantly increased the frequency of LVI detection in RNETs ≤10 mm. However, the clinical impact of LVIs detected using immunohistochemical analysis remains unclear. Clarification of the actual role of LVI using immunohistochemical analysis requires a patient long‐term follow‐up and outcomes.

Clinical Significance of Extramural Tumor Deposits in the Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Area in Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study at Two Institutions

Background

The presence of extramural tumor deposits without lymph node structure (EX) is an important prognostic factor for patients with colorectal cancer. However, the clinical significance of EX in the lateral pelvic lymph node area (LP-EX) remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the prognostic implications of LP-EX for patients with low rectal cancer.

Methods

This retrospective study involved 172 consecutive patients with stage 2 or 3 low rectal cancer who underwent curative surgery including lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) dissection. The patients were classified into the following three groups according to the metastatic status of the LPLN area: patients without metastasis (no-LP-M group), patients with lymph node metastasis (LP-LNM group), and patients with EX (LP-EX group). Potential prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were identified in uni- and multivariate analyses.

Results

Classification assigned 131 patients (76 %) to the no-LP-M group, 27 patients (16 %) to the LP-LNM group, and 14 patients (8 %) to the LP-EX group. The 5-year OS rate was 80.3 % in the no-LP-M group, 61.1 % in the LP-LNM group, and 34.9 % in the LP-EX group (P < 0.001). The corresponding 5-year RFS rates were 62.2, 33.8, and 14.3 %, respectively (P < 0.001). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the presence of LP-EX was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.006) and RFS (P = 0.001).

Conclusions

The LP-EX classification is a useful pathologic parameter that can be used to stratify patients with metastasis in the LPLN area.

Long-term results of extended intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a retrospective study

Background

Intersphincteric resection (ISR) has become an increasingly popular optional surgical tool for the treatment of very low rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term oncological and functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection for T2 and T3 rectal cancer situated below 4 cm from the anal verge.

Methods

A total of 62 consecutive patients with very low rectal cancer who underwent ISR from 2001 to 2010 were classified into standard ISR for T2 lesions (Group I, n = 24) and extended ISR for T3 lesions (Group II, n = 38).

Results

The 5-year overall survival rates were 95.8 % for group I and 94.7 % for group II. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 87.5 % for group I and 86.8 % for group II. Bowel functions were evaluated at the 12^th and 24^th months after ileostomy closure in both groups. The frequency of bowel evacuation was higher in patients who underwent extended ISR than in those who underwent standard ISR at the 12^th month (p < 0.05). However, at the 24^th month, the frequencies decreased in both groups, exhibiting no significant difference. In the comparison based on the Kirwan classification, group I showed better continence status than group II but no significant difference. The Wexner scores of both groups revealed that the average score was 7.33 ± 2.8 in group I and 8.18 ± 2.9 in group II at the 12^th month, and at the 24^th month, the average score was 5.21 ± 1.7 in group I and 5.82 ± 1.9 in group II. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusions

Extended ISR with quadrant resection of the upper external sphincter achieved good post-operative continence status, OS and RFS. Extended ISR can thus be an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for very low rectal cancer without compromising the chance of cure and improving quality of life.

Fecoflowmetric analysis of anorectal motor function in postoperative anal-preserving surgery patients with low rectal cancer comparison with the wexner score and anorectal manometry

The aim of this study was to elucidate whether fecoflowmetry (FFM) could evaluate more detailed evacuative function than anorectal manometry by comparing between FFM or anorectal manometric findings and the clinical questionnaires and the types of surgical procedure in the patients who received anal-preserving surgery. Fifty-three patients who underwent anal-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer were enrolled. The relationships between FFM or the manometric findings and the clinical questionnaires and the types of procedure of anal-preserving surgery were evaluated. There were significant differences between FFM markers and the clinical questionnaire and the types of the surgical procedure, whereas no significant relationship was observed between the manometric findings and the clinical questionnaire and the types of the surgical procedure. FFM might be feasible and useful for the objective assessment of evacuative function and may be superior to manometry for patients undergoing anal-preserving surgery.

Locally advanced rectal cancer: time for precision therapeutics

The year 2015 marks the 30th anniversary of the publication of NSABP-R01, a landmark trial demonstrating the benefit of adding pelvic radiation to the treatment regimen for locally advanced rectal cancer with a resultant decrease in local recurrence from 25% to 16%. These results ushered in the era of multimodal therapy for rectal cancer, heralding modern treatment and changing the standard of care in the United States. We have seen many advances over the past 3 decades, including optimization of the administration and timing of radiation, widespread adoption of total mesorectal excision (TME), and the implementation of more effective systemic chemotherapy. The current standard is neoadjuvant chemoradiation with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and a radiosensitizer, TME, and adjuvant chemotherapy including 5-FU and oxaliplatin. The results of this regimen have been impressive, with a reported local recurrence rate of less than 10%. However, the rates of distant relapse remain 30% to 40%, indicating room for improvement. In addition, trimodality therapy is arduous and many patients are unable to complete the full course of treatment. In this article we discuss the current standard of care and alternative strategies that have evolved in an attempt to individualize therapy according to risk of recurrence.

Effect of tumor deposits on overall survival in colorectal cancer patients with regional lymph node metastases

Objectives: The staging system of the International Union Against Cancer considers tumor deposits to be N1c in patients with no regional lymph node metastasis, but the significance of tumor deposits in patients with regional lymph node metastases is unclear. We investigated the effect of tumor deposits on overall survival in colorectal cancer patients with regional lymph node metastases.

Patients and Methods: From 2000 to 2008, 551 patients underwent resections for colorectal cancer at our medical center. We excluded 87 patients who had distant metastases or had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy from our study and statistically analyzed the remaining 464 patients.

Results: Stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis in patients with regional lymph node metastases showed only tumor deposits to be significant for overall survival (hazard ratio: 2.813; P = 0.0002). Recurrence was seen in 49.2% of patients with tumor deposits (30/61) compared with 14.4% of patients without them (58/403; P < 0.0001). Tumor deposits did not show the same effect on overall survival as lymph node metastases.

Conclusions: Tumor deposits were significantly associated with poorer overall survival in colorectal cancer patients with regional lymph node metastases. The effect of tumor deposits on overall survival was between that of lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis.

Long-term clinical and functional results of intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is an alternative to abdominoperineal resection (APR) for super-low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term curability after ISR over an average 6-year observational period, to compare the postoperative functional outcomes for ISR with those for low anterior resection (LAR), and to determine whether ISR is a function-preserving surgery.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2007, a total of 77 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer underwent curative ISR. The curability outcomes for ISR, LAR, and APR were compared. We evaluated the postoperative defecation functions, Wexner incontinence score (WIS), and defecation quality of life (QOL) for a between-groups comparison (ISR/LAR).

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate after ISR was 76.4 %, and the outcome was better than for APR (APR 51.2 %, LAR 80.7 %). Local recurrence after ISR occurred in 7.8 % of patients (APR 12.1 %, LAR 11.7 %). The average daily frequency of defecation was 3.7 times for the ISR patients and 3.2 times for the LAR patients, indicating no significant difference between the groups. Moreover, there were no significant differences between the groups for defecation functions. The WIS was 8.1 for ISR and 4.9 for LAR, and the defecation QOL for ISR and LAR was not significantly different (modified fecal incontinence QOL score: ISR 34.3, LAR 26.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term clinical and functional results suggest that ISR may be the optimal sphincter-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancers who cannot be treated with a double-stapling technique.

Distal dissection in total mesorectal excision, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy and lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer

The local recurrence rate after total mesorectal excision (TME) appears to be markedly lower than that after conventional operations. We reviewed all relevant articles identified from the MEDLINE databases and clarified the rationale for TME. It is clear that distal intramural spread is rare. Even when present, such spread is not likely to extend beyond 2 cm. Data with attention to mesorectal cancer deposits suggest that mesorectal clearance of at least 4-5 cm distal to the tumor should be sufficient. TME should be performed for most tumors of the mid- and lower rectum. This does not mean that the gut tube needs to be divided at the same level in every case. Dissection of the distal mesorectum off the gut tube can be performed, so the distal line of division of the bowel wall can be made at a minimum of 2 cm below the tumor if such a maneuver would ensure that the sphincters are preserved. In cases with cancer in the upper third of the rectum, the mesorectum and gut tube can safely be divided 5 cm below the tumor without jeopardizing the recurrence rates. Our findings indicate that TME is an essential treatment approach for rectal cancer, and lateral lymph node dissection and preoperative chemoradiotherapy are additional therapies that should be considered for advanced rectal cancer.

A novel animal model of long-term sustainable anal sphincter dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Although intersphincteric resection can avoid the need for permanent colostomy in patients with lower rectal cancer, it sometimes causes anal sphincter dysfunction, thus resulting in a lifelong, debilitating disorder due to incontinence of solid and liquid stool. The development of regenerative medicine could improve this condition by regenerating impaired anal muscle. In order to prove this hypothesis, preliminary experiments in animals will be indispensable; however, an adequate animal model is currently lacking. The purpose of this study was to establish a novel animal model with long-term sustainable anal sphincter dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated into sham operation (n = 10) and anal sphincter resection (ASR) (n = 10) groups. The ASR group underwent removal of the left half of both the internal and external anal sphincters. Both groups were evaluated for anal function by measuring their resting pressure before surgery and on postoperative day (POD) 1, 7, 14, and 28.

RESULTS

The rats in the sham operation group recovered their anal pressure up to baseline on POD 7. The rats in the ASR group showed a significant decrease in anal pressure on POD 1 (P < 0.0001) compared with the baseline, and kept this low pressure until POD 28 (P < 0.0001). The defect of the anal sphincter muscle was confirmed histologically in the ASR group on POD 28.

CONCLUSIONS

The present novel model exhibits continuous anal sphincter dysfunction for at least 1 mo and may contribute to further studies evaluating the efficacy of therapies such as regenerative medicine.

Long-term outcomes after resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Little is known about the long-term outcomes of patients with submucosal invasive colorectal cancer who undergo endoscopic or surgical resection. We performed a retrospective analysis of long-term outcomes of patients treated for submucosal colon and rectal cancer.

METHODS

We collected data on 549 patients with submucosal colon cancer and 209 patients with submucosal rectal cancer who underwent endoscopic or surgical resection at 6 institutions over a median follow-up period of 60.5 months. Patients were classified into one of 3 groups: low-risk patients undergoing only endoscopic resection (group A), high-risk patients undergoing only endoscopic resection (group B), and high-risk patients undergoing surgical resection that included lymph node dissection (group C). We assessed recurrence rates, 5-year disease-free survival, and 5-year overall survival. Cox regression analysis was used to compare recurrences.

RESULTS

The rates of recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival in group A for submucosal colon and rectal cancer were 0% versus 6.3% (P < .05), 96% versus 90%, and 96% versus 89%, respectively. For group B, these values were 1.4% versus 16.2% (P < .01), 96% versus 77% (P < .01), and 98% versus 96%, respectively; local recurrence was observed in 5 patients (one with submucosal colon cancer and 4 with submucosal rectal cancer). Tumor location was the only factor that contributed significantly to disease recurrence and death (hazard ratio, 6.73; P = .045). For group C, these values were 1.9% versus 4.5%, 97% versus 95%, and 99% versus 97%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk for local recurrence was significantly higher in high-risk patients with submucosal rectal cancer than in patients with submucosal colon cancer when treated with only endoscopic resection. The addition of surgery is therefore recommended for patients with submucosal rectal cancer with pathologic features indicating a high risk of tumor progression; University Hospital Medical Network Clinical Trials Registry, Number: UMIN 000008635.

Comparison of intracorporeal single-stapled and double-stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a case-control study

PURPOSE

Recently, a single-stapled technique (SST) was performed instead of the conventional double-stapled technique (DST) in laparoscopic low anterior resection for anastomosis, by placement of intracorporeal purse-string sutures on the distal rectum with transanal specimen extraction. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes between the two anastomotic techniques.

METHODS

Between July 2007 and April 2010, 60 patients underwent SST by laparoscopic or robotic procedure. These patients were matched 1:2 by age, gender, date of surgery, and tumor stage with 120 patients who underwent conventional DST in laparoscopic low anterior resection.

RESULTS

The robotic-assisted operative approach was used more frequently in the SST group than in the DST group (61.7 % vs. 3.3 %, p < 0.001). The mean operative time was 203.9 (range, 120-400) min for the SST group and 167.6 (range, 90-300) min for the DST group (p < 0.001). For specimen removal, the transanal approach was used in the SST group, while the transabdominal approach was used for the DST group. The pain score (visual analogue scale) of the SST group was lower (4.5 vs. 5.6, p < 0.001), although postoperative recovery was similar. Pathological examination revealed that the distal resection margin was significantly longer in the SST group (3.1 vs. 2.5 cm, p = 0.018). Postoperative morbidity including anastomotic leakage was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SST yielded equivalent short-term outcomes when compared to conventional DST and provided the advantages of minimal access and a longer distal resection margin. Therefore, SST in lower anterior resection may be a useful alternative to conventional DST.

Association between anal function and therapeutic effect after preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by intersphincteric resection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer improves local control, but can also induce severe anal dysfunction after surgery. The goal of the study was to assess the relationship of the therapeutic effect of CRT with anal function and prognosis after intersphincteric resection (ISR).

METHODS

The subjects were 37 patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent ISR with preoperative CRT. The rectal cancer regression grade (RCRG) was quantified based on histologic features of surgical specimens. The relationships of RCRG with anal function (assessed by questionnaire) and incontinence (Wexner score) were examined at 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The median Wexner scores at 12 months after stoma closure in RCRG1, -2, and -3 cases were 18.0, 7.5, and 4.5, respectively, and anal function differed significantly among these groups (p = 0.001). Four cases had local recurrence, but 5-year local recurrence rates did not differ significantly among the groups. The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 88.9, 50.8, and 50.0% and the 5-year overall survival rates were 100, 77.3, and 66.7% in RCRG1, -2, and -3 cases, respectively, with no significant differences among the groups.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative anal function is decreased when the effect of preoperative CRT is strong in patients treated with ISR.

Update and debate issues in surgical treatment of middle and low rectal cancer

Based on a review of the literature, this paper provides an update on surgical treatment of middle and low rectal cancer and discusses issues of debate surrounding that treatment. The main goal of the surgical treatment of rectal cancer is radical resection of the tumor and surrounding lymphatic tissue. Local excision of early rectal cancer can be another treatment option, in which the patient can avoid possible complications related to radical surgery. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) has been recommended for patients with cT3-4N0 or any T N+ rectal cancer because CRT shows better local control and less toxicity than adjuvant CRT. However, recent clinical trials showed promising results for local excision after neoadjuvant CRT in selected patients with low rectal cancer. In addition, the "wait and see" concept is another modality that has been reported for the management of tumors that show complete clinical remission after neoadjuvant CRT. Although radical surgery for middle and low rectal cancer is the cornerstone therapy, an ultralow anterior resection with or without intersphincteric resection (ISR) has become an alternative standard surgical method for selected patients. Many studies have reported on the oncological safety of the ISR, but few of them have addressed the issue the functional outcome. Furthermore, an abdominoperineal resection (APR) has problems with high rates of tumor perforations and positive circumferential resection margins, and those factors have contributed to its having a high rate of local recurrence and a poor survival rate for rectal cancer compared with sphincter-saving procedures. Recently, great efforts have been made to reduce these problems, and the total levator excision or the extended APR concept has emerged. Surgical management for low rectal cancer should aim to radically excise the tumor and to preserve as much of the sphincter function as possible by using multidisciplinary approaches. However, further prospective clinical trials are needed for tailored treatment of rectal cancer patients.

Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: Controversies and questions

Rectal cancers extending through the rectal wall, or involving locoregional lymph nodes (T3/4 or N1/2), have been more difficult to cure. The confines of the bony pelvis and the necessity of preserving the autonomic nerves makes surgical extirpation challenging, which accounts for the high rates of local and distant relapse in this setting. Combined multimodality treatment for rectal cancer stage II and III was recommended from National Institute of Health consensus. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation using fluoropyrimidine-based regimen prior to surgical resection has emerged as the standard of care in the United States. Optimal time of surgery after neoadjuvant treatment remained unclear and prospective randomized controlled trial is ongoing. Traditionally, 6-8 wk waiting period was commonly used. The accuracy of studies attempting to determine tumor complete response remains problematic. Currently, surgery remains the standard of care for rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiation, whereas observational management is still investigational. In this article, we outline trends and controversies associated with optimal pre-treatment staging, neoadjuvant therapies, surgery, and adjuvant therapy.

High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer surgery

In rectal cancer surgery, it is unclear whether the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) should be ligated as high as possible, at its origin, or low, below the origin of the left colic artery. We reviewed all relevant articles identified from MEDLINE databases and found that despite a trend of improved survival among patients who underwent high ligation, there is no conclusive evidence to support this. High ligation of the IMA is beneficial in that it allows for en bloc dissection of the node metastases at and around the origin of the IMA, while enabling anastomosis to be performed in the pelvis, without tension, at the time of low anterior resection. High ligation of the IMA does not represent a source of increased anastomotic leak in rectal cancer surgery and postoperative quality of life is improved by preserving the hypogastric nerve without compromising the radicality of the operation. More importantly, high ligation of the IMA improves node harvest, enabling accurate tumor staging. Although the prognosis of patients with node metastases at and around the origin of the IMA is poor, the survival rate of patients with rectal cancer may be improved by performing high ligation of the IMA combined with neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy.

Differences in tissue degeneration between preoperative chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer is administered to improve local control, but can also induce severe anal dysfunction after surgery, while preoperative chemotherapy that significantly reduces the primary lesion in rectal cancer has recently been developed. The aim of the study was to examine differences in the effects of preoperative CRT and chemotherapy on tissue degeneration of patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

The subjects were 91 patients, including 68 with rectal cancer who underwent internal sphincteric resection with (n = 47, CRT group) or without (n = 21, control group) preoperative CRT, and 23 with colorectal cancer who received preoperative FOLFOX treatment. Peripheral nerve degeneration was evaluated histopathologically using H&E-stained sections, based on karyopyknosis, disparity of the nucleus, denucleation, vacuolar or acidophilic degeneration of the cytoplasm, and adventitial neuronal changes.

RESULTS

The incidence of neural degeneration was significantly higher in the CRT group than in the control group and FOLFOX group. There were no differences in any items of neural degeneration between the FOLFOX and control groups.

CONCLUSION

CRT induced marked neural degeneration around the rectal tumor. FOLFOX treatment produced mild neural degeneration similar to that in the control group.

Patterns of failure in patients with early onset (synchronous) resectable liver metastases from rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal combination of available therapies for patients with resectable synchronous liver metastases from rectal cancer (SLMRC) is unknown, and the pattern of recurrence after resection has been poorly investigated. In this study, the authors examined recurrence patterns and survival after resection of SLMRC.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with SLMRC (disease-free interval, ≤12 months) who underwent complete resection of the rectal primary and liver metastases between 1990 and 2008 were identified from a prospective database. Demographics, tumor-related variables, and treatment-related variables were correlated with recurrence patterns. Competing risk analysis was used to determine the risk of pelvic and extrapelvic recurrence.

RESULTS

In total, 185 patients underwent complete resection of rectal primary and liver metastases. One hundred eighty patients (97%) received chemotherapy during their treatment course, and 91 patients (49%) received pelvic radiation therapy either before (N = 65; 71.4%), or after (N = 26; 28.6%) rectal resection. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 51% for the entire cohort with a median follow-up of 44 months for survivors. One hundred thirty patients (70%) developed a recurrence: Eighteen patients (10%) had recurrences in the pelvis in combination with other sites, and 7 of these (4%) had an isolated pelvic recurrence. Recurrence pattern did not correlate with survival. Competing risk analysis demonstrated that the likelihood of a pelvic recurrence was significantly lower than that of an extrapelvic recurrence (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Of the patients with SLMRC who developed recurrent disease, systemic sites were overwhelmingly more common than pelvic recurrences. The current results indicated that the selective exclusion of radiotherapy may be considered in patients who are diagnosed with simultaneous disease.

Changes in treatment of rectal cancer: increased use of low anterior resection

PURPOSE

The most common surgical procedures for patients with rectal cancer are low anterior resection (LAR) or abdominoperineal excision (APE). The aim of the present study is to evaluate and report the changes in the incidence of LAR and APE in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer over the last 15 years in a single surgical department.

METHODS

The patient sample consisted of 251 consecutive patients (mean age 65.17; age range 22-87) that underwent surgical treatment for rectal cancer in a single center from 1996 to 2010. This time frame was divided into three 5-year periods (1996-2000, 2001-2005 and 2006-2010). Patients were classified into one of the aforementioned groups, depending on the date of their treatment.

RESULTS

In the first period (1996-2000), 71 patients were treated for rectal cancer. Among them, 32.4% (n = 23) underwent an abdominoperineal excision (APE) while 56.3% (n = 40) were treated with LAR. In the second period (2001-2005), included 102 patients, from which 29.4% (n = 30) received an APE and 60.8% (n = 62) underwent a LAR for their disease. In the final period (2006-2010), from the 78 patients, only 12.8% (n = 10) of them underwent APE, while 74.3% (n = 58) were treated with LAR. There was a statistically significant (chi-square test, P = 0.005) difference between the 3 periods of time concerning the performance of LAR and APE.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of the present study, the rates of APE seem to decrease during the last 15 years, while LAR is more widely used in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer.

External coloanal anastomosis without covering stoma in low-lying rectal cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and functional outcome of external coloanal anastomosis without covering stoma in treating low-lying rectal cancer. All patients undergoing the coloanal anastomosis for low lying rectal carcer in the Department of General Surgery, Minia University Hospital, between May 2006 and May 2009 were included. Seventy two patients underwent coloanal anastomosis, and follow up was available for all patients. Mean follow up period was 12.6 ± 4.7 months. Postoperatively, fecal continence was normal in 84.7% of patients. Postoperative complications included anastomotic fistula in 3 patients (4.2%) and anastomotic stenosis in 6 patients (8.3%). There was no effect of pre or postoperative adjuvant therapy on the procedure outcome. There was no local recurrence during follow up period. Three patients died at the end of follow up period due to distant metastasis. In treatment of low-lying rectal cancer, abdominoperineal resection should be avoided if coloanal anastomosis provides similar control of the disease as it is safe and has good functional results and acceptable complication rate.

What is a safe distal resection margin in rectal cancer patients treated by low anterior resection without preoperative radiotherapy?

AIM

The aim of this study was to examine what constitutes an acceptable distal resection margin (DRM) when performing sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer without preoperative radiotherapy.

METHOD

This national study consisted of 3571 patients for whom information on DRM was available and who were radically treated by anterior resection between 1993 and 2004. Of these, 3342 (93.5%) patients had not received preoperative radiotherapy. The DRM was measured on fixed specimens.

RESULTS

The 5-year local recurrence rate was 14.5% for patients with a DRM of 0-10 mm compared to 9.6% for patients with a DRM of 11-20 mm, 8.9% for a DRM of 21-30 mm, 7.0% for a DRM of 31-40 mm, 7.7% for a DRM of 41-50 mm and 8.7% for a DRM of > 50 mm. After adjustment for other independent prognostic factors, a DRM of 0-10 mm was found to have significant impact on local recurrence. The DRM had no impact on distant metastases or overall survival.

CONCLUSION

For rectal cancer patients treated without radiotherapy, a DRM of > 10 mm is recommended.

The association between anal function and neural degeneration after preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by intersphincteric resection

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer is administered to improve local control, but it can also induce severe anal dysfunction after surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The goals of the study were to assess the influence of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on pathological findings and to examine the correlation of these findings with the cause of severe anal dysfunction after intersphincteric resection.

DESIGN

Peripheral nerve degeneration was evaluated histopathologically with the use of hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of surgical specimens after intersphincteric resection, based on karyopyknosis, vacuolar degeneration, acidophilic degeneration of cytoplasm, denucleation, and adventitial neuronal changes. Each item was scored to quantify the level of neural degeneration, and the relationship between degeneration and anal function was examined at 12 months after closure of the stoma. Anal function was assessed by questionnaire, and incontinence was evaluated based on the Wexner score.

SETTING

This study was conducted at the National Cancer Center Hospital East from 2001 to 2006.

PATIENTS

The subjects were 68 patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent intersphincteric resection with (n = 47) or without (n = 21) preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The findings in the 2 groups were compared to clarify the association between the degree of histological degeneration and postoperative anal function.

RESULTS

Neural degeneration was significantly higher in the chemoradiotherapy group, and the neural degeneration and Wexner scores had a significant correlation (P = .003, r = 0.477).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy induced marked neural degeneration around the rectal tumor. The significant correlation between the degeneration score and postoperative anal function suggests that this score may be a useful marker to predict the influence of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on anal function after surgery.

Clinical importance of surgical treatment of low rectal carcinoma in anus-preserving procedure--an analysis of 86 cases

We investigated the methods and experiences of an anus-preserving procedure in curative resection of low rectal carcinoma. Eighty-six patients with low rectal carcinoma underwent Dixon's procedure with device assistance. Patients were then observed for the effects of operation. The operation was successful in all patients. Pathologic examination of specimens revealed negative margins. Complications such as anastomotic leakage were found in 7 cases. All patients recovered well. Device assistance may contribute to the successful performance of anus-preserving procedure in low rectal carcinoma. Whether the anus can be preserved or not depends on the accurate measurement of the distal length of the rectum. A meticulous hemostasis and avoidance of tension on the stoma are key measures for avoiding anastomotic leakage.

Close distal margin and rectal cancer recurrence after sphincter-preserving rectal resection

PURPOSE

Negative surgical margins are important for local control of rectal cancer treated with sphincter-preserving surgery. However, the association of rectal cancer recurrence with close distal margin is not well established.

METHODS

Data were extracted from a prospective database of patients collected between 1991 and 2003. Included were 627 patients who underwent curative low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer 2 to 12 cm from the anal verge. Three hundred ninety-nine patients received neoadjuvant therapy, 65 received postoperative adjuvant therapy alone, and 163 were treated with surgery alone. Median follow-up was 5.8 years.

RESULTS

On multivariable analysis, overall recurrence was associated with pathologic stage, lymphovascular invasion, and distal margin. Mucosal recurrence was uncommon; only 16 events were recorded, and of those only 8 were at the initial site of isolated tumor recurrence; 7 of the 8 were surgically salvaged. On univariable analysis, mucosal recurrence was associated with close distal margin (5 vs 2% at 5 y) and lymphovascular invasion (7 vs 2%). Pelvic recurrence, other than isolated mucosal recurrence, was associated with distal location (6 vs 4% at 5 y) and lymphovascular invasion (11 vs 4%). Distal margin as a continuous variable was associated with overall recurrence (excluding isolated mucosal recurrence).

CONCLUSIONS

Close distal resection margin identifies patients with increased risk of mucosal and overall cancer recurrence. Although neither causality nor a minimally acceptable margin length can be defined, the data support the importance of achieving a clear distal resection margin in the surgical management of rectal cancer.

Damage to anal sphincter/levator ani muscles caused by operative procedure in anal sphincter-preserving operation for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Details of postoperative damage to anal sphincter tonus following sphincter-preserving operation for rectal cancer remain unclear.

METHODS

Postoperative anal tonus was measured using 3-dimensional (3D) vector manometry in 56 patients. Anal length with pressure from any direction was defined as total length (TL). Length with circular pressure (LCP), which is only measurable using 3D manometry, was also evaluated.

RESULTS

In operations associated with low anastomosis, both TL and LCP at rest were significantly shortened when compared with control (high interior resection [HAR]). In particular, degraded LCP at rest was obvious. Anal lengths in squeezing state were preserved except in cases with intersphincteric resection (ISR). Postoperative incontinence score inversely correlated with functional anal length at rest.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the sphincter muscles are mechanically preserved, function of the internal sphincter and subsequent defecatory function can be degraded in cases with operative procedures including surgical maneuvers at the pelvic floor.

Adequate length of the distal resection margin in rectal cancer: from the oncological point of view

INTRODUCTION

The distal resection margin (DRM) has been considered an important factor for the oncological outcome of rectal cancer surgery. However, the optimal distal margins required to achieve safe oncological outcome remains to be controversial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

More recently, as circumferential resection margin or mesorectal margin has been additionally reported to be more important factors predicting patient outcome than the distal mucosal margin, a re-evaluation of the impact of DRM on patient outcome is needed.

RESULTS

The extent of distal tumor spread is known to be influenced by a variety of factors such as tumor location, lymph node metastasis, and tumor size. DRM might affect survival more than a local recurrence. Because distal intramural tumor spread rarely exceeds 1 to 2 cm in most rectal cancers, and local control and survival do not seem to be compromised by shorter distal resection margins, the generally accepted practice is to aim for a 2-cm DRM. However, in the recent trend of curative resection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy, with an otherwise favorable tumor such as well-differentiated tumor and no lymph node metastasis, a DRM at < or =1 cm does not necessarily portend a poor prognosis. In cases with preoperative chemoradiotherapy, distal resection margins need to be evaluated individually.

DISCUSSION

It has been suggested that down-staging of low-lying rectal cancers after preoperative radiation might well include the pathological clearance of distal intramural microscopic spread. Moreover, the measurement of DRM varies with respective study, making it difficult to compare.

CONCLUSION

We need an applicable intraoperative method to accurately measure distal resection margin, enabling comparative outcome.

Total mesorectal excision: what are we doing?

The introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer has reduced local recurrence rates and improved oncologic outcomes, although complication rates such as anastomotic leak have also been a consequence. With the advent of neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer, many are questioning how this development may change the role of TME. This review presents a history of how TME evolved and a description of this technique. Complication rates, the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on local recurrence, variations of TME such as nerve-sparing proctectomy and cancer-specific mesorectal excision, and a review of functional outcomes for various methods of reconstruction are presented.

Clinical impact of mesorectal extranodal cancer tissue in rectal cancer: detailed pathological assessment using whole-mount sections

PURPOSE

Mesorectal cancer deposits showing no histological evidence of lymph node structure (extranodal cancer tissue) are a common feature in rectal cancer. However, optimal categorization of extranodal cancer tissue using TNM grading is not yet established. We reviewed extranodal cancer tissue in detail using whole-mount sections to clarify its clinical impact.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 214 consecutive patients with stage I-III rectal cancer. After fixation, the whole tumor mass including the mesorectum was sliced into longitudinal sections and stained. Mesorectal involvement was classified as direct tumor infiltration, lymph node involvement, or extranodal cancer tissue. Extranodal cancer tissue was classified morphologically, and its maximum size and distance from the primary tumor were measured. The clinical impact of extranodal cancer tissue was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

: A total of 498 extranodal cancer deposits were detected in 88 patients (41.1%). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis indicated that the presence of extranodal cancer tissue was an independent prognostic factor for relapse-free (P < .001) and overall survival (P = .003). The hazard ratio for extranodal cancer tissue was higher than for nodal involvement, irrespective of morphological classification. The clinical impact differed significantly with the number of histological types of extranodal cancer tissue, the number of deposits, their maximum size, and their distance from the primary tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, we have shown that extranodal cancer tissue detected by whole-mount sections has a clinical impact that is more severe than nodal involvement.

Pouch operation for rectal cancer

Many retrospective studies have found that the functional outcome after a low anterior resection for rectal cancer is better with colonic J-pouch reconstruction than with conventional straight anastomosis. This advantage was demonstrated in prospective, randomized trials and meta-analyses. However, despite its increasing popularity there are several areas of controversy about the use of the colonic J-pouch reconstruction. These issues include anastomotic leaks, the part of the colon used for the pouch, the pouch size, causes of difficulty in evacuation, indications (the optimum level of anastomosis), appropriateness for the elderly, and long-term (2 years or more after surgery) functional outcome. All relevant articles identified from MEDLINE databases were reviewed. The incidence of anastomotic leaks is apparently reduced by colonic J-pouch reconstruction. A 5-cm colonic J-pouch using the sigmoid colon increases the reservoir function without compromising evacuation, and provides better functional outcome than straight anastomosis, even 2 years or more after surgery, in patients whose anastomosis is less than 8 cm from the anal verge. Patients with ultralow anastomoses, less than 4 cm from the verge, appear to benefit the most. At a time when the indications for abdominoperineal excision appear to be reduced for low rectal cancer, the demand for colonic J-pouch reconstruction (the best technique in pouch operations) is therefore likely to increase.

Randomized clinical trials in rectal and anal cancers

This article reviews randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between April 2001 and November 2008 on the management of patients with rectal cancer. In total, the authors reviewed 78 RCTs on therapy for rectal cancer. Of these, five met the authors' criteria for level 1a evidence. The article discusses the major RCTs and relevant findings that have impacted clinical management most and includes most but not all RCTs on therapy for rectal cancer published during this period.

Oncologic outcome of intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

In 2000 we launched a prospective program of intersphincteric resection (ISR) for very low rectal cancer. In this study we compared the oncologic outcome of patients who underwent ISR with the outcome of patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR).

METHODS

The data of 202 patients with very low rectal cancer who underwent curative ISR (n = 132) or curative APR (n = 70) between 1995 and 2006 were analyzed. Patients were divided into ISR and APR groups. Survival and local recurrence were investigated in both groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 40 months in the ISR group and 57 months in the APR group. The 5-year local relapse-free survival rate was 83% in the ISR group and 80% in the APR group (p = 0.364), and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 69% in the ISR group and 63% in the APR group (p = 0.714).

CONCLUSIONS

For very low rectal cancers, ISR appears to be oncologically acceptable and can reduce the number of APRs.