Ileocecal reservoir reconstruction with physiologic function after total mesorectal cancer excision

Interposition of ileal j-pouch for rectum reconstruction in dog

BACKGROUND

The gold standard of the management of rectal cancer in the middle and lower parts is low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. About 50% of the patients undergoing this procedure might experience some complications because of the low capacity of the neorectum. The aim of this study was to evaluate ileal J-pouch interposition as a neorectum between the anal canal and the remaining colon in comparison to coloanal anastomosis and transverse coloplasty.

METHODS

Twelve dogs, weighing 23-27 kg, were divided into three groups. After laparotomy, the volume of the primary rectum was measured so that it could be compared with that of the neorectum at the end of the study. After rectal resection in Group A, the colon was directly anastomosed to the anus. In Group B, a 5-cm longitudinal incision was made 2 cm proximal to the anastomosis and was sutured transversely (coloplasty). In Group C, a 5-cm ileal J-pouch was interposed between the colon and anus. After 8 weeks, the neorectum was evaluated for volume, radiology, and pathology.

RESULTS

All the samples were alive until the end of the study. The healing of the anastomotic lines was acceptable (pathologically) in all. The mean volume expansion was 20.9% in Group A, 21.7% in Group B, and 118.2% in Group C, with the latter being significantly higher than that of the other groups (P=0.03). Colon J-pouch and coloplasty after proctectomy in some situations have not been performable. This study evaluated the performance of ileal J-pouch interposition.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that ileal J-pouch interposition might produce an acceptable reservoir function and that it seems feasible and safe in selected cases.

[Interposition of the small intestine between the colon and the rectum as a way of achieving a pelvic anastomosis without pressure]

PURPOSE

There are some circumstances in which the descending colon does not reach the pelvis to complete a colorectal anastomosis without tension. Re-establishing intestinal continuity by interposing small bowel as a bridge between the colon and the rectum could be an acceptable surgical alternative.

METHODS

We describe the interposition of one or two segments of small bowel as a way of restoring continuity of the colon and rectum in three patients in whom it was not possible to perform a colorectal anastomosis without tension due to ischaemic colon, synchronous cancer or difficulty in accessing the supramesocolic space, respectively.

RESULTS

Intestinal continuity was re-established in all patients with no significant morbidity and good intestinal function.

CONCLUSION

The interposition of small bowel segments between the colon and the rectum should be considered a valid surgical option when it is not possible to achieve a well-perfused, tension-free pelvic colorectal anastomosis.

Bridging the gap with an ileocolonic graft after extensive colorectal resections

BACKGROUND

Ileocecal interposition (ICI) for first-line reconstruction after low anterior colorectal resection was introduced by von Flüe and Harder in 1994 (Dis Colon Rectum 37:1160-1162, 1994). We report our experience using this technique to bridge colonic gaps after significant loss of bowel length.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1999 and 2009 the left-sided colon was too short for traditional isoperistaltic reconstruction in six patients treated in our hospital. Reasons for extensive bowel loss were a deficient (n = 3) or torn (n = 1) marginal artery with ischemia or repeat colorectal resections (n = 2). An ICI was done to bridge the gap and enable restoration of intestinal continuity.

RESULTS

No patient died. Whenever performing a coloanal anastomosis (4/6) a loop ileostomy was raised. One patient with colonic diversion experienced graft-related complications: ischemic colitis of the interposed colonic segment, anastomotic stenosis, and a presacral sinus were observed and managed nonoperatively. Subsequent closure of the stoma was possible in all cases. A median Vaizey incontinence score of 9 (range: 4-14) was recorded in the patient with coloanal anastomosis. The average number of bowel movements per day was 1.5 (range: 0.5-6).

CONCLUSIONS

When the descending colon does not reach the rectal stump or anal canal in reoperative cases or after vascular complication, ICI is a useful salvage procedure resulting in good bowel function.

Clinical importance of surgical treatment of low rectal carcinoma in anus-preserving procedure--an analysis of 86 cases

We investigated the methods and experiences of an anus-preserving procedure in curative resection of low rectal carcinoma. Eighty-six patients with low rectal carcinoma underwent Dixon's procedure with device assistance. Patients were then observed for the effects of operation. The operation was successful in all patients. Pathologic examination of specimens revealed negative margins. Complications such as anastomotic leakage were found in 7 cases. All patients recovered well. Device assistance may contribute to the successful performance of anus-preserving procedure in low rectal carcinoma. Whether the anus can be preserved or not depends on the accurate measurement of the distal length of the rectum. A meticulous hemostasis and avoidance of tension on the stoma are key measures for avoiding anastomotic leakage.

Prospective randomised trial comparing ileocaecal interposition and colon-J-pouch as rectal replacement after total mesorectal excision

BACKGROUND

Ileocaecal interposition (ICI) is a technique of rectal replacement after total mesorectal excision (TME), but the method has never been evaluated in a randomised fashion. We performed a randomised, controlled trial to compare ICI and colon-J-pouch (CJP) for rectal replacements after TME for rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients were enrolled into each treatment group of the trial according to the protocol. Follow-up evaluations were performed 3 months and 1 year after ileostomy closure and at a mean of 5 years after initial surgery.

RESULTS

Similar results between the groups were found for incontinence, urgency, constipation and quality of life at all follow-ups. The frequency of defecation was slightly lower in the CJP group at 3 months [3 (2-6) vs 5 (2-11) (p=0.043)] and at 1 year [3 (2-5) vs 5 (2-8) (p=0.034)]. However, this difference lost significance if patients who had postoperative radiotherapy were excluded from the analysis. Four out of the 15 patients treated with ICI experienced bowel obstruction, which required open surgery in two, endoscopic dilatation in one or maintenance of the ileostomy in one patient. None of the patients treated with CJP had similar complications.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI and CJP reconstruction result in a similar functional outcome and quality of life. As ICI did not show any benefit over CJP and tended to result in a higher frequency of defecation, it should not be used as a first choice treatment. In addition, ICI was associated with significant complications after radiotherapy. Therefore, it must not be used if postoperative radiochemotheray is intended.

The transverse coloplasty pouch

BACKGROUND

The introduction of the total mesorectal excision (TME) and the use of modern staplers have improved outcome and increased the rate of sphincter-preserving low anterior resections in rectal cancer. Consequently, the interest in functional results after rectal reservoir reconstruction increased significantly.

METHODS

A review of the current literature was conducted on the development of colon pouch procedures with a particular focus on the transverse coloplasty pouch compared with the colon J-pouch and other current techniques of reconstruction after TME such as the side-to-end anastomosis.

RESULTS

The colon J-pouch (CJP) became the "gold standard" for rectal reservoir reconstruction owing to better early functional results compared with the straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA). However, 30% of the patients with CJP faced late evacuation problems requiring the chronic use of enemas or laxatives. This rate could be decreased by shortening the limb of the CJP from 8-10 to 5-6 cm, but the late evacuation problems remained in approximately 10% of the patients. An overview of the current knowledge on technical and functional aspects as well as indications and results of the transverse coloplasty pouch (TCP) is presented.

CONCLUSION

The TCP was developed to provide early functional results comparable to the CJP while avoiding the late evacuation problems. Functional results after TCP, small colon J-pouch and side-to-end anastomosis are similar. Evacuation problems after TCP have not been reported.

H-pouch: new isoperistaltic colonic pouch for coloanal anastomosis after rectal resection for cancer: a pilot study

PURPOSE

To date, there is a consensus to consider colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis as the standard form of reconstruction after proctectomy for cancer. However, one drawback of colonic J-pouch is evacuation difficulties, which are observed at some degree in almost one-half of patients. To improve functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis, we describe a new technique of isoperistaltic colonic H-pouch.

METHODS

The functional results after construction of this pouch were assessed prospectively in ten patients and compared with those obtained in a control group of matched patients with a colonic J-pouch.

RESULTS

At six months and one year, there were no differences between both pouches for bowel function, continence score, and evacuation difficulties.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study showed that the creation of a new isoperistaltic colonic H-pouch did not improve the functional results after coloanal anastomosis compared with colonic J-pouch. Because colonic H-pouch is technically more complex to fashion, it should not be performed routinely and the J-pouch remains the benchmark for routine clinical practice.

Pouch reconstruction in the pelvis

ILEAL POUCH RECONSTRUCTION: Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the procedure of choice in mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Because the disease is cured by surgical resection, functional results, pouch survival prognosis, and disease or dysplasia control are the major determinants of success. There is controversy as to whether the IPAA should be handsewn with mucosectomy or stapled, preserving the mucosa of the anal transitional zone. Crohn's disease is a contraindication for IPAA, but long-term outcome after IPAA is similar to that for MUC in patients with indeterminate colitis who do not develop Crohn's disease. As development of dysplasia and cancer in the ileal pouch have been reported, a standardized surveillance program is mandatory in cases of MUC, FAP, and chronic pouchitis. COLONIC POUCH RECONSTRUCTION: Construction of a colonic pouch is a widely accepted technique to improve functional outcome after low or intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Several randomized studies comparing colo-pouch-anal anastomosis (CPA) with straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA) have found the pouch functionally superior. Most controlled studies cover only 1-year follow-up, but randomized studies with 2-year follow-up show similar functional results of CPA and CAA. Evacuation difficulty as initially observed was related to pouch size, and the results with smaller pouches (5-6 cm) are more favorable, showing adequate reservoir function without compromising neorectal evacuation. The transverse coloplasty pouch may offer several advantages to J-pouch reconstruction. Current series question whether the neorectal reservoir is the physiological key of the pouch, but rather the decreased motility. The major advantage reported with colonic pouch reconstruction is the lower incidence of anastomotic complications.

The colonic J-pouch in colo-anal anastomosis

Anastomosis of the colon to the anal canal is now an accepted technique in the surgical management of low and mid rectal cancers. Although significant postoperative bowel disturbance is often seen with straight colo-anal anastomosis, controversy exists over the benefit of adding a colonic pouch for low anastomoses. Several short and long-term studies have demonstrated the early functional superiority of pouch-anal over straight anastomosis. Pouch construction does not compromise anal physiological parameters. It is recommended the pouch be constructed from a length of descending colon and be small (5 cm) in size to adequately act as a neo-rectum; long-term evacuatory difficulties are encountered with the construction of large pouches (10 cm). Anastomotic complications appear to be less frequent with pouch surgery; construction of a pouch does not significantly add to operative time, patient morbidity and mortality. At present there is no compromise to long-term oncological survival. The data supporting these statements is weak and based largely upon retrospective studies. Furthermore the impact of improved function with pouch-anal anastomosis on overall quality of life has been poorly investigated. Further prospective randomized studies are required to ascertain whether the potential benefits of a colonic pouch are realized in the randomized setting.

[Construction of a neorectum after rectal excision: colonic pouches]

Rectal excision followed by low anastomosis is associated with high bowel frequency, urgency and faecal incontinence. These functional disorders results from the loss of the rectal pouch and may be also related to the damage of the anal sphincter or the loss of normal anorectal sensation. Formation of a colonic J pouch reduces the severity of the symptoms of the anterior resection syndrome mainly by decreasing bowel frequency. Creation of a J pouch may also improve the healing of coloanal anastomoses. However, there is no evidence of the role of the colonic J pouch in long term functional outcome of coloanal anastomoses. Moreover, the size of the J pouch increases with time and this may induce evacuation difficulties. Finally, the J pouch cannot be used in all patients, because of technical difficulties especially in obese men. Because the results after colonic J pouch are not perfect, new colonic pouches are developed. The caecal pouch is performed by using an ileocoecal interposition graft between the sigmoid and the anus. The transverse coloplasty is similar to that of stricturoplasty. The side-to-end coloanal anastomosis, giving a colonic blind end, is an other type of pouch. The first procedure seems technically complex with no demonstrated advantage. The second procedure is easy to construct and may be performed in all patients; however, there is a potential higher risk of leakage and functional results must be evaluated. The third procedure showed few advantages compared to a straight anastomosis.

A new surgical concept for rectal replacement after low anterior resection: the transverse coloplasty pouch

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the feasibility, safety, complication and death rates, and early functional results of the transverse coloplasty pouch procedure after low anterior rectal resection and total mesorectal excision.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The authors previously developed a novel neorectal reservoir, the transverse coloplasty pouch, in an animal model; they report the first clinical data of a prospective phase 1 study.

METHODS

Forty-one patients underwent low anterior rectal resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (n = 37) or benign pathology (n = 4). The continuity was restored with a transverse coloplasty pouch anastomosis, and the colon was defunctionalized for 3 months. Patients were followed up at 2-month intervals for functional outcome.

RESULTS

Intraoperative complications occurred in three patients (7%), none related to the transverse coloplasty pouch. There were no hospital deaths and the total complication rate was 27% (11/41); an anastomotic leakage rate of 7% was recorded. The stool frequency was 3.4 per 24 hours at 2 months follow-up and gradually decreased to 2.1 per 24 hours at 8 months. Stool dysfunctions such as stool urgency, fragmentation, and incontinence grade 1 and 2 were regularly observed until 6 months; the incidence significantly decreased thereafter. None of the patients had difficulties in pouch evacuation.

CONCLUSIONS

The transverse coloplasty pouch is a small-volume reservoir that can safely be used for reconstruction after sphincter-preserving rectal resection. The early functional outcome is favorable and can be compared to other colonic reservoirs. The concept of reducing early dysfunction seen after straight coloanal anastomosis and avoiding long-term problems of pouch evacuation is supported by this study. Future trials will compare the transverse coloplasty pouch with other techniques of restorative resections of the rectum.

Preservation of rectal function after low anterior resection with formation of a neorectum

Recent advances in surgery have enabled low rectal cancers to be resected, while at the same time restoring bowel continuity and preserving the anal sphincter. Although a permanent stoma is avoided and the operation is oncologically sound, function may be compromised. Many patients with a straight coloanal anstomosis suffer from urgency, incontinence, and bowel frequency-the so-called anterior resection syndrome. Over the last 15 years, surgical developments have aimed at improving function after restoration of bowel continuity, essentially by creating a neorectum. The best known and most widely practiced operation involves formation of a colonic J-pouch. The physiological and functional outcomes of the colonic J-pouch are discussed, along with controversies surrounding construction. Although a J-pouch improves some aspects of function, the results are not perfect. Alternatives to the colonic J-pouch are appraised, indicating future areas of development.

Experimental study of neorectal physiology after formation of a transverse coloplasty pouch

BACKGROUND

A novel transverse coloplasty pouch (TCP) with a larger neorectal volume than a straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA) but a smaller volume than a short colonic J pouch (CJP) may improve short-term function after rectal excision.

METHODS

Twelve pigs were investigated 6 weeks after complete rectal excision followed by reconstruction with a CAA, CJP or TCP. The results were compared with findings in the normal pig rectum.

RESULTS

The colonic transit times assessed by radio-opaque marker transit were 24 h for CAA, 60 h for CJP and 32 h for TCP. Non-operated control pigs had a mean transit time of 46 h. Pigs that had a CJP developed colonic dilatation and substantial faecal impaction. Colonic electrostimulation induced an adaptive relaxation in the normal rectum but a pressure increase in all neorecta, particularly after CAA. The neorectal longitudinal smooth muscle layer in pigs with a TCP was significantly thicker than that in pigs with a CAA or CJP; its thickness was closest to that of the normal pig rectum. Colonic smooth muscle layers 10 cm proximal to the coloanal anastomosis, above the neorecta, were significantly thicker after CJP than after CAA or TCP formation. No significant difference in microcirculation was observed between the three restorative procedures.

CONCLUSION

Accelerated colonic transit and a lack of adequate relaxation upon endoluminal pressure increase was associated with urgency and incontinence after CAA. Delayed colonic transit, faecal impaction and ineffective muscular hypertrophy due to pouch dilatation and constipation indicated evacuation problems after CJP construction. Functional and morphometric data for TCPs suggested almost normal defaecation. Of the three restorative procedures, the data for TCPs were most similar to those obtained in the normal pig rectum at short-term follow-up.

Clinical outcome and quality of life after gastric and distal esophagus replacement with an ileocolon interposition

Mainly because of the loss of reservoir function, loss of sphincter function, and exclusion of the duodenal route, patients who undergo gastrectomy suffer from many adverse effects postoperatively. The ileocecal interpositional graft is an attractive method to use as a gastric substitute after gastrectomy and distal esophagectomy. A pedunculated ileocecal graft is placed between the esophagus and the duodenum. The cecum acts as a reservoir while the ileocecal valve protects against enteroesophageal reflux. The duodenal passage is also preserved. Fourteen patients underwent this operation. The technique-related morbidity was low and the quality of life was good. During a mean follow-up of 6 months, no evidence of severe dumping syndrome or reflux esophagitis was observed. Further prospective randomized studies are warranted to compare this technique with the standard methods of gastric reconstruction.

Anal sphincter reconstruction by dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal resection for cancer

PURPOSE

Chronic low-frequency electrical stimulation can safely transform fatiguing muscle into fatigue-resistant muscle. This fundamental discovery was used to reconstruct the anal sphincter. Dynamic graciloplasty was found to be effective in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Our study was undertaken to investigate the oncologic, functional, and quality of life results of dynamic graciloplasty anal reconstruction after an abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma.

METHODS

Between April 1993 and April 1996, nine patients (4 males) with a median age of 51.2 (range, 29-69) years underwent an abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma (4 had a rectal adenocarcinoma and 5 had an epidermoidal anal tumor) and an anal sphincter reconstruction with electrically stimulated graciloplasty. Oncologic and functional results were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 32 (range, 14-50) months. A quality of life questionnaire was filled out by seven patients.

RESULTS

Sphincter reconstruction required the same hospitalization period as abdominoperineal resection. Two patients died from evolutive disease. Three patients were operated on twice, one for immediate colonic necrosis, two for colonic perforation after enema. One of them refused the graciloplasty and had an abdominoperineal resection. Six patients were dysfunctioned. The mean resting pressure was 24 +/- 10 mmHg, and the mean pressure during stimulation was 95 +/- 25 mmHg. Five patients were continent for solids and liquid; four wore less than three pads per day, and one wore more than three. Four patients used enemas twice a week; one patient had spontaneous evacuation. The quality of life questionnaire showed that the mean scores for social interaction, symptoms, and psychological and physical states were 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, and 2.7, respectively. The mean value was 1.5.

CONCLUSIONS

Total anorectal reconstruction with dynamic graciloplasty is an oncologically safe procedure. Functional results improve with time, but careful patient selection guarantees a successful functional outcome. Technical progress is necessary to improve the quality of life.

A novel colon pouch and its comparison with a straight coloanal and colon J-pouch--anal anastomosis: preliminary results in pigs

BACKGROUND

Early functional results after complete rectal resection and straight coloanal anastomosis are often characterized by frequent bowel movements, urgency, and varying degrees of stool incontinence. The formation of a colon reservoir improves early and long-term function. We evaluated the feasibility of a novel, modified design of a colon pouch--anal anastomosis in pigs and compared the results with those of pigs with straight coloanal anastomosis and colon J-pouch.

METHODS

Complete rectal resection followed by either a straight coloanal anastomosis, a colon J-pouch, or a novel design of a colon pouch was performed in equal numbers in 15 pigs. By transversely closing a longitudinal colotomy, the new, technically simpler pouch is formed. Functional results were assessed during a period of 6 weeks.

RESULTS

All 15 procedures were successful. The novel colon pouch required less surgical time than the colon J-pouch, and the formation of the pouches did not reduce tissue perfusion as assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry. The mean volume of the novel colon pouch was significantly smaller than the volume of the colon J-pouch. All the pigs with the novel colon pouch had normal stool frequency and consistency during a period of 6 weeks. In the group with straight coloanal anastomosis, two pigs had increased frequency of defecation, one pig showed signs of urgency and perianal dermatitis, and three had substantially reduced stool consistency. Of the four pigs with colon J-pouch, three had signs of impaired pouch evacuation and two had reduced stool frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel colon pouch is feasible in pigs and technically simpler than the colon J-pouch. These preliminary results indicate that the smaller capacity of this pouch seems sufficient for normal defecation. Its short-term functional results were better than those after reconstruction with a colon J-pouch or a straight coloanal anastomosis.

Sphincter preservation in rectal cancer. Technical considerations for coloanal anastomosis and J-pouch

Most patients with midrectal cancer undergo a sphincter-preserving operation using modern bowel stapling techniques. In patients with bulky tumors or unfavorable pelvic anatomy, however, abdominoperineal resection with permanent colostomy may be performed for technical reasons, not based on oncologic clearance needs. In addition, low-lying tumors treated initially with preoperative chemoradiation are often downstaged, increasing the opportunity for restorative procedures. Treatment by total proctectomy and peranal sutured coloanal reconstruction fulfills the need for adequate oncologic clearance and satisfactory bowel function. Sharp pelvic dissection with removal of the entire rectal mesentery, adequate mobilization of the left colon, and precise anastomotic technique are required for optimal results. Creation of a colon J-pouch increases the capacity of the reconstructed rectum and greatly reduces the time required for functional adaptation in the postoperative period. Although irregular evacuation and other minor problems can persist, permanent colostomy is avoided, and patient satisfaction is high. For cancers of the middle and distal rectum, total proctectomy with coloanal reconstruction is an important treatment option that can improve quality of life without compromising cancer treatment.

Ileocecal segment transposition does not alter whole gut transit in humans

OBJECTIVES

We have recently described a reservoir for rectal replacement after total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma. The ileocecal segment with its intact extrinsic nerve and blood supply is placed between the ascending colon and the anal canal. This reconstruction has been shown to provide good defecation quality and anorectal function. Whether gastric emptying and small as well as large bowel transit are affected by this transposition remains unclear. Our aim was to quantify whole gut transit in such patients and compare it with that of a matched group of controls.

METHODS

Gastric emptying rates and small intestinal and colonic transit times were assessed scintigraphically in 12 patients aged 46 to 87 years with ileocecal reservoir reconstruction after total mesorectal excision and compared to a sex-matched group of asymptomatic healthy volunteers of similar age. Gastric emptying rates and small intestinal and colonic transit times were calculated as described previously. Data were compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test for gastric emptying rates and small bowel transit or by analysis of variance for colonic transit; p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Gastric time for half of the meal (T50) was 161 +/- 16 minutes for patients and 201 +/- 22 for the controls. Small bowel transit time was 150 +/- 15 minutes for patients and 177 +/- 22 for the controls. Geometric center at 6 hours was 1.53 +/- 0.13 for patients and 1.27 +/- 0.16 for the controls. Geometric center at 24 hours was 2.96 +/- 0.23 for patients and 2.57 +/- 0.25 for the controls. Data are mean +/- SEM.

SUMMARY

Gastric emptying rates and small bowel transit and colonic transit times (expressed as geometric center at 6 and 24 hours) were similar in patients with ileocecal reservoir reconstruction and in a sex- and age-matched group of healthy controls. We conclude that the transposition of an ileocecal segment with intact extrinsic neurovascular supply between the sigmoid colon and the anal canal does not alter whole gut transit, not even in any of the presumably key regions.