Living related liver transplantation in adults

Understanding the living-related pediatric liver transplantation donor's decision process: A questionnaire-based retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the donor characteristics and understand the sociocultural and familial aspects of the decision to donate for living donor liver transplant.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study done in the Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology of a liver transplant centre. We enrolled the consenting donors of pediatric liver transplantation between January 2020 and January 2022. The study was conducted through an anonymized questionnaire which was drafted in a multiple-choice format. The questionnaire had three domains having questions pertaining to demographic details, donor characteristics and sociofamilial aspects of the decision-making process.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 50 donors, 23 males (46%) and 27 females (54%), with the mean age being 31.8 ± 5.6 years. Parent-to-child was the most frequent relationship (n = 39, 78%). More than half of our donors had annual income <2.5 lakh/annum or <3500 USD (n = 27, 54%). Twenty-six (52%) responders had >4 members in their family; 62% were residing in urban areas and 52% of the donors were graduates. The main source of information regarding the feasibility of living donor liver transplantation was primary physicians in 46%. Financial management was the main hurdle in 72%. Majority (74%) denied any effect on their marital relationship and 6% of donors thought that the degree of information provided to them before the transplantation regarding donation was insufficient.

CONCLUSION

Our study serves as an essential tool for health professionals to provide sufficient support to the donor. Clinical outcomes and cost must be part of the discussion between caregivers, health professionals and fund contributors.

CT volume analysis in living donor liver transplantation: accuracy of three different approaches

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective study is to compare and evaluate accuracy of three different approaches of liver volume quantification in living donor transplantations.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective study of 60 donors. The total and right lobe liver volumes were analyzed in the portal-venous phase by two independent radiologists who estimated the volumes using manual, semi-automated and automated segmentation methods. The measured right lobe liver volume was compared to the real weight of the graft after back-table examinations.

RESULTS

The mean estimated overall liver volume was 1164.4 ± 137.0 mL for manual, 1277.4 ± 190.4 mL for semi-automated and 1240.1 ± 108.5 mL for automated segmentation. The mean estimated right lobe volume was 762.0 ± 122.4 mL for manual, 792.9 ± 139.9 mL for semi-automated and 765.4 ± 132.7 mL for automated segmentation. The mean graft weight was 711.2 ± 142.9 g. The manual method better correlated with the graft weight (r = 0.730) in comparison with the semi-automated (r = 0.685) and the automated (r = 0.699) methods (p < 0.001). The mean error ratio in volume estimation by each application was 12.7 ± 16.6% for manual, 17.1 ± 17.3% for semi-automated, 14.7 ± 16.8% for automated methods. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean error ratio of the manual and the semi-automated segmentations (p = 0.017), and no statistically significant difference between the manual and the automated applications (p = 0.199).

CONCLUSION

Volume analysis application better correlates with graft weight, but there is no obvious difference between correlation coefficients of all three methods. All three modalities had an error ratio, of which the semi-automated method showed the highest value.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Volume analysis application was more accurate, but there is no drastic difference between correlation coefficients of all three methods.

A new formula for estimation of standard liver volume using liver height and thoracic width

Purpose

Precise estimation of the standard liver volume (SLV) is crucial in decision making regarding major hepatectomy and living donor liver transplantation. This study aimed to propose an accurate and efficient formula for estimating the SLV in the Korean population.

Methods

We created a regression model for SLV estimation using a data set of 230 Korean patients with healthy livers. The proposed model was cross validated using a different data set of 37 patients with healthy livers. The total liver volume (TLV), except for the volume of liver blood vessels, was measured through computed tomography volumetry as the dependent variable. Various anthropometric variables, liver height (LH), thoracic width (TW), age, and sex (0, female and 1, male) were considered as candidates for independent variables. We conducted stepwise regression analysis to identify variables to be included in the proposed model.

Results

A new formula was established; SLV = −1,275 + 9.85 × body weight (BW, kg) + 19.95 × TW (cm) + 7.401 × LH (mm). The proposed formula showed the best performance among existing formulas over the cross-validation data set.

Conclusion

The proposed formula derived using BW, TW, and LH estimated the TLV in the cross-validation data set more accurately than existing formulas.

Role of percutaneous radiological treatment in biliary complications associated with adult left lobe living donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

Biliary complications develop at a higher rate in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) compared with cadaveric liver transplantation. Almost all studies about biliary complications after LDLT were made with the right lobe. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of biliary complications developing after adult left lobe LDLT and to evaluate the efficacy of the algorithm followed in diagnosis and treatment, particularly percutaneous radiological treatment.

METHODS

A total of 2185 LDLT operations performed in our center between May 2009 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed and patients receiving left lobe LDLT were analyzed regarding biliary complications and treatments. Biliary complications were treated via percutaneous drainage under ultrasound (US) guidance, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC)/ percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). Patient demographics, ERCP procedures before percutaneous treatment, and percutaneous treatment indications were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 69 adult patients received left lobe LDLT. Biliary complications requiring endoscopic and/or percutaneous treatment developed in 28 patients (40%). Of these patients, 4 had bile leakage (14%), 20 had anastomosis stricture (72%), and 4 had both leakage and anastomosis stricture (14%). External drainage treatment under ultrasound guidance was sufficient for 2 of 4 patients with bile leakage, and these cases were accepted as minor bile leakage (7%). Overall, 26 patients underwent ERCP; of these, 8 were referred for PTC/PTBD because the guidewire and/or balloon-stent could not pass the anastomosis stricture (n=7) and common bile duct cannulation could not be obtained because of duodenal diverticulum (n=1). Diagnostic PTC was performed in 10 patients, 8 were referred after inadequate/failed ERCP procedure and two were referred directly without ERCP. Anastomosis stricture was found in 7 patients and anastomosis stricture and bile leakage in 3. In 7 patients determined to have stricture, balloon dilatation was applied and then biliary drainage was performed. In 3 patients who had leakage and anastomosis stricture, balloon dilatation was applied for stricture; after dilatation, an IEBD catheter was placed through the leakage region in 2 patients, while a covered metallic stent passing through the leakage region was placed in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Generally, ERCP is the first preferred method in biliary complications of LDLT; however, in cases where a response cannot be obtained by endoscopic treatment or require complex and/or aggressive treatment, percutaneous radiological treatment should be the treatment of choice before surgery in left lobe LDLT.

Association between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio change during living donor liver transplantation and graft survival

Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), has shown a predictive value in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, the change in the NLR during LDLT has not been fully investigated. We aimed to compare graft survival between the NLR increase and decrease during LDLT. From June 1997 to April 2019, we identified 1292 adult LDLT recipients with intraoperative NLR change. The recipients were divided according to NLR change: 103 (8.0%) in the decrease group and 1189 (92.0%) in the increase group. The primary outcome was graft failure in the first year. In addition, variables associated with NLR change during LDLT were evaluated. During 1-year follow-up, graft failure was significantly higher in the decrease group (22.3% vs. 9.1%; hazard ratio 1.87; 95% confidence interval 1.10-3.18; p = 0.02), but postoperative complications did not differ between two groups. This finding was consistent for the overall follow-up. Variables associated with NLR decrease included preoperative NLR > 4, model for end-stage liver disease score, intraoperative inotropic infusion and red blood cell transfusion, and operative duration. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model yielded similar results. NLR decrease during LDLT appeared to be independently associated with graft survival. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

The role of intraoperative ultrasonography in detection of hepatic vein variations in living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

With advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppression, liver transplantation has become the most effective treatment of acute and chronic liver failures. Evaluation of vascular anatomy and detection of hepatic vascular variations prior to surgery, especially transplantation surgery, can help reduce complications in both the donor and the recipient. Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) is known to be beneficial during planning of the transplantation surgery, and can help direct the surgery itself.

OBJECTIVES

To our knowledge, there are no existing studies that evaluate the number and diameter of segment 5 and 8 branches that need to be anastomosed with IOUS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, considering surgical anatomical evaluation as the gold standard, IOUS findings were compared to computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings. 40 patients were included in the study.

RESULTS

The average diameters of segment 8 branches that were anastomosed and not anastomosed were significantly different when measured by IOUS (p = 0.016); however, no such statistically significant difference was found in measurements made with CTA (p = 0.89).

CONCLUSION

CTA is superior to IOUS in detecting segment 5 and 8 veins draining into the middle hepatic vein. However, IOUS is more accurate in predicting which vessels are going to be anastomosed. For a complete and accurate assessment, both imaging modalities should be used to complement each other, and their respective advantages and disadvantages should be known.

Standard Liver Volume-Predicting Formulae Derived From Normal Liver Volume in Children Under 18 Years of Age

Background: Standard liver volume (SLV) is important in risk assessment for major hepatectomy. We aimed to investigate the growth patterns of normal liver volume with age and body weight (BW) and summarize formulae for calculating SLV in children. Methods: Overall, 792 Chinese children (<18 years of age) with normal liver were enrolled. Liver volumes were measured using computed tomography. Correlations between liver volume and BW, body height (BH), and body surface area (BSA) were analyzed. New SLV formulae were selected from different regression models; they were assessed by multicentral validations and were compared. Results: The growth patterns of liver volume with age (1 day-18 years) and BW (2-78 kg) were summarized. The volume grows from a median of 139 ml (111.5-153.6 in newborn) to 1180.5 ml (1043-1303.1 at 16-18 years). Liver volume was significantly correlated with BW (r = 0.95, P < 0.001), BH (r = 0.92, P < 0.001), and BSA (r = 0.96, P < 0.001). The effect of sex on liver volume increases with BW, and BW of 20 kg was identified as the optimal cutoff value. The recommended SLV formulae were BW≤20 kg: SLV = 707.12 × BSA ^1.09; BW>20 kg, males: SLV = 691.90 × BSA ^1.06; females: SLV = 663.19 × BSA ^1.04. Conclusions: We summarized the growth patterns of liver volume and provided formulae predicting SLV in Chinese children, which is useful in assessing the safety of major hepatectomies.

Small-for-size graft, small-for-size syndrome and inflow modulation in living donor liver transplantation

The extended application of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has revealed the problem of graft size mismatching called "small-for-size syndrome (SFSS)." The initial trials to resolve this problem involved increasing the procured graft size, from left to right, and even extending to include a right lobe graft. Clinical cases of living right lobe donations have been reported since then, drawing attention to the risks of increasing the liver volume procured from a living donor. However, not only other modes of increasing graft volume (GV) such as auxiliary or dual liver transplantation, but also control of the increased portal pressure caused by a small-for-size graft (SFSG), such as a porto-systemic shunt or splenectomy and optimal outflow reconstruction, have been trialed with some positive results. To establish an effective strategy for transplanting SFSG and preventing SFSS, it is essential to have precise knowledge and tactics to evaluate graft quality and GV, when performing these LDLTs with portal pressure control and good venous outflow. Thus, we reviewed the updated literature on the pathogenesis of and strategies for using SFSG.

Minimally invasive donor hepatectomy, systemic review

Liver transplantation is a life-saving therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease. Living donation is a critical source of organs throughout the world. Reducing donor morbidity and mortality is of utmost importance while maintaining access to liver transplantation for recipients. While laparoscopy was more rapidly utilized in donor nephrectomy, laparoscopy has been slower to develop for living donor hepatectomies due to the concerns about hemostasis, safety of the donor and quality of the graft. Pure minimal invasive approach has become a standard of care for left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) for pediatric recipients. In the past few years, a number of centers with significant laparoscopic and living donor experience have reported fully minimally invasive approach to hemi-hepatectomies. In this manuscript we discuss the experiences, lessons learned and path forward for laparoscopic and minimal invasive surgery(MIS) in donor hepatectomies (DH).

Improved liver function in patients with cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C virus who achieve sustained virologic response is not accompanied by increased liver volume

Background

Serum albumin level improves in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who achieve sustained virologic response (SVR) with antiviral therapy. However, it remains controversial whether liver volume increases along with SVR.

Methods

Patients with chronic HCV infection with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who achieved SVR with anti-HCV treatment from March 2003 to November 2017 were enrolled. Patients were followed up with periodic computed tomography (CT) scans to detect HCC recurrence. Patients who underwent treatment for HCC recurrence within 1 year after initiation of anti-HCV treatment were excluded. Laboratory data, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, serum albumin level, and platelet count, were collected at baseline and timepoints after treatment initiation. Liver volume was evaluated at baseline and 24 and 48 weeks after treatment initiation using a CT volume analyzer. A linear mixed-effects model was applied to analyze the chronologic change in liver volume. The correlations between changes in ALT level, albumin level, and liver volume were also evaluated.

Results

Of 108 enrolled patients, 78 had cirrhosis. Serum albumin level continued to increase through 48 weeks after treatment initiation. A significant increase in liver volume was observed only in patients without cirrhosis (P = 0.005). There was a significant correlation between ALT level decrease and albumin level increase (P = 0.018).

Conclusions

Improved liver albumin production with SVR was contributed by improved liver cell function rather than increased liver volume in patients with cirrhosis.

Comparison of liver regeneration in laparoscopic versus open right hemihepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation

Backgrounds/Aims

This study aims to compare differences between laparoscopic donor right hemihepatectomy (LDRH) and open donor right hemihepatectomy (ODRH) in the quality of the operation, postoperative complications, and liver regeneration measured via volumetry.

Methods

This study included 119 patients who underwent living donor right hemihepatectomy at Samsung Medical Center from January 2016 to December 2017. We compared several aspects of LDRH and ODRH and analyzed the results using the independent t-test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test.

Results

Among 119 enrolled patients, 66 patients (55.5%) underwent open surgery, and 53 patients (44.5%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. The mean operation time was significantly shorter for ODRH (290.57±54.04 minutes) than LDRH (312.28±53.5 minutes) (p=0.031). Estimated blood loss was significantly less in LDRH (258.49±119.99 ml) than ODRH (326.52±157.68 ml) (p=0.011). The remnant liver recovered to 83.35±10.71% of the preoperative estimate whole liver volume (pre-EWLV) in the ODRH group and 84.04±8.98% of the pre-EWLV in the LDRH group (p=0.707). The percentage of increased estimated liver volume to postoperative estimate remnant liver volume (post-ERLV) was 137.62±40.34% in the ODRH group and 130.56±36.78% in the LDRH group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.326). An analysis of postoperative complications showed no significant differences.

Conclusions

LDRH is safe, and there is no significant difference in hepatic regeneration compared with ODRH. Therefore, LDRH can be applied for living donation of liver.

Approaching treatment for immunological rejection of living-donor liver transplantation in rats

Background

The anti-immunological rejection therapy for small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) after live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) play a central role in keeping graft survival. The hepatocyte number and grafts function has undergone real-time changes with the proliferation and apoptosis of the grafts after reperfusion. Lacking an accurate and effective treatment regiments or indicators to guide the use of immunosuppressive drugs in SFS liver transplantation has made immunotherapy after SFS liver transplantation an urgent problem to be solved. Herein, we established small-for-size (SFS) and normal size liver transplantation model in rats to explore the effective indicators in guiding immunotherapy, to find an effective way for overcoming SFSS.

Methods

Lewis rats (donors) and BN rats (recipients) were used to mimic allograft liver transplantation and treated with tacrolimus. Local graft immune response was analyzed through haematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemistry. Flow cytometry was used to assess the overall immune status of recipient. The pharmacokinetics mechanism of immunosuppressive drugs was explored through detecting CYP3A2 expression at mRNA level and protein levels.

Results

The results showed the local immune reaction of SFS grafts and systemic immune responses of recipient were significantly increased compared with those in normal size grafts and their recipient at four days after liver transplantation. Regression equation was used to regulate the tacrolimus dose which not only controlled tacrolimus serum concentration effectively but alleviated liver damage and improved survival rate.

Conclusions

This study showed that AST level and tacrolimus serum concentrations are effective indicators in guiding immunotherapy. Regression equation (T_D = − 0.494T_C-0.0035AST + 260.487) based on AST and tacrolimus serum concentration can be used as a reference for adjustment of immunotherapy after SFS liver transplantation, which is applicable in clinical practice.

Impact of small-for-size liver grafts on medium-term and long-term graft survival in living donor liver transplantation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Small-for-size grafts (SFSGs) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) could optimize donor postoperative outcomes and also expand the potential donor pool. Evidence on whether SFSGs would affect medium-term and long-term recipient graft survival is lacking.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of small-for-size liver grafts on medium-term and long-term graft survival in adult to adult LDLT.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching eligible studies published before January 24, 2019 on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. The primary outcomes were 3-year and 5-year graft survival. Incidence of small-for-size syndrome and short term mortality were also extracted.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis is reported according to the guidelines of the PRISMA 2009 Statement. Seven retrospective observational studies with a total of 1821 LDLT recipients were included in the meta-analysis. SFSG is associated with significantly poorer medium-term graft survival. The pooled odds ratio for 3-year graft survival was 1.58 [95% confidence interval 1.10-2.29, P = 0.014]. On the other hand, pooled results of the studies showed that SFSG had no significant discriminatory effect on 5-year graft survival with an odds ratio of 1.31 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.97, P = 0.199). Furthermore, incidence of small-for-size syndrome detected in recipients of SFSG ranged from 0-11.4% in the included studies.

CONCLUSION

SFSG is associated with inferior medium-term but not long-term graft survival. Comparable long-term graft survival based on liver graft size shows that smaller grafts could be accepted for LDLT with appropriate flow modulatory measures. Close follow-up for graft function is warranted within 3 years after liver transplantation.

Impact of small-for-size liver grafts on medium-term and long-term graft survival in living donor liver transplantation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Small-for-size grafts (SFSGs) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) could optimize donor postoperative outcomes and also expand the potential donor pool. Evidence on whether SFSGs would affect medium-term and long-term recipient graft survival is lacking.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of small-for-size liver grafts on medium-term and long-term graft survival in adult to adult LDLT.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching eligible studies published before January 24, 2019 on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. The primary outcomes were 3-year and 5-year graft survival. Incidence of small-for-size syndrome and short term mortality were also extracted.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis is reported according to the guidelines of the PRISMA 2009 Statement. Seven retrospective observational studies with a total of 1821 LDLT recipients were included in the meta-analysis. SFSG is associated with significantly poorer medium-term graft survival. The pooled odds ratio for 3-year graft survival was 1.58 [95% confidence interval 1.10-2.29, P = 0.014]. On the other hand, pooled results of the studies showed that SFSG had no significant discriminatory effect on 5-year graft survival with an odds ratio of 1.31 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.97, P = 0.199). Furthermore, incidence of small-for-size syndrome detected in recipients of SFSG ranged from 0-11.4% in the included studies.

CONCLUSION

SFSG is associated with inferior medium-term but not long-term graft survival. Comparable long-term graft survival based on liver graft size shows that smaller grafts could be accepted for LDLT with appropriate flow modulatory measures. Close follow-up for graft function is warranted within 3 years after liver transplantation.

Splenectomy in living donor liver transplantation and risk factors of portal vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Graft inflow modulation (GIM) during adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a common strategy to avoid small-for-size syndrome, and some transplant surgeons attempt small size graft strategy with frequent GIM procedures, which are mostly performed by splenectomy, in LDLT. However, splenectomy can cause serious complications such as portal vein thrombosis and overwhelming postsplenectomy infection.

METHODS

Forty-eight adult-to-adult LDLT recipients were enrolled in this study and retrospectively reviewed. We applied the graft selection criteria, which routinely fulfill graft-to-recipient weight ratio ≥ 0.8%, and consider GIM as a backup strategy for high portal venous pressure (PVP).

RESULTS

In our current strategy of LDLT, splenectomy was performed mostly due to hepatitis C and splenic arterial aneurysms, but splenectomy for GIM was intended to only one patient (2.1%). The final PVP values ≤ 20 mmHg were achieved in all recipients, and no significant difference was observed in patient survival or postoperative clinical course based on whether splenectomy was performed or not. However, 6 of 18 patients with splenectomy (33.3%) developed postsplenectomy portal vein thrombosis (PVT), while none of the 30 patients without splenectomy developed PVT after LDLT. Splenectomy was identified as a risk factor of PVT in this study (P < 0.001). Our study revealed that a lower final PVP could be risk factor of postsplenectomy PVT.

CONCLUSIONS

Using sufficient size grafts was one of the direct solutions to control PVP, and allowed GIM to be reserved as a backup procedure. Splenectomy should be avoided as much as possible during LDLT because splenectomy was found to be a definite risk factor of PVT. In splenectomy cases with a lower final PVP, a close follow-up is required for early detection and treatment of PVT.

Factors Affecting Persistent Splenomegaly After Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using a Left Lobe

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate spleen volume (SV) and the factors influencing it after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A2LDLT) using a left lobe.

METHODS

Pretransplant computed tomography (CT) and post-transplant CT 2 years after A2LDLT were examined by volumetric analysis in 24 patients. We divided the recipients into the following 2 groups according to the post-transplant SV: >500 mL (Group A) and ≤500 mL (Group B). The factors affecting the change in post-transplant SV were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The mean pretransplant SV decreased significantly after A2LDLT. Platelet counts after living donor liver transplantation increased significantly relative to the pretransplant values. Post-transplant SV was >500 mL in 9 patients (Group A) and ≤500 mL in 15 (Group B). Pretransplant SV, platelet count, anhepatic time, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, post-transplant portal vein pressure >20 mm Hg, and post-transplant portal vein flow >250 mL/min/100 g graft weight showed significant differences between the 2 groups. Actual graft volume (GV) and GV/standard liver volume ratio showed no intergroup differences. Multivariate analysis showed that the only significant factor related to a post-transplant SV of >500 mL was the pretransplant SV. Post-transplant platelet counts were significantly increased from the pretransplant values in both Group A and Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant SV is the only significant factor predicting a SV of >500 mL after A2LDLT. However, even in patients with a SV of >500 mL, the platelet count increased significantly from the pretransplant value.

Living donor liver transplantation: looking back at my 30 years of experience

Since I moved from the National Cancer Center to Shinshu University, I have been performing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), which is the only way to save the life of patients with end-stage liver disease. In June 1990, we performed the first LDLT that case was the first successful case in Japan. The patient remains healthy and is enjoying a normal life still 28 years after the transplant. In 1993, we successfully performed adult-to-adult LDLT, which was the first successful case in the world. The patient enjoyed a normal life for 17 years until she died at 70 years of age. For small children, the left liver of adult donors is too large to close the abdomen. However, in adolescents or adults, even when the whole right liver is used, the volume of the graft is too small. The concept of the standard liver volume (SLV) has proven very important for this procedure and is calculated as follows: 706.2 × body surface area + 2.4. We proposed a method for evaluating the congestion of the liver by Doppler ultrasound. In addition, we devised the right lateral sector graft. Over the years, we have contributed to LDLT in many ways and published many papers. We feel that our findings are quite useful not only for LDLT but also for other hepatectomy procedures.

Use of Computed Tomography Volumetry to Assess Liver Weight in Patients With Cirrhosis During Evaluation Before Living-Donor Liver Transplant

OBJECTIVES

Computed tomography liver volumetry has been widely used to detect total and segmental liver volume in living-donor liver transplantation. However, use of this technique to evaluate the cirrhotic liver remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of freehand computed tomography volumetry to assess total liver volume by comparing weights of total hepatectomy specimens in patients with cirrhosis. For our analyses, we considered the density of a cirrhotic liver to be 1.1 kg/L.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Liver volume was measured using a freehand computed tomography technique in 52 patients with cirrhosis from different causes and who had no solid lesions before transplant. Measurements were made with a 16-slice multidetector computed tomography scanner (Siemens Somatom Sensation 16, Erlangen, Germany). For volumetric measurements, 10-mm-thick slices with 10-mm reconstruction intervals were preferred. Total hepatectomy weights of explant livers and computed tomography volumetry data were compared.

RESULTS

We excluded 3 cirrhotic patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome due to wide variations in scatterplot results. In the 49 patients included in the final analyses, average estimated liver volume by computed tomography was 721 ± 398 mL and actual cirrhotic liver weight was 727.8 ± 415 g. No significant differences were shown between these measurements. A simple regression analysis used to analyze correlations between estimated liver volume by computed tomography and real cirrhotic liver weight showed correlation of 0.957 (P < .001). When computed tomography liver volumetry as the independent variable and cirrhotic liver weight as dependent variable were considered, regression analyses showed R2 = 0.915.

CONCLUSIONS

Freehand computed tomography liver volumetry can be confidently used to evaluate liver volume in cirrhotic liver patients similar to use of this technique to estimate actual weights in normal livers. This technique can also be valuable during pretransplant and liver resection evaluations to ensure a more successful outcome.

Graft Dysfunction and Management in Liver Transplantation

Graft dysfunction of the liver allograft manifests across a spectrum in both timing posttransplantation and clinical presentation. This can range from mild transient abnormalities of liver tests to acute liver failure potentially leading to graft failure. The causes of graft dysfunction can be divided into those resulting in early and late graft dysfunction. Although nonspecific, liver biochemistry abnormalities are still the mainstay investigation used in monitoring for dysfunction. This article provides a summary of the main causes and management strategies for liver graft dysfunction in the early through late posttransplant stages.

Intraoperative abortion of adult living donor liver transplantation: 15 cases from 1,179 cases in 20 years of experience in a single center

Purpose

This study aimed to report intraoperative abortion of adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Methods

From June 1997 to December 2016, 1,179 adult LDLT cases were performed. 15 cases (1.3%) of intraoperative abortions in LDLT were described.

Results

Among 15 cases, 5 intraoperative abortions were donor-related, and remaining 10 cases were recipient-related. All donor-related abortions were due to unexpected steatohepatitis. Among remaining 10 recipient-related intraoperative abortions, unexpected extension of hepatocellular carcinoma was related in 5 cases. Two cases of intraoperative abortions were related to bowel inflammation, and 2 cases were associated with severe adhesion related to previous treatment. One recipient with severe pulmonary hypertension was also aborted.

Conclusion

Complete prevention of aborted LDLT is still not feasible. In this regard, further efforts to minimize intraoperative abortion are required.

A retrospective analysis of re-exploration after living donor right lobe liver transplantation: incidence, causes, outcomes, and risk factors

Despite technical difficulties, right lobe liver grafting is preferred in living donor liver transplantation because of the graft size. Re-exploration after living donor right lobe liver transplantation (LRLT) has never been separately analyzed. We aimed to analyze the incidence, causes, outcomes, and risk factors of re-exploration after LRLT. We reviewed medical records of 1016 LRLT recipients from October 2003 to July 2017 and identified recipients who underwent re-exploration within hospital stay. Separate analyses were also performed according to cause of re-exploration. The overall incidence of re-exploration was 17.0% (173/1016). The most common cause of re-exploration was bleeding (50%). Overall re-exploration was associated with clinical outcome, but different results were shown on analyses according to cause of re-exploration. Risk factors of re-exploration were underlying hepatocellular carcinoma and operative duration [Odds ratio (OR), 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-2.12; P = 0.03, and OR, 1.002; 95% CI, 1.001-1.004; P = 0.0023, respectively]. Re-exploration after LRLT is relatively common, and is strongly associated with mortality and graft failure.

Readdressing the Middle Hepatic Vein in Right Lobe Liver Donation: Triangle of Safety

For equipoising donor safety and optimal recipient outcomes, we adopted an algorithmic "triangle of safety" approach to retrieve 3 types of right lobe liver grafts (RLGs), namely, the modified extended right lobe graft (MERLG), the partial right lobe graft (PRLG), and the modified right lobe graft (MRLG). Reconstruction to achieve a single wide anterior sector outflow was ensured in all patients. We present donor and recipient outcomes based on our approach in 665 right lobe (RL) living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs) performed from January 2013 to August 2015. There were 347 patients who received a MERLG, 117 who received a PRLG, and 201 who received a MRLG. A right lobe graft (RLG) with a middle hepatic vein was retrieved only in 3 out of 18 donors with steatosis >10%. Cold ischemia time was significantly more and remnant volume was less in the MRLG group. Of the donors, 29.3% had complications (26% Clavien-Dindo grade I, II) with no statistically significant difference among the groups. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was higher in the MERLG group. There were 34 out of 39 with a graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) of <0.7% who received a MERLG with inflow modulation. Out of 4 patients who developed small-for-size syndrome in this group, 2 died. The 90-day patient survival rate was similar among different GRWRs and types of RLG. In conclusion, a selective and tailored approach for RL donor hepatectomy based on optimal functional volume and metabolic demands not only addresses the key issue of double equipoise in LDLT but also creates a safe path for extending the limits.

Comparison of Liver Graft Regeneration Between ABO-Compatible and ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was accepted as a feasible therapy for end-stage liver disease after the introduction of rituximab. The present study investigated the association between ABO incompatibility and graft regeneration in patients who underwent LDLT. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 335 adult patients who underwent elective LDLT were divided into ABO-compatible (ABOc) and ABOi LDLT groups using propensity score (PS) matching of graft regeneration-related factors. Postoperative serial changes in graft volumes were compared between the groups. The factors associated with graft volume on postoperative day (POD) 21 were investigated in patients who underwent ABOi LDLT. RESULTS In total, 300 (89.6%) patients underwent ABOc LDLT and 35 (10.4%) patients underwent ABOi LDLT. After PS matching, the ABOc and ABOi groups each included 32 paired patients. The absolute liver graft volumes on POD 21 were significantly lower in the ABOi group than those in the ABOc group in the PS-matched patients (1098.4 [964.0-1,162.0] vs. 1202.0 [1107.8-1455.2] mL; p=0.007). Major complications, including overall patient mortality during the follow-up period, did not differ between the groups. In patients who underwent ABOi LDLT, the preoperative graft volume/standard liver volume ratio and CD4+ cell level on POD 14 were independent factors related to liver graft volume on POD 21. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that ABO incompatibility could affect postoperative liver graft regeneration. Therefore, graft regeneration must be investigated using a volumetric assessment in patients who have undergone ABOi LDLT.

Graft Regeneration and Functional Recovery in Patients with Early Allograft Dysfunction After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

Background

Successful graft regeneration is important in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) because partial liver grafts are used. Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is an intermediate outcome that affects the long-term postoperative course in liver transplantation. The aim of the present study was to investigate liver graft regeneration under EAD development in LDLT.

Material/Methods

The data of 226 patients who underwent LDLT from September 2010 to July 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classified into 2 groups: one with and one without EAD. Graft regeneration, functional recovery, and long-term patient survival were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

The grafts grew more vigorously in the EAD group than in the non-EAD group, as evidenced by the larger absolute (ALV) and relative liver volumes (RLV) of the former on postoperative days (POD) 7 and 21. The median (interquartile range) RLVs of the non-EAD group versus the EAD group were as follows: 55.2 (47.9–65.8) vs. 53.7 (46.6–64.5)% preoperatively, p>0.05; 76.1 (66.9–85.7) vs. 86.7 (73.9–96.8)% on POD 7, p<0.01; 79.6 (69.3–91.2) vs. 93.7 (79.6–101.6)%, p<0.01 on POD 21. In the early postoperative period, hepatic function, measured as total bilirubin and international normalized ratio, was higher in the EAD group; however, after EAD development, graft function recovered in these patients. In the follow-up period, overall patient survival was comparable between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

The liver grafts of EAD patients steadily regenerated, such that the development of EAD did not affect long-term patient survival after LDLT.

Reference values of liver volume in Caucasian population and factors influencing liver size

PURPOSE

To investigate factors influencing liver size and to determine reference values of liver volume (LV) for healthy subjects.

METHODS

2773 volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver in the setting of the population based Study of Health in Pomerania. Based on measurement of maximum diameters in three orientations, LVs were calculated and correlated with demographic factors such as age, gender, and body mass index. In addition, LVs of healthy volunteers and participants with parenchymal liver diseases such as fatty liver disease, iron overload, fibrosis/cirrhosis were compared. Adjusted reference values of liver volumes were defined for the group of healthy participants.

RESULTS

In general, mean LV (mean ± standard deviation) was 1505 ± 385 cm³. Age, gender and body mass index correlated significantly with the liver volume (p ≤ 0.001). Parenchymal liver diseases significantly influence LV (with: 1624 ± 420 cm³, n = 1525 and without parenchymal liver diseases: 1360 ± 273 cm³; n = 1.248, p ≤ 0.001). Compared to LV of participants without liver diseases, LV was increased in volunteers with hepatic steatosis (1717 ± 419 cm³; n = 1111), liver iron overload (1558 ± 367 cm³; n = 553; p ≤ 0.001) as well as in participants with fibrosis/cirrhosis (1494 ± 459 cm³; n = 383).

CONCLUSIONS

LV is influenced by age, body mass index and parenchymal liver diseases. Reference values were established to aid in the diagnosis of parenchymal liver diseases.

Estimation of Standard Liver Volume Using CT Volume, Body Composition, and Abdominal Geometry Measurements

PURPOSE

The present study developed formulas for estimation of standard liver volume (SLV) with high accuracy for the Korean population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SLV estimation formulas were established using gender-balanced and gender-unbalanced measurements of anthropometric variables, body composition variables, and abdominal geometry of healthy Koreans (n=790). Total liver volume excluding blood volume, was measured based on CT volumetry.

RESULTS

SLV estimation formulas as preferred in various conditions of data availability were suggested in the present study. The suggested SLV estimation formulas in the present study were found superior to existing formulas, with an increased accuracy of 4.0-217.5 mL for absolute error and 0.2-18.7% for percentage of absolute error.

CONCLUSION

SLV estimation formulas using gender-balanced measurements showed better performance than those using gender-unbalanced measurements. Inclusion of body composition and abdominal geometry variables contributed to improved performance of SLV estimation.

Dual-graft adult living donor liver transplantation with ABO-incompatible graft: short-term and long-term outcomes

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) dual-graft (DG) adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) is not commonly performed due to its inherently intricate surgical technique and immunological complexity. Therefore, data are lacking on the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of ABOi DG ALDLT. We performed a retrospective study by reviewing the medical records of patients who underwent ABOi DG ALDLT between 2008 and 2014. Additionally, computed tomography volumetric analysis was conducted to assess the graft regeneration rate. The mean age of a total of 28 recipients was 50.2 ± 8.5 years, and the mean model for end-stage liver disease score was 12.2 ± 4.6. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rate was 96.4% during the mean follow-up period of 57.0 ± 22.4 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rate was 96.4%, 94.2%, and 92.0%, respectively, and no significant differences were observed between ABO-compatible (ABOc) and ABOi grafts (P = .145). The biliary complication rate showed no significant difference (P = .195) between ABOc and ABOi grafts. Regeneration rates of ABOi grafts were not significantly different from those of ABOc grafts. DG ALDLT with ABOi and ABOc graft combination seems to be a feasible option for expanding the donor pool without additional donor risks.

The correlation between preoperative volumetry and real graft weight: comparison of two volumetry programs

Purpose

Liver volumetry is a vital component in living donor liver transplantation to determine an adequate graft volume that meets the metabolic demands of the recipient and at the same time ensures donor safety. Most institutions use preoperative contrast-enhanced CT image-based software programs to estimate graft volume. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 2 liver volumetry programs (Rapidia vs. Dr. Liver) in preoperative right liver graft estimation compared with real graft weight.

Methods

Data from 215 consecutive right lobe living donors between October 2013 and August 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred seven patients were enrolled in Rapidia group and 108 patients were included in the Dr. Liver group. Estimated graft volumes generated by both software programs were compared with real graft weight measured during surgery, and further classified into minimal difference (≤15%) and big difference (>15%). Correlation coefficients and degree of difference were determined. Linear regressions were calculated and results depicted as scatterplots.

Results

Minimal difference was observed in 69.4% of cases from Dr. Liver group and big difference was seen in 44.9% of cases from Rapidia group (P = 0.035). Linear regression analysis showed positive correlation in both groups (P < 0.01). However, the correlation coefficient was better for the Dr. Liver group (R² = 0.719), than for the Rapidia group (R² = 0.688).

Conclusion

Dr. Liver can accurately predict right liver graft size better and faster than Rapidia, and can facilitate preoperative planning in living donor liver transplantation.

Risk Factors for Intractable Ascites After Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Left Lobe

Background

Intractable ascites is one of the causes of graft loss after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using a small graft. Identification of factors associated with increasing posttransplant ascites has important implications for prevention and treatment.

Methods

All 59 consecutive adult patients who underwent left lobe LDLT without portal inflow modulation between October 2002 and February 2016 were prospectively enrolled. Factors associated with the average daily amount of ascites for 2 weeks after LDLT were assessed.

Results

The median daily amount of ascites during the 2 weeks was 1052 mL (range, 52-3480 mL). Although 16 of the 59 patients developed intractable ascites, exceeding 1500 mL daily (massive ascites group), the remaining 43 patients produced less than 1500 mL of ascites daily (nonmassive ascites group). The presence of pretransplant ascites (P = 0.001), albumin (P = 0.011), albumin/globulin ratio (P = 0.026), cold ischemia time (P = 0.004), operation time (P = 0.022), and pretransplant portal vein pressure (PVP) (P = 0.047) differed significantly between the 2 groups. Neither posttransplant PVP nor portal vein flow differed between the 2 groups. The variables associated with intractable ascites that remained significant after logistic regression analysis were pretransplant PVP (P = 0.047) and cold ischemia time (P = 0.049). After appropriate fluid resuscitation for intractable ascites, 58 (98%) of the 59 recipients were discharged from hospital after removal of the indwelling drains.

Conclusions

It is important to shorten the scold ischemia time to reduce massive ascites after LDLT. Pretransplant portal hypertension is more closely associated with ascites production than posttransplant hemodynamic status.

Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Open Hepatectomy for Live Liver Donors

Objective

To document the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy in comparison with open liver resection for living donor liver transplantation.

Methods

Medline database, EMASE and Cochrane library were searched for original studies comparing laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy (LLDH) and open living donor hepatectomy (OLDH) by January 2015. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate donors’ perioperative outcomes.

Results

Nine studies met selection criteria, involving 1346 donors of whom 318 underwent LLDH and 1028 underwent OLDH. The Meta analysis demonstrated that LLDH group had less operative blood loss [patients 1346; WMD: -56.09 mL; 95%CI: -100.28-(-11.90) mL; P = 0.01], shorter hospital stay [patients 737; WMD: -1.75 d; 95%CI: -3.01-(-0.48) d; P = 0.007] but longer operative time (patients 1346; WMD: 41.05 min; 95%CI: 1.91–80.19 min; P = 0.04), compared with OLDH group. There were no significant difference in other outcomes between LLDH and OLDH groups, including overall complication, bile leakage, postoperative bleeding, pulmonary complication, wound complication, time to dietary intake and period of analgesic use.

Conclusions

LLDH appears to be a safe and effective option for LDLT. It improves donors’ perioperative outcomes as compared with OLDH.

Psychosocial Assessment of Living Organ Donors: Clinical and Ethical Considerations

This article outlines psychosocial and ethical issues to be considered when evaluating potential living organ donors. Six types of living donors are described: genetically related, emotionally related, “Good Samaritan” (both directed and nondirected), vendors, and organ exchangers. The primary domains to be assessed in the psychosocial evaluation are informed consent, motivation for donating and the decision-making process, adequacy of support (financial and social), behavioral and psychological health, and the donor-recipient relationship. Obstacles to the evaluation process include impression management, overt deception, minimization of behavioral risk factors, and cultural and language differences between the donor and the evaluator. Ethical concerns, such as the right to donate, donor autonomy, freedom from coercion, nonmaleficence and beneficence in donor selection, conflicts of interest, “reasonable” risks to donors, and recipient decision making are also explored. To fully evaluate living organ donation, studying psychosocial as well as medical outcomes is crucial.

Japanese Organ Transplant Law: A Historical Perspective

Although organ transplantation following brain death has progressed in the West, it has lagged far behind in Japan, following the first such case in 1968. As effective immunosuppressants made transplantation a better option, Japanese patients increasingly sought treatment overseas. Japanese physician groups studied issues related to transplantation but did not succeed in making brain-dead donor transplants available to patients, and the matter was referred to the government. However, transplant medicine was still marked by controversy, and as political pressure was applied the controversy deepened, splintering public opinion. At the same time, transplant groups continued working to establish structures to allow transplantation to proceed. Public awareness and knowledge of brain death grew, and acceptance widened. Eventually, legislation was passed in June 1997 that allowed organ donations from some brain-dead donors. The law is restrictive, and such organ transplants in Japan are still limited.

Size mismatch in liver transplantation

Size mismatch is an unique and inevitable but critical issue in live donor liver transplantation. Unmatched metabolic demand of recipient as well as physiologic mismatch aggravates the damage to liver graft, inevitably leading to graft failure on recipient. Also, an excessive resection of liver graft for better recipient outcome in live donor liver transplant may jeopardize the healthy donor well-being and even put donor life in danger. There is a fine balance between resected graft volume required to meet the recipient's metabolic demand and residual graft volume required for donor safety. The obvious clinical necessity of finding that balance has prompted a clinical need and promoted the improvement of knowledge and development of management strategies for size-mismatched transplants. The development of the size-matching methodology has significantly improved graft outcome and recipient survival in live donor liver transplants. On the other hand, the effect of size mismatch in cadaveric transplants has never been observed as being so pronounced. The importance of matching of the donor recipient size has been unrecognized in cadaveric liver transplant. In this review, we attempt to summarize the current most updated knowledge on the subject, particularly addressing the definition and complications of size-mismatched cadaveric liver transplant, as well as management strategies.

Small for Size and Flow (SFSF) syndrome: An alternative description for posthepatectomy liver failure

Small for Size Syndrome (SFSS) syndrome is a recognizable clinical syndrome occurring in the presence of a reduced mass of liver, which is insufficient to maintain normal liver function. A definition has yet to be fully clarified, but it is a common clinical syndrome following partial liver transplantation and extended hepatectomy, which is characterized by postoperative liver dysfunction with prolonged cholestasis and coagulopathy, portal hypertension, and ascites. So far, this syndrome has been discussed with focus on the remnant size of the liver after partial liver transplantation or extended hepatectomy. However, the current viewpoints believe that the excessive flow of portal vein for the volume of the liver parenchyma leads to over-pressure, sinusoidal endothelial damages and haemorrhage. The new hypothesis declares that in both extended hepatectomy and partial liver transplantation, progression of Small for Size Syndrome is not determined only by the "size" of the liver graft or remnant, but by the hemodynamic parameters of the hepatic circulation, especially portal vein flow. Therefore, we suggest the term "Small for Size and Flow (SFSF)" for this syndrome. We believe that it is important for liver surgeons to know the pathogenesis and manifestation of this syndrome to react early enough preventing non-reversible tissue damages.

Living-Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatic Metastasis From Meningeal Hemangiopericytoma: A Case Report

We report the case of a 58-year-old man referred to our hospital for liver tumor treatment. The patient had a history of neurosurgery for a meningeal hemangiopericytoma 16 years previously. Pre-operative imaging revealed a hypervascular tumor extending from Couinaud segment 4 to segment 8 of the liver, measuring 95 mm in diameter, indicating an atypical hepatocellular carcinoma. Because right trisectionectomy of the liver was considered to be high risk, living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was indicated. After transcatheter arterial embolization, LDLT was performed with the use of a left-lobe liver graft from the patient's son. Post-operative histological findings of the liver tumor were identical to those for meningeal hemangiopericytoma, therefore the patient was diagnosed with meningeal hemangiopericytoma that had metastasized to the liver. After LDLT, the patient had a healthy, active life for 2 years; then, a subcutaneous relapse was discovered in the left chest. The patient did not undergo any systemic chemotherapy in response to the relapse. After thoracic and orthopedic surgeries and radiotherapy for multiple metastases, the patient died 5 years and 5 months after LDLT. LDLT could be an effective treatment for localized metastatic hemangiopericytoma in the liver, but it should be indicated only for carefully selected patients.

Metabolic scaling predicts posthepatectomy liver regeneration after accounting for hepatocyte hypertrophy

We adapted a mathematical model of posthepatectomy liver regeneration using data from a subset of patients in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study. The original model addressed changes in the number of quiescent, primed, and proliferating cells. Our adapted model takes into account hypertrophy of primed and replicating cells, and it is better able to predict liver volume. In addition, by building off the hypothesis that cell cycle parameters are approximately the same across all mammals, we found that changing only a single parameter characterizing metabolic load could model liver regeneration in 5 species of mammals. In conclusion, we improved a mathematical model of liver regeneration, predicted mammalian liver regeneration based on metabolism, and found correlations between model parameters and physiological measurements from liver donors.

Liver Transplantation Is a Potential Treatment Option for Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis Patients with Dominant Hepatic Involvement: A Case Report and Analytical Review of the Literature

Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis is caused by abnormal plasma cell clones producing amyloidogenic light chains. The standard treatment is therefore chemotherapy targeting these clones, however, some patients are ineligible due to liver dysfunction. For these patients, preceding liver transplantation (LT) and following chemotherapy is a possible treatment option. We herein report a 58-year-old man with advanced hepatic AL amyloidosis who was successfully treated using this strategy. Previously reported cases treated with LT for this condition were reviewed, however, the outcomes were not favorable. We additionally investigated potential prognostic factors of this treatment approach to improve the outcome of these patients.

Living donor liver transplantation using dual grafts: Experience and lessons learned from cases worldwide

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), insufficient graft volume could result in small-for-size syndrome in recipients, whereas major liver donation predisposes the donor to a high risk of posthepatectomy liver failure. Dual graft LDLT is therefore introduced to obtain combined graft sufficiency. To date, 367 patients have been reported worldwide. We reviewed all the relevant literature, with a special focus on 43 case reports containing enough data to extract and analyze. A simple decision-making algorithm was developed. Dual graft LDLT is indicated when (1) a single donation is unacceptable due to graft-to-recipient size mismatch; (2) the future liver remnant is insufficient in the single donor after major resection; or (3) there is a significant underlying disorder or anatomical variation within the donor liver. The outcome of dual graft LDLT is reported to be comparable with that of single donor LDLT. Unilateral graft atrophy was found in 7 of the 43 patients, predominantly in the right-sided, heterotopic and initially smaller grafts. Technically, the heterotopic implantation and complex vascular reconstruction are the most demanding. Elaborate surgical planning and modification are needed. Ethical concerns about involving a second living donor need to be addressed. In conclusion, dual graft LDLT should be prudently performed in select cases by surgeons of proven expertise when single donation is unacceptable and a second living donor is available. The decision-making criteria need to be standardized. More surgical modification and clinical research are needed.

Liver transplantation as a management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide and has a poor prognosis if untreated. It is ranked the third among the causes of cancer-related death. There are multiple etiologic factors that can lead to HCC. Screening for early HCC is challenging due to the lack of well specific biomarkers. However, early diagnosis through successful screening is very important to provide cure rate. Liver transplantation (LT) did not gain wide acceptance until the mid-1980s, after the effective immunosuppression with cyclosporine became available. Orthotopic LT is the best therapeutic option for early, unresectable HCC. It is limited by both, graft shortage and the need for appropriate patient selection. It provides both, the removal of tumor and the remaining cirrhotic liver. In Milan, a prospective cohort study defined restrictive selection criteria known as Milan criteria (MC) that led to superior survival for transplant patients in comparison with any other previous experience with transplantation or other options for HCC. When transplantation occurs within the established MC, the outcomes are similar to those for nonmalignant liver disease after transplantation. The shortage of organs from deceased donors has led to the problems of long waiting times and dropouts. This has led to the adoption of extended criteria by many centers. Several measures have been taken to solve these problems including prioritization of patients with HCC, use of pretransplant adjuvant treatment, and living donor LT.

Effects of Kupffer cell inactivation on graft survival and liver regeneration after partial liver transplantation in rats

BACKGROUND

Gadolinium chloride (GdCl3) selectively inactivates Kupffer cells and protects against ischemia/reperfusion and endotoxin injury. However, the effect of Kupffer cell inactivation on liver regeneration after partial liver transplantation (PLTx) is not clear. This study was to investigate the role of GdCl3 pretreatment in graft function after PLTx, and to explore the potential mechanism involved in this process.

METHODS

PLTx (30% partial liver transplantation) was performed using Kamada's cuff technique, without hepatic artery reconstruction. Rats were randomly divided into the control low-dose (5 mg/kg) and high-dose (10 mg/kg) GdCl3 groups. Liver injury was determined by the plasma levels of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, liver regeneration by PCNA staining and BrdU uptake, apoptosis by TUNEL assay. IL-6 and p-STAT3 levels were measured by ELISA and Western blotting.

RESULTS

GdCl3 depleted Kupffer cells and decreased animal survival rates, but did not significantly affect alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase (P>0.05). GdCl3 pretreatment induced apoptosis and inhibited IL-6 overexpression and STAT3 phosphorylation after PLTx in graft tissues.

CONCLUSION

Kupffer cells may contribute to the liver regeneration after PLTx through inhibition of apoptosis and activation of the IL-6/p-STAT3 signal pathway.

Evaluation of esophagogastric varices after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using a left lobe graft

BACKGROUND

There is little information on whether living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) reduces the supply of blood to esophagogastric varices. The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of LDLT on esophagogastric varices using both endoscopy and transendoscopic microvascular Doppler sonography (EMDS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

16 LDLT recipients were enrolled in the present study. Esophagogastric varices were assessed by endoscopy before and after LDLT. Direct measurement of variceal blood velocity was performed using EMDS in 12 of the 16 patients, and portal vein pressure before and after graft implantation was measured in 10 of them.

RESULTS

The median interval between LDLT and endoscopic examination was 129 days (range 20-624). Endoscopy demonstrated improvement of esophageal varices in 15 patients and of gastric varices in 4 of 5 patients assessed. The mean blood flow velocity in esophageal varices after LDLT was significantly lower than that before LDLT (8.8 ± 3.6 vs. 0.9 ± 1.2 cm/s, p < 0.001). The mean portal vein pressure did not decrease significantly after LDLT in comparison with that before LDLT (from 25.2 ± 5.2 to 23.1 ± 3.6 mm Hg, p = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

Although portal vein pressure does not decrease immediately after left lobe LDLT, esophagogastric varices are ameliorated after a few months, and variceal blood flow velocity is reduced in almost all patients.

Intrahepatic blood flow redistribution after temporary occlusion of the middle hepatic vein during right lobe liver donation: report of a case

INTRODUCTION

One of the critical factors that influence graft function after live donor liver transplantation is the presence or absence of global or sectorial liver congestion. Many authors advocate for routine middle hepatic vein (MHV) reconstruction because it is often difficult to determine when the MHV or one of its major branches have functional significance. Predictive tests to assess hemodynamic and functional significance of the MHV and its tributaries are still under study.

CASE REPORT

We have described a novel intraoperative manipulation and Doppler ultrasonographic evaluation that led to the decision to include the MHV with the right lobe graft.

Preoperative assessment of postoperative liver function: the importance of residual liver volume

An inadequate volume of future liver remnant (FLR) remains an absolute contraindication to liver resection. FLR measurement correlates with surgical outcome and is fundamental to identify those patients that may benefit from portal vein embolization (PVE) and to assess the liver volume change following embolization. In order to minimize the risk of postoperative liver failure, preoperative analysis of FLR must be included in the surgical planning of every major liver resection. The aims of this review are to describe the use of preoperative volumetric analysis in modern liver surgery and indications for PVE.

Small-for-size syndrome in living-donor liver transplantation using a left lobe graft

In living-donor liver transplantation with a left lobe graft, which can reduce the burden on the donor compared to right lobe graft, the main problem is small-for-size (SFS) syndrome. SFS syndrome is a multifactorial disease that includes aspects related to the graft size, graft quality, recipient factors and even technical issues. The main pathophysiology of SFS syndrome is the sinusoidal microcirculatory disturbance induced by shear stress, which is caused by excessive portal inflow into the smaller graft. The donor age, the presence of steatosis of the graft and a poor recipient status are all risk factors for SFS syndrome. To resolve SFS syndrome, portal inflow modulation, splenectomy, splenic artery modulation and outflow modulation have been developed. It is important to establish strict criteria for managing SFS syndrome. Using pharmacological interventions and/or therapeutic approaches that promote liver regeneration could increase the adequate outcomes in SFS liver transplantation. Left lobe liver transplantation could be adopted in Western countries to help resolve the organ shortage.

Risk factors for acute renal injury in living donor liver transplantation: evaluation of the RIFLE criteria

Acute renal injury (ARI) is a serious complication after liver transplantation. This study investigated the usefulness of the RIFLE criteria in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and the prognostic impact of ARI after LDLT. We analyzed 200 consecutive adult LDLT patients, categorized as risk (R), injury (I), or failure (F), according to the RIFLE criteria. ARI occurred in 60.5% of patients: R-class, 23.5%; I-class, 21%; and F-class, 16%. Four patients in Group-A (normal renal function and R-class) and 26 patients in Group-B (severe ARI: I- and F-class) required renal replacement therapy (P < 0.001). Mild ARI did not affect postoperative prognosis regarding hospital mortality rate in Group A (3.2%), which was superior to that in Group B (15.8%; P = 0.0015). Fourteen patients in Group B developed chronic kidney disease (KDIGO stage 3/4). The 1-, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 96.7%, 90.6%, and 88.1% for Group A and 71.1%, 65.9%, and 59.3% for Group B, respectively (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed risk factors for severe ARI as MELD ≥ 20 [odds ratio (OR) 2.9], small-for-size graft (GW/RBW <0.7%; OR 3.1), blood loss/body weight >55 ml/kg (OR 3.7), overexposure to calcineurin inhibitor (OR 2.5), and preoperative diabetes mellitus (OR 3.2). The RIFLE criteria offer a useful predictive tool after LDLT. Severe ARI, defined beyond class-I, could have negative prognostic impact in the acute and late postoperative phases. Perioperative treatment strategies should be designed and balanced based on the risk factors for the further improvement of transplant prognosis.

Is computed tomography volumetric assessment of the liver reliable in patients with cirrhosis?

OBJECTIVES

The estimation of liver volume (LV) has been widely studied in normal liver, the density of which is considered to be equivalent to 1 kg/l. In cirrhosis, volumetric evaluation and its correlation to liver mass remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) scanning to assess LV in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Liver volume was evaluated by CT (CTLV) and correlated to the explanted liver weight (LW) in 49 patients. Liver density (LD) and its association with clinical features were analysed. Commonly used formulae for estimating LV were also evaluated. The real density of cirrhotic liver was prospectively measured in explant specimens.

RESULTS

Wide variations between CTLV (in ml) and LW (in g) were found (range: 3-748). Cirrhotic livers in patients with hepatitis B virus infection presented significantly increased LD (P = 0.001) with lower CTLV (P = 0.005). Liver volume as measured by CT was also decreased in patients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores of >15 (P = 0.023). Formulae estimating LV correlated poorly with CTLV and LW. The density of cirrhotic liver measured prospectively in 15 patients was 1.1 kg/l.

CONCLUSIONS

In cirrhotic liver, LV assessed by CT did not correspond to real LW. Liver density changed according to the aetiology and severity of liver disease. Commonly used formulae did not accurately assess LV.