Doppler estimation of portal blood flow after percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization

Long term impact of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation on hepatic morphology

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term morphologic changes occurring in the liver after TIPS creation with correlation with hepatic function to gain insight on the physiologic impact of TIPS on the liver.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent TIPS creation between 2005 and 2022 and had contrasted CT or MRI studies prior to and between 1 and 2 years post procedure. Strict exclusion criteria were applied to avoid confounding. Parenchymal volume and vessel measurements were assessed on the pre- and post-TIPS CT or MRI and MELD scores calculated.

RESULTS

Of 580 patients undergoing TIPS creation, 65 patients (mean age, 55 years; 36 males) had pre-TIPS and post-TIPS imaging meeting inclusion criteria at median 16.5 months. After TIPS, the mean MELD score increased (12.9 to 15.4; p = 0.008) and total liver volume decreased (1730 to 1432 mL; p < 0.001). However, the magnitude of volume change did not correlate with MELD change. Neither portosystemic gradient nor TIPS laterality correlated with total or lobar hepatic volume changes or MELD changes. The main portal vein diameter increased (15.0 to 18.7 mm; p < 0.001). Thrombosis of the hepatic vein used for TIPS creation resulted in a mean increase in MELD of +4.1 compared to -2.1 in patients who had a patent and normal hepatic vein (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Given lack of correlation between portosystemic gradient, hepatic atrophy, hepatic function, and TIPS laterality, the alterations in portal flow dynamics after TIPS may not be impactful to hepatic function. However, hepatic vein patency after TIPS correlated with improved hepatic function.

[Laparoscopic downstaging surgery for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: what value in two-stage hepatectomies?]

Bilobar hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer pose a problem in terms of management, with curative surgery often requiring several stages. The purpose of our study was to evaluate laparoscopic approach with portal vein ligation in the first step of two-stage hepatectomy in the treatment of patients with synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancers (SLMCRC). We conducted a single-center retrospective study from August 2016 to January 2020. It included patients with SLMCRC requiring two-stage curative surgery due to insufficient future liver remnant volume (FRL). The primary endpoint was to evaluate postoperative morbidity and mortality following first step laparoscopy at 30 days. The secondary endpoints were to evaluate conversion rate, FRL hypertrophy following laparoscopic portal vein ligation, postoperative morbidity and mortality of 2nd step of two-stage hepatectomy and finally treatment completion rate. We included six patients (4 men and 2 women) with a mean age of 64 (44-72) years. The first step of surgery consisted of a laparoscopic colonic resection associated with right portal vein ligation in 5 patients and left portal vein ligation in one patient. The postoperative morbimortality was zero. The conversion rate was zero. After portal vein ligation, 5 of the 6 patients had significantly enlarged FRL, with a mean gain in FRL volume of 59.48% (31.02%-68.71%). Two of the six patients had severe morbidity after 2nd step hepatectomy (Clavien IIIb). All patients completed the treatment.

Four-dimensional Flow MRI Assessment of Portal Hemodynamics and Hepatic Regeneration after Portal Vein Embolization

Background Percutaneous transhepatic portal vein (PV) embolization (PVE) is a standard preoperative procedure for advanced biliary cancer when the future liver remnant (FLR) is insufficient, yet the effect of this procedure on portal hemodynamics is still unclear. Purpose To assess whether four-dimensional (4D) MRI flowmetry can be used to estimate FLR volume and to identify the optimal time for this measurement. Materials and Methods This prospective single-center study enrolled consecutive adult patients with biliary cancer who underwent percutaneous transhepatic PVE for the right liver between June 2020 and November 2022. Portal hemodynamics were assessed using 4D flow MRI before PVE and within 1 day (0-day group) or 3-4 days (3-day group) after PVE. FLR volume was measured using CT before PVE and after PVE but before surgery. Blood flow changes were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and correlations with Spearman rank correlation. Results The 0-day group included 24 participants (median age, 72 years [IQR, 69-77 years]; 17 male participants), and the 3-day group included 13 participants (median age, 71 years [IQR, 68-78 years]; eight male participants). Both groups showed increased left PV (LPV) flow rate after PVE (0-day group: from median 3.72 mL/sec [IQR, 2.83-4.55 mL/sec] to 9.48 mL/sec [IQR, 8.12-10.7 mL/sec], P < .001; 3-day group: from median 3.65 mL/sec [IQR, 2.14-3.79 mL/sec] to 8.16 mL/sec [IQR, 6.82-8.98 mL/sec], P < .001). LPV flow change correlated with FLR volume change relative to the number of days from PVE to presurgery CT only in the 3-day group (ρ = 0.62, P = .02; 0-day group, P = .11). The output of the regression equation for estimating presurgery FLR volume correlated with CT-measured volume (ρ = 0.78; P = .002). Conclusion Four-dimensional flow MRI demonstrated increased blood flow in residual portal branches 3-4 days after PVE, offering insights for estimating presurgery FLR volume. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Roldán-Alzate and Oechtering in this issue.

Minimizing the risk of small-for-size syndrome after liver surgery

BACKGROUND

Primary and secondary liver tumors are not always amenable to resection due to location and size. Inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) may prevent patients from having a curative resection or may result in increased postoperative morbidity and mortality from complications related to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS).

DATA SOURCES

This comprehensive review analyzed the principles, mechanism and risk factors associated with SFSS and presented current available options in the evaluation of FLR when planning liver surgery. In addition, it provided a detailed description of specific modalities that can be used before, during or after surgery, in order to optimize the conditions for a safe resection and minimize the risk of SFSS.

RESULTS

Several methods which aim to reduce tumor burden, preserve healthy liver parenchyma, induce hypertrophy of FLR or prevent postoperative complications help minimize the risk of SFSS.

CONCLUSIONS

With those techniques the indications of radical treatment for patients with liver tumors have significantly expanded. The successful outcome depends on appropriate patient selection, the individualization and modification of interventions and the right timing of surgery.

ALPPS Versus Portal Vein Embolization for Hepatitis-related Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Changing Paradigm in Modulation of Future Liver Remnant Before Major Hepatectomy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcome of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for hepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

ALPPS has been advocated for future liver remnant (FLR) augmentation in liver metastasis or noncirrhotic liver tumors in recent years. Data on the effect of ALPPS in chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis-related HCC remained scarce.

METHODS

Data for clinicopathological details, portal hemodynamics, and oncological outcome were reviewed for ALPPS and compared with portal vein embolization (PVE). Tumor immunohistochemistry for PD-1, VEGF, and AFP was evaluated in ALPPS and compared with PVE and upfront hepatectomy (UH).

RESULTS

From 2002 to 2018, 148 patients with HCC (hepatitis B: n = 136, 92.0%) underwent FLR modulation (ALPPS, n = 46; PVE: n = 102). One patient with ALPPS and 33 patients with PVE failed to proceed to resection (resection rate: 97.8% vs 67.7%, P < 0.001). Among those who had resections, 65 patients (56.5%) had cirrhosis. ALPPS induced absolute FLR volume increment by 48.8%, or FLR estimated total liver volume ratio by 12.8% over 6 days. No difference in morbidity (20.7% vs 30.4%, P = 0.159) and mortality (6.5% vs 5.8%, P = 1.000) with PVE was observed. Chronic hepatitis and intraoperative indocyanine green clearance rate ≤39.5% favored adequate FLR hypertrophy in ALPPS. Five-year overall survival for ALPPS and PVE was 46.8% and 64.1% (P = 0.234). Tumor immunohistochemical staining showed no difference in expression of PD-1, V-EGF, and AFP between ALPPS, PVE, and UH.

CONCLUSIONS

ALPPS conferred a higher resection rate in hepatitis-related HCC with comparable short- and long-term oncological outcome with PVE.

Two-Stage Portal Vein Ligation Facilitates Liver Regeneration Safely in Rats with Liver Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Portal vein (PV) embolization is performed prior to extended hepatectomy for the damaged liver to increase future remnant liver volume and prevent postoperative liver failure. This study examined whether two-stage PV ligation (PVL) increased regeneration and hypertrophy of the future remnant liver compared to conventional PVL, and whether two-stage PVL was safe for damaged liver.

METHOD

We produced a cirrhotic liver rat model with perioperatively maintained fibrosis. Rats were divided into: Group A (70%PVL), ligation of left branch of PV; Group B (90%PVL), ligation of right and left branches of PV; and Group C (two-stage 90%PVL), two-stage PVL with left branch ligation of PV followed by right branch ligation 7 days later. To evaluate liver regeneration, liver weight ratios, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) labeling index (LI), mitotic index (MI), and TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) LI in the non-ligated caudate lobe were measured.

RESULTS

Fourteen-day survival rate was 20% in Group B but 100% in Group C. TUNEL LI differed significantly between Groups A and B at 2 and 7 days postoperatively. Weight ratios were significantly higher in Group C than in Groups A and B at 14 days postoperatively. PCNA LI and MI in the non-ligated caudate lobe decreased to preoperative levels by 7 days postoperatively in Groups A and B, but remained elevated until 14 days postoperatively in Group C.

CONCLUSION

In cirrhotic liver rats, two-stage PVL avoided the lethal liver failure seen with one-stage PVL, and significantly facilitated liver regeneration more than one-stage PVL.

Preparing for liver surgery with "Alphabet Soup": PVE, ALPPS, TAE-PVE, LVD and RL

Future liver remnant (FLR) size and function is a critical limiting factor for treatment eligibility and postoperative prognosis when considering surgical hepatectomy. Pre-operative portal vein embolization (PVE) has been proven effective in modulating FLR and now widely accepted as a standard of care. However, PVE is not always effective due to potentially inadequate augmentation of the FLR as well as tumor progression while awaiting liver growth. These concerns have prompted exploration of alternative techniques: associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), transarterial embolization-portal vein embolization (TAE-PVE), liver venous deprivation (LVD), and radiation lobectomy (RL). The article aims to review the principles and applications of PVE and these newer hepatic regenerative techniques.

Partial ALPPS versus complete ALPPS for staged hepatectomy

Background

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) can induce a stronger regenerative ability than traditional 2-stage hepatectomy (TSH). ALPPS has become popular for achieving fast hypertrophy in patients with an insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). However, ALPPS is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Partial ALPPS is a variation that may decrease the morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of ALLPS and partial ALLPS.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing partial ALPPS and complete ALPPS up to April 2019. Included studies were assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Weighted mean difference (WMD)/standard mean difference (SMD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare FLR, time interval between stages, postoperative complications, and mortality between partial and complete ALPPS.

Results

Four studies including 124 patients were included. FLR hypertrophy of partial ALPPS was comparable to complete ALPPS (p = 0.09). The time interval between stages was not different between the 2 procedures (p = 0.57). The postoperative complications rate of partial ALPPS was significantly lower than that of complete ALPPS (OR = 0.38; p = 0.03). The mortality rate of partial ALLPS (4.9%) was lower than that of complete ALLPS (18.9%), but the difference was not significant (OR = 0.37; p = 0.12).

Conclusions

Partial ALLPS is associated with similar FLR hypertrophy and time interval between stages as complete ALLPS, and a lower complication rate. Further studies are needed to examine patient selection and outcomes of the 2 procedures.

Human Liver Regeneration: An Etiology Dependent Process

Regeneration of the liver has been an interesting and well-investigated topic for many decades. This etiology and time-dependent mechanism has proven to be extremely challenging to investigate, certainly in human diseases. A reason for this challenge is found in the numerous interactions of different cell components, of which some are even only temporarily present (e.g., inflammatory cells). To orchestrate regeneration of the epithelial cells, their interaction with the non-epithelial components is of utmost importance. Hepatocytes, cholangiocytes, liver progenitor cells, and peribiliary glands have proven to be compartments of regeneration. The ductular reaction is a common denominator in virtually all liver diseases; however, it is predominantly found in late-stage hepatic and biliary diseases. Ductular reaction is an intriguing example of interplay between epithelial and non-epithelial cells and encompasses bipotential liver progenitor cells which are able to compensate for the loss of the exhausted hepatocytes and cholangiocytes in biliary and hepatocytic liver diseases. In this manuscript, we focus on the etiology-specific damage that is observed in different human diseases and how the liver regulates the regenerative response in an acute and chronic setting. Furthermore, we describe the importance of morphological keynotes in different etiologies and how spatial information is of relevance for every basic and translational research of liver regeneration.

Hepatic hypertrophy and hemodynamics of portal venous flow after percutaneous transhepatic portal embolization

Background

Percutaneous transhepatic portal embolization (PTPE) is useful for safe major hepatectomy. This study investigated the correlation between hepatic hypertrophy and hemodynamics of portal venous flow by ultrasound sonography after PTPE.

Methods

We analyzed 58 patients with PTPE, excluding those who underwent recanalization (n = 10). Using CT volumetry results 2 weeks after PTPE, the patients were stratified into a considerable hypertrophy group (CH; n = 15) with an increase rate of remnant liver volume (IR-RLV) ≥ 40% and a minimal hypertrophy group (MH; n = 33) with an IR-RLV < 40%. We investigated the hemodynamics of portal venous flow after PTPE and the favorable factors for hepatic hypertrophy.

Results

Univariate and multivariate analysis identified the indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICGR15) and increase rate of portal venous flow volume (IR-pFV) at the non-embolized lobe on day 3 after PTPE as independent favorable factors of IR-RLV. Patients with IR-pFV on day 3 after PTPE ≥100% and ICGR15 ≤ 15% (n = 13) exhibited significantly increased IR-RLV compared with others (n = 35).

Conclusions

Cases with high IR-pFV on day 3 after PTPE exhibited better hepatic hypertrophy. Preserved liver function and increased portal venous flow on day 3 were important.

Portal vein ligation versus portal vein embolization for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant: A systematic review and meta-analysis

An important risk of major hepatic resection is postoperative liver failure, which is directly related to insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). Portal vein embolization (PVE) and portal vein ligation (PVL) can minimize this risk by inducing hypertrophy of the FLR. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of PVE and PVL for FLR hypertrophy. A systematic search was conducted on the17^th of January 2017. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Oxford Critical Appraisal Skills Program for cohort studies. The primary endpoint was the relative rate of hypertrophy of the FLR. Number of cancelled hepatic resection and postoperative morbidity and mortality were secondary endpoints. For meta-analysis, the pooled hypertrophy rate was calculated for each intervention. The literature search identified 21 eligible studies with 1953 PVE and 123 PVL patients. All studies were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences were found regarding the rate of FLR hypertrophy (PVE 43.2%, PVL 38.5%, p = 0.39). The number of cancelled hepatic resections due to inadequate hypertrophy was significantly lower after PVL (p = 0.002). No differences were found in post-intervention mortality and morbidity. This meta-analysis demonstrated no significant differences in safety and rate of FLR hypertrophy between PVE and PVL. PVE should be considered as the preferred strategy, since it is a minimally invasive procedure. However, during a two-stage procedure, PVL can be performed with expected comparable outcome as PVE.

Other non-surgical treatments for liver cancer

Interventional radiology plays a major role in the modern management of liver cancers, in primary hepatic malignancies or metastases and in palliative or curative situations. Radiological treatments are divided in two categories based on their approach: endovascular treatment and direct transcapsular access. Endovascular treatments include mainly three applications: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and portal vein embolization (PVE). TACE and TARE share an endovascular arterial approach, consisting of a selective catheterization of the hepatic artery or its branches. Subsequently, either a chemotherapy (TACE) or radioembolic (TARE) agent is injected in the target vessel to act on the tumor. PVE raises the volume of the future liver remnant in extended hepatectomy by embolizing a portal vein territory which results in hepatic regeneration. Direct transcapsular access treatments involve mainly three techniques: radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA), microwave thermal ablation (MWA) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI). RFA and MWA procedures are almost identical, their clinical applications are similar. A probe is deployed directly into the tumor to generate heat and coagulation necrosis. PEI has known implications based on the chemical toxicity of intra-tumoral injection with highly concentrated alcohol by a thin needle.

Impact of split completeness on future liver remnant hypertrophy in associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma: Complete-ALPPS versus partial-ALPPS

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggested that associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy with a partial split could effectively induce the same degree of future liver remnant hypertrophy as a complete split in non-cirrhotic and non-cholestatic livers with better postoperative safety profiles. Our aim was to evaluate if the same phenomenon could be applied to hepatitis-related chronic liver diseases.

METHODS

In the study, 25 patients who underwent associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy from October 2013 to January 2016 for hepatocellular carcinoma were analyzed. Partial-associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (n = 12) was defined as 50-80% of the transection surface split and complete-associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (n = 13) was split down to inferior vena cava. Perioperative outcomes stratified by split completeness were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in operating times and blood loss for stage I and II operations between complete-associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy and partial-associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. All patients underwent stage II operation without any inter-stage complications. Complete split induced greater future liver remnant hypertrophy than partial split (hypertrophy rate: 31.2 vs 17.5 mL/day, P = .022) with more pronounced effect in chronic hepatitis (P = .007) than cirrhosis (P = .283). Complete-associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy was more likely to attain a future liver remnant/estimated standard liver volume ratio >35% within 10 days (76.9% vs 33.3%, P = .024) and proceed to stage II within 14 days after stage I (100% vs 58.4%, P = .009). The overall postoperative morbidity (≥grade 3a) after stage II was 16% (complete versus partial split: 7.7% vs 25%, P = .238) and hospital mortality after stage II was 8% (complete versus partial split: 0% vs 16.7%, P = .125).

CONCLUSION

Complete-associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy induced more rapid future liver remnant hypertrophy than partial-associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy without increased perioperative risk in chronic liver diseases.

Limits of and Complications after Embolization of the Hepatic Artery and Portal Vein to Induce Segmental Hypertrophy of the Liver: A Large Mini-Pig Study

Background: The aim of this study was to compare arterial embolization (AE) with portal vein embolization (PVE) for the induction of segmental hypertrophy regarding procedural efficacy, safety and outcome. Methods: A total of 29 mini pigs were subjected to PVE, AE or assigned to the sham (SO) group. Correspondingly, 75% of the hepatic artery or portal vein branches were embolized. Growth and atrophy of the liver lobes, calculating the liver-to-body weight index (LBWI), laboratory data, arteriography, portography, Doppler ultrasound (US) and histopathology were analyzed. Results: After PVE, 2 animals had to be excluded due to technical problems. After AE, 4 animals had to be excluded because of technical problems and early sacrifice. Postprocedural US demonstrated effective AE and PVE of the respective lobes. Four weeks after PVE, portography showed a slow refilling of the embolized lobe by collateral portal venous vessels. Four weeks after AE, arteriography revealed a slight revascularization of the embolized lobes by arterial neovascularization. Segmental AE led to extensive necrotic and inflammatory alterations in the liver and bile duct parenchyma. Significant hypertrophy of the non-embolized lobe was only noted in the PVE group (LBWI: 0.91 ± 0.28%; p = 0.001). There was no increase in the non-embolized lobe in the AE (LBWI: 0.45 ± 0.087%) and SO group (LBWI: 0.45 ± 0.13%). Conclusion: PVE is safe and effective to induce segmental hypertrophy. Portal reperfusion by collateral vessels may limit hypertrophy. AE did not increase the segmental hepatic volume but carries the risk of extensive necrotic inflammatory damage.

Portal vein embolization for induction of selective hepatic hypertrophy prior to major hepatectomy: rationale, techniques, outcomes and future directions

The ability to modulate the future liver remnant (FLR) is a key component of modern oncologic hepatobiliary surgery practice and has extended surgical candidacy for patients who may have been previously thought unable to survive liver resection. Multiple techniques have been developed to augment the FLR including portal vein embolization (PVE), associating liver partition and portal vein ligation (ALPPS), and the recently reported transhepatic liver venous deprivation (LVD). PVE is a well-established means to improve the safety of liver resection by redirecting blood flow to the FLR in an effort to selectively hypertrophy and ultimately improve functional reserve of the FLR. This article discusses the current practice of PVE with focus on summarizing the large number of published reports from which outcomes based practices have been developed. Both technical aspects of PVE including volumetry, approaches, and embolization agents; and clinical aspects of PVE including data supporting indications, and its role in conjunction with chemotherapy and transarterial embolization will be highlighted. PVE remains an important aspect of oncologic care; in large part due to the substantial foundation of information available demonstrating its clear clinical benefit for hepatic resection candidates with small anticipated FLRs.

Portal vein embolization using absolute ethanol: evaluation of its safety and efficacy

BACKGROUND

Previously, we reported on the clinical efficacy and safety of portal vein embolization (PVE) with fibrin glue. Our embolic materials for PVE changed from fibrin glue to absolute ethanol (EOH) after 2001 due to prohibition of using fibrin glue for PVE. With introducing our technique of PVE with EOH, we evaluated its safety and efficacy with attention to the amount of EOH.

METHODS

The medical records of 154 patients who underwent PVE using EOH were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Changes with time in both the serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) after PVE returned to the initial condition within 7 days after PVE. In the 96 patients who underwent CT volumerty 14 to 21 days after PVE, the volume of the embolized lobe decreased from 701 ± 165 cm(3) to 549 ± 148 cm(3) (P < 0.0001). Meanwhile, the volume of the non-embolized lobe increased from 388 ± 105 cm(3) to 481 ± 113 cm(3) (P < 0.0001). On simple linear regression, the amount of EOH was positively correlated with both the maximum of AST and that of ALT after PVE; however, it never correlated with changes in liver volume after PVE.

CONCLUSIONS

Portal vein embolization with EOH has a substantial effect on both hypertrophy of the non-embolized lobe and atrophy of the embolized lobe. Quick recoveries of changes with time in AST and ALT after PVE proved that PVE with EOH is a safe procedure. The amount of EOH affected the extent of liver damage but had no clinical effects on changes in liver volume after PVE.

Simultaneous biliary drainage and portal vein embolization before extended hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: preliminary experience

BACKGROUND

Patients with resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma often present obstructive jaundice and a small future remnant liver (FRL) ratio. A sequential approach comprising preoperative biliary drainage followed by portal vein embolization (PVE) is usually performed but leads to long preoperative management (6-12 weeks) before patients can undergo resection. To simplify and shorten this phase of liver preparation, we developed a new preoperative approach that involves percutaneous biliary drainage and PVE during the same procedure. We report the outcomes of this combined procedure.

METHODS

During 1 year, four patients underwent simultaneous biliary drainage and PVE followed 1 month later by surgical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Liver volumes were assessed by CT before, and 1, and 3 months after the combined procedure. Serum liver enzymes were assessed before and 1 month after the combined procedure.

RESULTS

The combined procedure was feasible in all cases, with no related complications. After the combined procedure, transaminases remained stable or decreased, whereas gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin decreased. During the first month, the left lobe volume increased by +27.9 % (range 19-40.9 %). The FRL ratio increased from 24.9 to 33.2 %. All patients underwent R0 liver resection with a favorable postoperative outcome. The remnant liver volume increased by +132 % (range 78-245 %) between 1 and 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous percutaneous biliary drainage and PVE is feasible. This all-in-one preoperative approach greatly decreases waiting time until surgical resection. These encouraging results warrant further investigation to confirm the safety and to evaluate the reduction in the dropout rate for liver resection in this tumor with poor prognosis.

Portal vein embolization: rationale, technique, and current application

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is a technique used before hepatic resection to increase the size of liver segments that will remain after surgery. This therapy redirects portal blood to segments of the future liver remnant (FLR), resulting in hypertrophy. PVE is indicated when the FLR is either too small to support essential function or marginal in size and associated with a complicated postoperative course. When appropriately applied, PVE has been shown to reduce postoperative morbidity and increase the number of patients eligible for curative intent resection. PVE is also being combined with other therapies in novel ways to improve surgical outcomes. This article reviews the rationale, technical considerations, and current use of preoperative PVE.

Intrahepatic left to right portoportal venous collateral vascular formation in patients undergoing right portal vein ligation

PURPOSE

We investigated intrahepatic vascular changes in patients undergoing right portal vein ligation (PVL) or portal vein embolization (PVE) in conjunction with the ensuing hypertrophic response and function of the left liver lobe.

METHODS

Between December 2008 and October 2011, 7 patients underwent right PVL and 14 patients PVE. Computed tomographic (CT) volumetry to assess future remnant liver (FRL) and functional hepatobiliary scintigraphy were performed in all patients before and 3 weeks after portal vein occlusion. In 18 patients an intraoperative portography was performed to assess perfusion through the occluded portal branches.

RESULTS

In all patients after initially successful PVL, reperfused portal veins were observed on CT scan 3 weeks after portal occlusion. This was confirmed in all cases during intraoperative portography. Intrahepatic portoportal collaterals were identified in all patients in the PVL group and in one patient in the PVE group. In all other PVE patients, complete occlusion of the embolized portal branches was observed on CT scan and on intraoperative portography. The median increase of FRL volume after PVE was 41.6 % (range 10-305 %), and after PVL was only 8.1 % (range 0-102 %) (p = 0.179). There were no differences in FRL function between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PVE and PVL are both methods to induce hypertrophy of the FRL in anticipation of major liver resection. Compared to PVE, PVL seems less efficient in inducing hypertrophy of the nonoccluded left lobe. This could be caused by the formation of intrahepatic portoportal neocollateral vessels, through which the ligated portal branches are reperfused within 3 weeks.

Update on portal vein embolization: evidence-based outcomes, controversies, and novel strategies

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is an established therapy used to redirect portal blood flow away from the tumor-bearing liver to the anticipated future liver remnant (FLR) and usually results in FLR hypertrophy. PVE is indicated when the FLR is considered too small before surgery to support essential function after surgery. When appropriately applied, PVE reduces postoperative morbidity and increases the number of patients eligible for curative hepatic resection. PVE also has been combined with other therapies to improve patient outcomes. This article assesses more recent outcomes data regarding PVE, reviews the existing controversies, and reports on novel strategies currently being investigated.

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a surgeon's viewpoint on current topics

Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas are defined anatomically as "tumors that are located in the extrahepatic biliary tree proximal to the origin of the cystic duct". However, as the boundary between the extrahepatic and intrahepatic bile ducts is not well defined, perihilar cholangiocarcinomas potentially include two types of tumors: one is the "extrahepatic" type, which arises from the large hilar bile duct, and the other is the "intrahepatic" type, which has an intrahepatic component with the invasion of the hepatic hilus. The new TNM staging system published by the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) has been well revised with regard to perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, but it still lacks stratification of patient prognosis and has little applicability for assessing the feasibility of surgical treatment; therefore, further refinement is essential. Most patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinomas present with jaundice, and preoperative biliary drainage is mandatory. Previously, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was used in many centers; however, it is accepted that endoscopic naso-biliary drainage is the most suitable method of preoperative drainage. Portal vein embolization is now widely used as a presurgical treatment for patients undergoing an extended hepatectomy to minimize postoperative liver dysfunction. The surgical resection of a perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is technically demanding and continues to be the most difficult challenge for hepatobiliary surgeons. Because of advances in diagnostic and surgical techniques, surgical outcomes and survival rates after resection have steadily improved. However, survival, especially for patients with lymph node metastasis, is still unsatisfactory, and the establishment of adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary. Further synergy of endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and surgeons is required to conquer this intractable disease.

Sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: the university of Tokyo experience

When undertaking portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the following possibilities should be considered: (1) failure to induce hypertrophy of the nonembolized segments due to the underlying liver disease, (2) acceleration of tumor growth by occlusion of the portal venous flow because HCC is a hypervascular tumor fed exclusively by hepatic arterial flow, and (3) poor efficacy of PVE due to the presence of arterioportal shunts frequently observed in cases of liver cirrhosis and HCC. With these in mind, we performed sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and PVE in 45 patients with HCC undergoing major liver resection. This double preparation was well tolerated, enhanced the hypertrophy process in the nonembolized segments, and suppressed the tumor growth during the preparation period. Furthermore, PVE also functioned as a preoperative test to select patients for major liver resection. Sequential TACE and PVE is an effective preoperative intervention in patients with HCC scheduled for major liver resection.

Strategies for resection using portal vein embolization: hepatocellular carcinoma and hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is increasingly used to optimize the volume and function of the future liver remnant (FLR) and to reduce the risk for complications of major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). In patients with HCC who are candidates for extended hepatectomy and in patients with HCC and well-compensated cirrhosis who are being considered for major hepatectomy, FLR volumetry is routinely performed, and PVE is employed in selected cases to optimize the volume and function of the FLR prior to surgery. Similarly, in patients with hilar CCA who are candidates for extended hepatectomy, careful preoperative preparation using biliary drainage, FLR volumetry, and PVE optimizes the volume and function of the FLR prior to surgery. Appropriate use of PVE has led to improved postoperative outcomes after major hepatectomy for these diseases and oncological outcomes similar to those in patients who undergo resection without PVE. Specific indications for PVE are being clarified. FLR volumetry is necessary for proper selection of patients for PVE. Analysis of the degree of hypertrophy of the FLR after PVE (a dynamic test of liver regeneration) complements analysis of the pre-PVE FLR volume (a static test). Together, FLR degree of hypertrophy and FLR volume are the best predictors of outcome after major hepatectomy in an individual patient, regardless of the degree of underlying liver disease. This article synthesizes the literature on the approach to patients with HCC and CCA who are candidates for major hepatectomy. The rationale and indications for FLR volumetry and PVE and outcomes following PVE and major hepatectomy for HCC and CCA are discussed.

Selective portal vein ligation and embolization induce different tumoral responses in the rat liver

BACKGROUND

Portal vein ligation (PVL) and portal vein embolization (PVE) are used to enhance liver volume before hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis (LM). Impact of such techniques on tumor growth is not well known. This experimental study aimed to assess impact of PVE and PVL on LM growth in a murine model of colorectal LM.

METHODS

Single macroscopic tumor was induced by injection of 0.5 × 10(6) DHD/K12 cells under the liver capsule of BDIX rats at day 0. Multiple microscopic tumors were obtained by intra-portal injection of 1 × 10(6) cells at day 7. At day 8, rats were divided in 3 groups: PVE group (selective 70% PVE), PVL group (selective 70% PVL); control group (sham laparotomy). Rats were sacrificed at day 37 (11 in PVE, 12 in PVL, and 10 rats in control groups). Liver volume and LM volumes were assessed.

RESULTS

Nonoccluded liver volume was larger in the PVE and PVL groups vs control group (P < .0001 and P < .0001, respectively) but showed no difference in PVE vs PVL groups (P = .08). LM volume in the occluded liver was smaller in the PVE vs control groups (P = .006) and larger in the PVL vs control groups (P = .001). LM volume in the nonoccluded liver was larger in the PVE and PVL groups vs control group (P = .010 and P = .010, respectively) but showed no difference in PVE vs PVL groups (P= .878).

CONCLUSION

Both PVL and PVE modify tumor growth, especially in nonoccluded lobe. These results could be of clinical importance in humans where both techniques are widely used.

Portal vein embolization: rationale, outcomes, controversies and future directions

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is now considered the standard of care to improve safety for patients undergoing extensive hepatectomy with an anticipated small future liver remnant (FLR). PVE is used to induce contralateral liver hypertrophy in preparation for major liver resection. Optimal patient selection is essential to maximize the clinical benefits of PVE. Computed tomography volumetry is used to calculate a standardized FLR and determine the need for preoperative PVE. Percutaneous PVE can be performed via the transhepatic ipsilateral or contralateral approaches, depending on operator preference. Several different embolic agents are available to the interventional radiologist, all with similar effectiveness in inducing hypertrophy. When an extended hepatectomy is planned, right PVE should include segment 4, in order to maximize FLR hypertrophy. Multiple studies have demonstrated the beneficial outcomes of PVE in both patients with healthy livers and with underlying liver diseases. Novel improvements to PVE should expand its scope to patients who were previously not candidates for the procedure.

Uses and limitations of portal vein embolization for improving perioperative outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatic resection remains the only curative option for the majority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who do not meet criteria for transplantation or local ablative options. As the majority of patients with HCC also have underlying chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, post-hepatectomy complications can be significant, and in some prohibitive. The technique of portal vein embolization (PVE) has evolved to increase the candidacy of patients for major hepatectomy, as well as improve postoperative outcomes and safety. This review will focus on PVE and discuss our institution's experience with uses and limitations of this technique for HCC.

Clinicopathological study of patients undergoing resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Of the patients who underwent resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, those who received palliative surgery, or could not be followed up clinicopathologically, were excluded from this study. In the remaining 37 patients, the cumulative postoperative survival rate (simply referred to as the cumulative survival rate below) was analyzed according to gross types, histopathological parameters, final stages, and final curability. These patients showed a 5-year survival rate of 17.7% and a 50% survival of 2.2 years. By gross type, patients with a localized papillary or nodular expansion type tended to have a better survival rate than those with an invasive papillary or nodular expansion type. A greater histological depth of invasion tended to be associated with a poorer prognosis: the s(-) group, that is, a group of patients without serosal exposure of cancer (invasion depths of m, fm, and ss) had a significantly better prognosis than the s(+) group, a group of patients with serosal exposure of cancer (invasion depths of se and si). Other histopathological parameters, such as ly, pn, pHinf, pHM, and pEM, were associated with significant prognostic differences. By final stage, the stage I/II group and stage III or higher group showed a particularly significant difference in prognosis. By final curability, the curability A/B group had a significantly better prognosis than the curability C group. Taken together, surgery providing curability A and B promises a good long-term prognosis. Therefore, it is important that efforts are made to detect cancer early, adequately evaluate the degree of cancer extension, and determine the extent of resection and the surgical technique.

Comparative study of portal vein embolization versus portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant using a mini-pig model

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The extent of hepatectomies is limited by the functional reserve of the remnant liver. The introduction of preoperative portal vein occlusion techniques to induce a preoperative hyperplasia of the future liver remnant has reduced the risk of postoperative liver failure. However, it has remained a matter of debate whether partial portal vein embolization (PVE) or suture ligation of the portal branches during exploration is the preferred technique. We compared both techniques under standardized experimental conditions in a large animal model by means of effectiveness and pathophysiologic differences.

METHODS

Thirteen mini-pigs underwent portal vein ligation (PVL), 11 mini-pigs underwent PVE of 75% of the liver volume, and 6 underwent a sham operation. The animals were killed after 28 days. Laboratory liver function and damage parameters, lobar liver-to-body weight indices, portal and arterial flow alterations, and histologic changes were assessed. Ex situ arteriograms and portograms were performed to examine adaptive changes in the macroarchitecture of both vascular systems.

RESULTS

The liver-to-body weight index of the nonoccluded lobe was highest after PVE (0.85) versus 0.6 (P < 0.05) after PVL. There was no significant reduction in global serum parameters reflecting total liver function. After 4 weeks, the PVL group consistently exhibited hepatopetal portal flow in the ligated lobes, which was present but significantly decreased after PVE. The ex situ angiography after PVE and PVL revealed the development of portal neocollaterals in the portal-occluded liver parts.

CONCLUSIONS

Both PVL and PVE are able to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. In comparison, PVE is the more effective technique to increase the future liver remnant. This is due to a more effective, durable occlusion of the portal branches. Formation of collaterals between occluded and nonoccluded liver parts seems to be the cause of inferior regeneration in the ligation group.

Right portal vein ligation is as efficient as portal vein embolization to induce hypertrophy of the left liver remnant

BACKGROUND

Aim of this retrospective study was to compare induction of left liver hypertrophy after right portal vein ligation (PVL) and right portal vein embolization (PVE) before right hepatectomy for liver metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1998 and 2005, 18 patients underwent a PVE, whereas 17 patients underwent a PVL during a first stage laparotomy.

RESULTS

There was no complication related to PVE or PVL. After a similar interval time (7 +/- 3 vs 8 +/- 3 weeks), the increase of the left liver volume was similar between the two groups (35 +/- 38 vs 38 +/- 26%). After PVE and PVL, right hepatectomy was performed in 12 and 14 patients, respectively. Technical difficulties during the right hepatectomy were similar according to duration of procedure (6.4 +/- 1 vs 6.7 +/- 1 h, p = 0.7) and transfusion rates (33 vs 28%, p = 0.7). Mortality was nil in both groups, and morbidity rates were respectively 58% for the PVE group and 36% for the PVL group (p = 0.6).

CONCLUSION

Right PVL and PVE result in a comparable hypertrophy of the left liver. During the first laparotomy of a two-step liver resection, PVL can be efficiently and safely performed.

Which Gender is Better Positioned in the Process of Liver Surgery? Male or Female?

Liver surgery is a process which induces various types of stress on the liver including the total occlusion of the blood inflow, hemorrhage, massive volume reduction, and postoperative infection. Animal studies have shown a gender dimorphic response of the liver for various stresses such as ischemia/reperfusion, hemorrhage/resuscitation, hepatectomy, portal branch ligation, and endotoxemia. Most of these studies demonstrated the female liver to be more tolerant under stressful conditions than the male liver. Estrogen, which is a representative female sex hormone, may be one of the responsible factors for this gender dimorphism. The mechanism of estrogen's salutary effect includes circulatory improvement, a reduced inflammatory response, a reduced oxygen radical production, and an improved hepatic regeneration. However, the clinical evidence that supports the results of these experimental studies is still insufficient. A well-controlled prospective clinical study is necessary to clarify the role of gender or sex hormone in the process of liver surgery. This may not only lead to a deeper understanding of the liver pathophysiology, but also to the possibility of hepatoprotective therapy using sex hormone modulators. This review summarizes the current understanding of gender dimorphism in the tolerance of the liver to various hepatic stresses, which occur during the process of major liver surgery.

Mechanisms of hepatic regeneration following portal vein embolization and partial hepatectomy: a review

BACKGROUND

Portal vein embolization (PVE) improves outcome following major hepatectomy, and basic studies have presented evidence related to the mechanisms responsible for hepatic regeneration. Hemodynamic changes following PVE are similar to, but slightly different from, those of partial hepatectomy (PH) because arterial flow to the embolized lobe is preserved. However, the process of hepatic regeneration is essentially the same after both PVE and PH. A number of mediators are involved in PVE or PH-induced hepatic regeneration. These include inflammatory cytokines, vasoregulators, growth factors, eicosanoids, and various hormones. These mediators activate a complex network of signal transduction that promotes hepatic regeneration. A variety of conditions have been shown to modulate the function of these mediators and inhibit regeneration. These include biliary obstruction, diabetes, chronic ethanol consumption, malnutrition, gender, aging, and infection.

CONCLUSION

Optimizing these factors, where possible, before PVE or PH, is essential to maximize hypertrophy of the liver. A fuller understanding of hepatic physiology and pathophysiology following PVE or PH may lead to greater functional capacity of the remaining liver and extend the indications for hepatectomy in patients who require large liver volume resection.

Liver regeneration: mechanisms, mysteries and more

BACKGROUND

Liver regeneration remains a fascinating topic, still partly clouded to many as to the exact cellular and molecular mechanisms that bring about this phenomenon. It is an area, therefore, of active research today. This review looks at the recent published reports that have led to a greater understanding of this process.

METHODS

A database search was carried out on Medline search using the terms liver regeneration with no linguistic limitations from 1966 to 2006.

RESULTS

There are two randomized controlled trials on the topic and most data and information have come from experimental studies in animals.

CONCLUSION

Liver regeneration is a complex, tightly controlled process involving many inflammatory cells growth factors and hormones. More information about it is awaited in studies on humans.

The effects of pentoxifylline on liver regeneration after portal vein ligation in rats

AIM

To determine the effects of pentoxifylline, a methyl xanthine derivative on hepatic cell production of uninterferred lobe after portal vein branch ligation.

METHODS

Sixty-six rats were randomly allocated into 9 groups with 8 rats in PVL groups and 6 rats in sham operation groups. The portal branches of the median and the lateral liver lobes, corresponding to approximately 70% of the liver volume were ligated in the PVL groups. The control group received 0.9% NaCl solution. The rats in the treatment groups received pentoxifylline at the dose of 50 mg/kg/dy. After 1, 2, 4 days of portal vein ligation in both PVL and PVNL lobes the levels of adenine nucleotides were determined and flowcytometric analysis of cell cycles were performed.

RESULTS

On the first day of portal branch ligation energy charge was significantly lower, in pentoxifylline treated group comparing to pentoxifylline untreated group, both in PVL and PVNL lobes (P<0.05). Proliferative indexes were 0.38 and 0.29 in pentoxifylline treated and pentoxifylline untreated PVNL lobes respectively (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Pentoxifylline treatment resulted in an increase of percentage of calls entering mitosis phase on the first day after PVL, somehow accelerating the regeneration process.

Does estrogen contribute to the hepatic regeneration following portal branch ligation in rats?

The aim of this study was to determine whether estrogen plays any role in the hepatic regeneration of nonligated lobe following portal branch ligation (PBL). Male rats were subjected to PBL on the left and middle lobes. Two and 7 days after PBL, the rats were killed and blood and liver samples were analyzed. Sham animals underwent only laparotomy. The serum estradiol levels were significantly elevated on day 2 following PBL and returned to normal levels on day 7. The expression of estrogen receptors (ER) in the liver evaluated by Western blotting did not show any change in the nonligated lobe compared with shams. Immunohistochemical study for ER showed a predominant ER expression in the hepatocyte nucleus in periportal area (zone 1), although there was no apparent difference in the amount and expression pattern between sham and PBL. However, chronic inhibition of ER by an ER antagonist (ICI 182,780) showed a significantly lower regeneration rate of the nonligated lobe compared with vehicle treatment. Liver regeneration-associated genes also were less activated in the ICI group. Moreover, portal venous flow, determined by fluorescent microsphere injection, was significantly lower in the ICI group compared with vehicle group. These changes correlated with the attenuated expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase mRNA in both superior mesenteric arteries and veins. In conclusion, these results indicate that the estrogen's contribution on hepatic regeneration following PBL is at least partly mediated through maintaining mesenteric blood flow by mesenteric endothelial nitric oxide synthase upregulation rather than directly activating liver regeneration in the liver.

Different hemodynamic patterns of alcoholic and viral endstage cirrhosis: analysis of explanted liver weight, degree of fibrosis and splanchnic Doppler parameters

OBJECTIVE

In cirrhosis, portal hemodynamics is usually considered independently of the disease etiology. The objective of this study was to investigate the role of the etiology of liver disease on the relationship between liver blood flow and liver pathology in endstage cirrhosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Portal blood velocity and volume, congestion index of the portal vein, and hepatic and splenic pulsatility indices were evaluated with echo-Doppler in cirrhotic patients immediately before liver transplantation. When a patent paraumbilical vein was present, its blood flow was measured and effective portal liver perfusion was calculated as portal blood flow minus paraumbilical blood flow. The hemodynamic parameters were correlated with liver weight and the pattern of the liver fibrosis morphometrically assessed in explanted livers. A total of 131 patients with alcoholic or viral cirrhosis were included in the study.

RESULTS

In alcoholic cirrhosis, liver weight was higher than that in viral disease (1246+/-295 g versus 1070+/-254 g, p=0.001), portal liver perfusion per gram of liver tissue was lower (0.49+/-0.36 ml g(-1) min(-1) versus 0.85+/-0.56 ml g(-1) min(-1), p=0.004) and hepatic pulsatility indices were higher (1.45+/-0.31 versus 1.26+/-0.30, p=0.018). The degree of liver fibrosis was similar in alcoholic and viral cirrhosis (11.7+/-5.5% versus 11.0+/-4.4%, p=NS). An inverse relationship between liver weight and Child-Pugh score was disclosed in viral (p<0.001) but not in alcoholic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

A different hemodynamic pattern characterizes the advanced stage of cirrhosis of alcoholic and viral origin. A more severe alteration of intrahepatic portal perfusion, probably coexisting with a more severe hepatocyte dysfunction, and a higher liver weight can be detected in alcoholic cirrhosis.

Mechanism of impaired hepatic regeneration in cholestatic liver

The regenerative capacity of the liver is an important factor following liver surgery. The dramatic change in portal venous flow, due to either portal vein embolization or partial hepatectomy, induces a rapid change in liver volume. In response to these stresses, hepatocytes are primed, through the release of inflammatory cytokines, to increase the expression of immediate early genes and increase the activation of transcriptional factors. The primed hepatocytes then respond to growth factors, including hepatocyte growth factor, epidermal growth factor, and transforming growth factor-alpha. Several pathologic conditions have been shown to inhibit hepatic regeneration. These include diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, aging, infection, chronic ethanol consumption, and biliary obstruction. Impaired hepatic regeneration in the setting of biliary obstruction is an especially serious problem because it can be a major determinant in not considering surgical treatment. The mechanism responsible for impaired hepatic regeneration in patients with biliary obstruction includes decreased portal venous flow, attenuated production of liver proliferation-associated factors, an increased rate of apoptosis, and lack of enterohepatic circulation. Restoring these factors may lead to an improvement in regeneration in a cholestatic liver following portal vein embolization or partial hepatectomy. This review article summarizes the current understanding of the mechanism of hepatic regeneration, with particular emphasis on that in the cholestatic liver.

Evaluation of Hepatic Interleukin-6 Secretion following Portal Vein Ligation Using a Minimal Surgical Stress Model

BACKGROUND

Animal portal vein ligation (PVL) model requires laparotomy under general anesthesia, which induces systemic inflammatory response, and makes the analysis of early signals for hepatic regeneration difficult. We developed a nonstress PVL model, which performs the ligation after surgical stress is subsided, and evaluated the hepatic IL-6 production at early phase of PVL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After laparotomy under general anesthesia, a monofilament suture was placed around the left portal vein and knotted, but not tied, and the two ends were delivered through each flank. Seven days after laparotomy, PVL was created by pulling the two ends of the ligature, tightening the ligature.

RESULTS

Biochemical assays indicated that the surgical stress of laparotomy resolved on day 7. Rate of liver regeneration of the nonligated lobe in this model was similar to that in the conventional PVL model. The serum interleukin-6 concentration rose rapidly (within 3 h) after PVL and remained elevated until 6 h. RT-PCR demonstrated that transcripts of IL-6 gene significantly increased 3 h after ligation in the nonembolized lobes. Furthermore, in situ hybridization for IL-6 mRNA was stained at sinusoidal endothelial cells, especially periportal area.

CONCLUSIONS

Our PVL model minimizing surgical stress was comparable to the stress of clinical portal vein embolization. Using this model, we found an increased expression of IL-6 mRNA in the sinusoidal endothelial cells predominantly at the periportal area.

N/A

N/A

Two hundred forty consecutive portal vein embolizations before extended hepatectomy for biliary cancer: surgical outcome and long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To assess clinical benefit of portal vein embolization (PVE) before extended, complex hepatectomy for biliary cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Many investigators have addressed clinical utility of PVE before simple hepatectomy for metastatic liver cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma, but few have reported PVE before hepatectomy for biliary cancer due to the limited number of surgical cases.

METHODS

This study involved 240 consecutive patients with biliary cancer (150 cholangiocarcinomas and 90 gallbladder cancers) who underwent PVE before an extended hepatectomy (right or left trisectionectomy or right hepatectomy). All PVEs were performed by the "ipsilateral approach" 2 to 3 weeks before surgery. Hepatic volume and function changes after PVE were analyzed, and the outcome also was reviewed.

RESULTS

There were no procedure-related complications requiring blood transfusion or interventions. Of the 240 patients, 47 (19.6%) did not undergo subsequent hepatectomy. The incidence of unresectability was higher in gallbladder cancer than in cholangiocarcinoma (32.2% versus 12.0%, P < 0.005). The remaining 193 patients (132 cholangiocarcinomas and 61 gallbladder cancers) underwent hepatectomy with resection of the caudate lobe and extrahepatic bile duct (n = 187), pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 42), and/or portal vein resection (n = 63). Seventeen (8.8%) patients died of postoperative complications: mortality was higher in gallbladder cancer than in cholangiocarcinoma (18.0% versus 4.5%, P < 0.05); and it was also higher in patients whose indocyanine green clearance (KICG) of the future liver remnant after PVE was <0.05 than those whose index was >or=0.05 (28.6% versus 5.5%, P < 0.001). The 3- and 5-year survival after hepatectomy was 41.7% and 26.8% in cholangiocarcinoma and 25.3% and 17.1% in gallbladder cancer, respectively (P = 0.011). In 136 other patients with cholangiocarcinoma who underwent a less than 50% resection of the liver without PVE, a mortality of 3.7% and a 5-year survival of 27.6% were observed, which was similar to the 132 patients with cholangiocarcinoma who underwent extended hepatectomy after PVE.

CONCLUSIONS

PVE has the potential benefit for patients with advanced biliary cancer who are to undergo extended, complex hepatectomy. Along with the use of PVE, further improvements in surgical techniques and refinements in perioperative management are necessary to make difficult hepatobiliary resections safer.

Percutaneous right portal vein embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles in gastric cancer metastasis: report of a case

Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles are used for the embolization of various vascular tumors. They are also used before hepatic resection to embolize the ipsilateral portal vein, causing hypertrophy of the remaining liver. We report our first experience with portal vein embolization (PVE) with PVA particles to treat gastric cancer metastasis to the liver. PVE with PVA is a safe interventional radiologic procedure, which does not cause problems during surgery and can improve the outcome of hepatic resection.

Portal vein embolization in preparation for major hepatic resection: evolution of a new standard of care

Portal vein (PV) embolization (PVE) is gaining acceptance in the preoperative management of patients selected for major hepatic resection. PVE redirects portal blood flow to the intended liver remnant to induce hypertrophy of the nondiseased portion of the liver and thereby reduce complications and shorten hospital stays after resection. This article reviews the rationale and existing literature on PVE, including the mechanisms of liver regeneration, the pathophysiology of PVE, the imaging techniques used to measure liver volumes and estimate functional hepatic reserve, and the technical aspects of PVE, including approaches and embolic agents used. In addition, the indications and contraindications for performing PVE in patients with and without chronic liver disease and the multidisciplinary approach required for the treatment of these complex cases are emphasized.

Mechanisms of Focal Heat Destruction of Liver Tumors

BACKGROUND

Focal heat destruction has emerged as an effective treatment strategy in selected patients with malignant liver tumors. Radiofrequency ablation, interstitial laser thermotherapy, and microwave treatment are currently the most widely applied thermal ablative techniques. A major limitation of these therapies is incomplete tumor destruction and overall high recurrences. An understanding of the mechanisms of tissue injury induced by focal hyperthermia is essential to ensure more complete tumor destruction. Here, the currently available scientific literature concerning the underlying mechanisms involved in the destruction of liver tumors by focal hyperthermia is reviewed.

METHODS

Medline was searched from 1960 to 2004 for literature regarding the use of focal hyperthermia for the treatment of liver tumors. All relevant literature was searched for further references.

RESULTS

Experimental evidence suggests that focal hyperthermic injury occurs in two distinct phases. The first phase results in direct heat injury that is determined by the total thermal energy applied, tumor biology, and the tumor microenvironment. Tumors are more susceptible to heat injury than normal cells as the result of specific biological features, reduced heat dissipating ability, and lower interstitial pH. The second phase of hyperthermic injury is indirect tissue damage that produces a progression of tissue injury after the cessation of the initial heat stimulus. This progressive injury may involve a balance of several factors, including apoptosis, microvascular damage, ischemia-reperfusion injury, Kupffer cell activation, altered cytokine expression, and alterations in the immune response. Blood flow modulation and administration of thermosensitizing agents are two methods currently used to increase the extent of direct thermal injury. The processes involved in the progression of thermal injury and therapies that may potentially modulate them remain poorly understood.

CONCLUSION

Focal hyperthermia for the treatment of liver tumors involves complex mechanisms. Evidence suggests that focal hyperthermia produces both direct and indirect tissue injury by differing underlying processes. Methods to enhance the effects of treatment to achieve complete tumor destruction should focus on manipulating these processes.

Portal vein embolization before major hepatectomy

To discuss the rationale, techniques and the unsolved issues regarding preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) before major hepatectomy. After a systematic search of Pubmed, we reviewed and retrieved literature related to PVE. Preoperative PVE is an approach that is gaining increasing acceptance in the preoperative treatment of selected patients prior to major hepatic resection. Induction of selective hypertrophy of the nondiseased portion of the liver with PVE in patients with either primary or secondary hepatobiliary, malignancy with small estimated future liver remnants (FLR) may result in fewer complications and shorter hospital stays following resection. Additionally, PVE performed in patients initially considered unsuitable for resection due to lack of sufficient remaining normal parenchyma may add to the pool of candidates for surgical treatment. The results suggest that PVE is recomm-endable in treating the cirrhotic patients before major liver resection.

Critical progressive small-graft injury caused by intrasinusoidal pressure elevation following living donor liver transplantation

In adult-to-adult living liver transplantation, small-for-size graft syndrome sometimes occurs. The relationship between the hemodynamic changes and histologic findings has not been studied in patients with failure of small-for-size grafts. We analyzed the relationship between the postoperative hemodynamic changes and pathologic findings in patients with small-for-size grafts that ended in graft failure. From March 1999 to December 2002, adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation with small-size grafts (graft volume/standard liver volume less than 40%) was performed in eight patients. Three patients died from graft failure caused by overperfusion, which was diagnosed from pathologic findings. We analyzed the relation between hepatic hemodynamic parameters, such as portal venous blood velocity or splenic arterial pulsatility index, and histologic changes in patients with graft failure. Severe portal hyperperfusion (90 cm/sec at the umbilical portion) was observed on postoperative day 1. Among patients with graft failure, critical hemodynamic changes, such as sudden onset of extremely deteriorated portal venous blood flow, occurred during the early postoperative period (postoperative day 5, 3, 6, respectively). Histologic examination revealed vacuolar changes in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes, and submassive necrosis indicated intrasinusoidal pressure elevation. These changes were not observed in the biopsy obtained soon after reperfusion. In conclusion, critically decreased vascular beds may cause intrasinusoidal pressure elevation and sinusoidal circulatory disturbances.

N/A

N/A

Strategies to increase the resectability of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Liver resection can provide long-term survival and cure for patients with colorectal liver metastases but is feasible in only 15-25% of patients. In the last few years several major developments have contributed to increase this resectability rate. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy can provide response rates as high as 50%, allowing surgery in about 10-15% of patients initially deemed unresectable. Patients requiring extensive liver resections with an anticipated small residual liver volume can undergo portal vein embolization to reduce the risk of postoperative liver failure by inducing hypertrophy of the remnant liver. Extensive bilobar disease can be treated by two-stage hepatectomy, with an interval to allow liver regeneration. Ablation techniques can be combined with hepatic resection to reduce local recurrence from incomplete surgical resection margins or to destroy contralateral tumor deposits. Finally, for patients with tumors involving the inferior vena cava or the hepatic veins, in which conventional resection is not feasible, in situ hypothermia or bench resection with reimplantation are suitable for very selected patients. Downstaging strategies may increase the resectability rate of colorectal liver metastases by over 20%.