Ropivacaine in infants and children

Infraorbital nerve block for pain management in pediatric cleft lip surgery in resource-limited areas of Indonesia: A case series

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Cleft lip and palate (CLP) are congenital anomalies of the craniofacial region, commonly found in low- and middle-income countries, including Indonesia. Surgical correction of clefts typically begins at around three months of age to support infant growth. An infraorbital nerve block is an option for regional anesthesia in CLP surgery. This case series aims to determine the effectiveness of infraorbital nerve block in pain management for pediatric CLP surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case series includes five patients who fulfilled the Millard criteria for CLP surgery. All patients received general anesthesia followed by an infraorbital nerve block with 0.2 % ropivacaine in the infraorbital foramen area using the intraoral approach. Data were collected preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively.

DISCUSSION

The combination of general anesthesia and infraorbital nerve block resulted in stable hemodynamics, low delirium scores, low pain intensity, and adequate oral intake postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Infraorbital nerve block with ropivacaine provides intraoperative hemodynamic stability, decreased delirium, and effective postoperative pain management in pediatric patients undergoing CLP surgery.

Chloroprocaine for epidural anesthesia in infants and children

Continuous epidural infusions are an effective and safe method of providing anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in infants and children with multiple advantages over systemic medications, including earlier tracheal extubation, decreased perioperative stress response, earlier return of bowel function, and decreased exposure to volatile anesthetic agents with uncertain long-term neurocognitive effects. Despite these benefits, local anesthetic toxicity remains a concern in neonates and infants because of their decreased metabolic capacity for amide local anesthetics. Chloroprocaine, an ester local anesthetic agent, which is rapidly metabolized in plasma at all ages, is an attractive alternative for this special population, particularly in the presence of superimposed liver impairment or when higher infusion rates are needed for surgical incisions stretching many dermatomes. The current manuscript reviews the literature pertaining to the use of 2-chloroprocaine for regional anesthesia in infants and children. Dosing regimens are presented and the applications of 2-chloroprocaine in this population are discussed.

Femoral nerve blockade using various concentrations of local anesthetic for knee arthroscopy in the pediatric population

BACKGROUND

Femoral nerve blockade (FNB) provides effective postoperative analgesia in children undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery as evidenced by their opioid-sparing effects and decreased postoperative pain scores. Increasing the local anesthetic concentration in peripheral nerve blockade for adults undergoing orthopedic surgery has been shown to be beneficial, increasing block success rate, and providing a longer duration of analgesia. The effect of increasing the concentration of local anesthetic in extremity blocks in children remains largely unexplored.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness of FNB using three concentrations of local anesthetic (ropivacaine 0.2%, bupivacaine 0.25%, and ropivacaine 0.5%) in children and adolescents undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery. The primary outcome evaluated was postoperative opioid consumption before discharge. Secondary outcomes included post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and hospital discharge times, first pain score in PACU, and the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-nine children and adolescents who received a FNB for arthroscopic knee surgery from January 2010 to December 2013 were included for analysis. Local anesthetic used in FNB was ropivacaine 0.2% in 116 (43%) cases, ropivacaine 0.5% in 75 (28%) cases, and bupivacaine 0.25% in 78 (29%) cases. Median postoperative opioid consumption (mg/kg intravenous morphine equivalents) in the ropivacaine 0.5% group was 0 mg/kg (interquartile ranges [IQR]: 0 mg, 0.03 mg/kg) compared to 0.02 mg/kg (IQR: 0, 0.08 mg/kg) in the ropivacaine 0.2% group and 0.01 mg/kg (IQR: 0, 0.08 mg/kg) in the bupivacaine 0.25% group (p=0.009). Median PACU time was shortest in the ropivacaine 0.5% group (47 min; IQR: 36, 68 min) compared to the ropivacaine 0.2% (58 min; IQR: 41, 77) and bupivacaine 0.25% (54 min; IQR: 35, 75 min) groups (p=0.040). Among groups, there were no significant differences in first postoperative pain scores or incidence of nausea and vomiting. No patient in any group experienced a serious adverse event.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that ropivacaine 0.5% for FNB offers superior postoperative analgesia in the form of decreased postoperative opioid consumption and earlier PACU/hospital discharge, when compared to ropivacaine 0.2% and bupivacaine 0.25% in the pediatric population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

A Ropivacaine-Lidocaine Combination for Caudal Blockade in Haemorrhoidectomy

A single dose of caudal lidocaine does not provide a sufficiently long anaesthetic duration and is not generally used for complicated anorectal surgery. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a ropivacaine–lidocaine combination for caudal anaesthesia in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy. A total of 287 haemorrhoid patients with successful initial caudal anaesthesia were randomized to receive either a mixture of 0.375% ropivacaine and 1.0% lidocaine (ropi–lido group; n = 146) or 1.0% lidocaine alone (placebo-lido group; n = 141). Significantly fewer patients in the ropi–lido group required intra-operative supplemental anaesthesia than in the placebo-lido group. Patients treated with the ropivacaine–lidocaine combination had significantly lower scores for pain at each post-operative time point, and a longer mean time to the first requirement for post-operative analgesic than patients in the placebo-lido group. These results suggest that caudal anaesthesia with a combination of ropivacaine and lidocaine is a safe and effective method of inducing anaesthesia during haemorrhoidectomy.

The addition of fentanyl to 1.5 mg/ml ropivacaine has no advantage for paediatric epidural analgesia

BACKGROUND

Epidural opioids are frequently combined with local anaesthetics for an additive antinociceptive effect. We investigated the efficacy of epidural fentanyl to 1.25 or 1.5 mg/ml ropivacaine for post-operative epidural analgesia in children.

METHODS

One hundred and eight children undergoing hypospadias repair were randomized to receive 1.25 mg/ml ropivacaine (R1.25 group), 1.25 mg/ml ropivacaine with 0.2 mcg/kg/h of fentanyl (R1.25F group), 1.5 mg/ml ropivacaine (R1.5 group) or 1.5 mg/ml ropivacaine with 0.2 mcg/kg/h of fentanyl (R1.5F group) for post-operative epidural analgesia. The epidural catheter was threaded caudally through the L4-5 interspace. The face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) score was assessed at every hour and at FLACC score >4, an epidural bolus of 0.5 ml/kg of ropivacaine 1.5 mg/ml was given as the rescue analgesia. The incidence of side effects such as hypoxia, sedation, pruritus, nausea and/or vomiting was recorded.

RESULTS

The need for rescue analgesia was higher in the R1.25 group compared with that in the other three groups (all P<0.05). The incidence of side effects was higher in the R1.5F group compared with that in the R1.25 and R1.5 groups (both P=0.010).

CONCLUSION

The addition of 0.2 mcg/kg/h fentanyl to 1.5 mg/ml ropivacaine increased the incidence of side effects without improvement of analgesia in infants and children undergoing hypospadias repair. The use of plain 1.25 mg/ml ropivacaine increased the need for rescue analgesia and this could be compensated by addition of fentanyl.

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia in children: feasibility and side effects in a cohort study of 339 catheters

INTRODUCTION

Perioperative continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNB) are increasingly being used in children. Only one previous study has reported adverse events of CPNB in a high number of pediatric cases. We evaluated the indications, block efficacy, and adverse events related to CPNB in children.

METHODS

All CPNBs that were performed in children for postoperative analgesia over a 5-year period at the Montpellier University Hospital in France were included in this study. The first bolus dose and the continuous doses of local anesthetic were not standardized. In the postoperative period, demographic data, quality of analgesia, amount of rescue analgesic medication, child/parent satisfaction, and adverse events were recorded in our Departmental Regional Anesthesia registry.

RESULTS

A total of 339 catheters were evaluated in 292 children ASA physical status I to III. The median age was 8 yr (0.6-17 yr) and the median weight was 28 kg (7-116 kg). The main surgical indications were hip, femoral, or tibial osteotomies (44.5%) and club foot repair (27.4%). The local anesthetics used were either bupivacaine or ropivacaine. The mean volume of the local anesthetic bolus dose was 0.49 +/- 0.16 mL . kg(-1), and the mean regimen of local anesthetic continuous infusion was 0.11 +/- 0.04 mL . kg(-1) . hr(-1). The median duration of CPNB was 61.6 hr (range 0-264 hr). Pain relief, which was evaluated with the children at rest, was considered optimal in the majority of patients throughout the study period. The Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) was used in children age 0-6 yr and the Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) was used in children 7 yr and older. There were no major adverse events. There were 211 minor adverse events recorded in 153 CPNBs (45.1%). The most frequently reported complication (20.1%) involved mechanical problems with the catheter, followed by nausea and vomiting (14.7%).

CONCLUSION

CPNBs are indicated after orthopedic surgery in children. Our results demonstrate that CPNBs are feasible in the pediatric setting, and in skilled hands, they promote prolonged analgesia in the majority of patients without major adverse events. The most common minor adverse events are catheter-related mechanical problems and postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Pain therapy in children and adolescents

INTRODUCTION

In children, acute pain occurs predominantly during infectious illnesses or after surgery. Chronic pain, especially headache and abdominal pain, is becoming increasingly common among children and adolescents.

METHODS

Selective literature review, also including evidence-based guidelines and recommendations.

RESULTS

Simple self-reporting and behavioral pain scales are easy to use to assess the intensity of acute pain. To evaluate chronic pain, on the other hand, more complicated, multi-dimensional instruments are necessary (e.g., semi-structured interviews). The most commonly used analgesics are ibuprofen and paracetamol (acetaminophen). When paracetamol is used, its narrow therapeutic window should be kept in mind. Perioperative pain should be treated with balanced analgesia involving a combination of non-pharmacological treatment strategies, non-opioid drugs, opioids, and regional anesthesia. Chronic pain in children can only be treated successfully over the long term with multidisciplinary team intervention based on this biopsychosocial model.

DISCUSSION

Pain not only causes children momentary suffering but also threatens to impair their normal development. Therefore, every effort should be made to prevent pain and to treat it effectively once it arises.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of anesthetics in children: therapeutic implications

Modeling the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anesthetics in children is performed as a response to the clinical need for safe and efficacious administration of drugs with a low therapeutic index. Rates and concentrations of these drugs, which are the primary parameters used by anesthesiologists, depend on physiologic parameters that are markedly affected by development. Volatile anesthetics have been used for >50 years in pediatric patients. The pharmacokinetics of inhalation agents are context sensitive, but little difference between age groups has been described. These agents are not only eliminated unchanged by the lung but they are also metabolized by the liver. Halothane has Michaelis-Menten kinetics, with up to 40% of the administered dose metabolized by the liver. For volatile anesthetics, the effect measured is the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) that leads to movement of the limb in response to skin incision in 50% of the patients studied. The MAC is higher in infants than in children and adults. Infants aged 6 months have a MAC 1.5-1.8 times the MAC observed in adults aged 40 years. Children have a greater clearance and volume of distribution of propofol than adults. In order to achieve similar plasma concentrations, children require three times the initial dose used in adults. In adults, an increased sensitivity to propofol has been demonstrated with aging, but nothing is known about the effects in children. However, it is clear that equipotent doses of propofol induce marked deleterious hemodynamic effects in infants compared with children. Regional anesthesia is used in pediatrics, both in combination with general anesthesia during surgery or alone for postoperative analgesia. A marked decrease in protein binding has been described in infants. In the postoperative period, a rapid increase in binding because of inflammation decreases the free fraction, but the free drug concentration remains constant because of the resulting decrease in total clearance. A low clearance because of liver function immaturity has been observed during the first year(s) of life for bupivacaine and ropivacaine. Pharmacodynamic interactions between general anesthesia and regional anesthesia need to be modeled. This is one of the future tasks for pharmacokineticists. Methods such as the Dixon up-and-down allocation and the isobolographic technique are promising in this field.

Anesthésiques locaux : qu'apportent les formes lévogyres ?

The use of levobupivacaine and of ropivacaine may increase the safety of regional anaesthesia. These pure enantiomers have similar pharmacokinetic properties as those of the racemic mixtures. However, they are less cardiotoxic than the racemic mixtures, especially at the high heart rate usually encountered in infants. We may then recommend the use of these agents in the paediatric patients.

Randomized, double-blind, phase III, controlled trial comparing levobupivacaine 0.25%, ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25% by the caudal route in children

BACKGROUND

The rationale for replacing racemic bupivacaine with the s-enantiomers levobupivacaine and ropivacaine is to provide a wider margin of safety with the same analgesic efficacy and less postoperative motor block. In a randomized, double-blind, phase III, controlled trial we compared the caudal administration of levobupivacaine 0.25% and ropivacaine 0.25% with bupivacaine 0.25% in children.

METHODS

Ninety-nine ASA I-II children less than 10 yr old scheduled for elective sub-umbilical surgery were randomized to receive caudal block with bupivacaine 0.25%, ropivacaine 0.25% or levobupivacaine 0.25%. The primary outcome of the study was the clinical efficacy of the caudal block during the operation. Secondary outcome measures were analgesic onset time, pain relief after the operation and residual motor blockade.

RESULTS

The proportion of children with effective analgesia during the operation was similar among groups. There were no significant differences in the analgesic onset time of the caudal block. Bupivacaine produced a significant incidence of residual motor block compared with levobupivacaine or ropivacaine at wake-up (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in the number of patients receiving rescue analgesia after surgery. However, analgesic block lasted significantly longer in patients receiving bupivacaine (P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

During sub-umbilical surgery, caudal levobupivacaine, ropivacaine and bupivacaine provided comparable analgesic efficacy. Bupivacaine produced a higher incidence of residual motor blockade and a longer analgesic block than ropivacaine and levobupivacaine.