Antipsychotic drug treatment: recent advances:

Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

These guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology address the scope and targets of pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia. A consensus meeting, involving experts in schizophrenia and its treatment, reviewed key areas and considered the strength of evidence and clinical implications. The guidelines were drawn up after extensive feedback from the participants and interested parties, and cover the pharmacological management and treatment of schizophrenia across the various stages of the illness, including first-episode, relapse prevention, and illness that has proved refractory to standard treatment. The practice recommendations presented are based on the available evidence to date, and seek to clarify which interventions are of proven benefit. It is hoped that the recommendations will help to inform clinical decision making for practitioners, and perhaps also serve as a source of information for patients and carers. They are accompanied by a more detailed qualitative review of the available evidence. The strength of supporting evidence for each recommendation is rated.

Patient adherence and efficacy of quetiapine treatment in schizophrenia: results of a multicentre, naturalistic 6-month follow-up study

The aim of the study was to evaluate the adherence and efficacy of quetiapine treatment in a 6-month, multicentre, noninterventional naturalistic design. Overall, 710 schizophrenia patients using quetiapine or who had switched to quetiapine were included. The continuation rate for quetiapine treatment during 6-month follow-up period was 69%. Adherence improved with each subsequent visit for continued patients, 92.9% at the second visit to 96.1% at the last. Treatment adherence was correlated to improvement of symptoms, though not significantly. Patients having lower clinical global impression severity scores at the beginning were twice as likely to improve compared with patients with higher clinical global impression scores. Schizophrenia patients with antisocial behaviour problems had two and a half times higher drop-out rates. In conclusion, this naturalistic study showed that adherence to quetiapine treatment was high, and treatment was effective in schizophrenia patients during long-term treatment. Remission of symptoms in schizophrenia is much related to severity of symptoms at baseline, treatment adherence and characteristics of patients such as antisocial behavioural patterns.

Multi-target strategies for the improved treatment of depressive states: Conceptual foundations and neuronal substrates, drug discovery and therapeutic application

Major depression is a debilitating and recurrent disorder with a substantial lifetime risk and a high social cost. Depressed patients generally display co-morbid symptoms, and depression frequently accompanies other serious disorders. Currently available drugs display limited efficacy and a pronounced delay to onset of action, and all provoke distressing side effects. Cloning of the human genome has fuelled expectations that symptomatic treatment may soon become more rapid and effective, and that depressive states may ultimately be "prevented" or "cured". In pursuing these objectives, in particular for genome-derived, non-monoaminergic targets, "specificity" of drug actions is often emphasized. That is, priority is afforded to agents that interact exclusively with a single site hypothesized as critically involved in the pathogenesis and/or control of depression. Certain highly selective drugs may prove effective, and they remain indispensable in the experimental (and clinical) evaluation of the significance of novel mechanisms. However, by analogy to other multifactorial disorders, "multi-target" agents may be better adapted to the improved treatment of depressive states. Support for this contention is garnered from a broad palette of observations, ranging from mechanisms of action of adjunctive drug combinations and electroconvulsive therapy to "network theory" analysis of the etiology and management of depressive states. The review also outlines opportunities to be exploited, and challenges to be addressed, in the discovery and characterization of drugs recognizing multiple targets. Finally, a diversity of multi-target strategies is proposed for the more efficacious and rapid control of core and co-morbid symptoms of depression, together with improved tolerance relative to currently available agents.

Resting energy expenditure is lower than predicted in people taking atypical antipsychotic medication

Resting energy expenditure (REE) is lower than predicted in persons taking atypical antipsychotic medication, and weight management is a significant clinical challenge for some of them. However, to date there have been no published guidelines to assist clinicians in choosing appropriate prediction equations to estimate energy expenditure in persons taking atypical antipsychotic medications. The objectives of this study were to measure REE in a group of men taking the atypical antipsychotic clozapine and to determine whether REE can be accurately predicted for this population using previously published regression equations. REE was measured using indirect calorimetry via a ventilated hood on eight men who had completed at least 6 months of treatment with clozapine. Comparisons between measured REE and predicted REE using five different equations were undertaken. The commonly-used Harris-Benedict and Schofield equations systematically overestimated REE. Predictions of REE from other equations were too variable for clinical use. When estimating energy requirements as part of a weight-management program in men who have been taking clozapine for 6 months, predictions of REE from the equations of Harris-Benedict and Schofield should be reduced by 280 kcal/day.

Subjective response to antipsychotics of schizophrenia patients treated in routine clinical practice: a naturalistic comparative study

In routine practice, subjective response to antipsychotics is becoming a critical outcome measure among schizophrenia patients. This study sought to compare subjective response to atypical (risperidone and olanzapine) and typical antipsychotic drugs. Using a naturalistic cross-sectional design, we examined subjective response to antipsychotics (satisfaction with medication and subjective tolerability), psychopathology, side effects, emotional distress, and awareness in schizophrenia patients stabilized on atypical (n = 78) and typical (n = 55) drugs. Analysis of variance and multiple regression analysis were applied. We found that atypical drugs were superior to typical antipsychotics in both measures of subjective response, which were positively correlated (r = 0.52, P < 0.001). Poor subjective response was associated with severity of emotional distress, negative, and activation symptoms in the atypical group and with extrapyramidal side effects and positive symptoms in the typical group. Awareness of treatment is a positive factor that accounted for 20% and 34% of variation in the subjective responses to atypical and typical antipsychotic drugs, respectively. Demographic variables, age of onset, illness duration, and adjunctive drugs did not relate significantly to subjective response to antipsychotic drugs. Thus, atypical drugs are characterized by better subjective response compared with typical antipsychotics; their determinants differed considerably. Satisfaction with medication together with subjective tolerability needs to be considered in clinical trials.

Efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in patients with schizophrenia switched from other antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE The Seroquel Patient Evaluation on Changing Treatment Relative to Usual Medication (SPECTRUM) study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine (Seroquel™) in patients with schizophrenia switched from treatments providing suboptimal outcomes. METHODS This was an international, open-label, non-comparative study, designed with titration to 400 mg/day quetiapine over 7 days, then flexible dosing (300-750 mg/day) for 11 weeks. Efficacy was assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS); Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity of Illness and Global Improvement scores; and the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS). Clinical benefit and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS The mean modal dose of quetiapine was 505 mg/day; 509 patients switched to quetiapine from olanzapine (13%), risperidone (11%), conventional antipsychotics (37%) and combinations of antipsychotics (28%), amongst others. Significant decreases in CGI Severity of Illness and PANSS scores and a significant improvement in CDSS score resulted from the switch (all P&lt;0.001 versus baseline). There were significant reductions in extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) on the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) and Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) (both P&lt;0.001 versus baseline) and a low incidence of EPS-related adverse events (4.7%). CONCLUSION Results indicate that switching to quetiapine was clinically beneficial for patients with poor efficacy or intolerable side effects on their previous antipsychotic medication.

A five year follow-up study of the use of clozapine in community practice

OBJECTIVE

To present information about the value of clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Data is reported on the use of clozapine in an entire cohort of (42) patients in a community, the Australian Capital Territory. It extends a 3-year study of clinical and financial outcomes to 5 years.

METHOD

Experiences during the 2 years before clozapine was prescribed and those of the 5 years following prescription were compared by a records review, including hospital and hostel bed use and estimated treatment costs. Changes in dose levels, living circumstances and employment status were assessed, and treating psychiatrists reported on side-effects and their impression of clinical change since clozapine was prescribed.

RESULTS

Ten subjects were excluded. The remaining cohort (32 subjects) demonstrated continuing clinical improvement and cost savings during follow-up. Those (22) remaining on clozapine after the five year period showed continuing clinical improvement, reduced hospital admissions and hospital bed usage and significantly large cost savings, and were moderately to markedly improved after 3 years. Only one patient (of 22) showed a slight deterioration in the next two years while 14 showed further improvement. After 5 years, the clinical status of four of the 10 subjects who discontinued clozapine was unchanged or deteriorated compared with their preclozapine status. There were no suicides.

CONCLUSION

The findings of continuing clinical improvement and decreased costs after long-term (5 years) use of clozapine supports the selective use of clozapine in community practice.

Ethics and early intervention in psychosis: keeping up the pace and staying in step

The intense clinical and research interest in early psychosis in recent years has highlighted a range of ethical issues which need to be considered carefully. Our perspective is based on 16 years of clinical and research experience with young people at this phase of illness as well as the research contributions of many others. We discuss the ethical dilemmas in relation to the three key foci, which make up the early psychosis paradigm. These are the pre-psychotic or prodromal phase, the period of untreated psychosis and the first psychotic episode and the critical period of recovery, which follows this. Most attention is devoted to the pre-psychotic period, however ethical considerations related to research in the other two clinical foci are briefly covered as well. Our contention is that the ethical issues are essentially identical to those arising in early intervention research in mainstream medicine. This has been concealed by inconsistency and emotion, which has great potential to confuse, politicize and derail rational debate. The legacy of the isolation of psychiatry from medicine and consequent prejudice and stigma in the professional as well as the public mind seems to be fueling a tendency in some societies to view psychiatric research as qualitatively different from other medical research. Sound clinical research data should be allowed to illuminate the options for potential consumers across all phases of illness. The alternative is research paralysis, which would force clinical practice to expand blindly without an evidence base.