Does electron beam computer tomography provide added value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease?

MRI detects increased coronary wall thickness in asymptomatic individuals: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the use of coronary wall MRI as a measure of atherosclerotic disease burden in an asymptomatic population free of clinical cardiovascular disease. Coronary wall magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive method for evaluation of arterial wall remodeling associated with atherosclerosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Asymptomatic participants of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) study were studied using black blood MRI. MRI-assessed coronary wall thickness was compared with computed tomography calcium score, carotid intimal-medial thickness, and risk factors for coronary artery disease.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight arterial segments were evaluated in 38 MESA participants (mean age, 61.3+/-8.7 years). The maximum coronary wall thickness was greater for participants with two or more cardiovascular risk factors than for those with one or no risk factors (2.59+/-0.33 mm vs. 2.36+/-0.30 mm, respectively, P=0.05.) For participants with zero calcium score, the mean and maximum coronary wall thickness for subjects with two or more risk factors for coronary artery disease were greater than the wall thickness for subjects with one or no risk factors (mean thickness: 1.95+/-0.17 mm vs. 1.7+/-0.19 mm; maximum thickness: 2.67+/-0.24 mm vs. 2.32+/-0.27 mm, respectively, P<0.05). Subjects with increased carotid intimal-medial thickness also had increased coronary artery wall thickness (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Coronary artery wall MRI detects increased coronary wall thickness in asymptomatic individuals with subclinical markers of atherosclerotic disease and in individuals with zero calcium score.

Subclinical disease detection: advanced imaging applications

Coronary events are the leading cause of death in the United States, and sudden coronary death is often the first presenting symptom. Because there is such a large population at risk for coronary events and because many of these patients go undetected before presenting with a significant cardiovascular event or sudden death, there is great interest in better detection and characterization of subclinical disease before it causes morbidity and mortality. This chapter will focus on promising imaging-based methods for the evaluation of subclinical cardiovascular disease. Several imaging methods that are most likely to be useful for future screening and intervention studies for characterizing risk among asymptomatic persons will be presented.

Management of Coronary Heart Disease: Stable Angina, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction

Stable angina should first be treated medically, particularly with aspirin and beta-blockers. Diagnostic stress tests are used in patients who have intermediate probability of CHD to further assess the likelihood of disease,with catheterization reserved for patients who have symptoms despite optimal medical therapy or are at risk for multivessel CHD. The work-up for low-risk unstable angina can involve medical management followed by stress testing. Moderate-to-high risk unstable angina and NSTEMI should be treated with an integrated approach, using medical therapy, cardiac catheterization, and revascularization. Patients who have STEMI require urgent reperfusion either with thrombolytic agents or primary angioplasty. Follow-ing a diagnosis of CHD, patients should undergo intense coronary risk-fac-tor modification to reduce the risk of future events.

Aortic calcification

OBJECTIVES

Vascular calcification is a complicating factor observed in advanced atherosclerosis. This review summarises the present knowledge regarding abdominal aortic calcification.

DESIGN

Literature review.

METHODS

A literature review was carried using MEDLINE and PUBMED with the search terms 'abdominal', 'aortic' and 'calcification'. Articles were assessed for data regarding mechanisms, measurement, risk factors and outcomes of aortic calcification.

RESULTS

Thirty relevant studies were identified. These demonstrated a positive correlation between abdominal aortic calcification and the following factors: older age, hypertension, and smoking. Further studies are required to critically assess other risk factors such as gender, diabetes mellitus and renal failure. Calcification of the abdominal aorta is associated with an increased risk of mortality, coronary heart disease and stroke.

CONCLUSION

Aortic calcification predicts an increased incidence of cardiovascular events, however, the reasons for this association requires further investigation. Accurate measurement of aortic calcification is likely to be increasingly used to determine the risk of cardiovascular events.