Careful selection of sample dilution and factor-V-deficient plasma makes the modified activated protein C resistance test highly specific for the factor V Leiden mutation

The Predictability of Factor V Leiden (FV:Q506) Gene Mutation via Clotting-Based Diagnosis of Activated Protein C Resistance

After the discovery of activated protein C resistance (APCR) due to factor V Leiden mutation and the causal relationship of the phenomenon with clinical thromboembolism, a wide variety of functional clotting-based assays were developed for testing of APCR in relation to the specific DNA-based analysis of FV:Q506 Leiden. The aim of this study is to assess a clotting-based APCR assay using procoagulant crotalidae snake venom with respect to the sensitivity, specificity, and predictability for the presence of the factor V Leiden mutation. APCR testing and factor V DNA analyses have been performed concurrently on 319 patient specimens. APCR values of the patients with homozygous factor V Leiden mutation (70.4±13.5 s) were significantly lower (p<0.001) in comparison to the subjects with the heterozygous mutation (87.6±13.4 s). The assay is highly sensitive (98.7%) and specific (91.9%) for the screening of factor V Leiden mutation. The sensitivity and specificity of the APCR testing reached to 100% below the cut-off value of 120 s among the patients with homozygous factor V Leiden mutation. Therefore, this method could help the desired effective optimal screening strategy for the laboratory search of hereditary thrombophilia focusing on the diagnosis of APCR due to FV:Q506.

Clinical profile, common thrombophilia markers and risk factors in 85 young Indian patients with arterial thrombosis

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

Arterial thrombosis may occur consequent to hereditary thrombophilia and increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and fibrinogen. Our aim was to study the prevalence of common thrombophilia markers in 85 consecutive cases of arterial thrombosis.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective study was conducted from 85 consecutive young patients treated as outpatients or admitted due to stroke or myocardial infarction at a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

Eighty-five Indian patients (age < 45 years) presenting ischemic stroke (n = 48) or myocardial infarction (n = 37) and 50 controls were studied for seven thrombophilia markers including antithrombin (AT), factor V, protein C, protein S, activated protein C resistance (APC-R), fibrinogen and Lp(a). Functional assays for protein C, protein S, factor V and APC-R were performed using clotting-based methods. Semi-quantitative estimation of fibrinogen was done using Clauss's method and Lp(a) using immunoturbidimetry. Statistical analysis was done using the Epi Info 6 software.

RESULTS

Thirty-three samples (38.8%) tested positive for one or more thrombophilia markers. The three commonest abnormalities were elevated Lp(a) (20%), fibrinogen (17.6%) and low APC-R (14.2%). Low levels of protein C, protein S and AT were present in 4.7, 9.4 and 7% of the patients, respectively. Overall, the risk factor profile was: smoking (33%), positive family history (15.3%), hyperlipidemia (7%), hypertension, diabetes mellitus and obesity (2.3% each).

CONCLUSIONS

An association was found between low levels of protein C, protein S and AT and arterial thrombosis, but only elevated fibrinogen levels, smoking, positive family history and hyperlipidemia showed statistical significance.

Factor V Leiden and FII 20210 testing in thromboembolic disorders

Factor V Leiden and prothrombin (F2) c.20210G>A mutation detection are very important in order to define the increased relative risk for venous thromboembolism in selected patients. Use of DNA-based methods to detect both mutations has become widely available in clinical diagnostic laboratories, including fluorescence-based quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). The latter is a rapid, simple, robust and reliable method to identify genotypes of interest. There are several chemistries used for qPCR; this article describes their principles and applicability for Factor V Leiden and prothrombin (F2) c.20210G>A mutation detection.

An overview of methods for detection of factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A mutations

Venous thromboembolism, represented by deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a common disease with high mortality and morbidity. Within the last 25 years, risk factors for venous thromboembolism have been linked to mutations in the genes of the coagulation/anticoagulation system. Factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A mutations are the most prevalent inherited risk factors predisposing to venous thromboembolism in the Western world. Tests to detect these mutations are carried out when investigating a personal or family history of venous thromboembolism. At the present, there are several different methods available for the detection of these mutations in the laboratory. The choice of the method will depend on many variables. This article is aimed at reviewing the available methods for the detection of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations, their principle, applicability, advantages and disadvantages of use.

Quality Assurance Issues and Interpretation of Assays

The consequences of an erroneous thrombophilia diagnosis may be serious if it is used to determine clinical management. Therefore careful selection, assessment, and control of laboratory tests for thrombophilia are essential. As for other coagulation tests, the pre-analytical phase must be carefully controlled with attention to the specific problems associated with each type of assay. The investigator must then recognize that for most laboratory tests of thrombophilia, there are a number of assay types available, often based on different principles of analysis. This creates the potential for different users to obtain varying results depending on the technique employed. Such problems can occur in assays of antithrombin activity, depending on whether the assay employs factor Xa, human thrombin, or bovine thrombin. In clot-based assays of protein C and protein S, there can be specificity problems related to interference by factor V Leiden (FVL), antiphospholipid antibodies, and other substances. Even genetic tests can give erroneous results and should not automatically be seen as absolute without supporting evidence and careful quality-control measures. Whatever technique is selected, it is mandatory to incorporate sufficient concurrent quality-control samples to validate the results of thrombophilia tests. These should include assessment of the parameter at normal and abnormal levels to give confidence in results across the measurement range that would normally be encountered in routine practice. This should be used in conjunction with regular participation in external quality assessment (EQA) (which has been linked to improved laboratory performance in thrombophilia testing). Larger EQA programs can provide information concerning the relative performance of analytical procedures, including the method principle, reagents, and instruments. Herein, we describe many of the methodologic effects in detail. We use specific examples to illustrate the general principle that, in performing laboratory testing for thrombophilia, one must always consider the performance characteristics and limitations of the assay in use.

Primary upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis: high prevalence of thrombophilic defects

Primary deep venous thrombosis of the upper extremity (UEDVT) is an unusual disorder. Limited data are available on the contribution of hypercoagulable status in the pathogenesis of this disease. This study aims to report the prevalence of inherited and acquired thrombophilic risk factors (TF) in patients with primary (effort-related and spontaneous) UEDVT. From 1993 to 2002, 31 patients (17 females, median age 38.8 years, range 16-60 years; and 14 males, median age 31.4 years, range 20-56 years) with primary UEDVT (n = 15 effort-related and n = 16 spontaneous) were referred for screening of hypercoagulable status. Nineteen (61.3%) patients had at least one coagulation abnormality. The most common acquired TF were antiphospholipid antibodies (31% lupus anticoagulant and 12.9% anticardiolipin antibodies). Factor V Leiden (12.9%) and prothrombin G20210A mutation (20%) were the most prevalent genetic risk factors. Five patients (16.1%) had high plasma homocysteine levels, and one patient (4.7%) had protein S deficiency. Effort-related UEDVT was associated with male gender (P = 0.04) and younger age (P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of acquired or inherited TF between patients with effort-related or spontaneous UEDVT. A local anatomic abnormality was detected in seven patients (22.5%), and the prevalence of TF was significantly lower within this group (P = 0.006). The incidence of TF in patients without an anatomic abnormality was 75% (RR 5.25). This study found a high prevalence of an underlying thrombophilic status in spontaneous and effort-related UEDVT. Hypercoagulable status may play a significant role in both groups. Screening for local anatomical abnormalities and thrombophilia should be included in the evaluation of primary UEDVT.

High plasma levels of factor VIII and risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between factor VIII (FVIII) levels, measured by chromogenic and clotting assays, and risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence. A total of 564 patients underwent clinical follow-up after oral anticoagulant withdrawal (total follow-up = 924.4 years). Recurrent VTE developed in 39 of 309 (12.6%) patients with a first idiopathic VTE and in 14 of 255 (5.5%) patients whose first event was secondary. In patients with a first idiopathic VTE, the risk of recurrence was more than fivefold higher in patients with FVIII levels exceeding the 90th percentile [chromogenic FVIII: relative risk (RR) 5.43 (95% CI 1.76-16.8); clotting FVIII: RR 6.21 (95% CI 1.57-24.5)] after adjustment for all possible confounding variables. In patients with a first secondary VTE, the risk of recurrence was slightly higher in patients with high FVIII levels [chromogenic FVIII: RR 2.62 (95% CI 0.34-19.9); clotting FVIII: RR 1.74 (95% CI 0.25-12.1)], but, given the low number of recurrences, the 95% CI were very large. In conclusion, this study shows that high FVIII levels are associated with increased risk of VTE recurrence in patients with a first idiopathic VTE. Although the measurement of FVIII levels by a specific chromogenic assay might, in principle, be preferred to avoid the risk of aspecific clotting effects, no significant differences in results obtained by chromogenic or clotting methods were found.

A prospective study of venous thromboembolism in relation to factor V Leiden and related factors

The aim of this study was to examine the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in relation to factor V-related risk factors. Using a nested case-control design combining 2 population-based prospective studies, we measured factor V Leiden, HR2 haplotype, activated protein C (APC) resistance, and plasma factor V antigen in 335 participants who developed VTE during 8 years of follow-up and 688 controls. The overall odds ratio (OR) of VTE was 3.67 (95% CI, 2.20-6.12) in participants carrying factor V Leiden compared with noncarriers. APC resistance measured after predilution with factor V-deficient plasma conferred an OR of 2.58 (95% CI, 1.62-4.10). All 3 participants homozygous for the HR2 haplotype had a VTE, and the OR of VTE for homozygosity was estimated to be 5.5 (95% CI, 2.45-12.5). Carriers of the HR2 haplotype otherwise were not at increased risk of VTE overall (OR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.64-1.72), but double heterozygotes for HR2 and factor V Leiden carried an OR of idiopathic VTE of 16.3 (95% CI, 1.7-159) compared with noncarriers. Factor V antigen also was not associated with VTE overall, but for participants with the combination of high factor V antigen plus factor V Leiden the OR of idiopathic VTE was 11.5 (95% CI, 4.2-31.4). In the general population, APC resistance and factor V Leiden were important VTE risk factors; homozygosity for the HR2 haplotype may be a risk factor but was rare; otherwise, HR2 haplotype and factor V antigen were not risk factors except in carriers of factor V Leiden.

The activated protein C (APC)-resistant phenotype of APC cleavage site mutants of recombinant factor V in a reconstituted plasma model

Recently, new missense mutations in the activated protein C (APC) cleavage sites of human factor V (FV) distinct from the R506Q (FV Leiden) mutation have been reported. These mutations affect the APC cleavage site at arginine (Arg) 306 in the heavy chain of activated FV. Whether these mutations result in APC resistance and are associated with a risk of thrombosis is not clear. The main objective of the present study was to identify the APC-resistant phenotype of FV molecules with different mutations in APC cleavage sites. To study this, recombinant FV mutants were reconstituted in FV-deficient plasma, after which normalized APC-sensitivity ratios (n-APC-SRs) were measured in activated partial thromboplastin time-based and Russell's Viper Venom time-based APC-resistance tests. The mutations introduced in FV were R306G, R306T, R506Q, R679A and combinations of these mutations. Based on the APC-sensitivity ratios, we conclude that the naturally occurring mutations at Arg306 (i.e. FV HongKong and FV Cambridge) result in a mildly reduced sensitivity for APC (n-APC-SR, 0.74-0.87), whereas much lower values (n-APC-SR, 0.41-0.51) are obtained for the mutation at Arg506 (FV Leiden). No effect on the n-APC-SR was observed for the recombinant FV mutant containing the single Ala679 mutation. Because reduced sensitivity for APC, not due to FV Leiden, is a risk factor for venous thrombosis, these data suggest that mutations at Arg306 might be associated with a mild risk of venous thrombosis.

Factor V antigen levels and venous thrombosis: risk profile, interaction with factor V leiden, and relation with factor VIII antigen levels

Clotting factor V has a dual function in coagulation: after activation, procoagulant factor V stimulates the formation of thrombin, whereas anticoagulant factor V acts as a cofactor for activated protein C (APC) in the degradation of factor VIII/VIIIa, thereby reducing thrombin formation. In the present study, we evaluated whether plasma factor V levels, either decreased or increased, are associated with venous thrombosis. High procoagulant factor V levels may enhance prothrombinase activity and increase the thrombosis risk. Low anticoagulant factor V levels could reduce APC-cofactor activity in the factor VIII inactivation (APC-resistant phenotype), which might also promote thrombosis. Low factor V levels in combination with factor V Leiden could lead to a more severe APC-resistant phenotype (pseudohomozygous APC resistance). To address these issues, we have measured factor V antigen (factor V:Ag) levels in 474 patients with thrombosis and 474 control subjects that were part of the Leiden Thrombophilia Study (LETS). Factor V:Ag levels increased by 7.6 U/dL for every successive 10 years of age. Mean factor V:Ag levels were 134 (range 41 to 305) U/dL in patients and 132 (range 47 to 302) U/dL in controls. Neither high nor low factor V:Ag levels were associated with venous thrombosis. We found that factor V:Ag and factor VIII antigen levels in plasma were correlated, but factor V did not modify the thrombotic risk of high factor VIII levels. The normalized APC ratio was not influenced by the factor V:Ag level in subjects with or without factor V Leiden. We conclude that neither low nor high factor V:Ag levels are associated with venous thrombosis and that factor V:Ag levels do not mediate the thrombotic risk associated with high factor VIII levels.