Strain differences in tamoxifen sensitivity of Sprague-Dawley and Fischer 344 rats

Nicotine sensitization (part 1): estradiol or tamoxifen is required during the induction phase and not the expression phase to enable locomotor sensitization to nicotine in female rats

RATIONALE

Nicotine sensitization involves two functionally distinct phases: induction and expression. Estradiol enhances nicotine sensitization in female rats, but it is not known whether this enhancement is specific to one or both phases.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the effects of estradiol selectively during the induction and the expression of nicotine sensitization.

METHODS

Ovariectomy (OVX) rats were administered E2 during the induction (2 injection days) and/or the expression phase (9 days later) of nicotine sensitization. The selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen (agonist of ERα and ERß, agonist of the g-coupled estradiol receptor GPER1) also was used to elucidate receptor candidates for the effects of E2 on nicotine sensitization.

RESULTS

Gonadally intact female rats exhibited expression of nicotine sensitization after a 9-day delay, whereas OVX females did not. Administration of E2 limited to the induction phase of nicotine sensitization rescued expression of nicotine sensitization in OVX females. Tamoxifen during induction did not alter expression of sensitization in gonadally intact female rats, and, like E2, was sufficient to reverse the dampening effects of OVX on expression of sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

The enhancing effects of E2 on nicotine sensitization occur during the induction phase of nicotine sensitization, although require a delay to produce the effects on locomotor activity to nicotine, and may involve non-canonical estrogen pathways (e.g., activation of GPER1).

A Critical Assessment of the OECD Collaborative Study to Validate the Uterotrophic Assay for the Detection of Oestrogenic and Anti-oestrogenic Chemicals

The design and execution of a recently completed validation study on the rat uterotrophic assay for detecting oestrogens and anti-oestrogens, managed by the OECD, are critically assessed with respect to internationally agreed criteria for the validation of new in vitro and in vivo toxicity test methods. It is concluded that, while the design of the study did not take account of several important criteria for validation, the uterotrophic assay appears to reliably detect the strong and weak oestrogenic substances used in the study, which act via binding to the oestrogen receptor in vivo. However, the reliability of the assay has not been substantiated for detecting anti-oestrogens that act as antagonists, due to the involvement of an insufficient number of experiments and test chemicals. Moreover, the data do not permit an assessment of the accuracy of the prediction of oestrogenicity, and the protocols have not been sufficiently optimised with regard to controlling variables. This problem has been exacerbated by a wish to introduce as much flexibility as possible into the protocols during the formal validation phase of the study, rather than during a separate prevalidation stage. In addition, the choice between surgically treated and/or immature animals, and details of housing and husbandry conditions that are necessary for increasing the sensitivity and efficiency of the assay, need to be clarified. The assay also lacks a well-defined prediction model by which the overall relevance of the data to toxicity, and especially to human hazard, can be assessed, and no performance criteria have been established. The results of this analysis of the study indicate that it would be premature to produce an OECD test guideline for the uterotrophic assay at this time, before some of the above issues have been satisfactorily resolved.

Comparative uterotrophic effects of endoxifen and tamoxifen in ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats

Endoxifen (4-hydroxy-N-desmethyl-tamoxifen), one of the major active metabolites of tamoxifen, has substantially greater estrogen antagonist properties and antiproliferative effects in breast tumor cells than tamoxifen, a mixed estrogen agonist/antagonist. An associated risk of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia has been linked to the estrogen agonist properties of tamoxifen. We evaluated endoxifen using a classic uterotrophic effects method. Rats were given endoxifen or tamoxifen orally for 3 days. Estradiol was the positive control. Endoxifen and tamoxifen plasma levels exceeded those previously observed clinically. Uterine weight was 3-fold higher in the estradiol group than in the tamoxifen or endoxifen groups, which did not differ from vehicle controls. Tamoxifen and endoxifen caused a greater increase in luminal epithelial cell height than estradiol. Both tamoxifen and endoxifen produced an increase in the stromal BrdU labeling index (LI) that was ≤ estradiol and inversely related to dose, but did not affect luminal epithelial cell BrdU LI. As expected, estradiol increased luminal epithelial cell proliferation. These results indicate that endoxifen induces uterotrophic effects, but is less potent than estradiol in eliciting these effects. Given prior preclinical observations that endoxifen has superior antitumor activity than tamoxifen, the observations of similar uterine effects suggest that the endoxifen risk/benefit ratio may be superior to tamoxifen.

Estrogen effects on the forced swim test differ in two outbred rat strains

Changes in reproductive hormones, such as estrogen, play a role in mood regulation. The present study examined strain differences (Long-Evans vs. Wistar-Hannover) in the behavioral and biochemical effects of estrogen manipulation. Adult ovariectomized female rats were treated with estradiol, vehicle, or withdrawn from estradiol. The two strains demonstrated differential behavioral responses to short-term estradiol administration in the forced swim test; estradiol induced an antidepressant-like effect in Long-Evans rats but not in Wistar rats. Conversely, withdrawal from estradiol resulted in a depressive-like state in the Wistar rats but not in the Long-Evans rats. Western blot analyses found no differences in estrogen receptors α and β within the hippocampus or the frontal cortex, two brain areas strongly implicated in affective disorders. These data demonstrate the importance of strain as a variable when interpreting behavioral effects of estrogen.

Divergent mechanisms for trophic actions of estrogens in the brain and peripheral tissues

17β-estradiol (E(2)) can enhance reproductive, cognitive, and affective functions; however, the mechanisms by which E(2) has these effects need to be better understood. Pleiotrophic effects of E(2) can occur via traditional and novel actions at various forms of estrogen receptors (ERs). In the central nervous system, trophic effects of E(2) may be related to beneficial effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). However, in peripheral reproductive tissues, E(2)'s capacity to evoke growth can increase risk of cancers. This review focuses on investigations aimed at elucidating divergent mechanisms of steroids to promote trophic effects in the brain, independent of effects on peripheral reproductive tissues. First, actions of estrogens via ERα or ERβ for peripheral growth (carcinogen-induced tumors, uterine growth) and hippocampus-dependent behaviors (affect, cognition) are described. Second, factors that influence these effects of estrogens are described (e.g. experience, timing/critical windows, non-ER mechanisms). Third, effects of estrogens at ERβ related to actions of progestogens, such as 5α-pregnan-3α-ol-20-one (3α,5α-THP) are described. In summary, effects of E(2) may occur via multiple mechanisms, which may underlie favorable effects in the brain with minimal peripheral trophic effects.

Risk for premenstrual dysphoric disorder is associated with genetic variation in ESR1, the estrogen receptor alpha gene

BACKGROUND

Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a heritable mood disorder that is triggered by gonadal steroids during the luteal phase in susceptible women.

METHODS

We performed haplotype analyses of estrogen receptors alpha and beta (ESR1 and ESR2) in 91 women with prospectively confirmed PMDD and 56 control subjects to investigate possible sources of the genetic susceptibility to affective dysregulation induced by normal levels of gonadal steroids. We also examined associations with the valine (Val)158methionine (Met) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the gene for catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), an enzyme involved in estrogen metabolism and prefrontal cortical activation.

RESULTS

Four SNPs in intron 4 of ESR1 showed significantly different genotype and allele distributions between patients and control subjects. Significant case-control differences were seen in sliding-window analyses of two-, three-, and four-marker haplotypes but only in those haplotypes containing SNPs in intron 4 that were positive in the single-locus analysis. No significant associations were observed with ESR2 or with the COMT Val158Met polymorphism, although the significant associations with ESR1 were observed only in those with the Val/Val genotype.

CONCLUSIONS

These are the first positive (albeit preliminary) genetic findings in this reproductive endocrine-related mood disorder and involve the receptor for a hormone that is pathogenically relevant.

Dietary soy protein and isoflavones: no effect on the reproductive tract and minimal positive effect on bone resorption in the intact female Fischer 344 rat

Our previous study evaluating 3 months of feeding soy protein or isoflavones (IF) to intact adult Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats showed no change in bone and the vagina but occasional extensive squamous metaplasia of the uterine glandular epithelium was observed. The current study was designed to characterize further these effects of soy protein or IF on the uterus using the Fischer 344 (F344) rat, a known high responder strain to estrogenic stimuli. Three-month-old intact F344 rats were divided into five groups and fed diets containing either casein, low or high amount of soy protein or casein with low or high amount of IF extract. Body weight, urinary deoxypyridinoline (Dpyr), bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur and lumbar, uterine wet weight and histology of the reproductive tract were evaluated. No significant difference was seen in bone parameters between control and treatment groups except for a lower Dpyr in the high soy and a higher lumbar BMD in the low soy groups. No alteration was seen in the reproductive tract of all treatment groups. Contrary to our hypothesis, the present results suggest that the uterus of the F344 strain is less sensitive to dietary soy protein and IF than that of the SD strain.

Induction of hepatic drug-metabolising enzymes and tamoxifen metabolite profile in relation to administration route during low-dose treatment in nude rats

Tamoxifen is the most used anticancer drug and is approved for chemoprevention. Little is known about the enzyme inducing properties of low-dose regimens and the influence of route of administration. In this study, nude rats received 5 mg/kg/day of tamoxifen orally or a 50 mg continuous-release pellet subcutaneously. The mRNAs for cytochrome P450-enzymes (CYPs), flavin-containing monooxygenase 1 (FMO1) and phase II drug-metabolising enzymes were quantified by real-time RT-PCR. Tamoxifen and metabolite concentrations were measured using HPLC. We observed a significant increase in CYP3A18 and FMO1 mRNA expression levels in the orally treated animals, whereas the increase in CYP3A2 expression did not reach statistical significance (p=0.057). No significant induction of enzyme expression was observed in rats that received subcutaneous (S.c.) treatment. After 33 days the serum levels of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHtam), tamoxifen and N-desmethyltamoxifen (NDtam) in orally treated animals were 1.8+/-0.7, 11.1+/-3.2 and 11.4+/-3.8 ng/ml, respectively. In subcutaneously treated animals, tamoxifen and N-desmethyltamoxifen were detected in tissues, but not in serum. These data demonstrate that in contrast to the subcutaneous administration, low-dose oral tamoxifen induced tamoxifen-metabolising enzymes. Furthermore, the different routes of administration resulted in different serum and tissue levels of tamoxifen and metabolites.

Neoplasms of the reproductive tract: the role of hormone exposure

Cancers of the reproductive system are a major source of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide. Because the uterus, ovaries, and cervix are hormonally responsive tissues, exposure to endogenous or exogenous sex steroids can profoundly affect the carcinogenic process. Animal models developed to date provide valuable but imperfect systems in which to study neoplasms of the reproductive tract. Nonhuman primate models share the unique primate-specific endometrial physiology of humans, but rarely develop neoplasms of the reproductive tract. Therefore a surrogate marker approach is required for the study of hormonally induced cancer risk in primates. Rodents provide practical models in which tumorigenesis can be assayed in a short time and, with appropriate interpretation, can be used for assessment of risk, prevention, and therapeutic strategies. In addition to the spontaneous strain-dependent incidence of female reproductive cancers, the classical chemical and hormonal carcinogenesis models, and the use of xenograft approaches, novel genetically modified animals provide unique insights into relevant molecular mechanisms. Caveats in the use of rodent models include anatomical differences from the human reproductive tract, the greater possibility of different metabolic responses to hormonal agents than humans, strain variations in tumor type and hormonal responsiveness, and unexpected tumor phenotypes in genetically modified animals. Reported nonmammalian models are limited primarily to the study of ovarian carcinogenesis. Recent progress in the understanding of cervical carcinogenesis is encouraging. Unmet needs in this area of research include models of early events in ovarian carcinogenesis and strongly predictive models of endometrial cancer risk. Nonhuman primates remain indispensable for the study of some aspects of reproductive pathophysiology, but the best understanding of carcinogenesis in the reproductive tract requires a broad approach using complementary human, nonhuman primate, and nonprimate studies.