Weekly treatment with irinotecan, folinic acid and infusional 5-fluorouracil (ILF) in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Gastric Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over 95% of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas, which are typically classified based on anatomic location and histologic type. Gastric cancer generally carries a poor prognosis because it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improved survival, and enhanced quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing, especially analysis of HER2 status, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative management, which may include systemic therapy, chemoradiation, and/or best supportive care, is recommended for all patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with localized gastric cancer. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on the management of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease.

Irinotecan, Fluorouracil and Folinic ACID (FOLFIRI) as Effective Treatment Combination for Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer in Poor Clinical Condition

Aims and Background

Irinotecan (CPT-11) has been tested as a single agent in several studies, and response rates of 18-23% have been reported in first-line gastric cancer therapy. In the present study we report the safety and efficacy results combining CPT-11 with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA).

Patients and Methods

Thirty consecutive patients with metastatic gastric cancer, considered in poor clinical condition, were treated with CPT-11 and 5-FU/FA according to the FOLFIRI regimen. All enrolled cases were evaluable for toxicity and drug activity.

Results

The main grade 3-4 toxicity (according to the NCI-CTC criteria) was neutropenia (16%, grade 4 in 1 patient); nonhematological grade 3 toxicity consisted mainly in vomiting and diarrhea reported in 1 patient. No treatment-related serious adverse events were observed. Response was obtained in 12 patients (40%), stable disease in 2 patients (7%), while progression was documented in 16 patients (53%).

Conclusions

These results are very promising, and suggest that the combination of CPT-11 plus 5-FU/FA is active and well tolerated and can be considered as useful treatment in patients with metastatic gastric cancer in poor clinical condition.

Targeted therapies for gastric cancer: current status

Gastric cancer represents one of the most common cancers internationally. Unfortunately the majority of patients still present at an advanced stage, and despite advances in diagnostic and treatment strategies, outcomes still remain poor with high mortality rates despite a decline in incidence. Whilst the utility of classical chemotherapy agents has been explored thoroughly (and continues to be investigated, alone or in various combinations), advances have been slow and the efficacy of these agents has reached a plateau. As such, the focus of recent study has shifted toward developing a greater understanding of the molecular biology of carcinogenesis and the cancer cell phenotype, and, in turn, the development of rationally designed drugs that target molecular aberrancies in signal transduction pathways specific to gastric cancer. These targets include circulating growth and angiogenic factors, cell surface receptors, and other molecules that comprise downstream intracellular signalling pathways, including receptor tyrosine kinases. Therapeutic advances in this area significantly lag behind other solid organ malignancies such as breast and colorectal cancer. This article reviews the role of targeted therapies in gastric cancer, including rationale and mechanism of action, current and emerging data, as single-agent therapy or in combination regimens. A recently published randomized phaseIII trial supporting the use of trastuzumab, an anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu monoclonal antibody, in a selected population of patients is discussed. Therapies that have been evaluated in phase II trials are also reviewed, as well as promising new therapies currently being investigated in preclinical or phase I studies. There is optimism that targeted therapies, whether as single-agent therapy or in combination with traditional therapies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, may yet have an impact on improvement of the overall prognosis of gastric cancer.

An open-label, multicentre biomarker-oriented AIO phase II trial of sunitinib for patients with chemo-refractory advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib monotherapy in pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) was investigated. Preplanned analyses of tumour biomarkers on treatment outcome were performed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received sunitinib 50mg/day for 4 weeks with 2 weeks rest until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were enrolled and treated (safety population, SP). In the intention to treat population (n=51); the ORR was 3.9%, median PFS was 1.28 months [95% CI, 1.18-1.90], median OS was 5.81 months [95% CI, 3.48-12.32], the estimated one-year survival rate was 23.7% [95%CI: 12.8-36.5]. In subgroup analyses, tumour VEGF-C expression compared with no expression was associated with significantly shorter median PFS (1.23 versus 2.86 months, logrank p=0.0119) but there was no difference in tumour control rate (p=0.142). In the SP, serious adverse events occurred in 26 patients, leading to 13 deaths, all sunitinib unrelated. Thirty-eight patients died from progressive disease, nine died <60 days after treatment start.

CONCLUSION

Sunitinib monotherapy was associated with limited tumour response and good/moderate tolerability in this setting.

Prospective, randomized trial comparing 5-FU/LV with or without oxaliplatin as adjuvant treatment following curative resection of gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of FOLFOX4 regimen and LV5Fu2 regimen in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma after curative gastrectomy.

METHODS

Eighty patients with gastric adenocarcinoma after curative gastrectomy were randomized to receive a 2-h infusion of leucovorin (LV; 200mg/m(2)/d) followed by a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus (400mg/m(2)/d) and 22-h infusion (600 mg/m(2)/d) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks, either alone or together with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-h infusion on day 1 (FOLFOX4 regimen or LV5Fu2 regimen). The observation points were recurrence free survival, overall survival and toxicity of the two groups.

RESULTS

All patients had received curative gastrectomy (R0 resection) before received either of the two regimens. The 3-year recurrence free survival rate and the 3-year overall survival rate in FOLFOX4 group were all significantly better than those in the control group (median, 30.0 months vs. 16.0 months, P<0.05; 36.0 months vs. 28.0 months, P<0.05). COX multivariant analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic factors and oxaliplatin was found to be the independent prognostic factor and could improve the survival rate in FOLFOX4 group. Grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 19% in FOLFOX4 group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, gastrointestinal reaction and so on. Three patients in each group were lost to follow up during treatment.

CONCLUSION

FOLFOX4 regimen showed good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma after curative gastrectomy compared with the control group. It may prove to be a suitable alterative regimen in this indication.

A phase II study of irinotecan with biweekly, low dose leucovorin and bolus and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (modified FOLFIRI) as first line therapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

To determine the activity and toxicities of a low-dose leucovorin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regimen, combined with irinotecan and administered every 2 weeks (modified FOLFIRI), as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHOD

Patients were treated with cycles of 150 mg/m irinotecan on day 1 plus 50 mg of LV, followed by a 400 mg/m 5-FU bolus and a 22-hour continuous infusion of 600 mg/m 5-FU on days 1 and 2.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 55 years (range, 29-75 years), and 77% (34/44) of the patients had a performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) of 0 or 1. Of the 44 patients evaluated for their tumor response, 3 patients (6.8%) and 14 patients (31.8%) achieved a complete and partial response, respectively, with an overall response rate of 38.6% (95% confidence interval, 23.7%-53.6%). 13 patients (29.6%) evidenced a stable disease, and 14 patients (31.8%) progressed during the course of the treatment. The median time to progression and overall survival time were 4.9 months (range, 0.9-22.8 months) and 10.3 months (range, 1.2-29.0 months) from the start of the chemotherapy, respectively. A total of 293 cycles were assessed for toxicity. The major hematologic toxicities included grade 1 to 2 anemia (27.6%), neutropenia (48.8%), and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (12.6%). There were 7 cycles of neutropenic fever. Nonhematological toxicities were observed grade 3 vomiting (6.8%), grade 3 diarrhea (4.5%), and grade 3 mucositis (2.3%). We noted no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified FOLFIRI regimen-lowering of irinotecan and LV doses-is a safe and feasible regimen as a first-line therapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer.

Role of low dose capecitabine combined to irinotecan in advanced and metastatic gastric cancer

Chemotherapy has a proven role in advanced and metastatic gastric cancer (AMGC) significantly improving quality of life and prolonging survival compared with best supportive care alone. Multiple regimens have been explored. The choice of treatment should be individualized and tailored to the patient's overall conditions and preference. This manuscript is divided into two sections. The first section illustrates the results of a phase II trial combining weekly irinotecan and low dose capecitabine in the management of untreated AMGC patients. The second section aims to identify the current optimal place of this combination in the management of AMGC in the light of the latest advances. In this manuscript we detail our phase II trial which showed objective response rate of 47% (15 patients), disease stabilization of 28% (9 patients), and overall tumor control rate of 75% (24 patients). Median time to progression and overall survival were 5.8 and 8 months, respectively. Grades III-IV toxicities were reported in 7 cases. Low-dose capecitabine plus irinotecan is effective in the treatment of AMGC with an acceptable toxicity profile. Compared to the recent published data, this combination is indicated in the second-line treatment of AMGC and in the first-line treatment where a contraindication for docetaxel- and/or oxaliplatin-based regimen is present.

A general review of the role of irinotecan (CPT11) in the treatment of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of gastric tumor is generally poor because most tumors are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Chemotherapy has a proven palliative role in advanced gastric cancer and several combination regimens were explored in the last 10 yr. Nevertheless, none of them showed a convincing improvement resulting in an enhancement of response rate and overall survival without discrimination of the quality of life. Irinotecan (CPT11) has been evaluated in multiple trials alone or in combined therapy with promising results and good tolerance. Thus, a review of the importance and impact of CPT11 in this indication is detailed.

METHODS

This article reviews the evidence for the use of CPT11 in the treatment of gastric cancer based on a computerized MEDLINE search of literature published until August 2006 leading to a total of 91 publications.

RESULTS

CPT11 was frequently used and showed a good response rate varying from 14% to 23% as single agent and 45% to 70% in combination with a median time to progression of 3 mo in single agent and 4-6 mo in combination, and median overall survival of approx 7 mo in single agent and up to 10.58 mo in combination.

CONCLUSION

The overall response of irinotecan-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer was shown to be as effective as other combined chemotherapy. The hematological and digestive toxicity were tolerable and mild, especially in weekly regimen. Thus, irinotecan-based chemotherapy should be considered as one of the preferred choices in front line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.

Irinotecan combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin for the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma as the first-line chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Because of insufficient activity and high toxicity of current chemotherapy regimens in advanced gastric cancer (AGC), there is a need for newer regimens.

METHODS

Twenty-five chemonaive patients with AGC have been treated with FOLFIRI regimen consisting of irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) over 30 min on day 1 combined with leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) over 2 h followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) as bolus and 600 mg/m(2) as a 22-hour infusion on day 1 and 2. The treatment was administered every 14th day until progression or intolerable toxicity.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (17 male, 8 female; 22 patients with PS 0-1 and 3 patients with PS 2), median age 54 (range 25-77), received a total of 230 courses of chemotherapy (median 9; range 1-18). Objective responses were observed in 9 patients (36%), all being partial. Median progression-free survival, 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 8.6 months, 28.4% and 15.3%, respectively. Median overall survival, 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 11.6 months, 48.0% and 17.8%, respectively. As serious adverse events, grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 5 patients (20.0%), grade 3 diarrhea in 4 patients (16.0%). No treatment-related death occurred.

CONCLUSION

FOLFIRI regimen is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity for the treatment of AGC.

Recent developments in the systemic therapy of advanced gastroesophageal malignancies

Cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract are a common cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality. The prognosis for patients with these cancers remains poor and only a minority of patients are cured. Systemic therapy has been used to treat patients with advanced disease but outcomes have not improved dramatically in the past few decades. Newer, more effective agents are desperately needed, and agents such as the taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel), irinotecan, oxaliplatin and capecitabine have recently shown some promise. In addition, molecularly targeted, non-cytotoxic therapies are being evaluated with the hope of improving the available therapeutic options. This article reviews the current clinical data regarding systemic therapy for patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Challenges in the treatment of gastrointestinal tumours

In the last 20 years there have been many breakthroughs in the treatment of gastrointestinal tumours. In this review we have considered the three most important subgroups of gastrointestinal tumours (colorectal, gastric and pancreatic cancer), focusing on the state-of-the-art treatments.

Chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Metastatic gastric cancer remains a non-curative disease. Palliative chemotherapy has been demonstrated to prolong survival without quality of life compromise. Many single-agents and combinations have been confirmed to be active in the treatment of metastatic disease. Objective response rates ranged from 10-30% for single-agent therapy and 30-60% for polychemotherapy. Results of phase II and III studies are reviewed in this paper as well as the potential efficacy of new drugs. For patients with localized disease, the role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy is discussed. Most studies on adjuvant chemotherapy failed to demonstrate a survival advantage, and therefore, it is not considered as standard treatment in most centres. Adjuvant immunochemotherapy has been developed fundamentally in Korea and Japan. A meta-analysis of phase III trials with OK-432 suggested that immunochemotherapy may improve survival of patients with curatively resected gastric cancer. Based on the results of US Intergroup 0116 study, postoperative chemoradiation has been accepted as standard care in patients with resected gastric cancer in North America. However, the results are somewhat confounded by the fact that patients underwent less than a recommended D1 lymph node dissection and the pattern of recurrence suggested a positive effect derived from local radiotherapy without any effect on micrometastatic disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy remains experimental, but several phase II studies are showing promising results. Phase III trials are needed.

Randomised phase II evaluation of irinotecan plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (ILF) vs 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and etoposide (ELF) in untreated metastatic gastric cancer

An open-label randomised comparison of efficacy and tolerability of irinotecan plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (ILF) with etoposide plus 5-FU/LV (ELF) in patients with untreated metastatic or locally advanced gastric cancer. One cycle of ILF comprised six once-weekly infusions of irinotecan 80 mg m⁻², LV 500 mg m⁻², 24-h 5-FU 2000 mg m⁻², and ELF comprised three once-daily doses of etoposide 120 mg m⁻², LV 300 mg m⁻², 5-FU 500 mg m⁻². In all, 56 patients received ILF and 58 ELF. Median age was 62 years, Karnofsky performance 90%, and disease status was comparable for both arms. The objective clinical response rates after 14 weeks treatment (primary end point) were 30% for ILF and 17% for ELF (risk ratio (RR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29–1.13, P=0.0766). Overall response rates over the entire treatment period for ILF and ELF were 43 and 24%, respectively (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.97; P=0.0467). For ILF and ELF, respectively, median progression-free survival was 4.5 vs 2.3 months, time to treatment failure was 3.6 vs 2.2 months (P=0.4542), and overall survival was 10.8 vs 8.3 months (P=0.2818). Both regimens were well tolerated, the main grade 3/4 toxicities being diarrhoea (18%, ILF) and neutropenia (57%, ELF). The data from this randomised phase II study indicate that ILF provides a better response rate than ELF, and that ILF should be investigated further for the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer.

Gemcitabine (GEM) plus oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX-4) in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

oxaliplatin in combination with folinic acid (FA) and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has shown significant anti-tumor activity in gastric cancer patients (FOLFOX). Previous studies have shown that gemcitabine (GEM), a new fluorinated anti-metabolite, enhances the individual anti-tumor activity of either 5-FU or oxaliplatin. We have therefore designed a multi-center phase II trial in order to test a novel GEM+FOLFOX-4 regimen in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

we enrolled 36 patients, 28 males and 8 females, with an average age of 64.4 years (range 37-78), who received bi-weekly treatment with GEM (1,000 mg/m2 on day 1), levo-FA (100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2), a 5-FU (400 mg/m2) bolus injection followed by 22-h continuous infusion (800 mg/m2) on days 1 and 2, and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 in a 4-6 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion before the second FUFA administration on day 2.

RESULTS

the most frequent side effect was grade 1-2 hematological toxicity and late sensorial neurotoxicity. Two patients developed hypersensitivity to oxaliplatin while another developed an aseptic eosinophilic pneumonitis. Two patients refused to continue the treatment after two cycles of chemotherapy and were lost at the follow-up. Among the remaining 34 patients four achieved a complete response, 15 a partial response, 12 had a stable disease and three progressed.

CONCLUSIONS

these results may grant the rationale to evaluate this multi-drug combination in randomized phase III trials in advanced gastric cancer.