Virological and immunological responses to once-daily dosing of didanosine in combination with stavudine. AI454-143 Team

Toxicities associated with dual nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor regimens in HIV-infected children

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) therapy includes a backbone of nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Toxicities associated with NRTIs are not fully defined in children.

METHODS

We studied 2233 children < or =13 years of age who were perinatally infected with HIV and were receiving > or =2 NRTIs, to determine the relative toxicities of the 5 most common NRTI pairs: zidovudine (ZDV)/lamivudine (3TC), ZDV/didanosine (ddI), stavudine (d4T)/3TC, d4T/ddI, and ddI/3TC. Incidence rates for clinical and laboratory toxicities were estimated, and NRTI pairs were compared with regard to the time to the first toxicity.

RESULTS

The most common clinical toxicities noted were hepatitis, peripheral neuropathy, lipodystrophy/lipoatrophy, and pancreatitis, whereas the most common laboratory toxicities were an elevated anion gap, an increased total amylase level, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Overall, regimens containing ZDV were associated with a significantly lower rate of clinical toxicities than were those containing d4T (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; P = .02) ); regimens containing ddI were associated with a significantly lower rate of laboratory toxicities than were those containing 3TC (adjusted HR, 0.78; P = .04). ZDV/3TC was associated with a lower rate of clinical toxicities than were d4T/ddI and ddI/3TC and with a higher rate of laboratory toxicities than was ZDV/ddI. ZDV/ddI was associated with a lower rate of clinical toxicities than was d4T/3TC.

CONCLUSIONS

In children, regimens containing ZDV have less toxicity than do those containing d4T, thereby supporting their use in first-line regimens. D4T/3TC, d4T/ddI, and ddI/3TC have similar toxicity rates and are appropriate for second-line therapy.

A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of two HAART strategies at two years in antiretroviral naive patients

BACKGROUND

The use of HAART combining 2 nucleoside analogues reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus one protease inhibitor (PI) or 2 NRTIs + 1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) has shown comparable efficacy. The study was designed to compare long term (2 years) effectiveness of two antiretroviral (ARV) treatment strategies in patients not previously treated: starting with a nelfinavir based HAART switching to nevirapine in case of failure or side effects or the reverse sequence.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, open label clinical trial enrolled ARV-naïve HIV patients with CD4 counts below 500 cells/mm3. They were randomly assigned to start ddI + d4T + nelfinavir (switching to ZDV + 3TC + NEV in case of failure or toxicity) (PI-NEV arm) or ddI + d4T + nevirapine, switching to ZDV + 3TC + NFV in case of failure or toxicity (NEV-PI arm). The primary study endpoint was the Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to failure after switching to second regimen if necessary (considering failure as two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA determinations above 200 copies/mL, death, a new category C event or toxicity leading to treatment discontinuation of the second regimen) after a minimum follow-up of two years.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients were evaluable (67 and 70 in the PI-NEV and NEV-PI arms respectively). Baseline characteristics did not differ among groups. Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to failure did not show differences between the two arms neither in the on-treatment (OT) analysis (log rank test, p = 0.81) nor in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis (p = 0.58). At 24 months, the estimated proportion of patients free of failure were 72% and 66% respectively in the PI-NEV and NEV-PI arms OT analysis (p = 0.54) and 73% and 64% in the PI-NEV and NEV-PI arms in the ITT analysis (p = 0.49). The difference in the median in CD4+ lymphocyte count at 24 months was not significantly different in the two groups: 393 and 307 CD4 cells/mm3 in the PI-NEV and NEV-PI arms respectively (p = 0.167). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) in the two arms was very similar: 50 (75%) in the PI-NEV and 54 (70%) in the NEV-PI group, as it was for grade 3-4 AEs leading to drug switching.

CONCLUSION

At two years both treatments strategies (PI-NEV vs NEV-PI) had a high and comparable efficacy and were generally well tolerated.

Prenatal developmental toxicity evaluation of 2',3'-dideoxyinosine (ddI) and 2',3'-didehydro-3'-deoxythymidine (d4T) co-administered to Swiss Albino (CD-1) mice

BACKGROUND

In pregnant women, antiretroviral drugs improve maternal health and reduce vertical transmission of human immunodeficiency virus to the infant. However, few nonclinical studies have examined the potential for adverse drug interactions.

METHODS

On gestational days (GD) 6-16, mice were dosed with vehicle, ddI (360, 1440, or 2,880 mg/kg/day, p.o.), d4T (60, 240, or 480), or ddI/d4T combinations (360/60, 1,440/240, or 2,880/480). Daily doses were divided into two equal parts that were administered >or=6-hr apart. Body weight, clinical signs, and feed consumption were monitored. Pregnancies (22-24/group) were confirmed at necropsy. Maternal liver and gravid uterine weights (GUW), uterine implants (resorption, live or dead fetus), fetal body weight, gender, and morphologic anomalies (external, visceral, skeletal) were recorded.

RESULTS

Maternal body weight, clinical signs, and GUW were unaffected. Maternal weight change corrected for GUW was greater than controls at 60 and 480 d4T. Relative feed consumption during treatment was increased relative to controls at 1,440 and 2,880 ddI and 2,880/480 ddI/d4T. Relative maternal liver weight was elevated above controls at 240 and 480 d4T and 2,880/480 ddI/d4T, and above the constituent dose of ddI at 1,440/240 and 2,880/480 ddI/d4T. Liver weight was not affected by ddI and there was no significant drug interaction. Prenatal mortality and morphologic anomalies were not increased. Fetal body weight showed only a decreasing trend for ddI/d4T, no effect for ddI or d4T, and no statistically significant drug interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

In pregnant mice, ddI/d4T combinations were not associated with well-defined developmental toxicity or adverse drug interactions.

Update on didanosine

Didanosine (ddl) has been a cornerstone of HIV management since it was made available in October 1991. Didanosine was originally introduced as an alternative to zidovudine (ZDV) for patients who were intolerant of ZDV or experienced disease progression during ZDV monotherapy. Didanosine is now used extensively as an integral component of multidrug combination regimens in both adults and children with HIV infection, and is now available for once-daily administration in the United States, Canada, and Europe. The recently approved Videx EC is an enteric-coated didanosine capsule dosed as one capsule, once daily. This paper provides an update of recently published studies on the use of ddl in combination anti-HIV therapy. In particular, these studies examine the rationale for the use of ddl as first-line anti-HIV therapy, and describe newer findings concerning its long-term efficacy, side effects, compliance, resistance, and once-daily use. The increased survival of HIV-infected patients is largely attributed to the introduction of the triple combination drug therapy but is probably also due to the long-term clinical efficacy of ddl.

Simplified regimens for treating HIV infection and AIDS

PURPOSE

To review the variables that greatly affect adherence to the complex treatment regimens used in HIV disease and to examine available options that could improve patient outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

Comprehensive review of current medical and scientific literature, drug-prescribing literature, and randomized clinical trials of drug treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective treatment of HIV infection is dependent on consistent adherence to prescribed antiretroviral medications. A large pill burden, multiple daily doses, and adverse events are some of the complexities that negatively impact patient adherence. For example, lipodystrophy and hyperlipidemia are two serious side effects associated with some agents. Once-daily antiretroviral agents offer many advantages over historical treatment options but are associated with possible drawbacks.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Currently, four single agents are available for once-daily administration, and a few others are under investigation. In addition, combination therapy with either dual or boosted protease inhibitor regimens is becoming a popular way of overcoming the poor pharmacokinetic characteristics of individual protease inhibitors.

Antiviral activity of enteric-coated didanosine, stavudine, and nelfinavir versus zidovudine plus lamivudine and nelfinavir

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the activity and safety of capsules containing enteric-coated beadlets of didanosine given once daily with stavudine and nelfinavir with that of a standard reference triple drug regimen of zidovudine plus lamivudine and nelfinavir.

DESIGN

Multinational, 49-site, prospective, open-label, randomized, two-arm comparison study.

PARTICIPANTS

HIV-infected subjects with limited or no previous antiretroviral therapy who had plasma HIV RNA levels of >or=2000 copies/mL and CD4 cell counts of >or=200/mm3 (511 were randomized to treatment groups, and 352 completed the study).

INTERVENTIONS

Triple antiretroviral therapy for 48 weeks: didanosine EC (400 mg once daily), stavudine (40 mg twice daily), and nelfinavir (750 mg three times daily) or a twice-daily coformulation of zidovudine (300 mg) plus lamivudine (150 mg) and nelfinavir (750 mg three times daily).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Proportion of subjects with HIV RNA levels of <400 copies/mL at week 48 based on an "intent-to-treat, missing = treatment failure" analysis.

RESULTS

The two treatment groups were similar in the proportion of treatment responders (i.e., HIV RNA level of <400 copies/mL), with 54% of subjects in the didanosine EC and zidovudine plus lamivudine treatment groups responding at week 48. Results of other analyses supported those of the primary analysis. The two study regimens were associated with similar numbers of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The antiviral efficacy of a triple combination regimen containing once-daily didanosine EC is similar to that of a reference triple combination regimen.

Virological and Immunological Responses to a Once-a-Day Antiretroviral Regimen with Didanosine, Lamivudine and Efavirenz

Current antiretroviral drugs cannot eradicate HIV infections, and persons living with HIV are often faced with very demanding daily therapeutic schedules that can induce poor adherence. More conveniently dosed and patient-friendly regimens are needed. We investigated, in this 48-week pilot study, a once-a-day highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen of didanosine, lamivudine and efavirenz. Seventy-five consecutive antiretroviral-naive subjects were enrolled. Over the 48-week period, plasma HIV-RNA levels declined sharply, with a median decrease at the end of the observation time >3.4 log copies/ml. The proportion of patients achieving a plasma HIV-RNA level below the limit of detection (50 copies/ml) was 77% (intention to treat analysis) at the end of the study period. The mean CD4 cell count increased steadily over time from 251 to 459 cells/μl. Antiviral efficacy was similar in patients with a baseline HIV-RNA level above or below 100 000 copies/ml. However, patients with a baseline CD4 cell count <200 cells/μl showed a significantly worse virological response than that observed in patients with higher baseline CD4 counts. Overall 15 patients interrupted therapy. In four cases treatment interruption was due to lack of treatment response; three additional patients were lost to follow-up or withdrew informed consent. Eight patients stopped therapy because of adverse events. The once-daily combination of didanosine, lamivudine and efavirenz resulted in sustained viral suppression and was well-accepted by patients. This regimen may offer advantages in selected difficult-to-treat populations, allows directly observed therapy and can be a safe and effective alternative in antiretroviral-naive patients. These encouraging pilot results need to be confirmed in a comparative clinical trial.

Directly observed therapy for the treatment of people with human immunodeficiency virus infection: a work in progress

The principle of directly observed therapy (DOT) has its roots in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB), for which DOT programs have improved cure rates in hard-to-reach populations. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and TB affect similar populations, and there are concerns about both regarding the development of drug resistance associated with poor adherence to therapy. Accordingly, DOT may benefit certain HIV-infected people who have difficulty adhering to highly active antiretroviral therapy. However, important differences exist in the treatment of these diseases that raise questions about how DOT can be adapted to HIV therapy. DOT for management of HIV infection has been effective among prisoners and in pilot programs in Haiti, Rhode Island, and Florida. Although DOT can successfully treat HIV infection in marginalized populations in the short term, a multitude of questions remain. This review provides an account of the preliminary development of DOT programs for the treatment of HIV-infected individuals.

Daily dosing of highly active antiretroviral therapy

Complex treatment schedules for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, which can have a high pill burden and can include multiple daily doses, in addition to the adverse effects that the medications can cause, may reduce patient adherence to therapy. Reduced adherence prevents achievement of the desired goal of full suppression of HIV replication, and it also promotes the development of drug-resistant strains of HIV. Thus, the focus of treatment has shifted toward the use of simpler regimens. A major strategy is the development of medications and regimens for management of HIV infection that can be taken once per day. The goal of such a strategy is to improve convenience and optimize adherence, which is critical to maximizing the likelihood of sustained virologic response. Several studies involving regimens with once-daily dosing, which have involved both available agents and agents in development, have yielded promising results. In comparison with standard regimens, which involve dosing 2 or 3 times daily, the regimens with once-daily dosing improved tolerability while maintaining efficacy and safety. The results are expected to increase adherence rates among patients, reduce the incidence of antiretroviral-resistant variants of HIV, and improve the clinical outcomes during a prolonged treatment course.

Efficacy and safety of stavudine plus didanosine in asymptomatic HIV-infected children with plasma HIV RNA below 50,000 copies per milliliter

BACKGROUND

Simple antiretroviral drug combinations might provide a comparable benefit to standard triple regimens in patients with mild HIV disease, because poor adherence and toxicities often compromise the sustained benefit of the latest triple regimens, especially when protease inhibitors are used. Bad adherence is the main cause of virological failure in HIV-positive children. The activity and safety of a double combination of nucleosides with high genetic barrier for resistance (stavudine plus didanosine) was assessed in children with nonadvanced HIV disease.

METHOD

From February 1998 to March 1999, 16 children were enrolled in six Spanish hospitals in a trial in which didanosine (180 mg/m2/day) and stavudine (2 mg/Kg/day) were administered for 48 weeks to asymptomatic naive children with plasma HIV RNA below 50,000 copies/mL and CD4 counts above 15%. Genotypic resistance to nucleoside analogues was examined at baseline and at the end of the study.

RESULTS

At baseline, median age was 6.5 years (range, 2-14). The absolute and percentage mean CD4 counts were 864 and 32%, respectively (z score: -0.48 and -1.1). Mean plasma viral load was 4.05 log. No clinical events occurred during the 1-year study period. Minor side effects were recorded in two thirds of children, although none led to drug discontinuation. Lipoatrophy was not recognized in any of the participants. Plasma HIV RNA below 400 copies/mL was reached by 43% and 44% of patients at 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. The z score for absolute and percentage CD4 count increased significantly at 48 weeks (+0.63 and +0.97, respectively) in respect to baseline (p <.05). Resistance mutations linked to didanosine (L74V or M184V) or stavudine (V75T) were not recognized and neither were multinucleoside resistant genotypes (151 complex or 69 inserts). However, four children developed AZT-like mutations T215Y and/or M41L.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with a dual combination of didanosine plus stavudine in naive children with nonadvanced HIV disease is safe and provides a satisfactory virological outcome at 1 year. Toxicity and drug resistance seem to occur rarely when this combination is used, which allows good adherence and spares other future treatment options.

Didanosine once daily: potential for expanded use

Factors affecting patient adherence to therapy, such as frequent daily dosing and complex dosing schedules, are widely understood to be key obstacles to the durability of effective anti-HIV therapy. Didanosine, a nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) that is a core component of combination antiretroviral regimens, is currently indicated for twice-daily dosing. However, the active metabolite of didanosine (2',3'-dideoxyadenosine-5'-triphosphate) has a long intracellular half-life that supports the use of didanosine in a more patient-friendly, once-daily dosing schedule. Clinical studies in which didanosine was administered either once or twice daily, as monotherapy or in combination with another NRTI, have demonstrated the equivalence of both dosing schedules, with respect to safety and tolerability, virologic and immunologic endpoints, and short-term clinical effects (e.g., weight gain). Preliminary results from recent studies support the clinical efficacy and utility of once-daily didanosine in combination antiretroviral regimens that provide maximal drug exposure, while allowing for once- or twice-daily dosing of all component drugs.

Comparison of twice-daily stavudine plus once- or twice-daily didanosine and nevirapine in early stages of HIV infection: the scan study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of once-daily didanosine and nevirapine plus twice-daily stavudine versus twice-daily administration of all three drugs.

METHODS

This open-label, randomized, multicentre study enrolled 94 antiretroviral-naive patients with chronic HIV infection, CD4+ cell counts > 500 x 10(6) cells/l, and viral loads > 5000 copies/ml. Patients were treated with either 40 mg stavudine (twice daily) plus 400 mg didanosine (once daily) and 400 mg nevirapine (once daily) or 40 mg stavudine (twice daily) plus 200 mg didanosine (twice daily) and 200 mg nevirapine (twice daily).

RESULTS

After 12 months, 68% of patients who received twice-daily didanosine and nevirapine had viral loads < 200 copies/ml in the intention-to-treat and 79% in the on-treatment analysis, respectively. The corresponding values for patients treated with didanosine and nevirapine, taken once-daily, were 73 and 85%. The percentages of patients in each group with viral loads < 5 copies/ml at 12 months were 40% (once daily ) and 45% (twice daily) for the intention-to-treat analysis. Five of 11 patients (45%) with plasma viral loads < 5 copies/ml at 12 months had detectable virus in tonsillar tissue. Genotypic resistance to nevirapine was noted in seven of the 14 patients with detectable viral load at month 12. Mean changes in CD4+ cell counts for patients treated with stavudine plus once- or twice-daily didanosine and nevirapine were 154 and 132 x 10(6) cells/l, respectively. Treatment was interrupted due to adverse events in seven patients (8%) (four who received once-daily didanosine and nevirapine and three treated with twice-daily doses).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of twice-daily stavudine plus once-daily didanosine and nevirapine was as safe and well tolerated as twice-daily administration of all three agents. Both regimens were equally effective in reducing viral loads and in increasing CD4+ cell counts.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of once-daily regimens of soft-gel capsule saquinavir plus minidose ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus-negative adults

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitors have dramatically improved treatment options for HIV infection, but frequent dosing may impact adherence to highly active antiretroviral treatment regimens (HAART). Previous studies demonstrated that combined therapy with ritonavir and saquinavir allows a decrease in frequency of saquinavir dosing to twice daily. In this study, we evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of combining once-daily doses of the soft-gel capsule (SGC) formulation of saquinavir (saquinavir-SGC) and minidose ritonavir. Forty-four healthy HIV-negative volunteers were randomized into groups receiving once-daily doses of saquinavir-SGC (1,200 to 1,800 mg) plus ritonavir (100 to 200 mg) or a control group receiving only saquinavir-SGC (1,200 mg) three times daily. Saquinavir-SGC alone and saquinavir-SGC-ritonavir combinations were generally well tolerated, and there were no safety concerns. Addition of ritonavir (100 mg) to saquinavir-SGC (1,200 to 1,800 mg/day) increased the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for saquinavir severalfold, and the intersubject peak concentration in plasma and AUC variability were reduced compared to those achieved with saquinavir-SGC alone (3,600 mg/day), while trough saquinavir levels (24 h post-dose) were substantially higher than the 90% inhibitory concentration calculated from HIV-1 clinical isolates. Neither increasing the saquinavir-SGC dose to higher than 1,600 mg nor increasing ritonavir from 100 to 200 mg appeared to further enhance the AUC. These results suggest that an all once-daily HAART regimen, utilizing saquinavir-SGC plus a more tolerable low dose of ritonavir, may be feasible. Studies of once-daily saquinavir-SGC (1,600 mg) in combination with ritonavir (100 mg) in HIV-infected patients are underway.

Long-term hydroxyurea in combination with didanosine and stavudine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Swiss HIV Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

In 1998 we reported on a randomized comparison between stavudine plus didanosine plus placebo versus stavudine plus didanosine plus hydroxyurea (HU), in patients with a CD4 count of 200-500 x 10(6) cells/l. After 3 months, the HU group had a higher proportion of patients with viral load < 200 x 10 cells/l. At the end of the 3 months blinded period, patients in the placebo group had the option to add HU if their viral load remained > 200 x 10(6) cells/l. We report results after 24 months.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were randomized to the HU arm, and a further 30 elected to add HU after 12 weeks. Twenty-four months after the start of the trial, only 25% of the 72 patients originally randomized to HU, and 20% of the 30 who added HU after week 12, were still taking it. The reasons for stopping HU were: lack of efficacy (45%), adverse events (37%) and patient or physician preference (18%). Side effects were more frequent in the didanosine/stavudine/HU group than in the didanosine/stavudine group: neuropathy (35 versus 15%, P< 0.02), fatigue (22 versus 7%, P< 0.01), and nausea or vomiting (26 versus 9%, P< 0.01). Of those who had discontinued HU, 73% were taking three drugs including a protease inhibitor. Patients who had started HU were compared with similar patients who had started protease inhibitors in the Swiss cohort. The probability of stopping HU was higher than the probability of stopping nelfinavir or indinavir, and similar to the probability of stopping ritonavir.

CONCLUSION

HU increased the antiviral effect of stavudine plus didanosine. However, side effects were more frequent, and after 24 months the majority of patients had switched to protease inhibitor regimens.

Didanosine dosed once daily is equivalent to twice daily dosing for patients on double or triple combination antiretroviral therapy. The AI454-147 Team

OBJECTIVE

To compare the antiviral activity, effect on CD4 cell count, and tolerability of didanosine (ddI) administered once daily and twice daily in HIV-1-infected patients receiving ddI with stavudine or zidovudine, with or without a protease inhibitor. The study was designed to demonstrate that once-daily dosing of ddI was not inferior to twice-daily dosing.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label, multicenter, two-arm study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

121 HIV-1-infected adults on a stable regimen including ddI (twice daily) during the previous 3 months with a stable viral load <10,000 copies/ml started therapy. Of these, 62 were randomized to switch to a combination that included ddI once daily and 59 to continue with ddI twice daily. The ddI dose was 400 mg/day (250 mg/day if body weight was <60 kg). The primary efficacy analysis compared the time-averaged difference (TAD) between the two treatment regimens in change from baseline log10 plasma HIV-1 RNA levels over 24 weeks of therapy, with an equivalence margin between the two treatment groups of <0.5 log10 copies/ml.

RESULTS

At week 24, the mean plasma HIV-1 RNA level had increased by 0.31 and 0.17 log10 copies/ml in the ddI once-daily and ddI twice-daily groups, respectively. The time-averaged difference between the two groups in change from baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA levels over 24 weeks was (0.05 log10 copies/ml (95% confidence interval, -0.21 to +0.12 log10 copies/ml), indicating that the antiviral activity of ddI once daily is similar to that of ddI twice daily. After 24 weeks of treatment, changes from baseline in CD4 cell counts were similar in the two groups. Both regimens were generally well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily and twice-daily ddI are equally effective at reducing plasma HIV-1 RNA levels when used in a combination regimen with stavudine or zidovudine, with or without a protease inhibitor.

A comparison of stavudine, didanosine and indinavir with zidovudine, lamivudine and indinavir for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infected individuals: selection of thymidine analog regimen therapy (START II)

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of stavudine (d4T), didanosine (ddI) and indinavir (IDV) with zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC) and IDV in HIV-1 infected patients.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label.

SETTING

Fourteen HIV Clinical Research Centers.

PATIENTS

Two-hundred and five patients with less than 4 weeks antiretroviral treatment, naive to 3TC and protease inhibitors and with CD4 cell counts > or = 200 x 10(6)/l and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels > or = 10,000 copies/ml.

INTERVENTIONS

Stavudine 40 mg and ddI 200 mg twice daily plus IDV 800 mg every 8 h compared with ZDV 200 mg every 8 h or 300 mg twice daily, 3TC 150 mg twice daily plus IDV.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels < 500 copies/ml and < or = 50 copies/ml and changes in CD4 cell counts were compared.

RESULTS

In an analysis of the primary endpoint, 61% of patients on d4T + ddI + IDV and 45% of patients on ZDV + 3TC + IDV had all HIV-1 RNA values obtained between weeks 40 and 48 < 500 copies/ml [95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between proportions, 1.7-30.3%; P = 0.038]. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the percentage of all patients randomized with all HIV-1 RNA levels < 500 copies/ml between 40 and 48 weeks were 53% for the d4T + ddI + IDV arm and 41% for the ZDV + 3TC + IDV arm (95% CI, -1.4% to 25.7%; P = 0.068). At 48 weeks 41% and 35% were < or = 50 copies/ml for the stavudine- and ZDV-containing arms respectively (P > 0.2). The median time-weighted average increases in CD4 cells count over 48 weeks were 150 x 10(6)/l cells for the d4T arm and 106 x 10(6)/l cells for the ZDV arm (P= 0.001). The occurrence of serious adverse events was not significantly different between arms.

CONCLUSION

The combination of stavudine, ddl and IDV resulted in potent antiretroviral effects over a 48-week period, comparable or superior to zidovudine, 3TC and IDV supporting the use of stavudine, ddI and a protease inhibitor as an initial antiretroviral treatment.

A randomised, open-label comparison of three highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens including two nucleoside analogues and indinavir for previously untreated HIV-1 infection: the OzCombo1 study

BACKGROUND

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) including two nucleoside analogues and a potent protease inhibitor is standard of care initial therapy for HIV-infected adults. The best-tolerated and most potent initial HAART regimen is unknown and was investigated in this study.

METHODS

One hundred and nine HIV-infected adults with no prior antiretroviral therapy, and CD4 lymphocyte counts < 500 x 10(6) cells/l or plasma HIV RNA > 30,000 copies/ml were randomized to zidovudine-lamivudine-indinavir (ZDV-3TC-IDV), stavudine-lamivudine-indinavir (d4T-3TC-IDV) or stavudine-didanosine-indinavir (d4T-ddI-IDV) for 52 weeks. The primary endpoints were plasma HIV RNA and drug-related adverse events. Other assessments were overall safety, adherence and adverse events, CD4 lymphocyte counts, cutaneous delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses and quality of life (Euroqol).

RESULTS

Only 58% patients had HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml plasma at 12 months, with no significant difference between the three regimes (P = 0.34). Drug-related adverse events sufficiently severe to warrant drug discontinuation were less common (P = 0.06) in patients receiving d4T-3TC-IDV (18%) than in those receiving ZDV-3TC-IDV (34%) or d4T-ddI-IDV (41%). The percentages of patients who remained on their assigned therapy with plasma HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml at 52 weeks were 60% with d4T-3TC-IDV, 53% with ZDV-3TC-IDV and 35% with d4T-ddI-IDV. Virological failure at 52 weeks was more likely in those whose adherence was estimated to be < 100% in the first 4 weeks of therapy (P = 0.02), but not in those who developed grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events. At 52 weeks, the mean CD4 lymphocyte count increase was 200 x 10(6) cells/l with only 7% of patients having counts lower than at baseline; DTH responses improved but remained clinically impaired in most patients. Quality of life improved significantly in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial HAART regimens including IDV failed to suppress plasma HIV RNA to < 50 copies/ml in > 40% patients after only 12 months of therapy although there was significant overall improvement immunologically and in quality of life. The type of dual nucleoside combination used was less important in predicting virological failure than was imperfect adherence early in therapy. Consideration should be given to modifying a HAART regimen relatively early in non-adherent patients.

The Virgo Study: Nevirapine, Didanosine and Stavudine Combination Therapy in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-1-Infected Adults

The virological and immunological efficacy of the triple regimen containing nevirapine (once or twice daily), didanosine (once daily) and stavudine, in antiretroviral-naive patients infected with HIV-1, was evaluated in an open-label, prospective, non-randomized, multi-centre, 52-week study. The first 60 patients (VIRGO I) received nevirapine as the standard dose, 200 mg twice daily; the subsequent 40 patients (VIRGO II) received nevirapine at a dose of 400 mg once daily. All patients received 400 mg of didanosine once daily and 40 mg of stavudine twice daily, adjusted for body weight. At baseline, the median CD4 cell count and plasma viral load (pVL) were 414 cells/mm3 and 4.59 log10 copies/ml in VIRGO I, and 412 cells/mm3 and 4.87 log10 copies/ml in VIRGO II. Using an intent-to-treat, ‘non-completer equals failure’, analysis, 78% (95% CI, 68–88%) of patients in VIRGO I and 68% (95% CI, 53–83%) of those in VIRGO II had a pVL <500 copies/ml at 24 weeks; the proportions achieving a pVL of <50 copies/ml were 62% (95% CI, 50–74%) and 50% (95% CI, 35–65%), respectively. The week 24 median CD4 cell count increase was 168 cells/mm3 (VIRGO I) and 139 cells/mm3 (VIRGO II). At week 52, 39/45 (87%) of VIRGO I patients had pVL <500 copies/ml and 30/45 (67%) <50 copies/ml. Of the 100 patients, 44 experienced grade 2 to 4 adverse events; 20 permanently discontinued study medication because of an adverse event. Combination therapy with the three reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors stavudine, once-daily didanosine and either once- or twice-daily nevirapine could be considered as an alternative option for first-line antiretroviral therapy.

Didanosine: an updated review of its use in HIV infection

Didanosine, like zidovudine, stavudine and lamivudine, is a nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI). In the target cell for HIV, didanosine is converted to its active moiety, dideoxyadenosine-5'-triphosphate (ddATP), which inhibits HIV reverse transcriptase and terminates viral DNA growth. It is now well established that didanosine therapy produces beneficial effects on virological and immunological markers of HIV disease and improves clinical outcome in adults or children with HIV infection. In numerous clinical trials, pronounced and sustained decreases in plasma HIV RNA levels and increases in CD4+ cell counts occurred in previously untreated or antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients treated with didanosine in combination with at least 1 other antiretroviral drug; zidovudine, stavudine, lamivudine, nevirapine, nelfinavir and hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide) are among the drugs that have been given in combination with didanosine. Of note, HIV RNA levels decreased to below the limits of detection in some patients receiving triple or dual therapy with didanosine-containing regimens. In double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, triple therapy with didanosine, zidovudine and nevirapine was significantly more effective than dual therapy with various combinations of these agents in improving surrogate disease markers in treatment-naive patients and in delaying disease progression or death in treatment-experienced patients with advanced disease. Improvements in virological and immunological markers were greater with didanosine-containing triple regimens than with dual therapy or monotherapy in comparative trials. Triple therapy with didanosine, stavudine and indinavir showed efficacy similar to that of various other triple therapy regimens in nonblind comparative trials. Comparator regimens included combinations of stavudine, lamivudine plus indinavir, zidovudine, lamivudine plus indinavir and didanosine, stavudine and nevirapine. Combination therapy with didanosine plus hydroxyurea as dual therapy or with a third agent produced marked and sustained decreases in HIV RNA levels in the plasma and in lymph nodes. Combination therapy with didanosine and zidovudine delays disease progression and prolongs survival in patients with intermediate or advanced HIV infection. In large, randomised, double-blind, clinical trials, dual therapy with didanosine plus zidovudine was significantly more effective than zidovudine monotherapy in preventing disease progression and prolonging survival in previously untreated or antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients with intermediate or advanced HIV infection. Pancreatitis and peripheral neuropathy are serious adverse effects of didanosine. These effects are dose-related and usually reversible after discontinuation of treatment. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and/or abdominal pain have been reported in patients receiving treatment with the drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Didanosine is an effective and generally well tolerated drug in previously untreated and antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients with HIV infection. Given once or twice daily, it has an important role as a component of triple combination regimens for the treatment of patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic HIV infection.

Comparison of Once and Twice Daily Dosing of Didanosine in Combination with Stavudine for the Treatment of HIV-1 Infection

Objective

To compare the antiviral activity, safety and tolerability of didanosine dosed once and twice daily when administered in combination with stavudine dosed twice daily in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected individuals with little or no previous exposure to antiretroviral drugs.

Design

Comparative, multicentre, randomized, open-label, short-term study.

Patients and Methods

Eighty-four HIV-1-infected adults with qualifying baseline CD4 cell counts of 200 to 500 cells/mm3 were included in the study. Of these, 43 patients received once daily didanosine plus twice daily stavudine (group A) and 41 subjects received twice daily didanosine plus twice daily stavudine (group B). The primary efficacy analysis used was the time-averaged difference (TAD) between treatment regimens of variations in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels from baseline over the first 12 weeks of therapy. Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, CD4 cell counts and adverse events were monitored. Results: At week 12, median HIV-1 RNA variations were –1.18 log10 copies/ml in group A and –0.88 log10 copies/ml in group B. For patients who were followed up to week 24, median variations of HIV-1 RNA levels from baseline were –1.21 log10 copies/ml in group A and –0.78 log10 copies/ml in group B. The TAD between the two treatment groups for variations from baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA levels over the first 12 weeks was 0.10 log10 copies/ml (95% confidence interval, –0.19 to 0.40), indicating equivalence.

Conclusion

Once daily didanosine plus twice daily stavudine and twice daily didanosine plus twice daily stavudine are equally effective in reducing plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and increasing CD4 cell counts. Both regimens are safe and well tolerated.