Is indinavir crystalluria an indicator for indinavir stone formation?

Management of urinary stones: state of the art and future perspectives by experts in stone disease

AIM

To present state of the art on the management of urinary stones from a panel of globally recognized urolithiasis experts who met during the Experts in Stone Disease Congress in Valencia in January 2024. Options of treatment: The surgical treatment modalities of renal and ureteral stones are well defined by the guidelines of international societies, although for some index cases more alternative options are possible. For 1.5 cm renal stones, both m-PCNL and RIRS have proven to be valid treatment alternatives with comparable stone-free rates. The m-PCNL has proven to be more cost effective and requires a shorter operative time, while the RIRS has demonstrated lower morbidity in terms of blood loss and shorter recovery times. SWL has proven to be less effective at least for lower calyceal stones but has the highest safety profile. For a 6mm obstructing stone of the pelviureteric junction (PUJ) stone, SWL should be the first choice for a stone less than 1 cm, due to less invasiveness and lower risk of complications although it has a lower stone free-rate. RIRS has advantages in certain conditions such as anticoagulant treatment, obesity, or body deformity. Technical issues of the surgical procedures for stone removal: In patients receiving antithrombotic therapy, SWL, PCN and open surgery are at elevated risk of hemorrhage or perinephric hematoma. URS, is associated with less morbidity in these cases. An individualized combined evaluation of risks of bleeding and thromboembolism should determine the perioperative thromboprophylactic strategy. Pre-interventional urine culture and antibiotic therapy are mandatory although UTI treatment is becoming more challenging due to increasing resistance to routinely applied antibiotics. The use of an intrarenal urine culture and stone culture is recommended to adapt antibiotic therapy in case of postoperative infectious complications. Measurements of temperature and pressure during RIRS are vital for ensuring patient safety and optimizing surgical outcomes although techniques of measurements and methods for data analysis are still to be refined. Ureteral stents were improved by the development of new biomaterials, new coatings, and new stent designs. Topics of current research are the development of drug eluting and bioresorbable stents. Complications of endoscopic treatment: PCNL is considered the most invasive surgical option. Fever and sepsis were observed in 11 and 0.5% and need for transfusion and embolization for bleeding in 7 and 0.4%. Major complications, as colonic, splenic, liver, gall bladder and bowel injuries are quite rare but are associated with significant morbidity. Ureteroscopy causes less complications, although some of them can be severe. They depend on high pressure in the urinary tract (sepsis or renal bleeding) or application of excessive force to the urinary tract (ureteral avulsion or stricture). Diagnostic work up:  Genetic testing consents the diagnosis of monogenetic conditions causing stones. It should be carried out in children and in selected adults. In adults, monogenetic diseases can be diagnosed by systematic genetic testing in no more than 4%, when cystinuria, APRT deficiency, and xanthinuria are excluded. A reliable stone analysis by infrared spectroscopy or X-ray diffraction is mandatory and should be associated to examination of the stone under a stereomicroscope. The analysis of digital images of stones by deep convolutional neural networks in dry laboratory or during endoscopic examination could allow the classification of stones based on their color and texture. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in association with energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) is another fundamental research tool for the study of kidney stones. The combination of metagenomic analysis using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) techniques and the enhanced quantitative urine culture (EQUC) protocol can be used to evaluate the urobiome of renal stone formers. Twenty-four hour urine analysis has a place during patient evaluation together with repeated measurements of urinary pH with a digital pH meter. Urinary supersaturation is the most comprehensive physicochemical risk factor employed in urolithiasis research. Urinary macromolecules can act as both promoters or inhibitors of stone formation depending on the chemical composition of urine in which they are operating. At the moment, there are no clinical applications of macromolecules in stone management or prophylaxis. Patients should be evaluated for the association with systemic pathologies.

PROPHYLAXIS

Personalized medicine and public health interventions are complementary to prevent stone recurrence. Personalized medicine addresses a small part of stone patients with a high risk of recurrence and systemic complications requiring specific dietary and pharmacological treatment to prevent stone recurrence and complications of associated systemic diseases. The more numerous subjects who form one or a few stones during their entire lifespan should be treated by modifications of diet and lifestyle. Primary prevention by public health interventions is advisable to reduce prevalence of stones in the general population. Renal stone formers at "high-risk" for recurrence need early diagnosis to start specific treatment. Stone analysis allows the identification of most "high-risk" patients forming non-calcium stones: infection stones (struvite), uric acid and urates, cystine and other rare stones (dihydroxyadenine, xanthine). Patients at "high-risk" forming calcium stones require a more difficult diagnosis by clinical and laboratory evaluation. Particularly, patients with cystinuria and primary hyperoxaluria should be actively searched.

FUTURE RESEARCH

Application of Artificial Intelligence are promising for automated identification of ureteral stones on CT imaging, prediction of stone composition and 24-hour urinary risk factors by demographics and clinical parameters, assessment of stone composition by evaluation of endoscopic images and prediction of outcomes of stone treatments. The synergy between urologists, nephrologists, and scientists in basic kidney stone research will enhance the depth and breadth of investigations, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of kidney stone formation.

Urological management of indinavir-associated acute renal failure in HIV-positive patients

INTRODUCTION

Indinavir, a protease inhibitor that is commonly used to treat HIV infection, may cause crystal formation within the renal tubules when urine pH is above 3.5. Crystallization in the urine may lead to intrarenal crystal deposition and acute renal failure (ARF).

AIM

To establish the beneficial urological management of acute renal failure caused by indinavir treatment of HIV/AIDS patients.

PATIENTS--METHODS

Five HIV positive patients (four men, one woman) with a mean age of 32 years (range 28-36 years) were referred to our Department of Urology from an AIDS outpatient Clinic, because of the development of postrenal acute renal failure with continuously elevated creatinine and urea plasma levels after indinavir therapy. Among the initial therapeutic maneuvers, indinavir administration was interrupted for 1 week while bilateral double-J ureteral stents were inserted in all the HIV/AIDS patients, during the first 24-72 h to secure upper-tract drainage. Concurrently urine has been acidified by oral administration of the amino acid L: -methionine and oral fluid intake was increased.

RESULTS

All the patients responded well to the treatment and their renal function was effortlessly restored to normal within a few days.

CONCLUSION

HIV-positive patients receiving indinavir therapy might be complicated by acute renal failure, mainly due to intrarenal crystal deposition (tubules) or urolithiasis (postrenal obstruction). This adverse effect may simply manage by the discontinuation of indinavir administration, urine acidification, as well as the possible early insertion of bilateral double-J ureteral stents.

[Indinavir urolithiasis in HIV-positive patients. Treatment and prophylaxis]

TARGET

The approximate incidence of indinavir urolithiasis in HIV positive patients receiving the drug is 10%. The exact mechanism of lithogenesis is still unknown. Pure indinavir stones are radiolucent on plane abdominal X-ray or CT scan. Indinavir urolithiasis can be associated with acute unilateral renal colic or severe azotaemia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

20 HIV patients were treated conservatively by increasing oral fluid intake (urine production of 2 l/day and more), discontinuation of indinavir therapy for 1 week and acidification of urine with l-methionin (urine pH 5,3-5,8). Some patients were additionally treated with endoscopic procedures.

RESULTS

In all patients renal function normalized. Increase of oral fluid intake, especially during the first 2 hours after intake of indinavir and during night prevented recurrence of indinavir urolithiasis.

CONCLUSION

HIV positive patients with renal colic or renal insufficiency and roentgenological absence of radio-opaque stone formations should make the urologist consider indinavir urolithiasis as a possible diagnosis.

Treatment of indinavir sulfate induced urolithiasis in HIV-positive patients

Indinavir sulfate is a protease inhibitor used of the treatment of primary HIV infection either as monotherapy or as part of antiretroviral treatment schemes. Approximately 10% of all patients develop urolithiasis with radiolucent stones consisting of indinavir. We present our results of the treatment in 11 HIV positive patients (9 men, 2 women), who developed Indinavir lithiasis after 5-8 months of antiretroviral therapy. Following the initial procedures (spasmoanalgetic drugs, ureteroscopy, double J-stent or nephrostomy), the patients were further treated by increasing diuresis and urinary acidification. All the patients responded well to the treatment, the obstruction was releieved and their renal function was restored to normal.

Persistent leukocyturia and loss of renal function in a prospectively monitored cohort of HIV-infected patients treated with indinavir

Symptomatic nephrotoxicity is a well-known complication of indinavir treatment. However, little is known about the relevance of other abnormalities, such as leukocyturia during use of indinavir. We determined the prevalence, risk factors, and consequences of persistent leukocyturia in a prospectively monitored cohort of indinavir users in three adult outpatient clinics. Patients were monitored for nephrotoxicity at regular visits (every 3 months) between August 1998 and September 2000. Monitoring involved urine dipstick analysis and microscopy for pH, erythrocytes, leukocytes, and indinavir crystals. The urine albumin concentration/creatinine concentration ratio and serum creatinine and indinavir plasma concentrations were measured, and urinary tract infection was excluded. Urologic symptoms were retrieved from medical records. Of 184 patients with at least one assessment, 35% had leukocyturia (i.e., >75 cells/microL) at least once during the study period, which coincided with mild increase in the serum albumin level, erythrocyturia, and crystalluria. Thirty-two (24%) of 134 patients with two or more assessments had persistent leukocyturia (i.e., on two or more occasions). Risk factors were indinavir plasma concentration of >9 mg/L, urine pH of >5.7, and crystalluria. Persistent leukocyturia was associated with a gradual loss of renal function but not with urologic symptoms. The data show that leukocyturia is a frequent finding and emphasize the need for monitoring renal function during indinavir treatment, even in the absence of urologic symptoms.

Persistent sterile leukocyturia is associated with impaired renal function in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children treated with indinavir

BACKGROUND

Prolonged administration of indinavir is associated with the occurrence of a variety of renal complications in adults. These well-documented side effects have restricted the use of this potent protease inhibitor in children.

DESIGN

A prospective study to monitor indinavir-related nephrotoxicity in a cohort of 30 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children treated with indinavir.

METHODS

Urinary pH, albumin, creatinine, the presence of erythrocytes, leukocytes, bacteria and crystals, and culture were analyzed every 3 months for 96 weeks. Serum creatinine levels were routinely determined at the same time points. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of indinavir were done at week 4 after the initiation of indinavir.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of persistent sterile leukocyturia (> or =75 cells/ micro L in at least 2 consecutive visits) after 96 weeks was 53%. Persistent sterile leukocyturia was frequently associated with a mild increase in the urine albumin/creatinine ratio and by microscopic hematuria. The cumulative incidence of serum creatinine levels >50% above normal was 33% after 96 weeks. Children with persistent sterile leukocyturia more frequently had serum creatinine levels of 50% above normal than those children without persistent sterile leukocyturia. In children younger than 5.6 years, persistent sterile leukocyturia was significantly more frequent than in older children. A higher cumulative incidence of persistent leukocyturia was found in children with an area under the curve >19 mg/L x h or a peak serum level of indinavir >12 mg/L. In 4 children, indinavir was discontinued because of nephrotoxicity. Subsequently, the serum creatinine levels decreased, the urine albumin/creatinine ratios returned to zero, and the leukocyturia disappeared within 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Children treated with indinavir have a high cumulative incidence of persistent sterile leukocyturia. Children with persistent sterile leukocyturia more frequently had an increase in serum creatinine levels of >50% above normal. Younger children have an additional risk for renal complications. The impairment of the renal function in these children occurred in the absence of clinical symptoms of nephrolithiasis. Indinavir-associated nephrotoxicity must be monitored closely, especially in children with risk factors such as persistent sterile leukocyturia, age <5.6 years, an area under the curve of indinavir >19 mg/L x h, and a C(max) >12 mg/L.