Prescribing practices in a population-based HIV postexposure prophylaxis program

Predictors of the initiation of HIV postexposure prophylaxis in Rhode Island emergency departments

The objective of this study was to elucidate factors that predicted the initiation of HIV postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) for blood or body fluid exposures evaluated at Rhode Island emergency departments (EDs). The study involved a retrospective review of patient visits to all civilian Rhode Island EDs for these exposures from 1995 to mid-2001. Multivariate logistic regression models were created to evaluate predictors of the offering and the acceptance and receipt of HIV PEP from 1996 to 2001. The search identified 3622 patients who sustained a blood or body fluid exposure. Of these, 43.8% were health care workers (HCWs) and 57.2% were not HCWs. Most (52.0%) of the exposures were nonsexual. HIV PEP was offered to 21.0% and accepted and received by 9.4% of all patients. HIV PEP was offered more often after significant exposures, exposures to known HIV-infected sources, when time elapsed after the exposure was shorter, if the patients were HCWs, adults, presented to a teaching hospital, presented during the latter years of the study, or sustained nonsexual exposures. Once offered HIV PEP, patients who were male, adult, sustained a significant exposure, knew the source was HIV infected, sustained a nonsexual exposure, or were HCWs had a greater odds of accepting and receiving HIV PEP. Even when controlling for exposure significance, HIV status, and time elapsed since the exposure, several factors such as gender and type of hospital that are unrelated to the exposure appeared to influence the initiation of HIV PEP. ED providers should ensure that these factors do not inappropriately restrict its initiation.

Postexposure prophylaxis after sexual exposure to HIV

Increasing numbers of international, national and state/provincial health organizations in the developed and developing world recommend postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) following potential sexual exposure to HIV. The evidence for these policies is extrapolated from occupational healthcare worker, perinatal prophylaxis and animal studies. There is no direct evidence of PEP efficacy after sexual exposures. Studies addressing potential increases in risk behavior, toxicities and cost–effectiveness are encouraging. Considerations for offering PEP include the timing and characteristics of the exposure and the HIV status of the source and exposed individuals. PEP includes 28 days of a combination antiretroviral drug regimen containing two or more drugs and associated laboratory testing, counseling and referrals. PEP service delivery challenges include ensuring adequate access to services, optimizing PEP adherence and facilitating follow-up HIV testing and counseling. Men who have sex with men, sexual assault survivors, children and adolescents, and individuals in resource-limited settings present unique needs and challenges.

Postexposure prophylaxis after sexual exposure to HIV

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

HIV postexposure prophylaxis is often recommended following potential sexual exposure to HIV. Recent data address the effectiveness of postexposure prophylaxis and prevention counseling, cost-effectiveness, antiretroviral options, challenges with nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis among adolescents and children and following sexual assault in high HIV prevalence areas, and a successful program in Amsterdam.

RECENT FINDINGS

Postexposure prophylaxis is not completely protective. Seroconversion may result from antiretroviral failure or from ongoing exposures. Postexposure prophylaxis associated risk reduction counseling results in reductions in subsequent risk behavior. Programs that target outreach and limit prescriptions to those with exposure sources who are at risk of being HIV infected are cost-effective. Less restrictive guidelines result in more prescriptions for low-risk exposures; this practice is not cost-effective. The ideal antiretrovirals for postexposure prophylaxis use have not been established. Tenofovir has several attractive properties. Developing systems to support the effective delivery of postexposure prophylaxis among children and adolescents and following sexual assault in high HIV prevalence, resource limited settings is challenging.

SUMMARY

Numerous national and international guidelines recommend postexposure prophylaxis following potential sexual exposure to HIV. Maximizing adherence and minimizing subsequent HIV exposures will be critical to enhancing the effectiveness of this HIV prevention intervention.