Update on chronic hepatitis C in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients: viral interactions and therapy

Role of a clinical pharmacist as part of a multidisciplinary care team in the treatment of HCV in patients living with HIV/HCV coinfection

Background

The objective of the study was to evaluate the role of a clinical pharmacist in hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment of patients living with HIV/HCV coinfection.

Methods

We conducted a descriptive study to quantify the functions of a clinical pharmacist in HCV treatment of patients living with HIV/HCV coinfection who were initiating HCV treatment at a publicly funded clinic between March 18, 2015 and September 15, 2016. The clinical pharmacist’s role was categorized into eight categories: 1) HCV prior authorization (PA) completion; 2) HCV medication adherence counseling; 3) HCV drug-drug interaction (DDI) counseling and screening; 4) HCV medication counseling regarding common adverse events (AEs); 5) HCV counseling regarding HCV treatment outcomes and risk of reinfection; 6) ordering laboratory tests and interpretation of HCV laboratory values; 7) HIV medication AE assessment; and 8) other (including refilling medications and management of other comorbidities).

Results

One hundred and thirty-five patients initiated treatment during this timeframe: 77.0% were males, 56.3% non-cirrhotic, 77.0% HCV treatment-naïve, 45.9% HCV genotype 1a, and 83.0% initiated on ledipasvir/sofosbuvir. The clinical pharmacist completed 150 PAs, counseled on HCV medication adherence in 79.2% of patients, conducted HCV DDI counseling and screening in 54.2%, and monitored HCV medication AEs in 54.2%. The clinical pharmacist counseled patients on HCV treatment outcomes and risk of reinfection in 53.1%, ordered laboratory tests in 44.8%, and reported and interpreted laboratory values in 44.8%. The clinical pharmacist assessed HIV medication AEs in 54.2% of patients and participated in other activities in 42.7%.

Conclusion

A clinical pharmacist’s expertise as part of a multidisciplinary care team facilitates optimal treatment outcomes and provides critical support in the management of DAA therapy in individuals living with HIV/HCV coinfection.

The HCV care continuum among people who use drugs: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis, management, and treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (the "HCV care continuum") have improved in recent years. People who use drugs (PWUD) have a prevalence of HCV infection from 30 to 70 %, yet rates of testing, engagement in care, and treatment for HCV are disproportionately low compared to other populations. Delineating the progression of PWUD through the steps in the HCV care continuum in the USA is important in informing efforts to improve HCV outcomes among PWUD.

METHODS/DESIGN

Scientific databases will be searched using a comprehensive automated search strategy; gray literature and reference lists will be manually searched. Eligible reports will provide original research data related to the HCV care continuum in the USA including proportions of PWUD engaging in the following discrete steps: screening/testing, engagement in care (including receiving an HCV clinical assessment), treatment initiation and completion, and rates of those with successful HCV treatment. A quality-rating tool will be developed to ascertain the level of bias (including selection bias) in each report, and a quality score will be assigned to each eligible report. A tool adapted from the Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 instrument will be developed to assess the extent to which an included report reflects an effectiveness or efficacy study design. Pooled estimates and measures of association will be calculated using random effects models, and heterogeneity will be assessed at each stage of data synthesis.

DISCUSSION

Through this review, we hope to quantify the proportion of PWUD at each progressive step and to help identify key individual, social, and structural points of leakage in the HCV care continuum for PWUD. In meeting these objectives, we will identify predictors to progress along the HCV care continuum, which can be used to inform policy to directly improve HCV care for PWUD.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42016034113.

New Hopes for HIV and HCV Coinfection in 2004

An increase in liver-related causes of death in HIV-positive patients who are coinfected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been acknowledged over the last few years, particularly since the mid 1990s, when the natural history of HIV infection started to improve with the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Chronic hepatitis C is very common among HIV-infected patients who were infected through intravenous drugs use or contaminated blood products (e.g., hemophiliacs). The bidirectional interferences between HIV and HCV modify the natural history of both infections. Moreover, interactions between anti-HIV and anti-HCV drugs are of concern, and a lower response to anti-HCV therapy limits its benefit in HIV-coinfected patients. Although a slower HCV RNA decay is seen in coinfected patients after standard therapy is initiated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin, the stopping rule at week 12 that is recommended for HCV-monoinfected individuals seems to be equally valid in HIV-positive patients. This finding is of great value, because it allows treatment to be offered in the absence of contraindication (e.g., low CD4 count, alcohol abuse, etc.) but discontinued as early as 12 weeks when no chances of cure are predicted, which saves costs and deleterious side effects. HAART therapy seems to temper somehow the negative impact exerted by HIV infection over HCV-related liver fibrosis. Liver transplantation is currently the best option for HIV-infected patients with end-stage liver disease. However, the management of patients on the waiting list and after transplantation carries significant new challenges. New anti-HCV drugs are urgently needed and new strategies with the currently available drugs need to be assessed to reduce the negative impact of hepatitis C in HIV-coinfected individuals.

Evaluation and treatment of hepatitis C in patients with human immunodeficiency virus

OBJECTIVES

The rate of treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus (HIV-HCV) co-infected patients remains historically low. We undertook a retrospective study to review our treatment rate and factors that have negatively influenced this rate. In those treated, we reviewed outcomes and compared results with prior studies.

METHODS

A total of 233 patients infected with HIV and HCV were followed for 7 years in the infectious diseases (ID) clinic of East Carolina University. Proper follow-up evaluation was determined based on the presence of HCV polymerase chain reaction viral load and genotype testing. The number of patients treated, response to treatment, and reason for no treatment were determined by chart review.

RESULTS

Of 233 patients with positive HCV serology, 48 were excluded due to undetectable HCV viral load. Of the remaining 185 patients, 142 (77%) were evaluated by testing for HCV viral load and genotype, but only 112 of those who were followed up in the clinic regularly were considered eligible for therapy. Fourteen of 112 (12.5%) of patients underwent treatment and only 1 in 14 (7%) attained sustained virological response (SVR). Of the patients tested, 96% had HCV genotype 1, and 81% were African American.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of our HIV-HCV co-infected patients received a proper HCV evaluation, but only 12.5% were offered therapy. Of those treated, only one patient achieved SVR. The higher proportion of genotype 1 and African American patient population are considered the main reasons for the low SVR. Low SVR rate, high rate of adverse effects, and the unique demography of our patient population have been the main reasons for the lower treatment rate.

Impact of HAART exposure and associated lipodystrophy on advanced liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients

The impact of antiretroviral drug exposure and associated lipodystrophy and/or insulin resistance (IR) on advanced liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients is not fully documented. We determined the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis (defined by hepatic stiffness ≥9.5 kPa) and associated factors, focusing on the impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy and its major adverse effects (lipodystrophy and IR), in 671 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients included in the ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH cohort. One hundred ninety patients (28.3%) had advanced liver fibrosis. In univariate analysis, advanced liver fibrosis was significantly associated with male sex, higher body mass index, HCV infection through intravenous drug use, a lower absolute CD4 cell count, a longer history of antiretroviral treatment, longer durations of protease inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and NRTI exposure, lipodystrophy, diabetes, and a high homeostasis model assessment method (HOMA) value. The only antiretroviral drugs associated with advanced liver fibrosis were efavirenz, stavudine and didanosine. In multivariate analysis, male sex (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.5; P = 0.018), HCV infection through intravenous drug use (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.6; P = 0.018), lipodystrophy (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.3; P = 0.01), median didanosine exposure longer than 5 months (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.8; P = 0.04) and a high HOMA value (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2; P = 0.005) remained significantly associated with advanced liver fibrosis. Mitochondrial toxicity and IR thus appear to play a key role in liver damage associated with HIV/HCV-coinfection, and this should be taken into account when selecting and optimizing antiretroviral therapy. Antiretroviral drugs with strong mitochondrial toxicity (e.g. didanosine) or a major effect on glucose metabolism should be avoided.

Effect of treating co-infections on HIV-1 viral load: a systematic review

Co-infections contribute to HIV-related pathogenesis and often increase viral load in HIV-infected people. We did a systematic review to assess the effect of treating key co-infections on plasma HIV-1-RNA concentrations in low-income countries. We identified 18 eligible studies for review: two on tuberculosis, two on malaria, six on helminths, and eight on sexually transmitted infections, excluding untreatable or non-pathogenic infections. Standardised mean plasma viral load decreased after the treatment of co-infecting pathogens in all 18 studies. The standardised mean HIV viral-load difference ranged from -0.04 log(10) copies per mL (95% CI -0.24 to 0.16) after syphilis treatment to -3.47 log(10) copies per mL (95% CI -3.78 to -3.16) after tuberculosis treatment. Of 14 studies with variance data available, 12 reported significant HIV viral-load differences before and after treatment. Although many of the viral-load reductions were 1.0 log(10) copies per mL or less, even small changes in plasma HIV-RNA concentrations have been shown to slow HIV progression and could translate into population-level benefits in lowering HIV transmission risk.

Histological response to pegIFNalpha-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin in HIV-hepatitis C virus co-infection

OBJECTIVE

Paired liver biopsies from patients enrolled in the multinational AIDS PEGASYS Ribavirin International Co-infection Trial were analysed to investigate a possible correlation between virological and histological responses.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 860 HIV-hepatitis C virus (HCV)-co-infected patients were randomly assigned to receive pegIFNalpha-2a (40KD) 180 microg/week plus 800 mg daily ribavirin, pegIFNalpha-2a (40KD) plus placebo or conventional IFNalpha-2a 3 MIU three times a week plus ribavirin for 48 weeks. Paired biopsies were obtained from 401 patients and scored locally using the Ishak-modified histological activity index (HAI). The second biopsy was obtained, on average, 26 weeks or more after the end of treatment. Histological response was defined as a 2-point or greater reduction in the HAI score.

RESULTS

The histological response rate was significantly higher in patients receiving pegIFNalpha-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin (57%) than in patients receiving pegIFNalpha-2a (40KD) plus placebo (39%; P < 0.017) or IFNalpha-2a plus ribavirin (41%; P = 0.04). Histological response was correlated with virological response, with the histological response rate ranging from 62 to 74% in patients who achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). Histological response was also seen in 32-43% of patients not achieving an SVR. A higher total HAI score was the only prognostic factor for achieving histological response.

CONCLUSION

The histological response rate was significantly higher in HIV-HCV-co-infected patients who received pegIFNalpha-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin than in those receiving pegIFNalpha-2a (40KD) plus placebo or IFNalpha-2a plus ribavirin. Histological response was correlated with virological response, although a substantial proportion of patients who did not achieve an SVR experienced histological improvement.

[HIV-associated tumors]

In the beginning of the HIV epidemic, Kaposi sarcoma was a common stigma in AIDS patients and one of the leading causes of death. While Kaposi sarcoma is seen less frequently since the introduction of antiretroviral therapy, lymphoma and other malignancies are an increasing therapeutic challenge. The incidence of HPV-related anal carcinoma and its precursor lesions is rising so dramatically that screening programs as they are already established for cervical carcinoma should be implemented. The role of HPV in UV-associated tumors is not yet determined. Additional risk factors like smoking and HCV co-infection seem to play important roles in the high incidence of lung and hepatocellular carcinomas. While fewer patients die from opportunistic infections, we face a growing problem with malignancies in HIV-positive patients.

Hepatitis C virus genotype and HIV coinfection affect cytokine mRNA levels in unstimulated PBMC but do not shift the T1/T2 balance

Rapid progression of hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease in patients with HIV/HCV may reflect different cytokine responses and be influenced by HCV genotype. This is addressed by a study of patients with HIV/HCV coinfection and infection with HCV genotype 2 or 3 (2/3). They are compared with coinfected patients infected with genotype 1 and HCV monoinfected patients matched for HCV genotype. IFN-gamma, IL-10, IL-4 and IL-4delta2 mRNA were quantified by real-time PCR in unstimulated PBMC and after in vitro stimulation with HCV core or nonstructural 3/4A antigen. In unstimulated PBMC, levels of IFN-gamma and IL-4 mRNA were lowest in HIV/HCV genotype 1 patients, intermediate in HIV/HCV genotype 2/3 patients and highest in HCV genotype 2/3 patients. Neither HCV genotype nor HIV affected levels of IL-10 mRNA in unstimulated PBMC or IFN-gamma, IL-4 and IL-10 mRNA in PBMC stimulated with HCV antigens. Levels of IL-4 and IL-4delta2 mRNA correlated in mitogen-stimulated PBMC from all patient groups but both were low in HIV/HCV genotype 1 patients. Serum soluble CD30 levels (a putative marker of a T2 cytokine environment) did not differ between patient groups. The data do not suggest a shift in the T1/T2 balance driven by HIV coinfection or HCV genotype but either may affect IL-4 bioavailability.

National multicenter study of HIV testing and HIV seropositivity in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND

Although HIV testing is recommended for persons with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who are at risk for HIV, little is known about HIV testing in this population.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected in 4364 HCV-infected patients at 24 Veterans Affairs medical centers across the United States, including demographics, risk factors for HIV infection, and self-reported information on HIV testing.

RESULTS

Overall, 76.8% had been tested for HIV at least once, 14.8% were never tested, 6.6% did not know if they were tested, and 1.8% declined to answer. Multivariable analysis identified injection drug use, needlestick injury, sex with a same-sex partner, a greater number of lifetime sexual partners, and sex with an injection drug user as factors that were independently associated with HIV testing. At least one risk factor for HIV infection was present in 84.5% of the 646 patients who were never HIV tested. Among the 3350 subjects who were tested for HIV, 8.4% were positive, 88.3% were negative, 2.4% did not know the results of their test, and 0.9% declined to answer. Multivariable analysis identified African American and Hispanic race/ethnicity, income < or = 10,000 dollars, sex with a same-sex partner, and sex with an injection drug user as the only variables that were independently associated with HIV seropositivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a substantial proportion of HCV-infected patients have been tested for HIV, missed opportunities for early diagnosis of HIV infection exist. Public health strategies to improve HIV testing among patients with chronic HCV infection are needed.

[HIV and HCV coinfection]

Chronic hepatitis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is now one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among HIV-infected individuals. Coinfected patients present an accelerated course toward cirrhosis and an enhanced risk of liver toxicity associated with the use of antiretroviral agents. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV1 patients is less efficacious than in HCV-monoinfected individuals and requires particular expertise.

HIV-related liver disease: infections versus drugs

HIV-infected individuals have myriad causes of hepatotoxicity that range from mild hepatitis to significant liver failure with its associated morbidity and mortality, especially in the setting of chronic viral hepatitis (HCV and HBV). Immune restoration by HAART therapy can contribute liver-related toxicity in HIV-coinfected patients. Clinicians need to be aware of this problem and individualize management in this challenging clinical scenario. Avoidance of potentially hepatotoxic agents or close monitoring during treatment of HIV may prevent liver failure in patients who have HIV. Furthermore, vaccination against hepatitis A virus and HBV in nonimmune HIV individuals may prevent acquisition of hepatitis A virus and HBV infections in patients who have HIV. Finally, treatment of HIV, and, if appropriate, treatment of those who are coinfected with HCV and HBV with close monitoring, may improve the outcome of patients who have HIV and are at risk fo r significant hepatotoxicity during treatment from immune restoration or hypersensitivity reactions.

Antiviral hepatitis and antiretroviral drug interactions

More and more HIV-infected patients are treated for viral hepatitis, increasing interactions. HEPATITIS C: The concomitant use of didanosine and ribavirin increases the risk of mitochondrial toxicity, responsible for pancreatitis and/or lactic acidosis. Lactic acidosis is characterized by a high mortality rate. Thus, didanosine, but also stavudine, should not be co-administered with ribavirin. Cases of hepatic decompensation have been reported in cirrhotics concomitantly receiving ribavirin and didanosine. Thus, this co-admininistration should be contraindicated in patients with advanced liver fibrosis. Anemia is a frequent side effect of ribavirin. In patients with zidovudine-related anemia, this drug should be discontinued before prescribing ribavirin. Erythropoietin may help to improve the haemoglobin level. HEPATITIS B: Adefovir significantly decreases the plasma levels of saquinavir. Pancreatitis may occur with the co-administration of didanosine and tenofovir. Thus this co-administration should be avoided. Atazanavir concentrations are decreased when tenofovir is co-administered. Thus, atazanavir should be boosted with ritonavir, when combined with tenofovir. Atazanavir increases the concentrations of tenofovir, with the potential risk of increasing the adverse events of tenofovir, including renal disorders. Tenofovir area under the curve is increased if lopinavir-ritonavir are co-administered. The main interactions, with a fatal risk, are observed with didanosine, when co-administered with ribavirin (hepatitis C) or with tenofovir (hepatitis B). Anemia is frequent, but usually moderate, when zidovudine is co-administered with ribavirin. Other interactions are usually easy to manage.

Management of chronic hepatitis B and C in HIV-coinfected patients

One-third of HIV-infected individuals worldwide suffer from chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but chronic hepatitis C affects more than 75% of HIV-positive subjects infected parenterally, such as haemophiliacs and intravenous drug users. Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, on the other hand, occurs in 10% of HIV-infected persons, coinfection being more prevalent in Southeast Asia. There are two main reasons for considering HCV and HBV therapy as a priority in HIV-coinfected patients: first, the more rapid liver disease progression seen in this population, leading to end-stage liver disease complications, including hepatocellular carcinoma, at younger ages; and second, the higher risk of developing hepatotoxicity following the initiation of antiretroviral therapy in subjects with underlying chronic hepatitis than in HIV-monoinfected individuals. As highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has dramatically improved the prognosis of those with HIV disease, the consequences of associated illnesses such as hepatitis B and C, which are currently among the leading causes of hospital admission and death in the HIV-infected population, have become more relevant. Therefore, the adequate management of viral hepatitis should now be considered a priority in HIV-coinfected patients. Several guidelines have recently been released in response to this demand. In this article, we discuss the most critical issues highlighted in these documents.

Effect of ribavirin on intracellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus coinfection: results of a randomized clinical study

The intracellular triphosphorylation and plasma pharmacokinetics of lamivudine (3TC), stavudine (d4T), and zidovudine (ZDV) were assessed in a pharmacokinetic substudy, in 56 human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus (HIV-HCV) coinfected patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) 180 microg/week plus either placebo or ribavirin (RBV) 800 mg/day in the AIDS PEGASYS Ribavirin International Coinfection Trial. There were no significant differences between patients treated with RBV and placebo in plasma pharmacokinetics parameters for the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) at steady state (weeks 8 to 12): ratios of least squares mean of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-12 h)) were 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.51) for 3TC, 1.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 3.60) for d4T and 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 1.45) for ZDV, and ratios of least squares mean plasma C(max) were 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.78), 1.06 (95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.65), and 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 1.53), respectively. Concentrations of NRTI triphosphate (TP) metabolites in relation to those of the triphosphates of endogenous deoxythymidine-triphosphate (dTTP) and deoxcytidine-triphosphate (dCTP) were similar in the RBV and placebo groups. Differences (RBV to placebo) in least squares mean ratios of AUC(0-12 h) at steady state were 0.274 (95% confidence interval, -0.37 to 0.91) for 3TC-TP:dCTP, 0.009 (95% confidence interval, -0.06 to 0.08) for d4T-TP:dTTP, and -0.081 (95% confidence interval, -0.40 to 0.24) for ZDV-TP:dTTP. RBV did not adversely affect HIV-1 replication. In summary, RBV 800 mg/day administered in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) does not significantly affect the intracellular phosphorylation or plasma pharmacokinetics of 3TC, d4T, and ZDV in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients.

New paradigms in the management of HIV and hepatitis C virus coinfection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic hepatitis C virus infection is currently one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected individuals, mainly in hemophiliacs and intravenous drug users. The bidirectional interferences between hepatitis C virus and HIV have clinical consequences and complicate the management of coinfected individuals.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is an increased rate of liver complications among coinfected patients due to the decrease in opportunistic infections resulting from the use of potent antiretroviral therapy and accelerated progression to liver cirrhosis in the HIV setting. Conversely, the risk of hepatotoxicity of antiretrovirals is higher in the presence of chronic hepatitis C. While the standard therapy for hepatitis C in HIV is the combination of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin, overall treatment responses are lower in HIV-coinfected than in hepatitis C virus-monoinfected patients. Moreover, interactions between ribavirin and HIV drugs (i.e. didanosine, zidovudine) are associated with higher risks of side effects.

SUMMARY

Given the accelerated progression to end-stage liver disease in coinfected patients, treatment of hepatitis C should be a priority. While hepatitis C therapy should not be denied in the absence of contraindication, it should be re-assessed at week 12 and therapy continued only in patients showing more than 2 log drops in viremia, to avoid side effects. Most recent data suggest that adequate selection of candidates, expert management of side effects, and prescription of appropriate ribavirin doses (in genotypes 1-4) and extending treatment (in genotypes 2-3) all might allow response rates in coinfected patients to approach those seen in hepatitis C virus-monoinfected individuals.

Infection-related vasculitis

Infection-related vasculitis constitutes the most common cause of secondary vasculitis. A great variety of microorganisms can induce directly or indirectly inflammatory vascular damage resulting in vascular occlusion, tissue ischemia, and necrosis. In the developed world hepatitis B and C-related vasculitis remain the most common clinical syndromes, while HIV-associated vasculitis remains a concern in developing countries.

Pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) is classified into six genotypes. Genotype 4 is now spreading in Europe, especially among drug users, who are often infected with both HCV and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Previous studies have shown that HCV-4 responds poorly to interferon. Pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) associated with ribavirin is now the most effective treatment for eradicating the virus. We have now studied the response of HCV-4 to peg-IFN and ribavirin and investigated the influence of HIV infection on anti-HCV therapy. Twenty-eight patients infected with HCV-4 were given peg-IFN plus ribavirin for 48 weeks. Patients infected with HCV alone tended to have a better initial response (66%) than patients infected with both HCV and HIV (30%, P = 0.06) and eradication was better (50%) than in doubly infected patients (15%, P = 0.06). After controlling for major factors influencing virus response, the virus response 12 weeks after the beginning of treatment in patients infected with HCV-4 (50%) was similar to that of patients infected with genotype 1 (53%) and lower than that of patients infected with genotypes 2 or 3 (82%, P < 0.05). The response 24 weeks after the end of therapy in patients infected with HCV-4 (32%) was similar to that of patients infected with HCV-1 (28%) and lower than that of patients with HCV-2 or HCV-3 (62% P < 0.05). These results indicate that HCV-4 patients should be considered to be difficult-to-treat.

Update on viral hepatitis in 2004

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article highlights recent advances in viral hepatitis published from December 2003 to November 2004. Studies reporting novel and clinically relevant findings were selected after a PubMed search. The aim is to provide an up-to-date summary of important developments in viral hepatitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lamivudine was shown to reduce the rate of long-term complications of hepatitis B virus-induced cirrhosis. Adefovir was effective in suppressing lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus. Pegylated interferon alone was as effective as pegylated interferon plus lamivudine in the management of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. A 24-week course of pegylated interferon plus low-dose ribavirin was optimal in patients with hepatitis C virus infected with genotype 2 or 3, but a 48-week course and standard dose of ribavirin were needed in patients with genotype 1. Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin was fairly well tolerated in HIV-hepatitis C virus coinfected patients with stable HIV infection and resulted in response rates that were only slightly lower than that in patients with hepatitis C virus infection only. A dramatic reduction in hepatitis C virus RNA level was observed after 2 days of treatment with an hepatitis C virus protease inhibitor.

SUMMARY

The optimal management of chronic viral hepatitis is evolving rapidly. Newer treatment options for hepatitis B, including pegylated interferon, tenofovir, and combination regimens were shown to be effective in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients. In addition, impressive gains were made in the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in difficult-to-treat patients, including African Americans and those with HIV-hepatitis C virus coinfection.

Hepatitis C in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus. A review and experience of a Brazilian ambulatory

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) share the same transmission mechanisms. The prevalence of HCV in the HIV-infected population varies from region to region, throughout the world, depending on different exposure factors to both viruses. Co-infection with HIV accelerates the progression of the disease caused by HCV, appears to worsen the progression of the HIV infection and increases HCV transmission. Therefore, clinical management and treatment of HCV is a priority in medical facilities that receive HIV-infected patients. Clinical management of these patients involves specific diagnostic procedures and appropriately trained medical staff. The indication of treatment should meet specific clinical and laboratory criteria. There are a number of drugs currently available to treat hepatitis C in co-infected patients.

Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) plus ribavirin: a review of its use in hepatitis C Virus And HIV co-infection

Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is the standard first-line treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) mono-infection. Although the optimal anti-HCV regimen is not established in the more difficult-to-treat population with HIV-HCV co-infection, much of the data in this clinical setting have been derived from studies evaluating peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) [Pegasys] plus ribavirin (Copegus), most notably the APRICOT (AIDS Pegasys Ribavirin International Co-Infection Trial) and the ACTG (AIDS Clinical Trial Group) A5071 study. In particular, results of APRICOT - the largest study conducted to date with a pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in patients with HIV-HCV co-infection - indicate that a substantial proportion of patients will achieve sustained virological response (SVR) at week 72 when these drugs are administered for 48 weeks in an appropriate dosage regimen. In general, the tolerability profile of peginterferon-alpha-2a plus ribavirin in APRICOT was similar to that previously reported in patients with HCV mono-infection.

Tolérance et interactions médicamenteuses des traitements anti-VIH et anti-VHC

Treating Hepatitis C among HIV patients under antiretroviral drug therapy requires a high degree of vigilance and continuous monitoring because of frequent problems with intolerance and/or drug interactions. Recent studies, including three therapeutic trials, on Ribavic, APRICOT, and ACTG A5671, have given some insights on following these patients up. The adverse effects are relatively similar in HCV-HIV-co-infected patients and patients infected by HCV only. Their frequency is, on the other hand, higher among HCV-HIV-Co-infected patients. The adverse-effects are consistent, in a non-exhaustive way, with pseudo influenza-like symptoms, fever, myalgia, cephalgia, with psychiatric disorders (irritability, depression, etc.); endocrine disorders (thyroid dysfunction, diabetes...); and with hematological anomalies especially anemia and leucopenia. But the percentage of lymphocyte T CD4 is not modified, therefore there is no risk of opportunistic infection. Pharmacokinetic interactions between antiretroviral drugs and treatment for HCV infection including ribavirin plus interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) or pegylated IFN are described. They are almost exclusively due to the combination of ribavirin and of nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors. One of the principal consequences is the emergence of mitochondrial toxicity defined by the occurrence of hyperlactatemia, or acute pancreatitis). Thus, some combinations should be avoided such as ddI+ribavirin and ddI+d4T+ribavirin. The d4T+ribavirin combination must also be used with caution.

Open, Randomized, Multicentre Italian Trial on Peg-Ifn plus Ribavirin versus Peg-Ifn Monotherapy for Chronic Hepatitis C in HIV-Coinfected Patients on Haart

Background

Chronic hepatitis C is common and aggressive in HIV-positive patients, so the development of a well-tolerated HCV therapy is a priority. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon α2b (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) versus PEG-IFN monotherapy in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients undergoing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), and analysed the predictive factors of response.

Methods

An Italian, multicentre, open-label trial including 135 coinfected patients, randomized to PEG-IFN 1.5 μg/kg/week plus RBV 400 mg twice daily ( n=69, arm A) or PEG-IFN 1.5 μg/kg/week ( n=66, arm B) for 48 weeks. We assessed the predictive values of early virological response (EVR) at week 8 (HCV-RNA drop >2 log10 compared with baseline or undetectable levels) on sustained virological response (SVR).

Results

Fifty-five patients (28 from arm A and 27 from arm B) completed 48 weeks of therapy. At the end of treatment, 20/28 patients in arm A and 11/27 in arm B had HCV-RNA <50 IU/ml. In a per-protocol analysis, SVR was reached by 54% of patients in arm A (genotype 2–3, 11/16; genotype 1–4, 4/12) and 22% in arm B (genotype 2–3, 3/15; genotype 1–4, 3/12). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the SVR was 22% in arm A (genotype 2–3, 11/32; genotype 1–4, 4/37) versus 9% in arm B (genotype 2–3, 3/32; genotype 1–4, 3/34). The best predictors of SVR were the use of combination therapy, infection with HCV genotype 3 versus genotype 1, and EVR at week 8. Thirty patients (15 from arm A and 15 from arm B) dropped out of the trial prematurely due to side effects. The positive predictive value of EVR at week 8 was 65%, the negative predictive value was 86%.

Conclusions

PEG-IFN plus RBV can be considered a solid option for the treatment of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. The key to successfully improving efficacy is strong compliance through strict overall patient monitoring, in order to best manage drug toxicity. EVR assessment at week 8 may become a useful stategy in the management of therapy.

Mitochondrial Effects of a 24-Week Course of Pegylated-Interferon plus Ribavirin in Asymptomatic HCV/HIV Co-Infected Patients on Long-Term Treatment with Didanosine, Stavudine or Both

Background

It has been suggested that the addition of ribavirin (RBV) as a part of the treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIV co-infected patients on didanosine (ddI) or stavudine (d4T) might increase the nucleoside-induced impairment of mitochondrial function. Design: Comparative study to investigate the impact on mitochondrial function of adding RBV to a long-term treatment with ddI, d4T or both in HCV/HIV non-cirrhotic, asymptomatic patients. We included 26 patients: 16 continued with their current antiretroviral therapy (control group) and 10 patients received a concomitant 24-week course of RBV plus pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) α-2b therapy (HCV-treated group).

Methods

We assessed peripheral blood mononuclear cells mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content and mitochondrial respiratory chain (MRC) function at baseline and at 24 weeks of follow-up. In the HCV-treated group we performed additional determinations at 12 weeks during anti-HCV therapy and 24 weeks after finishing anti-HCV therapy.

Results

Times on ddI or d4T exposure were 194 ±54.9 and 131 ±66.5 weeks in the HCV-treated and control groups, respectively. There were no differences either in mtDNA content, the enzyme activity of MRC complexes or clinical parameters at baseline. Throughout the study, mitochondrial measurements remained stable within groups and without differences when we compared HCV-treated and control groups.

Conclusions

In our study, the addition of RBV and PEG-IFN during a 24-week period in HCV/HIV non-cirrhotic, asymptomatic patients on long-term ddI, d4T or both had no impact on mitochondrial function. These findings could suggest that additional triggers are required to achieve a critical threshold in the degree of mitochondrial damage needed for symptoms to develop.

Peginterferon Alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected patients

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly prevalent and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality among persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We compared the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alfa-2a (peginterferon alfa-2a) plus either ribavirin or placebo with those of interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic HCV infection in patients who were also infected with HIV.

METHODS

A total of 868 persons who were infected with both HIV and HCV and who had not previously been treated with interferon or ribavirin were randomly assigned to receive one of three regimens: peginterferon alfa-2a (180 microg per week) plus ribavirin (800 mg per day), peginterferon alfa-2a plus placebo, or interferon alfa-2a (3 million IU three times a week) plus ribavirin. Patients were treated for 48 weeks and followed for an additional 24 weeks. The primary end point was a sustained virologic response (defined as a serum HCV RNA level below 50 IU per milliliter at the end of follow-up, at week 72).

RESULTS

The overall rate of sustained virologic response was significantly higher among the recipients of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin than among those assigned to interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin (40 percent vs. 12 percent, P<0.001), or peginterferon alfa-2a plus placebo (40 percent vs. 20 percent, P<0.001). Among patients infected with HCV genotype 1, the rates of sustained virologic response were 29 percent with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin, 14 percent with peginterferon alfa-2a plus placebo, and 7 percent with interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin. The corresponding rates among patients infected with HCV genotype 2 or 3 were 62 percent, 36 percent, and 20 percent. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more common among patients treated with regimens that contained peginterferon alfa-2a, and anemia was more common among patients treated with regimens containing ribavirin.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients infected with both HIV and HCV, the combination of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin was significantly more effective than either interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin or peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy.

Liver fibrosis stage predicts early treatment outcomes with peginterferon plus ribavirin in HIV/hepatitis C virus co-infected patients

Thirty-six HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with peginterferon alpha-2a or 2b plus ribavirin were analysed in a prospective observational study. The were 15 (42%) treatment discontinuations; bt intent-to-treat virological responders were 19 (53%) at week 24. A higher fibrosis score predicted premature discontinuation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy and a lack of early virological response. Female sex and HCV genotype predicted early virological responses. Results support the early treatment of HCV in co-infected individuals.

The cellular pharmacology of nucleoside- and nucleotide-analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors and its relationship to clinical toxicities

Nucleoside- and nucleotide-analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) require intracellular phosphorylation for anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) activity and toxicity. Long-term toxicities associated with NRTIs may be related to overactivation of this process. In vitro experiments have shown increased rates of NRTI and endogenous nucleoside phosphorylation to be associated with cellular activation. Patients with advanced HIV disease often have overexpression of cytokines, which corresponds to an elevated cellular activation state. These patients also have higher rates of NRTI phosphorylation and NRTI toxicity, suggesting an interaction between a proinflammatory biological state, NRTI phosphorylation, and toxicity. Studies suggest that women may have higher rates of NRTI phosphorylation than do men, as well as increased risk for NRTI-induced toxicity. Future research is needed to understand the NRTI activation process and improve the long-term toxicity profile of NRTIs. Such research should include comparisons of NRTI phosphorylation according to sex and cellular activation state (i.e., elevated vs. low).