Outcome of operatively treated unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions

Surgical management and outcomes of pure sacroiliac joint dislocations: A systematic review

Introduction

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dislocations, particularly pure SIJ dislocations without associated fractures, represent a rare and complex subset of pelvic ring injuries. Given the intricate pelvic anatomy and the need to achieve both stability and functional recovery, the optimal surgical management for these injuries remains a topic of debate. This systematic review aims to evaluate the various surgical techniques employed in treating this rare and challenging injury and assess associated clinical outcomes and complications.

Materials and methods

A systematic review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies were searched in four databases: Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Medline. The selected articles were evaluated according to the criteria of levels of evidence. The included studies were analyzed using the Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) criteria for quality assessment. This paper was registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).

Results

The review identified four studies. The surgical techniques varied across studies, with percutaneous fixation, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and combined approaches being the most reported methods. Clinical outcomes generally indicated satisfactory pain relief and functional recovery (Majeed score 57-90), though the rates of complications, including hardware failure (4-17 %) and infection (17-32 %), were notable. The results also highlighted that anatomical reduction and stable fixation are crucial for optimizing outcomes and minimizing complications. However, the heterogeneity of the data, especially the timing of surgery and surgical technique, precluded a formal meta-analysis.

Conclusions

Surgical management of pure SIJ dislocations presents significant challenges due to the complex biomechanics of the pelvic ring. While various surgical techniques have been employed with generally positive outcomes, the lack of high-quality, large-scale studies limits the ability to establish definitive guidelines. Early definitive treatment of these injuries and anatomical reduction of the SIJ are the main factors to improve clinical outcomes and reduce complication rates.

Level of evidence

IV.

Association between sacroiliac joint reduction quality and acetabular fracture alignment: a comparative study of the lateral window and pararectus approaches

PURPOSE

Simultaneous ipsilateral sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injury and acetabular fracture are relatively common. Inadequate SIJ reduction may compromise the anatomical alignment of associated acetabular fractures. However, the optimal surgical approach for managing both injuries remains uncertain. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of pelvic ring injury reduction using either the lateral window or the pararectus approach and to analyze associated radiological outcomes in patients with concurrent SIJ injury and acetabular fracture.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 44 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for SIJ injury. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: L group (lateral window of the ilioinguinal approach) and P group (pararectus approach). A subgroup of patients with simultaneous ipsilateral SIJ injury and acetabular fracture was selected for comparative analysis using postoperative computed tomography (CT) to assess SIJ reduction and acetabular fracture alignment.

RESULTS

Improvements in SIJ distance on axial and coronal CT planes were observed in both groups, with greater reductions observed in the P group. Among patients with combined injuries, the P group demonstrated significantly improved SIJ reduction in the coronal plane (P = 0.008), which was associated with smaller residual fracture gaps and articular step-offs in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes.

CONCLUSION

When ORIF is indicated for SIJ injury, the pararectus approach may offer enhanced SIJ reduction in the coronal plane. This technique is also associated with improved acetabular fracture alignment in patients with simultaneous ipsilateral injuries.

Evolution of the reduction technique for unstable pelvic ring fractures: a narrative review

Unstable pelvic ring fractures are associated with high mortality and morbidity, and the quality of reduction is critical to the prognosis. While previous reviews have examined general fracture reduction techniques, there is limited focus on the specific advancements and challenges in the reduction technique of unstable pelvic ring fractures. The pelvic fracture reduction technique has undergone a four-stage evolution: open reduction, conventional closed reduction, navigation-assisted closed reduction, and robot-assisted automatic closed reduction. This review discusses and compares the features, effectiveness, and safety of each reduction technique. Open reduction improves clinical outcomes compared to nonsurgical management; however, it is no longer commonly practiced due to its association with extensive soft tissue damage. Although conventional closed reduction is minimally invasive and reduces intraoperative blood loss, surgical duration, and the length of hospital stay, frequent fluoroscopy is required to assess the reduction position, imposing a high risk of radiation exposure. Computer-aided navigation technology has advanced closed reduction techniques by allowing better visualization of the fracture site and surgical instruments, thereby enhancing the quality of pelvic fracture reduction and reducing radiation exposure. The recently developed robot-assisted automatic reduction technique relieves the burden on orthopedic surgeons and further reduces intraoperative radiation exposure. Future advancements in the pelvic reduction technique may involve big data-based intelligent reduction to enable broader indications such as bilateral pelvic fractures.

Accuracy in navigated percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation of pelvic fragility fractures is increasingly being used to maintain mobility and reduce pain in the elderly patient population. Traditionally, this is performed using 2D fluoroscopy. Several newer, navigated techniques have emerged that may further facilitate this procedure. It, however, remains unclear whether there is a benefit regarding accuracy, radiation exposure and complications of these new navigation techniques when compared to the traditional 2D fluoroscopy.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. PubMed, CENTRAL and Embase were searched for both randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing new navigation techniques to 2D fluoroscopy for percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation. Effect estimates were pooled (random effects) and presented as odds ratio, mean difference and standardized mean difference with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

19 studies were included. The 2D fluoroscopy group had 642 patients and the new navigation group 663 patients. Accuracy was significantly higher in the new navigation group (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.53-3.90), especially O-Arm, 3D CT and Robotic navigation. On average, accuracy was 82% in the 2D group and 92% in the new navigation group, which was significant. Also, fluoroscopy time (MD 71.89 s, 95% CI 51.37-92.41) and frequency (MD 17.22 images in total, 95% CI 7.73-26.70) were significantly reduced in the new navigation group. Complications are acceptably low, however, poorly reported in both groups.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated a higher accuracy, lower fluoroscopic frequency and time for new navigation techniques compared to 2D fluoroscopy. More advanced navigation techniques, such as 3D CT and robotic navigation, appeared to be even better.

Triangular Screw Placement to Treat Dysmorphic Sacral Fragility Fractures in Osteoporotic Bone Results in an Equivalent Stability to Cement-Augmented Sacroiliac Screws-A Biomechanical Cadaver Study

Background: Sacroiliac screw fixation in elderly patients with pelvic fractures remains a challenging procedure for stabilization due to impaired bone quality. To improve it, we investigated the biomechanical properties of combined oblique sacroiliac and transiliosacral screw stabilization versus the additional cement augmentation of this construct in a cadaver model of osteoporotic bone, specifically with respect to the maximal force stability and fracture-site motion in the displacement and rotation of fragments. Methods: Standardized complete sacral fractures with intact posterior ligaments were created in osteoporotic cadaver pelvises and stabilized with a triangle of two oblique sacroiliac screws from each side with an additional transiliosacral screw in S1 (n = 5) and using the same pelvises with additional cement augmentation (n = 5). A short cyclic loading protocol was applied, increasing the axial force up to 125 N. Sacral fracture-site motion in displacement and rotation of the fragments was measured by optical motion tracking. Results: A maximum force of 65N +/- 12.2 N was achieved using the triangular screw stabilization of the sacrum. Cement augmentation did not provide any significant gain in maximum force (70 N +/- 29.2 N). Only low fragment displacement was observed (2.6 +/- 1.5 mm) and fragment rotation (1.3 +/- 1.2°) without increased stability (3.0 +/- 1.5 mm; p = 0.799; 1.7 +/- 0.4°; p = 0.919) following the cement augmentation. Conclusions: Triangular stabilization using two obliques and an additional transiliosacral screw provides sufficient primary stability of the sacrum. Still, the stability achieved seems very low, considering the forces acting in this area. However, additional cement augmentation did not increase the stability of the sacrum. Given its lack of beneficial abilities, it should be used carefully, due to related complications such as cement leakage or nerve irritation. Improving the surgical methods used to stabilize the posterior pelvic ring will be a topic for future research.

Treatment of unstable pelvic fractures with double INFIX

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the clinical efficacy of Double INFIX for the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 23 patients with unstable pelvic fractures treated using the Double INFIX minimally invasive technique. The cohort included five cases of Tile B1 type, eight cases of B2 type, six cases of B3 type, three cases of C1 type and one case of type C2. Pre- and postoperative evaluations included standardised pelvic serial films and three-dimensional CT scans. Key observational indicators were fracture reduction quality (assessed using Matta's criteria), fracture healing, functional recovery (evaluated with the Majeed function assessment criteria), and incidence of complications.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 24.48 ± 1.78 months. The average fracture healing time was 4.00 ± 1.41 months, and the average time for removal of fixation was 7.43 ± 1.75 months. Repeat imaging at 12 months postoperatively using Matta's criteria showed eight cases with excellent results (52.17%), 13 cases with good results (34.78%), three cases with fair results (13.04%), and no cases with poor results. The combined excellent and good rate was 86.96%, whereas the fair rate was 13.04%. The average Majeed hip joint function score at the final follow-up was 95.04 ± 1.72. Postoperative complications included meralgia paresthetica in two cases (8.7%) and sacrococcygeal discomfort in three patients when lying flat.

CONCLUSION

Double INFIX is a minimally invasive treatment technique with adequate clinical efficacy for managing unstable pelvic fractures.

Outcome of pelvic ring injuries

Outcome evaluation is of major importance to provide data to analyze the value of the chosen treatment concept. Despite an increasing effort of analyzing outcome after treatment of different pelvic ring injuries, a mixture of different outcome parameters is in use. The Majeed score is most frequently used for mid- to long-term evaluation and the quality of life is analyzed using the SF-36 score. The lack in nearly all studies is that different treatment concepts are used, and only selected evaluation parameters are reported. Until today, no well-accepted standardized measurement instruments are available to analyze the clinical and radiological results after pelvic ring injuries. Overall, stability-based long-term sequelae can be expected with increasing complaints from stable type A injuries to completely unstable type C injuries. Beside a fracture-type specific treatment, concomitant injuries of other injury regions and associated local pelvic injuries (complex pelvic trauma) seem to additionally influence the results. Results of treatment of specific fracture types are sparse as a wide range of different injury types and different treatment concepts are analyzed within these analyses. A sufficient pelvic outcome instrument which addresses relevant pelvic outcome parameters is still missing. Thus, future evaluation of long-term results after pelvic ring. injuries should include prospective, multicenter outcome studies with comparable parameters.

Is patient-reported outcome after treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries related to pelvic symmetry? A prospective study

PURPOSE

To determine the relation between pelvic symmetry, as measured by the cross-measurement technique, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in terms of functional status and health-related quality of life.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, X and Y measurements were taken according to the cross-measurement technique on AP radiographs of patients who were treated for an unstable pelvic ring injury in a level-1 trauma center. Patients completed PROMs at the time of admission (recalled pre-injury score) and one year following their injury, reporting their functional status with the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA-NL), specifically the lower extremity dysfunction (LED), problems with daily activities (PDA) and mental and emotional problems (MEP) subscales, and quality of life with EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). Subgroup analyses were also performed. PROMs were used to analyze the relation between pelvic symmetry and patient-reported outcome, using Spearman's Rank correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients (mean age 58 (SD18) years) with an unstable pelvic ring injury were included, of which 95 (73%) sustained type-B injuries and 35 (27%) type-C injuries. Sixty-three (49%) patients were treated operatively. The median pelvic symmetry ratio was 1.01 (IQR: 0.05). Weak or no correlations were found between the pelvic symmetry scores and the outcome measurements (Spearman's correlation coefficients: LED r = 0.09; PDA r = 0.11; MEP r=-0.02; and EQ-5D r=-0.08). Subgroup analyses revealed no correlations.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant relation was found between pelvic symmetry, measured radiologically, and functional status and health-related quality of life, one year following an unstable pelvic ring injury.

Recovery after neurologic injury in operative acetabular and pelvic fractures: Defining the natural history of foot drop

INTRODUCTION

Dorsiflexion weakness, or footdrop, is a well-described sequela of high-energy acetabular and pelvic trauma, but little data exists describing the factors related to neurologic recovery and the timeline therein. An improved understanding of these factors would facilitate prognostication, patient education, and treatment decision-making. The aim of this study was to compare neurologic recovery between acetabular and pelvic fractures, delineate factors associated with recovery, and determine the expected timeline of recovery.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted at a level 1 tertiary referral center from 2000 to 2021 using CPT codes and keyword search functions to identify adult patients with neurologic injury in the setting of operative acetabular and/or pelvic ring trauma. Patients were included if they had documented, graded weakness not clearly explained by a concomitant injury (extremity or spine) following a pelvic/acetabular injury. Patients were followed to a minimum of 6 months follow-up or to neurologic recovery. Primary outcomes were the presence of motor recovery and time to initial and maximum recovery. The contributions of injury type and initial neurologic status were analyzed using logistic regression for impact on neurologic recovery.

RESULTS

We identified 121 patients with neurologic injury and resultant footdrop in the setting of an operative pelvic ring or acetabular fracture. From this cohort, 58 patients (47.9 %) demonstrated some degree of neurologic recovery in follow-up. There was no difference in recovery when comparing injury type (pelvis vs. acetabulum). Any motor function (including flicker) at time of initial evaluation was predictive of recovery (OR 6.18, [2.00 - 19.14]; p = 0.002). Initial neurologic function also correlated with more rapid recovery in comparison to patients with initial absent neurologic function both in time to initial recovery (56 days vs 107 days; p = 0.016) and time to maximum recovery (153 days vs 241 days; p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight the relatively poor prognosis for neurologic recovery in operative pelvic and acetabular injuries. Any initial neurologic function is predictive of likelihood of neurologic recovery and correlates with a more expedient neurologic recovery. Ultimately, this enables providers to better educate patients and facilitates decisions regarding further intervention.

Functional and Radiological Outcome of Anterior Plate Stabilisation of the Sacroiliac Joint in Unstable Pelvic Injury

Introduction

Sacroiliac joint disruption, resulting from high energy trauma can cause significant morbidity if no proper treatment given. Many techniques can be used to stabilise pelvic ring injuries. We studied the functional and radiological outcome following open reduction and anterior fixation of the sacroiliac joint and agreement between both outcomes.

Material and Methods

This retrospective study involved 15 patients with unstable pelvic injuries requiring surgical intervention from January 2015 to December 2020 who undergone anterior stabilisation of the sacroiliac joint. Radiological outcome assessments were done postoperatively by using Lindahl criteria. The complete functional outcome was assessed at least six months postoperatively when patients were able to weight bear by using Majeed system. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 27.

Results

The participants consist of 73.3% male and 26.7% female patients. A total of 66.7% of patients had a Tile type B pelvic ring injury, and the remaining 33.3% had a Tile type C pelvic ring injury. Based on the Majeed system, 73.3% of patients had excellent functional outcomes, and based on Lindahl criteria; there were 60% of patients who had excellent radiological outcome. However, there was no significant agreement between functional and radiological outcomes.

Conclusion

Definitive fixation of the sacroiliac joint by anterior plate stabilisation provided an excellent functional and radiological outcome mainly due to good anatomical reduction and mechanical stability. However, further study may be needed to evaluate the correlation between functional and radiological outcomes and compare the various method of fixation with a larger sample size.

Fluoroscopic images of the sacroiliac joint alone are unable to identify simulated flexion or extension malreduction of the anterior pelvic ring in AO/OTA 61-B2.3 pelvic injuries

PURPOSE

Reduction of AO/OTA 61-B2.3 (APC2) pelvic fractures is challenging in the setting of anterior ring comminution. The anterior ring is visually much simpler to evaluate for flexion or extension hemipelvis deformity than the posterior ring, except in the setting of comminution, necessitating some other visual reference to judge hemipelvis reduction. We sought to test whether pelvic inlet and outlet fluoroscopy of the contours of the sacroiliac joint could be used in isolation to judge hemipelvis flexion or extension.

METHODS

Symphyseal and anterior SIJ ligaments were cut (6 cadaveric pelvis). The symphysis was held malreduced to produce one centimeter flexion and extension deformity: 1 cm was selected to mimic a maximum clinical scenario. The SIJ was assessed using inlet and outlet fluoroscopy. The scaled width of the SIJ was assessed at the joint apertures and midjoint on both inlet and outlet views. Joint widths in flexion and extension were compared against joint widths measured on the reduced SIJ using paired t-tests.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in the superior (p = 0.227, 0.675), middle (p = 0.203, 0.693), and inferior (p = 0.232, 0.961) SIJ widths between hemipelvis flexion or extension models against reduced SIJ on outlet views. There was no statistical difference in the anterior (p = 0.731, 0.662), middle (p = 0.257, 0.655), and posterior (p = 0.657, 0.363) SIJ widths between flexion or extension models against reduced SIJ on inlet views.

CONCLUSION

Inspection of SIJ width on inlet and outlet fluoroscopy cannot detect up to one centimeter of hemipelvis flexion or extension malreduction in the setting of AO/OTA 61-B2.3 (APC2) pelvic fractures with complex anterior injuries.

Navigation and 3D-imaging in pelvic ring surgery: a systematic review of prospective comparative studies

BACKGROUND

Few literature reviews have been published focusing on navigation, robotic or pre-operative planning using 3D-imaging technology (3D-printing, 3D-planning). To our knowledge, no reviews have been performed to assess and compare all these modalities together versus control groups (conventional fluoroscopy) through high Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) and Prospective Control Studies (PCSs). The aim of this study was to assess and compare 3D-imaging technologies from pre-operative planning to per-operative navigation and robotic in the management of pelvic ring fractures through high level studies.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed, the Cochrane library and Google scholar using keywords up to December 2023. Only prospective comparative studies (RCT and PCS) were included. A total of 341 articles were identified, 39 articles were selected for full-text analysis leaving 7 articles included in this literature systematic review.

RESULTS

A trend towards improved precision in screw placement and reduction of radiation exposure without consequences in term of functional outcomes have been identified. No conclusions can be extrapolated regarding operative time and blood loss except for robotic which improve these parameters because robotic arm assistance help surgeons to correctly follow the planning based on 2D-fluoroscopy. Surgery duration and radiation dose are significantly reduced with robotic-arm assistance for the same reasons. With navigation the results have to be nuanced according to the experience of the surgical team. Interest of navigation is emphasized in sacral dysmorphism in comparison with conventional fluoroscopy. This highlights the benefits of navigation for ilio-sacral screw placement in difficult cases and less experimented teams.

CONCLUSION

High level studies which assess and compare 3D-imaging technologies from pre-operative planning to per-operative navigation and robotic in the management of pelvic ring fractures are low. To date and according to the present high level literature, navigation and 3D-technologies in pelvic ring surgery should be recommended for difficult cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE, II

Systematic review of Level II studies.

Anterior Sacroiliac Fracture Dislocation: A Comparative Radiologic analysis of Crescent Fractures in Pelvic Ring Injuries: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: Anterior sacroiliac fracture dislocation (ASFD), also known as locked pelvis, is a rarely reported diagnosis. The types of ASFDs are often misdiagnosed as lateral compression fractures due to the presence of crescent fractures. In this study, we distinguished ASFD from lateral compression fractures (LC 2) and studied their characteristics. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study involving patients from a Level 1 trauma center. Fifty-nine patients under the age of 65 years with crescent fractures caused by a high-energy mechanism were investigated. Results: The incidence of ASFD was 25% (15 of 59) in patients with crescent fractures. Among the 15 patients, 6 had override of the ilium over the sacrum, inhibiting reduction in the sacroiliac joint. Pre-operative radiographic evaluations revealed that vertical displacement of the ASFD was larger than that of lateral compression fracture (LC 2) in the outlet view (mean 9.5 vs. 1.9 mm, p = 0.013), and the pelvic asymmetry ratio was larger in ASFD (mean 7.8 vs. 4.1, p = 0.006) in the pelvis AP view. All patients achieved union after surgery. Post-operative radiography showed no significant vertical displacement difference. There was no difference in vascular injury or hemodynamic instability requiring embolization or preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) between the two groups. Conclusions: Patients with ASFD have greater vertical displacement and asymmetry compared to patients with LC 2 fractures. These fractures must be distinguished for appropriate reduction and anterior plate fixation.

Plate fixation of inferior ramus in pubis-ischium ramus improves mechanical stability in Tile B pelvic injures: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis and early clinical experience

BACKGROUND

Management of inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus remains controversial, and related research is sparse. The main intention of this study is to describe the biomechanical and clinical outcomes of pubis-ischium ramus fractures in Tile B pelvic injuries and to identify the feasibility and necessity of fixation of the inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus.

METHODS

This study comprised two parts: a biomechanical test and a retrospective clinical study. For the biomechanical tests, Tile B-type pelvic injuries were modeled in six cadaver specimens by performing pubis-ischium osteotomies and disruption of the anterior and interosseous sacroiliac ligaments. The superior and/or inferior rami of the pubis-ischium ramus were repaired with reconstruction plates and separated into three groups (A, B, and C). Specimens were placed in the standing position and were loaded axially with two-leg support for three cycles at 500 N. The displacements of sacroiliac joints at osteotomy were measured with Vernier calipers and compared using statistical software. To investigate the clinical outcomes of this technique, 26 patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a superior ramus fixation group (Group D) and a combined superior and inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus fixation group (Group E). The main outcome measures were time of operation, blood loss, postoperative radiographic reduction grading, and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

In the vertical loading test, Group E showed better pelvic ring stability than Group D (P < 0.05). However, the shift of the sacroiliac joints was almost identical among the three groups. In our clinical case series, all fractures in Group E achieved bony union. Group E demonstrated earlier weight-bearing functional exercise (2.54 ± 1.45 vs 4.77 ± 2.09; P = 0.004), earlier bony union (13.23 ± 2.89 vs 16.55 ± 3.11; P = 0.013), and better functional outcomes (89.77 ± 7.27 vs 82.38 ± 8.81; P = 0.028) than Group D. The incidence of sexual dysfunction was significantly lower in Group E than that in Group D (2/13 vs 7/13; P = 0.039). Bone nonunion occurred in two patients in Group D, and two patients in Group E had heterotopic ossification. None of the patients exhibited wound complications, infections, implant failures, or bone-implant interface failures.

CONCLUSIONS

Fixation of the inferior ramus of a pubis-ischium ramus fracture based on conventional fixation of the anterior pelvic ring is mechanically superior in cadaveric Tile B pelvic injury and shows rapid recovery, good functional outcomes, and low incidence of complications.

A Comparative Study of Functional Outcomes in Unstable Pelvic Ring Fractures Treated With Internal Fixator (INFIX) With and Without Sacroiliac Joint Screw Fixation

Introduction Despite constituting only 3-8% of orthopedic trauma cases, pelvic injuries are associated with high mortality rates, emphasizing the critical need for stable fixation rather than merely anatomical alignment. The use of an anterior, subcutaneous, internal pelvic fixator (INFIX), a novel technique, has shown promise in treating these injuries. Posterior pelvic ring injuries are challenging because they require a significant level of surgical training and technical expertise, and each treatment method has disadvantages. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and biomechanical outcomes of INFIX with and without sacroiliac screw fixation for unstable pelvic fractures. Methods and methodology Retrospectively, we selected 20 patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries who had come to a high-volume tertiary care hospital and medical college in the state of Maharashtra, India. All the patients were operated on with INFIX; 10 with a sacroiliac joint screw and 10 without a sacroiliac joint screw. We followed up with the patients for six months and evaluated them according to the Majeed score. Results Functional outcomes differed little between INFIX patients operated on with and without a sacroiliac joint screw. However, morbidity, hospital stay, the need for ICU, radiation exposure, and technical ease of surgery were improved in INFIX patients without the sacroiliac screw procedure. We noted an average Majeed score of 78 in the INFIX-alone group and 77.2 in the group that received INFIX with a sacroiliac joint screw. Six months after the surgery, the patients showed signs of a stable bony union, had achieved a full range of motion, and reported no problems in their day-to-day work. Conclusion Although this was a short-term study, we conclude that INFIX without a sacroiliac joint screw showed a comparable functional outcome compared to INFIX with a sacroiliac joint screw. Patients with INFIX alone showed better results; they had reduced surgical time, reduced radiation exposure, and less evidence of neurological harm to the L5-S1 nerve root. The procedure was less complicated and easier for surgeons to learn. Its simplicity and speed were especially beneficial for obese patients.

Functional outcome and analysis of factors affecting health-related quality of life of surgically managed pelvic ring fractures: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic ring fractures, particularly those involving the posterior pelvis, pose significant challenges due to their inherent instability. The posterior pelvic ring is critical in providing structural support and stability to the pelvis. This study evaluates the functional outcomes and health-related Quality of life (HRQOL) of patients who underwent internal fixation for unstable pelvic fractures. Various factors influencing the outcomes are also investigated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with unstable sacral fractures treated with posterior tension band plate or sacroiliac plating with or without symphyseal plating between 2016 and 2020. Patient demographics, injury mechanisms, associated injuries, surgical details, complications, and return-to-work data were collected. HRQOL was assessed using specific pelvic fracture instruments and general HRQOL questionnaires. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with lower SF-12 and SF-36 scores RESULTS: The study included 54 patients, predominantly males (55.6%), aged 18-70 years, with high-energy trauma mechanisms, such as road traffic accidents and occupational injuries. The majority of patients had lateral compression pelvic fractures. Overall, the functional outcomes were favorable, with excellent or good outcomes observed in 86.1% of cases. Patients with associated injuries, such as abdominal, chest, or head injuries, were likelier to have lower SF-12 physical component scores. Sexual satisfaction scores remained stable for most patients post-surgery.

DISCUSSION

This study highlights the favorable functional outcomes and HRQOL for patients undergoing fixation for unstable pelvic ring fractures. Younger, working-age males were the most commonly affected demographic. Associated injuries significantly affected physical HRQOL scores. Despite high-energy trauma, patients generally reported satisfactory sexual function post-surgery.

Intelligent robot-assisted fracture reduction system for the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures

BACKGROUND

Precise and minimally invasive closed reduction is the premise of minimally invasive internal fixation. This paper aims to explore the safety and efficacy of a robot-assisted fracture reduction system (RAFR) in the treatment of pelvic fractures and to analyze its clinical advantages and existing problems.

METHODS

The RAFR system intelligently designed the optimal reduction path and target position based on a preoperative three-dimensional(3D) CT scan of the patient. The reduction robotic arm automatically reduced the affected hemipelvis according to the pre-planned reduction path.

RESULTS

The average residual displacement was the 6.65 ± 3.59 mm. According to Matta's criteria, there were 7 excellent, 10 good, and 3 fair, and the excellent and good rate was 85%. No postoperative complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

In our study, the RAFR system could complete accurate and minimally invasive closed reduction for most patients with unstable pelvic fractures, which could achieve good fracture reduction quality and short-term efficacy.

Critical distance of the sacroiliac joint for open reduction using screw fixation for traumatic sacroiliac joint diastasis: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Osteosynthesis for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) diastasis using an iliosacral screw (ISS) and a trans-iliac-trans-sacral screw (TITSS) can be performed using a closed or an open method. However, no clear indication for open reduction has been established.

METHODS

Data on patients with unilateral traumatic SIJ diastasis who underwent ISS and TITSS fixation were retrospectively collected and separated into groups according to the reduction method: closed reduction group (C group) and open reduction group (O group). Demographic data and perioperative image assessments were compared between the groups. The critical distance of the SIJ was identified to elucidate the indication for open reduction of the diastatic SIJ.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients met the inclusion criteria over a 3-year period. There was no significant difference in the reduction quality of pelvic ring injuries between the groups, according to Matta's and Lefaivre's criteria. The improvement in the SIJ distance was significantly greater in the O group than in the C group in the axial plane on multiplanar computed tomography (p = 0.021). This model predicted that a difference of > 3.71 mm between the injured and healthy SIJ was a recommended indication for open reduction, with an area under the curve of 0.791 (95% confidence interval 0.627-0.955, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Open reduction for SIJ diastasis might achieve better reduction quality than does closed reduction in the axial plane in selected cases. When the difference between the injured and healthy SIJ was wider than 3.71 mm, open reduction was recommended for satisfactory radiological outcomes.

Less Invasive Triangular Osteosynthesis in the Management of AO Type-B Unstable Sacral Fractures

Objective: This prospective cohort study investigated the clinical and radiological efficacy of triangular osteosynthesis (TO) in the management of AO type-B unstable sacral fractures.Methods: All patients with unstable AO type-B sacral fractures were included in this study. They were evaluated clinically and radiologically and underwent TO. Pre- and postoperative clinical parameters included the visual analogue score (VAS) for back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Gibbon classification. Radiological parameters included x-rays and multislice 3-dimensional computed tomography scans of the pelvis and the Tornetta and Matta criteria for fracture reduction.Results: This study included 30 patients (17 males and 13 females; mean age, 31.63±9.65 years). The reported causes of trauma were a fall from height in 17 patients, road traffic accident in 11 patients, and hard objects falling onto the pelvis in 2 patients. According to the AO spine sacral fracture classification system, 8 cases were type B2 and 22 were type B3. At the last postoperative follow-up, the mean VAS improved from 7.77±1.19 preoperatively to 3.97±1.59 (p<0.001), the mean ODI was 15.27±3.34, and the Gibbon classification of cauda equina injury improved from 2.87±0.97 preoperatively to 1.27±0.52 (p<0.001). According to Tornetta and Matta criteria for fracture reduction, the results were excellent (<4 mm) in 73.3% of patients, good (4–10 mm) in 20%, and fair (10–20 mm) in 6.7%. All patients experienced complete fracture healing.Conclusion: TO is a less invasive, safe, and effective option for the management of unstable AO type-B sacral fractures with good clinical and radiological outcomes.

Risk factors for pubic ramus fracture nonunion after conservative treatment of pelvic ring injuries: a retrospective cohort multicenter study

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of nonunion, clinical and radiological outcomes, and risk factors for nonunion in conservatively treated pubic ramus fractures among patients diagnosed with pelvic ring injury.

METHODS

A total of 546 patients (192 men, 354 women) diagnosed with pubic ramus fracture, treated conservatively, and who had completed > 1 year follow-up at three level 1 trauma centers between January 2014 and December 2020, were enrolled. Clinical and radiological evaluations were compared between union and nonunion groups. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used.

RESULT

At the final follow-up, 527 (96.5%) and 19 (3.5%) patients had union and nonunion of fractures, respectively. The union and nonunion groups exhibited statistically significant differences in posterior injury (p = 0.040), bilateral ramus fracture (p < 0.001), initial displacement (p < 0.001), and clinical result (p < 0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, initial displacement (odds ratio, 4.727; p = 0.005) was analyzed as a risk factor for nonunion. According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median initial displacement of nonunion occurrence was 17.9 mm (standard error, 1.211; 95% confidence interval 15.526-20.274), and nonunion patients were included if the displacement was > 15.9 mm (standard error, 1.305) on the 75th percentile.

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment is ineffective in some ramus fracture cases with pelvic ring injury. As ramus nonunion causes functional deterioration, active treatment is required if the displacement is ≥ 16 mm.

Surgical Management of Unstable U-Shaped Sacral Fractures and Tile C Pelvic Ring Disruptions: Institutional Experience in Light of a Narrative Literature Review

Unstable U-shaped sacral fractures and vertical shear Tile C pelvic ring disruptions are characterized by rare lesions occurring in patients with severe trauma. Because the initial damage-control resuscitation primarily aims to stop life-threatening bleeding, emergency treatment often includes an anterior external pelvic fixator. Delayed surgery is mandatory to allow early mobilization, reduce mortality, and improve functional outcomes. Regarding U-shaped sacral fractures, although Roy-Camille type 1 U-shaped sacral fractures can be treated with iliosacral screws, types 2 (posteriorly displaced, equivalent to AO Spine C3) and 3 (anteriorly displaced, equivalent to AO Spine C3) fractures require spinopelvic triangular fixation. Besides, proper reduction of type 2 and some type 3 sacral fractures is mandatory to prevent wound complications. In patients with neurological deficits, the need for sacral laminectomy is left at the discretion of the surgeon, given the indirect decompression already obtained with fracture reduction. Tile C pelvic disruptions with posterior ring injury located lateral to the sacral foramen can be treated with either iliosacral screws or triangular spinopelvic fixation, combined with anterior pelvic fixation. Conversely, Tile C pelvic disruptions with posterior ring injury located at, or medial, to the sacral foramen (Denis zone II or III) induce vertical lumbosacral instability and thus require spinopelvic triangular fixation with anterior pelvic osteosynthesis. Although minimally invasive techniques have been developed, open surgeries are still required for inexperienced operators and in case of major displacement. The complication rate reaches approximately 33.33% of the cases, and complications include hardware malposition, wound infection or dehiscence, hardware prominence, and sometimes hardware failure.

Clinical study of modified INFIX combined with sacroiliac joint screws for pelvic instable injuries

OBJECTIVE

The INFIX technique is becoming one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures for anterior pelvic ring instability injuries. The purpose of this article is to compare the clinical outcomes of modified anterior subcutaneous internal fixation (M-INFIX) with conventional anterior subcutaneous internal fixation (C-INFIX) for anterior pelvic ring instability injuries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 36 cases of unstable pelvic injuries treated operatively at our institution, 20 of which were treated with C-INFIX and 16 with M-INFIX. Data collected included age, gender, ISS score, fracture typing, operative time, operative bleeding, postoperative complications, fracture healing time, Matta score, Majeed score, and follow-up time. Statistical sub-folding of each variable between the two groups was performed.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between the C-INFIX and M-INFIX groups in terms of age, gender, ISS (Injury Severity Score), follow-up time, fracture typing, fracture healing time, and Majeed score (P > 0.05). the M-INFIX had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications than the C-INFIX group, especially in the incidence of Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury (P < 0.05). In contrast, the M-INFIX group had statistically higher operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and Matta score than the C-INFIX group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study was based on a modified application of the surgical experience with C-INFIX and showed better clinical outcomes in terms of complication rates and quality of repositioning than the conventional surgical approach. These findings indicate that further analytical studies of this study would be valuable.

Comparison of Computer-Assisted Navigation and 3D Printed Patient-Specific Template for the Iliosacral Screw Placement

BACKGROUND

Iliosacral screw insertion by computer-assisted navigation gradually became the main technique in some hospitals, but the expensive price limited the extensive application. But other techniques such as 3D printed template was used to place iliosacral screw as novel method. This study was to compare the efficiency of percutaneous iliosacral screw placement by using patient-specific template and computer-assisted navigation.

METHODS

Total of 58 patients from September 2017 to September 2021 with sacral injury were treated operatively with percutaneous screw technique, which was selected for this retrospective analysis and divided into two groups (template and computer-assisted navigation). There were 31 patients in template group and 27 patients in computer-assisted navigation group. The surgical details (operation time, blood loss, number of screw placements, and number of fluoroscopies), complications, radiographic and clinical results were recorded. The quality of reduction was assessed by the Matta scoring system. T-test and rank-sum test was used in this study.

RESULTS

Operation time in template group was less (33.97 ± 16.61 < 60.31 ± 11.46 min, p < 0.01), but the preoperative preparation time was more (6.35 ± 1.60 > 5.41 ± 1.58, p < 0.05). The quality of reduction in both groups was no difference (p = 0.352). A patient was complicated with gluteal vessel injury in operation in navigation group, which was treated with ligation, but the same injury was not observed in template group. The related surgical data of patient with gluteal injury was ignored in statistical analysis.

CONCLUSION

Both of the two techniques could improve surgical efficiency, the operation time in template was less than computer-assisted navigation group, but the preoperative preparation time was more.

Higher pelvic incidence values are a risk factor for trans-iliac trans-sacral screw malposition in sacroiliac complex fracture treatment

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous iliosacral (IS) screw fixation and trans-iliac trans-sacral (TITS) screw fixation are clinically effective treatments of posterior pelvic sacroiliac fractures. In order to accurately assess the sacrum position relative to the pelvis, pelvic incidence (PI) is a commonly utilized radiographic parameter in sagittal view. This study aimed to investigate and compare the surgical outcomes and radiographic parameters of IS or TITS screw fixations for the treatment of posterior sacroiliac complex fractures with different PI values.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data on patients with posterior pelvic sacroiliac fractures who underwent percutaneous IS or TITS screw fixations, or both, at a single level I trauma center between January 2017 and June 2020 were reviewed. We documented the patient characteristics and fracture types, reviewed surgical records, and measured the radiographic parameters via plain films and multi-planar computed tomography (mpCT) images. Radiographic variations in PI, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, sacral dysmorphism, pelvic ring reduction quality, screw deviation angles, screw malposition grading, and iatrogenic complications were documented and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients were included, and 65 IS and 70 TITS screws were accounted for. Patients were divided into two groups according to screw fixation method and further divided into four sub-groups based on baseline PI values. The PI cutoff values were 49.85° and 48.05° in the IS and TITS screw groups, respectively, according to receiver operating characteristic analysis and Youden's J statistic. Smaller PI values were significantly correlated with sacral dysmorphism (p = 0.027 and 0.003 in the IS and TITS screw groups, respectively). Patients with larger PI values were at a significantly increased risk of screw malposition in the TITS screw group (p = 0.049), with no association in the IS screw group. Logistic regression confirmed that a larger PI value was a significant risk factor for screw malposition in the TITS screw group (p = 0.010). The post-operative outcomes improved from poor/fair (at 6 months) to good/average (at 12 months) based on the Postel Merle d'Aubigné and Majeed scores, with no significant differences between subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both percutaneous IS and TITS screw fixations are safe and effective treatments for posterior pelvic sacroiliac fractures. Due to the higher risk of screw malposition in patients with larger PI values, it is crucial to identify potential patients at risk when performing TITS screw fixation surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

A novel biplanar positioning technique to guide iliosacral screw insertion: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and benefits of the biplanar position technique on operative time, radiation exposure, and screw placement accuracy.

METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the records of 64 patients with pelvic fractures (Tile B and C) between October 2020 and September 2021. According to the surgical methods selected by the patients, the patients were divided into a biplanar positioning technique group (biplanar group), a Ti-robot navigation group (Ti-robot group), and a traditional fluoroscopy-guided technique group (traditional group). Length of operation, blood loss, intra-operative radiation exposure fracture reduction, and the quality of screw positioning were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

One hundred three screws were implanted in 64 patients (biplanar group 22, Ti-robot group 21, traditional group 21). The average operation time was significantly less in the biplanar group (26.32 ± 6.32 min) than in the traditional group (79.24 ± 11.31 min), but significantly more than in the Ti-robot group (15.81 ± 3.9 min). The radiation exposure was similar in the biplanar group (740.53 ± 185.91 cGy/cm2) and Ti-robot group (678.44 ± 127.16 cGy/cm2), both of which were significantly more than in the traditional group (2034.58 ± 494.54 cGy/cm2). The intra-operative blooding loss was similar in the biplanar group (12.76 ± 3.77 mL) and the Ti-robot group (11.92 ± 4.67 mL), both of which were significantly less than in the traditional group (29.7 ± 8.01 mL). The Screw perforation was slightly lower in the biplanar group (94.1%) than in the Ti-robot group (97.2%) but was significantly higher than in the traditional group (75.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The biplanar positioning technique is as accurate and safe as computer-navigated systems for percutaneous iliosacral screw insertion, associated with shorter surgical time, lower intra-operative radiation exposure, and more accuracy compared to traditional fluoroscopy.

Medium-term clinical results in patients with floating hip injuries

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of our strategy for managing floating hip injuries.

METHODS

From January 2014 and December 2019, all patients with a floating hip underwent surgical treatment in our hospital were included in the retrospective study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. All patients were managed according to a standardised strategy. Data on epidemiology, radiography, clinical outcomes and complications were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were enrolled, with an average age of 45 years. The mean follow-up was 36.9 months. According to the Liebergall classification, Type A floating hip injuries predominated (n = 15, 53.6%). Head and chest injuries were the most common associated injuries. When multiple operative settings were required, we prioritized the fixation of the femur fracture at the first operation. The mean time from injury to definitive femoral surgery was 6.1 days, with most (75%) femoral fractures treated with intramedullary fixation. More than half (54%) of acetabular fractures were treated with a single surgical approach. Pelvic ring fixation included isolated anterior fixation, isolated posterior fixation, combined anterior and posterior fixation, of which isolated anterior fixation was the most common. Postoperative radiographs suggested that the anatomic reduction rates of acetabulum and pelvic ring fractures were 54% and 70%, respectively. According to grading system of Merle d'Aubigne and Postel, 62% of patients achieved satisfactory hip function. Complications included delayed incision healing (7.1%), deep vein thrombosis (10.7%), heterotopic ossification (10.7%), femoral head avascular necrosis (7.1%), post-traumatic osteoarthritis (14.3%), fracture malunion (n = 2, 7.1%) and nonunion (n = 2, 7.1%). In the patients with complications described above, only two patients underwent resurgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is no difference in clinical outcomes and complications among different types of floating hip injuries, special attention should be paid to anatomical reduction of the acetabular surface and restoration of the pelvic ring. In addition, the severity of such compound injuries often exceeds that of an isolated injury and often requires specialised multidisciplinary management. Because of no standard guidelines for treatment of such injuries, our experience in the management of such a complex case is to fully assess the complexity of the injury and formulate an appropriate surgical plan based on the principles of damage control orthopaedics.

Intelligent robot-assisted minimally invasive reduction system for reduction of unstable pelvic fractures

OBJECTIVE

Currently, minimally invasive internal fixation is recommended for the surgical treatment of unstable pelvic fractures. The premise and difficulty of minimally invasive internal fixation are minimally invasive reduction of fractures. This review aimed to investigate the indications, surgical strategy and techniques, safety, and efficacy of intelligent robot-assisted fracture reduction (RAFR) system of pelvic ring injuries.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed a case series from March 2021 to November 2021. A total of 22 patients with unstable pelvic fracture injuries underwent minimally invasive internal fixations. All pelvic ring fractures were reduced with our intelligent RAFR system. The robot system intelligently designs the optimal position and reduction path based on the patient's preoperative 3D CT. During the operation, the three-dimensional visualization of the fracture is realized through image registration, and the Robot completes the automatic reduction of the fracture. The global 3D point cloud error between the preoperative planning results and the actual postoperative reduction results was calculated. The postoperative reduction results of residual displacement were graded by the Matta Criteria.

RESULTS

Minimally invasive closed reduction procedures were completed in all 22 cases with our RAFR system. The average global 3D point cloud reduction error between the preoperative planning results and the actual postoperative reduction results was 3.41mm±1.83mm. The mean residual displacement was 4.61mm±3.29mm. Given the Matta criteria, 16 cases were excellent, five were good, and one was fair, with an excellent and good rate of 95.5%.

CONCLUSION

Our new pelvic fracture reduction robot system can complete intelligent and minimally invasive fracture reduction for most patients with unstable pelvic fractures. The system has intelligent reduction position and path planning and realizes stable pelvis control through a unique holding arm and a robotic arm. The operation process will not cause additional damage to the patient, which fully meets the clinical requirements. Our study demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of our robotic reduction system and its applicability and usability in clinical practice, thus paving the way towards Robot minimally invasive pelvic fracture surgeries.

Lumbopelvic Fixation with Bridged Distal Iliac Screws for Vertically Unstable Sacral Fractures

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate preliminary outcomes of vertically unstable sacral fractures treated by lumbopelvic fixation (LPF) augmented transiliac bridged screws.

Methods

From April 2017 to December 2019, fifteen consecutive patients with vertically unstable sacral fractures who had undergone LPF augmented transiliac bridged screws were enrolled. The radiological assessment included standard lumbopelvic x-rays and pelvic computed tomography (CT) to evaluate the lumbosacral angle (LSA), sacral kyphosis angle (SKA), lumbar lordosis angles (LLA) and Matta's reduction criterias (MRC). Clinical and neurologic impairment outcomes were evaluated by the Majeed grading scale (MGS) and Gibbons criterias, respectively.

Results

All patients were followed for an average of 18 months (range, 14-25). All sacral fractures eventually healed and implant failure did not occur in any patient, though there were two patients with a loss of reduction (< 5 mm) during the follow-up period. According to the MRC, the results were excellent on 14 sides, good on five sides, and fair on one side. The MGS mean score was 82 points (range, 49-98 points); the results were excellent in nine cases, good in four cases, and fair in two cases. There was no statistically significant difference in SKA and LLA in preoperative and postoperative final controls. The preoperative and postoperative LSA were 72 ± 13.9 and 44.1 ± 11.3, respectively, and a statistically significant improvement was observed (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

In vertically unstable sacrum fractures, we believe that LPF augmented with transiliac bridging technique may expedite the reduction of vertical sacrum fracture and offers a reinforced fixation choice.

Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Transsacral Fixation Constructs in a Type 61C, Zone II Pelvic Fracture Model

OBJECTIVES

OTA/AO 61C pelvic ring injuries are vertically unstable because of complete sacral fractures combined with anterior ring injury. The objective of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of 4 transsacral screw constructs for posterior pelvic ring fixation, including one that uses a novel fixation method with a pair of locked washers with interdigitating cams.

METHODS

Type C pelvic ring disruptions were created on 16 synthetic pelvis models. Each pelvis was fixated with an S2 screw in addition to being allocated to 1 of 4 transsacral constructs through S1: (1) 8.0-mm screw, (2) 8.0-mm bolt, (3) 8.0-mm screw locked with a nut, and (4) 8.00-mm screw locked with a nut with the addition of interdigitating washers between the screw head and ilium on the near cortex, and ilium and nut on the far cortex. The anterior ring fractures were not stabilized. Each pelvis underwent 100,000 cycles at 250 N and was then loaded to failure using a unilateral stance testing model. The anterior and posterior osteotomy sites were instrumented with pairs of infrared (IR) light-emitting markers, and the relative displacement of the markers was monitored using a three-dimensional (3D) motion capture system. Displacement measurements at 25,000; 50,000; 75,000; and 100,000 cycles and failure force were recorded for each pelvis.

RESULTS

The novel washer design construct performed better than the screw construct with less posterior ring motion at 75,000 ( P = 0.029) and 100,000 cycles ( P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel interdigitating washer design may be superior to using a screw construct alone to achieve rigid, locked posterior ring fixation in a synthetic pelvis model with a Type C pelvic ring disruption.

Biomechanical study of anterior and posterior pelvic rings using pedicle screw fixation for Tile C1 pelvic fractures: Finite element analysis

Objective

The purpose of this study was to analyse the biomechanical characteristics of pedicle screws with different placement methods and diameters in the treatment of Tile C1 pelvic fractures by finite element simulation technology and to compare them with the plate fixation model to verify the effectiveness of pedicle screw fixation.

Methods

A three-dimensional digital model of a normal pelvis was obtained using computed tomography images. A finite element model of a normal pelvis containing major ligaments was built and validated (Model 1). Based on the verified normal pelvis finite element model, a Tile C1 pelvic fracture model was established (Model 2), and then a plate fixation model (Model 3) and a pedicle screw fixation model with different screw placement methods and diameters were established (Models 4–15). For all pelvic fracture fixation models, a vertical load of 500 N was applied on the upper surface of the sacrum to test the displacement and stress distribution of the pelvis in the standing state with both legs.

Results

The finite element simulation results showed the maximum displacement of Model 1 and Models 3–15 to be less than 1 mm. The overall maximum displacement of Models 4–15 was slightly larger than that of Model 3 (the maximum difference was 177.91×10⁻³ mm), but the maximum displacement of iliac bone and internal fixation in Models 4–15 was smaller than that of Model 3. The overall maximum stress (maximum stress of the ilium) and maximum stress of internal fixation in Models 4–15 were less than those in Model 3. The maximum displacement difference and maximum stress difference at the fracture of the pubic ramus between each fixed model were less than 0.01 mm and 1 MPa, respectively. The greater the diameter and number of pedicle screws were, the smaller the maximum displacement and stress of the pelvic fracture models were.The maximum displacement and stress of the pelvic fracture models of the screws placed on the injured side of the pubic region were smaller than the screws on the healthy side.

Conclusion

Both the anterior and posterior pelvic rings are fixed with a pedicle screw rod system for treatment of Tile C1 pelvic fractures, which can obtain sufficient biomechanical stability and can be used as a suitable alternative to other implants.The greater the diameter and number of pedicle screws were, the greater the pelvic stability was, and the greater was the stability of the screws placed on the injured side of the pubic region than the screws on the healthy side.

Simultaneous reduction and fixation of concomitant acetabular fracture and ipsilateral sacroiliac joint injury through the pararectus approach: a technical report and early radiological outcome

PURPOSE

Osteosynthesis for acetabular fractures with ipsilateral sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injuries remains challenging for orthopedic surgeons, despite the evolution of surgical approaches, such as the pararectus approach, and treatment sequences. The study aimed to describe the details of the treatment of acetabular fracture with ipsilateral SIJ injury by the pararectus approach and to report its surgical outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed patients with acetabular fractures and ipsilateral SIJ injuries undergoing osteosynthesis by the pararectus approach over a three-year period. Evaluation parameters of the quality of reduction of both acetabulum and pelvis injuries were, among others, Matta's criteria, Lefaivre's criteria, inlet/outlet ratios, and maximal gap measured on computed tomography (CT) scans.

RESULTS

Ten patients (seven men and three women) were enrolled. Pelvic ring injuries classified as AO B2.3 and acetabular fractures involving two columns were the most common fractures, accounting for 70% and 60%, respectively. Radiological evaluation for pelvic ring injury revealed three excellent and seven good results according to Matta's criteria, as well as five excellent, three good, and one fair results according to Lefaivre's criteria. Inlet and outlet ratios were between 0.84-1.06 and 0.93-1.60, respectively. The distance of the sacroiliac joints significantly improved postoperatively in both axial and coronal views (P = 0.002). Further, the maximal articular gap and step-off of acetabular fractures on axial, coronal, and sagittal view CT scans showed statistically significant improvements after osteosynthesis.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous reduction and fixation of acetabular fractures with ipsilateral SIJ injuries using the pararectus approach achieved satisfactory radiological outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

[TiRobot-assisted surgery by O-arm navigation system for percutaneous minimally invasive treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury]

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of TiRobot-assisted surgery by O-arm navigation system for percutaneous minimally invasive treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury.

Methods

The clinical data of 76 patients with posterior pelvic ring injury between January 2016 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 45 cases were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation assisted by TiRobot and O-arm navigation system (study group), 31 cases were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation under the guidance of C-arm X-ray machine (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, Tile classification, time from injury to operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the times of nail track adjustment, and intraoperative fluoroscopy times were recorded. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated by Matta score. At last follow-up, Majeed score was used to evaluate the recovery of pelvic function.

Results

A total of 72 screws were implanted in the study group, with a median of 1 (1, 2) screws per patient. In the control group, 47 screws were implanted, with a median of 1 (1, 2) screws per patient. There was no significant difference in the number of screws between the two groups ( Z=-0.392, P=0.695). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, times of nail track adjustment, and intraoperative fluoroscopy times in the study group were significantly less than those in the control group ( P<0.05). All patients were followed up 6-24 months (mean, 14 months). No serious complications was found after operation and during follow-up. Matta score was used to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction at 1 week after operation, and there was no significant difference between the two groups ( Z=-1.135, P=0.256). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference of Majeed score between the two groups ( Z=-1.279, P=0.201).

Conclusion

TiRobot-assisted surgery by O-arm navigation system is a reliable surgical method for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury, which can reduce the operation time and fluoroscopy times when compared with the traditional operation under the guidance of C-arm X-ray machine. The safety, accuracy, and efficiency of the operation were improved.

Multimodal Neuroelectrophysiological Monitoring Combined with Robot-Assisted Placement of a Transiliac–Transsacral Screw for the Treatment of Transforaminal Sacral Fractures

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the fixation of transforaminal sacral fractures using TiRobot-assisted transiliac-transsacral (TITS) screws under multimodal neuroelectrophysiological monitoring (MNM).

Methods

From January 2019 to May 2021, 22 patients (17 male and 5 female patients) with transforaminal sacral fractures who were treated with closed reduction and placement of TiRobot-assisted TITS screws under MNM were retrospectively evaluated. The average age of the patients was 43.32 ± 11.40 years (range: 19–63). The patients received MNM, including somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), and electromyographic monitoring (EMG), prior to surgery, during closed reduction and the placement of the guidewire and TITS screw, and at the end of surgery. The operation was adjusted according to the MNM results.

Results

Overall, 22 TITS screws were inserted in 22 patients, including 5 TITS screws in the S1 body and 17 TITS screws in the S2 body. The average time needed for screw placement was 27.95 ± 6.84 mins, and the average frequency of X-ray fluoroscopy exposures was 31.00 ± 5.56 for each patient. Anterior ring fixation was performed in 4 patients using an external fixator, in 5 patients using cannulated screws, and in 13 patients using reconstruction plates. The mean follow-up time was 14.46 ± 2.46 months (12–20 months). Tornetta and Matta radiographic outcomes were excellent in 10 patients, good in 9 patients, fair in 2 patients, and poor in 1 patient. The proportion of excellent and good ratings was 86.36%. At the final follow-up, the average Majeed score was 82.18 ± 14.52, with clinical outcomes that were excellent in 9 patients, good in 9 patients, fair in 1 patient, and poor in 3 patients. The proportion of excellent and good ratings was 82.82%. Preoperatively, the amplitude of the SEP on the injured side was lower than that on the contralateral side before reduction in 9 patients (>50%). In this study, no screw was mistakenly inserted into the sacral canal, and no surgical site infection occurred.

Conclusion

MNM combined with TiRobot assistance can safely implant TITS screws and can effectively identify the neurological function of patients under anesthesia and reduce iatrogenic nerve injury.

What happens at the L5/S1 facet joint when implants are placed across the sacroiliac joint?

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the posterior pelvic ring are often stabilized with fixation across the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). However, the compensatory changes at the neighboring L5/S1 facet joint are unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the compensatory change in pelvic kinematics and contact forces at the L5/S1 facet joint after fixation across the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) using a cadaveric model.

METHODS

Five fresh-frozen cadaveric pelvis specimens were dissected to remove non-structural soft tissue. Retroreflective markers were fixed to the L5 body, S1 body and bilateral anterior superior iliac spines to represent the motion of L5, S1 and the ileum, respectively. Pressure sensors were inserted in both L5/S1 facet joints. Testing was performed using a robotic system that applied load to mimic ambulation. Testing was performed prior to SIJ fixation, after unilateral SIJ fixation and bilateral fixation.

RESULTS

Contact force at the L5/S1 facet joint significantly increased by 55% from 48.4 N to 75.2 N following unilateral fixation (p = 0.0161) and increased by 100% to 96.9 N after bilateral fixation (p = 0.0038). Unilateral SIJ fixation increased flexion of the ilium relative to L5 from 1.2° to 2.0° (p = 0.01) and increased axial rotation of L5 relative to S1 from 0.7° to 1.6° (p = 0.001). Bilateral fixation increased flexion of the ilium relative to L5 to 2.0° from 1.2° prior to fixation (p = 0.001), increased axial rotation of L5 relative to S1 to 1.2° from 0.7° prior to fixation (p = 0.002) and increased flexion of L5 relative to S1 to 2.4° from 1.5° prior to fixation (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The L5/S1 facet joint experiences compensatory increased motion under increased contact force after unilateral and bilateral SIJ fixation, possibly predisposing it to adjacent segment arthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V, cadaveric study.

Outcomes and complications of the INFIX technique for unstable pelvic ring injuries with high-velocity trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The pelvic INFIX technique has been proposed as a useful alternative to symphyseal plating for management of unstable pelvic ring injuries. The minimally invasive nature of the procedure, shorter operative time and less perioperative blood loss have been purported as potential advantages.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine the outcomes and complications of the INFIX technique for unstable pelvic ring injuries.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature was performed on the PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases. Prospective and retrospective studies in all languages, whether comparative or non-comparative, pertaining to the use of INFIX in pelvic fractures were included. Studies which did not evaluate INFIX, case reports, conference abstracts and those with less than 10 cases were excluded. Cadaveric studies, technique papers and studies that did not describe the prespecified outcome measures were also excluded. Meta-analysis consisted of two different arms: a comparative arm, to compare INFIX to symphyseal plating, and a non-comparative meta-analysis arm, to determine pooled rates of outcomes and complications. Risk of bias was determined by the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) tool.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 7 were comparative and 15 were non-comparative. 746 patients were included for qualitative analysis and pooled analysis done for 589 patients. The average follow-up of these studies ranged from a minimum of 5.4 months to a maximum of 54 months. Comparative meta-analysis (n = 3 studies) of plating and INFIX showed significantly lesser blood loss (mean difference = 176.46 mL; 95% CI - 207.54 to - 145.38) and shorter operative time (mean difference = 26.43 min, 95% CI - 31.79 to - 21.07) with INFIX, but no significant difference in the overall complication rates (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.83-3.05) and functional outcome scores (mean difference = - 2.51, 95% CI - 5.73 to 0.71). Pooled analysis showed overall good radiological (mean percentage of excellent to good reduction = 91.4%, 95% CI 0.860-0.969) and functional outcomes (mean Majeed score = 86.48, 95% CI 83.34-89.61) with INFIX. The most common complications were lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury (overall rate 28%, 95% CI 15.1-41%) and heterotopic ossification (HO) (overall rate 9.4%, 95% CI 5.5-13.3%); rates of other complications were low. Significant heterogeneity was noted in the pooled analysis of blood loss, operative time, functional outcome, HO and LFCN injury. The overall strength of evidence was found to be weak.

CONCLUSION

The INFIX technique can be considered as a viable alternative to symphyseal plating for unstable pelvic ring injuries. It has the advantages of shorter operative times and less blood loss, along with comparable functional outcomes, when compared to plating. Overall, good functional outcomes can be expected. However, well-designed, multi-center randomized controlled trials are needed to conclusively prove the benefit of this technique.

Design and evaluation of an intelligent reduction robot system for the minimally invasive reduction in pelvic fractures

Introduction

Pelvic fracture is a severe high-energy injury with the highest disability and mortality of all fractures. Traditional open surgery is associated with extensive soft tissue damages and many complications. Minimally invasive surgery potentially mitigates the risks of open surgical procedures and is becoming a new standard for pelvic fracture treatment. The accurate reduction has been recognized as the cornerstone of minimally invasive surgery for pelvic fracture. At present, the closed reduction in pelvic fractures is limited by the current sub-optimal 2D intra-operative imaging (fluoroscopy) and by the high forces of soft tissue involved in the fragment manipulation, which might result in fracture malreduction. To overcome these shortcomings and facilitate pelvic fracture reduction, we developed an intelligent robot-assisted fracture reduction (RAFR) system for pelvic fracture.

Methods

The presented method is divided into three parts. The first part is the preparation of 20 pelvic fracture models. In the second part, we offer an automatic reduction algorithm of our robotic reduction system, including Intraoperative real-time 3D navigation, reduction path planning, control and fixation, and robotic-assisted fracture reduction. In the third part, image registration accuracy and fracture reduction accuracy were calculated and analyzed.

Results

All 20 pelvic fracture bone models were reduced by the RAFR system; the mean registration error E1 of the 20 models was 1.29 ± 0.57 mm. The mean reduction error E2 of the 20 models was 2.72 ± 0.82 mm. The global error analysis of registration and reduction results showed that higher errors are mainly located at the edge of the pelvis, such as the iliac wing.

Conclusion

The accuracy of image registration error and fracture reduction error in our study was excellent, which could reach the requirements of the clinical environment. Our study demonstrated the precision and effectiveness of our RAFR system and its applicability and usability in clinical practice, thus paving the way toward robot minimally invasive pelvic fracture surgeries.

Posterior hinge fixation for the treatment of unstable traumatic sacroiliac joint injuries

INTRODUCTION

Posterior hinge fixation (PHF) is a sacroiliac joint fixation method indicated for the surgical treatment of unstable pelvic ring fractures (tile C).

HYPOTHESIS

PHF yields good functional outcomes based on the Majeed score at more than 1 year of follow-up.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study of patients who had a Tile C pelvic ring fracture, who were operated by PHF and who were evaluated at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The functional outcome was determined using the Majeed score and pain was evaluated by the patients using a visual analog scale (VAS). The preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data, complications and sequelae were documented. A CT-scan was done at least 1 year after the surgical treatment to determine the SI joint's reduction and fusion.

RESULTS

Included were 22 patients (59% men) who had a mean age of 37.3±11.9 years; 21 of these patients were reviewed at a mean of 4.8±4 years. The mean Majeed score at the final assessment was 76.4 points±15.3, with 24% of patients having excellent results (n=5), 53% having good results (n=11), 19% having average results (n=4) and 5% having poor results (n=1). The mean pain level on VAS was 28±23mm. Of the eight surgical site infections, seven occurred in the PHF (88%). CT-scans taken at 1 year postoperative were compared to the preoperative scans. The pelvic opening was reduced by -9±6 (p<0.01), SI diastasis by -11mm±9 (p<0.001), vertical displacement by-7mm±8 (p<0.001), symphysis opening by -15mm±15 (p<0.001), median transverse diameter by -10mm±9 (p<0.001) and bispinal diameter by -5mm±7 (p<0.001). SI fusion was confirmed in 43% of patients (n=9).

CONCLUSION

PHF is a surgical instrumentation method that provides satisfactory long-term reduction of Tile C pelvic ring fractures. The clinical outcomes are good or excellent in 77% of cases. The perioperative morbidity is marked by surgical site infections, all of which healed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective, non-comparative cohort study.

Patients with combined pelvic and spinal injuries have worse clinical and operative outcomes than patients with isolated pelvic injuries analysis of the German Pelvic Registry

Background

Pelvic fractures are often associated with spine injury in polytrauma patients. This study aimed to determine whether concomitant spine injury influence the surgical outcome of pelvic fracture.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of data of patients registered in the German Pelvic Registry between January 2003 and December 2017. Clinical characteristics, surgical parameters, and outcomes were compared between patients with isolated pelvic fracture (group A) and patients with pelvic fracture plus spine injury (group B). We also compared apart patients with isolated acetabular fracture (group C) versus patients with acetabular fracture plus spine injury (group D).

Results

Surgery for pelvic fracture was significantly more common in group B than in group A (38.3% vs. 36.6%; p = 0.0002), as also emergency pelvic stabilizations (9.5% vs. 6.7%; p < 0.0001). The mean time to emergency stabilization was longer in group B (137 ± 106 min vs. 113 ± 97 min; p < 0.0001), as well as the mean time until definitive stabilization of the pelvic fracture (7.3 ± 4 days vs. 5.4 ± 8.0 days; p = 0.147). The mean duration of treatment and the morbidity and mortality rates were all significantly higher in group B (p < 0.0001). Operation time was significantly shorter in group C than in group D (176 ± 81 min vs. 203 ± 119 min, p < 0.0001). Intraoperative blood loss was not significantly different between the two groups with acetabular injuries. Although preoperative acetabular fracture dislocation was slightly less common in group D, postoperative fracture dislocation was slightly more common. The distribution of Matta grades was significantly different between the two groups. Patients with isolated acetabular injuries were significantly less likely to have neurological deficit at discharge (94.5%; p < 0.0001). In-hospital complications were more common in patients with combined spine plus pelvic injuries (groups B and D) than in patients with isolated pelvic and acetabular injury (groups A and C).

Conclusions

Delaying definitive surgical treatment of pelvic fractures due to spinal cord injury appears to have a negative impact on the outcome of pelvic fractures, especially on the quality of reduction of acetabular fractures.

Quantifying Urinary and Sexual Dysfunction After Pelvic Fracture

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the severity of urinary and sexual dysfunction and to evaluate the relationship between urinary and sexual dysfunction, injury, and treatment factors in patients with pelvic fracture.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

One hundred thirteen patients with surgically treated pelvic fracture (65.5% OTA/AO 61B fractures; 7 open fractures; 74 men).

INTERVENTIONS

Surgical pelvic stabilization.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire responses were collected at baseline, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 5 years. Patients were scored on symptoms of voiding and incontinence, and filling (for women), to derive urinary function. Sexual function was scored as a single domain. Both genders reported urinary and sexual bothersome symptoms. Regression analysis was used to isolate the importance of predictive factors on urinary and sexual function, urinary and sexual bother, and their impact on quality of life.

RESULTS

Patients with pelvic fracture have significant urinary and sexual dysfunction, which is sustained or worsens over time. Male urinary function was predicted by Injury Severity Score (P = 0.03) and 61C fracture (odds ratio: 3.23, P = 0.04). Female urinary function was predicted by urinary tract injury at admission (odds ratio: 7.57, P = 0.03). Neurologic injury and anterior fixation were identified as significant predictors for male sexual function and sexual bother, whereas urological injuries were important in predicting female urinary and sexual bother (P < 0.01). Sexual function (P = 0.02) and sexual bother (P < 0.001) were important predictors of overall mental well-being in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary and sexual dysfunction are prevalent and sustained in men and women and do not follow the prolonged slow recovery trajectory seen in physical function. Male urinary and sexual dysfunction was closely tied to neurologic injury, whereas female urinary and sexual dysfunction was predicted by the presence of a urinary tract injury. Urinary and sexual dysfunction were important to overall mental well-being in men.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

What's old is best again Is anterior plating best for fixation of type-C pelvic fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Type-C pelvic fractures are a rare but potentially fatal injury that often leads to poor outcomes, despite surgical fixation. Many fixation methods are used but the optimal method remains contentious, with failure and complications common. This study compared outcomes for each fixation method.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A search of studies which reported on outcomes after surgically treated type-C pelvic fractures was undertaken. Data retrieved included fixation method, length of follow up, surgical revision, and complications rates (hardware breakage, post-operative outcomes, screw mal-positioning, screw loosening, loss of reduction and infection). Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS). Pooled revision, outcome and complication rates were calculated using a quality-adjusted model in MetaXL 5.3.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies met the inclusion criteria representing 1567 patients and 7 fixation methods. The meta-analyses demonstrated high rates of 'less-than-good' outcomes for most fixation methods, with a higher rate for bilateral injuries (overall 23%; unilateral 21% v bilateral 41%). The mean pooled rate for surgical revision rate was 4%, hardware breakage 3%, screw mal-positioning 2%, screw loosening 3%, loss of reduction 5% and infection 4%. Each fixation method had different performance profiles; however, anterior plating outperformed all other fixation methods for patient outcomes, with a 'less-than-good' rate of just 7% vs the pooled mean of 23% and demonstrated at or below pooled mean rates for all complications except revision which was 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative outcomes for surgically treated type-C pelvic fractures revealed a 'less-than-good' pooled outcome rate of 23% and a revision rate of 4%. Anterior plates outperformed most other systems particularly for patient reported outcomes. Pooled revision, patient-reported outcome and complication rates for type-C pelvic fractures have not previously been reported and these data provide a benchmark for practice and future research.

Management of LC Type I (LC-1) Pelvic Injuries with Complete Sacral Fracture: Comparison of Solitary Anterior Fixation with Combined Anterior-Posterior Fixation

BACKGROUND

Management of LC-1 type pelvic injuries, particularly in patients with complete sacral fracture (LC-1 PICSF, OTA type 61-B2.1), remains controversial. Specific indications for solitary fixation remain unclear, and there is a paucity of outcomes data in comparison to combined fixation. We undertook a retrospective study in patients with LC-1 PICSFs to compare outcomes between solitary anterior fixation and combined anterior-posterior fixation.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted with enrollment from 2016 to 2018 at a single tertiary-referral center in China. Adults with operatively managed LC-1 PICSFs were enrolled. Patients with sacral displacement < 1 cm as assessed by axial CT received solitary anterior ring fixation (group A); patients with displacement ≥ 1 cm received combined fixation of both the anterior and posterior rings (group B). Reduction was confirmed by manipulation under anesthesia. Patients followed up for at least 24 months postoperatively. Primary outcome was function (Majeed score). Secondary outcomes included intraoperative characteristics, pain (VAS score), quality of fracture reduction (Tornetta and Matta radiographic grading), rate of nonunion, early weight-bearing status, and complication rate.

RESULTS

68 (89%) of 76 enrolled patients completed follow-up. Patients in group A exhibited improved operative times, less time under fluoroscopy, and less blood loss as compared to group B. There were no significant differences between groups A and B regarding quality of fracture reduction, rate of union, functional outcomes, or rate of complications. Notably, group B patients were more likely to achieve full early weight-bearing.

CONCLUSION

LC-1 PFCSFs can get benefits from ORIF; the treatment algorithm should be differently made following the degree of the sacral fractures displacement. Less than 1 cm sacral fracture displacement may get good functional outcomes from solitary anterior fixation. However, for the sacral fractures displacement greater or equal to 1 cm, both the anterior and posterior pelvic rings should be surgical stabilization.

Accuracy of Radiographic Displacement Measurement in a Pelvic Ring Injury Model

BACKGROUND

Pelvic ring injury outcome studies rely on radiographic assessment. To date, no study investigates the accuracy of radiographic measurement. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and interobserver reliability of pelvic ring displacement measurement in an injury model. We hypothesize that current radiographic measurement methods do not accurately quantify the three-dimensional pelvic ring displacement.

METHODS

Ten orthopaedic traumatologists evaluated 12 pelvic ring injury model displacements using AP, inlet, and outlet radiographs and axial CT images. Observers completed a survey of demographic and treatment approach strategies. Radiographic displacement measurements in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes were analyzed for accuracy using. Absolute displacement measurements were categorized with Matta and Tornetta grading system for Fleiss Kappa inter-reliability correlation evaluation.

RESULTS

The mean age of orthopaedic traumatologists was 47.5 years (range 36 to 59) with a mean 15.3 years (range 4 to 27) of pelvic fracture surgery experience. Radiographic measurement of isolated uniplanar of pelvic displacement in axial, sagittal, or coronal plane alone was more accurate than multiplanar pelvic displacements with more than one plane of displacement, 6.6 ± 5.7 mm error compared with 9.6 ± 6.3 mm error, respectively (P = 0.0035). Measurement accuracy was greater with isolated coronal plane (4 ± 3.5 mm error) compared with isolated axial plane (9.9 ± 7.1 mm error) or isolated sagittal plane displacement (6.7 ± 4 mm error). Interrater reliability for the radiographic displacement measurement by observers showed an overall poor agreement with 0.24.

CONCLUSION

Radiographic displacement measurement in these modeled pelvic ring injuries has notable inaccuracy among various measurement methods. Coronal and sagittal plane radiographic displacement measurements are more accurate compared with axial plane measurement. The reporting of radiographic displacement measurement outcomes in clinical research studies should be critically evaluated, and standardization of pelvic ring injury displacement may not be achievable with radiography.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Percutaneous iliosacral screw and trans-iliac trans-sacral screw with single C-arm fluoroscope intensifier is a safe treatment for pelvic ring injuries

To elucidate the accuracy, efficacy, and safety of percutaneous iliosacral screw (ISS) and trans-iliac trans-sacral screw (TITS) insertion using a single C-arm fluoroscopy intensifier. Additionally, the potential risk factors that might cause mal-positioned screws were identified. Patients with pelvic ring injuries who underwent percutaneous screw fixation in a single medical institute were divided into an ISS group (n = 59) and a TITS group (n = 62) and assessed. The angles deviated from ideal orientation (ADIO) of the implanted screw were measured, and potential risk factors for mal-positioned screws were analyzed. Overall, the reduction quality of the pelvic ring was good or excellent in 70 patients (82.4%) by Matta’s criteria and in 48 patients (56.5%) by Lefaivre’s criteria. ADIO measurements of the ISS and TITS groups via multi-planar computed tomography were 9.16° ± 6.97° and 3.09° ± 2.8° in the axial view, respectively, and 5.92° ± 3.65° and 2.10° ± 2.01° in the coronal view, respectively. Univariate statistical analysis revealed body mass index as the single potential risk factor of mal-positioned screws. With careful preoperative planning and intraoperative preparations, placing ISS and TITS under the guidance of single C-arm fluoroscopy intensifier is a reliable and safe technique. Caution should be exercised when performing this procedure in patients with a high body mass index.

Postoperative Reduction Quality May Be the Most Important Factor That Causes Worse Functional Outcomes in Open and Closed Pelvic Fractures

Background

Data on the functional outcomes of patients with open pelvic fractures after osteosynthesis are limited, and whether open fracture is a risk factor for worse outcomes, as compared with closed fracture, remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the functional outcomes of patients with open and closed pelvic fractures and evaluate potential factors that might affect outcomes.

Methods

Overall, 19 consecutive patients with open pelvic fractures and 78 patients with closed pelvic fractures between January 2014 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All fractures were surgically treated, with a minimal follow-up period of three years. Patients’ demographic profile, associated injuries, management protocol, quality of reduction, and outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

Results

Patients with open pelvic fractures had higher new injury severity score, higher incidence of diverting colostomy, and longer length of stay. Both radiological and functional evaluations revealed no significant differences between the two groups at 1-year and 3-year evaluations. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified poor radiological outcomes (using Lefaivre criteria) and longer length of stay as risk factors for worse short-term functional outcomes. At 3-year evaluation, fair-to-poor radiological outcomes (using Matta/Tornetta and Lefaivre criteria) and the presence of diverting colostomy were potential risk factors.

Conclusions

Compared with closed pelvic fracture, open pelvic fracture was not an indicator of worse functional outcomes. Functional outcomes may be comparable between patients with open and closed pelvic fractures at different time points within three years postoperatively. Achieving anatomical reduction in a fracture is crucial, because it might affect patient satisfaction.

Spinopelvic fixation for vertically unstable AO type C pelvic fractures and sacral fractures with spinopelvic dissociation- A systematic review and pooled analysis involving 479 patients

BACKGROUND

Posterior pelvic ring injuries can be fixed using iliosacral screws, plates or bars. Another promising modality is spinopelvic fixation or triangular osteosynthesis, indicated in vertical instability and sacral fractures associated with spinopelvic dissociation.

QUESTION/PURPOSE

This systematic review and pooled analysis was conducted to analyze the outcomes (functional and radiological) of the use of spinopelvic fixation, as well as assess the associated complications and neurological recovery.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature was performed from the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and the SCOPUS databases. All studies reporting on spinopelvic fixations, with a minimum follow up of 1 year were included in the review. Pooled analysis was done for the outcome and complication rates. The MINORS Tool was used for assessing the risk of bias.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies were included with average follow-up between 12 and 86.4 months. There were 7 prospective and 15 retrospective case series. The functional outcomes were excellent/good in 90% cases, across 8 studies (95% CI 84-95%); radiological outcomes were excellent/good in 97% cases (95% CI 94-100%) across 5 studies. The most commonly reported complications were hardware prominence in 21.3% (95% CI 11.6,30.9%) and infections in 7.2% cases (95% CI 4.8,9.5%). 73% of the patients reported partial or complete improvement in their neurological condition.

CONCLUSION

Spinopelvic fixation is an effective method in vertical instability of the pelvis and sacral fractures with spinopelvic dissociations, with good to excellent radiological and functional outcomes. However, adequate precautions are needed to avoid infections and wound complications.

Treatment of Unstable Posterior Pelvic Ring Injury with S2-Alar-Iliac Screw and S1 Pedicle Screw Fixation

OBJECTIVE

The S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws have been described as an alternative method for lumbosacropelvic fixation in place of iliac screws. However, the clinical effect of the short-segment S2AI screw fixation technique in the treatment of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries remains unclear. In this study, we report the preliminary clinical results of the internal fixation connecting a S2-alar-iliac screw and a S1 pedicle screw (i.e., S2AI-S1 fixation) in the treatment of unstable pelvic posterior ring injuries.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with unstable posterior pelvic ring injury were treated with S2AI-S1 fixation from February 2019 to June 2020. The incision length, surgical time, blood loss, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, quality of reduction, complications, and functional outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 29 groups of S2AI-S1 fixation were used in 25 patients. The mean incision length was 8.3 (6.2 - 10.3) cm, mean operative time was 86.4 (60 - 142) minutes, mean frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy was 7.9 (4 - 12) times, and mean blood loss was 148 (50 - 500) mL. The mean postoperative follow-up time was 17.8 (10 - 26) months. The satisfaction rate of pelvic reduction quality was 25/29, and the satisfactory rate of functional outcome was 23/25. There were no obvious signs of screw prominence, screw loosening, or implant failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The case series presented in this study show the successful use of S2AI-S1 fixation to treat unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries. The S2AI-S1 fixation, not including the lumbar spine in the fixation range, is a simple, safe, and effective fixation method.

A Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Surgical Fixation Versus Nonoperative Management of Minimally Displaced Complete Lateral Compression Pelvis Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To compare the early pain and functional outcomes of operative fixation versus nonoperative management for minimally displaced complete lateral compression (LC; OTA/AO 61-B1/B2) pelvic fractures.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial.

SETTING

Two academic trauma centers.

PATIENTS

Forty-eight adult patients with LC pelvic ring injuries with <10 mm of displacement were treated nonoperatively and 47 with surgical fixation. Sixty percent of participants were randomized. Seventy-three percent of the fractures were displaced <5 mm, and 71% were LC-1 patterns.

INTERVENTION

Operative fixation versus nonoperative management.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was patient-reported pain using the 10-point Brief Pain Inventory. Functional outcome was measured using the Majeed pelvic score. Outcomes were analyzed using hierarchical Bayesian models to compare the average treatment effect from injury to 12 and 52 weeks postinjury. The probability of the mean treatment benefit exceeding a clinically important difference was determined.

RESULTS

The 3-month average treatment effect of surgery compared with nonoperative management was a 1.2-point reduction in pain [95% credible interval (CrI): 0.4-1.9] and an 8% absolute improvement in the Majeed score (95% CrI: 3%-14%). Similar results persisted to 1 year. Patients with initial fracture displacement ≥5 mm experienced a larger reduction in pain (2.2, 95% CrI: 0.9-3.5) compared with those patients with less initial displacement (0.9, 95% CrI: 0.1-1.8).

CONCLUSION

On average, surgical fixation likely provides a small improvement in pain and functional outcome for up to 12 months. Patients with ≥5 mm of posterior pelvic ring displacement are more likely to experience clinically important improvements in pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Complications and outcomes in 69 consecutive patients with floating hip

BACKGROUND

Floating hip is a rare and potentially serious injury. The objective of this study was to evaluate our management strategy for patients with floating hip.

HYPOTHESIS

A standardized strategy with specialised multidisciplinary management is associated with a low mortality rate.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who had surgery to treat floating hip between January 2010 and December 2019 were included in this single-centre retrospective study. Epidemiological, clinical, and radiological data were collected and analysed. Patients were managed according to a standardised strategy adapted to the haemodynamic status and type of floating hip (type A, femoral and pelvic ring fractures; type B, femoral and acetabular fractures; and type C, femoral, acetabular, and pelvic ring fractures). The clinical outcome at last follow-up was determined by a telephone interview, based on the Majeed and Oxford scores, sports resumption, and work resumption. To assess the radiological outcomes, we applied Matta's criteria for the acetabulum and Tornetta's criteria for the pelvic ring.

RESULTS

We included 69 patients with a mean age of 38.5 years. Among them, 39 (57%) had haemodynamic instability requiring embolisation (n=15, 22%) or multiple blood transfusions (n=24, 35%). Type A injuries predominated (n=57, 83%). The need for multiple blood transfusions was significantly associated with type C floating hip, underlining the risk of heavy bleeding with this injury. Two (3%) patients died. When management was complete, the reduction was anatomical or satisfactory for 76% (13/17) of the acetabula according to Matta's criteria (maximum residual displacement <3mm) and for 85% (56/66) of the pelvic rings according to Tornetta's criteria (maximum residual displacement <10mm). One or more complications occurred in 45 (65%) patients. After a mean follow-up of 5 years, the mean Oxford Hip Score in patients with acetabular fractures was 35.5 and the mean Majeed score in patients with pelvic ring fractures was 71.5. Only 30% of patients were able to resume physical activities at the former level and to return to their former professional activities.

CONCLUSION

Type C floating hip, which combines fractures of the pelvic ring and acetabulum, carries a high risk of bleeding. Special attention should be directed to the reduction of pelvic ring fractures, to avoid malunion. Acetabular fractures that are complex in the Letournel classification carry a risk of imperfect reduction. The results of this study confirm the severity of these rare injuries and the need for specialised multidisciplinary management according to a standardised strategy that is appropriate for the haemodynamic status and type of floating hip (A, B, or C).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Does 3D-Assisted Operative Treatment of Pelvic Ring Injuries Improve Patient Outcome?-A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: There has been an exponential growth in the use of advanced technologies for three-dimensional (3D) virtual pre- and intra-operative planning of pelvic ring injury surgery but potential benefits remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in intra- and post-operative results between 3D and conventional (2D) surgery. Methods: A systematic review was performed including published studies between 1 January 2010 and 22 May 2020 on all available 3D techniques in pelvic ring injury surgery. Studies were assessed for their methodological quality according to the Modified McMaster Critical Review form. Differences in operation time, blood loss, fluoroscopy time, screw malposition rate, fracture reduction and functional outcome between 3D-assisted and conventional (2D) pelvic injury treatment were evaluated and a best-evidence synthesis was performed. Results: Eighteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, evaluating a total of 988 patients. Overall quality was moderate. Regarding intra-operative results of 3D-assisted versus conventional surgery: The weighted mean operation time per screw was 43 min versus 52 min; for overall operation time 126 min versus 141 min; blood loss 275 ± 197 mL versus 549 ± 404 mL; fluoroscopy time 74 s versus 125 s and fluoroscopy frequency 29 ± 4 versus 63 ± 3. In terms of post-operative outcomes of 3D-assisted versus conventional surgery: weighted mean screw malposition rate was 8% versus 18%; quality of fracture reduction measured by the total excellent/good rate by Matta was 86% versus 82% and Majeed excellent/good rate 88% versus 83%. Conclusion: The 3D-assisted surgery technologies seem to have a positive effect on operation time, blood loss, fluoroscopy dose, time and frequency as well as accuracy of screw placement. No improvement in clinical outcome in terms of fracture reduction and functional outcome has been established so far. Due to a wide range of methodological quality and heterogeneity between the included studies, results should be interpreted with caution.

Unilateral lumbopelvic fixation for AO/OTA Type C1 and C2 pelvic fractures: Clinical efficacy and preliminary experiences in 23 patients

PURPOSE

To report the clinical outcomes and preliminary experiences of unilateral lumbopelvic fixation for patients with AO/OTA Type C1 and C2 pelvic fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 2014 and Dec 2017, 23 consecutive patients with AO/OTA Type C1 and C2 pelvic factures were treated by unilateral lumbopelvic fixation. Estimated blood loss, operation duration, reduction quality, functional outcomes using Majeed scores and complications were evaluated. Subgroup analysis was used to assess the influence of unilateral lumbopelvic fixation on different type of pelvic fractures.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with Type C1 pelvic fractures and eight patients with Type C2 fractures underwent unilateral lumbopelvic fixation respectively. The mean follow-up time till May 2019 was 34.3 ± 9.9 months (range 17-60 months). Mean estimated blood loss was 473 ml and mean operation duration was 156 min during unilateral lumbopelvic fixation. The mean vertical displacement of pelvis decreased from 10.1 ± 4.9 mm to 3.1 ± 1.9 mm after unilateral lumbopelvic fixation. Majeed score assessments were available for 22 patients. Of these, 13 patients were graded as excellent, 8 were good and one was fair. The results of subgroup analysis showed that there was no difference of estimated blood loss, operation duration, postoperative displacements of pelvis and Majeed scores between the patients with Type C1 and C2 fractures.

CONCLUSION

Unilateral lumbopelvic fixation could provide a well reduction quality and was an effective treatment for AO/OTA Type C1 and C2 pelvic fractures.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective evaluation of 23 consecutive patients with AO/OTA Type C1 and C2 pelvic fractures treated by unilateral lumbopelvic fixation.