Controlled study of the use of autologous serum in dry eye patients

Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of autologous serum eye drops in dry eye syndrome

BACKGROUND

Autologous serum eye drops (ASEDs), a novel treatment derived from blood serum, have emerged as a groundbreaking solution for managing dry eye syndrome (DES). These drops have shown significant promise in relieving the distressing symptoms of DES. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ASEDs compared to traditional treatments, which often prove inadequate or result in unwanted side effects, particularly in individuals with moderate-to-severe DES.

AIM

To evaluate whether ASEDs are safer and more effective than conventional artificial tears in the treatment of moderate-to-severe DES.

METHODS

This multi-centered randomized controlled trial included 240 patients with moderate-to-severe DES from three ophthalmology clinics in China. They were randomly assigned to receive either ASEDs or artificial tears for 12 wk. The primary outcome was the change in the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, with secondary outcomes including tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer I test, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), and conjunctival impression cytology (CIC). Statistics analysis was performed using an analysis of covariance with adjustments made for baseline values.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed that both ASEDs and artificial tears significantly improved the OSDI score, TBUT, Schirmer I test, CFS, and CIC from baseline to week 12. The ASEDs group showed significantly greater improvement in all these measures than the artificial tears group (all P values < 0.05). The average difference in the OSDI score between the two cohorts was -10.3 (95% confidence interval: -13.6 to -7.0), indicating a substantial improvement in the ASEDs group. The occurrence of adverse events was comparable between cohorts, with no reports of severe adverse events.

CONCLUSION

ASEDs are more effective and safer than artificial tears for mitigating symptoms of moderate-to-severe DES. ASEDs could be an alternative/supplementary therapy for patients with DES less responsive to traditional treatments.

Autologous Serum Eye Drops for Dry Eye: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Dry eye is a common condition with serious implications worldwide. The unique composition of autologous serum (AS) eye drops has been hypothesized as a possible treatment.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to review the effectiveness and safety of AS.

DATA SOURCES

We searched five databases and three registries up to September 30, 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AS with artificial tears, saline, or placebo for participants with dry eye.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

We adhered to Cochrane methods for study selection, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment, and synthesis. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to evaluate the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

We included six RCTs with 116 participants. Four trials compared AS with artificial tears. We found low-certainty evidence that AS may improve symptoms (0- to 100-point pain scale) after 2 weeks of treatment compared with saline (mean difference, -12.00; 95% confidence interval, -20.16 to -3.84; 1 RCT, 20 participants). Ocular surface outcomes (corneal staining, conjunctival staining, tear breakup time, Schirmer test) were inconclusive. Two trials compared AS with saline. Very low-certainty evidence suggested that Rose Bengal staining (0- to 9-point scale) may be slightly improved after 4 weeks of treatment compared with saline (mean difference, -0.60; 95% confidence interval, -1.11 to -0.09; 35 eyes). None of the trials reported outcomes of corneal topography, conjunctival biopsy, quality of life, economic outcomes, or adverse events.

LIMITATIONS

We were unable to use all data because of unclear reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of AS is uncertain based on current data. Symptoms improved slightly with AS compared with artificial tears for 2 weeks. Staining scores improved slightly with AS compared with saline, with no benefit identified for other measures.

IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

High-quality, large trials enrolling diverse participants with varying severity are needed. A core outcome set would allow for evidence-based treatment decisions consistent with current knowledge and patient values.

Combination of Bandage Contact Lens and Autologous Serum Eye Drop for the Treatment of Superior Limbic Keratoconjunctivitis

PURPOSE

To report clinical improvement after combined treatment of bandage contact lens and autologous serum eye drop in a patient with superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis (SLK) complicated with dry eye disease (DED) and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Case report.

RESULTS

A 60-year-old woman was referred for unilateral chronic recurrent redness of the left eye not responding to topical steroids and cyclosporine 0.1% eye drop. She was diagnosed with SLK, which was complicated by the presence of DED and MGD. The patient was then commenced with autologous serum eye drop and fitted with silicone hydrogel contact lens in her left eye, and treated with intense pulsed light therapy for MGD in both eyes. Remission was seen Information Classification: General serum eye drop and bandage contact lens wear.

CONCLUSION

Long-term application of autologous serum eye drop combined with bandage contact lens can be used as an alternative treatment approach in SLK.

Autologous Platelet and Extracellular Vesicle-Rich Plasma as Therapeutic Fluid: A Review

The preparation of autologous platelet and extracellular vesicle-rich plasma (PVRP) has been explored in many medical fields with the aim to benefit from its healing potential. In parallel, efforts are being invested to understand the function and dynamics of PVRP that is complex in its composition and interactions. Some clinical evidence reveals beneficial effects of PVRP, while some report that there were no effects. To optimize the preparation methods, functions and mechanisms of PVRP, its constituents should be better understood. With the intention to promote further studies of autologous therapeutic PVRP, we performed a review on some topics regarding PVRP composition, harvesting, assessment and preservation, and also on clinical experience following PVRP application in humans and animals. Besides the acknowledged actions of platelets, leukocytes and different molecules, we focus on extracellular vesicles that were found abundant in PVRP.

Autologous Serum Eye Drops in the Management of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency Associated With Glaucoma Surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety and efficacy of autologous serum eye drops (AS) in the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) associated with glaucoma surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of eyes with glaucoma surgery-induced LSCD treated with AS. Diagnosis of LSCD was confirmed by anterior segment optical coherence tomography, in vivo confocal microscopy, and/or impression cytology. Limbal stem cell deficiency severity was staged using a clinical scoring system (2-10 points). Outcome measures were changes (≥2 points) of the LSCD score and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from the baseline to the last follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirteen eyes of 12 consecutive patients treated with 50% AS for at least 3 months were included. The mean age was 78.9±7.5 years and the mean duration of AS use was 20.9±16.8 months. Indications of AS included LSCD progression in eight eyes (61.5%) and visual axis threatening in five eyes (38.5%). The mean LSCD score at baseline (6.7±1.6) was similar to that at last follow-up (6.5±2.2, P =0.625). Two eyes (15.4%) showed improvement, nine eyes (69.2%) were stable, and two eyes (15.4%) worsened. The mean baseline BCVA (0.89±0.64 logMAR) was similar to the mean final BCVA (1.05±0.63 logMAR, P =0.173). There were no serious adverse complications related to AS.

CONCLUSION

AS appears to be well tolerated and may stabilize the progression of LSCD with limited effects. A larger study is necessary to confirm the findings.

Ocular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article summarizes the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis and common ocular manifestations that it is associated with: keratoconjunctivitis sicca, episcleritis, scleritis, and peripheral ulcerative keratitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newer biologic agents are being used to effectively treat rheumatoid arthritis and its ocular manifestations.

SUMMARY

The eye is a frequent extra-articular site of inflammation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ocular involvement can range from more benign conditions such as keratoconjunctivitis sicca and episcleritis, to potentially vision and globe-threatening diseases like scleritis and peripheral ulcerative keratitis. Clinicians should be aware of these ophthalmic manifestations and the various treatment options that are available. Coordination between ophthalmology and rheumatology is helpful in the treatment of these patients.

Autologous serum eye drops for ocular surface disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ocular surface disease is a prevalent, diverse group of conditions that cause patient discomfort and decreased visual acuity and present considerable expense to both patients and healthcare systems. Autologous serum eye drops are a topical treatment modality derived from the patient's own blood. Use of serum eye drops for ocular surface disease has been promising due to biochemical similarities to endogenous tears.

RECENT FINDINGS

Use of serum eye drops for moderate to severe ocular surface diseases such as dry eye, corneal epithelial defects, and inflammatory conditions has become more prevalent. Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of serum eye drops is well-tolerated by patients and associated with improvement in patient-reported outcomes and objective dry eye parameters. Production of serum eye drops may vary, treatment costs can be significant, and the quality of evidence for serum eye drop use published from randomized controlled trials is modest, particularly for long-term treatment. Accessibility remains an area for improvement and may be complemented by allogeneic serum eye drops.

SUMMARY

Serum eye drops are frequently used as a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment for ocular surface disease. Further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes and improve accessibility.

Topical Umbilical Cord Serum for Corneal Epithelial Defects after Diabetic Vitrectomy

Purpose

To evaluate the role of topical umbilical cord serum (TUCS) therapy in treating corneal epithelial defects (CEDs) after diabetic vitrectomy.

Methods

In this double-masked, randomized clinical trial, we included 80 eyes of 80 patients who were candidates for vitrectomy due to proliferative diabetic retinopathy complications. In cases of corneal edema obscuring the fundus view during surgery, the corneal epithelium was removed using a 6-mm trephine and a blade no.15. The day after the surgery, patients were randomly divided into two groups: (1) the TUCS group that received 20% TUCS six times/day in addition to the conventional treatment of CED and (2) the control group, which was prescribed artificial tears as placebo in addition to the conventional treatment of CED. The rate of healing of CEDs was measured via two maximum linear dimensions perpendicular to each other at the start of therapy and on postoperative days 1-5, 7, and 12.

Results

Of 80 eyes, 40 were assigned to each treatment group. The mean times to complete CED healing were 2.4 ± 0.7 and 3.8 ± 2.1 days in the TUCS and control groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Persistent CED occurred in two eyes in the control group but in no eyes in the TUCS group.

Conclusion

TUCS therapy may be safe and effective in healing CEDs after vitrectomy in patients with diabetes.

The Role of Multisystem Disease in Composition of Autologous Serum tears and ocular surface symptom improvement

PURPOSE

Autologous serum tears (AST) contain growth factors and vitamins similar to those in healthy tears and are an effective treatment option for ocular surface disease. This study determined the differences in composition of AST in patients with systemic diseases versus patients with localized ocular surface diseases and the effects on ocular surface symptom improvement.

METHOD

An observational study was performed on 53 patients with either systemic diseases (Group I) or localized ocular surface diseases (Group II) who were prescribed AST. Concentrations of epidermal growth factor (EGF), interleukin 8 (IL-8), fibronectin, vitamin A, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were determined through ELISA assays from patients in both groups. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores were calculated prior to and 6 weeks after initiation of treatment with AST for new patients.

RESULTS

The average concentration of EGF in Group I (29.39 pg/ml ± 52.85 pg/ml) was significantly lower than in Group II (88.04 pg/ml ±113.75 pg/ml) (p < 0.05). Levels of fibronectin, IL-8, and vitamin A were similar in both groups. There was a 24% reduction in OSDI score 6 weeks after initiation in Group I compared to a 36% reduction reported in Group II (p = 0.065). The OSDI score was reduced significantly after the treatment in all subjects (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Serum tears are a promising therapy for management of ocular surface disease and associated symptoms. The differences between levels of EGF in patients with localized ocular surface disease and systemic inflammatory disease may account for differences in therapeutic outcome.

Autologous Serum Eye Drops versus Artificial Tear Drops for Dry Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of autologous serum (AS) eye drops and artificial tears (AT) in dry eye disease (DED).

METHODS

Five databases (PubMed, Science Direct, the Cochrane Library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Wanfang Database) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Efficacy was evaluated in terms of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Schirmer I test, tear break-up time (TBUT), and fluorescein and rose bengal staining of ocular surface. The estimated effects of AS or AT were expressed as a proportion with the 95% confidence interval and plotted on a forest plot.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs with 267 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. For most of the studies, subjects' age was around 50 years old, and the mostly treatment duration was within 8 weeks. The follow-up results showed that the OSDI after AS treatment was lower than that after the AT treatment: the mean difference (MD) was -10.75 (95% CI, -18.12; -3.39) points. There was no difference on the Schirmer I test after treatment between the two groups: the MD was 1.68 (95% CI, -0.65; 4.00) mm. The TBUT of the AS group was longer than that of the AT group, with an MD of 4.53 (95% CI, 2.02; 7.05) s. There was no statistically significant difference on fluorescein staining score of the ocular surface between the AS group and the AT group, the MD was -2.53 (95% CI, -6.08; 1.03) points. The rose bengal staining score of the AS group was slightly lower than that of the AT group after treatment: the MD was -0.78 (95% CI, -1.34; -0.22) points.

CONCLUSION

AS could be an effective treatment for DED, improving OSDI, TBUT, and rose bengal staining score. Further RCTs with large samples and long-term follow-up are still needed to determine the exact role of AS in the management of DED.

Serum eye drops for the treatment of ocular surface diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of blood-derived eye drops for topical treatment of ocular surface diseases has progressively increased in recent years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To evaluate the use of serum eye drops in ocular surface disorders, we performed a systematic search of the literature.

RESULTS

In this systematic review, we included 19 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of serum eye drops in 729 patients compared to controls. For the quantitative synthesis, we included only 10 RCTs conducted in patients with dry eye syndrome comparing autologous serum to artificial tears. At 2-6 weeks, no clear between-group differences in Schirmer test (MD 1.05; 95% CI: -0.17-2.26) and in fluorescein staining (MD -0.61; 95% CI: -1.50-0.28) were found (very low-quality evidence, down-graded for inconsistency, serious risk of biases, and serious imprecision). Slightly higher increase in tear film break-up time (TBUT) scores in autologous serum compared to control (MD 2.68; 95% CI: 1.33-4.03), and greater decrease in ocular surface disease index (OSDI) in autologous serum compared to control (MD -11.17; 95% CI: -16.58 - -5.77) were found (low quality evidence, down-graded for serious risk of bias, and for inconsistency). For the Schirmer test, fluorescein staining and TBUT, data were also available at additional follow-up timing (2-12 months): no clear between-group differences were found, and the quality of the evidence was graded as low/very-low.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with dry eye syndrome, it is unclear whether or not the use of autologous serum compared to artificial tears increases Schirmer test and fluorescein staining scores at short-term and medium-/long-term follow up. Some benefit at short-term follow up for the outcome of TBUT and OSDI was observed, but the quality of the evidence was low.

The use of autologous serum eye drops for the treatment of ocular surface disorders

Objectives

To investigate the use of autologous serum (AS) eye drops in patients with ocular surface disorders who were refractory to conventional treatments.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care centre. We included patients with a prescription of AS eye drops from December 2006 to January 2016. Electronic prescriptions (Prescriplant) and clinical histories were reviewed. A database with sociodemographic and pharmacotherapheutic variables was created. The efficacy was evaluated subjectively and adverse effects was a measurement of safety. AS eye drops were elaborated, in a laminar flow hood, with the blood samples for a final concentration of 20%.

Results

One hundred and seventy-three patients were considered for the study, 78.03% of them female. Their mean age was 63.87 years (SD 16.69). The use of AS eye drops was indicated for several diseases: corneal diseases (corneal ulcer or corneal persistent epithelial defects) (34.32%); Sjögren syndrome (17.16%); dry eye resulting from autoimmune disease (15.38%); and blepharitis/blepharospasm (12.43%). The regular dosage was every 3 or 4 hours (40.46%). 21.97% patients used the AS in one eye only. The mean length of treatment was 2.71 years. All patients, except one, improved their symptoms with the treatment and no one suffered harmful effects.

Conclusions

Numerous national and international guidelines on dry eye treatment have been published, but they differ in dosing, concentration and indication of AS eye drops. Consequently, there is no consensus about the best therapy with AS. In this article we describe the clinical practice of AS eye drops. In the study, indications for AS therapy were mostly: corneal diseases; Sjögren syndrome; and dry eye resulting from autoimmune disease; and blepharitis or blepharospasm. Patients went to the hospital pharmacy to pick up AS eye drops before 90 days, it ensures the stability of eye drops. AS is an effective, safe and well tolerated treatment.

Blood-Based Treatments for Severe Dry Eye Disease: The Need of a Consensus

The use of blood-based eye drops as therapy for various diseases of the ocular surface has become increasingly popular in ophthalmic practice during recent years. The rationale for their use is based on the promotion of cellular proliferation and migration thanks to the supply of metabolically active substances, in particular growth factors. Blood-derived eye drops have been used for the treatment of several ocular surface disorders, such as dry eye disease, corneal ulcer, persistent epithelial defect, neurotrophic keratitis, ocular surface burn, recurrent corneal erosion, and limbal stem-cell deficiency. Both autologous (from patients themselves) and heterologous (from adult donors or from cord blood sampled at birth)-derived products exist, and each source has specific pros and cons. Despite an extensive literature, several issues are still under debate and the aim of this manuscript is to review the indications, preparation methods and storage, characterization of content, rationale for clinical outcomes, patient stratification, length of treatment, and rationale for repeated treatments at disease relapse. A rationale based on a "5 Ws and 2 Hs" protocol is proposed as a way of thinking, with the attempt to clarify Who, Why, When, Where, What, and How to use these treatment options.

Hyaluronic Acid as an Alternative to Autologous Human Serum Eye Drops: Initial Clinical Results with High-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronic Acid Eye Drops

Introduction

Autologous serum eye drops (ASED) are used in the treatment of most severe stages of dry eye. Once introduced, it is currently considered impossible to return to other lubricating eye drops or other commercially available therapeutic regimen.

Materials and Methods

In a randomized study, non-preserved high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid eye drops were offered as an alternative to 11 patients using autologous serum treatment for at least 3 months. The control group (n = 5) continued their treatment with ASED. The verum group (n = 6) used very-high-molecular-weight hyaluronic eye drops (Comfort Shield®) instead of the ASED.

Results

From four of initially six patients in the verum group that finished the study, 2 (50%) preferred to stay with the very-high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid eye drops beyond the trial period, the other two returned to the earlier therapy with ASED. The control group continued their treatment as before and finished the study after 8 weeks.

Conclusion

For the first time, artificial eye drops, i.e., high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid eye drops, offered an acceptable alternative to ASED. Some patients perceived these drops as even better than the patient's own serum. This is the first evidence that optimization of the molecular structure of hyaluronic acid can be used to create eye drops that are perceived to be better than other tested tear substitutes and even patients' own serum. This offers a new treatment perspective for patients with very severe dry eye disease.

Efficacy and safety of treatment of hyposecretory dry eye with platelet-rich plasma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the symptomatology and clinical findings in hyposecretory dry eye of the treatment with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and artificial tears of sodium hyaluronate (SH).

METHODS

Blind single-centre prospective comparative randomized study including 83 patients with hyposecretory dry eye and mean age of 64.0 years. Two groups were differentiated depending on the treatment applied: 44 patients treated with PRP (PRP group), and 39 patients treated with artificial tears of SH (SH group). Changes in Schimer test, tear osmolarity, corneal and conjunctival staining, tear film break-up time (TF-BUT), conjunctival hyperaemia, dry eye-related symptoms with the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, and caliciform cell density were evaluated during 30 days of treatment.

RESULTS

Significantly larger reduction in symptomatology (p < 0.001), visual improvement (p < 0.001), reduction in hyperaemia (p < 0.001), and corneal and conjunctival staining (p < 0.001), increment of Schirmer test outcome (p ≤ 0.005), and reduction of osmolarity were found in the PRP group in both eyes compared to SH group at 15 and 30 days of treatment. Likewise, a significantly higher increment of caliciform cell density (p < 0.001) was found in the PRP group. Strong and statistically significant correlations were found in the PRP group of the change achieved in visual acuity, hyperaemia, osmolarity, and conjunctival and corneal staining with the baseline values of these variables (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PRP treatment in hyposecretory dry eye induces a more significant positive effect over symptomatology and different dry eye signs than SH, especially in moderate and severe cases.

[Autologous serum tears: Long-term treatment in dry eye syndrome]

INTRODUCTION

Dry eye disease is a multifactorial pathology of the ocular surface. The high incidence of this pathology, as well as its significant impact on quality of life and vision and its financial cost, makes it a real public health problem. While the treatment of mild cases is generally simple and effective, treatment of severe forms is often disappointing. The use of autologous serum tears (AST) represents a therapeutic alternative for the most severe cases. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of long-term AST treatment in patients with severe dry eye disease refractory to conventional treatment or secondary to systemic diseases such as Sjögren's syndrome or Graft versus Host disease (GVH), or ocular pathologies such as neurotrophic keratitis, chemical burns and ocular cicatricial pemphigoid.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a monocentric retrospective observational study conducted on 47 patients, with 83 eyes treated with autologous serum eye drops for isolated or secondary dry eye disease at the Marseille Public Hospitals between April 2014 and April 2017. The patients' subjective symptoms (ocular surface disease index [OSDI] score), their degree of satisfaction and the side effects were collected using questionnaires. Tear Break Up Time (BUT) and Schirmer scores were noted. A clinical evaluation based on fluorescein staining (Oxford score) was carried out prior to treatment with AST at P0 followed by 5 periods: P1 (between 1 and 3 months), P2 (3 to 9 months), P3 (9 to 15 months), P4 (15 months to 24 months), and P5 (>24 months).

RESULTS

Out of the 83 eyes treated, the mean age was 54.39±21.56. There were 20 males (42.55 %) and 27 females (57.44 %); treatment indications consisted mainly of 25.53 % GVH, 21.27 % severe dry eye disease and 19.14 % Sjögren syndrome. The mean duration of follow-up was 9.82 months±15.50. The OSDI score decreased by 19.32 points±29.37 (P<0.05) between P0 and P1 and by 23.06 points±18.41 (P<0.05) between P0 and P4. The Oxford clinical score showed a significant decrease by the third month of treatment, between P0 and P2, by 1.32 points±1.76 (P<0.05). The Schirmer test and the BUT also showed an improvement in dry eye symptoms over time with AST, significantly at P1 (P<0.05).

DISCUSSION

Complementary biological analyzes on the composition of AST are under way in order to identify predictive factors of effectiveness; patients not responding to AST treatment might respond to allogeneic serum from healthy donor cord blood.

CONCLUSION

On this first series of 83 eyes treated with ASD, clinical efficacy was noted in most of the patients. No infectious complications were reported, and the satisfaction rate was very high.

Treatment of Dry Eye Disease with Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Prospective, Interventional, Non-Randomized Study

Introduction

The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) eye drops as monotherapy for the treatment of moderate to severe cases of dry eye disease.

Methods

Three hundred and sixty-eight patients with moderate to severe dry eye disease (DED) were included in this prospective case series. Subjects were classified as evaporative DED (EDED) or aqueous deficient DED (ADDED). Improvement of the DED subjective symptoms, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), and corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) were evaluated. We also analysed how many rounds of PRP therapy were used.

Results

Two hundred and ninety-seven (80.7%) patients were women, and 71 (19.3%) were men. Two hundred and thirty-two (63%) patients had EDED, while 136 (37%) had ADDED. After 6 weeks of monotherapy treatment with autologous PRP, dry eye symptoms improved in 322 (87.5%) cases. A decrease of CFS was observed in 280 (76.1%) patients. One hundred and six (28.8%) patients improved at least 1 line of BCVA. The scores in the ocular Surface Disease Index and the Oxford scale of corneal fluorescein staining decreased statistically after the treatment (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The topical use of autologous platelet-rich plasma as monotherapy is an effective treatment to improve signs and symptoms in patients suffering from moderate to severe chronic DED.

Fingerprick autologous blood: a novel treatment for dry eye syndrome

PurposeDry eye syndrome (DES) causes significant morbidity. Trials of blood-derived products in treatment of the condition show promising results. However, their production is expensive and time-consuming. We investigate fingerprick autologous blood (FAB) as an alternative low-cost, readily accessible treatment for DES.Patients and methodsProspective, non-comparative, interventional case series. In total, 29 eyes of 16 DES patients (2 males and 14 females) from two NHS sites in the United Kingdom. Patients instructed to clean a finger, prick with a blood lancet, and apply a drop of blood to the lower fornix of the affected eye(s), 4 times daily for 8 weeks then stop and review 4 weeks later. Follow-up visits occurred ~3 days, 2, 4, 8 weeks into therapy, and 4 weeks post-cessation. At each visit, visual acuity, corneal staining, Schirmer's test, tear break-up time (TBUT), and ocular comfort index (OCI) were measured, and photographs taken. Results were analysed using Student's paired t-test.ResultsAt 8 weeks, there was improvement in mean Oxford corneal staining grade (3.31 to 2.07 (P<0.0001)), TBUT (5.00 to 7.80 s (P<0.05)), visual acuity (0.08 to 0.01 LogMAR equivalent (P<0.05)), and OCI score (56.03 to 39.72 (P<0.0001)). There was no statistically significant change in Schirmer's test results. Four weeks post-cessation versus immediately after completion of FAB therapy, mean staining grade worsened from 2.07 to 2.86 (P<0.0001). OCI score worsened from 39.72 to 44.67 (P<0.05).ConclusionsIn our limited case series FAB appears to be a safe and effective treatment for DES.

Autologous serum eye drops for dry eye

BACKGROUND

Theoretically, autologous serum eye drops (AS) offer a potential advantage over traditional therapies on the assumption that AS not only serve as a lacrimal substitute to provide lubrication but contain other biochemical components that allow them to mimic natural tears more closely. Application of AS has gained popularity as second-line therapy for patients with dry eye. Published studies on this subject indicate that autologous serum could be an effective treatment for dry eye.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted this review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AS given alone or in combination with artificial tears as compared with artificial tears alone, saline, placebo, or no treatment for adults with dry eye.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2016, Issue 5), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to July 2016), Embase (January 1980 to July 2016), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to July 2016), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We also searched the Science Citation Index Expanded database (December 2016) and reference lists of included studies. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 5 July 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared AS versus artificial tears for treatment of adults with dry eye.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened all titles and abstracts and assessed full-text reports of potentially eligible trials. Two review authors extracted data and assessed risk of bias and characteristics of included trials. We contacted investigators to ask for missing data. For both primary and secondary outcomes, we reported mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous outcomes. We did not perform meta-analysis owing to differences in outcome assessments across trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified five eligible RCTs (92 participants) that compared AS versus artificial tears or saline in individuals with dry eye of various origins (Sjögren's syndrome-related dry eye, non-Sjögren's syndrome dry eye, and postoperative dry eye induced by laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)). We assessed the certainty of evidence as low or very low because of lack of reporting of quantitative data for most outcomes and unclear or high risk of bias among trials. We judged most risk of bias domains to have unclear risk in two trials owing to insufficient reporting of trial characteristics, and we considered one trial to have high risk of bias for most domains. We judged the remaining two trials to have low risk of bias; however, these trials used a cross-over design and did not report data in a way that could be used to compare outcomes between treatment groups appropriately. Incomplete outcome reporting and heterogeneity among outcomes and follow-up periods prevented inclusion of these trials in a summary meta-analysis.Three trials compared AS with artificial tears; however, only one trial reported quantitative data for analysis. Low-certainty evidence from one trial suggested that AS might provide some improvement in participant-reported symptoms compared with artificial tears after two weeks of treatment; the mean difference in mean change in symptom score measured on a visual analogue scale (range 0 to 100, with higher scores representing worse symptoms) was -12.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) -20.16 to -3.84; 20 participants). This same trial found mixed results with respect to ocular surface outcomes; the mean difference in mean change in scores between AS and artificial tears was -0.9 (95% CI -1.47 to -0.33; 20 participants; low-certainty evidence) for fluorescein staining and -2.2 (95% CI -2.73 to -1.67; 20 participants; low-certainty evidence) for Rose Bengal staining. Both staining scales range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating worse results. The mean change in tear film break-up time was 2.00 seconds longer (95% CI 0.99 to 3.01; 20 participants; low-certainty evidence) in the AS group than in the artificial tears group. Investigators reported no clinically meaningful differences in Schirmer's test scores between groups (mean difference -0.40 mm, 95% CI -2.91 to 2.11; 20 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of these three trials reported tear hyperosmolarity and adverse events.Two trials compared AS versus saline; however, only one trial reported quantitative data for analysis of only one outcome (Rose Bengal staining). Trial investigators of the two studies reported no differences in symptom scores, fluorescein staining scores, tear film break-up times, or Schirmer's test scores between groups at two to four weeks' follow-up. Very low-certainty evidence from one trial suggested that AS might provide some improvement in Rose Bengal staining scores compared with saline after four weeks of treatment; the mean difference in Rose Bengal staining score (range from 0 to 9, with higher scores showing worse results) was -0.60 (95% CI -1.11 to -0.09; 35 participants). Neither trial reported tear hyperosmolarity outcomes. One trial reported adverse events; two of 12 participants had signs of conjunctivitis with negative culture that did resolve.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, investigators reported inconsistency in possible benefits of AS for improving participant-reported symptoms and other objective clinical measures. There might be some benefit in symptoms with AS compared with artificial tears in the short-term, but we found no evidence of an effect after two weeks of treatment. Well-planned, large, high-quality RCTs are warranted to examine participants with dry eye of different severities by using standardized questionnaires to measure participant-reported outcomes, as well as objective clinical tests and objective biomarkers to assess the benefit of AS therapy for dry eye.

Comparison of Autologous Serum Versus Preservative Free Artificial Tear in Patients with Dry Eyes Due to Systemic Isotretinoin Therapy

PURPOSE

To investigate dry eye development in the patients receiving systemic retinoic acid therapy and to compare effectiveness of Autologous Serum (AS) and preservative free artificial tear (PFAT) in the patients with dry eye disease.

METHOD

This prospective, crossover, double blind study was conducted on patients who have dry eyes due to systemic isotretinoin treatment for different indications. Patients detected as having dry eye during systemic isotretinoin treatment were included to our study. At baseline, 1 and 2 month of study, detailed ocular examination, best corrected visual acuity measurement, intraocular pressure measurement, and Tear Break-up Time (TBUT) and Schirmer Test (ST) without topical anesthesia were performed. We compared the efficacy of AS and PFAT. To accomplish crossover after the first month, treatment given to each patient was switched to the other treatment. Statistical analysis was measured using SPSS version 20.0. p values of < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

RESULT

At the end of the first month, there was a significant improvement for the TBUT test in both AS and PFAT groups compared to baseline (respectively p < 0.001, p < 0.001). TBUT was found to be significantly higher in the AS group compared to the PFAT group at the end of the first month (p < 0.001). At the end of the second month, TBUT was found to be significantly higher in the AS group compared to the PFAT group at the posttreatment time (p < 0.001). There was a significant OSDI score decreasing in both groups compared to that reported previously at the end of the first and second months (respectively p < 0.001, p < 0.001). OSDI score decreasing was more significant in the AS group compared to the PFAT group at both time points (respectively p < 0.001, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

AS may be an effective alternative to PFAT in the treatment of dry eye developed during isotretinoin use.

Current and Upcoming Therapies for Ocular Surface Chemical Injuries

Chemical injuries frequently result in vision loss, disfigurement, and challenging ocular surface complications. Acute interventions are directed at decreasing the extent of the injury, suppressing inflammation, and promoting ocular surface re-epithelialization. Chronically, management involves controlling inflammation along with rehabilitation and reconstruction of the ocular surface. Future therapies aimed at inhibiting neovascularization and promoting ocular surface regeneration should provide more effective treatment options for the management of ocular chemical injuries.

Current Approach to Dry Eye Disease

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease of the tears and ocular surface that causes tear film instability with potential damage to the ocular surface. The prevalence of dry eye in the world population ranges from 6 to 34 %. It is more common in those aged over 50, and affects mainly women. Since the introduction of the Schirmer's test in 1903, other tests have been developed to evaluate dry eye, such as biomicroscopy, the tear film breakup time (BUT), vital dyes (lissamine green and rose bengal), fluorescein, leaf fern test, corneal sensitivity test, conjunctiva impression cytology, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and tear osmolarity measurement. Although there is no gold standard, it is advisable to combine at least two tests. Strategies for treating DED have recently been modified and include patient education, tear substitute, corticosteroids, secretagogues, fatty acids, immunomodulators, occlusion of lacrimal puncta surgery and, tarsorrhaphy. Biological therapy and new topical immunomodulators such as tacrolimus, tofacitinib and IL-1 receptor inhibitor are being tested. In this review, the evaluation tests for dry eye are compared and the main studies on treatment are presented, with emphasis on studies in patients with Sjögren's syndrome. The authors propose an approach for the management of dry eye.

A Case-Control Study on the Oxidative Balance of 50% Autologous Serum Eye Drops

Importance. Autologous serum (AS) eye drops are recommended for severe dry eye in patients with ocular surface disease. No description of the antioxidant balance of AS eye drops has been reported in the literature. Objective. This study sought to evaluate the total reactive antioxidant potential (TRAP) and concentration of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in samples of 50% AS eye drops and their correlations with the demographic characteristics and lifestyle habits of patients with ocular surface disease and healthy controls. Design. This was a case-control study with a 3-month follow-up period. Participants. 16 patients with severe dry eye disease of different etiologies and 17 healthy controls matched by age, gender, and race were included. Results. TRAP and ROS were detected at all evaluated times. There were no differences in the mean ROS (p = 0.429) or TRAP (p = 0.475) levels between cases and controls. No statistically significant differences in the concentrations of ROS or TRAPs were found at 0, 15, or 30 days (p for ROS = 0.087 and p for TRAP = 0.93). Neither the demographic characteristics nor the lifestyle habits were correlated with the oxidative balance of the 50% AS eye drops. Conclusions and Relevance. Both fresh and frozen 50% AS eye drops present antioxidant capacities and ROS in an apparently stable balance. Moreover, patients with ocular surface disease and normal controls produce equivalent AS eye drops in terms of oxidative properties.

Safety and efficacy of autologous serum eye drop for treatment of dry eyes in graft-versus-host disease

PURPOSE

To evaluate the treatment of autologous serum eye drops (ASED) on dry eyes in patients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 35 patients with a history of ocular GVHD following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation that used ASED to alleviate dry eye symptoms was performed. Patients were categorized into three different groups. If patients had available ophthalmic data before and after starting treatment was group 1 (n = 14), had available ophthalmic data after starting treatment in group 2 (n = 10) and had available ophthalmic data before treatment or did not have any data after starting treatment in group 3 (n = 11). Data were collected on patient's age, gender, primary diagnosis, visual acuity and fluorescein corneal staining were collected on individual eyes in order to evaluate the efficacy of the ASED on alleviating dry eye-related signs and symptoms.

RESULTS

No adverse ocular effect from the ASED was found in our series (except one fungal keratitis). All patients reported either improvement (55%) or stability (45%) in their ocular symptoms upon the use of ASED. In patients with available data before and after starting treatment, the corneal staining score improved by a median of 1 (p = 0.003) and the LogMAR visual acuity had a non-significant improvement.

CONCLUSION

In our study, ASED used by patients with ocular GVHD were both safe and effective. ASED should be considered in patients with GVHD who suffer from dry eyes.

The Effect of Topical Diquafosol Tetrasodium 3% on Dry Eye After Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of 3% diquafosol tetrasodium for treating dry eye after cataract surgery.

METHODS

Among patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery, 34, who met the diagnostic criteria for dry eye syndrome 1 week postoperatively, were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 3.0% diquafosol tetrasodium ophthalmic solution in one eye and 0.9% saline in the other eye four times daily for 8 weeks. Dry eye severity was measured at 1, 5, and 9 postoperative weeks using the Schirmer 1 test (SIT), tear film breakup time (TBUT), and fluorescein corneal staining. tear meniscus height (TMH), tear meniscus depth (TMD), and tear meniscus area (TMA) measured using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and symptom questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

TBUT and corneal staining significantly improved 8 weeks postoperatively in eyes treated with 3.0% diquafosol tetrasodium (p < 0.01, p < 0.01) and were better than normal saline-treated eyes (p < 0.01, p < 0.01). SIT did not improve (p = 0.26). TMH, TMD, and TMA did not improve at 4 and 8 weeks. All symptom questionnaire scores improved in eyes treated with 3.0% diquafosol tetrasodium (all p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The 3.0% diquafosol tetrasodium treatment improved tear film stability and subjective symptoms of dry eye after cataract surgery. Increased mucin production as a result of diquafosol treatment may have caused these results.

Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma Eye Drops in the Treatment of Recurrent Corneal Erosions

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) eye drops in the treatment of recurrent corneal erosions (RCE).

METHODS

A total of 47 eyes were included in this retrospective study. Clinical records of 20 consecutive patients with RCE who had been treated with conventional lubricant eye drops (conventional treatment group) from June 2006 to December 2008 and 27 consecutive patients treated with autologous PRP eye drops in addition to lubricant eye drops (PRP eye drops treated group) from January 2009 to September 2014 were reviewed. Major and minor recurrences were recorded and compared between two groups.

RESULTS

This study included 31 men and 16 women. The mean age was 44.5 ± 14.5 years (range, 19 to 86 years), and the mean follow-up duration was 14.9 ± 14.4 months (range, 6 to 64 months). Of the 27 cases in the PRP eye drops treated group, there were seven major recurrences in six eyes (22.2%) and ten minor recurrences in seven eyes (25.9%). In contrast, 16 eyes (80.0%) from the 20 patients in the conventional lubricant eye drops treated group had major recurrences, and all patients in this group reported minor recurrences. The mean frequency of recurrence was 0.06 ± 0.08 per month in the PRP eye drops treated group and 0.39 ± 0.24 per month in the conventional treatment group (p = 0.003). No side effects were noted in any of the patients over the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PRP eye drops for the treatment of RCE was shown to be effective in reducing the recurrence rate without any significant complications.

The use of autologous serum for the treatment of ocular surface disease at a Swedish tertiary referral center

PURPOSE

The study aims to describe an intact cohort with mixed ocular surface disease (OSD) treated with autologous serum (AS) eye drops in a tertiary eye center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All cases (n=32 eyes, 24 patients) treated with AS for OSD at the Department of Ophthalmology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, between 2002 and 2013 were included and medical records were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Mean duration of treatment with 20% AS was 28.3±56.1 (median: 12, range: 3-217) days. The most common indication for AS treatment was a persistent epithelial defect (PED), which was seen in 16 eyes of 14 patients. Mean duration of PED prior to treatment was 19.3±18.9 (median: 10, range: 5-68) days. Complete or partial epithelial healing occurred in nine eyes (56.2%). The remaining seven eyes (44%) did not respond to treatment or data were missing. The second group consisted of nine eyes of five patients with superficial punctate keratitis (SPK) secondary to dry eye syndrome. Complete or partial healing of the epithelium occurred in five eyes (56%), and the remaining four eyes (44%) were lost to follow-up. A third group included five eyes with AS as an adjuvant treatment after corneal perforation, whereas a fourth group consisted of one patient with dry eye after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, patients with PED or SPK responded well to treatment with AS. Standardized preparation protocols, defined optimal serum concentrations for various indications, and large randomized clinical trials are needed to fully comprehend the role of AS in the treatment of OSD.

Safety of treatments for primary Sjögren's syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is a disabling auto-immune disease, affecting exocrine glands and several organs.

AREAS COVERED

In this review we analyze the safety of therapies used in pSS. Symptomatic treatment is widely applied due to the good supportive effect and good safety profile. Systemic stimulation of tears and saliva can be successful in pSS. However, cumbersome adverse events can influence the tolerability of this therapy. Evidence for the effectiveness of synthetic DMARDs therapies in pSS is limited, while there is a risk of adverse events. Several studies on biologic DMARD treatment of pSS patients have shown promising efficacy and safety results.

EXPERT OPINION

The safety of symptomatic treatment of pSS is very good. However, systemic therapy is necessary to achieve long-term relieve and prevention of organ-damage. Synthetic DMARDs have not shown much efficacy in earlier studies, and their benefits do not weigh up to the possible harms, while biologic DMARDs show promising results regarding efficacy and cause mostly mild adverse events. Many questions remain unanswered regarding safety of DMARDs in pSS. There is a need for well designed studies, in which safety should be evaluated in a uniform manner to be able to compare the results between studies.

Autologous serum eye drops for the treatment of ocular surface disease

OBJECTIVE

To examine the evidence for the role of autologous serum eye drops (ASD) in disease of the ocular surface.

METHODS

A search of the literature published through May 2014 using PubMed, the ISI Web of Knowledge database, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Qualified articles were selected after review of titles, abstracts, and references.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in either symptoms or some of the clinical examination findings, including tear breakup time, corneal staining, Schirmer values, and impression cytology in eyes with persistent corneal epithelial defect, graft-versus-host disease, Sjögren- and non-Sjögren-related dry eye disease, limbal stem-cell deficiency, recurrent corneal erosion, superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis, and postrefractive surgery. However, most of the studies were nonrandomized in nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the paucity of strong supporting evidence from randomized double-masked clinical studies, there seems to be a trend toward superiority of ASD in alleviating some of the clinical signs and symptoms associated with corneal pathology in a variety of conditions that affect the ocular surface compared with conventional lubricating drops/ointments.

Therapeutic Strategies to Treat Dry Eye in an Aging Population

Dry eye (DE) is a prevalent ocular disease that primarily affects the elderly. Affecting up to 30% of adults aged 50 years and older, DE affects both visual function and quality of life. Symptoms of DE, including ocular pain (aching, burning), visual disturbances, and tearing, can be addressed with therapeutic agents that target dysfunction of the meibomian glands, lacrimal glands, goblet cells, ocular surface, and/or neural network. This review provides an overview of the efficacy, use, and limitations of current therapeutic interventions being used to treat DE.

Expert opinion in the management of aqueous Deficient Dry Eye Disease (DED)

Background

Dry eye disease (DED) affects millions of people worldwide. There are a variety of new treatments beyond traditional therapies such as preservative free artificial tears. Here, we conduct a survey to identify the most common treatments used among specialists and assess their interest in newer therapies.

Methods

An international survey was distributed to dry eye researchers and expert practitioners via an internet survey. The survey data collected were analyzed with descriptive statistics.

Results

One hundred and fifteen respondents completed the survey; of these, 66 % were cornea specialists. The most commonly prescribed topical treatments included cyclosporine A (CSA) 0.05 % (71/104, 68 %), fluorometholone (FML) 0.1 % (59/99, 60 %), loteprednol etabonate 0.5 % (50/99, 51 %), and autologous serum eye drops (ASD; 48/97, 49 %). The most commonly prescribed non-topical medications included essential fatty acid supplements (72/104, 69 %), low-dose doxycycline (oral; 61/100, 61 %), and flaxseed supplements (32/96, 33 %) as well as punctal plugs (76/102, 75 %). Respondents reported treatment with topical corticosteroids for 2 to 8 weeks (46/86, 53 %), followed by less than 2 weeks (24/86, 28 %) and with topical CSA between 2 to 8 weeks (45/85, 53 %) followed by 2 to 6 months (24/85, 28 %). The top three signs and symptoms reported to indicate treatment response were, in order, fluorescein staining of the cornea, reduction in foreign body sensation, and reduction in burning sensation.

Conclusion

This survey offers insight into current expert opinion in the treatment of DED. The results of this survey are hypothesis generating and will aid in the design of future clinical studies.

Targeting growth factor supply in keratopathy treatment: comparison between maternal peripheral blood and cord blood as sources for the preparation of topical eye drops

BACKGROUND

Epitheliotrophic growth factors (GF) can be supplied topically to patients with severe keratopathy through a variety of blood-derived products. We compared GF content in adult peripheral blood serum (PB-S) and cord blood serum (CB-S) as potential sources of GF. To limit inter-individual variability the assessment was performed in maternal-child pairs at the time of delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The amounts of epidermal GF (EGF), insulin-like GF (IGF), transforming GF-beta (TGF-β), vascular endothelial GF (VEGF) in CB units collected from the umbilical vein and PB from mothers (each group n=30) were estimated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Obstetric characteristics and haematological data were recorded from the archives of the Emilia Romagna Cord Blood Bank. Statistical evaluations were performed by Wilcoxon's test and correlations between variables were determined using Spearman's (ρ) coefficient; p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

EGF, TGF-β and VEGF levels were significantly higher in CB-S than in PB-S (median 1,254.4 vs 646.0 pg/mL, 51.3 vs 38.4 μg/mL and 686.8 vs 30 pg/mL, respectively; all p<0.0001) whereas IGF content was significantly higher in PB-S than in CB-S (159.9 vs 53.5 pg/mL, respectively; p<0.0001). In CB-S, the CD34(+) cell concentration appeared to be related to EGF, IGF and TGF-β levels whereas white blood cell count appeared to be related to EGF and TGF-β levels. VEGF levels showed no relation to the haematological parameters considered. Platelet counts were not related to GF level in either CB or PB.

DISCUSSION

The GF content in the two blood sources was different, with CB containing larger amounts. Each GF selectively regulates cellular processes involved in corneal healing, so the use of PB or CB should be targeted to supply specific GF on the basis of the type and severity of the keratopathy.