Autologous Serum Eye Drops versus Artificial Tear Drops for Dry Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of autologous serum (AS) eye drops and artificial tears (AT) in dry eye disease (DED).

METHODS

Five databases (PubMed, Science Direct, the Cochrane Library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Wanfang Database) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Efficacy was evaluated in terms of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Schirmer I test, tear break-up time (TBUT), and fluorescein and rose bengal staining of ocular surface. The estimated effects of AS or AT were expressed as a proportion with the 95% confidence interval and plotted on a forest plot.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs with 267 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. For most of the studies, subjects' age was around 50 years old, and the mostly treatment duration was within 8 weeks. The follow-up results showed that the OSDI after AS treatment was lower than that after the AT treatment: the mean difference (MD) was -10.75 (95% CI, -18.12; -3.39) points. There was no difference on the Schirmer I test after treatment between the two groups: the MD was 1.68 (95% CI, -0.65; 4.00) mm. The TBUT of the AS group was longer than that of the AT group, with an MD of 4.53 (95% CI, 2.02; 7.05) s. There was no statistically significant difference on fluorescein staining score of the ocular surface between the AS group and the AT group, the MD was -2.53 (95% CI, -6.08; 1.03) points. The rose bengal staining score of the AS group was slightly lower than that of the AT group after treatment: the MD was -0.78 (95% CI, -1.34; -0.22) points.

CONCLUSION

AS could be an effective treatment for DED, improving OSDI, TBUT, and rose bengal staining score. Further RCTs with large samples and long-term follow-up are still needed to determine the exact role of AS in the management of DED.

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of preserved and preservative-free hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-dextran-containing eyedrops

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of two sustained-release formulation of artificial tear drops.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a randomized patient-masked clinical trial, a total 88 patients into two group A (n=41; with single dose of artificial tear, containing dextran 70, 1mg/ml and hypromellose, 3mg/ml hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) and group B (n=47; with multidose of artificial tear, containing 0.3g HPMC and 0.1g of dextran 70, with 0.01% benzalkonium chloride (BAK) as preservative) were completed the study. The ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, tear break up time (TBUT), corneal and conjunctival staining and Schirmer test, were performed. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess the differences among the two products. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The mean of age of the participants in the Group A and B was 44.08±6.29 (range, 33-58 years) years and 45.83±8.42 (31-60 years), respectively. In comparing two groups before the intervention, the OSDI scores, the TBUT scores, the conjunctival and corneal staining scores and the Schirmer scores did not show statistically significant differences (p=0.339, p=0.640, p=0.334, p=0.807 and p=0.676, respectively). After 4 weeks, the OSDI scores, conjunctival and corneal staining scores showed improvement in compare to those before the intervention (p<0.001). But, the differences for the Schirmer test score and TBUT score was not significant (p=0.115, p=0.013, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our outcomes indicated that improvement occurred with use of both products but there was no statistically significant difference between them.