Percutaneous tracheostomy--a new method

Percutaneous tracheostomy in the pediatric population: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous tracheostomy is routinely performed in adult patients but is seldomly used in the pediatric population due to concerns regarding safety and limited available evidence. This study aims to consolidate the current literature on percutaneous tracheostomy in the pediatric population.

METHODS

A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched for studies on pediatric percutaneous tracheostomy (age ≤18). The Joanna Briggs Institute and ROBINS-I tools were used for quality appraisal.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles were included resulting in 143 patients. Patient age ranged from 2 days to 17 years, with the largest subpopulation of patients (n = 57, 40 %) being adolescents (age between 12 and 17 years old). Main indications for percutaneous tracheostomy included prolonged ventilation (n = 6), respiratory insufficiency (n = 5), and upper airway obstruction (n = 5). One-third (n = 47) of percutaneous tracheostomies were completed at the bedside in an intensive care unit. Select studies reported on surgical time and time from intubation to tracheostomy with a mean of 13.8 (SD = 7.8) minutes (n = 27) and 8.9 (SD = 2.8) days (n = 35), respectively. Major postoperative complications included tracheoesophageal fistula (n = 4, 2.8 %) and pneumothorax (n = 3, 2.1 %). There were four conversions to open tracheostomy.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous tracheostomy had a similar risk of complications to open surgical tracheostomy in children and adolescents and can be performed at the bedside in a select group of patients if necessary. However, we feel that consideration must be given to the varying anatomical considerations in children and adolescents compared with adults, and therefore suggest that this procedure be reserved for adolescent patients with a thin body habitus and clearly demarcated and palpable anatomical landmarks who require a tracheostomy. When performed, we strongly support using endoscopic guidance and a surgeon who has the ability to convert to an open tracheostomy if required.

Suspension laryngoscopy-assisted percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a safe method in COVID-19

Objective

COVID-19 respiratory insufficiency has augmented demand of tracheostomies in intubated patients. Herein, we analyse our experience with suspension laryngoscopy-assisted percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (SL-PDT) to assess the safety for both healthcare personnel and patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent SL-PDT in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) between March 13 and April 17, 2020 (first peak of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic).

Results

We included 28 SL-PDTs conducted in the ICU by a single operator using standard personal protective equipment (PPE) for high-risk procedures. The average procedure time was 30 minutes. Intraoperative complications were few, mild and promptly resolved. No operators were infected after the procedure.

Conclusions

SL-PDT is a safe and quick technique: it is preferable to open surgical procedures, where air-flow cessation cannot be achieved and droplet emission is high. The cost/benefit ratio is low. A disadvantage is the need for an ENT surgeon who is familiar with direct laryngoscopy, with the main difficulty being the exposure of the upper airways. Minimal air leakage and good control of occasional bleeding makes it a safe procedure for the patient and medical personnel alike.

Prolonged Weaning: S2k Guideline Published by the German Respiratory Society

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is an essential part of modern intensive care medicine. MV is performed in patients with severe respiratory failure caused by respiratory muscle insufficiency and/or lung parenchymal disease; that is, when other treatments such as medication, oxygen administration, secretion management, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or nasal high-flow therapy have failed. MV is required for maintaining gas exchange and allows more time to curatively treat the underlying cause of respiratory failure. In the majority of ventilated patients, liberation or "weaning" from MV is routine, without the occurrence of any major problems. However, approximately 20% of patients require ongoing MV, despite amelioration of the conditions that precipitated the need for it in the first place. Approximately 40-50% of the time spent on MV is required to liberate the patient from the ventilator, a process called "weaning". In addition to acute respiratory failure, numerous factors can influence the duration and success rate of the weaning process; these include age, comorbidities, and conditions and complications acquired during the ICU stay. According to international consensus, "prolonged weaning" is defined as the weaning process in patients who have failed at least 3 weaning attempts, or require more than 7 days of weaning after the first spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Given that prolonged weaning is a complex process, an interdisciplinary approach is essential for it to be successful. In specialised weaning centres, approximately 50% of patients with initial weaning failure can be liberated from MV after prolonged weaning. However, the heterogeneity of patients undergoing prolonged weaning precludes the direct comparison of individual centres. Patients with persistent weaning failure either die during the weaning process, or are discharged back to their home or to a long-term care facility with ongoing MV. Urged by the growing importance of prolonged weaning, this Sk2 Guideline was first published in 2014 as an initiative of the German Respiratory Society (DGP), in conjunction with other scientific societies involved in prolonged weaning. The emergence of new research, clinical study findings and registry data, as well as the accumulation of experience in daily practice, have made the revision of this guideline necessary. The following topics are dealt with in the present guideline: Definitions, epidemiology, weaning categories, underlying pathophysiology, prevention of prolonged weaning, treatment strategies in prolonged weaning, the weaning unit, discharge from hospital on MV, and recommendations for end-of-life decisions. Special emphasis was placed on the following themes: (1) A new classification of patient sub-groups in prolonged weaning. (2) Important aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation and neurorehabilitation in prolonged weaning. (3) Infrastructure and process organisation in the care of patients in prolonged weaning based on a continuous treatment concept. (4) Changes in therapeutic goals and communication with relatives. Aspects of paediatric weaning are addressed separately within individual chapters. The main aim of the revised guideline was to summarize both current evidence and expert-based knowledge on the topic of "prolonged weaning", and to use this information as a foundation for formulating recommendations related to "prolonged weaning", not only in acute medicine but also in the field of chronic intensive care medicine. The following professionals served as important addressees for this guideline: intensivists, pulmonary medicine specialists, anaesthesiologists, internists, cardiologists, surgeons, neurologists, paediatricians, geriatricians, palliative care clinicians, rehabilitation physicians, intensive/chronic care nurses, physiotherapists, respiratory therapists, speech therapists, medical service of health insurance, and associated ventilator manufacturers.

Conventional Tracheostomy Versus Percutaneous Tracheostomy: A Retrospective Study

Objectives Emergency Tracheostomy is a life saving surgical procedure. With the advent of newer instruments and equipments in the critical care units, there is marked improvement in the quality of care of the critically ill patients and such patients are able to survive for a longer period. Elective tracheostomy is being done in those patients who needs positive pressure ventilation, for a longer duration. Objectives of our study are to compare conventional tracheostomy (CT) to percutaneous tracheostomy (PcT) and to identify the strategy with the lowest frequency of potentially life threatening events. Study Design Retrospective comparative study. Patients Included 30 patients who met inclusion criteria. Study Settings Tertiary care centre (medical college). Results 15 patients underwent CT and 15 underwent PcT. Blood loss, mean operation time and complications were compared. Blood loss and operation time was lesser in CT compared to PcT. There were no reported complications in both the techniques. Conclusion In our study CT took lesser time with lesser blood loss and without any complications. But statistically, this difference was not significant. Thus person with refined skill in the technique is of utmost importance in deciding the choice of a technique.

Comparison of Open, Percutaneous, and Translaryngeal Tracheostomies

INTRODUCTION: With 3 tracheostomy techniques currently available, controversy exists regarding which is safest and most economical. Percutaneous (PDT) and the new translaryngeal (TLT) tracheostomies are cited as more cost-effective than the traditional open surgical procedure because they are bedside techniques. Our objective was to compare the perioperative and postoperative complications of the 3 techniques.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective trial involving 100 consecutive patients who underwent tracheostomy between April and December of 1997 at the London Health Sciences Centre and St Joseph's Health Centre in London, Canada.

RESULTS: Fifty open tracheostomies were performed. Indications included prolonged ventilation (n = 42), airway protection (n = 5), pulmonary hygiene (n = 2), and sleep apnea (n = 1). A tension pneumothorax was the one significant intraoperative complication. Fifteen postoperative complications occurred, most notable of which was a 2-L hemorrhage at 24 hours. Thirty-seven TLTs were performed, 20 in patients with coagulopathy. Indications were prolonged intubation (n = 27), airway protection (n = 9), and pulmonary hygiene (n = 1). One intraoperative complication of accidental decannulation occurred. One postoperative complication, a pretracheal abscess, occurred in a decannulated transplant patient 2 weeks after the procedure. Thirteen PDTs were performed. Indications were prolonged intubation (n = 6), airway protection (n = 6), and tracheal toilet (n = 1). No significant complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS: TLT and PDT have fewer complications than the traditional open technique. TLT appears to have the greatest utility in the coagulopathic patient.

Percutaneous techniques versus surgical techniques for tracheostomy

BACKGROUND

Tracheostomy formation is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in critically ill intensive care participants requiring long-term mechanical ventilation. Both surgical tracheostomies (STs) and percutaneous tracheostomies (PTs) are used in current surgical practice; but until now, the optimal method of performing tracheostomies in critically ill participants remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous techniques compared to surgical techniques commonly used for elective tracheostomy in critically ill participants (adults and children) to assess whether there was a difference in complication rates between the procedures. We also assessed whether the effect varied between different groups of participants or settings (intensive care unit (ICU), operating room), different levels of operator experience, different percutaneous techniques, or whether the percutaneous techniques were carried out with or without bronchoscopic guidance.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL to 28 May 2015. We also searched reference lists of articles, 'grey literature', and dissertations. We handsearched intensive care and anaesthesia journals, abstracts, and proceedings of scientific meetings. We attempted to identify unpublished or ongoing studies by contacting manufacturers and experts in the field, and searching in trial registers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs) comparing percutaneous techniques (experimental intervention) with surgical techniques (control intervention) used for elective tracheostomy in critically ill participants (adults and children).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently checked eligibility and extracted data on methodological quality, participant characteristics, intervention details, settings, and outcomes of interest using a standardized form. We then entered data into Review Manager 5, with a double-entry procedure.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 785 identified citations, 20 trials from 1990 to 2011 enrolling 1652 participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We judged most of the trials to be at low or unclear risk of bias across the six domains, and we judged four studies to have elements of high risk of bias; we did not classify any studies at overall low risk of bias. The quality of evidence was low for five of the seven outcomes (very low N = 1, moderate N = 1) and there was heterogeneity among the studies. There was a variety of adult participants and the procedures were performed by a wide range of differently experienced operators in different situations.There was no evidence of a difference in the rate of the primary outcomes: mortality directly related to the procedure (Peto odds ratio (POR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10 to 2.60, I² = 44%, P = 0.42, 4 studies, 257 participants, low quality evidence); and serious, life-threatening adverse events - intraoperatively: risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.53, I² = 27%, P = 0.78, 12 studies, 1211 participants, low quality evidence,and direct postoperatively: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.25, I² = 24%, P = 0.24, 10 studies, 984 participants, low quality evidence.PTs significantly reduce the rate of the secondary outcome, wound infection/stomatitis by 76% (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.37, I² = 0%, P < 0.00001, 12 studies, 936 participants, moderate quality evidence) and the rate of unfavourable scarring by 75% (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.91, I² = 86%, P = 0.04, 6 studies, 789 participants, low quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference in the rate of the secondary outcomes, major bleeding (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.09, I² = 47%, P = 0.12, 10 studies, 984 participants, very low quality evidence) and tracheostomy tube occlusion/obstruction, accidental decannulation, difficult tube change (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.82, I² = 22%, P = 0.42, 6 studies, 538 participants, low quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When compared to STs, PTs significantly reduce the rate of wound infection/stomatitis (moderate quality evidence) and the rate of unfavourable scarring (low quality evidence due to imprecision and heterogeneity). In terms of mortality and the rate of serious adverse events, there was low quality evidence that non-significant positive effects exist for PTs. In terms of the rate of major bleeding, there was very low quality evidence that non-significant positive effects exist for PTs.However, because several groups of participants were excluded from the included studies, the number of participants in the included studies was limited, long-term outcomes were not evaluated, and data on participant-relevant outcomes were either sparse or not available for each study, the results of this meta-analysis are limited and cannot be applied to all critically ill adults.

Anesthetic Implications for Tracheal Injury During Bronchoscopy-Guided Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy

Bronchoscopic-guided percutaneous dilational tracheostomy has become one of the most common elective tracheostomy methods for patients requiring prolonged ventilatory support. The safety profile, patient selection, and risks as well as complication management, when compared with an open surgical technique, remain somewhat controversial with no clear recommendations. We present a case of a critically ill patient undergoing percutaneous dilation tracheostomy complicated by tracheal wall injury and airway loss. The airway was successfully conservatively managed as well as the tracheal injury. Anesthetic implications, safety, and management options as well as recommendations are reviewed.

Bedside Percutaneous Tracheostomy versus Open Surgical Tracheostomy in Non-ICU Patients

Percutaneous bedside tracheostomy (PBT) is a one of the common and safe procedures in intensive care units through the world. In the present paper we published our clinical experience with a performance of PBTs in the regular ward by intensive care physicians' team. We found it safe and similar outcome in comparison to open surgical tracheostomy method in operation room by ENT team. The performance of PBT in the regular ward showed potential economic advantages in saving medical staff and operating room resources.

Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy

Tracheostomy is a commonly performed intervention with several benefits in the treatment of patients with chronic respiratory failure. Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy techniques have allowed bedside tracheostomy placement in the modern intensive care unit. Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy can be safely performed by interventional pulmonologists, medical intensive care physicians, and surgical specialists. When performed with the assistance of adjuncts, such as flexible bronchoscopy, the percutaneous dilational method has a favorable complication rate, efficiency, and cost profile compared with surgical tracheostomy.

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy

For decades, the standard technique for tracheostomy was the open, surgical technique. However, during the past 20 years, the use of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy has been increased and shown to be a feasible and safe procedure in critically ill patients. The purpose of this report is to review the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy technique, describe the role of bronchoscopy as guidance for the procedure, and identify the available evidences comparing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy to surgical tracheostomy.

A technical modification for percutaneous tracheostomy: prospective case series study on one hundred patients

The purpose of this study is to describe a technical modification of percutaneous tracheostomy that combines principles of the Percu Twist™ and the Griggs-Portex® methods in a reusable kit. One hundred patients underwent the procedure. There were no false passage, tube misplacement, or deaths related to the procedure. There were two minor bleedings managed conservatively. The technical modification described in this study is safe and simple to execute.

External light guidance for percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PDT) is considered a safe technique; however, there is still room for improvement. We present our initial experience with an external white light guide to position the endotracheal tube and guide needle placement during PDT.

METHODS

This is a retrospective series of 15 consecutive patients undergoing external light-guided PDT. A white light source was placed on the anterior trachea wall externally and the transmitted light was identified in the tracheal lumen with a bronchoscopic to predict the needle entrance point.

RESULTS

The transmitted light was rapidly identified in all 15 patients, facilitated endotracheal tube tip placement in the subglottis in approximately 10 seconds in 13 of 15 patients, and predicted needle penetration into the trachea within 1 to 2 mm of the external light in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

External light guidance facilitates rapid, accurate placement of the needle through the tracheal wall and can reduce surgeon anxiety, especially in teaching situations.

Usefulness and Safety of Open Tracheostomy by a Paramedian Approach for Cervical Infection: Esophageal and Tracheal Injury and Necrotizing Fascitis

Tracheostomy is hardly performed in patients with cervical infection close to the site of the tracheostomy. This study aimed to present and clarify the usefulness and safety of open tracheostomy performed by the paramedian approach technique. The procedure is as follows. A 2.5-cm paramedian incision is made for the tracheostomy on the opposite side of infectious focus; the anterior neck muscles are dissected and split; the trachea is fenestrated by a reverse U-shaped incision; and the fenestral flap of the trachea is fixed to the skin. We used this technique in five patients. There were no complications such as bleeding, desaturation, and displacement of the tube; and there were no postoperative complications such as severe contamination or infection of the tracheostomy site from the nearby cervical wound, difficulty in securing the tracheostomy tube and connecting device to the ventilator, difficulties in daily management and care, or dislocation of the tracheostomy tube. All wounds resulting from the tracheostomy were kept separate from and not contaminated by the nearby dirty wounds. Open tracheostomy by the paramedian approach technique is useful and safe for patients with severe cervical infection requiring open drainage and long ventilatory management.

Percutaneous tracheotomy

Tracheotomy is one of the most commonly performed procedures in critically ill patients. This article describes in particular the use of percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy. A brief history is included.

Acute upper airway failure and mediastinal emphysema following a wire-guided percutaneous cricothyrotomy in a patient with severe maxillofacial trauma

BACKGROUND

In the presence of severe maxillofacial trauma, management of the airway is important because this condition poses a significant threat to airway patency. That securing the airway is not always straightforward is described and illustrated in this paper.

CASE

We present the case of a 23-year-old patient who sustained severe maxillofacial injury for which airway control was necessary. A wire-guided percutaneous dilation cricothyrotomy was performed, which was most probably the cause of an acute loss of airway patency. The literature regarding the role of percutaneous techniques in an elective and emergency setting is reviewed.

Complications Associated with the use of Temporary Tracheostomies: An Ill-Defined Problem?

Tracheostomy is one of the most commonly conducted procedures in critically ill patients. However even a temporary tracheostomy has risks which include the life-threatening complications of obstruction and displacement. This survey examined the use of temporary tracheostomies by critical care clinicians in the UK. The results suggest that although progress is being made, practice relating to temporary tracheostomy varies considerably as do the governance arrangements that underpin it. In the absence of national guidance, clinicians need to review their operational policies relating to patients with a temporary tracheostomy, including choice of tracheostomy tube, education and training of relevant staff and governance arrangements underpinning patient care in all clinical areas caring for patients with tracheostomies.

Tracheal stenosis after placement of percutaneous dilational tracheotomy

OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous dilational tracheotomy procedures have been used successfully as a bedside alternative to open surgical tracheotomy. At our institution, we have seen patients with tracheal injuries following this procedure. In this paper, we review those cases to demonstrate that tracheal stenosis is a potential long-term complication of percutaneous dilational tracheotomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

METHODS

Patients were evaluated with computed tomography and operative endoscopy. Inpatient and outpatient records were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Nine patients were referred to our practice for management of tracheal stenosis after percutaneous dilational tracheotomy between 2003 and 2006. Presence of anterior tracheal ring compression and destruction or lateral wall collapse was noted in each case. Endoscopy revealed stenosis secondary to anterior tracheal wall injury in all cases. In eight of nine cases, operative intervention was needed to correct the stenotic segment.

CONCLUSIONS

It has been demonstrated in the literature that with 20 years of experience, the percutaneous dilational tracheotomy procedure is more affordable, faster to perform, and a generally safe procedure when performed under appropriate conditions. Most case series of percutaneous dilational tracheotomy reveal an equal or lower risk of short-term complications than open tracheotomy. This series demonstrates that tracheal stenosis is a potential long-term complication. Longitudinal follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous dilational tracheotomy is indicated.

Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy in a Community Intensive Care Unit

PURPOSE

Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) is increasingly being used to replace traditional surgical tracheostomy (ST) in the management of critically ill patients. There is considerable controversy regarding the safety of this procedure in the hands of non-surgeons, and most data so far have come from large tertiary care centres. We report our experience and safety data in the implementation of a PDT program for critically ill patients in a teaching community hospital in an attempt to demonstrate that this procedure can be performed safely outside of an academic ICU.

METHODS

Prospective observational study in a large community teaching hospital. All patients without contraindications were considered for enrollment. Contraindications to PDT included evidence of infection at the surgical site, the presence of a coagulopathy not correctable to an international normalized ratio of less than 1.5, or unstable cervical spine injuries. A total of 42 patients were included in the study and all received PDT using the Ciaglia Blue Rhino single dilator introducer set (Cook Critical Care, Bloomington, IN, USA). Data collected included patient age, sex, reason for intubation, and complications.

RESULTS

Of 42 patients, 25 were males, and 17 were females. The average age was 47.6 years (range 16-87 years). The commonest admitting diagnosis was traumatic brain injury, followed by sepsis and cardiac arrest. Our total recorded complication rate was 7.1%, with no deaths. There were two episodes of transient hypotension (4.8%).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy appears to be at least as safe as traditional ST, and may have advantages with respect to timeliness and minimization of patient transport. The complication rate seen in our program is similar to that seen in other PDT series.

Percutaneous dilation tracheotomy in intensive care unit patients

OBJECTIVES

In our department, we routinely use percutaneous dilation tracheotomy (PDT) in select intensive care unit (ICU) patients requiring prolonged intubation and mechanical ventilation. We present our experience with this technique and discuss the pros and cons of PDT in the intensive care setting.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive PDTs performed in our institution between 2002 and 2004. Demographic information and procedural and postoperative complications were noted.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-four PDTs were performed on intensive care unit patients during this time period. Complications included five cases of excessive intraoperative bleeding (1.8%), one postoperative hemorrhage (0.3%), one tracheoesophageal fistula (0.3%), one pneumothorax (0.3%), and four accidental decannulations (1.4%). No PDT-associated deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

PDT is advantageous for the patient as it is performed at bedside in the ICU. It is our conclusion that this technique is suitable for many, but not all, critical care patients.

Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: A randomized controlled study with long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety, availability, and long-term sequelae of percutaneous vs. surgical tracheostomy.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled study.

SETTING

Combined medical/surgical intensive care unit in a tertiary referral hospital.

PATIENTS

Two hundred critically ill mechanically ventilated patients who required tracheostomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Tracheostomy by either percutaneous tracheostomy or surgical tracheostomy performed in the intensive care unit.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome measure was the aggregate incidence of predefined moderate or severe complications. The secondary outcome measures were the incidence of each of the components of the primary outcome. Long-term follow-up included clinical assessment, flow volume loops, and bronchoscopy. Both groups were well matched for age, gender, admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, period of endotracheal intubation, reason for intubation, and admission diagnosis. There was no statistical difference between groups for the primary outcome. Bleeding requiring surgical intervention occurred in three percutaneous tracheostomy patients and in no surgical tracheostomy patient (p = .2). Postoperative infection (p = .044) and cosmetic sequelae (p = .08) were more common in surgical tracheostomy patients. There was a shorter delay from randomization to percutaneous tracheostomy vs. surgical tracheostomy (p = .006). Long-term follow-up revealed no complications in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both percutaneous tracheostomies and surgical tracheostomies can be safely performed at the bedside by experienced, skilled practitioners.

Prospective randomized comparison of progressive dilational vs forceps dilational percutaneous tracheostomy

This trial prospectively compares two methods of percutaneous tracheostomy, both routinely used in ICU: the Ciaglia progressive dilational tracheostomy and the Griggs forceps dilational tracheostomy. One hundred patients were randomized using a single-blinded envelope method to receive progressive or forceps percutaneous tracheostomy performed at the bedside. Operative time, the occurrence of hypoxaemia or hypercapnia and complications were recorded. The progressive technique took longer than the forceps technique (median 7 (range 2-26) vs. 4 (1-16) minutes, P = 0.0005). Hypercapnia occurred in both groups but was more marked with the progressive technique (56 (16) vs. 49 (13) mmHg, P = 0.0082). Minor complications (minor bleeding, transient hypoxaemia, damage to posterior tracheal wall without emphysema) were also more frequent with the progressive technique (31 vs. 9 complications, P < 0.0001). Six major complications occurred with the progressive technique, none with the forceps technique (P = 0.0085): tension pneumothorax, posterior tracheal wall injury with subcutaneous emphysema, loss of airway with hypoxaemia, loss of stoma with impossible re-catheterization, and two conversions to another technique. In conclusion, progressive dilational tracheostomy took longer, caused more hypercapnia and more minor and major difficulties than forceps dilational tracheostomy.

Endoscopic percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy: a prospective evaluation of 500 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

An evaluation of 500 adult, intubated, intensive care unit patients undergoing endoscopic percutaneous tracheotomy using the multiple and single dilator techniques was conducted to assess the feasibility and safety of the procedure as it compares with surgical tracheotomy. Endoscopy was used in all cases and evaluated as an added safety measure in reducing complications.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective evaluation of endoscopic percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy in 500 consecutive adult, intubated intensive care unit patients.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 2003, endoscopically guided percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PDT) was performed in 500 consecutive adult, intubated patients in the intensive care units (ICU) of three tertiary care adult hospitals. The first 191 patients underwent PDT using the Ciaglia Percutaneous Tracheostomy Introducer Kit (Cook Critical Care Inc., Bloomington, Indiana) and in the remaining 309 patients the Ciaglia Blue Rhino Single Dilator Kit (Cook Critical Care Inc., Bloomington, Indiana) was used. The procedure was contraindicated in the following situations: 1) children, 2) unprotected airway, 3) emergencies, 4) presence of a midline neck mass, 5) inability to palpate the cricoid cartilage, and 6) uncorrectable coagulopathy. The following parameters were recorded preoperatively: age, sex, diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) class, body mass index (BMI), and number of days intubated. Recorded hematologic parameters included hemoglobin (Hgb), platelets, prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), and the international normalized ratio (INR) since it became available in 1998. All patients were ventilated on 100% oxygen and vital signs were continuously monitored. Tracheotomy was carried out under continuous endoscopic guidance using a series of graduated dilators in the first 191 cases, and a single, tapered dilator in the remaining 309 patients. The preoperative data on each patient, along with the type of dilator used, the size of the tube, the intraoperative and postoperative complications, and blood loss information were recorded prospectively and maintained in a computer spreadsheet. Univariate analyses were used in each group separately for each type of dilator to assess the risks of a complication within subgroups defined by each parameter/characteristic, and the statistical significance assessed with a chi test, or Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

The total complication rate was 9.2% (13.6% in the multiple dilator group, and 6.5% in the single dilator group), with more than half of these considered minor. Overall, the two most common complications were oxygen desaturation in 14 cases and bleeding in 12 cases. The absence of serious complications such as pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum are attributable to the use of bronchoscopy. There was no significant association between the rate of complications and age, gender, ASA, weeks intubated, tracheostomy tube size, Hgb levels, platelets, PT, PTT, or INR. There was a statistically significant relationship between experience and the likelihood of complications in the multiple dilator group (P < .0001), with a higher rate of complications in the first 30 patients (40%) compared with 8.7% in the remaining 161 patients. This relationship did not exist for the first 30 patients in the single dilator group. Patients with a BMI of 30 or higher experienced a significantly greater (P < .05) number of complications (15%), compared with an 8% complication rate in patients with a BMI of less than 30. This risk was even more significant for patients with a BMI of 30 or greater who were also in ASA class 4 (11/56 or 20%) (P < .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic PDT is associated with a low complication rate and is at least as safe as surgical tracheotomy in the ICU setting. Bronchoscopy significantly decreases the incidence of complications and should be used routinely. While embraced by critical care physicians, endoscopic PDT has been infrequently performed by otolaryngologists. As the airway experts, otolaryngologists are in the best position to learn and teach the procedure as it should be done.

How we do it: emergency percutaneous tracheostomy: a case series

Emergency percutaneous tracheostomy is a safe alternative method for providing a definitive airway in an emergency, in trained hands. A general anaesthetic is not required allowing the procedure to be performed outside of the operating theatre. All of the necessary instruments to perform the percutaneous tracheostomy are pre-packaged in one kit. With experience the percutaneous tracheostomy can be performed without a bronchoscopy. Percutaneous tracheostomy can be utilised in a variety of emergency clinical situations requiring rapid access to the airway.

Percutaneous tracheotomy in children

We present three cases of the Fantoni percutaneous translaryngeal tracheostomy (TLT) performed under direct rigid bronchoscopy. The surgeries were performed in the near-drowned 5-year-old boy, and 15-year-old lupus erythematosus girl with a permanent brain damage resulted from a cardiac arrest, 11-year-old cardiac girl with postintubation laryngeal stenosis. In the first two cases, the procedure went uneventful; in one case the tube was accidentally pulled out during the rotation phase and surgical tracheostomy was performed. We describe the TLT procedure in details, calling special attention at the fact that the TLT is especially suitable for children below 10 years of age and is associated with very few complications.

Emergency percutaneous tracheostomy is feasable in experienced hands

One of most stressful situations for a physician occurs when a patient is unable to breathe and endotracheal intubation is not possible. The establishment of an open airway by surgery is indicated only if the physician is unable to do so with an endotracheal tube. Surgical tracheostomy is not indicated in emergency situations because it takes a long time and can result in death if respiratory support cannot be provided during the procedure. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in experienced hands takes only a few minutes. We describe six patients, including two trauma patients, in whom emergency percutaneous tracheostomy was rapidly and successfully performed under conditions of the imminent loss of airway and inability to intubate the patient. As this procedure is safe and can be performed easily by experienced personnel, we propose its addition to the armamentarium of emergency airway management.

Emphysema and Pneumothorax After Percutaneous Tracheostomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Part 1: To describe cases of emphysema (subcutaneous and/or mediastinal) and pneumothorax after percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) in a series of 326 patients, and to review the existing literature describing the incidence and possible mechanisms. Part 2: To analyze the potential mechanisms for the development of emphysema and pneumothorax in human cadaver models.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of PDTs, in combination with an anatomic study in human cadavers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Part 1: All ICU patients who underwent PDT between 1997 and 2002 were enrolled in the study. We analyzed the cases of emphysema and pneumothorax. Similar cases were retrieved from the literature and underwent a systematic review. Part 2: The relevant anatomic structures were studied. We simulated the clinical situation after PDT in a human pathologic study in order to induce subcutaneous emphysema and pneumothorax.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Part 1: Five cases of subcutaneous emphysema (1.5%) and two cases of pneumothorax (0.6%) are described. In the literature search, we found 41 cases of emphysema (1.4%) and 25 cases of pneumothorax (0.8%) in a total of 3,012 patients. Part 2: Subcutaneous emphysema could easily be induced in a human cadaver model by inflating air in the pretracheal tissues and after posterior tracheal wall laceration. Air leakage was also possible through a fenestrated cannula via the space between the inner nonfenestrated cannula and outer cannula and then through the fenestration.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that one mechanism for the development of emphysema is an imperfect positioning of the fenestrated cannula, whereby the fenestration is extraluminal. For this reason, fenestrated cannulas should not be used immediately after placement of a PDT. Posterior tracheal wall laceration is another mechanism responsible for emphysema after PDT. After perforation of the posterior tracheal wall, the pleural space can be reached easily. This may result in a pneumothorax.

Airway problems and new solutions for the obstetric patient

Anesthesia-related complications are the sixth leading cause of pregnancy-related maternal mortality in the United States. Difficult or failed intubation following induction of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery remains the major contributory factor to anesthesia-related maternal complications. Although the use of general anesthesia has been declining in obstetric patients, it may still be required in selected cases. Because difficult intubation in obstetric anesthesia practice is frequently unexpected, careful and timely preanesthetic evaluation of all parturients should identify the majority of patients with difficult airway and avoid unexpected difficult airway management.

Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy techniques

In summary, PDT is a bedside procedure that can be performed with very low morbidity by skilled practitioners. Established methods are undergoing constant evolution and we hope that technical adjuncts are improving patient safety. Evaluation of procedural modifications will require evaluation in randomized clinical trials.

Percutaneous dilation tracheotomy versus surgical tracheotomy: our experience

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous dilation tracheotomy (PDT) is becoming a popular alternative to surgical tracheotomy. In our department, we recently adopted the use of the PDT in intensive care unit patients. Here, we compare the results of the use of these 2 techniques on 150 patients, all performed by the same surgeon. We discuss the pros and cons of PDT and present our experience with the technique compared with surgical tracheotomy (ST).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study of 75 PDTs and a retrospective study of 75 surgical tracheotomies (ST) were performed at the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel. Age, sex, duration of intubation before surgery, time interval between the decision to perform and the performance of tracheotomy, and cost were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty tracheotomies were reviewed. The indication for tracheotomy in both groups was prolonged mechanical ventilation. Seven patients were found unsuitable for PDT and underwent ST. Complications included 3 cases of mild postoperative hemorrhage in the ST group, and 1 case of subcutaneous emphysema, 1 case of stomal cellulitis and 2 cases of mild postoperative hemorrhage in the PDT group. The average waiting interval was between 2 to 5 days for ST and 1 to 24 hours for PDT. The intraoperative time for ST was 20 minutes; for PDT, 5 minutes. The cost was 565 dollars for ST and 274 dollars for PDT.

CONCLUSIONS

PTD provides an easy, less expensive, and convenient alternative to ST and should be added to the otolaryngologists' armamentarium of surgical airway procedures. The procedure is advantageous for the patient. Complication rates of both techniques are similar and low; however, PDT is a blind technique of obtaining a surgical airway and therefore holds more potential for serious complications. It is our conclusion that this technique is suitable for many, but not all, critical care patients and that the procedure should be performed only by surgeons who are capable of urgently obtaining a surgical airway or exploring the neck should the PDT fail.

Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy

Percutaneous techniques for elective tracheostomy have provided a quick and relatively simple method that can be performed in the intensive care unit. Evidence-based studies comparing surgical and percutaneous tracheostomies suggest similar complication rates in trained operators of both techniques.

Percutaneous tracheostomy with single dilatation technique: a prospective, randomized comparison of Ciaglia blue rhino versus Griggs' guidewire dilating forceps

Percutaneous tracheostomy with single-step dilation technique using Griggs' guidewire dilating forceps (GWDF) is a well-recognized procedure. Recently, Ciaglia has introduced a one-step dilation technique using a curved, gradually tapered dilator, the Ciaglia Blue Rhino (CBR). In a prospective, randomized study, we performed percutaneous tracheostomy in 60 consecutive patients, using either the CBR or the GWDF technique. Postoperatively, all patients had bronchoscopy by a blinded consultant, and stoma characteristics and injuries to the trachea were studied. Mean tracheostomy time (skin incision to insertion of tracheostomy tube) in the two procedures (CBR 7.5 min versus GWDF 6.5 min) was not different (P > 0.05). The GWDF technique was associated with under-dilation and over-dilation of the tracheal stoma, each in almost one-third of patients. In the CBR group, the procedure was associated with a significant increase in peak airway pressure (P < 0.05) in all patients. There were nine cases of tracheal cartilage rupture, three cases of longitudinal tracheal abrasion, and one pneumothorax. Three patients had tracheal in-drawing at the scar site with huskiness of voice at 8 wk after decannulation; however, none had any breathing difficulty. We conclude that the techniques are equally effective in the formation of percutaneous tracheostomy. However, tracheal stoma over-dilation with GWDF and increase in peak airway pressure and rupture of tracheal rings with CBR remain major concerns.

IMPLICATIONS

The tracheas of 60 patients were cannulated through an artificial opening by using a single-step dilation technique with Ciaglia Blue Rhino or Griggs' dilation forceps. The techniques were equally effective for cannulation of the trachea. However, Ciaglia Blue Rhino was associated with rupture of tracheal rings in one-third of patients and increased airway pressure in all, whereas the Griggs' technique was associated with under- or over-formation of the tracheal opening, each in one-third of patients.

[Percutaneous tracheostomy]

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the different techniques of percutaneous tracheostomies, their advantages, drawbacks, complications and to compare them to standard surgical tracheostomies. This study will consider only elective (non emergency) bedside procedures in intensive care units.

DATA SOURCES

Extraction from Medline database of english and french articles on percutaneous tracheostomies and searching along with major review articles.

STUDY SELECTION

The collected articles were selected according to their qualities regarding to their evidence level. In addition to several important or historic references, the literature of the five past years was studied.

DATA EXTRACTION

The articles were reviewed according to their contribution for techniques, perioperative and postoperative complications, recent advances, advantages and drawbacks of all procedures. Publications addressing recent comparisons between surgical and percutaneous tracheostomies were specially studied.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Four techniques of bedside percutaneous tracheostomies are available and marketed, in France: Ciaglia's dilation technique (with multiple or unique dilator), Griggs's technique (using a special designed forceps), and Fantoni's technique (Trans Laryngeal Tracheostomy). The most spred but also first described technique is the Ciaglia's (1985). The most recent articles comparing surgical and percutaneous tracheostomies techniques are not able to demonstrate a superiority of one of them in terms of feasibility or safety. In other words, there should be a slight advantage for the percutaneous tracheostomy regarding to the late post-operative complications, as there should be a slight advantage for the surgical techniques regarding to the perioperative complications. The literature analysis point out firstly the learning curve for percutaneous dilational tracheostomy, with a significant decrease of complication incidence with the operator's experience and secondly the continuous endoscopic guidance seems to increase the safety of the percutaneous procedure.

CONCLUSION

Since there has been a great deal of percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care units, the incidence of tracheostomy have increased in those services. There is a trend to replace the surgical procedure by the percutaneous one. However, according to the potentially jeopardizing complications, percutaneous tracheostomy should be done by an experienced operator with the help of a continuous endoscopic guidance.

Percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized comparison of two techniques

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare two commonly used methods for percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) in critically ill patients.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, clinical trial.

SETTING

Trauma and general intensive care units of a university tertiary teaching hospital, which is also a level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

One hundred critically ill patients with an indication for PDT.

INTERVENTIONS

PDT with the Ciaglia technique using the Ciaglia PDT introducer set and the Griggs technique using a Griggs PDT kit and guidewire dilating forceps.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Surgical time, difficulties, and surgical and anesthesia complications were measured at 0-2 hrs, 24 hrs, and 7 days postprocedure. Groups were well matched, and there were no differences between the two methods in surgical time or in anesthesia complications. Major bleeding complications were 4.4 times more frequent with the Griggs PDT kit. With the Ciaglia PDT kit, both intraoperative and at 2 and 24 hrs, surgical complications were less common (p = .023) and the procedure was more often completed without expert assistance (p = .013). Tracheostomy bleeding was not associated with either anticoagulant therapy or an abnormal clotting profile. Multivariate analysis identified the predictors of PDT complications as the Griggs PDT kit (p = .027) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (p = .041). The significant predictors of time required to complete PDT were the APACHE II score (p = .041), a less experienced operator (p = .0001), and a female patient (p = .013).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients experiencing PDT with the Ciaglia PDT kit had a lower surgical complication rate (2% vs. 25%), less operative and postoperative bleeding, and less overall technical difficulties than did patients undergoing PDT with the Griggs PDT kit. Ciaglia PDT is, therefore, the preferred technique for percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patients.

Dilatational versus standard tracheostomy: a meta-analysis

The advent of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) was initially viewed by otolaryngologists with great skepticism. The purpose of this study was to compare the complications of PDT with those of standard tracheostomy (ST) by a meta-analysis of randomized studies. We found that ST had a fivefold higher rate of complications than did PDT, and these complications were often more severe. We conclude that PDT is a safer procedure for elective tracheostomy in carefully selected patients, ie, those with normal-sized necks.

Light-guided tracheal puncture for percutaneous tracheostomy

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness of lightwand-guided tracheal puncture for percutaneous tracheostomy.

METHODS

The desired puncture site was marked on the skin of the anterior neck. A lightwand (Trachlight) was inserted into the patient's endotracheal tube (ETT), so that the number indicator on the lightwand matched the number indicator of the ETT of the patient. At this position, the light bulb of the lightwand was exactly placed at the tip of the endotracheal tube. With the lightwand turned on, the lightwand together with the endotracheal tube (ETT-LW) was slowly withdrawn from the trachea until a bright glow in the anterior neck could be seen 1 cm above the marked puncture site. At this position, the tip of the ETT was 1 cm above the puncture site.

RESULTS

Percutaneous tracheostomy via a light-guided tracheal puncture was performed on 11 neurosurgical patients. The withdrawal of the endotracheal tube to a location above the puncture was accomplished easily with the lightwand. All percutaneous tracheostomies performed were successful, with ease and without any complications. The procedure time was 17.8 +/- 5.3 min. Mechanical ventilation was not interrupted during the whole procedure.

CONCLUSION

The lightwand guided intratracheal puncture for percutaneous tracheostomy is a simple, effective, and safe procedure. This technique can avoid the risk of puncturing the endotracheal tube and/or cuff, thus allowing adequate ventilation and oxygenation during the percutaneous tracheostomy. Furthermore, this technique is inexpensive and minimizes the risk of damaging equipment like the fibreoptic bronchoscope.

When and how should we do a tracheostomy?

Tracheostomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in the intensive care unit. Since the introduction of percutaneous techniques, tracheostomy has become increasingly popular. The technique is relatively easy, and the early and late complication rates are relatively low.It is unknown at which moment tracheostomy can best be performed in the translaryngeally intubated patient. There are theoretic arguments for both early and late tracheostomy. The excellent results of percutaneous tracheostomy may influence the decision to perform a tracheostomy rather early, but prospective randomized studies are required to gather the necessary evidence.

Endoscopically monitored percutaneous dilational tracheotomy in a residency program

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Endoscopically guided percutaneous dilational tracheotomy (PDT) has become a well-established alternative to the more traditional open tracheotomy, yet its use by otolaryngologists is limited. As airway management specialists, otolaryngologists should be familiar with a wide range of definitive procedures, including PDT. Few otolaryngology programs teach the technique. The objective of the present study was to determine the complication rate and outcome of PDT after its introduction in a residency teaching program. We also wished to evaluate whether the time savings reported by experienced surgeons could be repeated in our setting.

SETTING

Tertiary referral teaching hospital.

METHODS

We prospectively reviewed our first 54 consecutive PDTs and compared them to 29 consecutive standard open tracheotomies, which were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Complications (13% vs. 33%, P = .030), operative time (12 vs. 24 min, P < .0001) and total procedure time (37 vs. 80 min, P < .001) were significantly reduced in the PDT group as compared with standard tracheotomy. Initial outcome data were equal in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that PDT can be safely and effectively taught as part of an otolaryngology residency training program.