Effects of filter pore size on efficacy of continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration therapy for Staphylococcus aureus-induced septicemia in immature swine

Direct Comparison of Peak Bulk Flow Rate of Programmable Intermittent Epidural Bolus and Manual Epidural Bolus Using a Closed-End Multiorifice Catheter: An Experimental Study

BACKGROUND

The programmable intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) has been popularized as the optimal delivery technique for labor analgesia. Suggested advantages of this method are less local anesthetic consumption, improved maternal satisfaction, potentially shorter duration of labor, and decreased workload requirements for the anesthesia providers. However, a manual bolus is still routinely used for breakthrough pain when the PIEB is underperforming.

METHODS

We conducted a laboratory-based study to quantify the flow through a multiorifice epidural catheter using the PIEB setting on an epidural pump compared to the manual epidural bolus. Four syringe volumes, 3, 5, 10, and 20 mL, were selected for this experiment. The flow in a manual bolus was also studied with and without the presence of an epidural catheter filter. A generalized estimating equation analysis was done to compare data between the groups.

RESULTS

Regardless of the syringe size, there was a several-fold increase in flow when a manual bolus was used compared to a pump-administered dose, with the highest difference in the peak flow rate observed in 3-mL boluses with up to a 12-fold difference, while the difference was, at most, 7-fold in 5-mL and 10-mL boluses. Manual boluses without a filter achieve a mean peak flow rate higher than manual boluses with a filter.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that manual boluses produced a higher flow rate compared to the CADD-Solis epidural pump (Smiths Medical). This study also found that the placement of a particulate filter reduces the flow rates generated while bolusing. Bulk flow rate is directly correlated with induced pressure and solution spread. Because higher bolus pressure has been shown to provide a more efficient distribution of local anesthetic and more efficient pain relief, these results may have impactful clinical significance and will pave the way for future studies.

Role of Therapeutic Plasmapheresis in SARS-CoV-2 Induced Cytokine Release Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study on COVID-19 Patients

Background

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) significantly contributes to the pathophysiology and progression of COVID-19. It is speculated that therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) can dampen CRS via elimination of pathogenic cytokines.

Objectives

The study is intended to compare the outcomes of COVID-19 patients with CRS treated with TPE and standard care (SC) to their counterparts receiving SC alone.

Methodology

A retrospective cohort study of severe COVID-19 confirmed patients presenting with CRS and admitted to the medical ICU was conducted between March and August 2021. Using case-control (CC) matching 1:1, 162 patients were selected and divided into two equal groups. The primary outcome was 28-day in-hospital survival analysis in severe COVID-19 patients with CRS. However, secondary outcomes included the effect of plasmapheresis on inflammatory markers, the need for mechanical ventilation, the rate of extubation, and the duration of survival.

Results

After CC matching, the study cohort had a mean age of 55.41 (range 56.41±11.56 in TP+SC and 54.42±8.94 in SC alone; p=0.22). There were 25.95% males and 74.05% females in both groups. The mean time from first day of illness to hospitalization was 6.53±2.18 days. The majority of patients with CRS had comorbid conditions (75.9%). Diabetes mellitus was the most common comorbidity (40.1%), followed by hypertension (25.3%), and chronic kidney disease (21%). Notable reduction in some inflammatory markers (D-dimers, LDH, CRP and serum ferritin) (p<0.0001) was observed in the group that received TPE+SC. Moreover, the patients in the plasmapheresis plus standard care group required relatively less mechanical ventilation as compared to the group receiving SC alone (46.9% vs 58.1%, respectively; p>0.05). The rate of extubation in the TP+SC group vs SC alone was 60.5% vs 44.7%, respectively (p>0.05). Similarly, the mortality percentages in both groups were 19.8% and 24.7%, respectively.

Conclusion

For this particular group of matched patients with COVID-19-induced CRS, TPE+SC was linked with relatively better overall survival, early extubation, and earlier discharge compared to SC alone. As these results were not statistically significant, multi-centered randomized control trials are needed to further elaborate the role of therapeutic plasmapheresis in COVID-19 induced CRS.

The role of continuous renal replacement therapy (Crrt) in Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) patients

Even without the presence of the novel Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), acute kidney injury has been a serious problem in medicine for decades, with mortality rate up to 70% among those who eventually required renal replacement therapy, and the number has not changed significantly for the last 30 years despite major advances in technology and experience. On the other hand, even without acute kidney injury, COVID-19 was a major cause of death globally in the year 2020, but the occurrence of acute kidney injury among COVID-19 patients is an independent risk factor of increased mortality. Continuous renal replacement therapy has been recommended to treat acute kidney injury in COVID-19 patients instead of conventional intermittent hemodialysis. Moreover, its use might have another beneficial role in stopping the progression of severe COVID-19 by removing pro-inflammatory cytokines during cytokine storm syndrome, which is postulated as the pathophysiology behind severe and critically severe cases of COVID-19. This review will cover a brief history of continuous renal replacement therapy and its modalities, before digging up more into its use in COVID-19 patients, including the optimum filtration dose and timing, membrane filtration used, vascular access, anticoagulation therapy, and drug dosing adjustment during continuous renal replacement therapy.

Therapeutic plasma exchange for coronavirus disease-2019 triggered cytokine release syndrome; a retrospective propensity matched control study

BACKGROUND

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology and progression of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) by removing the pathogenic cytokines is hypothesized to dampen CRS.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of the patients with COVID-19 having CRS being treated with TPE compared to controls on the standard of care.

METHODOLOGY

Retrospective propensity score-matched analysis in a single centre from 1st April to 31st July 2020. We retrospectively analyzed data of 280 hospitalized patients developing CRS initially. PSM was used to minimize bias from non-randomized treatment assignment. Using PSM 1:1, 90 patients were selected and assigned to 2 equal groups. Forced matching was done for disease severity, routine standard care and advanced supportive care. Many other Co-variates were matched. Primary outcome was 28 days overall survival. Secondary outcomes were duration of hospitalization, CRS resolution time and timing of viral clearance on Polymerase chain reaction testing.

RESULTS

After PS-matching, the selected cohort had a median age of 60 years (range 32-73 in TPE, 37-75 in controls), p = 0.325 and all were males. Median symptoms duration was 7 days (range 3-22 days' TPE and 3-20 days controls), p = 0.266. Disease severity in both groups was 6 (6.6%) moderate, 40 (44.4%) severe and 44 (49%) critical. Overall, 28-day survival was significantly superior in the TPE group (91.1%), 95% CI 78.33-97.76; as compared to PS-matched controls (61.5%), 95% CI 51.29-78.76 (log rank 0.002), p<0.001. Median duration of hospitalization was significantly reduced in the TPE treated group (10 days vs 15 days) (p< 0.01). CRS resolution time was also significantly reduced in the TPE group (6 days vs. 12 days) (p< 0.001). In 71 patients who underwent TPE, the mortality was 0 (n = 43) if TPE was done within the first 12 days of illness while it was 17.9% (deaths 5, n = 28 who received it after 12th day (p = 0.0045).

CONCLUSION

An earlier use of TPE was associated with improved overall survival, early CRS resolution and time to discharge compared to SOC for COVID-19 triggered CRS in this selected cohort of PS-matched male patients from one major hospital in Pakistan.

The Big Bang of Hemofiltration: The Beginning of a New Era in the Third Millennium for Extra-Corporeal Blood Purification!

Since the last decade, hemofiltration and especially high volume hemofiltration has rapidly evolved from a somewhat experimental treatment towards a potentially effective “adjunctive” therapy in severe septic shock and especially refractory or catecholamine resistant hypodynamic septic shock. Nevertheless, this approach lacks prospective randomized studies (PRT'S) evaluating the critical role of early hemofiltration in sepsis. An important step forward which could be called the “big bang” in term of hemofiltration was the publication of a PRT in patients with acute renal failure (ARF) (1). Before this study (2), nobody believed that hemofiltration could change the survival rate in intensive care. Since that big bang, many physicians consider that hemofiltration at a certain dose can change the survival rate in intensive care. So the world of hemofiltration in ICU is not a definitive world, it is still in expansion. Indeed, we now have to try to define what will be the exact dose we need in septic acute renal failure. This dose might well be “higher” than 35 ml/kg/hour in the septic acute renal failure “group” as suggested by many studies (2–5). At present, it is the issue of continuous dose of high volume hemofiltration that has to be tested in future randomized studies. Since the Vicenza study (2) has shown that 35 ml/kg/h is the best dose in terms of survival, dealing with non septic acute renal failure in ICU, several studies from different groups have shown that, in septic acute renal failure, a higher dose might correlate with better survival. This has also been shown in some way by the study of the “Vicenza group” but not with a statistically significant value (2). New PRT'S have just started in Europe like the IVOIRE study (hIgh VOlume in Intensive caRE) (6) and the RENAL study. Another large study is looking more basically at dose in non septic acute renal failure in Australasia and is led by the group of Rinaldo Bellomo in Melbourne (7) as well as the ATN study (8) led by Palevsky and colleagues in the USA, also testing the importance of dose in the treatment for ARF. Nevertheless, “early goal-directed hemofiltration therapy” like early goal directed therapy (9) has to be studied in our critical ill patients. Regarding this issue, fewer studies, mainly retrospective exist, but again the IVOIRE study (6) will address this issue by studying septic patients with acute renal injury according to the Rifle classification (10). So, this review focuses on the early application and on the adequate dose of continuous high volume hemofiltration in septic shock in order to improve not only hemodynamics, but survival in this very severely ill cohort of patients. This could well be called the “big bang of hemofiltration” as one could never have anticipated that an adequate dose of hemofiltration could markedly influence the survival rate of ICU-septic acute renal failure patients. On top of the use of early and adequate dose of hemofiltration in sepsis, a higher dose could also provide better renal recovery rate and reduce the risk of associate chronic dialysis in these patients. Furthermore, this paper also reviews “brand” new theories regarding the rationale for hemofiltration in sepsis. Finally, this paper also addresses the so-called negative studies as well anticipated side effects.

Confirmation of High Cytokine Clearance by Hemofiltration with a Cellulose Triacetate Membrane with Large Pores: An in vivo Study

Objective

To confirm in vivo the hypothesis that hemofiltration with a large pore membrane can achieve significant cytokine clearance.

Method

We used a well-known animal model of endotoxinic shock (0.5 mg/kg of lipopolysaccharide from Escherichia Coli over a period of 30 mins). Six pigs were hemofiltrated for 3 hours with a large pore membrane (78 Å pore, 80 kDa cut off) (Sureflux FH 70, Nipro, Osaka, Japan). The ultrafiltration rate was 45 ml/kg/min. Samples were taken from arterial, venous line and in the ultrafiltrate at T120 and T240. We measured concentrations of interleukin 6, interleukin 10 and albumin.

Results

At T120 and T240, the IL-6 clearances were 22 ± 7 and 15 ± 3 ml/min, respectively. The IL-6 sieving coefficients were 0.97 and 0.7 at T120 and T240, respectively. At T120 and T240, the IL-10 clearances were 14 ± 4 and 10 ± 7 ml/min, respectively. The sieving coefficients were 0.63 and 0.45 at T120 and T240, respectively. The concentrations of IL-6 and IL-10 were the same at T0 and T240. At T60 and T240, the plasmatic albumin concentrations were 24 ± 4 g/L and 23 ± 4 g/L, respectively (p = 0.13).

Conclusions

In this animal model of endotoxinic shock, we confirm the high cytokine clearance observed when hemofiltration is applied to a large pore membrane. The loss of albumin seems negligible. The impact of such clearances on hemodynamic stability and survival remains to be proved.

Super High Flux Hemodialysis at High Dialysate Flows: An Ex Vivo Assessment

Background and objectives

The removal of cytokines by standard hemofiltration is limited. Super high flux membranes may significantly improve removal even when used in dialysis mode. We sought to measure cytokine clearance using a large surface super high-flux membrane and a standard hemodialysis setting.

Setting

ICU laboratory of a tertiary institution.

Subjects

Six healthy volunteers.

Methods

Blood form healthy volunteers was incubated for 4 hours with E. coli endotoxin to stimulate cytokine production. Cytokine containing blood was then circulated through a dialysis circuit at 3 different dialysate flow rates. Blood and dialysate were sampled for cytokine and albumin measurements and calculation of clearances.

Results

Super high-flux dialysis achieved high median cytokine clearances (IL-1 clearance of 106 ml/min, IL-6 clearance of 66.8 ml/min, IL-8 clearance of 61.7 ml/min and TNF clearance of 36.1 ml/min). Increasing dialysate flow rate from 300 to 500 ml/min did not significantly increase cytokine clearances. Albumin clearances however were between 2.7 and 5.4 ml/min.

Conclusions

Cytokine dialysis is feasible at high dialysate flow rates yielding high cytokine clearances. Albumin loss, however, is appreciable and may require separate supplementation in the clinical setting.

Extracorporeal Blood Treatment (EBT) Methods in SIRS/Sepsis

Background

Extracorporeal blood purification treatment (EBT) methods have been used in the treatment of experimental and human SIRS/Sepsis in a variety of settings and with variable reports of efficacy and safety. Their role in the management of SIRS/Sepsis remains controversial.

Objectives

To develop consensus statements regarding important aspects of research, practice and technical management concerning EBT.

Methods

Systematic review of published study. Evidence-based grading of information available. Consensus development regarding fundamental questions about EBT.

Results

Consensus was achieved on all questions posed during the conference. It was agreed that there is currently a clear biological rational for EBT in SIRS and Sepsis. It was agreed that conventional CVVH has sufficiently been shown not to be effective in SIRS/Sepsis in the absence of concomitant ARF and that other therapies such as plasmapheresis or high-volume hemofiltration or coupled plasma filtration adsorption appear more promising and should be tested in multicentre randomized controlled trials. Patients with ARF and SIRS/Sepsis should be treated differently from those with ARF alone even though current practice in this field is not well known. Patients with refractory septic shock should be considered for EBT. Appropriate end points for clinical trials can be defined and chosen according to the goals of the trial. Different technologies exist for EBT and better understanding of the merits and safety of each is needed as well as better standardization of methodology and dose.

Conclusions

Broad consensus can be achieved on several aspects of EBT and can be used to inform clinical practice and to help guide the establishment of a future research agenda.

High Cut-off Point Membranes in Septic Acute Renal Failure: A Systematic Review

Objectives

To review the literature on the experimental, physiological and clinical effects of blood purification with high cut-off (HCO) point membranes in septic acute renal failure (ARF).

Study Design

MEDLINE and PubMed database search combining relevant terms and integrating data from studies on the use of HCO membranes.

Setting and Population

Ex vivo studies of endotoxemia, animal studies of bacteremia and clinical studies using HCO membranes in patients with septic ARF. Selection Criteria for Studies: Original data from primary publications. Interventions: HCO membrane-based hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration or hemofiltration. Outcomes: Plasma cytokine clearance, immunological and physiological effects and safety parameters of HCO membranes.

Results

HCO membranes effectively remove cytokines from blood. Treatment using HCO membranes has beneficial effects on immune cell function and increases survival in animal models of sepsis. Preliminary clinical studies show that HCO membranes decrease plasma cytokine levels and the need for vasopressor therapy. HCO membrane-based blood purification has now been applied in four pilot randomized controlled studies of 70 patients with septic ARF with no reports of serious adverse effects.

Limitations

Because of substantial heterogeneity, no formal quantitative analysis could be performed.

Conclusions

The available evidence on HCO blood purification justifies larger randomized controlled trials in patients with septic ARF.

Plasmadiafiltration ameliorating gut mucosal barrier dysfunction and improving survival in porcine sepsis models

BACKGROUND

The object of this study is to explore whether the plasmadiafiltration (PDF) is more effective in improving the intestinal mucosal barrier function by removing more key large molecular inflammatory mediators and then prolonging the survival time.

METHODS

Totally, 24 porcine sepsis models induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) operation were randomly divided into three groups: PDF group, high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) group, and control group, and received 8 h treatment, respectively. The expression of ZO-1 and occludin in intestinal mucosal epithelial cells were detected by immunohistochemistry, and apoptotic protein caspase-3-positive lymphocytes were signed in mesenteric lymph nodes by TUNEL staining. The hemodynamic parameters were measured by invasive cavity detection. The tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and high-mobility group protein 1 (HMGB1) were tested by ELISA method. And then, the survival curves with all-cause death were compared with three groups.

RESULTS

PDF led to a superior reversal of sepsis-related hemodynamic impairment and serum biochemistry abnormalities and resulted in longer survival time compared with HVHF and control (p < 0.01). Definitive protection from excessive TNF-α and HMGB1 response were only achieved by PDF. A more regular distribution pattern of ZO-1 and occludin along the epithelium was found in PDF animals (p < 0.01). The presence of apoptotic lymphocytes was significantly reduced in the PDF animals (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PDF can effectively eliminate more pivotal inflammatory mediators of TNFα and HMGB1 and reduce the inflammation damage of the intestinal mucosal barrier and apoptosis of lymphocyte then improve the circulation function and prolong the survival time.

Renal Replacement Therapy

During the last few years, due to medical and surgical evolution, patients with increasingly severe diseases causing multiorgan dysfunction are frequently admitted to intensive care units. Therapeutic options, when organ failure occurs, are frequently nonspecific and mostly directed towards supporting vital function. In these scenarios, the kidneys are almost always involved and, therefore, renal replacement therapies have become a common routine practice in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Recent technological improvement has led to the production of safe, versatile and efficient dialysis machines. In addition, emerging evidence may allow better individualization of treatment with tailored prescription depending on the patients' clinical picture (e.g. sepsis, fluid overload, pediatric). The aim of the present review is to give a general overview of current practice in renal replacement therapies for critically ill patients. The main clinical aspects, including dose prescription, modality of dialysis delivery, anticoagulation strategies and timing will be addressed. In addition, some technical issues on physical principles governing blood purification, filters characteristics, and vascular access, will be covered. Finally, a section on current standard nomenclature of renal replacement therapy is devoted to clarify the "Tower of Babel" of critical care nephrology.

Extracorporeal renal replacement therapies in the treatment of sepsis: where are we?

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common among the critically ill, affecting approximately 40% of patients. Sepsis is the cause of AKI in almost 50% of cases of intensive care patients, however, any evidence-based treatment for sepsis-associated AKI is lacking. Furthermore, the underlying pathophysiology of septic AKI is inadequately understood given the disparity between severe functional changes and limited tubular injury. What is clear is that within this complex interplay leading to septic AKI, the inflammatory response plays a pivotal role and hence modulation of this response may translate to improved outcomes. We outline the use of extracorporeal therapies in the treatment of sepsis and septic AKI. We consider the classic aspects of extracorporeal renal replacement therapy including indications, timing, and delivered dose. The various techniques that currently are used to try and achieve immune homeostasis also are outlined. As well as discussing the evidence accumulated to date, we also suggest possibilities for the future treatment of our patients.

Clinical review: blood purification for sepsis

Sepsis is the primary cause of death in the intensive care unit. Extracorporeal blood purification therapies have been proposed for patients with sepsis in order to improve outcomes since these therapies can alter the host inflammatory response by non-selective removal of inflammatory mediators or bacterial products or both. Recent technological progress has increased the number of techniques available for blood purification and their performance. In this overview, we report on the latest advances in blood purification for sepsis and how they relate to current concepts of disease, and we review the current evidence for high-volume hemofiltration, cascade hemofiltration, hemoadsorption, coupled plasma filtration adsorption, high-adsorption hemofiltration, and high-cutoff hemofiltration/hemodialysis. Promising results have been reported with all of these blood purification therapies, showing that they are well tolerated, effective in clearing inflammatory mediators or bacterial toxins (or both) from the plasma, and efficacious for improvement of various physiologic outcomes (for example, hemodynamics and oxygenation). However, numerous questions, including the timing, duration, and frequency of these therapies in the clinical setting, remain unanswered. Large multicenter trials evaluating the ability of these therapies to improve clinical outcomes (that is, mortality or organ failure), rather than surrogate markers such as plasma mediator clearance or transient improvement in physiologic variables, are required to define the precise role of blood purification in the management of sepsis.

Extracorporeal cell therapy with granulocytes in a pig model of Gram-positive sepsis

OBJECTIVES

Granulocyte transfusions have been used to treat immune cell dysfunction in sepsis. As granulocyte transfusions can trigger tissue injury via local effects of neutrophils, we hypothesized that extracorporeal treatment of plasma using granulocytes would prove beneficial while having less side effects.

DESIGN

Prospective controlled three-armed animal study.

SETTING

Research laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-one female immature pigs (7.5-12 kg, 7-9 weeks old).

INTERVENTIONS

Three groups of spontaneously breathing, sedated pigs (n = 7 each) received an intravenous lethal dose of live Staphylococcus aureus over 1 hour. Although group I had no specific treatment (control), group II and III were subsequently treated for 4 hours with an extracorporeal device containing either no cells (sham control, group II) or human cell line-derived granulocytic cells (group III). Survival time and physiologic, biochemical, and hematologic parameters were monitored for 7 days.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All animals of group I died during the observation time (mean survival time: 70 hours). In group II, two of seven and in group III, six of seven animals survived the observation time (mean survival: 75 and 168 hours, respectively). Survival differences were significant between group I and III (p < 0.001) and between group II and III (p < 0.05) but not between group I and II (p = 0.43). Furthermore, group differences in bacterial blood concentrations, differential blood count, blood gases, lactate, and interleukins were observed. The extracorporeal cell treatment was well tolerated by the animals.

CONCLUSIONS

Extracorporeal therapy with granulocytic cells significantly improved survival in a pig model of sepsis. Further studies with this approach are encouraged.

Potential interventions in sepsis-related acute kidney injury

Sepsis is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Acute kidney injury often complicates sepsis, leading to greater complexity, cost of care, and worsening prognosis. In recent years, a consensus definition of acute kidney injury has been developed, facilitating research into the pathophysiology and epidemiology of this disorder. New and emerging biomarkers to recognize kidney injury before functional abnormalities are manifest may allow early recognition and facilitate prevention or treatment. Furthermore, advances in the clinical management of sepsis may have secondary benefits with respect to renal outcomes. Existing and hybrid extracorporeal therapies are being investigated not only as means to replace lost kidney function but also to modulate the immune response to sepsis. For those who have more advanced forms of kidney injury, strategies to promote renal recovery are being sought to minimize the long-term consequences of impaired kidney function. This review provides an update on the current state of the science and a glimpse toward the future of intervention in sepsis-related acute kidney injury.

Extracorporeal blood purification in sepsis and sepsis-related acute kidney injury

Sepsis-related acute kidney injury (AKI) is an important complicating feature of sepsis, and is associated with greater complexity of care and higher mortality. Until recently, AKI lacked a standard, widely accepted definition, rendering it difficult to compare previously published strategies to prevent, recognize and treat this entity. Recently, the RIFLE classification of AKI has been developed, and confirmed in observational studies to be associated with subsequent morbidity and mortality. The management of sepsis-related AKI is evolving with new basic discoveries and ongoing translational clinical research, and will likely include nephroprotective strategies to protect kidneys in patients at risk, early recognition and amelioration of renal damage and pharmacological interventions to minimize injury and promote recovery. Furthermore, extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) has an important role to play, not only in the replacement of certain aspects of renal organ function such as acid-base/electrolyte homeostasis and extracellular fluid volume, but also in an immunomodulatory fashion. As a therapy that has the potential to influence the course of disease in sepsis, EBP in sepsis and sepsis-related AKI is the subject of this review.

Hemodialysis membrane with a high-molecular-weight cutoff and cytokine levels in sepsis complicated by acute renal failure: a phase 1 randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is the leading cause of acute renal failure. Intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) is a common treatment for patients with acute renal failure. However, standard hemodialysis membranes achieve only little diffusive removal of circulating cytokines. Modified membranes may enable both successful IHD treatment and simultaneous diffusive cytokine removal.

STUDY DESIGN

Double-blind, crossover, randomized, controlled, phase 1 trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Tertiary intensive care unit. 10 septic patients with acute renal failure according to RIFLE class F.

INTERVENTION

Each patient was treated with 4 hours of high-cutoff (HCO)-IHD and 4 hours of high-flux (HF)-IHD.

OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS

We chose relative change in plasma interleukin 6 (IL-6) concentrations from baseline to 4 hours as the primary outcome for effective cytokine removal. We measured plasma and effluent concentrations of cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-18) and albumin.

RESULTS

Median age was 53 years (25(th) to 75(th) percentiles, 43 to 71 years). Both treatments achieved equal control of uremia. Four hours of HCO-IHD accomplished a greater decrease in plasma IL-6 levels (-30.3%) than 4 hours of HF-IHD (1.1%; P = 0.05). HCO-IHD, but not HF-IHD, achieved substantial diffusive clearance of several cytokines (IL-6, 14.1 mL/min; IL-8, 75.2 mL/min; and IL-10, 25.5 mL/min). Such clearance also was associated with greater relative decreases in plasma IL-8 and IL-10 levels in favor of HCO-IHD (P = 0.02, P = 0.04). We found significantly greater relative changes from prefilter to postfilter plasma IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 values in favor of HCO-IHD (P = 0.02, P = 0.01, P < 0.01). During HCO-IHD, cumulative albumin loss into the effluent was 7.7 g (25(th) to 75(th) percentiles, 4.8 to 19.6) versus less than 1.0 g for HF-IHD (P < 0.01).

LIMITATIONS

Small phase 1 trial.

CONCLUSION

In septic patients with acute renal failure, HCO-IHD achieved simultaneous uremic control and diffusive cytokine clearances and a greater relative decrease in plasma cytokine concentrations than standard HF-IHD.

Hemofiltration in sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome: the role of dosing and timing

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of hemofiltration (HF) as an adjunctive treatment of sepsis or the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in critically ill patients is a subject of severe debate. Firm conclusions on this subject are hampered by the heterogeneity in study populations and HF treatments, and the lack of adequately sized randomized controlled clinical trials. The aim of this review was to determine the importance of ultrafiltration dose and timing on the physiologic and clinical effects of HF in sepsis and SIRS. In addition, we discuss the issue of filter pore size.

METHODS

Literature search was done in Embase and PubMed database for animal and human studies.

RESULTS

Animal studies suggest beneficial effects of HF on hemodynamics; gas exchange; sepsis-induced immunoparalysis; histology of gut, lung, and kidney; and (short-term) survival. These effects were more prominent with "very high" ultrafiltrate rates (> or =100 mL/kg per hour) and early initiation of HF (ie, before or very early after the septic challenge). Three small randomized studies and 3 observational studies in patients with sepsis or SIRS show beneficial effects of short-term or pulse HF using very high ultrafiltrate rates and/or early initiation of HF on physiologic endpoints and survival. However, the studies were underpowered for survival. The first observations of high permeability HF (pore size, about 10 nm; in vitro cutoff, 100 kd) are promising, but so far, it has not been sufficiently examined to allow strong conclusions.

CONCLUSION

Human and animal studies suggest that early initiation and high ultrafiltrate volumes are determinants of the beneficial physiologic and clinical effect of HF in sepsis and SIRS. As yet, the evidence in humans is too low to recommend HF as an adjunctive therapy for critically ill patients with sepsis or SIRS. Regarding the many uncertainties about optimal volume (high or very high) and type of membrane, clinical studies should first focus on endpoints as recovery from organ failure and length of treatment before survival studies are started.

Current status of dosing and quantification of acute renal replacement therapy. Part 2: dosing paradigms and clinical implementation

The dosing and quantification of acute renal replacement therapy has emerged as one of the most pressing issues in the management of critically-ill patients with acute kidney injury. Although there is ongoing debate as to the best marker of uraemic injury in this setting, several landmark studies have identified clearance-related expressions of acute renal replacement therapy dose as important determinants of survival. Part 1 of this review examined the factors affecting the delivery of prescribed acute renal replacement therapy dose. Part 2 summarises and contextualises findings from recent dose-outcome studies, and reviews clinical tools to assist in the prescription and quantification of acute renal replacement therapy dose.

Pilot study on the effects of high cutoff hemofiltration on the need for norepinephrine in septic patients with acute renal failure

OBJECTIVE

High cutoff hemofilters are characterized by an increased effective pore size designed to facilitate the elimination of inflammatory mediators in sepsis. Clinical data on this new renal replacement modality are lacking.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

University hospital, intensive care units.

PATIENTS

: Thirty patients with sepsis-induced acute renal failure.

INTERVENTION

Patients were allocated to high cutoff (n = 20) or conventional (n = 10) hemofiltration in a 2:1 ratio. Median renal replacement dose was 31 mL/kg/hr. For high cutoff hemofiltration, a high-flux hemofilter with an in vivo cutoff point of approximately 60 kilodaltons was used. Conventional hemofiltration was performed with a standard high-flux hemofilter (PF11S). The impacts of high cutoff hemofiltration on the need for norepinephrine and on plasma levels and clearance rates for interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) were analyzed. Absolute values, but also adjusted values (expressed as proportion of baseline), were analyzed. The observation period was restricted to 48 hrs.

MAIN RESULTS

Apart from higher antithrombin III levels at entry into the study, main clinical and laboratory parameters were comparable between both groups. The median norepinephrine dose at entry into the study was 0.30 microg/kg/min in the high cutoff group and 0.21 microg/kg/min in the conventional hemofiltration group (p = .448). Only the high cutoff group showed a significant decline (p = .0002) in "adjusted" norepinephrine dose over time. Clearance rates for IL-6 and IL-1ra were significantly higher in the high cutoff hemofiltration group (p < .0001), which translated into a significant decline of the corresponding plasma levels (p = .0465 for IL-6; p = .0293 for IL-1ra).

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, high cutoff hemofiltration has been shown to exert a beneficial effect on the need for norepinephrine in septic patients with acute renal failure. In addition, we demonstrate that high cutoff hemofiltration is superior to conventional hemofiltration in the elimination of IL-6 and IL-1ra from the circulating blood of septic patients.

Large-Pore Membrane Hemofiltration Increases Cytokine Clearance and Improves Right Ventricular-Vascular Coupling During Endotoxic Shock in Pigs

Hemodynamic improvement in patients suffering from both septic shock and renal failure who received hemofiltration suggested that an extrarenal epuration technique could be of interest in patients with septic shock alone. However, most of the studies using continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in this setting evidenced neither cytokine clearance nor significant reduction in their plasma level. Lack of significant clearance was explained in part by the small size of the membrane pores. Therefore, we investigated the effects of large-pore membrane hemofiltration (LPHF) during endotoxic shock in pigs on interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 10 (IL-10) clearances, and on right ventricular (RV)-vascular coupling. Thirteen anesthetized healthy pigs weighing 20-30 kg were divided into two groups. In the Endo group (n = 6), the pigs received a 0.5-mg/kg endotoxin infusion over a period of 30 mins from T0 to T30. In the EndoHF group (n = 7), LPHF (cutoff = 80 kDa) and an ultrafiltration rate of 45 mL/kg/h were started 30 mins after the end of the endotoxin infusion, from T60 to T240. In this model of porcine endotoxic shock, LPHF was responsible for a significant clearance of IL-6 (20 mL/min) and Il-10 (14 mL/min), and for an improvement in RV-vascular coupling.

Extracorporeal therapies in non-renal disease: treatment of sepsis and the peak concentration hypothesis

In the setting of intensive care, patients with acute renal failure often present a clinical picture of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). SIRS can be caused by bacterial stimuli or by non-microbiological stimuli that induce a significant inflammatory response. When this response is exaggerated, the patient experiences multiple organ system failure and a condition of sepsis also defined as a systemic malignant inflammation. This is mostly characterized by an invasion of cytokines and other pro-inflammatory mediators into the systemic circulation where major biological effects take place, including vasopermeabilization, hypotension and shock. At the same time, the monocyte of the septic patient seems to be hyporesponsive to inflammatory stimuli to a certain extent. In this condition, the patient faces a situation of hyperinflammation but at the same time of immunodepression expressing a clinical entity defined as counter anti-inflammatory response syndrome. The general picture of the clinical disorder is therefore better characterized by an immunodysregulation than by a simple pro- or anti-inflammatory disorder. Due to the short half-life of cytokines and other mediators spilled over into the circulation, it is extremely difficult to approach the problem at the right moment with the right pharmacological agent. For these reasons, the peak concentration hypothesis suggests that continuous renal replacement therapies, due to their continuity and unspecific capacity of removal, might be beneficial in cutting the peaks of the concentrations of both pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators, restoring a situation of immunohomeostasis. Thus the patient may benefit from a lesser degree of immunodysregulation and he/she may restore a close-to-normal capacity of response to exogenous stimuli.

Renal replacement therapy with high-cutoff hemofilters: Impact of convection and diffusion on cytokine clearances and protein status

BACKGROUND

High-cutoff hemofilters are characterized by an increased effective pore size designed to facilitate the elimination of inflammatory mediators in sepsis. This study compares diffusive versus convective high-cutoff renal replacement therapy (RRT) in terms of cytokine clearance rates and effects on plasma protein levels.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with sepsis-induced acute renal failure were studied. A polyflux hemofilter with a cutoff point of approximately 60 kd was used for RRT. Patients were randomly allocated to either continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) with an ultrafiltration rate of 1 L/h (group 1) or 2.5 L/h (group 2) or continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) with a dialysate flow rate of 1 L/h (group 3) or 2.5 L/h (group 4). Interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), IL-1beta, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and plasma proteins were measured daily.

RESULTS

CVVH achieved significantly greater IL-1ra clearance compared with CVVHD (P = 0.0003). No difference was found for IL-6 (P = 0.935). Increasing ultrafiltration volume or dialysate flow led to a highly significant increase in IL-1ra and IL-6 clearance rates (P < 0.00001). Peak clearances were 46 mL/min for IL-1ra and 51 mL/min for IL-6. TNF-alpha clearance was poor for both RRT modalities. A significant decline in plasma IL-1ra and IL-6 clearance was observed in patients with high baseline levels. Protein and albumin losses were greatest during the 2.5-L/h hemofiltration mode.

CONCLUSION

High-cutoff RRT is a novel strategy to clear cytokines more effectively. Convection has an advantage over diffusion in the clearance capacity of IL-1ra, but is associated with greater plasma protein losses.

Cytokine removal in septic patients with continuous venovenous hemofiltration

Despite the progress that has been made in intensive care medicine, multiple organ failure is still associated with high mortality. Apart from the prevention of infectious complications, numerous efforts are being made to improve the treatment of sepsis through adequate antibiotic therapy, the development of new respirator therapies, better control of the hemodynamic situation, and adequate renal replacement therapy. Some authors advocate continuous renal replacement therapy not only for acute renal failure but also for the elimination of inflammatory molecules such as cytokines. Continuous renal replacement therapy improves the cardiovascular hemodynamics in patients with multiple organ failure. Therapeutic options such as volume control, clearance of uremic toxins, correction of acid base disturbances and temperature control are improved. Suitable renal replacement therapy improves not only cardiovascular hemodynamics but also patient survival. In current practice, continuous renal replacement therapy is not used to eliminate mediators such as cytokines. In patients with multiple organ failure and compromised cardiovascular hemodynamics, renal replacement therapy should be carried out as early as possible. In the following review, experimental and clinical findings concerning mediator elimination by continuous and intermittent renal replacement therapy are summarized.

Blood purification in non-renal critical illness

Extracorporeal therapies designed to remove substances from the circulation now include hemodialysis, hemofiltration, hemoadsorption, plasma filtration, cell-based therapies and combinations of any of the above. In recent years, there have been considerable advances in our understanding and technical capabilities, but consensus over the optimal way, and under what conditions to use these therapies does not exist. Consequently, we have initiated a series of conferences under the auspices of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI). ADQI aims at establishing an evidence-based appraisal and set of consensus recommendations to standardize care and direct further research. The results of previous consensus conferences are available on-line at www.ADQI.net. ADQI conferences have focused on research and management of renal disease. However, extracorporeal therapies are being used or investigated in the management of many other disease processes including systemic inflammation, liver disease, cardiac disease and thrombotic diseases.

High permeability haemofiltration improves peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferation in septic patients with acute renal failure

BACKGROUND

Continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (HF) with high permeability (HP) haemofilters is a novel approach in the adjuvant therapy of septic patients. HP haemofilters are characterized by an increased pore size which facilitates the filtration of inflammatory mediators. The present study examines whether HP-HF has an impact on peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) proliferation and whether ultrafiltrate can alter PBMC function in isolates from healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Twenty-eight septic patients with acute renal failure were randomly allocated to either HP-HF or conventional HF (C-HF). HP-HF was performed with a newly developed high-flux polyamide membrane (P2SH) with a nominal cut-off point of 60 kDa. For C-HF, a high-flux polyamide haemofilter (Polyflux 11S; cut-off, 30 kDa) was used.

RESULTS

Septic patients demonstrated a significantly reduced proliferation of anti-CD3-stimulated PBMCs compared to healthy controls (P = 0.016). Initiating HF led to a restoration of the PBMC proliferation in HP-HF but not in C-HF. Exposing PBMCs isolated from healthy donors to ultrafiltrates from patients with sepsis demonstrated a significant suppressive effect of HP ultrafiltrates on the anti-CD3-stimulated PBMC proliferation (P = 0.011). Ultrafiltrate from patients with sepsis who received C-HF had no impact on PBMC proliferation.

CONCLUSION

HP-HF restores PBMC proliferation in septic patients probably by eliminating immunomodulatory mediators. HP-HF may represent a new renal replacement therapy able to modulate PBMC function in sepsis.

Intermittent high permeability hemofiltration in septic patients with acute renal failure

OBJECTIVE

High permeability hemofiltration (HP-HF) is a new renal replacement modality designed to facilitate the elimination of cytokines in sepsis. Clinical safety data on this new procedure is still lacking. This study investigates the effects of HP-HF on the protein and coagulation status as well as on cardiovascular hemodynamics in patients with septic shock. In addition, the clearance capacity for interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is analyzed.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-center pilot trial.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Sixteen patients with multiple organ failure (MOF) induced by septic shock were studied.

INTERVENTION

Patients were treated by intermittent high permeability hemofiltration (iHP-HF; nominal cut-off point: 60 kilodaltons). Intermittent HP-HF was performed over 5 days for 12 h per day and alternated with conventional hemofiltration.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Intermittent HP-HF proved to be a safe hemofiltration modality in regard to cardiovascular hemodynamics and its impact on the coagulation status. However, transmembrane protein loss occurred and cumulative 12-h protein loss was 7.60 g (IQR: 6.2-12.0). The filtration capacity for IL-6 was exceptionally high. The IL-6 sieving coefficient approximated 1 throughout the study period. The total plasma IL-6 burden, estimated by area under curve analysis, declined over time ( p<0.001 vs baseline). The TNF-alpha elimination capacity was poor.

CONCLUSIONS

High permeability hemofiltration is a new approach in the adjuvant therapy of sepsis that facilitates the elimination of cytokines. HP-HF alternating with conventional hemofiltration is well tolerated. Further studies are needed to analyze whether HP-HF is able to mitigate the course of sepsis.

Interpreting the mechanisms of continuous renal replacement therapy in sepsis: the peak concentration hypothesis

Severe sepsis and septic shock are the primary causes of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), which is the most frequent cause of death in intensive care unit patients. Many water-soluble mediators with pro- and anti-inflammatory action such as TNF, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 play a strategic role in septic syndrome. In intensive care medicine, blocking any one mediator has not led to a measurable outcome improvement in patients with sepsis. CRRT is a continuously acting therapy, which removes in a nonselective way pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators; "the peak concentration hypothesis" is the concept of cutting peaks of soluble mediators through continuous hemofiltration. Furthermore, there is evidence of increased efficacy of high-volume hemofiltration compared to conventional CVVH, and other blood purification techniques that utilize large-pore membranes or sorbent plasmafiltration are conceptually interesting.

Intermittent high-permeability hemofiltration modulates inflammatory response in septic patients with multiorgan failure

BACKGROUND/AIM

Continuous venovenous hemofiltration with high-permeability hemofilters is a novel approach in the adjuvant therapy of septic patients. High-permeability hemofilters are characterized by an increased pore size which facilitates the filtration of inflammatory mediators. The present study examines whether intermittent high-permeability hemofiltration has an immunomodulatory effect on polymorphonuclear leukocytes and mononuclear cells.

METHODS

Twenty-eight septic patients with acute renal failure were randomly allocated to either receive intermittent high-permeability or conventional hemofiltration. Intermittent high-permeability hemofiltration consisted of a daily 12-hour course of high-permeability hemofiltration alternated by conventional hemofiltration. For high-permeability hemofiltration, a newly developed high-flux polyamide membrane (P2SH) with a nominal cutoff point of 60 kD was used. For conventional hemofiltration a high-flux polyamide hemofilter (Polyflux 11S, cutoff point 30 kD) was used.

RESULTS

The polymorphonuclear leukocyte phagocytosis activity before starting hemofiltration was almost double the rate of healthy controls in both groups (p < 0.001). The phagocytosis rate decreased significantly during the course of intermittent high-permeability hemofiltration (p < 0.05), whereas the values remained unchanged in the conventional hemofiltration group. Incubation of high-permeability filtrates with blood from healthy donors resulted in a significant induction of phagocytosis (p < 0.001), whereas conventional filtrates had no phagocytosis-stimulating effects. In addition, incubation of healthy-donor mononuclear cells with high-permeability but not conventional filtrates resulted in a significant tumor necrosis factor alpha release (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intermittent high-permeability hemofiltration is a novel extracorporeal elimination modality which exhibits immunomodulatory effects on leukocytes, attenuating polymorphonuclear neutrophil phagocytosis. Further studies are necessary to elucidate whether these effects translate in a clinical improvement in patients suffering from sepsis.

TNF-alpha elimination with high cut-off haemofilters: a feasible clinical modality for septic patients?

BACKGROUND

Renal replacement therapies with high cut-off haemofilters are new approaches in the adjuvant therapy of sepsis. We analysed the cytokine elimination capacity of a newly developed polyflux high cut-off haemofilter. Different renal replacement therapies are compared and tested for their clinical feasibility.

METHODS

Blood from healthy volunteers (n=15) was incubated for 4 h with 1 mg of endotoxin and then circulated through a closed extracorporeal circuit. A newly developed polyflux haemofilter (P2SX) was used. Haemofiltration, haemodialysis and albumin dialysis were tested. IL-1ra (17 kDa), interleukin-6 (IL-6) (28 kDa), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) (51 kDa), albumin (64 kDa), creatinkinase (CK) (80 kDa) and IgG (140 kDa) were measured in blood and filtrates prior to the initiation and after 5 min, 1, 2 and 4 h.

RESULTS

Haemofiltration was superior to haemodialysis in the clearance capacity of all substances when applied in the 1 l/h ultrafiltration mode. Increasing the ultrafiltration rate/dialysate flow from 1 to 3 l/h led to a significant increase in cytokine clearances (P<0.001). At 3 l/h the differences between haemofiltration and haemodialysis vanished and both techniques achieved comparable cytokine clearances. Median clearance values ranged between 25 and 54 ml/min for interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), 23 and 42 ml/min for IL-6 and 15 and 28 ml/min for TNF-alpha. Albumin loss was highest in the haemofiltration group with albumin clearances ranging between 7 and 13 ml/min. Using diffusion instead of convection significantly reduced the loss of albumin (P<0.01 for 1 l/h, P<0.05 for 3 l/h). Albumin dialysis was able to completely inhibit albumin loss but cytokine clearance capacity was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

High cut-off haemofilters achieve high clearances for inflammatory IL-6 and TNF-alpha. Due to the high protein loss in haemofiltration, dialysis in combination with balanced protein substitution seems to be a suitable approach for clinical trials.

Acute renal failure and multiple organ dysfunction in the ICU: from renal replacement therapy (RRT) to multiple organ support therapy (MOST)

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) has evolved from the concept that we need to treat the dysfunction of a single organ (the kidney). As intensive care units have become more and more complex, it has become clear that the majority of patients with acute renal failure often have dysfunction of several other organs. In order to facilitate single organ support in this setting, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) techniques have been developed. However, CRRT has opened the door to the concept that targeting renal support as the only goal of extracorporeal blood purification may be a simplistic view of our therapeutic aims. In this article we argue that it is now time to move from the simple goal of achieving adequate renal support. The proper goal of extracorporeal blood purification in ICU should be multi-organ support therapy (MOST). We explain why MOST represents the most logical future conceptual and practical evolution of CRRT and illustrates the biological rationale, supplying animal and clinical evidence that confirms the need to move rapidly in this direction theoretically, practically and technologically.

Artificial organ treatment for multiple organ failure, acute renal failure, and sepsis: recent new trends

Sepsis remains the major cause of mortality worldwide, claiming millions of lives each year. The past decade has seen major advances in the understanding of the biological mechanisms involved in this complex process. Unfortunately, no definitive therapy yet exists that can successfully treat sepsis and its complications. At variance with targeting single mediators, therapeutic intervention aimed at the nonselective removal of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators seems a rational concept and a possible key to successful extracorporeal therapies. A further advantage may lie in the continuous nature of such therapy. With such continuous therapy, sequentially appearing peaks of systemic mediator overflow may be attenuated and persistently high plasma levels reduced. This theoretical framework is proposed as the underlying biological rationale for a series of innovative modalities in sepsis. In this editorial, we will review recent animal and human trials that lend support to this concept. We will also review the importance of treatment dose during continuous renal replacement therapy as a major factor affecting survival in critically ill patients with acute renal failure. Additionally, we will review novel information related to other blood purification techniques using large pore membranes or plasma filtration with adsorbent perfusion. Although these approaches are still in the early stages of clinical testing, they are conceptually promising and might represent an important advance.

The use of extracorporeal techniques to remove humoral factors in sepsis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is sufficient evidence of a benefit of hemofiltration or plasma filtration in sepsis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline search, search of references in articles found in Medline search, literature known to local experts.

STUDY SELECTION

Trials and reports where clinical outcome measures were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Clinically relevant information was presented.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Studies were grouped according to hemofiltration or plasma filtration and within each of these groups into animal or human studies; then they were graded from case report, through case series, nonrandomized trials, and randomized trials.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of randomized trials. The available studies show an absence of benefit for hemofiltration. Further studies are needed in plasma filtration.

The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative--part IV: membranes for CRRT

The extracorporeal membrane used in a continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for the treatment of a critically ill patient with acute renal failure (ARF) is vitally important for several reasons, including its influence on biocompatibility and filter performance. The clinical relevance of membrane-related biocompatibility markers traditionally used in chronic hemodialysis remains unclear in CRRT. Numerous approaches may be used to assess membrane and filter performance in CRRT, but no specific methodology is accepted widely at present. Although a potential benefit of certain membranes used for CRRT is adsorptive removal of inflammatory mediators, this issue has not been assessed carefully in well-designed clinical trials. These and other issues should be the subject of future clinical research efforts.

Continuous renal replacement therapy: opinions and evidence

Continuous arteriovenous haemofiltration (CAVH) is the first example of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). CAVH was first applied for the treatment of diuretic unresponsive fluid overload. Subsequently, CRRT has undergone a remarkable growth, and it is now performed with pump technology (CVVH) and via double-lumen central venous catheters. In many intensive care units, especially in Australia and in Europe, CRRT has become the dominant, if not exclusive, form of artificial renal support. Continuous haemofiltration is now used beyond the original indications of blood purification, for the treatment of certain drug intoxications, for severe cardiac failure, for volume control during, after cardiopulmonary bypass, and to decrease the toxicity of chemotherapy. Furthermore, there is strong ongoing research into its role or that of derived techniques as possible adjuvant therapies during severe sepsis. Despite its large use, the current state of CRRT is surrounded by some controversies, and an effort should be made to give a dispassionate distillation of the literature for a final common definition of what is based on opinions and what carries sufficient evidence.

Hemofiltration, adsorption, sieving and the challenge of sepsis therapy design

Circulating inflammatory mediators spilling into the circulation from sites of active inflammation are considered the source of remote tissue injury and associated organ dysfunction in sepsis. Hemofiltration has been proposed as a therapy for sepsis based on its ability to remove circulating inflammatory mediators by sieving or by adsorption, or both. Designing devices and methods for sepsis therapy will require optimization of these two mechanisms. In the present issue of Critical Care Forum, Kellum and Dishart report the relative effects of sieving and adsorption on plasma IL-6 following cecal ligation and puncture in rats. The authors conclude that hemoadsorption is the main mechanism of removal, and discuss some possible implications for filter design but hemoadsorption is well dependant on hemofiltration (the so-called hemofiltration filter adsorption/synergistic effect). It is important to recognize the limitations of conventional systems; Kellum and Dishart have extended our knowledge of hemofiltration filter adsorption, which is quite different from conventional hemoadsorption. If sepsis is a manifestation of a nonlinear dynamic control system out of control, then filtration at modest doses with a large pore filter may succeed as well as high-volume hemofiltration with a conventional cut-off filter. In the present paper, we will explore the strengths and the weaknesses of the 'Kellum and Dishart' study and discussing their findings in the light of the current available literature.

Use of human preconditioned phagocytes for extracorporeal immune support: introduction of a concept

Neutrophils are critical effector cells in humoral and innate immunity and play a vital role in phagocytosis and bacterial killing. If they and/or their specific functions are lacking, then immunoparalysis may occur, and severe diseases like systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis can take a fatal course. In this paper, we discuss the possibility of using preconditioned cells in an extracorporeal biohybrid immune support system. A human promyelocytic cell line was stimulated for different times with all-trans retinoic acid. The resulting cells displayed major signs and functions of mature neutrophilic granulocytes including oxygen radical production, phagocytosis of living and dead Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, intracellular killing, and interleukin production. The cells can be expanded to yield a sufficient cell mass, and subsequent prestimulation results in an expression of specific neutrophil functions. Extracorporeal bioreactor experiments seem to be feasible to test the benefit in immunoparalysis-associated diseases like SIRS or sepsis.