Force or finesse: maintaining functional residual capacity while practicing lung-protective ventilation

Accuracy of the end-expiratory lung volume measured by the modified nitrogen washout/washin technique: a bench study

Background

The functional residual capacity (FRC) determines the oxygenating capacity of the lung and is heavily affected in the clinical context of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nitrogen-wash-in/wash-out methods have been used to measure FRC. These methods have rarely been validated against exactly known volumes. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy and precision of the N₂ washout/washin method in measuring FRC, by comparing it with set volumes in a lung simulator.

Methods

We conducted a diagnostic bench study in the Intensive Care Unit and Radiology Department of a tertiary hospital in Switzerland. Using a fully controllable high fidelity lung simulator (TestChest®), we set the functional residual capacity at 1500 ml, 2000 ml and 2500 ml and connected to the GE Carestation respirator, which includes the nitrogen washout/washin technique (INview™ tool). FRC was then set to vary by different levels of PEEP (5, 8, 12 and 15 cmH₂O). The main outcome measures were bias and precision of the TestChest® when compared to the results from the washout/washin technique, according to the results of a Bland Altman Analysis. We verified our findings with volumetric computed tomography.

Results

One hundred and thirty-five nitrogen-wash-in/wash-out measurements were taken at three levels of F_IO₂ (0.4, 0.5, 0.6). The CT volumetry reproduced the set end-expiratory volumes at the Simulator with a bias of 4 ml. The nitrogen-wash-in/wash-out method had a bias of 603 ml with acceptable limits of agreement (95% CI 252 to − 953 ml). Changes were detected with a concordance rate of 97%.

Conclusions

We conclude that the TestChest® simulator is an accurate simulation tool, concerning the simulation of lung volumes. The nitrogen wash-in/wash out method correlated positively with FRC changes, despite a relatively large bias in absolute measurements. The reference volumes in the lung simulator verified with CT volumetry were very close to their expected values. The reason for the bias could not be determined.

Measurements of functional residual capacity during intensive care treatment: the technical aspects and its possible clinical applications

Direct measurement of lung volume, i.e. functional residual capacity (FRC) has been recommended for monitoring during mechanical ventilation. Mostly due to technical reasons, FRC measurements have not become a routine monitoring tool, but promising techniques have been presented. We performed a literature search of studies with the key words 'functional residual capacity' or 'end expiratory lung volume' and summarize the physiology and patho-physiology of FRC measurements in ventilated patients, describe the existing techniques for bedside measurement, and provide an overview of the clinical questions that can be addressed using an FRC assessment. The wash-in or wash-out of a tracer gas in a multiple breath maneuver seems to be best applicable at bedside, and promising techniques for nitrogen or oxygen wash-in/wash-out with reasonable accuracy and repeatability have been presented. Studies in ventilated patients demonstrate that FRC can easily be measured at bedside during various clinical settings, including positive end-expiratory pressure optimization, endotracheal suctioning, prone position, and the weaning from mechanical ventilation. Alveolar derecruitment can easily be monitored and improvements of FRC without changes of the ventilatory setting could indicate alveolar recruitment. FRC seems to be insensitive to over-inflation of already inflated alveoli. Growing evidence suggests that FRC measurements, in combination with other parameters such as arterial oxygenation and respiratory compliance, could provide important information on the pulmonary situation in critically ill patients. Further studies are needed to define the exact role of FRC in monitoring and perhaps guiding mechanical ventilation.

The Accuracy of the Oxygen Washout Technique for Functional Residual Capacity Assessment During Spontaneous Breathing

BACKGROUND

Measurement of functional residual capacity (FRC) is of considerable interest for monitoring patients with lung injury. The lack of instruments has impeded routine bedside FRC measurement. Recently, a simple automated method for FRC assessment by O2 washout has been introduced. We designed this study to evaluate the accuracy of FRC measurement using the O2 washout technique.

METHODS

The LUFU system (Draeger, Luebeck, Germany) estimates FRC by O2 washout, a variant of multiple breath nitrogen washout. This technique uses a sidestream O2-analyzer to calculate FRC from end-inspired and end-expired O2 concentrations during fast changes of Fio2. We measured FRC in 23 healthy, spontaneously breathing volunteers in the sitting position using three techniques: 1) helium dilution (FRC-He), 2) body plethysmography (FRC-bp), 3) oxygen washout (FRC-O2).

RESULTS

FRC-O2 (mean 4.1 +/- 1.1 L, range 2.4-6.9 L) corresponds with FRC-He (mean 4.0 +/- 1.0 L, range 2.4-6.2 L; bias of FRC-O2: -0.2 +/- 0.4 L) and FRC-bp (mean 4.2 +/- 1.0 L, range 2.8-6.1 L; bias of FRC-O2: 0.1 +/- 0.6 L).

CONCLUSIONS

The bias and precision of the O2 washout technique using the LUFU system were clinically acceptable when compared with FRC-He and FRC-bp for FRC assessment in spontaneously breathing volunteers.