Effect of negative middle-ear pressure on transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions

Neonatal Hearing Screening Using Wideband Absorbance and Otoacoustic Emissions Measured Under Ambient and Pressurized Conditions

BACKGROUND

The objective was to analyze wideband acoustic absorbance and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) from newborns without risk indicators of hearing loss and test the effectiveness of measuring TEOAEs under pressurized ear canal conditions.

METHODS

Evaluation of 102 newborns from a maternity hospital, who stayed in the well-baby nursery and did not have risk indicators for hearing loss. The procedures involved wideband tympanometry and TEOAEs performed at ambient pressure (AP) and at a pressure corresponding to maximum compliance (PP). Newborns were then divided into three groups according to their AP and PP results: G1 (PASS/PASS), G2 (FAIL/PASS), and G3 (FAIL/FAIL).

RESULTS

Comparing the three groups, pressurization improved the pass rate for G2 only. For wideband absorbance, differences were statistically significant for frequencies of 2, 3, and 6 kHz, with lower values under the AP condition. For TEOAEs, the differences were statistically significant in all bands, with lower values under the AP condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Pressurization was effective in detecting more TEOAEs in G2, thus reducing the number of failures in neonatal hearing screening and reducing the need to return for retesting.

Differences between Pressurized and Non-Pressurized Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Neonatal Subjects

INTRODUCTION

Recently, Interacoustics presented a new otoacoustic emission protocol where the probe pressurizes the ear cavity, thus eliminates the risk of non-assessment (REFER outcome) due to a negative middle ear pressure. This study evaluated the characteristics and the performance of this new protocol on a newborn well-baby population.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-three newborns (age 2.7 ± 1.1 days) for a total of 294 ears were assessed randomly. Transiently evoked otoacoustic responses were acquired by the Titan device (Interacoustics), using the default and a pressurized TEOAE protocol. The data were analyzed in terms of signal to noise ratios (S/Ns) at 5 frequencies, namely, 0.87, 1.94, 2.96, 3.97, and 4.97 kHz. To assess any possible gestational age (GE) effects on the TEOAE variables, the responses were subdivided in 4 different age subgroups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the left and right ear TEOAE responses, for age (in days), GE (in weeks), weight (in grams), and S/N at all 5 frequencies. Considering the pooled 294 ears, paired t tests between the default and the pressurized TEOAE data showed significant differences across all 5 frequencies (p < 0.01). The pressurized protocol generated TEOAE responses presenting larger S/Ns, and a positive additive effect of approximately 2.31 dB was observed at all tested frequencies. There were no significant GE effects on the pressurized TEOAE responses. In terms of performance, both protocols performed equally (same number of PASSes).

CONCLUSION

The pressurized TEOAE protocol generates responses with higher S/Ns which might be useful in borderline cases where the middle ear status might cause a REFER screening outcome.

Effect of Negative Middle Ear Pressure and Compensated Pressure on Wideband Absorbance and Otoacoustic Emissions in Children

Objective This study investigated pressurized transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) responses and wideband absorbance (WBA) in healthy ears and ears with negative middle ear pressure (NMEP). Method In this cross-sectional study, TEOAE amplitude, signal-to-noise ratio, and WBA were measured at ambient and tympanometric peak pressure (TPP) in 36 ears from 25 subjects with healthy ears (age range: 3.1-13.0 years) and 88 ears from 76 patients with NMEP (age range: 2.0-13.1 years), divided into 3 groups based on NMEP (Group 1 with TPP between -101 and -200 daPa, Group 2 with TPP between -201 and -300 daPa, and Group 3 with TPP between -301 and -400 daPa). Results Mean TEOAE amplitude, signal-to-noise ratio, and WBA were increased at TPP relative to that measured at ambient pressure between 0.8 and 1.5 kHz. Further decrease in TPP beyond -300 daPa did not result in further increases in the mean TEOAE or WBA at TPP. The correlation between TEOAE and WBA was dependent on the frequency, pressure conditions, and subject group. There was no difference in pass rates between the 2 pressure conditions for the control group, while the 3 NMEP groups demonstrated an improvement in pass rates at TPP. With pressurization, the false alarm rate for TEOAE due to NMEP was reduced by 17.8% for NMEP Group 1, 29.2% for NMEP Group 2, and 15.8% for NMEP Group 3. Conclusion Results demonstrated the feasibility and clinical benefits of measuring TEOAE and WBA under pressurized conditions. Pressurized TEOAE and WBA should be used for assessment of ears with NMEP in hearing screening programs to reduce false alarm rates.

Contrasting Effects of Pressure Compensation on TEOAE and DPOAE in Children With Negative Middle Ear Pressure

In children with normal cochlear acuity, middle ear fluid often abolishes otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), and negative middle ear pressure (NMEP) reduces them. No convincing evidence of beneficial pressure compensation on distortion product OAE (DPOAE) has yet been presented. Two studies aimed to document effects of NMEP on transient OAE (TEOAE) and DPOAE. In Study 1, TEOAE and DPOAE pass/fail responses were analyzed before and after pressure compensation in 50 consecutive qualifying referrals having NMEP from -100 to -299 daPa. Study 2 concentrated on DPOAE, recording both amplitude (distortion product amplitude) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) before and after pressure compensation. Of the 20 participants, 5 had both ears qualifying. An effect of compensation on meeting a pass criterion was present in TEOAE for both left and right ear data in Study 1 but not demonstrable in DPOAE. In Study 2, the distortion product amplitude compensation effect was marginal overall, and depended on recording frequency band. SNR values improved moderately after pressure compensation in the two (overlapping) sets of single-ear data. In the five cases with both ears qualifying, a stronger compensation effect size, over 3 dB, was seen. The absolute dependence of SNR on frequency was also strongly replicated, but in no analysis, the frequency × compensation interaction was significant. Independent of particular frequency range, the data support a limited SNR improvement in 2 to 3 dB for compensation in DPOAE, with slightly larger effects in ears giving SNRs between 0 dB and +6 dB, where pass/fail cutoffs would generally be located.

Chirp-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and Middle Ear Absorbance for Monitoring Ototoxicity in Cystic Fibrosis Patients

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to investigate the use of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and middle ear absorbance measurements to monitor auditory function in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) receiving ototoxic medications. TEOAEs were elicited with a chirp stimulus using an extended bandwidth (0.71 to 8 kHz) to measure cochlear function at higher frequencies than traditional TEOAEs. Absorbance over a wide bandwidth (0.25 to 8 kHz) provides information on middle ear function. The combination of these time-efficient measurements has the potential to identify early signs of ototoxic hearing loss.

DESIGN

A longitudinal study design was used to monitor the hearing of 91 patients with CF (median age = 25 years; age range = 15 to 63 years) who received known ototoxic medications (e.g., tobramycin) to prevent or treat bacterial lung infections. Results were compared to 37 normally hearing young adults (median age = 32.5 years; age range = 18 to 65 years) without a history of CF or similar treatments. Clinical testing included 226-Hz tympanometry, pure-tone air-conduction threshold testing from 0.25 to 16 kHz and bone conduction from 0.25 to 4 kHz. Experimental testing included wideband absorbance at ambient and tympanometric peak pressure and TEOAEs in three stimulus conditions: at ambient pressure and at tympanometric peak pressure using a chirp stimulus with constant incident pressure level across frequency and at ambient pressure using a chirp stimulus with constant absorbed sound power across frequency.

RESULTS

At the initial visit, behavioral audiometric results indicated that 76 of the 157 ears (48%) from patients with CF had normal hearing, whereas 81 of these ears (52%) had sensorineural hearing loss for at least one frequency. Seven ears from four patients had a confirmed behavioral change in hearing threshold for ≥3 visits during study participation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses demonstrated that all three TEOAE conditions were useful for distinguishing CF ears with normal hearing from ears with sensorineural hearing loss, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values ranging from 0.78 to 0.92 across methods for frequency bands from 2.8 to 8 kHz. Case studies are presented to illustrate the relationship between changes in audiometric thresholds, TEOAEs, and absorbance across study visits. Absorbance measures permitted identification of potential middle ear dysfunction at 5.7 kHz in an ear that exhibited a temporary hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The joint use of TEOAEs and absorbance has the potential to explain fluctuations in audiometric thresholds due to changes in cochlear function, middle ear function, or both. These findings are encouraging for the joint use of TEOAE and wideband absorbance objective tests for monitoring ototoxicity, particularly, in patients who may be too ill for behavioral hearing tests. Additional longitudinal studies are needed in a larger number of CF patients receiving ototoxic drugs to further evaluate the clinical utility of these measures in an ototoxic monitoring program.

Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions

OBJECTIVES

An important clinical application of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) is to evaluate cochlear outer hair cell function for the purpose of detecting sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Double-evoked TEOAEs were measured using a chirp stimulus, in which the stimuli had an extended frequency range compared to clinical tests. The present study compared TEOAEs recorded using an unweighted stimulus presented at either ambient pressure or tympanometric peak pressure (TPP) in the ear canal and TEOAEs recorded using a power-weighted stimulus at ambient pressure. The unweighted stimulus had approximately constant incident pressure magnitude across frequency, and the power-weighted stimulus had approximately constant absorbed sound power across frequency. The objective of this study was to compare TEOAEs from 0.79 to 8 kHz using these three stimulus conditions in adults to assess test performance in classifying ears as having either normal hearing or SNHL.

DESIGN

Measurements were completed on 87 adult participants. Eligible participants had either normal hearing (N = 40; M F = 16 24; mean age = 30 years) or SNHL (N = 47; M F = 20 27; mean age = 58 years), and normal middle ear function as defined by standard clinical criteria for 226-Hz tympanometry. Clinical audiometry, immittance, and an experimental wideband test battery, which included reflectance and TEOAE tests presented for 1-min durations, were completed for each ear on all participants. All tests were then repeated 1 to 2 months later. TEOAEs were measured by presenting the stimulus in the three stimulus conditions. TEOAE data were analyzed in each hearing group in terms of the half-octave-averaged signal to noise ratio (SNR) and the coherence synchrony measure (CSM) at frequencies between 1 and 8 kHz. The test-retest reliability of these measures was calculated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was measured at audiometric frequencies between 1 and 8 kHz to determine TEOAE test performance in distinguishing SNHL from normal hearing.

RESULTS

Mean TEOAE SNR was ≥8.7 dB for normal-hearing ears and ≤6 dB for SNHL ears for all three stimulus conditions across all frequencies. Mean test-retest reliability of TEOAE SNR was ≤4.3 dB for both hearing groups across all frequencies, although it was generally less (≤3.5 dB) for lower frequencies (1 to 4 kHz). AUCs were between 0.85 and 0.94 for all three TEOAE conditions at all frequencies, except for the ambient TEOAE condition at 2 kHz (0.82) and for all TEOAE conditions at 5.7 kHz with AUCs between 0.78 and 0.81. Power-weighted TEOAE AUCs were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than ambient TEOAE AUCs at 2 and 2.8 kHz, as was the TPP TEOAE AUC at 2.8 kHz when using CSM as the classifier variable.

CONCLUSIONS

TEOAEs evaluated in an ambient condition, at TPP and in a power-weighted stimulus condition, had good test performance in identifying ears with SNHL based on SNR and CSM in the frequency range from 1 to 8 kHz and showed good test-retest reliability. Power-weighted TEOAEs showed the best test performance at 2 and 2.8 kHz. These findings are encouraging as a potential objective clinical tool to identify patients with cochlear hearing loss.

Effects of Negative Middle Ear Pressure on Wideband Acoustic Immittance in Normal-Hearing Adults

OBJECTIVES

Wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) measurements are capable of quantifying middle ear performance over a wide range of frequencies relevant to human hearing. Static pressure in the middle ear cavity affects sound transmission to the cochlea, but few datasets exist to quantify the relationship between middle ear transmission and the static pressure. In this study, WAI measurements of normal ears are analyzed in both negative middle ear pressure (NMEP) and ambient middle ear pressure (AMEP) conditions, with a focus on the effects of NMEP in individual ears.

DESIGN

Eight subjects with normal middle ear function were trained to induce consistent NMEPs, quantified by the tympanic peak pressure (TPP) and WAI. The effects of NMEP on the wideband power absorbance level are analyzed for individual ears. Complex (magnitude and phase) WAI quantities at the tympanic membrane (TM) are studied by removing the delay due to the residual ear canal (REC) volume between the probe tip and the TM. WAI results are then analyzed using a simplified classical model of the middle ear.

RESULTS

For the 8 ears presented here, NMEP has the largest and most significant effect across ears from 0.8 to 1.9 kHz, resulting in reduced power absorbance by the middle ear and cochlea. On average, NMEP causes a decrease in the power absorbance level for low- to mid-frequencies, and a small increase above about 4 kHz. The effects of NMEP on WAI quantities, including the absorbance level and TM impedance, vary considerably across ears. The complex WAI at the TM and fitted model parameters show that NMEP causes a decrease in the aggregate compliance at the TM. Estimated REC delays show little to no dependence on NMEP.

CONCLUSIONS

In agreement with previous results, these data show that the power absorbance level is most sensitive to NMEP around 1 kHz. The REC effect is removed from WAI measurements, allowing for direct estimation of complex WAI at the TM. These estimates show NMEP effects consistent with an increased stiffness in the middle ear, which could originate from the TM, tensor tympani, annular ligament, or other middle ear structures. Model results quantify this nonlinear, stiffness-related change in a systematic way, that is not dependent on averaging WAI results in frequency bands. Given the variability of pressure effects, likely related to intersubject variability at AMEP, TPP is not a strong predictor of change in WAI at the TM. More data and modeling will be needed to better quantify the relationship between NMEP, WAI, and middle ear transmission.

Pressurized transient otoacoustic emissions measured using click and chirp stimuli

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) responses were measured in normal-hearing adult ears over frequencies from 0.7 to 8 kHz, and analyzed with reflectance/admittance data to measure absorbed sound power and the tympanometric peak pressure (TPP). The mean TPP was close to ambient. TEOAEs were measured in the ear canal at ambient pressure, TPP, and fixed air pressures from 150 to -200 daPa. Both click and chirp stimuli were used to elicit TEOAEs, in which the incident sound pressure level was constant across frequency. TEOAE levels were similar at ambient and TPP, and for frequencies from 0.7 to 2.8 kHz decreased with increasing positive and negative pressures. At 4-8 kHz, TEOAE levels were larger at positive pressures. This asymmetry is possibly related to changes in mechanical transmission through the ossicular chain. The mean TEOAE group delay did not change with pressure, although small changes were observed in the mean instantaneous frequency and group spread. Chirp TEOAEs measured in an adult ear with Eustachian tube dysfunction and TPP of -165 daPa were more robust at TPP than at ambient. Overall, results demonstrate the feasibility and clinical potential of measuring TEOAEs at fixed pressures in the ear canal, which provide additional information relative to TEOAEs measured at ambient pressure.

Relationship Between Distortion Product - Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) and High-Frequency Acoustic Immittance Measures

BACKGROUND Pathologies that alter the impedance of the middle ear may consequently modify the DPOAE amplitude. The aim of this study was to correlate information from 2 different clinical procedures assessing middle ear status. Data from DPOAE responses (both DP-Gram and DP I/O functions) were correlated with data from multi-component tympanometry at 1000 Hz. MATERIAL AND METHODS The subjects were divided into a double-peak group (DPG) and a single-peak group (SPG) depending on 1000 Hz tympanogram pattern. Exclusion criteria (described in the Methods section) were applied to both groups and finally only 31 ears were assigned to each group. The subjects were also assessed with traditional tympanometry and behavioral audiometry. RESULTS Compared to the single-peak group, in terms of the 226 Hz tympanometry data, subjects in the DPG group presented: (i) higher values of ear canal volume; (ii) higher peak pressure, and (iii) significantly higher values of acoustic admittance. DPOAE amplitudes were lower in the DPG group only at 6006 Hz, but the difference in amplitude between the DPG and SPG groups decreased as the frequency increased. Statistical differences were observed only at 1001 Hz and a borderline difference at 1501 Hz. In terms of DPOAE I/O functions, significant differences were observed only in 4 of the 50 tested points. CONCLUSIONS The 1000-Hz tympanometric pattern significantly affects the structure of DPOAE responses only at 1001 Hz. In this context, changes in the properties of the middle ear (as detected by the 1000 Hz tympanometry) can be considered as prime candidates for the observed variability in the DP-grams and the DP I/O functions.

Low-frequency otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren measured by two commercial devices

OBJECTIVE

Click evoked otoacoustic emissions in children are known to be good indicators of hearing function when used in the frequency range 1.5-4 kHz. Using two commercial devices, the present study investigates the usefulness of responses in the lower frequency range of 0.5-1 kHz evoked by 0.5 kHz tone bursts.

METHODS

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) were recorded from the ears of 37 schoolchildren (age 12-13 years). OAE measurements were then made using two devices: the ILO 292 (Otodynamics) and the HearId (Mimosa Acoustics). Each device was used for two measurements: first with a standard click stimulus at 80 dB pSPL (CEOAEs) and a second using a 0.5 kHz tone burst at 80 dB pSPL (TBOAEs). Pure tone audiometry and tympanometry were also conducted. Half-octave-band values of OAE signal to noise ratios (SNRs) and response levels were used to assess statistical differences.

RESULTS

Both devices provided similar SNR results for click and tone burst stimuli, although the ILO device generated slightly higher response levels for clicks. For the 0.5 kHz tone bursts, both devices evoked very weak responses at 0.5 kHz and the peak response occurred at 0.7-1 kHz. Generally, CEOAE SNRs were about 10 dB in the 1-4 kHz range, while SNRs for 0.5 kHz TBOAEs were about 10 dB at 0.7-1 kHz.

CONCLUSIONS

0.5 kHz TBOAEs could be measured in children as effectively as CEOAEs. They can provide additional information about the 0.7-1 kHz frequency range, a range over which CEOAEs do not usually contain responses above the noise floor. The main difficulty was that the maxima of the 0.5 kHz TBOAEs occurred at frequencies of 0.7-1 kHz, probably because of spectral splatter from the short tone burst stimulus and from rapidly falling responses of the cochlea and the recording system at low frequencies.

Application of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to inflation of the eustachian tube in low frequency tinnitus with normal hearing

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate the applications of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to assess the efficacy of eustachian tube inflation on low frequency tinnitus with normal hearing.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients (155 ears) suffering from subjective tinnitus with normal hearing sensitivity participated in this study. Control group consists of fifty volunteers (100 ears) without tinnitus. They were subjected to full history taking, otoscopy, basic audiologic evaluation and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE). As for the patients with decreased DPOAE amplitude over a limited frequency range from 0.5 to 1kHz, we offered nose dropping and tubal inflation for a week and DPOAE was preformed again. The patients were followed up for a month.

RESULTS

34.8% DPOAE-gram showed decreased amplitude at the frequencies from 0.5 to 1kHz in tinnitus group and "the ring" is mostly lower in pitch. Among the patients accepted the treatment of eustachian tube inflation, 16.7% the tinnitus disappeared, no recurrence within one month; 66.67% the tinnitus reduced within one month. 95.5% the amplitude of DPOAE showed improved over the limited frequency. 16.7% the tinnitus still existed.

CONCLUSION

The changes of the mechanical properties of ossicular chain or the tympanic membrane influenced by tympanum pressure may cause tinnitus, which is sub-clinical prior to the changes of audiometry and tympanometry. The low frequency tinnitus may gain transitory relief from ringing with the tubal inflation. DPOAE was proved to be a useful tool in the evaluation of the efficacy of tubal inflation on low frequency tinnitus with normal hearing.

Significance of a notch in the otoacoustic emission stimulus spectrum

Objective:

To explain a clinical observation: a notch in the stimulus spectrum during transient evoked otoacoustic emission measurement in ears with secretory otitis media.

Methods:

The effects of tympanic under-pressure were investigated using a pressure chamber. A model of the ear canal was also studied.

Results:

Tympanic membrane reflectance increased as a consequence of increased stiffness, causing a notch in the stimulus spectrum. In an adult, the notch could be clearly distinguished at an under-pressure of approximately −185 daPa. The sound frequency of the notch corresponded to a wavelength four times the ear canal length. The ear canal of infants was too short to cause a notch within the displayed frequency range. The notch was demonstrated using both Otodynamics and Madsen equipment.

Conclusion:

A notch in the otoacoustic emission stimulus spectrum can be caused by increased stiffness of the tympanic membrane, raising suspicion of low middle-ear pressure or secretory otitis media. This finding is not applicable to infants.

Compensating for deviant middle ear pressure in otoacoustic emission measurements, data, and comparison to a middle ear model

OBJECTIVE

Deviant middle ear pressure has a negative effect on the forward and backward transmission of stimulus and emissions through the middle ear. Resolving this deviant middle ear pressure is expected to lead to better middle ear transmission and, as a result of this, stronger otoacoustic emissions, which are better detectable. We investigated the effect of compensation o a deviant tympanic peak pressure on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs). Second, we compared patient data to model predictions made by Zwislocki's middle ear model.

SETTING

University Medical Center.

PATIENTS

Fifty-nine children aged between 0.5 and 9 years (mean, 4.4 yr).

INTERVENTION

Hearing investigations including CEOAE measurements at ambient and at compensated tympanic peak pressure (TPP).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

CEOAEs at ambient and compensated TPP.

RESULTS

Compensation of TPP resulted in higher emission amplitudes below 2 kHz (increase of 8-11 dB). In addition, the compensated measurement showed an increased phase lag (up to one-fourth cycle). For ears with mild deviations of TPP, Zwislocki's model could describe these changes. Pressure compensation was well described by a compliance increase of the tympanic membrane, the malleus, and the incus.

CONCLUSION

Compensating the ear canal pressure for negative tympanic peak pressure increased CEOAE amplitudes below 2 kHz and increased the phase lag. These changes can be predicted from an increase of the compliance of the tympanic membrane, incus, and malleus, as a consequence of the pressure compensation.

The influence of the type of breastfeeding on middle ear conditions in infants

Infants should be submitted to hearing screening upon birth, and for the results to be complete, it is necessary to assess middle ear conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To check whether the type of breastfeeding in infants between zero and four months can impact middle ear conditions my means an ENT assessment and acoustic immittance comparing neonates who were submitted to hearing screening with those who failed it.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Otoacoustic emissions (OAE) was carried out in 60 infants between zero and four months. They were distributed in two groups; group I had the infants with OAE and those infants in group II did not have OAE. They were submitted to tympanometry with a 1000 Hz test tone and ENT assessment.

RESULTS

Bottle fed infants or those who were fed in a mixed way had more changes to their audiometry and ENT assessment, with a statistically significant difference. The breastfed infants had a higher occasion of normal tympanometries and normal otorhinolaryngological assessment, with statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSION

We then concluded that those breastfed implants had less ENT changes and as well as less acoustic immittance change, thus enabling OAEs. Breastfeeding alone can be considered a protection factor against middle ear changes.

Design of a clinically viable pneumatic system for the acquisition of pressure compensated otoacoustic emissions

Otoacoustic emission (OAE) screening is perhaps one of the most common diagnostic tools used on both adults and children alike to clinically asses hearing health. However small to moderate middle ear pressures (both positive and negative), which are quite prevalent among the general population, are known to significantly reduce the OAE response specifically among frequencies below 2 kHz. This study focuses on the design and development of a software controlled syringe pump which will be used for the automatic compensation of middle ear pressure. This study reports validating test results which confirm the feasibility of using this system for future clinical trials.

Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans

OBJECTIVE

This study was intended to systematically examine the effect of negative middle ear pressure (MEP) on distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and to validate a compensation procedure to account for negative MEP encountered in DPOAE measurement.

DESIGN

In experiment 1, the 2f1 - f2 DPOAE was measured for nine f2 frequencies from 600 to 8000 Hz in 16 adults under three MEP conditions: normal MEP, negative MEP, and compensated MEP. The subjects' voluntarily induced negative MEPs, with magnitudes ranging from -40 to -420 daPa, were measured tympanometrically with the tympanometric peak pressure. Each negative MEP was then compensated for by applying an equivalent amount of negative air pressure into the ear canal. The three MEP conditions were compared in terms of difference in DPOAE level. Experiment 2 was conducted to measure the DPOAE under normal and negative MEP conditions by using a different system with a higher frequency resolution in 19 subjects.

RESULTS

Negative MEP generally attenuated DPOAEs more for low frequencies than for high frequencies. For the frequencies of 1000 Hz and below, the mean DPOAE level was reduced by at least 4 to 6 dB for negative MEPs lower than -100 daPa (i.e., less negative). Reduction of the DPOAE level increased with increasing negative MEP (e.g., 10 to 12 dB for -160 daPa and higher, i.e., more negative). For f2 = 2000, 4000, and 6000 Hz, the effect of negative MEP was not significant. For 3000 Hz, DPOAE-level reduction was significant (e.g., 5 dB for MEP = -70 to -95 daPa and up to 12 dB for -290 to -420 daPa). As a result, a peak at 2000 Hz and a notch at 3000 Hz appeared in the DPOAE change versus frequency function. For 8000 Hz, DPOAE levels tended to increase in high negative MEPs, although the changes were not significant. Intersubject variability in the effect of negative MEP on DPOAEs was large. As the negative MEPs were compensated for, the decreased DPOAE levels were significantly corrected. DPOAEs measured with higher resolution in experiment 2 verified the frequency-specific effects of negative MEPs. Results revealed that the peak and notch in the DPOAE change versus frequency function shifted toward higher frequencies when negative MEP was increased, and a second peak emerged at a higher frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative MEP substantially decreases DPOAE level for low frequencies and some mid-frequencies but tends to increase DPOAE level for high frequencies. Results suggest that any degree of negative MEP should be corrected to obtain an accurate outcome of DPOAE measurement. The MEP compensation procedure is effective in restoring normal DPOAEs in ears with negative MEPs. Examining changes in DPOAE level under negative MEP allows for further study of the transmission of acoustic signals through an altered middle ear system. A minimal change of DPOAE level at 2000 Hz indicates that the primary resonant frequency of the middle ear is lower than 2000 Hz. The variation in DPOAE change in the middle to high frequency range implies multiple resonances of the middle ear system.

Otoacoustic emissions in a hearing conservation program: general applicability in longitudinal monitoring and the relation to changes in pure-tone thresholds

The hearing status of workers (N = 233) in a printing office was assessed twice within seventeen months by pure-tone audiometry and otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). One of the questions was how a quality criterion of OAE-measurements based on a minimum signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) would affect the applicability on the entire population. Secondly, effects of noise exposure were investigated in overall changes in audiogram and OAE-measurements. For TEOAEs (transient evoked OAEs) in the frequency band of 4 kHz, only 55% of the data points meet the SNR-inclusion criterion. For DPOAEs (distortion product OAEs) around 6 kHz approximately 80% of the data points satisfy the criterion. Thus OAEs have a limited applicability for monitoring the hearing status of this entire population. Audiometry shows significant deteriorations at 6 and 8 kHz. TEOAEs show a significant decline at all frequency bands (1-4 kHz), DPOAEs between 4 and 8 kHz and less pronounced between 1 and 2 kHz. On group level, OAEs show a decline in a larger frequency region than the audiogram, suggesting an increased sensitivity of OAEs compared to audiometry.

Otoacoustic emissions at compensated middle ear pressure in children

Middle ear pathology has a negative effect on the detectability of otoacoustic emissions. In this study, we investigated the effect of compensating a deviant static middle ear pressure while measuring transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs). In 59 children (mean age 4 years, 5 months) TEOAEs were measured twice in one session: first at ambient pressure and than at compensated middle ear pressure. On average, TEOAE amplitudes increased by 1.9 dB as a result of middle ear pressure compensation. The amplitude increase was largest in frequency bands centred at 1 and 2 kHz and a statistically significant correlation was found between the amount of compensated pressure and the TEOAE amplitude increase. In the higher frequency bands centred at 3 and 4 kHz, TEOAE amplitudes were almost insensitive to pressure compensation. These results show that measuring OAEs at compensated middle ear pressure enhances the amplitude of TEOAEs, and thus improves the detectability.

Accoustic immitance measures in infants with 226 and 1000 hz probes: correlation with otoacoustic emissions and otoscopy examination

Audiological evaluation in infants should include the middle ear (immitance measures and otoscopy) and also a cochlear evaluation. Aim: To check which tympanometry tone test (226 Hz or 1000 Hz), transient otoacoustic emissions and otoscopy. Methods: Transient otoacoustic emissions were taken from sixty infants ranging from zero to four months of age. The babies were assigned to two groups of 30 infants each, according to the presence or absence of otoacoustic emissions (OAE). All babies have undergone tympanometry with probe tones of 226 and 1000 Hz and ENT evaluation. Results: Tests performed with 1000 Hz probe tone were more sensitive in identifying middle ear disorders. In children with normal tympanograms, both probe tones (226 and 1000 Hz) showed high specificity. All correlations were significant when the 1000 Hz probe tone was used. Conclusion: The high frequency probe tone (1000 Hz) presented the most significant correlation with OAE and otoscopy in infants from zero to four months of age.

A two-step scenario for hearing assessment with otoacoustic emissions at compensated middle ear pressure (in children 1-7 years old)

OBJECTIVE

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are widely used for assessing congenital and early-acquired sensorineural hearing loss in young children. Middle ear pathology has a negative effect on the presence of OAEs. In this study we investigated whether measuring OAEs at compensated middle ear pressure (CMEP) resulted in a higher pass rate than at ambient pressure. Secondly, we analysed the influence of 12 different pass definitions on the pass rates.

METHODS

One hundred and eleven children (age 1-7 years, mean 4 years and 5 months) were measured twice in one session: first at ambient pressure and then at CMEP.

RESULTS

The study showed a higher pass rate of OAEs at CMEP than at ambient pressure. A two-step scenario reduced the number of fails by 18-26%, depending on the pass/fail definition used.

CONCLUSION

Measuring OAEs at CMEP results in higher pass rates. Secondly, pass/fail definitions have a large influence on pass rates and this issue deserves further attention. Further studies must be done, before this method is readily applicable to universal neonatal screening.

Outer and middle ear status and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease

The purpose of this study was to investigate distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and outer/middle ear status in 12 African American children with normal hearing and homozygous sickle cell disease (SCD) and age-, gender-, and ear-matched African American controls. C. R. Downs, A. Stuart, & D. Holbert (2000) reported that DPOAE amplitudes were significantly larger for children with SCD. Because the integrity of the middle ear system directly influences OAE characteristics, it was felt that concurrent investigation of DPOAE amplitudes and outer/middle ear function in children with SCD was warranted. DPOAEs were evoked by 13 primary-tone pairs with f2 frequencies ranging from 1000 to 4500 Hz. Outer/middle ear status was assessed with tympanometry through indices of peak compensated static acoustic admittance, tympanometric width, tympanometric peak pressure, ear canal volume, and middle ear resonance frequency. Tympanograms were recorded with probe-tone frequencies of 226 and 678 Hz. DPOAE amplitudes were significantly larger for children with SCD (p < .05). There were no group differences in any of the middle ear indices (p > .05). These findings suggest that increased DPOAE amplitudes for children with SCD cannot be attributed to differences in outer/middle ear function as assessed with tympanometry.

A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program

Non-linear transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) at 74dB pSPL, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) at 65/45dB SPL and pure-tone audiometry were used to detect noise-induced, inner car changes in a longitudinal study. Repeated-measures ANOVAs were made on the Noise (n=69) and Quiet (n=42) groups. The Noise group's hearing thresholds increased by 1.2 dB and DPOAE amplitude decreased by -0.9 dB. For both groups, TEOAE amplitude decreased by approximately -0.6 dB. Eight of 12 ears with permanent threshold shift (PTS) and 10 of 13 ears with temporary threshold shift (TTS) showed TEOAE decrements or low baseline TEOAE amplitudes. Fewer TTS and PTS ears also showed DPOAE decrements, and there was never a DPOAE decrement without a corresponding TEOAE decrement or low TEOAE baseline. Some TTS ears showed permanent emission decrements. Although otoacoustic emissions show promise in detecting noise-induced inner ear changes, it is premature to use them in hearing conservation programs.

Evaluation of anesthesia effects in a rat animal model using otoacoustic emission protocols

Anesthesia effects on otoacoustic emission (OAE) recordings were evaluated in a group of 72 Sprague-Dawley rats (mean weight 225+/-20 gr). Two anesthesia dosages (high and normal) and two anesthetic protocols (ketamine-xylazine, ketamine-xylazine-atropine) were tested. Transient evoked OAE (TEOAE) and distortion product OAE (DPOAE) responses were recorded in 10 min intervals, for a total period of 60 min. Analyses of the data with repeated measure models indicated the following: (1) The animals receiving a high dose of anesthesia (cumulative dose 66.6 mg of ketamine and 13.2 mg of xylazine/kg of body weight) presented significant alterations of the TEOAE response level and the signal to noise ratio at 3.0 kHz; (2) the animals receiving a normal dose of ketamine-xylazine anesthesia (cumulative dose 50 mg of ketamine and 10 mg of xylazine/kg of body weight) presented TEOAE and DPOAE responses invariant in terms of time; (3) significant differences were observed in the DPOAE responses from animals anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine and ketamine-xylazine-atropine. The data support the hypothesis that the ketamine anesthesia OAE suppressing mechanism is related to middle-ear mechanics.

Otoacoustic emissions and tympanometry in children with otitis media

OBJECTIVE

To examine otoacoustic emission and tympanometric findings in children with surgically confirmed middle ear effusion (MEE).

DESIGN

A total of 102 children aged 0.7 to 11.4 yr undergoing surgery because of otitis media were included in the study. A tympanometric examination and transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) measurement were performed on each ear before myringotomy. MEE was aspirated, weighed and classified as mucoid or nonmucoid. TEOAE measurements were compared with the quantity and quality of MEE and to the tympanometric findings.

RESULTS

Fifty (72%) ears out of the 65 ears containing effusion showed reduced TEOAE. The quantity of effusion was associated significantly (p < 0.001) with the TEOAE responses, and mucoid effusion reduced the emissions more than nonmucoid. The sensitivity of tympanometry in identifying the ears without recordable TEOAE was 73% and the specificity 81%.

CONCLUSION

MEE results in a significant reduction in TEOAEs even when the effusion is nonmucoid. This suggests that transmission of acoustic energy to and from the middle ear is altered in children experiencing any form of otitis media with effusion.

Tympanic pressure gradients and otoacoustic emissions

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate effects of tympanic over- and under-pressure, induced by variations in ambient pressure on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) in healthy individuals. It was of particular interest to elucidate whether changes in the CEOAE response in both spectral and time domains could be attributed not only to tympanic, but also to cochlear influence.

DESIGN

Nine healthy subjects with normal hearing and middle ear pressure were exposed to ambient pressure changes in a pressure chamber. The pressure was progressively changed in 100 daPa steps to accomplish an increase and a decrease in tympanic pressure. Pressure equilibration of the middle ear was avoided. The relative tympanic over- and under-pressure (+/- 320daPa) was monitored by tympanometry and the CEOAEs recorded at every step of tympanic pressure change.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant reduction of the otoacoustic emission (OAE) response levels and reproducibility already at 100 daPa of ambient pressure change. The OAE response was progressively reduced by increased pressure gradients. The CEOAEs recorded during progressive tympanic over- and under-pressure also had increasingly shorter latencies. These changes of the OAE response characteristics were most pronounced in the 750 to 3000 Hz frequency bands.

CONCLUSIONS

The progressive attenuation of the OAE response and the concomitant shortening of the OAE response latencies were observed during a combination of altered middle and inner ear pressure. Although the middle and inner ear influence cannot be separated we suggest, based on our findings, that the shortening of latencies may partly be caused by inner ear pressure changes and stiffening of the labyrinthine membranes. Further studies are needed to more specifically clarify the relative contribution of the tympanic and labyrinthine influence, respectively, for the various aspects of pressure influence on the OAE response.

Interactive effects of the middle ear pathology and the associated hearing loss on transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measures

Sixty-three children aged 4 to 17 years were examined by tympanometry, pure-tone audiometry, transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), and otoscopy to evaluate the effects of middle ear pathologies and the associated hearing loss on TEOAEs. TEOAE measures were highly specific (93.8%) in identifying normal ears that passed both audiometric and tympanometric criteria. The sensitivity for identifying abnormal ears was also reasonable (83. 3%). The effects of the middle ear abnormality were most significant, regardless of the degree of hearing loss, when the tympanogram was type B with normal volume measures, which is associated with reduced eardrum mobility and middle ear fluid. The middle ear conditions producing the greater negative pressure, which in turn led to more conductive hearing loss, also produced more TEOAE failures. The mere presence of an open ventilation tube was not a determining factor for absent TEOAEs because 60% of the open ventilation tubes had normal TEOAEs. Provided that the clinician understands the effects of middle ear pathologies on otoacoustic emissions, TEOAEs can be a great asset for diagnosis of both otologic and audiologic disorders.

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions as a measure of noise-induced threshold shift

Otoacoustic emissions and behavioral hearing thresholds were measured before and after exposure to a 10-min, 105-dB SPL, half-octave band of noise centered at 1.414 kHz. Along a single recovery function, transient-evoked otoacoustic-emission (TEOAE) measurements made with 74-dB pSPL nonlinear click ensembles were alternated with a Bekesy threshold-tracking procedure. Each of the 14 participants with normal hearing underwent 2 hour-long temporary-threshold shift (TTS) sessions as well as 2 pretest sessions and a posttest session. The Bekesy test frequency was fixed at 2.0 kHz, whereas emissions were analyzed in half-octave bandwidths with center frequencies ranging from 0.707 to 5.656 kHz. Results showed that (a) the maximum temporary emission shifts (TES) were half to 1 octave above the exposure frequency; (b) the 4.7-dB average temporary emission shift magnitude at approximately 2 min postexposure was less than half of the 11.7-dB average TTS; (c) the average recovery times for emissions and hearing thresholds were similar (188 vs. 186 min); and (d) the average TTS magnitude along the recovery function was predictable from TES magnitude. It is concluded that both TEOAEs and Bekesy thresholds reveal the same aspects of postexposure inner-ear changes.