Within-patient longitudinal speech reception measures with continuous interleaved sampling processors for ineraid implanted subjects

Consonant and vowel confusions in well-performing adult cochlear implant users, measured with a nonsense syllable repetition test

OBJECTIVE

The study's objective was to identify consonant and vowel confusions in cochlear implant (CI) users, using a nonsense syllable repetition test.

DESIGN

In this cross-sectional study, participants repeated recorded mono- and bisyllabic nonsense words and real-word monosyllables in an open-set design.

STUDY SAMPLE

Twenty-eight Norwegian-speaking, well-performing adult CI users (13 unilateral and 15 bilateral), using implants from Cochlear, Med-El and Advanced Bionics, and a reference group of 20 listeners with normal hearing participated.

RESULTS

For the CI users, consonants were confused more often than vowels (58% versus 71% correct). Voiced consonants were confused more often than unvoiced (54% versus 64% correct). Voiced stops were often repeated as unvoiced, whereas unvoiced stops were never repeated as voiced. The nasals were repeated correctly in one third of the cases and confused with other nasals in one third of the cases. The real-word monosyllable score was significantly higher than the nonsense syllable score (76% versus 63% correct).

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed a general devoicing bias for the stops and a high confusion rate of nasals with other nasals, which suggests that the low-frequency coding in CIs is insufficient. Furthermore, the nonsense syllable test exposed more perception errors than the real word test.

Preliminary evaluation of computer-assisted home training for French cochlear implant recipients

For French cochlear implant (CI) recipients, in-person clinical auditory rehabilitation is typically provided during the first few years post-implantation. However, this is often inconvenient, it requires substantial time resources and can be problematic when appointments are unavailable. In response, we developed a computer-based home training software ("French AngelSound™") for French CI recipients. We recently conducted a pilot study to evaluate the newly developed French AngelSound™ in 15 CI recipients (5 unilateral, 5 bilateral, 5 bimodal). Outcome measures included phoneme recognition in quiet and sentence recognition in noise. Unilateral CI users were tested with the CI alone. Bilateral CI users were tested with each CI ear alone to determine the poorer ear to be trained, as well as with both ears (binaural performance). Bimodal CI users were tested with the CI ear alone, and with the contralateral hearing aid (binaural performance). Participants trained at home over a one-month period (10 hours total). Phonemic contrast training was used; the level of difficulty ranged from phoneme discrimination in quiet to phoneme identification in multi-talker babble. Unilateral and bimodal CI users trained with the CI alone; bilateral CI users trained with the poorer ear alone. Outcomes were measured before training (pre-training), immediately after training was completed (post-training), and one month after training was stopped (follow-up). For all participants, post-training CI-only vowel and consonant recognition scores significantly improved after phoneme training with the CI ear alone. For bilateral and bimodal CI users, binaural vowel and consonant recognition scores also significantly improved after training with a single CI ear. Follow-up measures showed that training benefits were largely retained. These preliminary data suggest that the phonemic contrast training in French AngelSound™ may significantly benefit French CI recipients and may complement clinical auditory rehabilitation, especially when in-person visits are not possible.

Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing

In cochlear implants (CIs), phantom stimulation can be used to extend the pitch range toward apical regions of the cochlea. Phantom stimulation consists of partial bipolar stimulation, in which current is distributed across two intracochlear electrodes and one extracochlear electrode as defined by the compensation coefficient σ. The aim of this study was, (1) to evaluate the benefit of conveying low-frequency information through phantom stimulation for cochlear implant (CI) subjects with low-frequency residual hearing using electric stimulation alone, (2) to compare the speech reception thresholds obtained from electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) and electric stimulation in combination with phantom stimulation (EPS), and (3) to investigate the effect of spectrally overlapped bandwidth of speech conveyed via simultaneous acoustic and phantom stimulation on speech reception thresholds.

The smaller the frequency-to-place mismatch the better the hearing outcomes in cochlear implant recipients?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of frequency-to-place mismatch, i.e. the mismatch between the tonotopic frequency map in the cochlea and the frequency band that is assigned to an electrode contact of a cochlear implant (CI) at the same cochlear location on speech perception outcomes, using postoperative CT images.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational single-centre study.

METHODS

Retrospective pre- and postoperative clinical CT data of 39 CI recipients with normal cochlear anatomy were analysed in an otological surgical planning software. The tonotopic frequency at each electrode position was estimated using the Greenwood function. For each patient, frequency-to-place mismatch between the tonotopic frequency and the fitted centre frequency for each electrode contact was calculated. The influence of frequency-to-place mismatch on speech perception in noise at 6 and 12 months after CI activation was studied.

RESULTS

A significant linear correlation was found between the frequency-to-place mismatch and speech perception in noise 6 months after cochlear implantation (p < 0.05). The smaller the frequency-to-place mismatch, the better the initial speech perception in noise results of the CI recipients. The significant effect disappeared after 12 months CI experience.

CONCLUSION

The study findings support the idea of minimizing the frequency-to-place mismatch in CI recipients in order to pursue better initial speech perception in noise. Further research is needed to investigate the prospect of tonotopic fitting strategies based upon postoperative CT images of the exact locations of the electrode contacts.

Consonant and Vowel Identification in Cochlear Implant Users Measured by Nonsense Words: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to establish a baseline of the vowel and consonant identification scores in prelingually and postlingually deaf users of multichannel cochlear implants (CIs) tested with consonant-vowel-consonant and vowel-consonant-vowel nonsense syllables.

METHOD

Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles reporting consonant and vowel identification scores in CI users measured by nonsense words. Relevant studies were independently assessed and screened by 2 reviewers. Consonant and vowel identification scores were presented in forest plots and compared between studies in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-seven articles with 50 studies, including 647 participants, thereof 581 postlingually deaf and 66 prelingually deaf, met the inclusion criteria of this study. The mean performance on vowel identification tasks for the postlingually deaf CI users was 76.8% (N = 5), which was higher than the mean performance for the prelingually deaf CI users (67.7%; N = 1). The mean performance on consonant identification tasks for the postlingually deaf CI users was higher (58.4%; N = 44) than for the prelingually deaf CI users (46.7%; N = 6). The most common consonant confusions were found between those with same manner of articulation (/k/ as /t/, /m/ as /n/, and /p/ as /t/).

CONCLUSIONS

The mean performance on consonant identification tasks for the prelingually and postlingually deaf CI users was found. There were no statistically significant differences between the scores for prelingually and postlingually deaf CI users. The consonants that were incorrectly identified were typically confused with other consonants with the same acoustic properties, namely, voicing, duration, nasality, and silent gaps. A univariate metaregression model, although not statistically significant, indicated that duration of implant use in postlingually deaf adults predict a substantial portion of their consonant identification ability. As there is no ceiling effect, a nonsense syllable identification test may be a useful addition to the standard test battery in audiology clinics when assessing the speech perception of CI users.

Percutaneous pedestals in cochlear implantation

Percutaneous pedestals have been integral to the development of cochlear implants since 1969. By enabling direct electrical access to implanted electrodes or other devices, they allow optimization of control of stimulation strategies. Similarly, technology not validated for implantable use can be safely tested. These advantages have facilitated the development of cochlear implants and also resulted in their inclusion in trials investigating electronic implants developed for other organs. Surgery is straightforward, but post-operative care, in particular, skin-care is crucial to ensure complications are minimized. This review discusses the history of percutaneous pedestal use in cochlear implants and other electronic devices. Surgical technique, aftercare, and complications of surgery are discussed along with possibilities for future development.

The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation

Though much is known about how words are recognized, little research has focused on how a degraded signal affects the fine-grained temporal aspects of real-time word recognition. The perception of degraded speech was examined in two populations with the goal of describing the time course of word recognition and lexical competition. Thirty-three postlingually deafened cochlear implant (CI) users and 57 normal hearing (NH) adults (16 in a CI-simulation condition) participated in a visual world paradigm eye-tracking task in which their fixations to a set of phonologically related items were monitored as they heard one item being named. Each degraded-speech group was compared with a set of age-matched NH participants listening to unfiltered speech. CI users and the simulation group showed a delay in activation relative to the NH listeners, and there is weak evidence that the CI users showed differences in the degree of peak and late competitor activation. In general, though, the degraded-speech groups behaved statistically similarly with respect to activation levels.

Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users

OBJECTIVE

The abilities to localize sounds and segregate speech from interfering sounds in a complex auditory environment were studied in a group of adults who use bilateral cochlear implants. The first aim of the study was to investigate the change in speech intelligibility under bilateral and unilateral listening modes as a function of bilateral experience during the first 6 mo of activation. The second aim was to look at whether localization and speech intelligibility in the presence of interfering speech are correlated and if the relationship is specific to the bilateral listening mode. The third aim was to examine whether sound lateralization (right versus left) emerges before sound localization within a hemifield.

DESIGN

Participants were 17 native English speaking adults with postlingual deafness. All subjects received the Nucleus 24 Contour implant in both ears, either during the same surgery or during two separate surgeries that were no more than 1 mo apart. Both devices for each subject were activated at the same time, regardless of surgical approach. Speech intelligibility was measured at 3 and 6 mo after activation. Target speech was presented at 0 degrees in front. Testing was conducted in quiet and in the presence of four-talker babble. The babble was located on the right, on the left, or in front (colocated with the target). Sound localization abilities were measured at the 3 mo interval. All testing was conducted under three listening modes: left ear alone, right ear alone, or bilateral.

RESULTS

On the speech-in-babble task, benefit of listening with two ears compared with one was greater when going from 3 to 6 mo of experience. This was evident when the target speech and interfering speech were spatially separated, but not when they were presented from the same location. At 3 mo postactivation of bilateral hearing, 82% of subjects demonstrated bilateral benefit when right/left discrimination was evaluated. In contrast, 47% of subjects showed a bilateral benefit when sound localization was evaluated, suggesting that directional hearing might emerge in a two-step process beginning with discrimination and converging on more fine-grained localization. The bilateral speech intelligibility scores were positively correlated with sound localization abilities, so that listeners who were better able to hear speech in babble were generally better able to identify source locations.

CONCLUSIONS

During the early stages of bilateral hearing through cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults, there is an early emergence of spatial hearing skills. Although nearly all subjects can discriminate source locations to the right versus left, less than half are able to perform the more difficult task of identifying source locations in a multispeaker array. Benefits for speech intelligibility with one versus two implants improve with time, in particular when spatial cues are used to segregate speech and competing noise. Localization and speech-in-noise abilities in this group of patients are somewhat correlated.

Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing

Sensitivity to interaural time difference (ITD) in constant-amplitude pulse trains was measured in four sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant (CI) subjects. The sensitivity measurements were made as a function of time beginning directly after the second ear was implanted, continued for periods of months before subjects began wearing bilateral sound processors, and extended for months while the subjects used bilateral sound processors in day-to-day listening. Measurements were also made as a function of the relative position of the left/right electrodes. The two subjects with the shortest duration of binaural deprivation before implantation demonstrated ITD sensitivity soon after second-ear implantation (before receiving the second sound processor), while the other two did not demonstrate sensitivity until after months of daily experience using bilateral processors. The interaural mismatch in electrode position required to decrease ITD sensitivity by a factor of 2 (half-width) for CI subjects was five times greater than the half-width for interaural carrier-frequency disparity in normal-hearing subjects listening to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated high-frequency tones. This large half-width is likely to contribute to poor binaural performance in CI users, especially in environments with multiple broadband sound sources.

Ineraid to Med-El Combi 40+ upgrade: a case report

Continual changes in cochlear implant technology have resulted in the development of superior implants which improve quality of life of users. We present the case of a taxi driver who has been in our cochlear implant programme since 1991 and has required reimplantation. We discuss the benefits of the new implant on his life and work. A novel technique to successfully reimplant the ipsilateral cochlea is highlighted.

Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures

Advances in implant technology and speech processing have provided great benefit to many cochlear implant patients. However, some patients receive little benefit from the latest technology, even after many years' experience with the device. Moreover, even the best cochlear implant performers have great difficulty understanding speech in background noise, and music perception and appreciation remain major challenges. Recent studies have shown that targeted auditory training can significantly improve cochlear implant patients' speech recognition performance. Such benefits are not only observed in poorly performing patients, but also in good performers under difficult listening conditions (e.g., speech noise, telephone speech, music, etc.). Targeted auditory training has also been shown to enhance performance gains provided by new implant devices and/or speech processing strategies. These studies suggest that cochlear implantation alone may not fully meet the needs of many patients, and that additional auditory rehabilitation may be needed to maximize the benefits of the implant device. Continuing research will aid in the development of efficient and effective training protocols and materials, thereby minimizing the costs (in terms of time, effort and resources) associated with auditory rehabilitation while maximizing the benefits of cochlear implantation for all recipients.

Horizontal-Plane Localization of Noise and Speech Signals by Postlingually Deafened Adults Fitted With Bilateral Cochlear Implants*

OBJECTIVES

The main purpose of the study was to assess the ability of adults with bilateral cochlear implants to localize noise and speech signals in the horizontal plane. A second objective was to measure the change in localization performance in these adults between approximately 5 and 15 mo after activation. A third objective was to evaluate the relative roles of interaural level difference (ILD) and interaural temporal difference (ITD) cues in localization by these subjects.

DESIGN

Twenty-two adults, all postlingually deafened and all bilaterally fitted with MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implants, were tested in a modified source identification task. Subjects were tested individually in an anechoic chamber, which contained an array of 43 numbered loudspeakers extending from -90 degrees to +90 degrees azimuth. On each trial, a 200-msec signal (either a noise burst or a speech sample) was presented from one of 17 active loudspeakers (span: +/-80 degrees ), and the subject had to identify which source from the 43 loudspeakers in the array produced the signal. Subjects were tested in three conditions: left device only active, right device only active, and both devices active. Twelve of the 22 subjects were retested approximately 10 mo after their first test. In Experiment 2, the spectral content and rise-decay time of the noise stimulus were manipulated.

RESULTS

The relationship between source azimuth and response azimuth was characterized in terms of the adjusted constant error (ĉ). (1) With both devices active, ĉ for the noise stimulus varied from 8.1 degrees to 43.4 degrees (mean: 24.1 degrees ). By comparison, ĉ for a group of listeners with normal hearing ranged from 3.5 degrees to 7.8 degrees (mean: 5.6 degrees ). When subjects listened in unilateral mode (with one device turned off), ĉ was at or near chance (50.5 degrees ) in all cases. However, when considering unilateral performance on each subject's better side, average ĉ for the speech stimulus was 47.9 degrees , which was significantly (but only slightly) better than chance. (2) When listening bilaterally, error score was significantly lower for the speech stimulus (mean ĉ = 21.5 degrees ) than for the noise stimulus (mean ĉ = 24.1 degrees ). (3) As a group, the 12 subjects who were retested 10 mo after their first visit showed no significant improvement in localization performance during the intervening time. However, two subjects who performed very poorly during their first visit showed dramatic improvement (error scores were halved) over the intervening time. In Experiment 2, removing the high-frequency content of noise signals resulted in significantly poorer performance, but removing the low-frequency content or increasing the rise-decay time did not have an effect.

CONCLUSIONS

In agreement with previously reported data, subjects with bilateral cochlear implants localized sounds in the horizontal plane remarkably well when using both of their devices, but they generally could not localize sounds when either device was deactivated. They could localize the speech signal with slightly, but significantly better accuracy than the noise, possibly due to spectral differences in the signals, to the availability of envelope ITD cues with the speech but not the noise signal, or to more central factors related to the social salience of speech signals. For most subjects the remarkable ability to localize sounds has stabilized by 5 mo after activation. However, for some subjects who perform poorly initially, there can be substantial improvement past 5 mo. Results from Experiment 2 suggest that ILD cues underlie localization ability for noise signals, and that ITD cues do not contribute.

Computer-Assisted Speech Training for Cochlear Implant Patients: Feasibility, Outcomes, and Future Directions

Learning electrically stimulated speech patterns can be a new and difficult experience for cochlear implant patients. Cochlear implantation alone may not fully meet the needs of many patients, and additional auditory rehabilitation may be necessary to maximize the benefits of the implant device. A recently developed computer-assisted speech-training program provides cochlear implant patients with the means to conduct auditory rehabilitation at home. The training software targets important acoustic contrasts between speech stimuli and provides auditory and visual feedback as well as progressive training, thereby maintaining patients' interest in the auditory training exercises. Recent scientific studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of such specialized auditory training programs in improving cochlear implant patients' speech recognition performance. Provided with an inexpensive and accessible auditory training program, cochlear implant patients may find the motivation and momentum to get the most from the implant device.

Speech Recognition for Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Modes in the Presence of Uncorrelated Noise Sources

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the current investigation was to compare speech recognition in noise for bilateral and unilateral modes within postlingually deafened, adult bilateral cochlear implant recipients. In addition, it was of interest to evaluate the time course of the bilateral speech-recognition advantage and the effect of changing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on the magnitude of the bilateral advantage.

DESIGN

In the first experiment, 16 postlingually deafened adults who were bilaterally implanted with the MED-EL C40+ cochlear device were evaluated in unilateral left, unilateral right, and bilateral conditions 4 to 7 mo after activation. Speech recognition in the presence of five spatially separated, uncorrelated noise sources was evaluated using both a single fixed SNR of +10 dB and an adaptive-SNR method. In a follow-up study, a subset of 10 participants was re-evaluated using an identical fixed-SNR method 12 to 17 mo after activation to examine the time course of speech-recognition performance in both unilateral and bilateral modes at a single SNR. A third study was performed with a subset of six participants to examine performance over a range of SNRs. In this study, speech recognition was measured 12 to 17 mo after activation in quiet and at +5, +10, +15, and +20 dB SNRs using the same five uncorrelated noise sources.

RESULTS

The speech-recognition data revealed a significant bilateral advantage of 3.3 dB using the adaptive-SNR method. A significant bilateral advantage of 9% was also measured using a fixed +10 dB SNR. Results from the second study revealed that experience resulted in a significant (11 to 20%) increase in speech-recognition-in-noise performance for both unilateral and bilateral modes; however, the magnitude of the bilateral advantage was not affected by experience. Results from the third study revealed the largest bilateral advantage at the poorest SNR evaluated. In addition, performance in quiet was significantly better than that measured in the presence of noise, even at the +20 dB SNR.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of these experiments support a small but significant bilateral speech-recognition-in-noise advantage for cochlear implant recipients in an environment with multiple noise sources. This advantage is presumed to be attributable to the combined effects of binaural squelch and diotic summation. Although experience generally improved speech-recognition-in-noise performance in both unilateral and bilateral modes, a consistent bilateral advantage (approximately 10%) was measured at 4 to 7 mo and at 12 to 17 mo postactivation.

Lexical Information Drives Perceptual Learning of Distorted Speech: Evidence From the Comprehension of Noise-Vocoded Sentences

Speech comprehension is resistant to acoustic distortion in the input, reflecting listeners' ability to adjust perceptual processes to match the speech input. For noise-vocoded sentences, a manipulation that removes spectral detail from speech, listeners' reporting improved from near 0% to 70% correct over 30 sentences (Experiment 1). Learning was enhanced if listeners heard distorted sentences while they knew the identity of the undistorted target (Experiments 2 and 3). Learning was absent when listeners were trained with nonword sentences (Experiments 4 and 5), although the meaning of the training sentences did not affect learning (Experiment 5). Perceptual learning of noise-vocoded speech depends on higher level information, consistent with top-down, lexically driven learning. Similar processes may facilitate comprehension of speech in an unfamiliar accent or following cochlear implantation.

Matching the neural adaptation in the rat ventral cochlear nucleus produced by artificial (electric) and acoustic stimulation of the cochlea

To investigate neural adaptive properties, near-field evoked potentials were recorded from a chronically implanted electrode in the ventral cochlear nucleus in awake Long-Evans rats exposed to acoustic stimuli or receiving intracochlear electric stimulation. Stimuli were 250-ms trains of repetitive acoustic clicks (10, 30 and 50 dB SPL) or biphasic electric pulses (30, 50 and 70 microA) with intratrain pulse rates ranging from 100 to 1000 pulses per second (pps). The amplitude of the first negative (N(1)) to positive (P(1)) component of the average evoked potentials was measured for each consecutive individual pulse in the train. While a progressive exponential decrease in N(1)-P(1) amplitude was observed as a function of the position of the pulse within the train for both types of stimulation, the decrement of electric responses (adaptive pattern) was substantially less prominent than that observed for acoustic stimuli. Based on this difference, the present work was extended by modifying electric stimuli in order to try to restore normal adaptation phenomena. The results suggest the feasibility of mimicking acoustic adaptation by stimulation with exponentially decreasing electric pulse trains, which may be clinically applicable in the auditory implant field.

Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems

The goal of this study was to evaluate electrical field interactions produced by the stimulation of different types of intracochlear electrodes in 12 adult subjects (three Ineraid, four Clarion S-Series, three S-Series with the electrode positioning system-EPS and two Clarion HiFocus-I with the EPS). Psychophysical measurements were conducted with biphasic stimuli (813 pulse per second, 153.8 micros/phase). "Perturbation" signals (300 ms) were applied to one electrode chosen at the middle of the array and their effects on detection thresholds of "probe" signals (30 ms) were measured on the neighbor basal electrode. Perturbation levels were set below the detection threshold of the perturbation electrode (-2 dB re threshold). Measurements were first conducted for simultaneous stimulation of the probe and of the perturbation electrodes, for monopolar for all subjects and for bipolar stimulus configurations for both Clarion HiFocus-I subjects. The tested Clarion electrodes did not present lower monopolar interactions than the Ineraid electrodes. Nevertheless, considering the shorter distance between electrodes for the Clarion than for the Ineraid, the tested Clarion electrodes might be more selective than the Ineraid. We did not find any significant monopolar electrical field-interaction differences between subjects who received the S-Series array with and without the EPS. We did not find lower interactions for both subjects who received the HiFocus-I array than for subjects who received the S-Series. Electrical field interactions were lower for bipolar than for monopolar configurations for both HiFocus-I subjects. A second set of measurements was conducted for nonsimultaneous stimulation similar to the one used in continuous interleaved sampling sound strategy. These measurements showed that interactions evaluated for simultaneous biphasic stimuli were larger than for nonsimultaneous stimulation.

Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems

The goal of this study was to evaluate, from a psychophysical standpoint, the neural spread of excitation produced by the stimulation of different types of intracochlear electrode arrays: the Ineraid, the Clarion S-Series on its own or with the Electrode Positioning System (EPS), and the Clarion HiFocus-I with the EPS. The EPS is an independent silicone part designed to bring the electrode array close to the modiolus. Forward masking was evaluated in 12 adult subjects (3 Ineraid, 4 Clarion S-Series, 3 Clarion S-Series+EPS, 3 HiFocus-I+EPS) by psychophysical experiments conducted using trains of biphasic stimuli (813 pulses per second, 307.6 micros/phase). Masker signals (+8 dB re: threshold, 300 ms) were applied to the most apical electrode. Probe signals (30 ms, 10-ms postmasker) were delivered to more basal electrodes. Masked and unmasked detection thresholds of probe signals were measured. For both Clarion HiFocus-I subjects, measurements were conducted in both monopolar and bipolar stimulus configurations. No major differences were found in forward masking between the different intracochlear electrode arrays tested in the monopolar configuration at suprathreshold levels equivalent to those used in speech-coding strategies, but significant differences were found between subjects. A significant negative correlation also was found between the level of forward masking and the consonant identification performance. These measurements showed that the neural spread of excitation was more restricted in the bipolar configuration than in the monopolar configuration for HiFocus-I subjects. It was found that CIS strategies implemented without using apical electrodes, which showed high levels of masking, could improve consonant identification.

Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects

Channel interactions were assessed using high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant subjects using the Ineraid electrode array. Stimulation currents were applied on one intracochlear electrode and their effects on psychophysical detection thresholds on an adjacent electrode were measured. Stimuli were trains of brief, biphasic, 50-micros/phase pulses presented at a rate of 2000 pulses per second per channel. In experiment I, we studied how the detection of a probe signal was influenced by a sub-threshold perturbation signal presented either simultaneously or non-simultaneously (with no overlap) on an adjacent electrode. Results showed that simultaneous activation led to strong channel interactions, producing threshold changes consistent with instantaneous electric field summation. Non-simultaneous activation revealed much weaker interactions, producing threshold changes of opposite sign. In experiment II, we studied how the temporal delay between perturbation and probe pulses, as well as how the level of the perturbation signal influenced non-simultaneous channel interactions. First, threshold changes when reversing the polarity of the perturbation did progressively vanish when increasing the delay between pulses. This suggested that non-overlapping stimulation of adjacent electrodes produced channel interactions that were in part due to residual polarization of the nerve membrane. Second, increasing the perturbation to supra-threshold levels produced threshold elevations that were independent of the interpulse interval. This suggested channel interactions due to neural masking. These results provide insights into the different concurrently active mechanisms of channel interactions in cochlear implant systems using this type of stimuli.

The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech

The present study examined the effects of short-term perceptual training on normal-hearing listeners' ability to adapt to spectrally altered speech patterns. Using noise-band vocoder processing, acoustic information was spectrally distorted by shifting speech information from one frequency region to another. Six subjects were tested with spectrally shifted sentences after five days of practice with upwardly shifted training sentences. Training with upwardly shifted sentences significantly improved recognition of upwardly shifted speech; recognition of downwardly shifted speech was nearly unchanged. Three subjects were later trained with downwardly shifted speech. Results showed that the mean improvement was comparable to that observed with the upwardly shifted training. In this retrain and retest condition, performance was largely unchanged for upwardly shifted sentence recognition, suggesting that these listeners had retained some of the improved speech perception resulting from the previous training. The results suggest that listeners are able to partially adapt to a spectral shift in acoustic speech patterns over the short-term, given sufficient training. However, the improvement was localized to where the spectral shift was trained, as no change in performance was observed for spectrally altered speech outside of the trained regions.

Simulation of artificial vision: I. Eccentric reading of isolated words, and perceptual learning

Simulations of artificial vision were performed to assess "minimum requirements for useful artificial vision". Retinal prostheses will be implanted at a fixed (and probably eccentric) location of the retina. To mimic this condition on normal observers, we projected stimuli of various sizes and content on a defined stabilised area of the visual field. In experiment 1, we asked subjects to read isolated 4-letter words presented at various degrees of pixelisation and at various eccentricities. Reading performance dropped abruptly when the number of pixels was reduced below a certain threshold. For central reading, a viewing area containing about 300 pixels was necessary for close to perfect reading (>90% correctly read words). At eccentricities beyond 10 degrees, close to perfect reading was never achieved even if more than 300 pixels were used. A control experiment using isolated letter recognition in the same conditions suggested that lower reading performance at high eccentricity was in part due to the "crowding effect". In experiment 2, we investigated whether the task of eccentric reading under such specific conditions could be improved by training. Two subjects, naive to this task, were trained to read pixelised 4-letter words presented at 15 degrees eccentricity. Reading performance of both subjects increased impressively throughout the experiment. Low initial reading scores (range 6%-23% correct) improved impressively (range 64%-85% correct) after about one month of training (about 1 h/day). Control tests demonstrated that the learning process consisted essentially in an adaptation to use an eccentric area of the retina for reading. These results indicate that functional retinal implants consisting of more than 300 stimulation contacts will be needed. They might successfully restore some reading abilities in blind patients, even if they have to be placed outside the foveal area. Reaching optimal performance may, however, require a significant adaptation process.

Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant

The goal of the present study was to investigate the time course of adaptation by experienced cochlear implant users to a shifted frequency-to-electrode assignment in their speech processors. Speech recognition performance of three Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users was measured over a 3-month period, during which the implant listeners continuously wore "experimental" speech processors that were purposely shifted by 2-4 mm in terms of the frequency-to-electrode assignment relative to their normal processor. Baseline speech performance was measured with each subject's clinically assigned speech processor just prior to implementation of the experimental processor. Baseline speech performance was measured again after the 3-month test period, immediately following the reinstallation of the clinically assigned processor settings. Speech performance with the experimental processor was measured four times during the first week, and weekly thereafter over the 3-month period. Results showed that the experimental processor produced significantly lower performance on all measures of speech recognition immediately following implementation. Over the 3-month test period, consonant and HINT sentence recognition with the experimental processors gradually approached a performance level comparable to but still significantly below the baseline and postexperiment measures made with the clinically assigned processor. However, vowel and TIMIT sentence recognition with the experimental processors remained far below the level of the baseline measures even at the end of the 3-month experimental period. There was no significant change in performance with the clinically assigned processor before or after fitting with the experimental processor. The results suggest that a long-time exposure to a new pattern of stimulation may not be able to compensate for the deficit in performance caused by a 2-4-mm shift in the tonotopic location of stimulation, at least within a 3-month period.

Phoneme recognition and confusions with multichannel cochlear implants: vowels

The aim of this study was to investigate how postlingually severely or profoundly hearing-impaired adults relearn to recognize vowels after receiving multichannel cochlear implants. Vowel recognition of 19 Finnish-speaking subjects was studied for a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 24 months using an open-set nonsense-syllable test in a prospective repeated-measure design. The responses were coded for phoneme errors, and 95% confidence intervals for recognition and confusions were calculated. The average vowel recognition was 68% (95% confidence interval = 66-70%) 6 months after switch-on and 80% (95% confidence interval = 78-82%) 24 months after switch-on. The vowels [ae], [u], [i], [o], and [a] were the easiest to recognize, and the vowels [y], [e], and [ø] were the most difficult. In conclusion, adaptation to electrical hearing using a multichannel cochlear implant was achieved well; but for at least 2 years, given two vowels with either F1 or F2 at roughly the some frequencies, confusions were drawn more towards the closest vowel with the next highest F1 or F2.

Phoneme recognition and confusions with multichannel cochlear implants: consonants

The aim of this study was to investigate how postlingually severely or profoundly hearing-impaired adults relearn to recognize consonants after receiving multichannel cochlear implants. Consonant recognition of 19 Finnish-speaking subjects was studied for a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 24 months using an open-set nonsense-syllable test in a prospective repeated-measure design. Responses were coded for phoneme errors, and proportions of correct responses and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for recognition and confusions. Two years after the switch-on, the mean recognition of consonants was 71% (95% confidence interval = 68-73%). The manner of articulation was easier to classify than the place of articulation, and the consonants [s], [r], [k], [t], [p], [n], and [j] were easier to recognize than [h], [m], [l], and [v]. Adaptation to electrical hearing with a multichannel cochlear implant was successful, but consonants with alveolar, palatal, or velar transitions (high F2) were better recognized than consonants with labial transitions (low F2). The locus of the F2 transitions of the consonants with better recognition was at the frequencies 1.5-2 kHz, whereas the locus of the F2 transitions of the consonants with poorer recognition was at 1.2-1.4 kHz. A tendency to confuse consonants with the closest consonant with higher F2 transition was also noted.

Frequency mapping in cochlear implants

OBJECTIVE

To understand the short-term ("acute") effects of parametric variations to the frequency-to-electrode mapping on phoneme identification by Nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners.

METHODS

Phoneme recognition was measured in five Nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners using custom four-channel continuous interleaved sampler (CIS) processors. For the four-channel processors, speech signals were band-pass filtered into four broad frequency bands. The temporal envelope in each band was extracted by half-wave rectification and low-pass filtering at 160 Hz. The extracted envelope was then transformed to electric currents by a power function with an exponent of 0.2. The resulting electric currents were delivered to four electrode pairs (18,22), (13,17), (8,12), (3,7). The effect of frequency-to-electrode mapping was investigated by systematically varying the parameters of band-pass filters while fixing the electrode locations. Experiment 1 measured phoneme recognition as a function of the slope of band-pass filters. The slope of band-pass filters varied from 48 dB/octave to 6 dB/octave; the corner frequencies of band-pass filters were not varied. Experiment 2 measured phoneme recognition as a function of the distribution of band-pass filters across a fixed overall frequency range. The frequency divisions of a fixed overall frequency range were systematically varied from a logarithmic to a linear distribution. Experiment 3 measured phoneme recognition as a function of the bandwidth of the band-pass filters. The bandwidth of each filter varied from 0.2 to 2 octaves; the center frequencies for each band were not varied. No practice or feedback was provided for subjects in all experiments.

RESULTS

The slope of the band-pass filters had little effect on both vowel and consonant recognition. A slight performance drop was observed for only the shallowest slope condition (6 dB/octave). In contrast, the distribution of the band-pass filters had a strong effect on vowel recognition but a weak effect on consonant recognition. Best performance was achieved when a logarithmic or near-logarithmic frequency distribution was used to divide the overall frequency range. The bandwidth of the band-pass filters had a moderate effect on both vowel and consonant recognition. Vowel scores dropped significantly when the bandwidth of filters was too broad, whereas consonant scores dropped significantly when a narrower bandwidth was used.

CONCLUSION

Under "acute" testing conditions, phoneme recognition with a four-channel CIS strategy seems to be only mildly affected by the slope of the band-pass filters, but can be significantly affected by the distribution of filters as well as the bandwidth of the filters. Optimal or near-optimal performance can be achieved with a logarithmic frequency distribution. Vowels are more susceptible to broad bandwidths, whereas consonants are more susceptible to narrow bandwidths.

Effects of the acoustical dynamic range on speech recognition with cochlear implants

The amplitude compression function in a speech processor for cochlear implants maps the wide acoustical dynamic range of sounds into the smaller electrical dynamic range available on the implanted electrodes. In this study, we examined the effects of systematic variations of the acoustical dynamic range of the compression function on speech recognition with cochlear implants. Statistical measures of the amplitude distribution of speech sounds were made in each channel of a research speech processor providing more than 50 dB of input signal-to-noise ratio. Several systematic variations of the dynamic range of the compression function were implemented on this basis, and speech recognition was determined using vowel and consonant identification tests in three experienced cochlear implant users. Results demonstrated that the acoustical dynamic range of the compression function does have a significant effect on speech recognition with cochlear implants. They suggest that a dynamic range of about 45 dB is necessary for optimal speech recognition.