Two rapid-dose titrations of sertindole in patients with schizophrenia

Antipsychotic dose reduction compared to dose continuation for people with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic drugs are the mainstay treatment for schizophrenia, yet they are associated with diverse and potentially dose-related side effects which can reduce quality of life. For this reason, the lowest possible doses of antipsychotics are generally recommended, but higher doses are often used in clinical practice. It is still unclear if and how antipsychotic doses could be reduced safely in order to minimise the adverse-effect burden without increasing the risk of relapse.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of reducing antipsychotic dose compared to continuing the current dose for people with schizophrenia.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a systematic search on 10 February 2021 at the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials, which is based on CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN, and WHO ICTRP. We also inspected the reference lists of included studies and previous reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any dose reduction against continuation in people with schizophrenia or related disorders who were stabilised on their current antipsychotic treatment.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently screened relevant records for inclusion, extracted data from eligible studies, and assessed the risk of bias using RoB 2. We contacted study authors for missing data and additional information. Our primary outcomes were clinically important change in quality of life,  rehospitalisations and dropouts due to adverse effects; key secondary outcomes were clinically important change in functioning, relapse, dropouts for any reason, and at least one adverse effect. We also examined scales measuring symptoms, quality of life, and functioning as well as a comprehensive list of specific adverse effects. We pooled outcomes at the endpoint preferably closest to one year. We evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 25 RCTs, of which 22 studies provided data with 2635 participants (average age 38.4 years old). The median study sample size was 60 participants (ranging from 18 to 466 participants) and length was 37 weeks (ranging from 12 weeks to 2 years). There were variations in the dose reduction strategies in terms of speed of reduction (i.e. gradual in about half of the studies (within 2 to 16 weeks) and abrupt in the other half), and in terms of degree of reduction (i.e. median planned reduction of 66% of the dose up to complete withdrawal in three studies). We assessed risk of bias across outcomes predominantly as some concerns or high risk.  No study reported data on the number of participants with a clinically important change in quality of life or functioning, and only eight studies reported continuous data on scales measuring quality of life or functioning. There was no difference between dose reduction and continuation on scales measuring quality of life (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.17 to 0.15, 6 RCTs, n = 719, I2 = 0%, moderate certainty evidence) and scales measuring functioning (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.17, 6 RCTs, n = 966, I2 = 0%, high certainty evidence). Dose reduction in comparison to continuation may increase the risk of rehospitalisation based on data from eight studies with estimable effect sizes; however, the 95% CI does not exclude the possibility of no difference (risk ratio (RR) 1.53, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.81, 8 RCTs, n = 1413, I2 = 59% (moderate heterogeneity), very low certainty evidence). Similarly, dose reduction increased the risk of relapse based on data from 20 studies (RR 2.16, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.06, 20 RCTs, n = 2481, I2 = 70% (substantial heterogeneity), low certainty evidence).   More participants in the dose reduction group in comparison to the continuation group left the study early due to adverse effects (RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.49, 6 RCTs with estimable effect sizes, n = 1079, I2 = 0%, moderate certainty evidence) and for any reason (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.81, 12 RCTs, n = 1551, I2 = 48% (moderate heterogeneity), moderate certainty evidence). Lastly, there was no difference between the dose reduction and continuation groups in the number of participants with at least one adverse effect based on data from four studies with estimable effect sizes (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.12, 5 RCTs, n = 998 (4 RCTs, n = 980 with estimable effect sizes), I2 = 0%, moderate certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review synthesised the latest evidence on the reduction of antipsychotic doses for stable individuals with schizophrenia. There was no difference between dose reduction and continuation groups in quality of life, functioning, and number of participants with at least one adverse effect. However, there was a higher risk for relapse and dropouts, and potentially for rehospitalisations, with dose reduction. Of note, the majority of the trials focused on relapse prevention rather potential beneficial outcomes on quality of life, functioning, and adverse effects, and in some studies there was rapid and substantial reduction of doses. Further well-designed RCTs are therefore needed to provide more definitive answers.

Orthostatic hypotensive effect of antipsychotic drugs in Wistar rats by in vivo and in vitro studies of alpha1-adrenoceptor function

RATIONALE

Many antipsychotics cause orthostatic hypotension possibly due to antagonist action on resistance vessel alpha1A-adrenoceptors (alpha1A-AR).

OBJECTIVE

We have tested this possibility by determining in Wistar rats how the orthostatic hypotensive effect of several antipsychotic drugs compares with their affinity for adrenoceptors in mesenteric small arteries (MSA with mainly alpha1A-AR) and aorta (mainly alpha1D-AR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a tilt setup, orthostatic hypotension was measured in anaesthetized rats for prazosin and the antipsychotics haloperidol, sertindole, risperidone, clozapine, ziprasidone, domperidone, olanzapine, and aripiprazole. For in vitro studies, segments of MSA and aorta were mounted on a wire myograph for isometric tension recording. Cumulative concentration-response curves were constructed to phenylephrine (PE) in the absence and presence of the drugs. Apparent affinity (pA2) was calculated by Schild analysis.

RESULTS

Prazosin antagonized tilt-induced and PE responses in both studies (threshold 4 ng/ml, pA2 9.52 MSA, 10.1 aorta). The rank order of the potency of the antipsychotics in the tilt experiments correlated (r2 = 0.69, P = 0.01) with the pA2-values in MSA: Risperidone and sertindole had the highest potency in the tilt test (threshold 159 and 97 ng/ml) and the highest apparent affinity in MSA (pA2 8.92 and 8.78), in contrast with aripiprazole and domperidone, which had the lowest in each case (threshold 4.1 and 3.0 microg/ml, pA2 7.17 and 6.99). In aorta, the pA2 values did not correlate with the in vivo potencies; in particular, sertindole had no functional affinity in aorta.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the orthostatic hypotensive effect in rats of the antipsychotic drugs investigated is mediated through alpha1A-ARs.

Beat-to-Beat variability of repolarization determines proarrhythmic outcome in dogs susceptible to drug-induced torsades de pointes

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether increasing or decreasing beat-to-beat variability of repolarization (BVR) would change drug-induced proarrhythmic outcome accordingly.

BACKGROUND

Increased variability of repolarization has been suggested as a prelude to proarrhythmic circumstances in experimental and clinical situations.

METHODS

The non-cardiovascular, I(Kr)-blocking drug sertindole was administered to anesthetized dogs with chronic atrioventricular block. Three interventions were used to prevent or suppress sertindole-induced torsades de pointes (TdP).

RESULTS

Supratherapeutic doses of sertindole (1.0 mg/kg intravenously) induced TdP in 10 of 13 dogs whereas 0.2 mg/kg induced no TdP, despite increases in QT intervals by both doses. The BVR, quantified as short-term variability (STV) from Poincaré plots, was the only parameter that predicted TdP outcome (1.0 mg/kg sertindole: 2.3 +/- 0.7 ms to 5.1 +/- 2.1 ms, p < 0.05; 0.2 mg/kg sertindole: 2.3 +/- 0.8 ms to 3.2 +/- 1.1 ms, p= NS).

INTERVENTIONS

1) KCl, intravenous, reduced the incidence of sertindole-induced TdP from 6 of 7 to 1 of 7 dogs (p<0.05) and prevented sertindole-related increase of STV: 3.0 +/- 1.1 ms vs. 4.5 +/- 1.3 ms (p < 0.05); 2) levcromakalim (I(K,ATP) activator) reduced sertindole-induced TdP and decreased STV from 4.9 +/- 2.1 ms to 2.6 +/- 0.9 ms (p < 0.05); 3) steady-state ventricular pacing (60 beats/min) abolished sertindole-induced TdP and decreased STV from 4.9 +/- 1.5 to 3.2 +/- 1.0 (p < 0.05). Torsades de pointes reappeared upon return to non-paced idioventricular rhythm. None of the 3 interventions reduced the sertindole-induced prolonged QT interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Proarrhythmic intervention is related to an increase in BVR, whereas antiarrhythmic treatment is associated with a decrease in BVR. The BVR is superior to QT interval prolongation in the prediction and prevention of drug-induced TdP in this experimental model.

Tolerability of atypical antipsychotics

Atypical antipsychotics are expected to be better tolerated than older antipsychotics because of their lower propensity to cause certain adverse effects. All atypical drugs have been shown to cause fewer acute extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) than a standard typical agent (usually haloperidol) and some (clozapine, sertindole and quetiapine) appear to cause these effects no more often than placebo. In the longer term, clozapine, olanzapine and (less robustly) other atypical antipsychotics are thought to cause less tardive dyskinesia than typical antipsychotics. Problems caused by hyperprolactinaemia occur less often with some atypical antipsychotics than with typical drugs although risperidone and amisulpride appear to have no advantages in this respect. Other adverse effects may occur as frequently with some atypical antipsychotics as with some typical drugs. Clozapine, risperidone and quetiapine are known to cause postural hypotension; clozapine, olanzapine and quetiapine are clearly sedative; and anticholinergic effects are commonly seen with clozapine, and, much less frequently, with olanzapine. Some adverse effects are more frequent with atypical drugs. Idiosyncratic effects seem particularly troublesome with clozapine and, to a lesser extent, sertindole, olanzapine and zotepine. Bodyweight gain is probably more problematic with atypical antipsychotics than with typical drugs. Overall tolerability, as judged by withdrawals from therapy, is not clearly proven to be better with atypical drugs, although some individual trials do indicate an advantage with atypical agents. Differences in tolerability between individual atypical antipsychotics have not been clearly shown. The tolerability profile of atypical drugs certainly benefits from a lower incidence of acute EPS effects, along with less certain or less uniform benefits in symptomatic hyperprolactinaemia or tardive dyskinesia. Other, perhaps more trivial, adverse effects militate against their good tolerability, and effects such as bodyweight gain may severely reduce tolerability. Without clear advantages in tolerability in patient groups used in trials, drug choice in regard to adverse effects should continue to be on a patient to patient basis.

Modeling of sertindole pharmacokinetic disposition in healthy volunteers in short term dose-escalation studies

The pharmacokinetics of sertindole were studied in young, healthy volunteers after single and multiple oral dose administered under an escalating manner. In a low-dose study (study 1), subjects received 4-8 mg with a maintenance dose period of 7 days. In a high-dose study (study 2), subjects received 4 mg daily for 2 days, and the dose was increased by 4 mg increments every third day until reaching 20 mg daily. The mean terminal t 1,2 was 73 h after the final 8 mg dose in study 1 and 60 h after the 20 mg dose in study 2. The terminal elimination phase appeared to be monophasic in all the study subjects, suggesting that Michaelis-Menten saturable metabolism was not involved in the elimination of sertindole. Compartmental analyses suggested that the disproportional increase of the Cmax and AUC values from 4 mg to 20 mg during multiple dosing may be explained by saturable presystemic elimination of sertindole, leading to a higher fraction of sertindole available for absorption at higher doses.