Gastrin, gastric emptying, and gastroesophageal reflux after ranitidine

Oesophageal transit, disintegration and gastric emptying of a film-coated risedronate placebo tablet in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and normal control subjects

BACKGROUND

Risedronate sodium is a pyridinyl bisphosphonate, proven effective for the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and Paget's disease of the bone.

AIM

To compare the oesophageal transit, disintegration and gastric emptying of the commercial film-coated risedronate tablet in subjects with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and normal control subjects.

METHODS

A total of 30 subjects, 15 patients with GERD and 15 age- and sex-matched, normal control subjects, participated in a single-centre, open-label, comparative gamma scintigraphy study. The GERD subjects had active erosive oesophagitis within 4 weeks prior to dosing.

RESULTS

The mean oesophageal transit (GERD, 4.4 s; controls, 3.1 s), mean disintegration (GERD, 21.8 min; controls, 19.2 min) and mean gastric emptying (GERD, 15.9 min; controls, 15.0 min) were similar in the two subject groups. The oesophageal transit is rapid and given the rapid disintegration and gastric emptying, oesophageal contact occurring via reflux of risedronate was unlikely since most, if not all, of the dosage form exited from the stomach within 30 min.

CONCLUSIONS

The oval shape and film-coating on the commercial risedronate tablet promotes rapid oesophageal transit and minimizes oesophageal contact, even in the high-risk GERD population.

Ranitidine increases the bioavailability of imbibed alcohol by accelerating gastric emptying

To investigate the mechanism of the increase in alcohol bioavailability by ranitidine, we determined by nuclear scan the changes in gastric emptying of a 10% ethanol solution (containing 0.3 g ethanol/kg body weight and 300 microCi of technetium-labeled diethylene triamine pentacetic acid) in 8 normal men, before and after treatment with 300 mg ranitidine orally each evening for 1 week. We compared these changes with those of ethanol bioavailability, calculated by integration of the Michaelis-Menten function over the entire alcohol curves after random i.v. and, on a separate day, oral administration of the same ethanol dose, pre- and post-ranitidine. With ranitidine, we found an acceleration of gastric emptying in 7 of 8 subjects, with 20% shortening of the time to 50% emptying (51.8 +/- 4.1 min vs 64.3 +/- 3.4, without ranitidine; P < .001 by paired t test). Despite the disappearance (from the stomach) of most of the dose by the end of the blood alcohol curves, only 83 +/- 4% reached the systemic blood vs 64 +/- 4% without ranitidine (P < .02), most likely because of a shortened exposure of alcohol dehydrogenase to optimal ethanol concentrations. As a result, after oral but not intravenous alcohol administration, ranitidine increased blood alcohol concentrations (29 +/- 4 mg/dl vs 22 +/- 3, without ranitidine; P < .02), with a corresponding decrease in first pass metabolism of ethanol from 107 +/- 16 mg/kg to 47 +/- 16 (P < .01).

Ranitidine bismuth citrate and ranitidine do not affect gastric emptying of a radio-labelled liquid meal

Ranitidine bismuth citrate, a new chemical entity which is a salt complex of ranitidine and bismuth citrate, is being developed for the treatment of relapse of benign gastric and duodenal ulcer and eradication of Helicobacter pylori. The aim of the present study was to establish whether ranitidine bismuth citrate (800 mg) or ranitidine hydrochloride (300 mg) have any effect on gastric emptying of a liquid meal using gamma scintigraphy. On three separate occasions, each of twelve subjects received a single oral tablet of 800 mg ranitidine bismuth citrate, 300 mg ranitidine hydrochloride or placebo in random order. Thirty minutes after dosing each subject was given 375 ml of 99mTc-DTPA (diethylene triaminepentaacetic acid) labelled Clinifeed-ISO. The primary endpoint was the time to 50% gastric emptying (t50%). The proportion of the meal remaining was summarised by weighted mean proportion of the meal remaining in the stomach over 0-60 min and 0-180 min, separately. No differences were observed for t50%, weighted mean 0-60 min, and weighted mean 0-180 min between any two treatments. In man, we have detected no significant effect of single oral doses of ranitidine bismuth citrate 800 mg or ranitidine hydrochloride 300 mg on the rate of gastric emptying of a liquid meal when compared with placebo.

Ranitidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases

Ranitidine, a histamine H2-receptor antagonist, is now well established as a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion effective in the treatment and prophylaxis of gastrointestinal lesions aggravated by gastric acid secretion. Therapeutic trials involving several thousands of patients with peptic ulcer disease confirm that ranitidine 300mg daily administered orally in single or divided doses is at least as effective as cimetidine 800 to 1000mg daily in increasing the rate of healing of duodenal and gastric ulcers. Similar dosages of ranitidine have been shown to relieve the symptoms of reflux oesophagitis and heal or prevent gastrointestinal damage caused by ulcerogenic drugs. Ranitidine 150mg orally at night maintains ulcer healing in the long term. Ranitidine has also demonstrated good results in the treatment of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and in the prevention of aspiration pneumonitis when given prior to surgery and to pregnant women at full term. It may also have a place in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding and in the prevention of stress ulcers in the intensive care setting, although these areas require further investigation. Ranitidine has been used safely in obstetric patients during labour, in children, the elderly, and in patients with renal impairment when given in appropriate dosages. The drug is very well tolerated and is only infrequently associated with serious adverse reactions or clinically significant drug interactions. Even at high dosages, ranitidine appears devoid of antiandrogenic effects. Ranitidine is clearly comparable or superior to most other antiulcer agents in the treatment and prevention of a variety of gastrointestinal disorders associated with gastric acid secretion. With its favourable efficacy and tolerability profiles, ranitidine must be considered a first-line agent when suppression of gastric acid secretion is indicated.

Multifocal gastric carcinoid tumours, achlorhydria, and hypergastrinaemia

Multiple polypoidal carcinoid tumours of the stomach were found in 5 patients with achlorhydria (4 of whom had pernicious anaemia) as a result of autoimmune atrophic gastritis. The tumours were small (nearly all less than 1 cm diameter) and appeared to grow very slowly, if at all; no significant enlargement or complications were seen during periods of observation of up to 6 years. No extragastric hormonal syndromes were identified. They differed from the carcinoid tumours usually found in the intestinal tract by being composed of argyrophil (not argentaffin) cells of the enterochromaffin-like (ECL) type. Fasting plasma levels of gastrin, which is believed to be trophic to ECL cells, were very high in all patients. Thus, chronic hyperplasia of gastric ECL cells (as a result of hypergastrinaemia) may have been responsible for development of the tumours. Long-term, uninterrupted achlorhydria produced by potent inhibitors of gastric acid secretion might therefore predispose to carcinoid tumours of the stomach.

Comparison of cimetidine and ranitidine on 24-hour intragastric acidity and serum gastrin profile in patients with esophagitis

Twenty-four-hour intragastric pH and serum gastrin profiles were monitored in six male asymptomatic patients who previously were found to have esophagitis on endoscopy and biopsy. They received cimetidine 300 mg qid (C), ranitidine 150 mg bid (R), or placebo (P) for one week each, utilizing the Latin-square design. The mean BAO was 0.4 +/- 0.2 mmol/hr, and the pentagastrin-stimulated MAO was 21.2 +/- 3.2 mmol/hr. In the P-treated patients, the pH fluctuated between 1.8 and 3.5 and over 90% of the readings were less than pH 4. As compared to P, both C and R significantly suppressed H+ after breakfast, overnight, and over the 24-hr period. The mean pH after lunch was significantly higher in R than in P, but not in C. Over the 24-hr period, a higher percentage of the readings were above pH 4.0 in R as compared to C. During the night, 50% of the pH readings were above pH 4.0 in C and R, whereas in P 50% of the pH readings were less than pH 2.0. The integrated gastrin responses after each meal were similar in C and R and were greater than in P. The biphasic response of the ratio of H+ and gastrin (H+/G) following each meal was suppressed by both H2-receptor antagonists, with numerically lower values obtained in R than in C. This study suggests that ranitidine 150 mg bid is superior to cimetidine 300 mg qid in suppressing the 24-hr intragastric acidity.

Measurement of esophageal reflux by scintigraphy

Gastroesophageal reflux and clearance of the refluxed material can be measured by plotting a time-activity curve from an esophageal area of interest after 1 mCi of 99mTc sulfur colloid is placed in the stomach. Control subjects do not have peaks exceeding a value twice that of the baseline count levels. Reflux patients exceed this value, either spontaneously or after Valsalva maneuvers. This technique has a sensitivity which is greater than that of barium and equal to the sensitivity of a pH probe in patients with both moderate and severe reflux. Scintigraphic reflux was shown in 62% of moderate refluxes and 85% of those with severe reflux as defined clinically. Clearing of the refluxed material occurs rapidly in most patients if measured by this scintigraphic technique. This test can be performed rapidly with minimal radiation exposure and is noninvasive.