Risperidone in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a meta-analysis

IUPHAR review: Moving beyond dopamine-based therapeutic strategies for schizophrenia

In the following we comprehensively review approaches to treating schizophrenia that do not primarily involve dopamine antagonism or partial agonism. Following 70 years of broadly similar dopamine D2 receptor antagonist/partial agonist drugs, Cobenfy™ was approved as a novel antipsychotic in September 2024. Cobenfy™ is a combination formulation of xanomeline, a muscarinic cholinergic M1/M4 receptor agonist and trospium, a peripherally restricted muscarinic antagonist included to offset peripheral side effects of xanomeline. This approval has reinvigorated optimism in the field and raised important questions for the future direction of antipsychotic drug development. We review therapeutic strategies beyond dopamine that have been and are currently being investigated to address whether there are a sufficient number of novel approaches to maintain the momentum of this breakthrough and question why it has taken so long. The current pipeline of late-stage compounds is low and potentially constrained by historical setbacks and challenges in clinical trial design for schizophrenia. This success rate has future potential to improve given the range of biomarkers in development designed to enable greater precision in future clinical trials. Cobenfy™ approval demonstrates that with combination formulations designed to improve side effect profiles and optimised clinical trial design it is possible to generate tolerable and efficacious treatment options for patients beyond a solely dopaminergic framework. We conclude that advances in understanding the neurobiology of schizophrenia, while not complete, has generated a diverse and well justified pool of potentially novel and repurpose-ready approaches, with mechanisms beyond simple dopamine D2 antagonism/partial agonism.

Pharmacological Treatments of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia-An Update

Schizophrenia is a chronic psychotic disorder comprising positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive deficits. Negative symptoms are associated with stigma, worse functional outcomes, and a significant deterioration in quality of life. Clinical diagnosis is challenging despite its significance, and current treatments offer little improvement in the burden of negative symptoms. This article reviews current pharmacological strategies for treating negative symptoms. Dopaminergic, glutamatergic, serotonergic, noradrenergic, cholinergic, anti-inflammatory compounds, hormones, and psychostimulants are explored. Finally, we review pharmacological global treatment guidelines for negative symptoms. In general, switching to a second-generation antipsychotic seems to be most often recommended for patients with schizophrenia on first-generation antipsychotics, and an add-on antidepressant is considered when depression is also present. However, the treatment of negative symptoms remains an unmet need. Future, larger clinical studies and meta-analyses are needed to establish effective pharmacological agents for the effective treatment of negative symptoms.

Single trajectory treatment response for predominant negative symptoms: Post-hoc analysis of a clinical trial with cariprazine and risperidone

Examining the heterogeneity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia contributes to the identification of available treatment targets. Generally, prior evidence classified three to four symptom treatment response trajectory groups over the course of positive symptoms, yet, no evidence exists regarding the heterogeneity of medium-term response to predominant negative symptoms. The current post-hoc analysis aims to identify the heterogeneity in negative symptom treatment response trajectories among patients with predominant negative symptoms who received either cariprazine or risperidone for 26 weeks. Treatment response was analyzed based on the: the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Factor Score for Negative Symptoms (PANSS-FSNS), and the Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGIS) and Improvement (CGII) scales. To identify subgroups of patients with a similar course of treatment response, group-based trajectory modelling was utilized. Results demonstrated that in comparison with competing models, a single trajectory best described the treatment response of patients with predominant negative symptoms. The results indicate that patients with predominant negative symptoms with over ten years of schizophrenia respond rapidly to adequate treatment and follow a course of steady improvement.

Treating schizophrenia: the quality of evidence behind treatment recommendations and how it can improve

OBJECTIVE

To assess the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews that comprise the American Psychiatric Association (APA) Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Schizophrenia and to determine the extent to which results from Cochrane systematic reviews published after guideline development would alter or confirm current recommendations.

PARTICIPANTS

Systematic reviews that underpinned recommendations in the APA guidelines and Cochrane systematic reviews.

MAIN OUTCOME

Three independent reviewers scored all systematic reviews referenced in the guideline for quality and reporting using AMSTAR and PRISMA checklist, respectively. Items in both tools were individually graded and compared to identify consistently low-performing areas within the systematic reviews. Post hoc analysis of the Cochrane systematic reviews since the latest revision of APA's guidelines were performed to determine whether their findings were congruent with recent recommendations.

RESULTS

The mean score of the 57 reviews on the PRISMA checklist was 70%. The mean AMSTAR score was 6.8, correlating with a moderate quality score. Post hoc analysis revealed that 171 Cochrane reviews had been published since the APA guideline release. Only half of the reviews of pharmacological interventions confirmed current recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The methodological quality of the systematic reviews included in the APA guideline was deficient in key areas. Our study brings to light the importance of using high-quality evidence in the development of clinical practice guidelines. An updated APA guideline (last updated in 2009) is necessary to provide the highest quality treatment recommendations for clinicians in the management of schizophrenia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN-CTR, UMIN000023099.

Antipsychotic agents. Gradually improving treatment from the traditional oral neuroleptics to the first atypical depot

Relapse is one of the key factors in the long-term outcome of schizophrenia. The consequences of relapse are diverse and often unpredictable, and the time to recovery and degree of recovery worsen with each successive relapse. There is now overwhelming evidence that advances in antipsychotic drug treatment have led to significant reductions in the rate of relapse. This review charts the developments that have taken place in antipsychotic therapy from the introduction of depot formulations, through atypical agents, to the development of the first long-acting atypical antipsychotic. Depot formulations of conventional antipsychotics were developed in the 1960s and led to fewer relapses and episodes of hospitalization, compared with oral equivalents. Meta-analysis has confirmed that patients receiving depot antipsychotics experience significantly greater global improvement than those receiving the respective oral agents. Conventional antipsychotics are, however, associated with a range of potentially serious adverse events. The atypical antipsychotics were introduced in the 1990s and have significant advantages over conventional agents with regard to positive and negative symptoms. There is also evidence that atypical agents can reduce the risk of relapse. Importantly, atypical antipsychotics have an improved safety profile compared with older agents, particularly with regard to extrapyramidal symptoms. One disadvantage of atypical agents has been that they are only available in an oral form. The recent development of a long-acting injectable formulation of risperidone means that a new treatment option is available to physicians.

Meta-analytic study of the benefits and risks of treating chronic schizophrenia with risperidone or conventional neuroleptics

Data from six randomised, controlled, comparative studies of risperidone and conventional neuroleptics (haloperidol, zuclopenthixol and perphenazine) in the treatment of 911 patients with chronic schizophrenia were analysed to estimate the benefits and risks of treatment. Efficacy and risk of treatment were assessed by means of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS). An effect size (difference between treatments) was calculated from the PANSS and ESRS scores. The effect size of antipsychotic effect favoured risperidone (sizes ranged from 0.22 to 0.37 on the PANSS subscales), and the effect size of safety also favoured risperidone (sizes ranged from 0.18 to 0.36 on the ESRS). An analysis of the proportions of patients requiring antiparkinsonian medication produced an effect size of 0.37 (20% of risperidone patients and 38% of patients receiving a conventional neuroleptic required antiparkinsonian medication). These data indicate that risperidone is a more effective antipsychotic than the conventional agents and causes less severe extrapyramidal symptoms.

White-matter connectivity related to paliperidone treatment response in patients with schizophrenia

The objective of this study was to examine whether white-matter (WM) connectivity of patients with schizophrenia at early stage of treatment is related to treatment response after paliperidone extended-release (ER) treatment. Forty-one patients with schizophrenia and 17 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects were included in this study. Brain magnetic resonance scans at 3 Tesla were conducted at early stage of treatment. Voxel-wise statistical analysis of the fractional anisotropy (FA) data was performed using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics. At baseline and eight weeks after paliperidone treatment, patients were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms. Among the patients with schizophrenia, the FA values of the corpus callosum, corona radiata, internal capsule, external capsule, superior longitudinal fasciculus and fronto-temporal WM regions showed significant negative correlations with scores of the treatment response. The current study suggests that the treatment response after paliperidone ER treatment may be associated with the fronto-temporo-limbic WM connectivity at early stage of treatment in patients with schizophrenia, and it could be used as a predictor of treatment response to paliperidone ER treatment after studies with large samples verify these results.

Dosing and switching of paliperidone ER in patients with schizophrenia: recommendations for clinical practice

Many patients with schizophrenia receive long-term treatment with antipsychotic medication. Switching of antipsychotic medication due to lack of efficacy, tolerability issues, and partial/non-adherence is common. Despite this, consensus strategies for switching between antipsychotics are lacking. This manuscript provides practical recommendations for switching antipsychotic medication to ensure optimal management of patients with schizophrenia, with a particular focus on paliperidone extended release (ER). The authors drew on their clinical experience supported by detailed discussion of literature describing antipsychotic switching techniques and strategies and findings from paliperidone ER clinical trials. Antipsychotic switching strategies should be individualized and take into consideration the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of the pre- and post-switch medication. The use of temporary concomitant medications may be appropriate in some scenarios. Abrupt withdrawal of pre-switch medication may be appropriate in some instances but carries a greater risk of rebound and withdrawal symptoms than other strategies. Cross-tapering is the method most widely used in clinical practice. Paliperidone ER can be initiated without dose titration. The EU SmPC recommended dose of paliperidone ER is 6 mg/day; but doses should be individualized within the approved range of 3-12 mg/day. Higher doses may be required due to insufficient efficacy of the previous antipsychotic or in patients with acute symptoms. Recently diagnosed patients, those with renal impairment, or patients who have previously experienced tolerability issues with other antipsychotics may require lower doses. When switching from risperidone, higher doses of paliperidone ER may be required compared with risperidone. When switching from antipsychotics that have sedative and/or significant anticholinergic activity, the pre-switch antipsychotic should be tapered off gradually. Antipsychotics with less sedating and little anticholinergic activity can be tapered off over a shorter period. Temporary concomitant sedative medication may be beneficial when switching from antipsychotics with relatively higher sedative propensities. Switching from another antipsychotic to paliperidone ER requires individualized switching strategies and dosing, dependent on the characteristics of the patient and the PK and PD properties of the pre-switch medication. Cross-tapering strategies should be considered as a means of reducing the risk of rebound and withdrawal symptoms.

Changes in plasma concentrations of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone and the associated clinical effects during the switch from oral risperidone to extended-release paliperidone tablets in patients with schizophrenia

This study aimed to investigate changes in plasma concentrations of risperidone and 9-hydroxy-risperidone (9-OHR) and the associated clinical effects when switching from oral risperidone to extended-release (ER) paliperidone in patients with schizophrenia. This study included 25 patients with schizophrenia. Following a one-week screening period with a stable dose of risperidone, a six-week open-label switch study from risperidone to extended-release paliperidone (paliperidone ER) was conducted. Efficacy and safety assessments were performed on Day 1 and at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6. Plasma levels of the active fractions of oral risperidone and paliperidone ER were measured on Day 1 and at Week 1, respectively. Plasma levels of the active moiety (risperidone plus 9-OHR) while taking risperidone (mean dose: 4.0 mg) were significantly higher than plasma levels of 9-OHR while taking 6 mg of paliperidone ER. For 12 subjects taking only 3 mg of risperidone, plasma concentrations of the active moiety of risperidone were also significantly higher than those of 9-OHR while taking 6 mg of paliperidone ER. The amount of reduction in plasma levels was correlated with a temporal deterioration of clinical symptoms. These findings suggest that for patients with schizophrenia taking 3 mg or more of risperidone, an initial switching dose of 6 mg of paliperidone ER may be relatively low in terms of subsequent plasma concentrations and the associated clinical response.

[Psychosis, cardiovascular risk and associated mortality: are we on the right track?]

Patients with psychotic disorders have a higher risk of early mortality. In addition to unnatural causes (accidents, suicide), death due to cardiovascular (CV) reasons is two to four times more prevalent in these patients than in the general population. This non-systematic review of MEDLINE aims to clarify the role of all the determining factors are involved. Psychotic disorders are related to unhealthy life habits such as smoking, poor diet and physical inactivity. Neuroleptic drugs have also been studied as triggers of obesity and metabolic syndrome. Therefore, psychotic patients seem predisposed to suffer from several of the «classic» CV risk factors. It is not surprising that their scores on the CV risk scales (Framingham, SCORE) are higher than the general population. We also found publications that showed poorer management of primary and secondary prevention of CV disease. In addition, some biochemical factors (plasma levels of cortisol, ACTH, homocysteine, PCR) may indicate a vulnerability in psychosis per se, as well as the findings on hyperglycemia and insulin resistance in psychotic "drug naive" patients. These "non-classical" factors could alter the validity of CV risk scales designed for the general population. Furthermore, antipsychotic drugs could control intrinsic factors of psychosis (they have shown to reduce global mortality), and their role in CV mortality is not clear.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia, part 1: update 2012 on the acute treatment of schizophrenia and the management of treatment resistance

These updated guidelines are based on a first edition of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia published in 2005. For this 2012 revision, all available publications pertaining to the biological treatment of schizophrenia were reviewed systematically to allow for an evidence-based update. These guidelines provide evidence-based practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful and these guidelines are intended to be used by all physicians diagnosing and treating people suffering from schizophrenia. Based on the first version of these guidelines, a systematic review of the MEDLINE/PUBMED database and the Cochrane Library, in addition to data extraction from national treatment guidelines, has been performed for this update. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into six levels of evidence (A-F; Bandelow et al. 2008b, World J Biol Psychiatry 9:242). This first part of the updated guidelines covers the general descriptions of antipsychotics and their side effects, the biological treatment of acute schizophrenia and the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Influence of ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of risperidone in healthy subjects with CYP2D6*10/*10

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to investigate the combined influence of genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1 and CYP2D6 genes on risperidone pharmacokinetics.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Seventy-two healthy Korean volunteers receiving a single oral dose of 2 mg risperidone were included in this study.

KEY RESULTS

Significant differences were observed between the ABCB1 3435C>T genotypes for the pharmacokinetic parameters (peak serum concentration) of risperidone and the active moiety (risperidone and its main metabolite, 9-hydroxyrisperidone). There were no significant differences in the area under the serum concentration-time curves of risperidone and the active moiety among the ABCB1 2677G>T/A and 3435C>T genotypes. However, the peak serum concentration and area under the serum concentration-time curves were significantly different among the ABCB1 3435C>T genotypes in CYP2D6*10/*10.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These findings indicate that polymorphisms of ABCB1 3435C>T in individuals with CYP2D6*10/*10, which has low metabolic activity, could play an important role in the potential adverse effects or toxicity of risperidone.

Role of dopamine D(2) receptors for antipsychotic activity

This review summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding the proposed mechanisms by which antipsychotic agents reduce the symptoms of schizophrenia while giving rise to adverse side effects. The first part summarizes the contribution of neuroimaging studies to our understanding of the neurochemical substrates of schizophrenia, putting emphasis on direct evidence suggestive of a presynaptic rather than a postsynaptic dysregulation of dopaminergic neurotransmission in this disorder. The second part addresses the role of D(2) and non-D(2) receptor blockade in the treatment of schizophrenia and highlights a preponderant role of D(2) receptors in the mechanism of antipsychotic action. Neuroimaging studies have defined a narrow, but optimal, therapeutic window of 65-78 % D(2) receptor blockade within which most antipsychotics achieve optimal clinical efficacy with minimal side effects. Some antipsychotics though do not conform to that therapeutic window, notably clozapine. The reasons for its unexcelled clinical efficacy despite subthreshold levels of D(2) blockade are unclear and current theories on clozapine's mechanisms of action are discussed, including transiency of its D(2) receptor blocking effects or preferential blockade of limbic D(2) receptors. Evidence is also highlighted to consider the use of extended antipsychotic dosing to achieve transiency of D(2) blockade as a way to optimize functional outcomes in patients. We also present some critical clinical considerations regarding the mechanisms linking dopamine disturbance to the expression of psychosis and its blockade to the progressive resolution of psychosis, keeping in perspective the speed and onset of antipsychotic action. Finally, we discuss potential novel therapeutic strategies for schizophrenia.

The effect of risperidone on D-amino acid oxidase activity as a hypothesis for a novel mechanism of action in the treatment of schizophrenia

D-Amino acid oxidase (DAO) has been established to be involved in the oxidation of D-serine, an allosteric activator of the N-methyl-D-aspartate-type glutamate receptor in the brain, and to be associated with the onset of schizophrenia. The effect of risperidone, a benzisoxazole derivative, atypical antischizophrenic drug, on the activity of human DAO was tested using an in-vitro oxygraph system and rat C6, stable C6 transformant cells overexpressing mouse DAO (designated as C6/DAO) and pig kidney epithelial cells (LLC-PK(1)). Risperidone has a hyperbolic mixed-type inhibition, designated as 'partial uncompetitive inhibition effect', with K(i) value of 41 microM on human DAO. Risperidone exhibited a protective effect from D-amino acid induced cell death in both C6/DAO and LLC-PK(1) cells with 10% increase in viability. These data indicate the involvement of DAO activity in D-serine metabolism and also suggest a new mechanism of action to risperidone as antischizophrenic drug.

Switching stable patients with schizophrenia from depot and oral antipsychotics to long-acting injectable risperidone: efficacy, quality of life and functional outcome

OBJECTIVE

This international, non-randomised study evaluated maintained efficacy and safety of Risperidone Long-Acting Injectable (RLAI) compared to previous medications. To investigate the possible effect of differences in national health care systems across Europe, the UK subset efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and functioning data are reported here.

METHODS

Patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, symptomatically stable on antipsychotic medication, received intramuscular injections of RLAI 25 mg (to a maximum of 50 mg) every 2 weeks for 6 months.

RESULTS

Of 182 UK patients recruited; 79% had schizophrenia (87% paranoid), 21% other psychotic disorders; 96% had been hospitalised at sometime. Improvement in mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score was significant at 1 month through to endpoint (p = 0.0001). There were significant improvements in PANSS subscales (p <or= 0.001), PANSS-Marder subscores (p <or= 0.0391), and in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (p = 0.0001) at endpoint. Patients reported improvements in: HRQoL (p < 0.05), Global Assessment of Functioning (p = 0.0001) and patient satisfaction (p = 0.0001) at endpoint. The proportion of patients rating RLAI treatment as 'very good' increased from 10% to 40%. 55% (22/40) of patients hospitalised at baseline were discharged by endpoint.

CONCLUSION

Sustained, significant improvement in symptom control, HRQoL and functioning was seen in stable patients treated with RLAI over 6 months following a switch from previous antipsychotic medications.

Switching stable patients with schizophrenia from depot and oral antipsychotics to long-acting injectable risperidone: reasons for switching and safety

OBJECTIVE

An international, non-randomised study evaluated efficacy and safety of risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI) compared to previous treatment. To investigate generizability of the European data set to the UK subset safety and switching data are reported here.

METHODS

Patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder, symptomatically stable on antipsychotic medication, received intramuscular injections of RLAI 25 mg (to a maximum of 50 mg) every 2 weeks for 6 months.

RESULTS

Of 182 UK patients enrolled, 79% had schizophrenia, 21% other psychotic disorders. Insufficient efficacy (43%), side effects (45%), and non-compliance (25%) were the most common reasons for switching. Sixty-nine per cent of patients completed the trial; 8% discontinued due to adverse events (AEs). Most frequent treatment-emergent AEs were headache (8.2%), relapse (7.7%) and insomnia (7.1%); 8 (4.4%) patients reported injection-related AEs. There were significant improvements in extrapyramidal symptom rating scale total and subscale (particularly Parkinsonism) scores, regardless of previous medication (total cohort, p < or = 0.0001). There was a small but significant increase in body weight at endpoint (1.2 kg, p = 0.0023). One patient suffered a myocardial infarction and died (not treatment-related). There were no substantial differences between the full data set and the UK sub-population

CONCLUSION

Switch to RLAI was well-tolerated in stable patients over 6 months. The European data set is generalizable to the UK patient population.

Long-term effects of risperidone versus haloperidol on verbal memory, attention, and symptomatology in schizophrenia

There is evidence in the literature that cognitive functions in schizophrenia (SC) may be improved by atypical neuroleptics (NLPs) in contrast to typical medication, but there is still controversy regarding this apparent superiority of atypical drugs. In this study, we assessed the differential effects of risperidone and haloperidol on verbal memory, attention, and psychiatric symptoms in SC. The performance of 28 SC participants, randomly assigned to risperidone (2-6 mg/day) or haloperidol (2-40 mg/day), was compared with that of healthy controls. The California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), the d2 Cancellation Test, and the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale were administered at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. Relative to controls, all SC participants showed markedly impaired verbal memory and processing speed at each assessment period. There was no differential effect between the two NLPs on CVLT and d2 performance. However, risperidone was more effective than haloperidol in reducing psychiatric symptoms. Improvement in symptom severity was not associated with improvement in neurocognitive performance on these specific tests. Neither conventional nor atypical neuroleptic medications improved neurocognitive functioning over a 12-month follow-up, suggesting that psychopathological improvement under risperidone is independent of cognitive function.

Five-year follow-up during antipsychotic treatment: efficacy, safety, functional and social outcome

OBJECTIVE

Explore the long-term course of schizophrenia and related disorders.

METHOD

Naturalistic study of 225 patients initially treated with risperidone (monotherapy or in combination with other psychotropic drugs) over 5 years.

RESULTS

Stable symptomatology and side effects were observed. Clinician GAF scores were 55-61, but patients' self-ratings were higher. Clinician and patient CGI scores were at the same level. Annual in-patient days decreased but days in sheltered accommodations increased still more. Only 12% of the patients studied or worked full-time. One in four had no social contacts except with staff. Eight patients died during the 5 years.

CONCLUSION

The findings underline the chronicity and seriousness of psychotic disorders in terms of social outcome and, indirectly, the low quality of life of this group of persons. Patients were generally well aware of their illness and able to sort out symptoms from drug side effects. This opens for more active involvement of patients in monitoring their own treatment.

Effects of risperidone and quetiapine on cognition in patients with schizophrenia and predominantly negative symptoms

Evidence suggests that neurocognitive impairment is a key factor in the pathology of schizophrenia and is linked with the negative symptoms of the disease. In this study the effects of the atypical antipsychotics quetiapine and risperidone on cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia and with predominantly negative symptoms were compared. Patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with quetiapine or risperidone for 12 weeks. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline, Week 6 and Week 12. Efficacy was assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) at baseline, Week 6 and Week 12. Extrapyramidal side-effects were assessed each week using the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS), adverse events were recorded as additional indicators of tolerability throughout the trial. In total, 44 patients were enrolled in the study. Data from the 34 patients who completed cognitive assessments at two or more time points out of three (baseline, Week 6 and Week 12) are analysed here. Quetiapine improved significantly global cognitive index z-scores at both Week 6 (p<0.001 vs. baseline) and Week 12 (p<0.01 vs. baseline), whereas risperidone improved significantly global cognitive index z-scores at Week 12 (p<0.05). Between-group comparisons at Week 6 showed significantly greater improvements in working memory and verbal memory with quetiapine than risperidone (p<0.05) and a significantly greater improvement in reaction quality/attention with quetiapine than risperidone at Week 12 (p<0.05). Quetiapine and risperidone produced significant improvements from baseline in PANSS total (p<0.001) and subscale scores at Week 12. Significant improvements in SANS total score were also seen in both the quetiapine (p<0.001) and risperidone (p<0.01) groups at Week 12 compared with baseline. SAS scores, measuring the incidence of extrapyramidal side-effects, were higher in patients receiving risperidone compared with those receiving quetiapine, and significant differences were seen at Weeks 3, 4, 5 and 7. Both quetiapine and risperidone improved cognition according to changes in cognitive index scores from baseline to Week 12. These results suggest that quetiapine and risperidone provide valuable treatment options for patients with schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms. Also, the improvements in cognition following treatment with quetiapine and risperidone may enhance long-term outcomes for these patients.

Efficacy of flupentixol and risperidone in chronic schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms

The study investigated the non-inferiority of flupentixol compared to risperidone in the treatment of negative symptoms. In addition, the effects of flupentixol on mood and cognitive symptoms were explored. In a randomized, double-blind multicenter study, 144 non-acute schizophrenia patients with predominant negative symptoms were treated with a flexible dose of either flupentixol (4-12 mg/d) or risperidone (2-6 mg/d) for up to 25 weeks. In addition to a non-inferiority analysis, a principal component analysis (PCA) of the PANSS was performed post hoc. Regarding negative symptoms, flupentixol proved to be non-inferior to risperidone. Both drugs improved depressed mood with effect sizes favoring flupentixol. PCA suggested a five-factor structure. Effect sizes for the cognitive factor were up to 0.74 for flupentixol and up to 0.80 for risperidone. EPS scores were rather low and Parkinsonism improved in both groups, but anticholinergic drugs were prescribed significantly more frequently in the flupentixol group, which generally showed significantly more adverse events. Results indicate that the 1st generation antipsychotic flupentixol improves negative, affective and cognitive symptoms in chronic schizophrenia comparable to risperidone. Further studies should confirm the latter using neuropsychological performance tests and should investigate whether tolerability improves with a markedly lower dose range.

Treatment of psychosis: 30 years of progress

Thirty years ago, psychiatrists had only a few choices of old neuroleptics available to them, currently defined as conventional or typical antipsychotics, as a result schizophrenics had to suffer the severe extra pyramidal side effects. Nowadays, new treatments are more ambitious, aiming not only to improve psychotic symptoms, but also quality of life and social reinsertion. Our objective is to briefly but critically review the advances in the treatment of schizophrenia with antipsychotics in the past 30 years. We conclude that conventional antipsychotics still have a place when just the cost of treatment, a key factor in poor regions, is considered. The atypical antipsychotic drugs are a class of agents that have become the most widely used to treat a variety of psychoses because of their superiority with regard to extra pyramidal symptoms. We can envisage different therapeutic strategies in the future, each uniquely targeting a different dimension of schizophrenia, be it positive, negative, cognitive or affective symptoms.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, part 2: long-term treatment of schizophrenia

These guidelines for the biological treatment of schizophrenia were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). The goal during the development of these guidelines was to review systematically all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of schizophrenia, and to reach a consensus on a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating people with schizophrenia. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for schizophrenia, as well as from meta-analyses, reviews and randomised clinical trials on the efficacy of pharmacological and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). This second part of the guidelines covers the long-term treatment as well as the management of relevant side effects. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antipsychotic medication, other pharmacological treatment options, electroconvulsive therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of adults suffering from schizophrenia.

Risperidone-induced symptomatic hyperprolactinaemia in adolescents

Studies performed in adult patients unambiguously demonstrate a marked effect of risperidone on prolactin blood levels, with possible clinical effects related to hyperprolactinemia, such as gynecomastia and galactorrhea. However, the largest study performed in children and adolescents showed a weak effect of risperidone on prolactin concentrations during short-term treatment and a negligible effect during long-term treatment, which was probably because of the relatively low dosages of risperidone used [approximately 0.04 mg/(kg x d)]. Among the 10 psychotic adolescents treated with risperidone in our unit, we had 3 cases of gynecomastia in 3 male patients and 2 cases of galactorrhea in 2 female patients. The prolactin blood levels in these cases and in 3 other patients without apparent prolactin-related side effects were all above the normal range (median, 59 ng/mL; range, 30-123 ng/mL). Thus, risperidone administered to adolescents at doses commonly used for the treatment of psychotic symptoms can strongly increase prolactin levels, with clinical consequences such as gynecomastia and/or galactorrhea. Given that the long-term effects of antipsychotic drug-induced hyperprolactinemia are not well documented, especially regarding osteopenia, infertility, growth, and pubertal delay, risperidone should be administered with caution to children and adolescents.

A double-blind, controlled study of sertindole versus risperidone in the treatment of moderate-to-severe schizophrenia

Sertindole is a non-sedating atypical antipsychotic effective in the management of schizophrenia and is associated with placebo-level incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, flexible-dose, multi-centre study, the efficacy and tolerability of sertindole was directly compared with another atypical antipsychotic in patients with schizophrenia. A total of 187 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with sertindole (12-24 mg/day, n=98) or risperidone (4-10 mg/day, n=89) for 12 weeks. Although early termination reduced the power of the study, some significant between-group differences were evident. Sertindole reduced the mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores to a greater extent than risperidone, and the difference reached statistical significance at endpoint for the Observed Cases (OC) dataset. Moreover, sertindole was superior for the treatment of negative symptoms compared to risperidone (P<0.05, Last Observation Carried Forward and OC). Both treatment groups were similarly effective in improving Clinical Global Impression (Severity and Improvement), the Drug Attitude Inventory and Global Assessment of Functioning scores. Sertindole and risperidone were both well tolerated. Numerically, fewer patients in the sertindole group (19%) reported EPS-related adverse events than in the risperidone group (28%), although significantly more sertindole-treated patients reported QT prolongation and abnormal ejaculation volume (P<0.05). In conclusion, sertindole was well tolerated and demonstrated clinically relevant efficacy advantages over risperidone.

The effect of neuroleptic treatments on executive function and symptomatology in schizophrenia: a 1-year follow up study

Cognitive dysfunctions (as in memory, attention and executive function) have been recognized as fundamental features of schizophrenia. Executive dysfunction is a major obstacle to functional outcome, community functioning and rehabilitation success and it is crucial to assess the effects of so-called neuroleptic (NLP) medications in this domain of cognitive functioning. Risperidone, an atypical NLP, has been reported to improve executive function in schizophrenia (SZ), but there is controversy regarding these findings. The aim of the current study was to assess the differential effects of risperidone (2-6 mg) and conventional (2-40 mg haloperidol) NLPs on executive skills in 31 individuals with SZ over a 12-month period. The performance of both NLP groups was compared to the performance of 17 age- and education-matched healthy controls. In this randomized, double blind study, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) was administered at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after initiating medication. The relationship between executive functioning and the course of clinical symptoms, as assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was also investigated. Results showed that, relative to healthy controls, individuals with SZ showed marked impairment in WCST from baseline through 12 months of treatment. Also, participants under haloperidol or risperidone NLP medication performed similarly on the WCST at all assessment periods showing that risperidone and haloperidol do not differ in their effect on executive functioning. Risperidone treatment, however, was more effective in the reduction of negative symptoms. The differential efficacy of risperidone over negative symptoms and WCST performance strongly suggests that the executive impairments are to some extent the result of brain abnormalities independent of those that produce the major psychopathology manifestations seen in SZ.

Risperidone plasma levels, clinical response and side-effects

INTRODUCTION

Assessment of the relation between oral risperidone dose, serum drug levels and clinical response may provide important information for rational treatment decisions. Inter-individual differences in the liver cytochrome P450 system, especially in the CYP2D6 subsystem, which account for a significant portion of risperidone metabolism, may also influence plasma drug levels and alter clinical response parameters. We thus prospectively investigated risperidone serum concentrations in relation to clinical efficacy and side-effects and genotyped major CYP2D6 polymorphisms to determine their effect upon these parameters.

METHODS

Neuroleptic monotherapy with risperidone was administered to schizophrenia patients in a 6-week open dose clinical trial. Weekly assessments including CGI and PANSS ratings to assess psychopathology; SAS to assess medication side effects; and blood draws to quantify steady state plasma levels of risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone were carried out. In addition, major CYP2D6 polymorphisms including alleles *4, *6 and *14 were genotyped.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were recruited. Mean oral dose of risperidone was 4.3 +/- 0.9 mg. Mean plasma level of both risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone together ("active moiety") was 41.6 +/- 26.6 ng/ml. Significant improvements in PANSS scales and the various subscales ensued. There was a positive linear correlation between active moiety plasma levels and dose (r = 0.291, p = 0.015) and between risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone levels (r = 0.262; p = 0.016). Nonresponders to pharmacotherapy (PANSS-Improvement < 30%) showed significantly higher active moiety plasma levels (49.9 +/- 30.7 ng/ml) than responders (38.2 +/- 17.0 ng/ml; p = 0.045) without significantly higher oral doses (p = 0.601). Patients with longer illness duration (> or = 3 years) had significantly higher plasma drug levels than those with a shorter course (< 3 years; p = 0.039). Extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) and plasma levels were not correlated (r = 0.028; p = 0.843), but higher plasma levels at week 2 predicted an incidence for EPS (p < 0.050). Accordingly, patients initially receiving higher oral doses of risperidone were significantly more likely to respond with EPS in the trial course. Eight patients (9.8%) were heterozygous carriers of the CYP2D6 allele *4. CYP2D6 polymorphisms did not predict clinical response, but predicted a tendential increase in the plasma risperidone to 9-OH-risperidone ratio (0.5 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.9 +/- 1.8; p = 0.120).

DISCUSSION

The major finding was that responders to risperidone treatment had significantly lower blood levels of risperidone and 9-OH risperidone than patients who did not respond to the treatment despite administration of similar oral doses. The observed CYP2D6 polymorphisms did not contribute to altered clinical efficacy, but affected risperidone to 9-OH-risperidone ratios. Increased plasma levels of the active moiety in patients with longer illness may represent general aging effects. Conversely, the observed higher plasma levels in nonresponders may derive from unaccounted genetic metabolism abnormalities or Phase II metabolism disturbances. Patients initially receiving higher oral risperidone doses were more likely to respond with extrapyramidal side effects which reaffirms the need for careful titration. The high inter-individual variability in risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone metabolization and the relationship between clinical outcome and plasma levels warrants regular plasma level monitoring of both compounds to assess for the clinically relevant active moiety.

Health care costs for schizophrenia patients started on olanzapine versus risperidone

PURPOSE

The change in direct medical costs for schizophrenia patients who were started on olanzapine or risperidone and who were privately insured was studied.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 1996-1999 data from the databases representing the health care experiences of individuals employed by large organizations and their dependents was performed. The sample included all individuals with a drug claim for olanzapine or risperidone, a claim with a schizophrenia diagnosis within 90 days of the drug claim, no claim for the same drug in the prior six months, and continuous health-plan enrollment for 12 months before and after the prescription.

RESULTS

The sample included 162 patients initiated on olanzapine and 119 patients initiated on risperidone. Demographic and clinical profiles were not significantly different between groups. Annual schizophrenia-related prescription and outpatient costs increased following initiation on olanzapine or risperidone compared with the pre-initiation period. This was partially offset by a decrease in inpatient expenditures. Olanzapine initiators had higher outpatient drug expenditures than risperidone initiators in the 12 months following initiation (adjusted means, $2105 versus $1934) (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups in total schizophrenia-related payments ($5251 versus $4950).

CONCLUSION

The total health care expenditure related to treating schizophrenia was similar between privately insured patients who were initiated on olanzapine and patients who were started on risperidone.

Risperidone (Risperdal): clinical experience with a new antipsychosis drug

Risperidone (Risperdal) is a benzisoxazole derivative with a high affinity for serotonin 5-HT2 and dopamine D2 receptors, and some affinity for alpha- adrenergic, histamine H1 and dopamine D1 receptors. It has no anticholinergic effects. Early studies demonstrated risperidone to be an effective medication for psychotic symptoms, probably more so than the older neuroleptics for both positive and negative symptoms. At clinically effective doses, risperidone causes no more extrapyramidal side-effects (EPS) than placebo; at higher doses EPS frequency increases in a dose-dependent manner. Since it became available in 1994, extensive experience with the drug supports favourable early impressions of efficacy and tolerability. Minimal sedation, relatively little weight gain and absence of anticholinergic manifestations contribute to the relative tolerability of risperidone as compared to older neuroleptics. However, risperidone is associated with hyperprolactinaemia which can result in amenorrhoea and sexual dysfunction. Compared to older neuroleptics, pharmacoeconomic studies have shown that use of risperidone is associated with reduced hospitalisation and direct cost savings. A recent study found equivalent efficacy between risperidone and clozapine for treatment-resistant patients. Two studies comparing risperidone and olanzapine have yielded positive but conflicting findings. The overall positive experience with risperidone has resulted in the drug being widely recommended as a first line treatment option for psychoses.

Healthcare resource utilization during 1-year treatment with long-acting, injectable risperidone

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is associated with disproportionately high costs, mainly due to hospitalization rates. This study assessed healthcare resource use in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder during treatment with long-acting risperidone.

METHODS

Patients (n = 397 [inpatients, 24%; outpatients, 76%]) receiving stable doses of an antipsychotic for >or=4 weeks were eligible to enter this 1-year, open-label study. Following a 2-week run-in period (oral risperidone 1-6 mg/day), patients received intramuscular long-acting risperidone (25 or 50 mg modal dose) every 2 weeks. Healthcare resource use in the previous 12 weeks was assessed at baseline and 12-weekly intervals.

RESULTS

Patients needing hospitalization decreased significantly and continuously from 38% during the 12 weeks before study entry to 12% during the last 12 weeks. Mean hospitalization length during the study was 30.5 days (outpatients, 4.9 days; inpatients, 110 days). This included 28 patients (7%) who remained in hospital throughout the study. During treatment, 71% of those hospitalized at baseline were discharged. Partial hospitalization decreased significantly from 7% of patients during the 12 weeks before treatment to 3% during the last 12 weeks. Outpatient consultations also decreased significantly from 70% of patients to 30% in the first 12 weeks of treatment and remained stable thereafter. Only 9% of patients required an emergency room visit; mostly for non-psychiatric conditions.

CONCLUSION

Healthcare resource use is significantly reduced in patients with stable schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder receiving long-acting risperidone. It is highly likely that these reductions will decrease healthcare costs in patients receiving long-acting risperidone.

Can patients at risk for persistent negative symptoms be identified during their first episode of psychosis?

Patients with schizophrenia who show persistent negative symptoms are an important subgroup, but they are difficult to identify early in the course of illness. The objective of this study was to examine characteristics that discriminate between first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients in whom primary negative symptoms did or did not persist after 1 year of treatment. Patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of FEP whose primary negative symptoms did (N = 36) or did not (N = 35) persist at 1 year were contrasted on their baseline and 1-year characteristics. Results showed that patients with persistent primary negative symptoms (N = 36) had a significantly longer duration of untreated psychosis (p < .005), worse premorbid adjustment during early (p < .001) and late adolescence (p < .01), and a higher level of affective flattening (p < .01) at initial presentation compared with patients with transitory primary negative symptoms. The former group also showed significantly lower remission rates at 1 year (p < .001). Multiple regression analysis confirmed the independent contribution of duration of untreated psychosis, premorbid adjustment, and affective flattening at baseline to the patients' likelihood of developing persistent negative symptoms. It may therefore be possible to distinguish a subgroup of FEP patients whose primary negative symptoms are likely to persist on the basis of characteristics shown at initial presentation for treatment.

Adverse effects of risperidone and haloperidol treatment in schizophrenia

PURPOSE

Side effects of pharmacological treatment in schizophrenia continue to be a major issue in spite of the development of new antipsychotics. The aim of this study is to explore the adverse effects of conventional and atypical antipsychotic drugs and their associated factors.

METHODS

Over 3 months, 41 patients with schizophrenia were randomized to treatment with risperidone 1-12 mg (n=21) or haloperidol 2-20 mg (n=20) daily. Efficacy was assessed by improvement of psychotic symptoms, measured on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The safety and tolerability were assessed with the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale, the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale and clinical laboratory assessments.

RESULTS

Each treatment reduced psychotic symptoms. PANSS total scores, positive scores, and general psychopathology scores declined as trial went on without significant differences between the two groups. While PANSS negative scores improved better in the risperidone group than in the haloperidol group. The tolerability of antipsychotics was statistical significantly better in the risperidone than in the haloperidol-treated patients. The most frequent adverse effects for both groups were tremor and rigidity. Antipsychotics, their doses, and hyperprolactinemia predict short-term extrapyramidal side effects. Serum prolactin levels could predict parkinsonism and dyskinesia severity. However, dyskinesia was best predicted by the doses of neuroleptics. The predictive factor of dystonia was the antipsychotic drug itself. After adjusting drug doses and concomitant medications, side effects could be markedly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that risperidone was superior to haloperidol in improving negative symptoms and better tolerated during the 12 weeks' treatment of schizophrenia. Serum prolactin levels could predict the severity of parkinsonism and dyskinesia.

Clinical potential of omega-3 fatty acids in the treatment of schizophrenia

The phospholipids in the neuronal membranes of the brain are rich in highly unsaturated essential fatty acids (EFAs). It has been hypothesised that abnormalities of phospholipid metabolism are present in patients with schizophrenia and that the EFAs omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in particular, may have a role in treating this illness. Considerable preclinical and clinical evidence provides support for this proposal. An epidemiological study reported a better outcome for patients with schizophrenia in countries where the diet is rich in unsaturated fatty acids. Evidence of abnormalities of EFAs has been found in erythrocyte membranes and cultured skin fibroblasts of patients with schizophrenia, and abnormal retinal function and niacin skin flush tests (markers of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid depletion) have also been reported. Case reports and an open-label clinical trial reported efficacy for EPA in schizophrenia. Four randomised, controlled trials of EPA versus placebo as supplemental medication have now been reported. Two of these trials showed significant benefit with EPA on the positive and negative symptom scale total scores, whereas the other two did not show any effects on this primary efficacy measure. One study also reported a beneficial effect on dyskinesia. In the only published trial in which EPA was used as monotherapy versus placebo in schizophrenia, some evidence was found to suggest antipsychotic activity. Taken together, there is considerable evidence to suggest abnormalities of EFAs in cell membranes of patients with schizophrenia, and there is preliminary evidence that EPA is an effective adjunct to antipsychotics.

Risperidone in acute and long-term therapy of schizophrenia--a clinical profile

Data from a range of well-controlled clinical trials, observational studies, and clinical use support the efficacy of risperidone for both acute and long-term therapy of schizophrenic psychoses. With regard to positive symptoms, the efficacy of risperidone was shown to be at least comparable with that of haloperidol. However, risperidone differs from conventional antipsychotics because it is more effective against the negative symptoms, has beneficial effects on affective and cognitive symptoms, and carries less risk of extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). To date, risperidone is the only atypical antipsychotic to have shown a significantly lower relapse rate compared with haloperidol in a long-term double-blind trial. This review describes comprehensive trial data and therapeutic observations gained with risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia since its approval.

Long-term assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of risperidone in early schizophrenia: An international multicenter study

OBJECTIVE The aim of this open multicenter international study was an assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of risperidone administered for 12 months in patients with early schizophrenia. METHODS Two hundred and five patients, 113 male and 92 female, aged 15-46 years were included. The mean daily risperidone dose was 3.3±1.4 mg/day and in three-quarters of patients the dose was in the range of 2-4 mg. For psychometric assessment the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were used. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-two patients (64%) completed the study. Significant improvement (at least 20% reduction) was found on PANSS subscales for positive symptoms (89% of patients), negative symptoms (77% of patients), as well as for depressive symptoms measured by MADRS (78% of patients). Parkinsonian symptoms occurred in 53 patients (26.5%), necessitating the use of anticholinergic drugs. Risperidone treatment did not exert a significant effect on vital signs and on ECG recordings. CONCLUSION The results suggest that, in a substantial proportion of patients with early schizophrenia, risperidone can be successfully used for initiation of pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia and then be continued on the long-term basis.

Management of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia: new treatment options

This article presents a systematic review of pharmacological treatment for negative symptoms of schizophrenia, based on MEDLINE searches from 1995 to September 2002 to identify pertinent clinical trials. The pharmacotherapy of negative symptoms in schizophrenia includes novel/atypical antipsychotics and classical antipsychotics, as well as antidepressants, glutamatergic compounds, antiepileptic drugs and estrogens. In the assessment of therapy for negative symptoms of schizophrenia, it is imperative that better studies of sound methodology are performed. In such studies, some important aspects to be considered include an accurate definition and assessment of negative symptoms (including well designed, valid and reliable rating scales), the differentiation between primary and secondary negative symptoms, an appropriate selection of standard comparators, adequate dosages of comparators (e.g. haloperidol dosages) and an overall optimal study design. Most of the available studies on treating negative symptoms in schizophrenia have focused on the atypical antipsychotics, while other potential candidates, mostly in the context of add-on therapy, have not been so intensively investigated. Atypical antipsychotics have been proven in placebo-controlled trials to be effective in treating negative symptoms of acute schizophrenic episodes. In many of the comparator studies, they showed efficacy in treating negative symptoms that was superior to that of typical antipsychotics. Data on stable, predominant negative symptoms in subchronic or chronic cases of schizophrenia, although limited, have demonstrated the efficacy of atypical antipsychotics. If the beneficial tolerability profile with respect to extrapyramidal symptoms is also taken into account during clinical decision making, the atypical antipsychotics should be preferred for the treatment of negative symptoms. It is also worth noting that the traditional antipsychotics have the risk of inducing negative symptoms in the context of akinesia. The benefits of add-on therapy with SSRIs or a glutamatergic compound are well documented. Estrogen add-on therapy seems promising. Other traditionally suggested approaches, such as comedication with an antiepileptic drug, lithium or beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, cannot generally be recommended on the basis of the available data.

Intramuscular preparations of antipsychotics: uses and relevance in clinical practice

Intramuscular formulations of antipsychotics can be sub-divided into two groups on the basis of their pharmacokinetic features: short-acting preparations and long-acting or depot preparations. Short-acting intramuscular formulations are used to manage acute psychotic episodes. On the other hand, long-acting compounds, also called "depot", are administered as antipsychotic maintenance treatment to ensure compliance and to eliminate bioavailability problems related to absorption and first pass metabolism. Adverse effects of antipsychotics have been studied with particular respect to oral versus short- and long-acting intramuscular formulations of the different compounds. For short-term intramuscular preparations the main risk with classical compounds are hypotension and extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). Data on the incidence of EPS with depot formulations are controversial: some studies point out that the incidence of EPS is significantly higher in patients receiving depot preparations, whereas others show no difference between oral and depot antipsychotics. Studies on the strategies for switching patients from oral to depot treatment suggest that this procedure is reasonably well tolerated, so that in clinical practice depot antipsychotic therapy is usually begun while the oral treatment is still being administered, with gradual tapering of the oral dose. Efficacy, pharmacodynamics and clinical pharmacokinetics of haloperidol decanoate, fluphenazine enanthate and decanoate, clopenthixol decanoate, zuclopenthixol decanoate and acutard, flupenthixol decanoate, perphenazine enanthate, pipothiazine palmitate and undecylenate, and fluspirilene are reviewed. In addition, the intramuscular preparations of atypical antipsychotics and clinical uses are reviewed. Olanzapine and ziprasidone are available only as short-acting preparations, while risperidone is to date the only novel antipsychotic available as depot formulation. To date, acutely ill, agitated psychotic patients have been treated with high parenteral doses of typical antipsychotics, which often cause serious EPS, especially dystonic reactions. Intramuscular formulations of novel antipsychotics (olanzapine and ziprasidone), which appear to have a better tolerability profile than typical compounds, showed an equivalent efficacy to parenteral typical agents in the acute treatment of psychoses. However, parenteral or depot formulations of atypical antipsychotics are not yet widely available.

The new and evolving pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia

Based on the evidence presented here, the following tentative conclusions can be drawn. Atypical antipsychotics (except amisulpride) have shown superiority over placebo in acute schizophrenia. Compared with conventional antipsychotics, they are at least as effective. Generally, analyses employing conservative criteria (e.g., Cochrane reviews) report few efficacy differences between atypical and conventional agents. There are now many well-controlled studies indicating modest advantages for the atypical antipsychotics, however, particularly in specific symptom domains. For the treatment of negative symptoms, olanzapine and to a lesser extent amisulpride seem most promising. Risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine display advantages in improving cognitive and depressive symptoms. There are indications that the atypical antipsychotics are associated with decreased likelihood of rehospitalization and improved quality of life. In head-to-head comparisons of atypical antipsychotics, none have shown consistent efficacy advantages. In severely refractory samples, no atypical antipsychotics have consistently been shown to be as effective as clozapine or superior to conventional agents. There are indications, however, that risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine have advantages over conventional agents in less severely refractory patients. Few maintenance RCTs have been published, and efficacy advantages for atypical antipsychotics in prospective RCTs in first-episode schizophrenia have not been reported.

Does risperidone act better in schizophrenic patients who have a family or obstetric history?

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of treatment with risperidone on psychopathological symptoms and cognitive deficits in schizophrenic patients, in relation to family history, obstetric complications and duration of the illness.

METHODS

Fifty schizophrenic inpatients (29 males, 21 females), aged 16-50 (mean 28 years), with duration of the illness 1-15 (mean 4 years) who successfully completed a 3-month risperidone treatment were included into the study. Family history of psychiatric illness and the presence of obstetric complications were estimated by a semistructured questionnaire. Schizophrenic symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS). Cognitive abilities were measured by neuropsychological "frontal lobe" tests: Trail Making Test (TMT), part B, Stroop Color Word Interference Test, part B, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). The clinical and neuropsychological evaluation was performed before and after 3 months of risperidone treatment, in doses 2-6 mg (mean 4.2 mg/day).

RESULTS

Before treatment, patients with family history had significantly higher intensity of negative symptoms, and obtained worse results on WCST perseverative errors (PE) and correct categories (CC). These measures were also impaired in subjects with obstetric complications. Additionally, in patients with obstetric complications, total and general PANSS psychopathology was higher and the results of Stroop B were worse. After a 3-month treatment with risperidone, no difference between respective groups was observed both in psychopathology and in neuropsychological tests. Patients with obstetric complications had higher degree of improvement on positive and negative symptoms and on TMT-B than the remaining ones. Patients with longer duration of the illness had less improvement on positive symptoms with risperidone treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that treatment with risperidone results in better compensation of psychopathological (negative symptoms) and neuropsychological (working memory) deficits in patients who have a family history and/or obstetric complications. This may be due to a favourable effect of risperidone on the prefrontal cortex dysfunction mediating these deficits.

Effects of risperidone on conduct and disruptive behavior disorders in children with subaverage IQs

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether risperidone is effective in reducing symptoms of disruptive behaviors (such as aggression, impulsivity, defiance of authority figures, and property destruction) associated with conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and disruptive behavior disorder-not otherwise specified in children with subaverage IQs.

METHOD

The trial consisted of a 1-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period and was followed by a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled period. One hundred ten children (aged 5-12 years inclusive) with an IQ of 36-84 with a disruptive behavior disorder and a score of at least 24 on the Conduct Problem subscale of the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form (NCBRF) were enrolled. Eighty percent of subjects had comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Risperidone doses ranged from 0.02 to 0.06 mg/kg per day. Subjects were rated on the NCBRF, Aberrant Behavior Checklist, Behavior Problems Inventory, Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), modified California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), and a continuous performance task (CPT).

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat analysis of risperidone-treated subjects showed a significant (p < .001) reduction in mean scores (from 33.4 at baseline to 17.6 at end point; 47.3% reduction) versus placebo-treated subjects (mean baseline of 32.6 to 25.8 at end point; 20.9% reduction) on the Conduct Problem subscale of the NCBRF. Between-group differences in favor of risperidone were seen as early as week 1 and were significant at all post-baseline visits. Other subscales showed significant improvement with risperidone compared with placebo. CGI scale ratings of improvement showed highly significant gains for risperidone over placebo. A subanalysis demonstrated that the effect of risperidone was unaffected by diagnosis, presence/absence of ADHD, psychostimulant use, IQ status, and somnolence. Risperidone produced no changes on the cognitive variables (CPT/modified CVLT). The most common side effects included somnolence, headache, appetite increase, and dyspepsia. Side effects related to extrapyramidal symptoms were reported in 7 (13.2%) and 3 (5.3%) of the subjects in the risperidone and placebo groups, respectively (p = .245).

CONCLUSIONS

Risperidone appears to be an adequately tolerated and effective treatment in children with subaverage IQs and severe disruptive behaviors such as aggression and destructive behavior.

Fluvoxamine augmentation in risperidone-resistant schizophrenia: an open trial

We investigated the efficacy and safety of augmenting risperidone with fluvoxamine for the treatment of residual positive and negative symptoms in patients with chronic schizophrenia who had shown an incomplete response to risperidone. A total of 30 patients completed the open trial over a 12-week period during which fluvoxamine was added to risperidone. The result from the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) and Simpson-Angus extrapyramidal effects (S-A) scale were examined at baseline, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment. There were no significant differences in PANSS positive, negative and general psychopathology scores, or in S-A scale scores at any point during the treatment. These results suggest that fluvoxamine appears to be ineffective in augmenting the risperidone treatment response in chronic schizophrenic patients. Further controlled trials will be needed to confirm this observation.

Switching antipsychotic medications: general recommendations and switching to amisulpride

As more and more novel antipsychotic agents are introduced, the need for practical guidelines on switching these medications is becoming increasingly important. Indications for a switch include situations where the patient or his family/caregiver requests a change in medication, where the patient cannot tolerate current treatment, where they have comorbid physical or psychiatric conditions or where they have achieved only a partial remission, are refractory to treatment or have relapsed. Cross-tapering is generally the most acceptable method of switching, although abrupt withdrawal may be necessary in some cases, such as when a patient develops a severe or acute reaction to their current treatment. Possible problems of switching include the risk of discontinuation reactions and the re-emergence of psychotic symptoms. The pharmacological profile of amisulpride means it has a relatively low potential for interactions with other drugs and may be started while discontinuing the previous antipsychotic. It should be started at the target dose for the patient's current symptoms. A retrospective questionnaire among 60 patients switching to amisulpride treatment was undertaken to identify the characteristics of patients switching antipsychotics and their reasons. Patients were switched from a variety of antipsychotic medications, both traditional (42% of patients) and atypical (58%). Most patients (87%) had at least two reasons for changing medication, with lack of efficacy, adverse events and treatment optimisation before reintegration being the most common. Contrary to recommendations, 89% of patients were switched abruptly between medications. A total of 62% of patients received amisulpride doses in the range 400-800 mg/day and most (72%) required no dose adjustment. The great majority of patients (87%) switched to amisulpride without problems.

The efficacy and safety of risperidone for the treatment of geriatric psychosis

Risperidone is an atypical antipsychotic drug which has been suggested to be beneficial for the treatment of elderly patients with psychotic symptoms. In this study, we assessed the short-term efficacy and the safety of risperidone in geropsychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms. The sample population included 110 elderly inpatients with psychotic disorders. Assessment for drug efficacy using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Sandoz Clinical Assessment-Geriatric scale, and Clinical Global Impression scale was conducted at baseline and also at 4 weeks subsequent to risperidone treatment commencement. Subsequent to commencing risperidone treatment, 80 patients completed a 4-week therapeutic evaluation. Seventy (87.5%) of the 80 patients experienced mild to substantial improvement using the Clinical Global Impression scale. Adverse effects were monitored in all 110 patients. The most commonly detected adverse effects were weakness of legs or walking problems (43/110; 39.1%) and dizziness (32/110; 29.1%). Peripheral edema was noted in 18 (16.4%) patients. Risperidone, in low doses, appeared to have been effective in this sample of patients older than 65 years with psychotic symptoms. The mean dose (2.1 +/- SD 1.4 mg/day) applied was lower then that suggested for young patients and was related to the each specific patient diagnosis. Peripheral edema and walking problems were commonly observed adverse effects for these elderly patients, such problems having not been seen to the same extent in previous studies of young patients.

Treatment of the symptoms of schizophrenia: a combined analysis of double-blind studies comparing risperidone with haloperidol and other antipsychotic agents

Combined data on efficacy were available from 12 double-blind short-term (maximum 8 weeks) trials comparing risperidone and other antipsychotics in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Patients received risperidone (n = 1056) or other antipsychotics (n = 703). Haloperidol (n = 473) was the most frequently prescribed other antipsychotic. Efficacy assessments include the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total, subscale (positive symptoms, negative symptoms and general psychopathology), cluster (cognitive and affective symptoms) and item (anxiety and hostility) scores. At endpoint, the mean decrease from baseline in PANSS total scores was significantly greater for patients receiving risperidone (-20.9) than other antipsychotics (-16.2; P < 0.001), or the subset receiving haloperidol (-14.3; P < 0.001). Risperidone-treated patients showed a significantly greater decrease in the positive (P < 0.01), negative (P < 0.05) and general psychopathology (P < 0.001) scores than patients receiving other antipsychotics or haloperidol. Scores for cognition, affective symptoms, anxiety and hostility each improved significantly (P < 0.05) more for patients receiving risperidone than those receiving other antipsychotics or haloperidol. Efficacy data on patients with an acute exacerbation were available from seven trials (risperidone n = 372, other antipsychotics n = 285, including haloperidol n = 120). At endpoint, the mean decrease from baseline in PANSS total scores was significantly greater for patients receiving risperidone (-24.7) than other antipsychotics (-19.8, P < 0.01) including haloperidol (-19.8, P < 0.05). Risperidone-treated patients also showed a greater decrease in positive symptom scores (-7.8) than those receiving other antipsychotics (-6.3; P < 0.01) or haloperidol (-7.1). A > or = 20% reduction in PANSS total score with risperidone, haloperidol and other antipsychotics was achieved by 65.9%, 54.3% and 54.9%, respectively; a > or = 30% PANSS reduction by 54.0%, 46.6% and 46.5% of patients, respectively; and a > or = 40% reduction by 43.8%, 33.7% and 34.4% of patients, respectively. These findings are consistent with earlier findings that show risperidone is more efficacious than haloperidol for reducing the symptoms of schizophrenia.

Meta-analysis comparing newer antipsychotic drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia: evaluating the indirect approach

BACKGROUND

Meta-analysis is a useful method to assess the efficacy of newer antipsychotic drugs compared with older drugs or placebo. However, few trials directly compare novel drugs to each other.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the method of indirect meta-analysis by applying it to data on olanzapine versus haloperidol and risperidone versus haloperidol to enable a comparison between olanzapine and risperidone.

METHODS

Published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of risperidone, olanzapine, and/or haloperidol were identified through literature searches (1983 to 1999) of the MEDLINE, Current Contents, and HealthSTAR databases and reviewed. Data for the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative subscale, the percentage of patients using anticholinergic drugs, and the percentage of patients dropping out due to lack of efficacy, side effects, or any cause were extracted and combined using the indirect method. These findings were compared with those from a direct comparative study of olanzapine and risperidone.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 8 RCTs comparing risperidone to haloperidol and 3 comparing olanzapine to haloperidol. Only 1 trial directly comparing olanzapine and risperidone was found. In this trial, the change in BPRS total and PANSS negative subscale scores tended to be higher with olanzapine by 1.80 and 1.10, respectively, but these differences were not statistically significant. Indirect meta-analysis yielded similar results. Changes in both BPRS total scores and PANSS negative subscale scores tended to be higher with olanzapine by 0.37 and 0.54, respectively, and again, the differences were not statistically significant. In the indirect meta-analysis, the rate of anticholinergic drug use was 19.5% greater among patients treated with risperidone than among patients treated with olanzapine (P < 0.05). In the direct comparative RCT, the rate was 13.1% higher among patients treated with risperidone (P < 0.05). The dropout rates were similar for patients treated with risperidone and those treated with olanzapine in both analyses.

CONCLUSION

An indirect meta-analysis of studies comparing olanzapine with haloperidol and risperidone with haloperidol yielded conclusions similar to those found in a direct comparative RCT of olanzapine and risperidone.