1
|
Wu Q, Wang X, Wang Y, Long YJ, Zhao JP, Wu RR. Developments in Biological Mechanisms and Treatments for Negative Symptoms and Cognitive Dysfunction of Schizophrenia. Neurosci Bull 2021; 37:1609-1624. [PMID: 34227057 PMCID: PMC8566616 DOI: 10.1007/s12264-021-00740-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The causal mechanisms and treatment for the negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia are the main issues attracting the attention of psychiatrists over the last decade. The first part of this review summarizes the pathogenesis of schizophrenia, especially the negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction from the perspectives of genetics and epigenetics. The second part describes the novel medications and several advanced physical therapies (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation) for the negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction that will optimize the therapeutic strategy for patients with schizophrenia in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiongqiong Wu
- National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Xiaoyi Wang
- National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Ying Wang
- National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Yu-Jun Long
- National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Jing-Ping Zhao
- National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China.
| | - Ren-Rong Wu
- National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China.
- Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
The objective in managing patients with schizophrenia is to provide effective control of symptoms and enable the patient to reintegrate into society. Pharmacotherapy should, therefore, aim to provide optimum symptom control with minimal side effects using a simple dosage regimen. Ideally, this would be achieved through the use of a single agent. Some patients are successfully managed with a single antipsychotic drug, but it is often necessary or thought to be necessary to use a combination of agents to provide effective treatment. One European survey reported that most patients receive two to three psychotropic agents on average, but at least 5-22% receive five or more agents [53]. Unfortunately, the addition of more agents increases the risk of drug interactions, adverse events and non-compliance. This is amplified by the paucity of evidence-based medicine currently available to guide physicians in the use of combinations of agents, and the tendency of polypharmaceutical practice to be mostly driven by personal preference, clinical experience and marketing. This article therefore briefly looks at the feasibility of using various drug classes as adjunctive therapy in patients with schizophrenia.
Collapse
|
3
|
Galderisi S, Mucci A, Buchanan RW, Arango C. Negative symptoms of schizophrenia: new developments and unanswered research questions. Lancet Psychiatry 2018; 5:664-677. [PMID: 29602739 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30050-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 256] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Revised: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Negative symptoms of schizophrenia are associated with poor functional outcome and place a substantial burden on people with this disorder, their families, and health-care systems. We summarise the evolution of the conceptualisation of negative symptoms, the most important findings, and the remaining open questions. Several studies have shown that negative symptoms might be primary to schizophrenia or secondary to other factors, and that they cluster in the domains of avolition-apathy and expressive deficit. Failure to take this heterogeneity into account might hinder progress in research on neurobiological substrates and discoveries of treatments for primary or enduring negative symptoms. Improvement in recognition and routine assessment of negative symptoms is instrumental for correct management of secondary negative symptoms that are amenable to treatment. If substantial progress is to be made in the understanding and treatment of negative symptoms, then advances in concepts and assessment should be integrated into the design of future studies of these symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvana Galderisi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
| | - Armida Mucci
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Robert W Buchanan
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Celso Arango
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain; School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Galling B, Vernon JA, Pagsberg AK, Wadhwa A, Grudnikoff E, Seidman AJ, Tsoy-Podosenin M, Poyurovsky M, Kane JM, Correll CU. Efficacy and safety of antidepressant augmentation of continued antipsychotic treatment in patients with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2018; 137:187-205. [PMID: 29431197 DOI: 10.1111/acps.12854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antidepressant augmentation of antipsychotics in schizophrenia. METHODS Systematic literature search (PubMed/MEDLINE/PsycINFO/Cochrane Library) from database inception until 10/10/2017 for randomized, double-blind, efficacy-focused trials comparing adjunctive antidepressants vs. placebo in schizophrenia. RESULTS In a random-effects meta-analysis (studies = 42, n = 1934, duration = 10.1 ± 8.1 weeks), antidepressant augmentation outperformed placebo regarding total symptom reduction [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.57 to -0.17, P < 0.001], driven by negative (SMD = -0.25, 95% CI = -0.44-0.06, P = 0.010), but not positive (P = 0.190) or general (P = 0.089) symptom reduction. Superiority regarding negative symptoms was confirmed in studies augmenting first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) (SMD = -0.42, 95% CI = -0.77, -0.07, P = 0.019), but not second-generation antipsychotics (P = 0.144). Uniquely, superiority in total symptom reduction by NaSSAs (SMD = -0.71, 95% CI = -1.21, -0.20, P = 0.006) was not driven by negative (P = 0.438), but by positive symptom reduction (SMD = -0.43, 95% CI = -0.77, -0.09, P = 0.012). Antidepressants did not improve depressive symptoms more than placebo (P = 0.185). Except for more dry mouth [risk ratio (RR) = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.04-2.36, P = 0.03], antidepressant augmentation was not associated with more adverse events or all-cause/specific-cause discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS For schizophrenia patients on stable antipsychotic treatment, adjunctive antidepressants are effective for total and particularly negative symptom reduction. However, effects are small-to-medium, differ across antidepressants, and negative symptom improvement seems restricted to the augmentation of FGAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Galling
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.,The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.,Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - J A Vernon
- The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
| | - A K Pagsberg
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Center, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Glostrup, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A Wadhwa
- The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
| | | | - A J Seidman
- Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | - M Tsoy-Podosenin
- Department of Psychiatry, St John's Episcopal Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - M Poyurovsky
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.,Tirat Carmel Mental Health Center, tirat Carmel, Israel
| | - J M Kane
- The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.,Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA.,The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - C U Correll
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.,The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.,Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA.,The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aleman A, Lincoln TM, Bruggeman R, Melle I, Arends J, Arango C, Knegtering H. Treatment of negative symptoms: Where do we stand, and where do we go? Schizophr Res 2017; 186:55-62. [PMID: 27293137 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Revised: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Negative symptoms, e.g. social withdrawal, reduced initiative, anhedonia and affective flattening, are notoriously difficult to treat. In this review, we take stock of recent research into treatment of negative symptoms by summarizing psychosocial as well as pharmacological and other biological treatment strategies. Major psychosocial approaches concern social skills training, cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis, cognitive remediation and family intervention. Some positive findings have been reported, with the most robust improvements observed for social skills training. Although cognitive behavior therapy shows significant effects for negative symptoms as a secondary outcome measure, there is a lack of data to allow for definite conclusions of its effectiveness for patients with predominant negative symptoms. With regard to pharmacological interventions, antipsychotics have been shown to improve negative symptoms, but this seems to be limited to secondary negative symptoms in acute patients. It has also been suggested that antipsychotics may aggravate negative symptoms. Recent studies have investigated glutamatergic compounds, e.g. glycine receptor inhibitors and drugs that target the NMDA receptor or metabotropic glutamate 2/3 (mGlu2/3) receptor, but no consistent evidence of improvement of negative symptoms was found. Finally, some small studies have suggested improvement of negative symptoms after non-invasive electromagnetic neurostimulation, but this has only been partly replicated and it is still unclear whether these are robust improvements. We address methodological issues, in particular the heterogeneity of negative symptoms and treatment response, and suggest avenues for future research. There is a need for more detailed studies that focus on different dimensions of negative symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Aleman
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Neuroscience, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Tania M Lincoln
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Hamburg, Germany
| | - Richard Bruggeman
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen and Rob Giel Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid Melle
- NORMENT and K.G. Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Johan Arends
- GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Center, Department of Psychotic Disorders, Assen, The Netherlands
| | - Celso Arango
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, IiSGM, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Henderikus Knegtering
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Neuroscience, Groningen, The Netherlands; GGZ Lentis Mental Health Center, Department of Psychotic Disorders, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Buoli M, Serati M, Ciappolino V, Altamura AC. May selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) provide some benefit for the treatment of schizophrenia? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2016; 17:1375-85. [DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1186646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
7
|
Baandrup L, Østrup Rasmussen J, Klokker L, Austin S, Bjørnshave T, Fuglsang Bliksted V, Fink-Jensen A, Hedegaard Fohlmann A, Peter Hansen J, Kristine Nielsen M, Sandsten KE, Schultz V, Voss-Knude S, Nordentoft M. Treatment of adult patients with schizophrenia and complex mental health needs - A national clinical guideline. Nord J Psychiatry 2016; 70:231-40. [PMID: 26328910 DOI: 10.3109/08039488.2015.1074285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The Danish Health and Medicines Authority assembled a group of experts to develop a national clinical guideline for patients with schizophrenia and complex mental health needs. Within this context, ten explicit review questions were formulated, covering several identified key issues. METHODS Systematic literature searches were performed stepwise for each review question to identify relevant guidelines, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. The quality of the body of evidence for each review question was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Clinical recommendations were developed on the basis of the evidence, assessment of the risk-benefit ratio, and perceived patient preferences. RESULTS Based on the identified evidence, a guideline development group (GDG) recommended that the following interventions should be offered routinely: antipsychotic maintenance therapy, family intervention and assertive community treatment. The following interventions should be considered: long-acting injectable antipsychotics, neurocognitive training, social cognitive training, cognitive behavioural therapy for persistent positive and/or negative symptoms, and the combination of cognitive behavioural therapy and motivational interviewing for cannabis and/or central stimulant abuse. SSRI or SNRI add-on treatment for persistent negative symptoms should be used only cautiously. Where no evidence was available, the GDG agreed on a good practice recommendation. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of this guideline in daily clinical practice can facilitate good treatment outcomes within the population of patients with schizophrenia and complex mental health needs. The guideline does not cover all available interventions and should be used in conjunction with other relevant guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lone Baandrup
- a Danish Health and Medicines Authority and Mental Health Centre Glostrup , Denmark
| | | | - Louise Klokker
- c Danish Health and Medicines Authority and the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital , Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jens Peter Hansen
- i Mental Health Services, Region of Southern Denmark and Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | - Merete Nordentoft
- l Danish Health and Medicines Authority, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen , Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Terevnikov V, Joffe G, Stenberg JH. Randomized Controlled Trials of Add-On Antidepressants in Schizophrenia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2015; 18:pyv049. [PMID: 25991654 PMCID: PMC4576515 DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2015] [Accepted: 04/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite adequate treatment with antipsychotics, a substantial number of patients with schizophrenia demonstrate only suboptimal clinical outcome. To overcome this challenge, various psychopharmacological combination strategies have been used, including antidepressants added to antipsychotics. METHODS To analyze the efficacy of add-on antidepressants for the treatment of negative, positive, cognitive, depressive, and antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms in schizophrenia, published randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of adjunctive antidepressants in schizophrenia were reviewed using the following parameters: baseline clinical characteristics and number of patients, their on-going antipsychotic treatment, dosage of the add-on antidepressants, duration of the trial, efficacy measures, and outcomes. RESULTS There were 36 randomized controlled trials reported in 41 journal publications (n=1582). The antidepressants used were the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, duloxetine, imipramine, mianserin, mirtazapine, nefazodone, reboxetin, trazodone, and bupropion. Mirtazapine and mianserin showed somewhat consistent efficacy for negative symptoms and both seemed to enhance neurocognition. Trazodone and nefazodone appeared to improve the antipsychotics-induced extrapyramidal symptoms. Imipramine and duloxetine tended to improve depressive symptoms. No clear evidence supporting selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors' efficacy on any clinical domain of schizophrenia was found. Add-on antidepressants did not worsen psychosis. CONCLUSIONS Despite a substantial number of randomized controlled trials, the overall efficacy of add-on antidepressants in schizophrenia remains uncertain mainly due to methodological issues. Some differences in efficacy on several schizophrenia domains seem, however, to exist and to vary by the antidepressant subgroups--plausibly due to differences in the mechanisms of action. Antidepressants may not worsen the course of psychosis. Better designed, larger, and longer randomized controlled trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viacheslav Terevnikov
- Kellokoski Hospital, Kellokoski, Finland (Dr Terevnikov); Department of Psychiatry, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Helsinki, Finland (Drs Joffe and Stenberg).
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
We focused on the application of antidepressants in schizophrenia treatment in this review. Augmentation of antidepressants with antipsychotics is a common clinical practice to treat resistant symptoms in schizophrenia, including depressive symptoms, negative symptoms, comorbid obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and other psychotic manifestations. However, recent systematic review of the clinical effects of antidepressants is lacking. In this review, we have selected and summarized current literature on the use of antidepressants in patients with schizophrenia; the patterns of use and effectiveness, as well as risks and drug-drug interactions of this clinical practice are discussed in detail, with particular emphasis on the treatment of depressive symptoms in schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye-Meng Mao
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Training in Mental Health, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ming-Dao Zhang
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Training in Mental Health, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Between one-third and one-half of the individuals who meet diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia remain actively ill despite optimal pharmacological treatment. These individuals tend to progressively deteriorate in terms of social and vocational functioning despite major public and private investments in their rehabilitation. For patients who do not respond to the first prescribed antipsychotic drug, current clinical practice is to switch to a second and a third drug, and eventually to clozapine, the only antipsychotic drug proven to be effective in treatment-refractory schizophrenia (TRS). Occasionally, two antipsychotics are given concomitantly or psychotropic drugs are added to antipsychotic drugs; however, very few empirical data exist to support this practice. Although there are many exceptions, patients who do not benefit from the first prescribed drug will not benefit from any pharmacological intervention. Therefore, efforts are under way to determine the reason for lack of response to available treatments and devise novel, more effective treatments. To be successful these efforts must result in a more specific definition of TRS, as well as in a better understanding of the illness pathophysiology and the mechanism of action of the drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asaf Caspi
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
The involvement of GABA(A) receptor in the molecular mechanisms of combined selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-antipsychotic treatment. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2011; 14:143-55. [PMID: 20181299 DOI: 10.1017/s1461145710000106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
There is evidence that combining selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs may improve negative symptoms in schizophrenia and resistant symptoms in obsessive-compulsive and affective disorders. To examine the mechanism of action of this treatment we investigated the molecular modulation of γ-aminobutyric acid-A (GABA(A)) receptor components and biochemical pathways associated with GABA(A) receptor function following administration of the SSRI fluvoxamine (Flu) combined with the first-generation antipsychotic haloperidol (Hal) and compared it to the individual drugs and the atypical antipsychotic clozapine (Clz). We analysed prefrontal cortices of Sprague-Dawley rats injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with the combination of Flu (10 mg/kg) and Hal (1 mg/kg), each drug alone, or Clz (10 mg/kg) after 30 min and 1 h. We found that haloperidol plus fluvoxamine (Hal-Flu) co-administration, and Clz, decreased the level of GABAAβ2/3 receptor subunit in the cytosolic fraction, and increased it in the membrane compartment in rat PFC. Flu or Hal alone did not produce changes in GABAAβ2/3 receptor protein expression. Additionally, Hal-Flu and Clz regulated molecular signalling pathways that modulate GABA(A) receptor function, including protein kinase C (PKC) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase-2 (ERK2). In primary cortical culture, short-term treatment (15 min) with Hal-Flu combination and Clz increased GABAAβ subunit phosphorylation levels. Pretreatment of the cells with PKC inhibitor abolished the effect of the combined treatment, or Clz on phosphorylation of GABA(A) receptor. Inhibition of ERK2 did not alter the effect of drugs on GABA(A) receptor phosphorylation levels. Our findings provide evidence that the combined treatment regulates GABA(A) receptor function and does so via a PKC-dependent pathway.
Collapse
|
12
|
Singh SP, Singh V, Kar N, Chan K. Efficacy of antidepressants in treating the negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 197:174-9. [PMID: 20807960 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.067710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenia continues to be a major clinical issue. AIMS To analyse the efficacy of add-on antidepressants for the treatment of negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia. METHOD Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing the effect of antidepressants and placebo on the negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia, measured through standardised rating scales. Outcome was measured as standardised mean difference between end-of-trial and baseline scores of negative symptoms. RESULTS There were 23 trials from 22 publications (n = 819). The antidepressants involved were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, mirtazapine, reboxetine, mianserin, trazodone and ritanserin; trials on other antidepressants were not available. The overall standardised mean difference was moderate (-0.48) in favour of antidepressants and subgroup analysis revealed significant responses for fluoxetine, trazodone and ritanserin. CONCLUSIONS Antidepressants along with antipsychotics are more effective in treating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia than antipsychotics alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surendra P Singh
- University of Wolverhampton and Step to Health, Wolverhampton City Primary Care Trust, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Negative symptoms are common in people with schizophrenia and are often difficult to treat with antipsychotic drugs. Treatment often involves the use of various add-on medications such as antidepressants. OBJECTIVES To review the effects of the combination of antipsychotic and antidepressant drug treatment for management of negative symptoms in schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register (January 2004). We also contacted authors of included studies in order to identify further trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised controlled trials comparing antipsychotic and antidepressant combinations with antipsychotics alone for the treatment of prominent negative symptoms in schizophrenia and/or schizophrenia-like psychoses. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Working independently, we selected and critically appraised studies, extracted data and analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Where possible and appropriate we calculated the relative risk RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI), with the number needed to treat (NNT). MAIN RESULTS We included five studies (all short-term, total N=190). We found no significant difference for 'leaving the study early for any reason' between the antipsychotic plus antidepressant combination and the control group (n=90, 3 RCTs, RR 3.0 CI 0.35 to 26.04). Leaving early due to adverse events (n=64, 2 RCTs, RR 5.0 CI 0.26 to 97.0) and leaving the study early due to inefficacy (n=34, 1 RCT, RR 3.0 CI 0.13 to 68.84) also showed no significant difference between the two treatment groups. In terms of clinical response, participants treated with the antipsychotic plus antidepressant medications showed a statistically significant greater improvement (n=30, 1 RCT, WMD -1.0 CI -1.61 to -0.39) and showed a significantly lower severity at endpoint (n=30, 1 RCT, WMD -0.9 CI -1.55 to -0.25) on the Clinical Global Impression Scale than those treated with antipsychotics alone. More people allocated to combination therapy had a clinically significant improvement in negative symptoms compared with those given antipsychotics and placebo (n=60, 2 RCTs, RR 0.56 CI 0.32 to 0.97, NNT 3 CI 3 to 34). Significant differences in favour of the combination therapy were seen in different aspects of negative symptoms: 'affective flattening' (n=30, 1 RCT, WMD -7.0 CI -10.37 to -3.63), 'alogia' (n=26, 1 RCT, WMD -3.00 CI -5.14 to -0.86) and 'avolition' (n=30, 1 RCT, WMD -3.0 CI -5.04 to -0.96). No statistically significant difference was found between treatment groups in regards to the outcome 'at least one adverse event' (n=84, 2 RCTs, RR 1.80 CI 0.66 to 4.90). For movement disorders and other adverse effects, no statistically significant differences were found in any of the studies that provided usable data on these outcomes. There are no data at all on outcomes such as compliance, cost, social and cognitive functioning, relapse, recurrence of negative symptoms, rehospitalisation or quality of life. There are no medium or long term data. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The combination of antipsychotics and antidepressants may be effective in treating negative symptoms of schizophrenia, but the amount of information is currently too limited to allow any firm conclusions. Large, pragmatic, well-designed and reported long term trials are justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Rummel
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Technischen Universität München, Möhlstr. 26, Munich, Germany 81675.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Falkai P, Wobrock T, Lieberman J, Glenthoj B, Gattaz WF, Möller HJ. World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, part 2: long-term treatment of schizophrenia. World J Biol Psychiatry 2006; 7:5-40. [PMID: 16509050 DOI: 10.1080/15622970500483177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
These guidelines for the biological treatment of schizophrenia were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). The goal during the development of these guidelines was to review systematically all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of schizophrenia, and to reach a consensus on a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating people with schizophrenia. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for schizophrenia, as well as from meta-analyses, reviews and randomised clinical trials on the efficacy of pharmacological and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). This second part of the guidelines covers the long-term treatment as well as the management of relevant side effects. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antipsychotic medication, other pharmacological treatment options, electroconvulsive therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of adults suffering from schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Falkai
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Falkai P, Wobrock T, Lieberman J, Glenthoj B, Gattaz WF, Möller HJ. World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, Part 1: acute treatment of schizophrenia. World J Biol Psychiatry 2005; 6:132-91. [PMID: 16173147 DOI: 10.1080/15622970510030090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 228] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
These guide lines for the biological treatment of schizophrenia were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBO). The goal during the development of these guidelines was to review systematically all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of schizophrenia, and to reach a consensus on a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating people with schizophrenia. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for schizophrenia, as well as from meta-analyses, reviews and randomised clinical trials on the efficacy of pharmacological and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). This first part of the guidelines covers disease definition, classification, epidemiology and course of schizophrenia, as well as the management of the acute phase treatment. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antipsychotic medication, other pharmacological treatment options, electroconvulsive therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of adults suffering from schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Falkai
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rummel C, Kissling W, Leucht S. Antidepressants as add-on treatment to antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and pronounced negative symptoms: a systematic review of randomized trials. Schizophr Res 2005; 80:85-97. [PMID: 16183258 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2005.07.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2005] [Revised: 07/25/2005] [Accepted: 07/29/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The aim of our meta-analysis was to review the evidence base for the efficacy and safety of antipsychotic and antidepressant combinations in the treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses. Randomized controlled trials comparing the combination of antidepressants and antipsychotics with antipsychotics alone for patients with pronounced negative symptoms in schizophrenia were searched for by accessing the register of randomized controlled trials of the Cochrane Schizophrenia group. The studies identified were independently inspected and their quality assessed by two reviewers. The principal outcome of interest was the reduction of negative symptoms. Dichotomous data were analyzed using the relative risk and continuous data were analyzed using standardized mean differences, both specified with 95% confidence intervals. It was possible to include seven trials (n = 202) examining antidepressants as add-on to antipsychotics in this review. Except for one study, all included studies used first generation antipsychotics. While there was often merely a trend in favour of augmentation of antipsychotics with antidepressants in the small single studies, the meta-analytic combination resulted in a statistically significant superiority in the outcome reduction of negative symptoms as a whole. Statistically significant differences between groups in terms of specific subscores of the SANS were found, but the results were inconsistent. The combination of antipsychotics and antidepressants may be more effective in treating negative symptoms of schizophrenia than antipsychotics alone, but this finding needs to be corroborated by further large trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Rummel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Möhlstr. 26, 81675 München, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Silver H. Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor augmentation in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2005; 5:2053-8. [PMID: 15461540 DOI: 10.1517/14656566.5.10.2053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Negative symptoms are core features of schizophrenia that respond poorly to first-generation antipsychotics and present a major obstacle in rehabilitation. Patients may be somewhat more responsive to clozapine and second-generation antipsychotics but even then, considerable impairment remains. This paper reviews the use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) augmentation of antipsychotics in the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Important methodological issues particular to the study of negative symptoms are also discussed. Current evidence indicates that at least two SSRIs, fluvoxamine and fluoxetine, can ameliorate primary negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenic patients treated with first-generation antipsychotics. Onset of improvement may be detected within 2 weeks of starting treatment. The combination is well-tolerated, although as antipsychotic drug concentrations may rise, close monitoring of drug doses and possibly drug concentrations is needed. So far, evidence regarding SSRI augmentation of second-generation antipsychotics is limited and in view of the increasing use of these newer agents, controlled studies are urgently needed. SSRI augmentation may be a useful addition to the treatment of schizophrenic patients with persistent negative symptoms. The paradoxical findings that both clozapine, a serotonin antagonist, and an SSRI antidepressant added to antipsychotics, can improve negative symptoms suggests that these pharmacologically distinct treatments may share common final mechanisms. A better understanding of these mechanisms can shed light on the pathogenesis of negative symptoms and provide new targets for drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Silver
- Sha'ar Menashe Mental Health Center, Mobile Post Hefer 38814, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Combination treatments, especially combinations of antipsychotics, are used frequently for schizophrenia, despite a paucity of evidence regarding their safety and efficacy. Because the literature basis is weak and expert recommendations are largely lacking, providers should be vigilant in documenting improved outcomes for patients thought to benefit from combination treatments. Target symptoms that have been studied include psychosis, cognitive deficits, and negative symptoms. The strongest evidence is for augmentation of clozapine with another antipsychotic or with electroconvulsive therapy for persistent positive symptoms. Combination treatments for cognitive deficits and negative symptoms are being actively investigated, but current evidence is insufficient to recommend available agents for these components of schizophrenia. It is important that appropriate monotherapies be given adequate trials before resorting to combination therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander L Miller
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
This article presents a systematic review of pharmacological treatment for negative symptoms of schizophrenia, based on MEDLINE searches from 1995 to September 2002 to identify pertinent clinical trials. The pharmacotherapy of negative symptoms in schizophrenia includes novel/atypical antipsychotics and classical antipsychotics, as well as antidepressants, glutamatergic compounds, antiepileptic drugs and estrogens. In the assessment of therapy for negative symptoms of schizophrenia, it is imperative that better studies of sound methodology are performed. In such studies, some important aspects to be considered include an accurate definition and assessment of negative symptoms (including well designed, valid and reliable rating scales), the differentiation between primary and secondary negative symptoms, an appropriate selection of standard comparators, adequate dosages of comparators (e.g. haloperidol dosages) and an overall optimal study design. Most of the available studies on treating negative symptoms in schizophrenia have focused on the atypical antipsychotics, while other potential candidates, mostly in the context of add-on therapy, have not been so intensively investigated. Atypical antipsychotics have been proven in placebo-controlled trials to be effective in treating negative symptoms of acute schizophrenic episodes. In many of the comparator studies, they showed efficacy in treating negative symptoms that was superior to that of typical antipsychotics. Data on stable, predominant negative symptoms in subchronic or chronic cases of schizophrenia, although limited, have demonstrated the efficacy of atypical antipsychotics. If the beneficial tolerability profile with respect to extrapyramidal symptoms is also taken into account during clinical decision making, the atypical antipsychotics should be preferred for the treatment of negative symptoms. It is also worth noting that the traditional antipsychotics have the risk of inducing negative symptoms in the context of akinesia. The benefits of add-on therapy with SSRIs or a glutamatergic compound are well documented. Estrogen add-on therapy seems promising. Other traditionally suggested approaches, such as comedication with an antiepileptic drug, lithium or beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, cannot generally be recommended on the basis of the available data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Jürgen Möller
- Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Silver H. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor augmentation in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2003; 18:305-13. [PMID: 14571150 DOI: 10.1097/00004850-200311000-00001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia presents a major clinical challenge. This review examines the evidence pertaining to the efficacy, tolerability and safety of adding selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to antipsychotic agents in the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Important methodological issues such as differentiating primary and secondary negative symptoms are discussed. The balance of available evidence indicates that at least some SSRIs, fluvoxamine and fluoxetine, can ameliorate primary negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenia patients who are treated with typical antipsychotics. The combination is safe and well tolerated although, as antipsychotic drug concentrations may be elevated, attention to dose and drug monitoring should be considered as appropriate. The effect of SSRI augmentation of atypical antipsychotics requires further study. Combination with clozapine may require particular caution because of potential toxicity if serum clozapine levels rise steeply. SSRI augmentation may be a useful addition to the treatment of schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Silver
- Sha'ar Menashe Mental Health Center, Israel Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Whitehead C, Moss S, Cardno A, Lewis G. Antidepressants for people with both schizophrenia and depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 2002:CD002305. [PMID: 12076447 PMCID: PMC6669259 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depressive symptoms, often of substantial severity, are found in 50% of newly diagnosed suffers of schizophrenia and 33% of people with chronic schizophrenia who have relapsed. Depression is associated with dysphoria, disability, reduction of motivation to accomplish tasks and the activities of daily living, an increased duration of illness and more frequent relapses. OBJECTIVES To determine the clinical effects of antidepressant medication for the treatment of depression in people who also suffer with schizophrenia. SEARCH STRATEGY We undertook electronic searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (October 2000), ClinPsych (1988-2000), The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2000), EMBASE (1980-2000) and MEDLINE (1966-2000). This was supplemented by citation searching, personal contact with authors and pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised clinical trials that compared antidepressant medication with placebo for people with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were also suffering from depression. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Data were independently selected and extracted. For homogeneous dichotomous data the fixed effects risk difference (RD), the 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, reviewers calculated weighted mean differences. Statistical tests for heterogeneity were also undertaken. MAIN RESULTS Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. All were small, and randomised fewer than 30 people to each group. Most included people after the most acute phase of psychosis and investigated a wide range of antidepressants. The quality of reporting varied a great deal. For the outcome of 'no important clinical response' antidepressants were significantly better than placebo (n=209, 5 RCTs, summary risk difference fixed effects -0.26, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.13, NNT 4 95% CI 3 to 8). The depression score at the end of the trial, as assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale (HAM-D), seemed to suggest that using antidepressants was beneficial, but this was only statistically significant when a fixed effects model was used (n=261, 6 RCTs, WMD fixed effects -2.2 95% CI -3.8 to -0.6; WMD random effects -2.1 95% CI -5.04 to 0.84). There was no evidence that antidepressant treatment led to a deterioration of psychotic symptoms in the included trials. Heterogeneous data on 'any adverse effect' are equivocal (n=110, 2 RCTs, RD fixed 0.11 CI -0.03 to 0.25, Chi square 7.5, df=1, p=0.0062). In one small study extrapyramidal adverse effects were reported less often by those allocated to antidepressant (n=52, 1 RCT, RD fixed -0.28 CI -0.5 to -0.04). Only about 10% of people left these studies by 12 weeks. There was no apparent difference between those allocated placebo and those given an antidepressant (n=426, 10 RCTs, RD fixed 0.04 CI -0.02 to 0.1). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS Overall, the literature was of poor quality, and only a small number of trials made useful contributions. Though our results provide some evidence to indicate that antidepressants may be beneficial for people with depression and schizophrenia, the results, at best, are likely to overestimate the treatment effect, and, at worst, could merely reflect selective reporting of statistically significant results and publication bias. At present, there is no convincing evidence to support or refute the use of antidepressants in treating depression in people with schizophrenia. We need further well-designed, conducted and reported research to determine the best approach towards treating depression in people with schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Whitehead
- Public Health and Policy, Bro Taf Health Authority, Temple of Peace & Health, Cathays Park, Cardiff, South Wales, UK, CF10 3NW.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Schizophrenia is a common mental disorder that has an early onset and rates high as a cause of medical disability. Antipsychotic agents are the mainstay of treatment but response is often inadequate. Negative symptoms (disturbances in volition, social interaction and affective functions) are particularly difficult to treat and form a major obstacle to rehabilitation. A promising approach to improve response of negative symptoms has been to add a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant to antipsychotic treatment. This review examines evidence pertaining to the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the SSRI fluvoxamine, combined with antipsychotic agents, in the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Important methodological issues, such as differentiating primary and secondary negative symptoms, are discussed. The balance of available evidence indicates that fluvoxamine can improve primary negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenia patients treated with typical antipsychotics and suggests that it may also do so in some patients treated with clozapine. This combination is generally safe and well tolerated although, as antipsychotic drug concentrations may be elevated, attention to dose and drug monitoring should be considered appropriately. Combination with clozapine may require particular caution because of potential toxicity if serum clozapine levels rise steeply. The fluvoxamine doses effective in augmentation are lower than those usually used to treat depression. Evidence regarding the use of fluvoxamine augmentation to treat phenomena, such as obsessions and aggression, which may be associated with schizophrenia, is also examined. An important goal of future studies will be to define which patient groups can benefit from combined treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Silver
- Sha'ar Menashe Mental Health Center, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Suicide and suicide attempts occur at a significantly greater rate in schizophrenia than in the general population. Common estimates are that 10% of people with schizophrenia will eventually have a completed suicide, and that attempts are made at two to five times that rate. Demographically associated with suicidality in schizophrenia are being young, being early in the course of the illness, being male, coming from a high socioeconomic family background, having high intelligence, having high expectations, not being married, lacking social supports, having awareness of symptoms, and being recently discharged from the hospital. Also associated are reduced self-esteem, stigma, recent loss or stress, hopelessness, isolation, treatment non-compliance and substance abuse. Clinically, the most common correlates of suicidality in schizophrenia are depressive symptoms and the depressive syndrome, although severe psychotic and panic-like symptoms may contribute as well. This review specifically explores the issue of depression in schizophrenia, in relation to suicide, by organizing the differential diagnosis of this state and highlighting their potentially treatable or correctable causes. This differential diagnosis includes both acute and chronic disappointment reactions, the prodrome of an acute psychotic episode, neuroleptic induced akinesia and akathisia, the possibility of direct neuroleptic-induced depression, negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and the possible co-occurrence of an independent depressive diathesis. The potential beneficial roles of 'atypical' antipsychotic agents, including both clozapine and more novel agents, and adjunctive treatment with other psychopharmacological medications are considered, and the important roles of psychosocial factors and interventions are recognized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S G Siris
- Department of Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital Division of the North Shore, Long Island Jewish Health System and The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|