Tibial portal placement: the radiographic correlate of the anatomic safe zone

Refined Techniques in Tibial Nailing

Intramedullary nail fixation of unstable tibial diaphyseal fractures is commonly used with excellent clinical results. Indications for nailing have rapidly expanded over recent years, allowing for more difficult fractures to be addressed with "extreme nailing." Despite its widespread use, evolution of newer nailing systems and varying techniques for insertion bring new difficulties with tibial fracture reduction, and malalignment occurs with relative frequency. This highlights the need for a methodical approach for efficient and predictable tibial nailing. An algorithmic approach is essential, beginning with identifying challenging patterns in proximal and distal fractures and addressing any intra-articular elements initially. A semiextended approach is helpful to neutralize deforming forces. Optimizing the starting point and confirming lateral termination of the guidewire mitigate fracture malreduction after nail placement. Fracture reduction is facilitated with clamps, fibular or tibial plating, blocking screws or wires, external fixation, universal distractor, or manual manipulation to optimize outcomes and avoid pitfalls in an effective tibial nailing.

Comparison of the efficacy of intramedullary nailing via the lateral parapatellar approach versus the infrapatellar approach in the treatment of tibial metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy of intramedullary nailing via the lateral parapatellar approach versus the infrapatellar approach in treating fractures at the tibial metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 45 patients with proximal or distal tibial fractures treated with intramedullary nailing via lateral parapatellar approach (n = 23) or infrapatellar approach (n = 22) between January 2019 and March 2023. We recorded and compared the operative time, intraoperative blood loss/fluoroscopies, success rate of closed reduction, anteroposterior and lateral entry point accuracy, postoperative infection, fracture healing time, as well as NRS pain scores, Lysholm knee function scores, and knee range of motion.

RESULTS

Both groups completed the surgery without any complications. The lateral parapatellar approach group had significantly better results regarding shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, and fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies compared to the infrapatellar approach group (P < 0.05). All cases in the lateral parapatellar approach group achieved closed reduction, while 10 cases in the infrapatellar approach group required open reduction. Fractures in both groups healed successfully, without statistically difference in healing time (P > 0.05). The accuracy of anteroposterior and lateral entry points was better with lateral parapatellar approach (P < 0.05). At 3 and 12 months postoperatively, lateral parapatellar approach showed better Lysholm and NRS scores compared to infrapatellar approach (P < 0.05). Two groups had no significant difference in range of motion (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral parapatellar approach combined with the blocking screw technique provides superior clinical outcomes compared to infrapatellar approach in the treatment of proximal or distal tibial fractures, making it suitable for further investigation.

Outcome Following Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Diaphyseal Fractures: Suprapatellar Nail Insertion Results in Superior Radiographic Parameters But No Difference in Mid-Term Function

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study was to compare the radiographic parameters (nail insertion-point accuracy [NIPA] and fracture malalignment) of patients who had undergone tibial intramedullary nailing via the suprapatellar (SP) and infrapatellar (IP) approaches. The secondary aims were to compare clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between these approaches.

METHODS

All adult patients with an acute tibial diaphyseal fracture who underwent intramedullary nailing at a single level-I trauma center over a 4-year period (2017 to 2020) were retrospectively identified. The nailing approach (SP or IP) was at the treating surgeon's discretion. Intraoperative and immediate postoperative radiographs were reviewed to assess NIPA (mean distance from the optimal insertion point) and malalignment (≥5°). Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to evaluate the rates of malunion, nonunion, and other postoperative complications. The Oxford and Lysholm Knee Scores (OKS and LKS) and patient satisfaction (0 = completely dissatisfied, 100 = completely satisfied) were obtained via a postal survey at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 219 consecutive patients (mean age, 48 years [range, 16 to 90 years], 51% [112] male). There were 61 patients (27.9%) in the SP group and 158 (72.1%) in the IP group. The groups did not differ in baseline demographic or injury-related variables. SP nailing was associated with superior coronal NIPA (p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI] for IP versus SP, 1.17 to 3.60 mm) and sagittal NIPA (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.97 mm) and with a reduced rate of malalignment (3% [2 of 61] versus 11% [18 of 158] for IP; p = 0.030). PROs were available for 118 of 211 patients (56%; 32 of 58 in the SP group and 86 of 153 in the IP group) at a mean of 3 years (range, 1.2 to 6.5 years). There was no difference between the SP and IP groups in mean OKS (36.5 versus 39.6; p = 0.246), LKS (71.2 versus 73.5; p = 0.696), or satisfaction scores (81.4 versus 79.9; p = 0.725).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with IP nailing, SP nailing of tibial shaft fractures was associated with superior NIPA and a reduced rate of intraoperative malalignment but not of malunion at healing. However, the superior NIPA may not be clinically important. Furthermore, there were no differences in PROs at mid-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Avoiding deformity in proximal tibial nailing: risk factors, deformity rules, tips, and tricks

Malalignment is one of the most common problems linked to nailing of proximal tibial fractures. This review will cover technical aspects of intramedullary nailing and will help explain the various risk factors. Deformity rules aid in identifying the likely deformity and help to develop management strategies. Various tools and techniques are discussed which can help optimize the outcome.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level V.

Locked Plating versus Nailing for Proximal Tibia Fractures: A Multicenter RCT

OBJECTIVES

The main 2 forms of treatment for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures are intramedullary nailing (IMN) and locked lateral plating (LLP). The goal of this multicenter, randomized controlled trial was to determine whether there are significant differences in outcomes between these forms of treatment.

DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

16 academic trauma centers.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

108 patients were enrolled. 99 patients were followed for 12 months. 52 patients were randomized to IMN, and 47 patients were randomized to LLP.

INTERVENTION

IMN or lateral locked plating.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Functional scoring including Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, Bother Index, EQ-5Dindex and EQ-5DVAS. Secondary measures included alignment, operative time, range of motion, union rate, pain, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, need for ambulatory aid and number, and complications.

RESULTS

Functional testing demonstrated no difference between the groups, but both groups were still significantly affected 12 months postinjury. Similarly, there was no difference in time of surgery, alignment, nonunion, pain, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, need for ambulatory support, or complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Both IMN and LLP provide for similar outcomes after these fractures. Patients continue to improve over the course of the year after injury but remain impaired even 1 year later.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Osteosynthesis of extra-articular proximal tibial fractures]

The treatment of extra-articular proximal tibial fractures is a therapeutic challenge due to the frequently significant soft tissue injury, the effect of the deforming forces and the need for an exact restoration of the bony alignment. Various methods of osteosynthesis are available for surgical stabilization. The locking plate osteosynthesis is the most frequently used procedure because of its good biomechanical stability, especially in osteoporotic bones, and the protection of the periosteal blood flow. Depending on the extent and stability of the defect zone, especially in the case of a medial comminuted zone and the bone quality, bilateral plate osteosynthesis can be necessary. If the proximal fragment is big enough, closed reduction and intramedullary nailing are possible. In the case of severely compromised soft tissue or very short epiphyseal fragments, the construction of an external fixator, e.g. hybrid external fixator, is recommended, which also allows definitive treatment under early full weight bearing. The most important complications are axial and torsional malalignments.

Nail insertion points in semi-extended nailing of tibial fractures and their influence on alignment: A retrospective cohort study comparing two nail insertion techniques

INTRODUCTION

Semi-extended tibial nailing techniques include the extra-articular technique (EAT) and the patellar eversion technique (PET). These approaches differ regarding the exposure of the patellar retinaculum and the size of the surgical field. This study compared the postoperative alignment and intramedullary nailing entry points between the EAT and PET for tibial fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 54 patients (aged ≥18 years) who had undergone intramedullary nailing by the EAT (n = 29) or PET (n = 25) for a tibial shaft fracture were evaluated. The intramedullary nailing entry point and postoperative alignment were measured, and the 1-year postoperative follow-up results were compared.

RESULTS

For the EAT and PET, the intramedullary nailing entry point was located at a mean distance of 4.04 mm medial to the optimal entry point and 0.27 mm lateral to the optimal entry point, respectively. The mean angular deformation observed in anteroposterior radiographs following surgery using the EAT and PET were 2.49° and 0.32° valgus, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The intramedullary nailing entry point affected postoperative alignment. Intramedullary nailing may result in malalignment while performing the EAT due to the interference of the patella at the time of nailing.

Rethinking the Coronal Anatomic Axis of the Distal Tibia for Intramedullary Nail Placement: A Cadaveric Study

Background: Recent studies have reported that targeting a center-center position at the distal tibia during intramedullary nailing (IMN) may result in malalignment. Although not fully understood, this observation suggests that the coronal anatomic center of the tibia may not correspond to the center of the distal tibia articular surface. Questions/Purposes: To identify the coronal anatomic axis of the distal tibia that corresponds to an ideal start site for IMN placement utilizing intact cadaveric tibiae. Methods: IMN placement was performed in 9 fresh frozen cadaveric tibiae. A guidewire was used to identify the ideal start site in the proximal tibia and an opening reamer allowed access to the canal. Each nail was then advanced without the use of a reaming rod until exiting the distal tibia plafond. Cadaveric and radiographic measurements were performed to determine the center of the nail exit site in the coronal plane. Results: Cadaveric and radiographic measurements identified the IMN exit site to correspond with the lateral 59.5% and 60.4% of the plafond, respectively. Conclusions: Tibial nails inserted using an ideal start site have an endpoint that corresponds roughly to the junction of the lateral and middle third of the plafond. Further studies are warranted to better understand the impact of IMN endpoint placement on the functional and radiographic outcomes of tibia shaft fractures.

Native tibia valga: a potential source of varus malreduction during intramedullary tibial nail fixation of tibial shaft fractures

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of native tibia valga on intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation of tibial shaft fractures.

METHODS

Retrospective comparative cohort analysis of 110 consecutive patients with tibial shaft fractures undergoing IMN fixation at an urban level one trauma centre was performed. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed for demographics, tibia centre of rotation of angulation (CORA), nail starting point, incidence of varus malreduction, and nail/canal proportional fit.

RESULTS

Tibia valga (CORA of ≥ 3 degrees) was present in 37 (33.6%) patients. The anatomic nail starting point distance (in relation to the lateral tibial spine) was significantly greater in the tibia valga group (12.0 mm vs. 5.0 mm, mean difference: 7.1 mm, 95% CI: 5.8 to 8.3 mm, p < 0.0001). Varus malreduction was more common in the tibia valga group (10.8% vs. 1.4%, proportional difference: 9.4%, 95% CI: - 1.0 to 21.3%, p = 0.04). Varus malreduction in the tibia valga group was associated with a decreased nail width/inner canal width proportion on multivariate analysis (OR = 0.683, 95% CI: 0.468 to 0.995, p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

Native tibia valga is common, and the use of a standard coronal IMN starting point with poor nail fit can lead to iatrogenic varus malreduction. In patients with tibia valga, maximizing nail fit or utilization of a medial starting point should be considered.

A Review of Proximal Tibia Entry Points for Intramedullary Nailing and Validation of The Lateral Parapatellar Approach as Extra-articular

Tibial shaft fractures are the most common long bone injury and are often treated surgically in an attempt to minimize complications. Although treatment options for tibial shaft fractures vary based on factors including open injury, severity of fracture, and soft tissue status, intramedullary nailing in adults has emerged as the preferred definitive option for stabilization. Therefore, the primary purposes of this review and cadaveric study were to evaluate the entry points for reamed tibial nails and the risks, benefits, and advantages of each approach. Due to concerns of violating the joint capsule and the generalized applicability to everyday practice of the extra-articular lateral parapatellar semi-extended technique, the secondary goal of this manuscript was to evaluate whether an intramedullary tibial nail can be consistently placed extra-articularly using the lateral parapatellar technique described by Kubiak et al. and generalizability to surgeons of varying experience.

Defining the Ideal "Nail Exit Path" of a Tibial Intramedullary Nail-A Computed Tomography Analysis of 860 Tibiae

OBJECTIVES

To identify the ideal distal nail position in the distal tibia, using a computed tomography analysis.

METHODS

Three-dimensional models of 860 left tibiae were analyzed using the Stryker Orthopaedic Modeling and Analytics software (SOMA, Stryker, Kiel, Germany). The nail axis was defined by 7 center points at the middle of the inner cortical boundary. The point where this line fell relative to the center of the tibial plafond in both the anteroposterior and mediolateral planes was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean mediolateral offset of the tibial nail exit path was 4.4 ± 0.2 mm (95% confidence interval) lateral to the center of the tibial plafond. The mean anteroposterior offset of the tibial nail exit path was 0.6 ± 0.1 mm anterior to the center of the tibial plafond.

CONCLUSIONS

We have presented an anatomic study analyzing the ideal nail exit path using computed tomography scans of 860 tibiae. We defined that the ideal nail exit path of a tibial nail is lateral with respect to the center of the tibial plafond. This is supported by previous clinical studies and has significant implications for preventing malalignment when treating distal tibial fractures with intramedullary nailing.

The Clamshell Osteotomy for Diaphyseal Malunion in Deformity Correction and Fracture Surgery

Diaphyseal malunion poses a great challenge for the orthopedic surgeon, and an inundation of morbidity for the patient. Diaphyseal malunion can cause altered gait, adjacent joint osteoarthritis and body dissatisfaction. This problem is fraught with complications without surgical intervention. There is a myriad of options for the management of a diaphyseal malunion. The clamshell osteotomy was engendered to ameliorate the difficulty in managing this issue. This technique is a viable option to correct diaphyseal malunion about the femur and tibia. Recently, the indications of a clamshell osteotomy have been expanded to function as a derotational or shortening osteotomy.

Utilizing the various forms of the gastrocnemius muscle in fix & flap protocol: a reliable remedy for open proximal tibial fractures with accompanying soft tissue defect

BACKGROUND

Open proximal tibial fractures accompanied by soft tissue loss are substantially challenging to accomplish both bony consolidation and wound healing. The authors retrospectively delineated the utility of the various forms of the gastrocnemius muscle in fix & flap regimen for management of such complicated injuries.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with open fracture accompanied by soft tissue loss of proximal tibia were managed by the protocol of fix & gastrocnemius flap. The collected data included implant for fixation, form of the gastrocnemius flap, postoperative complications, union time, and clinical assessment.

RESULTS

According to fixation devices, lateral anatomical locking compression plates were selected in 28 cases, dual plates in 1, and interlocking nails in 2. According to the forms of the gastrocnemius flap, medial gastrocnemius flap was utilized in 22 cases, medial hemigastrocnemius flap in 2, medial myocutaneous gastrocnemius flap in 2, lateral gastrocnemius flap in 3, and combined medial and lateral gastrocnemius flaps in 2. All flaps completely survived without any flap-related complications. Fracture consolidation was established in all patients with an average period of 19.9 weeks (range 16-26). Surgical site infection occurred in 3 cases, and delayed union in 1. By functional score of Puno, 3 cases were determined to be excellent, 27 to be good, and 1 to be fair.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent use of internal fixation and gastrocnemius flap reconstruction is a reliable and efficient protocol in managing open fractures with accompanying soft tissue defect of proximal tibia.

Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar nailing for tibial shaft fractures: A comparison of surgical and clinical outcomes between two approaches

BACKGROUND

Tibial shaft fractures are a relatively common injury and contemporary treatment includes on-axis fixation with a locked intramedullary nail in the majority of cases. The conventional technique is via an infrapatellar approach but currently there is a trend towards the use of a suprapatellar approach. We compared key variables including operative time, radiation exposure and early patient reported outcomes when adopting a suprapatellar approach to tibial nailing in our unit versus our previous experience of infrapatellar tibial nailing.

METHOD

Twenty-eight consecutive patients with tibial fracture underwent tibial nailing via the suprapatellar (SPN) approach. Six patients in the study group were excluded due polytrauma and need for dual orthopaedic and plastic surgery management. We compared outcomes with our most recent 20 consecutive patients who had undergone tibial nailing via an infrapatellar (IPN) approach. Primary surgical outcomes were: operative time, radiation exposure and accuracy of entry point of the nail on both anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Clinical outcomes included time to weightbearing, time to radiographic union and patient-reported outcome score (Lysholm score).

RESULTS

Forty-eight consecutive patients underwent intramedullary nail fixation for tibial shaft fractures and 42 were eligible for inclusion in our study (22 SPN vs 20 IPN). There were no significant differences in patient demographics or injury patterns between the two groups. Operative time and radiation exposure were significantly lower in the SPN group when compared to the IPN group (115 min vs 139 min ± 12.5) (36 cGY/cm² vs 76.33 cGY/cm² +/- 20.1). Furthermore, patients in the SPN group reported superior outcome scores at a mean follow up of 3 months (8-24 weeks) There were no observed differences in complication rate between groups and time of final clinical follow up at a minimum of 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that adoption of the SPN approach requires minimal learning curve, and has the potential benefits of reduced operative time, radiation exposure and superior patient reported outcomes when compared to the conventional infrapatellar approach.

The Influence of Sagittal Proximal Tibial Anatomy in Tibial Intramedullary Nailing

OBJECTIVES

To quantify anatomic variation in sagittal proximal tibial anatomy and determine if anatomy or nail insertion method influences the radiographic nail position.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Forty-five patients with 46 tibia fractures (OTA/AO 41A, 42, and 43) treated with infrapatellar (IP) or suprapatellar (SP) nailing. The average patient age was 40.6 years (range 19-62 years).

INTERVENTION

Patients received IP or SP nailing. Cohorts were analyzed based on the nailing technique and proximal tibial anatomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Proximal tibial radiographic anatomy was quantified using novel measurements [anterior tubercle angle (ATA) and entry point position (EPP)]. Nail entry point, entry point displacement after reaming, nail position, and quality of reduction was measured and compared between groups.

RESULTS

ATA was highly variable between patients. ATA was strongly correlated with EPP with a higher ATA associated with EPP more colinear with the intramedullary canal. Patients with low ATA treated with IP nailing had significantly longer operative times (60.0 vs. 45.7 minutes). Low ATA tibias had a higher incidence of entry point displacement due to eccentric reaming compared with high ATA tibias (70% vs. 38%) with the highest incidence of entry point displacement and absolute displacement in low ATA tibias treated with IP nailing (86%, 2.8 mm). SP nailing demonstrated shorter operative times relative to IP nailing (45.5 vs. 55.6 minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable variability in proximal tibial anatomy and these features influences the nail position within the tibia. These differences in anatomy should be considered to potentially reduce operative times, entry point displacement and anteriorization of tibial nails.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intramedullary nailing via suprapatellar approach versus locked plating of proximal extra-articular tibial fractures: a randomized control trial

OBJECTIVE

Currently, nailing through the suprapatellar approach and minimally invasive plating have been generally accepted in the management of displaced proximal tibial fractures. This investigation was aimed at comparing these two treatment methods in terms of their effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

We randomized 328 patients into one of two groups: one underwent intramedullary nailing via the suprapatellar approach (IMN group), while the other underwent locking compressive plate (LCP group) placement. The primary outcome was the Iowa Knee Score at 12 months. The clinical history, amount of intra-operative blood loss, rate of fracture healing, and post-operative complications were assessed as secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed at one, two, three, six and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Follow-up data for a year were available for 152 and 154 patients in the IMN group and LCP group, respectively. No intergroup difference was detected with regard to the Iowa Knee Scores (91 ± 8.2 in the IMN group and 90 ± 7.3 in the LCP group, respectively (p = 0.26)), at 12 months. Duration of operation (83.5 ± 35.3 min), amount of blood loss (55 ± 43 mL), duration of fluoroscopy (53.7 ± 3.9 s), and cases with difficult reduction (n = 46) in the IMN group did not differ significantly from those in the LCP group (80.1 ± 43.6 min; 65 ± 56 mL; 48 ± 12 s; 32) (p < 0.05). The two groups had similar post-operative complications and rate of fracture union, with the pre-injury activity level being restored in most patients. Removal of the implants was performed in 31.6% and 63.0% of the cases in the IMN and LCP groups, respectively, indicating a significant intergroup difference.

CONCLUSION

Both IMN through the suprapatellar approach and minimally invasive LCP were found to yield no significant intergroup difference of clinical outcomes in the treatment of proximal, extra-articular tibial fractures. However, the requirement of implant removal was more relevant to LCP.

Radiographic Evaluation of the Tibial Intramedullary Nail Entry Point

INTRODUCTION

Tibia fractures are common injuries that can often be effectively treated with intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation. The ideal starting point for IMN reaming and nail placement is well described and regarded as a crucial aspect in the technique. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy and precision with which the starting point is established and if this is maintained after nail insertion during fracture fixation.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive tibia fractures treated by IMN fixation sized 9 to 13 mm through an infrapatellar or medial parapatellar approach and 50 treated with a suprapatellar approach were evaluated. The starting point for reaming and IMN placement was measured using intraoperative fluoroscopy. Postoperative radiographs were used to determine the center of the IMN after placement. The distance between the measured points and the ideal starting point was measured.

RESULTS

Deviation from the ideal entry point on intraoperative fluoroscopy averaged 4.6 ± 4.0 mm medially, 2.9 ± 3.7 mm anteriorly, and 2.7 ± 3.3 mm distally. In 30% of cases, the final IMN position varied from the entry point by greater than one SD in the coronal or sagittal plane. No difference between approaches was appreciated.

DISCUSSION

Although the ideal starting point for tibial IMN fixation is known, this is frequently not the starting point accepted in practice. Final position of the IMN is independent of IMN size or approach and is not markedly different than the obtained starting point.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III.

Plate-Assisted Intramedullary Nailing of Proximal Third Tibia Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To report on the safety of unicortical plate stabilization in conjunction with intramedullary nailing (IMN) of proximal third tibia fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

A Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

All Orthopaedic Trauma Association 41A and 42A/B/C proximal tibia fractures treated with IMN from January 2011 to May 2018 were reviewed. Fifty-three proximal tibia fractures in 50 patients were included in the study. Twenty-four patients were treated with plate-assisted reduction and IMN, and 29 were treated with IMN alone. The plate-assisted IMN cohort was subdivided into patients with plate retention and those that had the plate removed.

INTERVENTION

Plate-assisted IMN and IMN only.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Patients were followed up for evidence of nonunion, reduction quality, postoperative infection, and rate of implant removal.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between plate-assisted IMN and IMN only for age, fracture type, mechanism of injury, quality of reduction, or implant removal rate. Open fractures were treated more often with plate-assisted IMN (88%) compared with the number of open fractures treated with IMN only (12%). There were no differences in nonunion rate or rate of postoperative infection between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Plate-assisted IMN of proximal third tibia fractures can safely be performed even in open tibia fractures with similar rates of nonunion, infection, and implant removal rates to patients treated with IMN only.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The standard sagittal starting point and entry angle for tibia intramedullary nails results in malreduction of proximal tibial fractures

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the sagittal starting point and entry angle necessary for anatomic reduction in proximal tibial fractures and to compare reductions obtained using a standard versus modified sagittal entry angle.

METHODS

Extra-articular proximal tibial fracture sawbone models were divided into three groups. The first group was used to determine the sagittal starting point and entry angle necessary for an anatomic reduction by inserting nails into the distal fragment and then reducing the proximal fragment over the nail. The second and third groups had nails inserted through the standard coronal and sagittal starting point using the standard sagittal entry angle (parallel to the anterior cortex) versus a more posteriorly directed modified sagittal entry angle (directed at the center of the tibia at the level of the tibia tubercle prominence). Fracture gapping and translation in the sagittal plane were measured for each group.

RESULTS

Anatomic reduction was only possible with a sagittal starting point that was too posterior for actual use. The standard sagittal entry angle resulted in greater posterior fracture translation and less anterior fracture gapping then the modified sagittal entry angle, 10.6 ± 1.1 versus 1.6 ± 2.8 mm (p < 0.01) and 1.3 ± 0.5 versus 5.3 ± 2.5 mm (p = 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic reduction was not achieved with the standard sagittal starting point and entry angle. Considering these finding, surgeons should have a low threshold to utilize adjunct reduction methods for these injuries.

A comparison of the use of a suprapatellar Chinese Aircraft-shaped Sleeve System versus suprapatellar intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures: Outcomes over a one-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the Chinese Aircraft-shaped Sleeve (CASS) system on the clinical outcomes of tibial intermedullary nailing using a suprapatellar approach for the treatment of tibial fractures in a cohort of adult Chinese patients over a minimum one-year follow-up.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, skeletally mature patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) type 42 tibial shaft fractures were randomized into either a SP approach using CASS group or a conventional SP approach group after informed consent was obtained. The operations were performed by a single senior orthopaedic surgeon according to group assignments. A group of 33 patients were treated using the CASS system and the other group of 34 patients were treated using a conventional SP approach. Both groups fully complied with research requirements and completed 12 months of follow-up. Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained for the evaluation of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) and residual debris preoperatively, as well as one week and 12 months postoperatively. Radiographs were used to assess alignment and union, visual analog scores (VAS) were used to assess anterior knee pain, and range of motion (ROM) and the Lysholm knee scoring scales were used for evaluating the operated knee at the 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Differences in cartilage lesion changes observed by MRI between the two groups were statistically significant (P = 0.030 at 1 week postoperatively; P = 0.025 at 12 months postoperatively). No significant differences were evident with respect to debris residue, malalignments, nonunion, VAS, ROM and Lysholm knee scoring scale with the exception of stair climbing (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Based on the data of this one-year clinical follow-up study, the SP approach using the CASS system offers the potential to benefit patients suffering from tibial shaft fractures, who will be treated with intramedullary nailing especially for smaller patients.

Implications of three-dimensional modeling of tibia for intramedullary nail fixation: A virtual study on Asian cadaver tibia

INTRODUCTION

To determine the optimal entry point (EP) of intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation and introduce a consistent landmark for practical application by analyzing three-dimensional (3D) modeling and virtual implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 104 cadaveric femurs (50 males and 54 females) underwent continuous 1.0 mm slice computed tomography (CT) scans. CT images were imported into Mimics® software to reconstruct 3D model of tibiofibular bone with medullary canal. Expert Tibial Nail (ETN®, Ø12mm/Length 315 mm) was processed into a 3D model at the actual size and optimally implanted in the tibia. After IMN was aligned in a neutral position, it was defined as a true AP projection. In the true AP projection, optimal EP and relationship with adjacent structures were assessed based on the degree of tibial rotation.

RESULTS

EP was placed eccentrically around the lateral tibial spine in cephalad view and in true AP projection in all models. In true AP projection, the overlapping point between fibular tip and cortical margin of lateral condyle was placed lateral to the fibular tip in 62 models, and exactly matched with fibular tip in 42 models. As tibia rotates, the position of EP in the AP view changes. When tibia was externally rotated, EP was located to the lateral, not the medial side of the lateraltibialspine. The obliquity of guide wire also changed withtibialrotation; the obliquity of guide wire aligned in a straight in true AP projection.

CONCLUSION

Optimal determination of EP and guide wire direction should be performed by considering the overlapping point that should be placed to just or lateral side of fibular tip in AP projection. Compared with fibular bisector line, the overlapping point is also useful as a practical landmark for making true AP projection and determining optimal EP.

Pearls and Pitfalls With Intramedullary Nailing of Proximal Tibia Fractures

Intramedullary fixation of proximal tibia fractures remains a challenging surgical technique, with malalignment reported as high as 84%. The pull from the extensor mechanism, the hamstring and iliotibial band, in addition to the lack of endosteal fit from the nail, has made surgical fixation of these fractures difficult. Commonly held principles to reduce angular deformity include ensuring adequate imaging, obtaining an optimal start and trajectory for the implant, and obtaining and maintaining a reduction throughout the duration of the procedure. Some adjunctive techniques to assist in the application of these principles include use of a semiextended technique, clamping, blocking screws/wires, and unicortical plates. Understanding the challenges involved in intramedullary nailing of proximal tibia fractures and considering a wide array of techniques in the orthopaedic surgeon's armamentarium to combat these challenges is important.

Suprapatellar Tibial Nailing

The suprapatellar nailing technique is an important adjunct in the armamentarium of an orthopedic surgeon. Although a variety of new instrumentations are required for insertion of the suprapatellar nail, most companies now carry these instruments. Easier positioning, maintenance of reduction, ease of intraoperative fluoroscopy, more anatomic starting trajectory, decreased malreduction rates, and possible decrease in anterior knee pain are all benefits of suprapatellar nailing, thus making mastery of this technique essential for an orthopedic surgeon.

Distal Nail Target and Alignment of Distal Tibia Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relationship between the distal nail target and postoperative alignment for distal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A single level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

One hundred thirty distal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing over a 10-year period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Malalignment >5 degrees.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight cases (29.2%) of malalignment >5 degrees included valgus (19 cases, 14.6%), procurvatum (13 cases, 10.0%), recurvatum (1 case, 0.8%), and combined valgus with procurvatum (5 cases, 3.8%). Medially directed nails demonstrated relative valgus (mean lateral distal tibia angle 86.4 vs. 89.4 degrees, P < 0.01) and more frequent coronal malalignment (24 of 78, 30.8% vs. 0 of 52, 0%, P < 0.01). Anteriorly directed nails demonstrated relative procurvatum (mean anterior distal tibia angle 82.8 vs. 80.9 degrees, P < 0.01) and more frequent sagittal malalignment (15 of 78, 19.2% vs. 3 of 52, 5.8%, P = 0.03). Malalignment was less common for nails targeting the central or slightly posterolateral plafond (0 of 30, 0% vs. 38 of 100, 38%), P < 0.01. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the distal nail target (P = 0.03), fracture within 5 cm of the plafond (P = 0.01), as well as night and weekend surgery (P = 0.03) were all independently associated with malalignment.

CONCLUSIONS

Alignment of distal tibia fractures is sensitive to both injury and treatment factors. Nails should be targeted centrally or slightly posterolaterally to minimize malalignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intra-medullary nail insertion accuracy: A comparison of the infra-patellar and supra-patellar approach

AIMS

The anatomical safe zone for intra-medullary nail insertion through the tibial plateau is small, insertion outside of this area risks damage to intra-articular structures and poor fracture reduction. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine if the new supra-patella (SP) approach confers improved nail insertion accuracy, when compared with the standard infra-patella (IP) technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred cases were included in the study (SP 95, IP 105). Insertion accuracy was assessed on AP and lateral radiographic imaging, and measured as the distances between the central axis of the proximal nail and the ideal entry point.

RESULTS

The median distance from the ideal entry point was 4.4 mm (SP) and 5.1 mm (IP) (p = 0.046) in the coronal plane, and 4.0 mm (SP) and 3.7 mm (IP) (p = 0.527) in the sagittal plane. A narrower range in measurements was observed in the SP technique in both sagittal and coronal planes, 17.8 mm vs 28.6 mm, and 19.7 mm vs 30.3 mm respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found that the SP technique achieved significantly improved nail insertion accuracy in the coronal plane. Insertion accuracy was equivocal between the two techniques in the sagittal plane. A narrower range in entry points was observed in the SP cohort in both planes suggesting improved control in nail insertion using this technique.

Ultrasonographic comparison of bilateral patellar tendon dimensions in patients treated via intramedullary tibial nailing using a transpatellar approach

Objective

One of the most common complications following intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture is anterior knee pain. The etiology of pain remains unclear. Patellar tendon entry point is the most suspected reason for anterior knee pain. This study, sonographically examined the patellar tendons of patients treated via intramedullary nailing.

Methods

Thirty-two patients with a tibial shaft fracture requiring intramedullary nailing via a transpatellar approach were included in the study. After all patients were grouped by reference to the presence of anterior knee pain, bilateral patellar tendon ultrasonography was performed.

Results

Thirty-two patients were included in the study. Patients were measured postop average in 38.3 months (10th months - 84th months). It was determined that 10 patients of total 32 (31.3%) had anterior knee pain. There were no statistically differences between study groups in the length of patellar tendon. In the painless group; patellar tendon was wider and thicker in the operated side than the non operated side. The mean differences in the thickness between operated side versus non – operated side of the painless group were 5.3 ± 1.8 in the operated side and 3.9 ± 1.4 in the non – operated side (p = 0.007 < 0.05). The corresponding values for width of the patellar tendon was 29.6 ± 3.3 in the operated side and 27.6 ± 3.8 in the non – operated side (p = 0.007 ˂ 0.05). As a result, there were no statistically significant differences between width and thickness of the patellar tendons in the painful group, on the contrary, in the painless group; patellar tendons were wider and thicker in the operated side than those in the non - operated side. Mean values for thickness of the operated and non-operated side were 5.9 ± 2.3 and 4.2 ± 2.0, respectively (p = 0.059 > 0.05). Mean values for width of the operated and non-operated side were 30.2 ± 4.5 and 28.5 ± 4.0, respectively (p = 0.103 > 0,05).

Conclusion

Based on the ultrasonographic investigation of their patellar tendons after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture, in the painless patients group; the patellar tendon was wider and thicker in the operated side than the non – operated side, however, in the painful patients there were no statistically significant differences between this parameters. Although the number of patients was not sufficient to conclude precise relation between patellar tendon entry point and anterior knee pain, we determined that thicker and wider tendon might be less related to anterior knee pain.

Level of evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Anterior intermeniscal ligament: frequency in MRI studies and spatial relationship to the entry point for intramedullary tibial nailing related to the risk of iatrogenic violation

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain is the most common complication after intramedullary tibial nailing. Often, the cause is multifactorial and individually different. Violation of the anterior intermeniscal ligament (AIL) during intramedullary tibial nailing might be a possible origin of postsurgical anterior knee pain. Both the importance and function of the AIL remain somewhat ambivalent, and even the figures quoted in the literature for its existence in the population vary drastically. Our aim was to verify the estimated frequency of the AIL in the literature by retrospectively analysing the data of MRI studies conducted at our hospital. In addition, we attempted to assess the potential risk of AIL violation during intramedullary tibial nailing, based on the spatial arrangement.

METHODS

Two independent examiners analysed the images generated in 351 MRI studies conducted at our hospital between June 2013 and May 2014. All cases who did not reveal any previous knee-joint injury or osteoarthritis of the knee were allocated to group I. All other cases were included in group II. To estimate the potential risk of AIL injury during the nailing procedure, the distance between the AIL and the theoretical entry point for intramedullary nailing was measured.

RESULTS

We identified the AIL on the images of nearly all patients (96.5%) in group I. In group II, the presence of the AIL was confirmed in only 51.4% of cases (p < 0.001). The average distance between the AIL and theoretical entry point for intramedullary tibial nailing was 10.1 mm (range 3.48-18.88 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Because we were able to confirm the presence of the AIL in nearly all patients without a history of knee joint injuries or osteoarthrosis, we presume that the AIL may play a role in knee joint function. Violation of the AIL during intramedullary nailing appears likely due to the close position of the AIL in relation to the entry point for the inserted nail. As a result and due to its rich sensory innervation, a connection between AIL violation during tibial nailing and postoperative onset of anterior knee pain seems likely. To eliminate one risk factor of anterior knee pain development and in view of the unresolved issues of AIL function, violation of the ligament during any operative procedure should be avoided.

What Is the Ideal Starting Point for an Olecranon Screw? An Anatomic Cadaveric Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether "center-center" position is ideal starting point for minimum fracture displacement when placing an intramedullary (IM) screw in the ulna.

METHODS

Thirty-six arms (average age, 82 years) underwent a posterior approach to the olecranon and were randomized into 3 groups: center-center (center in sagittal plane, center in coronal plane), posterior-lateral (posterior in sagittal plane, lateral in coronal plane), and posterior-medial (posterior in sagittal plane, medial in coronal plane). Groups were matched into 18 pairs, and fixation was performed with an IM screw. Primary outcome measure was articular surface displacement on the olecranon. Measurements were compared across each combination of locations using the Kruskal-Wallis rank sums test, and a sign test determined whether each location differed from anatomic reduction.

RESULTS

Articular step-off measurements were significantly different between center-center (0.6 mm) and posterior-medial (2.1 mm) groups (P = 0.01) and approached significance with posterior-lateral versus posterior-medial (0.9 mm) locations (P = 0.07). No significant difference was found comparing center-center with posterior-lateral locations (P = 0.7). The articular surface (P = 0.04), posterior cortex (P = 0.02), and medial cortex (P = 0.001) measurements for the posterior-medial starting point were all worse compared with anatomic reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Malreduction of a simulated olecranon fracture was most significant when the starting point for the IM screw was malpositioned medially. A central or laterally based starting point was more forgiving. Avoiding a medially based starting point is crucial for achieving benefits of fixation with an IM screw and reduces the chance of malreduction after fixation.

Infrapatellar vs. suprapatellar approach to obtain an optimal insertion angle for intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures

BACKGROUND

During intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures, the insertion angle of the nail is of great importance. When the nail impacts the posterior cortex due to a large insertion angle with a dorsal target course, higher insertion forces are needed, and the danger of iatrogenic fractures increases. Accordingly, the insertion direction should be as parallel as possible to the longitudinal axis of the tibia. We aimed to confirm the hypothesis that intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures can be performed with smaller insertion angles via a suprapatellar approach rather than infrapatellar approach.

METHODS

In 19 human bodies of donors with intact tibiae, we performed intramedullary nailing by both a suprapatellar and an infrapatellar approach. The correct entry point was determined by fluoroscopy. Subsequently, the medullary canal was reamed up to a diameter of 10 mm, and a 9 mm polytetrafluorethylen tube was inserted instead of a tibia nail. The angle between the proximal aspect of the tube and the longitudinal axis of the tibia was measured using a computer-assisted surgery system.

RESULTS

The angle between the proximal aspect of the inserted tube, simulating the tibial nail, and the longitudinal tibial axis was significantly larger when using the infrapatellar approach.

CONCLUSIONS

We achieved an insertion angle significantly more parallel to the longitudinal axis when using a suprapatellar approach for intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. Thereby, both the risk of iatrogenic fracture of the posterior cortex and apex anterior angulation of the short proximal fragment can be reduced during intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures.

Comparison of Tibial Intramedullary Nailing Guided by Digital Technology Versus Conventional Method: A Prospective Study

Background

This prospective study aimed to compare clinical effects of intramedullary nailing guided by digital and conventional technologies in treatment of tibial fractures.

Material/Methods

Thirty-two patients (mean age 43 years, 18 males and 14 females) who were treated for tibial fractures from October 2010 to October 2012 were enrolled. They were sequentially randomized to receive intramedullary nailing guided by either digital technology (digital group, n=16) or conventional technology (conventional group, n=16). The operation time, fluoroscopy times, fracture healing time, distance between the actual and planned insertion point, postoperative lower limb alignment, and functional recovery were recorded for all patients.

Results

The mean operation time in the digital group was 43.1±6.2 min compared with 48.7±8.3 min for the conventional technology (P=0.039). The fluoroscopy times and distance between the actual and planned insertion point were significantly lower in the digital group than in the conventional group (both P<0.001). The accuracy rate of the insertion point was 99.12% by digital technology. No difference was found in fracture healing time and good postoperative lower limb alignment between the digital and conventional groups (P=0.083 and P=0.310), as well as the effective rate (100% vs. 87.50%, P=0.144).

Conclusions

Intramedullary nailing guided by digital technology has many advantages in treatment of tibial fractures compared to conventional technology, including shorter operation time, reduced fluoroscopy times, and decreased distance between the actual and planned insertion point of the intramedullary nail.

Semiextended approach for intramedullary nailing via a patellar eversion technique for tibial-shaft fractures: Evaluation of the patellofemoral joint

Intramedullary nail fixation is a common treatment for tibial-shaft fractures, and it offers a better functional prognosis than other conservative treatments. Currently, the primary approach employed during intramedullary nail insertion is the semiextended position is the suprapatellar approach, which involves a vertical incision of the quadriceps tendon Damage to the patellofemoral joint cartilage has been highlighted as a drawback associated with this approach. To avoid this issue, we perform surgery using the patellar eversion technique and a soft sleeve. This method allows the articular surface to be monitored during intramedullary nail insertion. We arthroscopically assessed the effect of this technique on patellofemoral joint cartilage. The patellar eversion technique allows a direct view and protection of the patellofemoral joint without affecting the patella. Thus, damage to the patellofemoral joint cartilage can be avoided.

Anterior Knee Pain after Tibial Intra-medullary Nailing: Is it Predictable?

Introduction: Intramedullary nailing has been used frequently for the treatment of tibial diaphyseal fractures. Chronic anterior knee pain has been considered the most frequent post-operative complication of this technique. We investigated the relationship between anterior knee pain and position of nail tip in proximal tibia.

Methods: 103 patients were selected among patients who underwent interlocking nailing in our institution. Patients with other factors that might cause anterior knee pain were excluded. In all patients intramedullary nailing was done using transpatellar approach. The patients were evaluated in two groups, 42 patients had anterior knee pain (Grup A), whereas 61 patients did not have pain (Group B). The distance from nail tip from tibial plateau was measured on lateral radiographs. Nail prominence from anterior tibial cortex was also measured.

Results: The two groups were similar with respect to gender and follow up period. Out of 42 patients who had knee pain 21 (50%) had nail tip within proximal third distance from plateau to tibial tuberosity. Twenty-four patients (42%) among knee pain group had nail prominence of more than 5mm from anterior tibial cortex followed by 12 patients (29%) within 5mm and 12 patients (29%) nail tip buried within the anterior cortex.

Conclusion: A greater incidence of knee pain was found when nail was prominent more than 5mm and when it is in the proximal third distance from tibial plateau to tuberosity. Patients should be aware of high incidence of knee pain when the nail tip is placed in proximal third and prominence of more than 5mm.

Suprapatellar nailing of tibial fractures-Indications and technique

Intramedullary nailing is the standard procedure for surgical treatment of closed and Gustilo-Anderson Grade I-II° open fractures of the tibial shaft. The use of intramedullary nailing for the treatment of proximal metaphyseal tibia fractures is frequently followed by postoperative malalignment, whereas plate osteosynthesis is associated with higher rates of postoperative infection. Intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures is generally performed through an infrapatellar approach. The injured extremity must be positioned at a minimum of 90° of flexion in the knee joint to achieve optimal exposure of the correct entry point. The tension of the quadriceps tendon causes a typical apex anterior angulation of the proximal fragment. The suprapatellar approach improves reduction of the fracture and reduces the occurrence of malalignment during intramedullary nailing of extra-articular proximal tibial fractures. The knee is positioned in 20° of flexion to neutralise traction forces secondary to the quadriceps muscle, thus preventing an apex anterior angulation of the proximal fragment. An additional advantage of the technique is that it allows the surgeon to avoid or minimise further soft tissue damage because of the distance between the optimal incision point and the usual area of soft tissue damage.

Safe surgical technique: intramedullary nail fixation of tibial shaft fractures

Statically locked, reamed intramedullary nailing remains the standard treatment for displaced tibial shaft fractures. Establishing an appropriate starting point is a crucial part of the surgical procedure. Recently, suprapatellar nailing in the semi-extended position has been suggested as a safe and effective surgical technique. Numerous reduction techiques are available to achieve an anatomic fracture alignment and the treating surgeon should be familiar with these maneuvers. Open reduction techniques should be considered if anatomic fracture alignment cannot be achieved by closed means. Favorable union rates above 90 % can be achieved by both reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing. Despite favorable union rates, patients continue to have functional long-term impairments. In particular, anterior knee pain remains a common complaint following intramedullary tibial nailing. Malrotation remains a commonly reported complication after tibial nailing. The effect of postoperative tibial malalignment on the clinical and radiographic outcome requires further investigation.

Advances in Intramedullary Nailing: Suprapatellar Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures in the Semiextended Position

Reamed locked intramedullary nailing remains the standard treatment for displaced tibial shaft fractures. Supra-patellar tibial nailing in the semiextended position has been suggested as a safe and effective surgical technique that allows mitigating certain challenges of the standard subpatellar approach. Suprapatellar nailing seems to facilitate achieving and maintaining fracture reduction, particularly in proximal third tibia fractures. Preliminary investigations have suggested that this technique is associated with a low rate of complications, including a reduced incidence of postoperative anterior knee pain. Further clinical investigations are necessary to establish overall complication rates and long-term subjective outcomes.

Intramedullary Tibial Nailing Reduces the Attachment Area and Ultimate Load of the Anterior Medial Meniscal Root: A Potential Explanation for Anterior Knee Pain in Female Patients and Smaller Patients

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary (IM) nailing is the treatment of choice among orthopaedic surgeons for tibial shaft fractures. However, because of the close proximity of the nail's insertion site to the anterior medial (AM) meniscal root on the tibial plateau, there is increased risk of iatrogenic injury to the meniscal root during nailing.

PURPOSE

To quantify the area of the AM meniscal root footprint damaged by IM tibial reaming and determine its subsequent effects on the ultimate failure load in female versus male knees.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twelve matched pairs (6 male and 6 female pairs; average age, 50.2 years) of human cadaveric knees were randomly assigned to native and reamed groups. In the reamed group, knees were reamed within the "safe zone" according to current guidelines for IM tibial nail insertion (3 mm lateral to the center of the tibial tubercle and adjacent to the anterior margin of the tibial plateau). The attachment areas and ultimate failure load were quantified and compared with paired knees in the native group.

RESULTS

Intra-articular reaming within the "safe zone" for IM tibial nail insertion did not significantly decrease the AM root attachment area or ultimate failure load in male specimens, as only 2 of the 6 knees were damaged by reaming. In contrast, all 6 of the AM roots in the female knees were damaged by reaming, and on average, reaming decreased the female AM root attachment area by 19% and significantly decreased ultimate failure load by 37% (P = .028). There was a strong negative correlation (R(2) = 0.77) between reamed tunnel-AM root overlap area and medial-lateral width in female but not in male knees.

CONCLUSION

Standard reaming for an IM tibial nail induced significant damage to the AM meniscal root in smaller, female specimens, whereas larger, male specimens were not affected.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings may suggest that improvements in current guidelines and surgical techniques are warranted to prevent iatrogenic injury to the AM meniscal root during intramedullary reaming for tibial shaft fractures in females and in smaller patients.

[Suprapatellar approach to tibial medullary nailing with electromagnetic field-guided distal locking]

Closed tibial shaft fractures are the domain of intramedullary nailing. With the introduction of new nail designs and technologies, even small, dislocated distal fragments can be anatomically aligned and safely fixed. Unsolved or to a lesser degree controlled are the problems of distal locking in the freehand technique, which can still be difficult and can lead to a significant radiation exposure, and how to control very short proximal tibial fragments in metaphyseal tibial fractures or tibial segmental fractures, where the proximal fracture line also runs through the metaphysis.By using a suprapatellar approach, i.e. a skin incision proximal to the patella with an entry point into the tibial bone from within the knee at the same site as for a standard infrapatellar approach, and then nailing the tibia in a semi-extended position, i.e. the knee is only flexed 10-20°, the intraoperative dislocation of a short proximal fragment can be avoided. The main indications for semi-extended tibial nailing are a short diaphyseal fragment in an isolated tibial shaft fracture, a segmental fracture where the proximal fracture line is metaphyseal and in patients where infrapatellar soft tissues are compromised.The use of the electromagnetic guidance system SureShot® generates reliable and reproducible results, reduces the operating time and is independent from radiation for distal locking.

Anterior meniscus root avulsion following intramedullary nailing for a tibial shaft fracture

This paper presents the first reported case of iatrogenic injury to the anterior medial meniscal root attachment following intramedullary nailing for a tibial shaft fracture. The patient experienced a closed right tibia-fibula fracture 7 years prior to presentation, which was treated with a reamed intramedullary nail. The nail was removed 3 years after the index surgery due to chronic anterior knee pain, which persisted following hardware removal. At presentation, the patient was diagnosed with an anterior horn medial meniscal root tear likely secondary to insertion of the intramedullary nail through the anatomic footprint of the anterior medial root. After undergoing a medial meniscus anterior horn root repair, the patient was asymptomatic and resumed normal activities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case report, Level IV.

Is there a bone-nail specific entry point? Automated fit quantification of tibial nail designs during the insertion for six different nail entry points

Intramedullary nailing is the standard fixation method for displaced diaphyseal fractures of tibia. Selection of the correct nail insertion point is important for axial alignment of bone fragments and to avoid iatrogenic fractures. However, the standard entry point (SEP) may not always optimise the bone-nail fit due to geometric variations of bones. This study aimed to investigate the optimal entry for a given bone-nail pair using the fit quantification software tool previously developed by the authors. The misfit was quantified for 20 bones with two nail designs (ETN and ETN-Proximal Bend) related to the SEP and 5 entry points which were 5 mm and 10 mm away from the SEP. The SEP was the optimal entry point for 50% of the bones used. For the remaining bones, the optimal entry point was located 5 mm away from the SEP, which improved the overall fit by 40% on average. However, entry points 10 mm away from the SEP doubled the misfit. The optimised bone-nail fit can be achieved through the SEP and within the range of a 5 mm radius, except posteriorly. The study results suggest that the optimal entry point should be selected by considering the fit during insertion and not only at the final position.

Radiographic identification of the anterior and posterior root attachments of the medial and lateral menisci

BACKGROUND

Anatomic root placement is necessary to restore native meniscal function during meniscal root repair. Radiographic guidelines for anatomic root placement are essential to improve the accuracy and consistency of anatomic root repair and to optimize outcomes after surgery.

PURPOSE

To define quantitative radiographic guidelines for identification of the anterior and posterior root attachments of the medial and lateral menisci on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographic views.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

The anterior and posterior roots of the medial and lateral menisci were identified in 12 human cadaveric specimens (average age, 51.3 years; age range, 39-65 years) and labeled using 2-mm radiopaque spheres. True AP and lateral radiographs were obtained, and 2 raters independently measured blinded radiographs in relation to pertinent landmarks and radiographic reference lines.

RESULTS

On AP radiographs, the anteromedial and posteromedial roots were, on average, 31.9 ± 5.0 mm and 36.3 ± 3.5 mm lateral to the edge of the medial tibial plateau, respectively. The anterolateral and posterolateral roots were, on average, 37.9 ± 5.2 mm and 39.3 ± 3.8 mm medial to the edge of the lateral tibial plateau, respectively. On lateral radiographs, the anteromedial and anterolateral roots were, on average, 4.8 ± 3.7 mm and 20.5 ± 4.3 mm posterior to the anterior margin of the tibial plateau, respectively. The posteromedial and posterolateral roots were, on average, 18.0 ± 2.8 mm and 19.8 ± 3.5 mm anterior to the posterior margin of the tibial plateau, respectively. The intrarater and interrater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were >0.958, demonstrating excellent reliability.

CONCLUSION

The meniscal root attachment sites were quantitatively and reproducibly defined with respect to anatomic landmarks and superimposed radiographic reference lines. The high ICCs indicate that the measured radiographic relationships are a consistent means for evaluating meniscal root positions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study demonstrated consistent and reproducible radiographic guidelines for the location of the meniscal roots. These measurements may be used to assess root positions on intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative radiographs.

Controversies in the intramedullary nailing of proximal and distal tibia fractures

Management of tibia fractures by internal fixation, particularly intramedullary nails, has become the standard for diaphyseal fractures. However, for metaphyseal fractures or those at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction, choice of fixation device and technique is controversial. For distal tibia fractures, nailing and plating techniques may be used, the primary goal of each being to achieve acceptable alignment with minimal complications. Different techniques for reduction of these fractures are available and can be applied with either fixation device. Overall outcomes appear to be nearly equivalent, with minor differences in complications. Proximal tibia fractures can be fixed using nailing, which is associated with deformity of the proximal short segment. A newer technique-suprapatellar nailing-may minimize these problems, and use of this method has been increasing in trauma centers. However, most of the data are still largely based on case series.

Radiologic outcome and patient-reported function after intramedullary nailing: a comparison of the retropatellar and infrapatellar approach

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the patient-reported functional outcomes after intramedullary nailing of the tibia through a retropatellar or infrapatellar approach. Radiographic assessment of nail entry point and accuracy of fracture reduction were included to aid in the identification of variables that may explain any difference in patient-reported outcomes.

DESIGN

A retrospective radiographic and questionnaire-based assessment of patient-reported outcomes and complications after tibial nailing for trauma or limb reconstruction through a retropatellar or infrapatellar approach.

SETTING

Regional limb reconstruction unit within a university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Two consecutive series of 38 patients with intramedullary tibial nails inserted through a retropatellar approach, and 36 patients with a tibial nail inserted through an infrapatellar approach.

INTERVENTION

Tibial nail insertion through either a retropatellar or infrapatellar approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient-reported outcomes and complication rates and radiographic assessment of fracture reduction and nail insertion entry point.

RESULTS

No significant difference was seen in Kujala score as a measure of anterior knee pain (P = 0.217), either in the physical (P = 0.372) or mental (0.504) components of the SF-12 between the groups, although there was a trend toward symptomatic intrusive knee pain in the infrapatellar group. A more accurate fracture reduction, both in terms of angulation (P = 0.003) and translation (P = 0.010) in the coronal plane, was seen in the retropatellar group. The entry point for nail insertion was more accurate in both the sagittal (P = 0.011) and coronal (P = 0.014) planes.

CONCLUSIONS

Retropatellar tibial nail insertion is not associated with more anterior knee pain when compared with infrapatellar nail insertion but is associated with more accurate nail insertion and fracture reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Techniques for intramedullary nailing of proximal tibia fractures

Despite poor early results with intramedullary nailing of extra-articular proximal tibia fractures, improvements in surgical technique and implant design modifications have resulted in more acceptable outcomes. However, prevention of the commonly encountered apex anterior and/or valgus deformities remains a challenge when treating these injuries. It is necessary for the surgeon to recognize this and know how to neutralize these forces. Surgeons should be comfortable using a variety of the reduction techniques presented to minimize fracture malalignment.

Freehand 'figure 4' technique for tibial intramedullary nailing: introduction of technique and review of 87 cases

Intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures is commonplace, and freehand operative techniques are increasingly popular. The standard freehand method has the knee of the injured leg flexed over a radiolucent bolster. This requires the theatre fluoroscope to swing from antero-posterior to lateral position several times. Furthermore, guide wire placement, reaming and nail insertion are all performed well above most surgeons' shoulder height. Alternatively the leg is hung over the edge of the table, and the assistant must crouch and hold the leg until the nail is passed beyond the fracture. We describe a freehand figure 4 position technique for tibial nailing which is easier both for the surgeons and the radiographer, and present a series of 87 consecutive cases utilising this method.

Influence of knee flexion and atraumatic mobilisation of infrapatellar fat pad on incidence and severity of anterior knee pain after tibial nailing

We evaluated the incidence and aetiology of anterior knee pain (AKP) in a series of patients that underwent intramedullary nailing for stabilisation of tibial fractures. During the preparation of the entry site no excision of the infrapatellar fat was allowed and electrical haemostasis was kept at the lowest level. Medullary canal was reamed and the nails inserted in position of knee flexion over 100 degrees. All fractures were fixed using medial paratendinous approach. Functional outcome was measured using Lysholm knee score. The knee range of movement and return to previous level of activity were also documented and analysed. Mean follow up was 38.9 months (range 12-84 months). In total 60 patients with 62 tibial shaft fractures were analysed. The mean age at the time of final follow up was 49.4 years (range 20-87). In 22 (35.5%) a newly developed and persisting pain in the anterior region of the operated knee was reported. According to VAP scale, the pain was mild (VAS 1-3) in 12 cases (19.4%) and moderate (VAS 4-6) in 10 (16.1%). In 16 cases (73%) the pain was noticed 6-12 months after injury and subjectively related to return to full range of working and recreational activities. The mean Lysholm knee score in the group without AKP was 90.8. In the AKP group with mild pain it was 88.4 and in the group with moderate AKP it was 79.9. Complete return to previous professional and recreational activities occurred in 49/60 patients (81.7%). Content with the treatment regarding expectations in recovery dynamics and return to desired level of activity was present in 98.3% of patients; one patient was unsatisfied with the treatment. Our results indicate that respecting the physiological motion of Hoffa pad and menisci during knee flexion, accompanied with atraumatic mobilisation of retrotendinous fat, reduces incidence and severity of anterior knee pain following intramedullary fixation of tibial shaft fractures.