Extra-articular Unstable Iliac Fractures: Associated Injuries, Fixation Strategies, and Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the associated injuries, fixation constructs, and outcomes of extra-articular unstable iliac fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS

Thirty-three extra-articular unstable iliac fractures treated over a 20-year period.

INTERVENTION

Percutaneous or open fixation of iliac fractures at the pelvic brim AND/OR iliac crest.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of union, fixation failure, and angiography at the time of injury.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were treated operatively with appropriate follow-up. Four patients had fixation failure with displacement, all in the group with only brim OR crest fixation (4/8 patients, 50% rate). In patients with both crest AND brim fixation (n = 17), there were no cases of implant failure or late displacement. In displaced fractures (n = 22), 4 patients (18%) required embolization by interventional radiology. In all 4 cases, the superior gluteal artery was embolized. In patients with both crest AND brim fixation, all went on to uneventful union with an average Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score of 0.9 (range, 0-5) at final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Extra-articular unstable iliac fractures are high-energy injuries that demonstrate a high rate of union when both pelvic brim AND iliac crest fixation is used. Approximately 1 in 5 patients with a displaced iliac fracture presented with a superior gluteal artery disruption requiring embolization. Pelvic brim OR iliac crest fixation used in isolation was associated with a fixation failure rate of 50%, supporting previous biomechanical work.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Association Between 6-Week Postdischarge Risk Classification and 12-Month Outcomes After Orthopedic Trauma

Importance

Numerous studies have demonstrated that long-term outcomes after orthopedic trauma are associated with psychosocial and behavioral health factors evident early in the patient's recovery. Little is known about how to identify clinically actionable subgroups within this population.

Objectives

To examine whether risk and protective factors measured at 6 weeks after injury could classify individuals into risk clusters and evaluate whether these clusters explain variations in 12-month outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A prospective observational study was conducted between July 16, 2013, and January 15, 2016, among 352 patients with severe orthopedic injuries at 6 US level I trauma centers. Statistical analysis was conducted from October 9, 2017, to July 13, 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

At 6 weeks after discharge, patients completed standardized measures for 5 risk factors (pain intensity, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, alcohol abuse, and tobacco use) and 4 protective factors (resilience, social support, self-efficacy for return to usual activity, and self-efficacy for managing the financial demands of recovery). Latent class analysis was used to classify participants into clusters, which were evaluated against measures of function, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and self-rated health collected at 12 months.

Results

Among the 352 patients (121 women and 231 men; mean [SD] age, 37.6 [12.5] years), latent class analysis identified 6 distinct patient clusters as the optimal solution. For clinical use, these clusters can be collapsed into 4 groups, sorted from low risk and high protection (best) to high risk and low protection (worst). All outcomes worsened across the 4 clinical groupings. Bayesian analysis shows that the mean Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment dysfunction scores at 12 months differed by 7.8 points (95% CI, 3.0-12.6) between the best and second groups, by 10.3 points (95% CI, 1.6-20.2) between the second and third groups, and by 18.4 points (95% CI, 7.7-28.0) between the third and worst groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study demonstrates that during early recovery, patients with orthopedic trauma can be classified into risk and protective clusters that account for a substantial amount of the variance in 12-month functional and health outcomes. Early screening and classification may allow a personalized approach to postsurgical care that conserves resources and targets appropriate levels of care to more patients.

Operative intervention for geriatric hip fracture: does type of surgery affect hospital length of stay?

Hip fractures are the most costly fall-related fractures. Differences in hospital length of stay (LOS) based on type of surgery could have major financial implications in a potential bundled payment system in which all hip fractures are reimbursed a standard amount. We conducted a study to analyze differences in hospital LOS and costs for total hip arthroplasty (THA), hemiarthroplasty (HA), cephalomedullary nailing, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). Through retrospective chart review, 615 patients over age 60 years across a 9-year period at an urban level I trauma center were identified. Mean LOS and costs for hip fracture repair were 6.91 days and $30,011.25, respectively. HA/THA was associated with the longest mean LOS (7.43 days) and highest costs ($33,657.90). After several patient factors were adjusted for, ORIF was associated with 0.84 fewer in-patient days and $3805.20 less in hospitalization costs compared with HA/THA (P=.042). CRPP was associated with 1.63 fewer days and $7383.90 less in costs than HA/THA (P=.0076). Our results provide insight into the financial implications of hip fracture fixation and identify targets for quality improvement initiatives to improve efficiency of resource utilization.

Radiographs are not useful in detecting arthroscopically confirmed mild chondral damage

Preoperatively predicting chondral damage is important. Weightbearing radiographs, including the standing anteroposterior and 45 degrees flexion posteroanterior views traditionally have been used for this purpose. We wanted to determine if one radiograph had superior sensitivity or specificity in detecting arthroscopically confirmed Grade II chondromalacia (mild arthritis). A standard prospective standing radiographic protocol was designed for all patients who presented to a sports medicine center with knee complaints. Patients who had subsequent arthroscopic surgery had their radiographs measured in a blinded manner for articular cartilage intervals in millimeters to detect joint-space narrowing. Intraarticular chondral damage was correlated with the radiographic findings. Three hundred forty-nine of a possible 411 (87%) patients during a 2-year period had both radiographs and subsequent arthroscopic grading of chondromalacia. This has been the largest study that correlated arthroscopic chondromalacia grades with two commonly preferred weightbearing radiograph projections. Despite specificities greater than 90%, the sensitivity was extremely low and neither standing radiograph was superior. Neither radiograph was useful in detecting Grade II chondral damage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level I-1 (testing of previously developed diagnostic criteria in series of consecutive patients--with universally applied reference "gold" standard). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Evaluation of neck pain, radiculopathy, and myelopathy: imaging, conservative treatment, and surgical indications

Neck pain is a common complaint that typically represents a spectrum of disorders affecting the cervical spine. The clinical history and examination of patients with neck pain dictate the proper timing and selection of diagnostic studies such as plain radiography, MRI, and myelography with CT. Most neck pain is self-limiting and will resolve with appropriate conservative care. Nonsurgical treatment is the most appropriate first step in almost all cases of cervical radiculopathy. In contrast, the conservative care of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with measures such as physical therapy, spinal manipulation, medications, collars, and traction is limited.