De novo food allergy after intestinal transplantation: a report of three cases

Transplant-acquired food allergy: current perspectives

Mechanisms that regulate the tolerance to dietary proteins or the loss of this and subsequent development of disease are poorly understood. In food allergy, there is growing awareness of the urgency in understanding these events to aid in the development of next-generation therapies and interventions. This review focuses on the accumulating evidence related to food allergy that develops after transplantation. This intriguing immunological phenomenon has been described in several different types of transplant settings and to variety of different foods. We outline these studies and the evidence from them that support transplant-acquired food allergy being a process regulated by both the donor allergic status and the recipient genetics and treatments. A number of key risk factors seem prevalent throughout transplant-acquired food allergy and include type of transplant, age and general health of the recipient, modality of immunosuppression and potentially the genetics of both donor and recipient. Importantly, these studies provide a window into better general understanding of food allergy, and facilitate clearer understanding of the critical immunological and epidemiological factors needed to allow the adoptive transfer of a food-specific allergic disease from one individual to another.

Fish allergy: in review

Globally, the rising consumption of fish and its derivatives, due to its nutritional value and divergence of international cuisines, has led to an increase in reports of adverse reactions to fish. Reactions to fish are not only mediated by the immune system causing allergies, but are often caused by various toxins and parasites including ciguatera and Anisakis. Allergic reactions to fish can be serious and life threatening and children usually do not outgrow this type of food allergy. The route of exposure is not only restricted to ingestion but include manual handling and inhalation of cooking vapors in the domestic and occupational environment. Prevalence rates of self-reported fish allergy range from 0.2 to 2.29 % in the general population, but can reach up to 8 % among fish processing workers. Fish allergy seems to vary with geographical eating habits, type of fish processing, and fish species exposure. The major fish allergen characterized is parvalbumin in addition to several less well-known allergens. This contemporary review discusses interesting and new findings in the area of fish allergy including demographics, novel allergens identified, immunological mechanisms of sensitization, and innovative approaches in diagnosing and managing this life-long disease.

Increase in de novo food allergies after pediatric liver transplantation: tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine immunosuppression

Post-TAFA is an uncommon but serious complication of organ transplantation. This study aimed to compare the incidence of FA in CsA and tacrolimus-treated children following OLT and identify risk factors. The medical charts of all patients who underwent OLT at our institution were reviewed. Between 1985 and 2010, 218 OLTs were performed on 188 pediatric recipients, of which 154 were included in the study. Three patients (3%) of the 102 receiving CsA developed FA, compared with nine (17%) in the 52 tacrolimus-treated patients, the latter exceeding general population reported FA prevalence (RR 5.88; 95% CI: 1.66-20.81). All TAFA cases underwent transplantation before the age of three with an incidence of 29% (9/31) in the tacrolimus-treated children in comparison with 7% (3/41) in the CsA group (RR 3.97; 95% CI: 1.17-13.45). Eosinophilia was present in 81% of children receiving tacrolimus compared with 54% in the CsA group (p = 0.002). We observed a statistically significant increase incidence of FA in tacrolimus-treated children following an OLT and those under the age of three are particularly vulnerable. The underlying process is still unknown and probably multifactorial.

New developments in transplant-acquired allergies

Transplant-acquired allergy (TAA) was firstly described as transplant-acquired food allergy (TAFA) after bone marrow transplantations and mostly observed in a transient form. The picture is complicated by numerous case reports of TAFA after the receipt of liver grafts from donors with no documented history of food allergy. The estimated prevalence of TAFA among young children in the literature has been documented in various studies ranging from 6% to 57%. Although TAA is mostly found to be associated with liver transplantation; it has been recently reported to be related with heart, intestinal, lung and even renal transplantations in adults. Previous reviews of published cases of liver TAA misleadingly emphasized the predominance of children and the absence of TAA in cardiac, pulmonary, and renal transplant recipients. In different studies, the male/female ratio is equal. Literature data suggest that children with TAFA typically present within the first year after surgery and are typically allergic to multiple foods. The pathogenesis of TAA is not still completely understood. Most of the studies support the concept that the functioning liver itself, and not only tacrolimus immunosuppression, is one of the main contributors to TAA in these patients. In the light of recent findings, other possible mechanisms can be summarized as following: (1) the recovery of delayed type hypersensitivity; (2) late manifestation of food allergy; (3) intestinal injury as well as inhibition of cellular energy production by tacrolimus; and (4) transfer of food-specific IgE or lymphocytes. Thus, interplay between hematopoietic cells from the transplanted organ and recipient specific factors (e.g., younger age and atopic background) seem to underlie the development of TAA. Most patients will have symptomatic improvement following reduced immunosuppression and an appropriately restricted diet. Nevertheless, some studies suggest that atopic diseases occur in some of pediatric liver transplant recipients, with manifestations including food allergy, eczema, allergic rhinitis, and asthma. More studies would be needed including greater number of patients to determine whether TAA is transient or not in pediatric/adult solid organ recipients.

Intestinal absorption rate in children after small intestinal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Small bowel transplantation has now become a recognized treatment of irreversible, permanent, and subtotal intestinal failure.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess intestinal absorption at the time of weaning from parenteral nutrition in a series of children after intestinal transplantation.

DESIGN

Twenty-four children (age range: 14-115 mo) received intestinal transplantation, together with the liver in 6 children and the colon in 16 children. Parenteral nutrition was slowly tapered while increasing enteral tube feeding. The absorption rate was measured from a 3-d stool balance analysis performed a few days after the child had weaned from parenteral nutrition to exclusive enteral tube feeding. Results were analyzed according to the resting energy expenditure (REE; Schofield formula).

RESULTS

All children were weaned from parenteral nutrition between 31 and 85 d posttransplantation. Median intakes were as follows: energy, 107 kcal · kg(-1) · d(-1) (range: 79-168 kcal · kg(-1) · d(-1)); lipids, 39 kcal · kg(-1) · d(-1) (range: 20-70 kcal · kg(-1) · d(-1)); and nitrogen, 17 kcal · kg(-1) · d(-1) (range: 11-27 kcal · kg(-1) · d(-1)). Median daily stool output was 998 mL/d (range: 220-2025 mL/d). Median absorption rates were 88% (range: 75-96%) for energy, 82% (range: 55-98%) for lipids, and 77% (range: 61-88%) for nitrogen. The ratios for ingested energy to REE and absorbed energy to REE were 2.2 (range: 1.6-3.6) and 1.8 (range: 1.3-3.3), respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate a suboptimal intestinal graft absorption capacity with fat malabsorption, which necessitates energy intakes of at least twice the REE.

Transfer of peanut allergy following lung transplantation: a case report

This case study describes a patient who developed peanut allergy following lung transplantation. A 54-year-old woman underwent bilateral lung transplantation on June 2009 owing to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. She had no history of food allergy before transplantation. The donor, however, was a 20-year-old man who was fatally injured during an automobile accident; he was allergic to peanuts. At 3 months after transplantation, the lung recipient presented with acute dyspnea and urticaria 15 minutes after consuming food containing peanut derivatives. Pre- and posttransplantation recipient blood samples analyzed for the presence of IgE antibodies specific for peanut allergens confirmed that the allergy had been passively transfered as a consequence of transplantation. Food allergy following solid organ transplantation is thought to be rare, mostly occurring in children. Two mechanisms may explain the observations described for the patient reported in this study: de novo development of peanut allergies after transplantation, or passive transfer of peanut allergies from a peanut-sensitized organ donor. This case report documenting pre- and posttransplantation IgE status in a lung transplantation case suggested that the allergic status of organ donors should be thoroughly assessed before transplantation, and potential allergy transfer risks must be discussed with the transplant team and the patient.

Impact of systemic immuno-suppression after solid organ transplantation on allergen-specific responses

INTRODUCTION

  The immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation targets mainly the T- and B-cell-mediated immune response. However, there is evidence that it neither suppresses sensitization nor clinical manifestation of allergic diseases in organ-transplanted patients.

OBJECTIVE

  This study addresses the question whether allergen-specific responses are altered by systemic immunosuppression via negative effects on the T-regulatory cell compartment and a more pronounced suppression on Th1-type T-cell responses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

  Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 65 solid organ-transplanted (kidney, liver, lung) children, adolescents, and young adults and 18 healthy, matched controls were included, and their clinical and sensitization status assessed. Allergen-specific proliferation, intracellular cytokine production, frequency of forkhead box P3 (FOXP3)+ CD3+ CD4+ CD25(high) cells, mRNA expression of IL-10, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and FOXP3 (real-time RT-PCR) of peripheral blood mononuclear cells or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL)-derived cells, and the inhibitory capacity of T-reg cells were investigated.

RESULTS

  Immunosuppression led to a significantly altered regulatory marker profile expressed by enhanced TGF-β mRNA production and a reduced frequency of FOXP3+ CD4+ CD3+ cells in solid organ transplanted individuals. FOXP3 expression in BAL cells of lung-transplanted patients was significantly decreased. Allergen-specific proliferation was not significantly altered despite long-term immunosuppression. However, suppression of allergen-specific responses via the T-regulatory cell fraction was deficient in immunosuppressed individuals.

CONCLUSION

  The results suggest an insufficient control of allergen-specific responses via the Treg-cell compartment under systemic immunosuppression.

Food allergy: transfused and transplanted

The inadvertent transfer of food allergy from an allergic donor to an unsuspecting recipient by transfusion or organ donation is a relatively rare but intriguing event with potentially catastrophic consequences. Additionally, the development of food allergy in the recipient of a transplant from a donor who was not food allergic poses questions about why this occurs, why it is observed more frequently in some situations than others, and the mechanisms that may be involved. In this review, the transfer of food allergy by transfusion, bone marrow transplantation, and the transplantation of different solid organs is explored, and potential mechanisms in addition to the importance of careful monitoring are discussed.

Pediatric food allergy and mucosal tolerance

The gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal immune response is characterized by an intricate balance between host defense and immunoregulation. A principal element of this normal response is acquisition of oral tolerance. Aberrations in oral tolerance induction can lead to food allergy, an increasingly prevalent disorder that causes significant medical and psychosocial stressors for patients and families. At present there is no definitive therapy for food allergy and the mainstays of treatment are allergen avoidance, nutritional support, and ready access to emergency medications. Significant progress toward an active therapy for food allergy has been made with the advent of novel therapies such as oral immunotherapy (OIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), which modulate the GI mucosal immune response with the goal of promoting oral tolerance. In this review, we will examine the mechanisms of oral tolerance induction and its relation to food allergy and explore novel immunotherapeutic strategies for treatment and prevention of food allergy.

Intestinal barrier function: molecular regulation and disease pathogenesis

The intestinal epithelium is a single-cell layer that constitutes the largest and most important barrier against the external environment. It acts as a selectively permeable barrier, permitting the absorption of nutrients, electrolytes, and water while maintaining an effective defense against intraluminal toxins, antigens, and enteric flora. The epithelium maintains its selective barrier function through the formation of complex protein-protein networks that mechanically link adjacent cells and seal the intercellular space. The protein networks connecting epithelial cells form 3 adhesive complexes: desmosomes, adherens junctions, and tight junctions. These complexes consist of transmembrane proteins that interact extracellularly with adjacent cells and intracellularly with adaptor proteins that link to the cytoskeleton. Over the past decade, there has been increasing recognition of an association between disrupted intestinal barrier function and the development of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. In this review we summarize the evolving understanding of the molecular composition and regulation of intestinal barrier function. We discuss the interactions between innate and adaptive immunity and intestinal epithelial barrier function, as well as the effect of exogenous factors on intestinal barrier function. Finally, we summarize clinical and experimental evidence demonstrating intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction as a major factor contributing to the predisposition to inflammatory diseases, including food allergy, inflammatory bowel diseases, and celiac disease.

Nutrition support after intestinal transplantation: how important is enteral feeding?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intestinal transplantation is the alternative treatment in patients with irreversible intestinal failure, who depend on long-term parenteral nutrition. Nutrition management after intestinal transplantation should contribute to reducing the risk of graft rejection, to improving gut trophicity and should optimize nutrient absorption, the main goal being to achieve full intestinal autonomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Enteral feeding can be administered into the stomach, or directly into the jejunum. Semi-elemental diets are usually used with the aim of improving nutrient absorption and limiting food antigen overload, which might trigger immune stimulation with subsequent increased risk of acute graft rejection. There is no evidence-based reason to use amino acid-based formula. The feeding usually starts with a dilute semi-elemental formula and with a low rate of delivery. The rate and strength of the formula are slowly increased thereafter, according to the individual tolerance. Chylous ascitis and fat malabsorption impair both short-term and long-term nutritional results and are likely to be due to an insufficient reestablishment of the lymphatic circulation of the graft. After an intestinal transplant, patients usually achieve linear growth. However, catch-up growth is rarely observed in stunted patients.

SUMMARY

Nutritional management after intestinal transplantation is challenging and requires a trained, specialized multidisciplinary team.

New-onset post-transplantation food allergy in children--is it attributable only to the immunosuppressive protocol?

New-onset post-transplantation food allergy has been described mainly after liver transplantation, and its pathogenesis was attributed to the immunomodulatory effects of tacrolimus therapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association of food allergy with solid organ transplantation in our center. The medical records of children who underwent kidney transplantation and children who underwent liver or liver and kidney transplantation from 1986 to 2005 were reviewed. A total of 189 children (124 after kidney transplantation, 65 after liver or liver and kidney transplantation) received tacrolimus as part of the immunosuppressive regimen. New-onset post-transplantation food allergy was documented in four of them: two with liver transplants and two with combined kidney and liver transplants. The absence of new-onset food allergy in the children with isolated kidney transplants is compatible with other reports in the literature. This study supports the concept that the functioning liver itself, and not only tacrolimus immunosuppression, is a main contributor to food allergy in this patient population.

Molluscan shellfish allergy

Food allergies affect approximately 3.5-4.0% of the worldwide population. Immediate-type food allergies are mediated by the production of IgE antibodies to specific proteins that occur naturally in allergenic foods. Symptoms are individually variable ranging from mild rashes and hives to life-threatening anaphylactic shock. Seafood allergies are among the most common types of food allergies on a worldwide basis. Allergies to fish and crustacean shellfish are very common. Molluscan shellfish allergies are well known but do not appear to occur as frequently. Molluscan shellfish allergies have been documented to all classes of mollusks including gastropods (e.g., limpet, abalone), bivalves (e.g., clams, oysters, mussels), and cephalopods (e.g., squid, octopus). Tropomyosin, a major muscle protein, is the only well-recognized allergen in molluscan shellfish. The allergens in oyster (Cra g 1), abalone (Hal m 1), and squid (Tod p 1) have been identified as tropomyosin. Cross-reactivity to tropomyosin from other molluscan shellfish species has been observed with sera from patients allergic to oysters, suggesting that individuals with allergies to molluscan shellfish should avoid eating all species of molluscan shellfish. Cross-reactions with the related tropomyosin allergens in crustacean shellfish may also occur but this is less clearly defined. Occupational allergies have also been described in workers exposed to molluscan shellfish products by the respiratory and/or cutaneous routes. With food allergies, one man's food may truly be another man's poison. Individuals with food allergies react adversely to the ingestion of foods and food ingredients that most consumers can safely ingest (Taylor and Hefle, 2001). The allergens that provoke adverse reactions in susceptible individuals are naturally occurring proteins in the specific foods (Bush and Hefle, 1996). Molluscan shellfish, like virtually all foods that contain protein, can provoke allergic reactions in some individuals.

Immunoglobulin E-Mediated Allergies in Lung-Transplanted Adults

BACKGROUND

Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergy has repeatedly been reported after solid organ transplantation, apparently affecting approximately 10% of pediatric organ transplant recipients. Interestingly, type 1 allergy has not been described in transplanted adults, suggesting a particular propensity in childhood.

METHODS

The present cross-sectional study assessed the prevalence of type 1 allergy in 42 adult lung transplant recipients aged 25 to 50 years. Instruments included standardized interviews, skin prick tests, and serum IgE measurements.

RESULTS

Ten of 42 patients (23.8%) displayed elevated specific IgE levels or positive skin prick test results against one or more allergens. Five individuals (11.9%) additionally reported corresponding clinical symptoms of type 1 allergy. No statistically significant association of sensitization or allergy prevalence with patient age, kind of immunosuppressive therapy, and time since transplantation was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The phenomenon of transplantation-associated allergy is not age-restricted and thus should be assessed more thoroughly in all age groups.

Tacrolimus immunosuppression - an association with asymptomatic eosinophilia and elevated total and specific IgE levels

De novo development of food allergy is an infrequent but potentially serious complication of transplantation. An increased prevalence of food allergy noted specifically in children receiving tacrolimus immunosuppression supports the hypothesis that selective suppression of Th1 lymphocytes by the IL-2 inhibitor immunosuppressants CsA, and the more potent drug, tacrolimus , promotes Th2 lymphocytes and an allergic immune response. This study was undertaken to characterize the IgE-mediated immune response, in CsA and tacrolimus-treated, post-OLT children. Thirty children and adolescents aged 1.9-21 yr, mean: 10.6 yr, (6.4 yr post-tx.) were studied. Immunosuppression-CsA: 10 patients, tacrolimus; 20 patients. Blood eosinophils, total IgE levels and specific IgE antibodies (Immulite 2000 Allergy; Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA, USA) to a panel of food and inhaled allergens were measured and correlated with clinical symptoms of allergy. Eosinophilia (>500/mm(3)) range: 599-3125, mean: 1294, was present in 10/20 of patients treated with tacrolimus and 1/10 treated with CsA. IgE levels were elevated in eight of these 10 tacrolimus-treated patients and in two CsA patients ; five were <3 yr of age and IgE levels ranged from 54 to 111 IU/mL (mean: 83), normal for age <45 IU/mL and five were > or =9 yr and IgE levels ranged from 134 to 1606 IU/mL (mean: 557), normal for age <87 IU/mL. Specific IgE levels to a wide panel of food allergens were positive in five tacrolimus-treated patients and to both food and inhaled allergens in three patients (two tacrolimus-treated, one CsA). Four children (tacrolimus-treated) had symptoms of food allergy . None had a family history of allergy. Eosinophilia is present in up to 50% of children and adolescents receiving tacrolimus immunosuppression. The majority of these patients also have elevated levels of total and specific (mainly to food allergens) IgE antibodies. Most patients are asymptomatic and do not manifest food allergy or asthma.

Immunosuppressive therapy does not prevent the occurrence of immunoglobulin E-mediated allergies in children and adolescents with organ transplants

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic organ transplantation has become a common procedure in acute and chronic organ failure. The major limitation, rejection of the allograft by the host's immune system, can be limited by various immunosuppressive drugs that target the adaptive T-cell response. Most of these drugs are used in the treatment of allergic diseases as well, suggesting that transplant recipients under long-term immunosuppressive therapy should not develop any sensitizations or at least not show any clinical signs of allergy. Surprisingly, organ-transplanted children and adults do report symptoms of type 1 allergies, such as allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, bronchial asthma, and food allergies. Thus far, mainly case reports and series on the occurrence of allergy after orthotopic liver transplantation exist.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose with this study was to evaluate in a cross-sectional design the prevalence of immunoglobulin E-mediated sensitizations and type 1 allergies in solid organ-transplanted children and adolescents and to identify risk factors.

METHODS

Seventy-eight organ-transplanted subjects (50 kidney, 9 lung, 19 liver; mean age: 14.06 +/- 5.94 years; range 1.42 to 24.25 years) were studied by standardized interviews (modified International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood [ISAAC] criteria), skin-prick tests, and measurement of specific and total serum immunoglobulin E.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (24.4%) were found to be sensitized to > or = 1 common inhalant or food allergens, as reflected by elevated specific immunoglobulin E levels and/or positive skin-prick test results, and 8 subjects (10.3%) additionally reported a corresponding present history of atopic diseases. No severe anaphylactic reactions were reported. No statistically significant associations with gender, kind of transplanted organ, distinct immunosuppressive therapies, and age at time of transplantation or age at investigation were found (chi2 test, Fisher's exact test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, respectively). Multiple logistic-regression analysis did not identify any independent risk factor either.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that therapeutic immunosuppression does not control sensitizations and clinical manifestation of type 1 allergies in organ-transplanted children and adolescents.