Effect of amlodipine on left ventricular mass in the Amlodipine Cardiovascular Community Trial

Sex- and Gender-Based Pharmacological Response to Drugs

In humans, the combination of all sex-specific genetic, epigenetic, and hormonal influences of biologic sex produces different in vivo environments for male and female cells. We dissect how these influences of sex modify the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of multiple drugs and provide examples for common drugs acting on specific organ systems. We also discuss how gender of physicians and patients may influence the therapeutic response to drugs. We aim to highlight sex as a genetic modifier of the pharmacological response to drugs, which should be considered as a necessary step toward precision medicine that will benefit men and women. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study discusses the influences of biologic sex on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs and provides examples for common drugs acting on specific organ systems. This study also discusses how gender of physicians and patients influence the therapeutic response to drugs.

Thiazide-like/calcium channel blocker agents: a major combination for hypertension management

In recent years, treatment strategies for hypertension have often focused on combination therapies that include diuretics and renin angiotensin aldosterone system blockers such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. However, in clinical practice, a significant number of patients do not respond completely to these combination treatments, and long-term reduction of cardiovascular risk remains insufficient. The particularly high residual cardiovascular risk of hypertensive patients, even when adequately treated with strategies based on renin angiotensin aldosterone system blockers, speaks in favor of new, innovative strategies. Thus, it has become relevant to consider whether it is always necessary to block plasma renin activation and whether other guideline-approved combinations should be considered routinely. Diuretic/calcium channel blocker combinations, which are supported by significant long-term evidence, are put forth as a preferred combination in the main guidelines, but are still underused by physicians who do not yet have easy access to such treatments. Fixed-dose indapamide sustained release/amlodipine is the first such single-pill combination to become available. Complementary mechanisms of action of these two molecules are expected to lead to greater and longer-term reductions in systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure and potentially to the reduction of cardiovascular risk.

Aliskiren and amlodipine in the management of essential hypertension: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Aliskiren is a novel renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor, the combination therapy of aliskiren and amlodipine for blood pressure control have been reported recently. The primary objective of this analysis is to review recently reported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare antihypertensive effects and adverse events between mono (amlodipine or aliskiren alone) and combination therapy of both medicines.

Methods

Databases for the search included Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Revman v5.0 statistical program was used to analyze the data. Weighted mean differences (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for the calculation of continuous data, and relative risk (RR) with a 95% CI was used for dichotomous data.

Results

We analyzed the data from 7 RCTs for a total of 6074 participants in this meta-analysis. We found that the aliskiren/amlodipine combination therapy had a stronger effect in lowering blood pressure as compared with the monotherapy using aliskiren (SBP: WMD = −10.42, 95% CI −13.03∼−7.82, P<0.00001; DBP: WMD = −6.60, 95% CI −7.22∼−5.97, P<0.00001) or amlodipine (SBP: WMD = −4.85, 95% CI −6.88∼−2.81, P<0.00001; DBP: WMD = −2.91, 95% CI −3.85∼−1.97, P<0.00001). No differences were found in terms of adverse events between combination therapy and monotherapy, except for the rates of peripheral edema and hypokalaemia which were significantly lower in the combination therapy than in the amlodipine monotherapy (RR = 0.78, 0.66∼0.92, P = 0.004; RR = 0.51, 0.27∼0.97, P = 0.04). Similar antihypertensive effects were found in both obese (body mass index > = 30 kg/m²) hypertensive and non-obese (body mass index <30 kg/m²) hypertensive patients. Moreover, there was no difference with the blood pressure lowering or adverse effects with regards to the combination therapy in both subgroups.

Conclusion

We found that aliskiren/amlodipine combination therapy provided a more effective blood pressure reduction than monotherapy with either drug without increase in the occurrence of adverse events.

End organ protection by calcium-channel blockers

In recent years, much attention has been given to end organ protection by antihypertensive, anti-heart failure, and anti-ischemic medications. This review describes the available information on end organ protection by calcium-channel blockers (CCBs). In normotensive patients and patients with hypertension treated with long-acting dihydropyridines, medial thickness was thinner than in patients treated with atenolol or in untreated hypertensive patients. Long-term treatment was associated with significant reduction in left ventricular mass. Calcium-channel blockers also improved endothelial-dependent relaxation and reversed the vasoconstrictive response to nitric oxide inhibitors. In diabetic patients, CCBs were effective in preserving kidney function and microalbuminurea. The combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and CCBs was more effective than ACE inhibitors alone in preserving kidney function. In animal experiments, CCBs prevented development of coronary atheroschlerosis; however, in humans only limited data are available on their antiatherogenic effect. Some studies suggest that CCBs exert antiplatelets properties and may therefore be beneficial in patients with coronary artery disease.

Studies on left ventricular hypertrophy regression in arterial hypertension: a clear message for the clinician?

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based medicine should provide clear and unbiased information to clinicians. We conducted an analysis on published randomized trials evaluating the effects of antihypertensive therapy on left ventricular (LV) morphology assessed by echocardiography to investigate (i) the consistency of criteria used for definition of LV hypertrophy (LVH) and (ii) the consistency of the way LVH regression and blood pressure (BP) control were reported.

METHODS

Studies identified by a PubMed search were eligible for inclusion in the analysis, if they fulfilled the following criteria: (i) publication in a peer-reviewed journal within the last 12 years; (ii) double blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-group design; (iii) numerosity of at least 50 adult hypertensive subjects; (iv) follow-up duration of at least 6 months; (v) comparison between single-drugs or association regimens; (vi) LV mass (LVM) or wall thickness measured by echocardiography.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine trials, including 9,162 hypertensive subjects of both genders in 78 active treatment arms or in 6 placebo arms were identified. Definition of LVH was provided by 34 studies (87.1%) according to 19 different criteria. All trials evaluated LVH regression as the absolute or relative changes of continuous variables such as LVM index (LVMI) or LV wall thickness. Data concerning prevalence rates of LVM normalization were reported in 12 studies (30.7%). The percentage of patients reaching BP target (<140/90 mm Hg) was reported in 11 studies (28.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that (i) definition of hypertensive LVH phenotype is extremely variable, and (ii) no precise information on LVH regression rates or changes in LV geometrical patterns, as well as on target BP, is provided by the majority of papers.

Calcium antagonists

Calcium antagonists were introduced for the treatment of hypertension in the 1980s. Their use was subsequently expanded to additional disorders, such as angina pectoris, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Raynaud phenomenon, pulmonary hypertension, diffuse esophageal spasms, and migraine. Calcium antagonists as a group are heterogeneous and include 3 main classes--phenylalkylamines, benzothiazepines, and dihydropyridines--that differ in their molecular structure, sites and modes of action, and effects on various other cardiovascular functions. Calcium antagonists lower blood pressure mainly through vasodilation and reduction of peripheral resistance. They maintain blood flow to vital organs, and are safe in patients with renal impairment. Unlike diuretics and beta-blockers, calcium antagonists do not impair glucose metabolism or lipid profile and may even attenuate the development of arteriosclerotic lesions. In long-term follow-up, patients treated with calcium antagonists had development of less overt diabetes mellitus than those who were treated with diuretics and beta-blockers. Moreover, calcium antagonists are able to reduce left ventricular mass and are effective in improving anginal pain. Recent prospective randomized studies attested to the beneficial effects of calcium antagonists in hypertensive patients. In comparison with placebo, calcium antagonist-based therapy reduced major cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death significantly in elderly hypertensive patients and in diabetic patients. In several comparative studies in hypertensive patients, treatment with calcium antagonists was equally effective as treatment with diuretics, beta-blockers, or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. From these studies, it seems that a calcium antagonist-based regimen is superior to other regimens in preventing stroke, equivalent in preventing ischemic heart disease, and inferior in preventing congestive heart failure. Calcium antagonists are also safe and effective as first-line or add-on therapy in diabetic hypertensive patients. Heart rate-lowering calcium antagonists (verapamil, diltiazem) may have an edge over the dihydropyridines in post-myocardial infarction patients and in diabetic nephropathy. Thus, calcium antagonists may be safely used in the management of hypertension and angina pectoris.

Comparative Effects of Irbesartan Versus Amlodipine on Left Ventricular Mass Index in Hypertensive Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

The aim of this study was to comparatively assess the effects of irbesartan and amlodipine monotherapies on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in patients with mild to moderate untreated hypertension and echocardiographically determined left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Sixty hypertensive patients (35 men, 25 women; mean age, 52.8 years +/- 12.6) with diastolic blood pressure (BP) > or = 100 mm Hg were randomized to irbesartan 150 mg once daily or amlodipine 5 mg once daily for a 4-week titration period. Dosage of both drugs was increased to irbesartan 300 mg once daily or amlodipine 10 mg once daily in case of sitting diastolic BP still >90 mm Hg after the first 2 weeks of treatment. Dosage doubling was necessary in more than 50% of patients in both treatment groups. After the titration period, only the responders (sitting diastolic BP < or = 90 mm Hg) entered a 5-month maintenance period. After 3 months, echocardiographically estimated LVMI decreased by 23.2% in the irbesartan-treated patients and 11.4% in the amlodipine-treated patients, with an adjusted mean difference of 11.8% in favor of irbesartan (P < 0.0001). After 6 months, it decreased by 24.7% in the irbesartan-treated patients and 13.0% in the amlodipine-treated patients, with an adjusted mean difference of 11.6% in favor of irbesartan (P < 0.0001).

Cardiac effects of calcium antagonists in systemic hypertension

The calcium antagonists are a class of heterogeneous drugs, with a wide spectrum of direct and indirect cardiac effects that vary a great deal from one drug to another and depend upon formulation and duration of action. Calcium antagonists act by decreasing total peripheral resistance to lower arterial pressure. As a consequence, reflex tachycardia, increased cardiac output, and increased plasma catecholamine and plasma renin activity are commonly seen, particularly with the initial dose and with short-acting dihydropyridines. The abrupt vasodilation can paradoxically elicit angina and even acute myocardial infarction. These hemodynamic and neuroendocrine changes are less pronounced with the long-acting formulations. Most calcium antagonists diminish automaticity of the sinus node, slow conduction in the atrioventricular node, and have little, if any, effect on the automaticity of the myocytes. The dihydropyridines generally have less effect on automaticity and cardiac conduction than nondihydropyridines. The negative inotropic effect is most profound with nondihydropyridines and is greatly reduced or absent with newer dihydropyridines, such as isradipine, felodipine, amlodipine, and nisoldipine. Long-acting calcium antagonists generally improve myocardial oxygenation by unloading the heart, increasing coronary blood flow, and reducing myocardial oxygen consumption. Thus, calcium antagonists have a variety of beneficial effects in patients with hypertensive heart disease: they reduce left ventricular hypertrophy and its sequelae, such as ventricular dysrhythmias, impaired filling and contractility, and myocardial ischemia. Ongoing studies should provide a more conclusive answer regarding the efficacy and safety of calcium antagonists.

Effect of amlodipine on the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells of spontaneously hypertensive rats

The effect of anti-hypertensive drug amlodipine on regression of cardiovascular hypertrophy due to hypertension was studied by using cultured smooth muscle cells derived from arteries of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and measuring [3H]-TdR and [3H]-Leucine binding. 48 h after adding amlodipine, [3H]-TdR binding in arterial smooth muscle cells from SHR in vitro was reduced by 50.5% and [3H]-Leucine binding was reduced by 56.2% as compared with neuropeptide Y (NPY)-treated group. However, there was no significant change in cell number. The results showed that amlodipine could effectively inhibit increase of DNA and protein synthesis of vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) due to NPY. It indicates that amlodipine is of great significance on regression of genesis and development of cardiovascular hypertrophy due to hypertension.