Active Dose Findings for Lercanidipine in a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Design in Patients with Mild to Moderate Hypertension:

New Insights into the Nephroprotective Potential of Lercanidipine

Kidneys are responsible for many crucial biological processes in the human body, including maintaining the water-electrolyte balance, pH, and blood pressure (BP), along with the elimination of toxins. Despite this, chronic kidney disease (CKD), which affects more and more people, is a disease that develops insidiously without causing any symptoms at first. The main purpose of this article is to summarize the existing literature on lercanidipine, with a particular focus on its nephroprotective properties. Lercanidipine is a third-generation dihydropyridine (DHP) blocker of calcium channels, and as such it possesses unique qualities such as high lipophilicity and high vascular selectivity. Furthermore, it acts by reversibly inhibiting L-type and T-type calcium channels responsible for exerting positive renal effects. It has been shown to reduce tissue inflammation and tubulointerstitial fibrosis, contributing to a decrease in proteinuria. Moreover, it exhibited antioxidative effects and increased expression of molecules responsible for repairing damaged tissues. It also decreased cell proliferation, preventing thickening of the vascular lumen. This article summarizes studies simultaneously comparing the effect of lercanidipine with other antihypertensive drugs. There is still a lack of studies on the medications used in patients with CKD, and an even greater lack of studies on those used in patients with concomitant hypertension. Therefore, further studies on lercanidipine and its potential in hypertensive patients with coexisting CKD are required.

COMBINATION THERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION: EFFECTIVENESS OF THE LERCANIDIPINE AND ENALAPRIL COMBINATION

This review presents the evidence on the benefits of fixed-dose combination therapy for arterial hypertension management. The focus is on the combination of a third-generation dihydropyridine calcium antagonist lercanidipine and an ACE inhibitor enalapril. Lercanidipine is characterised by high vascular selectivity and lipophilicity, good antihypertensive effectiveness, and prolonged, gradually developing therapeutic effects. Literature data on the effectiveness of the lercanidipine-enalapril combination are presented. This combination facilitates a marked reduction in blood pressure levels, which is particularly relevant for elderly patients and patients with diabetes mellitus or obesity. The combination of pharmacologic effects of lercanidipine and enalapril provides additional benefits in terms of organ protection and reduction of adverse effects of the antihypertensive treatment. 

Lercanidipine vs lacidipine in isolated systolic hypertension

This randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, multicentre study compared the efficacy and tolerability of lercanidipine with lacidipine. Elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (supine blood pressure >/=160/<95 mmHg) were enrolled and underwent a placebo run-in period of 14-27 days before random allocation to lercanidipine tablets 10 mg once daily (n=111) or lacidipine tablets 2 mg once daily (n=111) for the assessment period (112-160 days). Titration to lercanidipine 20 mg once daily (two 10 mg tablets) or lacidipine 4 mg once daily (two 2 mg tablets) was allowed after 8 weeks, if required. Both treatments decreased supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure between the end of the run-in period and the end of the assessment period (P<0.0001). At the end of the assessment period, the estimated mean treatment difference (95% confidence intervals) in supine systolic blood pressure was -0.81 (-4.45, 2.84) mmHg. These confidence intervals were within the limits specified for equivalence, that is, (-5, 5) mmHg. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring showed that the antihypertensive effects of both drugs lasted for the full 24-h dosing period and followed a circadian pattern. Both treatments were well tolerated with a low incidence of adverse drug reactions and a low withdrawal rate. Significantly fewer patients withdrew from treatment with lercanidipine (P=0.015). Neither treatment had any clinically significant effect on pulse rate or cardiac conduction. In conclusion, both treatments were equally effective in controlling supine systolic blood pressure in patients with isolated systolic hypertension.

Effect of treatment with lercanidipine on heart of Cohen-Rosenthal diabetic hypertensive rats

The influence of treatment with the dihydropyridine-type Ca2+ antagonist lercanidipine on heart and coronary microanatomic changes was investigated in spontaneously hypertensive rats, Cohen-diabetic rats, and Cohen-Rosenthal diabetic hypertensive rats. At 12 weeks of age, animals were left untreated (control groups) or were treated for 8 weeks with an oral dose of 3 mg/kg per day of lercanidipine. Wistar-Kyoto rats were used as a normotensive reference group. In spontaneously hypertensive rats and diabetic hypertensive rats, systolic blood pressure was higher in comparison with Wistar-Kyoto rats. Augmented pressure values were decreased by lercanidipine treatment. Systolic blood pressure was slightly higher in Cohen-diabetic rats than in Wistar-Kyoto rats, and this increase was countered by treatment with lercanidipine. In spontaneously hypertensive rats, diabetic rats, and diabetic hypertensive rats, the thickness of left ventricle and cardiocyte area were increased. Focal connective tissue areas and diffuse accumulation of connective tissue were observed in the left ventricle of spontaneously hypertensive and Cohen-diabetic rats, respectively. Pharmacological treatment countered left ventricle thickening and restored cardiocyte area values in subendocardium. An increased thickness of tunica media accompanied by luminal narrowing was found in coronary artery branches of control spontaneously hypertensive and diabetic hypertensive rats. Treatment with lercanidipine countered vascular changes primarily in small-sized coronary arteries. These results indicate that hypertensive, diabetic, and diabetic hypertensive rats undergo cardiac hypertrophy and vascular changes affecting small-sized coronary arteries. Treatment with lercanidipine countered hypertension-related cardiac and coronary changes, suggesting that this dihydropyridine-type Ca2+ antagonist may improve heart and coronary structure in diabetes associated with hypertension.

A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of lercanidipine tablets and losartan tablets in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension

A double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, multicentre study to compare the efficacy and tolerability of lercanidipine with losartan. Patients with mild to moderate hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95-115 mm Hg) were enrolled and underwent a placebo run-in period of 14-30 days before random allocation to lercanidipine tablets 10 mg once-daily (n = 234) or losartan tablets 50 mg once-daily (n = 231) during the assessment period (approximately 16 weeks). Titration to lercanidipine 20 mg once-daily (two 10 mg tablets) or losartan 100 mg once-daily (two 50 mg tablets) was allowed after 8 weeks, if necessary. At the end of the study, 71% of patients who received lercanidipine tablets had achieved normalised DBP (ie, < or =90 mm Hg) and 81% had responded to treatment (ie, DBP < or =90 mm Hg or a decrease in DBP > or =10 mm Hg). The corresponding numbers in the losartan tablets group were 65% and 78%, respectively. In those patients who required dose titration, there was evidence of a greater response with lercanidipine tablets than with losartan tablets. Both treatments were well tolerated with a low incidence of adverse drug reactions and a low withdrawal rate. In conclusion, the antihypertensive effects of lercanidipine tablets were comparable with those of losartan tablets; both treatments gave a high response rate for an antihypertensive monotherapy and were very well tolerated.

Lercanidipine in type II diabetic patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension

This study evaluates the effects of lercanidipine antihypertensive treatment on glucose homeostasis in patients with type II diabetes mellitus with mild to moderate hypertension. Forty patients were enrolled. After a 2-week wash-out period, they were randomly allocated to receive in double-blind manner either 10 mg or 20 mg in single daily administration for 8 weeks. Nonresponding patients after the initial 4 weeks, were titrated up to 20 mg and 30 mg lercanidipine, respectively. At the end of the double-blind treatment, all patients entered in single-blind 4 weeks placebo follow-up. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure significantly decreased in both groups of patients after 4 weeks of treatment, and decreased further during the following 4 weeks. In both groups, progressive and significant decrease in fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin and area under the curve of the oral glucose tolerance test were detected during lercanidipine treatment. Similarly, a decrease in serum fructosamine values were also observed. All variables returned to towards baseline values during the placebo follow-up period. Adverse events (headache and mild asthenia) were limited to two patients and resolved spontaneously. These data indicate that lercanidipine is effective in lowering high blood pressure in hypertensive patients with type II diabetes mellitus and does not exert negative effects on glucose homeostasis.

Lercanidipine: a novel dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker

Calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) have been used for the treatment of hypertension for more than 20 years, and recent clinical trials support the efficacy and safety of long-acting dihydropyridine (DHP) CCBs for a wide spectrum of hypertensive patients, including diabetic hypertensive patients. DHP CCBs are effective agents overall and are particularly effective when used in combination with other agents. Lercanidipine is a novel DHP CCB effective for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. Compared with other DHP CCBs, lercanidipine has a molecular design that imparts greater solubility within the arterial cellular membrane bilayer, membrane-controlled kinetics, and a high cholesterol tolerance factor. These favorable membrane-controlled kinetics impart a gradual onset of vasodilation and a long duration of action. Further, the unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of lercanidipine appear to contribute to its efficacy and favorable safety profile. In clinical trials in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension, lercanidipine was administered at a starting dose of 10 mg once daily, and increased to 20 mg once daily for nonresponders. Studies have shown that lercanidipine has a 24-hour antihypertensive effect and causes no significant increase in heart rate. Lercanidipine has been shown to be effective in a wide range of hypertensive patients, including mild-to-moderate hypertension, severe hypertension, the elderly, and those with isolated systolic hypertension. It is associated with a low rate of adverse events. Because of its efficacy and favorable safety profile, lercanidipine has the potential to improve blood pressure control in a wide range of patients, including those who have not responded to, or who have been unable to tolerate, other antihypertensive agents.

Efficacy and tolerability of lercanidipine in monotherapy in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of lercanidipine, used as monotherapy once a day, in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), 83 patients were enrolled in this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. All patients were older than 60 years, and their mean age was 66.7 +/- 5.4 years. ISH was defined as SBP > or = 160 mmHg, and DBP < 95 mmHg. After wash-out and placebo run-in periods, patients were randomly assigned to placebo or lercanidipine (10 mg once a day) treatment for 4 weeks. Non-responding patients of the lercanidipine-treated group were later treated with 20 mg of lercanidipine once a day for 4 additional weeks. At the end of the study, the reduction in systolic blood pressure was significantly larger in the lercanidipine-treated patients (-32.4 mmHg) compared to the fall observed in the placebo group (-9.6 mmHg). Diastolic blood pressure decreased slightly but significantly in the lercanidipine-treated patients only. At the end of lercanidipine treatment, 23 of 37 patients (62%) were normalized. Changes in heart rate, occurrence of orthostatic hypotension, and clinically relevant changes in electrocardiographic and laboratory findings were not observed in either group. Lercanidipine treatment was suspended in one patient because of epigastric pain. These data indicate that lercanidipine, used as monotherapy once a day, is effective in lowering elevated systolic blood pressure in elderly patients, and is well tolerated.