SB 234551, a novel endothelin--A receptor antagonist, unmasks endothelin-induced renal vasodilatation in the dog

Endothelin type A and B receptors in the control of afferent and efferent arterioles in mice

BACKGROUND

Endothelin 1 contributes to renal blood flow control and pathogenesis of kidney diseases. The differential effects, however, of endothelin 1 (ET-1) on afferent (AA) and efferent arterioles (EA) remain to be established.

METHODS

We investigated endothelin type A and B receptor (ETA-R, ETB-R) functions in the control of AA and EA. Arterioles of ETB-R deficient, rescued mice [ETB(-/-)] and wild types [ETB(+/+)] were microperfused.

RESULTS

ET-1 constricted AA stronger than EA in ETB(-/-) and ETB(+/+) mice. Results in AA: ET-1 induced similar constrictions in ETB(-/-) and ETB(+/+) mice. BQ-123 (ETA-R antagonist) inhibited this response in both groups. ALA-ET-1 and IRL1620 (ETB-R agonists) had no effect on arteriolar diameter. L-NAME did neither affect basal diameters nor ET-1 responses. Results in EA: ET-1 constricted EA stronger in ETB(+/+) compared to ETB(-/-). BQ-123 inhibited the constriction completely only in ETB(-/-). ALA-ET-1 and IRL1620 constricted only arterioles of ETB(+/+) mice. L-NAME decreased basal diameter in ETB(+/+), but not in ETB(-/-) mice and increased the ET-1 response similarly in both groups. The L-NAME actions indicate a contribution of ETB-R in basal nitric oxide (NO) release in EA and suggest dilatory action of ETA-R in EA.

CONCLUSIONS

ETA-R mediates vasoconstriction in AA and contributes to vasoconstriction in EA in this mouse model. ETB-R has no effect in AA but mediates basal NO release and constriction in EA. The stronger effect of ET-1 on AA supports observations of decreased glomerular filtration rate to ET-1 and indicates a potential contribution of ET-1 to the pathogenesis of kidney diseases.

The endothelin system and its antagonism in chronic kidney disease

The incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing worldwide. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is strongly associated with CKD and constitutes one of its major causes of morbidity and mortality. Treatments that slow the progression of CKD and improve the cardiovascular risk profile of patients with CKD are needed. The endothelins (ET) are a family of related peptides, of which ET-1 is the most powerful endogenous vasoconstrictor and the predominant isoform in the cardiovascular and renal systems. The ET system has been widely implicated in both CVD and CKD. ET-1 contributes to the pathogenesis and maintenance of hypertension and arterial stiffness and more novel cardiovascular risk factors such as oxidative stress and inflammation. Through these, ET also contributes to endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. By reversal of these effects, ET antagonists may reduce cardiovascular risk. In particular relation to the kidney, antagonism of the ET system may be of benefit in improving renal hemodynamics and reducing proteinuria. ET likely also is involved in progression of renal disease, and data are emerging to suggest a synergistic role for ET receptor antagonists with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in slowing CKD progression.

Dual constrictor and dilator actions of ET(B) receptors in the rat renal microcirculation: interactions with ET(A) receptors

The vascular actions of endothelin-1 (ET-1) reflect the combination of vasoconstrictor ET(A) and ET(B) receptors on smooth muscle cells and vasodilator ET(B) receptors on endothelial cells. The present study investigated the contribution of ET receptor subtypes using a comprehensive battery of agonists and antagonists infused directly into the renal artery of anesthetized rats to evaluate the actions of each receptor class alone and their interactions. ET-1 (5 pmol) reduced renal blood flow (RBF) 25+/-1%. ET(A) antagonist BQ-123 attenuated this response to a 15+/-1% decrease in RBF (P < 0.01), indicating net constriction by ET(B) receptors. Combined receptor blockade (BQ-123+BQ-788) resulted in a renal vasoconstriction of 7+/-1% (P = 0.001 vs. BQ-123), supporting a constrictor action of ET(B) receptors. In marked contrast, the ET(B) antagonist BQ-788 enhanced the ET-1 RBF response to 60+/-5% (P < 0.001), suggesting ET(B)-mediated net dilation. Consistent with ET(A) blockade, the ET(B) agonist sarafotoxin 6C (S6C) produced vasoconstriction, reducing RBF by 23+/-5%. Dose-response curves for ET-1 and S6C showed similar degrees of constriction between 0.2 and 100 pmol. Both antagonists (BQ-123, BQ-788) were equally effective at threefold lower than the standard doses, suggesting complete inhibition. We conclude that ET(B) receptors alone exert a net constrictor effect but cause a net dilator influence when costimulated with ET(A) receptors. Such opposing actions indicate more complex than additive interaction between receptor subtypes. Model analysis suggests ET(A)-mediated constriction is appreciably greater without than with costimulation of ET(B) receptors. Possible explanations include ET-1 clearance by ET(B) receptors and/or a dilator ET(B) receptor function that counteracts constriction.

Pharmacology of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition in the kidney

Cyclooxygenase (COX) exists as two unique isoforms (that is, COX-1 and COX-2) which are poorly understood with regard to their roles in renal function. The renal effects of conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are believed to result from the inhibition of one or both isoforms. Drugs that selectively inhibit COX-2 provide useful pharmacological tools for discerning the effects associated with the inhibition of the individual isoforms, and may help clarify the renal roles of COX-1 and COX-2. This review summarizes the current data on the renal expression of COX isoforms and their potential roles in renal function, and reviews the studies that have attempted to correlate renal functional changes with selective isoform inhibition. Since there are significant differences in the expression of COX isoforms in the kidneys of laboratory animals and humans, this review also examines the correlation of the results of COX inhibition in experimental studies in laboratory animals with clinical data. Because of potential interspecies differences in the roles of COX isoforms in renal function, animal models may have limited predictive value for patients, particularly those with renal risk factors. Accordingly, any uncertainty concerning the safety or therapeutic benefit of COX-2-specific drugs in these patient populations will need to be resolved with clinical investigations.

Hemodynamic effects of bosentan in patients with chronic heart failure

A role of the potent and long-acting vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin-1 and the pathophysiology of chronic human heart failure has been postulated based upon indirect evidence such as elevated plasma endothelin-1 levels and their with the degree of hemodynamic impairment. The advent of specific of endothelin-1 receptor antagonists has provided the opportunity not only to directly evaluate its pathophysiological role but also to assess its potential role as a new approach to heart failure therapy. This brief review summarizes the evidence linking endothelin-1 to the pathophysiology of chronic heart failure and the clinical results obtained in patients during acute, intravenous and more prolonged, oral administration with bosentan, a mixed ET(A)/ET(B)-receptor antagonist. Bosentan acutely and during short-term oral therapy markedly improved hemodynamics in patients in addition to standard heart failure therapy, including an ACE-inhibitor. These effects were associated with a reduced responsiveness of the renin-angiotensin system to diuretic therapy and reduced basal plasma aldosterone levels. Although the hemodynamic and neurohumoral profile of short-term bosentan therapy looks promising for the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure appropriate trials will have to be performed to document clinical benefit during long-term therapy. Finally, the question remains open whether mixed endothelin-1 receptor antagonists like bosentan will have similar effects as compared to antagonists which block the ET(A) receptor only.

Rationale and perspective of endothelin-1 antagonism in acute heart failure

A role of the potent and long-acting vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin (ET)- I in the pathophysiology of chronic human heart failure has been postulated, based upon indirect evidence such as elevated plasma ET-1 levels and their relationship to the degree of haemodynamic impairment. Acute heart failure shares many features of chronic heart failure, albeit in an exaggerated fashion. As both the mixed ETA/ETB-receptor antagonist bosentan and the selective ETA receptor antagonist BQ 123 acutely improved the haemodynamics of chronic heart failure patients, there seems to be good reason to believe that ET-1 receptor antagonism may also be of benefit in the setting of acute heart failure. However, appropriate trials will have to be performed to document the clinical benefit of such an approach. Finally, the question remains open as to whether mixed ET-1 receptor antagonists like bosentan will prove better, worse or equal to antagonists that block the ETA, receptor only.

Effects of the novel selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, SB 234551, on the cardiovascular responses to endotoxaemia in conscious rats

1. In conscious, freely moving, male, Long Evans rats, regional haemodynamic responses to exogenous endothelin-1 (ET-1; 25, 50 and 250 pmol kg(-1) i.v.) were assessed in the presence of vehicle, or the selective ET(A)-receptor antagonist, SB 234551. On the following day, the effects of SB 234551 on the haemodynamic responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) infusion (150 microg kg(-1) h(-1), i.v.) were determined. 2. When SB 234551 was given i.v. by primed infusion at a dose of 0.3 mg kg(-1) bolus, 0.3 mg kg(-1) h(-1) infusion, it caused selective inhibition of the vasoconstrictor effects of exogenous endothelin-1, whereas at a dose of 1 mg kg(-1), 1 mg kg(-1) h(-1), SB 234551 also inhibited some of the vasodilator effects of endothelin-1. 3. Infusion of LPS, in the presence of vehicle, caused a short-lived (1 - 2 h) hypotension, tachycardia, and vasodilatation in renal, superior mesenteric and hindquarters vascular beds. Thereafter, blood pressure, heart rate and mesenteric vascular conductance returned to baseline values, but renal vasodilatation persisted, and there was vasoconstriction in the hindquarters. 4. In the presence of SB 234551 (0.3 mg kg(-1), 0.3 mg kg(-1) h(-1)), the early (1 - 2 h) cardiovascular responses to LPS infusion were unaffected, but the subsequent recovery of mean arterial blood pressure was impaired, due to developing vasodilatation in the mesenteric and, to a lesser extent, hindquarters, vascular beds. SB 234551 had no effect on the renal haemodynamic responses to LPS infusion. 5. The results confirm an important, regionally-selective, vasoconstrictor role for endogenous endothelin in this model of endotoxaemia.

The role of endothelin receptor antagonists in the treatment of chronic heart failure

A role of the potent and long-acting vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin-1 in the pathophysiology of chronic human heart failure has been postulated based on indirect evidence such as elevated plasma endothelin-1 levels, their correlation with the degree of hemodynamic impairment, and their predictive value for patient survival. The advent of specific of endothelin-1 receptor antagonists has provided the opportunity to directly evaluate its pathophysiologic role and assess its potential role as a new approach to heart failure therapy. This review summarizes the evidence linking endothelin-1 to the pathophysiology of chronic heart failure, and analyzes the clinical results obtained thus far in patients during acute intravenous, and more prolonged, oral administration of endothelin-1-receptor antagonists.

Selective ET(A) receptor antagonism with ABT-627 attenuates all renal effects of endothelin in humans

++Endothelin (ET-1) acts as a potent vasoconstrictor in the human kidney, and this vasoconstriction could contribute to the ischemia seen in acute renal failure. In animal studies, the vasoactive properties of ET-1 are known to be ET(A) receptor-and/or ET(B) receptor-mediated; however, the receptor subtype involved in the human kidney remains to be defined. In a phase I, single-center, double-blind, randomized, three-period, crossover design, the effects of orally administered ABT-627, a selective ET(A) receptor antagonist, on renal hemodynamics during ET-1 infusion were evaluated. Two doses of ABT-627 (5 and 20 mg) were compared with placebo and nifedipine. For each dose level of ABT-627, a cohort of nine subjects was studied. A para-aminohippuric acid/inulin clearance test was performed once at the end of each 7-d treatment period. Infusion of ET-1 significantly decreased effective renal plasma flow, GFR, sodium excretion, and urine flow. Pretreatment with 20 mg of ABT-627 significantly decreased mean arterial pressure. In contrast, 7 d of treatment with both doses of ABT-627 did not affect baseline renal parameters. However, because mean arterial pressure decreased, a tendency toward a reduction of renal vascular resistance could indeed be demonstrated. Compared with placebo, both doses of ABT-627 were equally effective in blocking all renal effects caused by ET-1 infusion. In the model of exogenous ET-1 infusion, ABT-627 had a tendency to prevent ET-1-induced renal changes more effectively compared with nifedipine. The contribution of endogenous ET-1 and the ET(A) receptor in maintaining basal renal vascular tone in the human kidney is small. In addition, compared with placebo, selective ET(A) receptor antagonism with both doses of ABT-627 completely prevented all renal changes caused by ET-1 infusion.