Infarct-size limitation by preconditioning is enhanced by dipyridamole administered before but not after preconditioning: evidence for the role of interstitial adenosine level during preconditioning as a primary determinant of cardioprotection

Ticagrelor Does Not Protect Isolated Rat Hearts, Thus Clouding Its Proposed Cardioprotective Role Through ENT 1 in Heart Tissue

P2Y₁₂ receptor-blocking drugs given at reperfusion offer protection against myocardial infarction in animal models of transient coronary occlusion. Two recent reports concluded that ticagrelor was more cardioprotective than clopidogrel and attributed this to ticagrelor's unique ability to raise tissue adenosine by blocking the equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1. Indeed, an adenosine receptor blocker attenuated ticagrelor's protection. The related P2Y₁₂ inhibitor cangrelor, which does not block the transporter, protects hearts only when platelets are in the perfusate, while adenosine is known to protect equally in situ blood-perfused and crystalloid-perfused isolated hearts. We, therefore, tested whether ticagrelor liberates a sufficient amount of adenosine to protect a Krebs buffer-perfused isolated rat heart subjected to 40 minutes of global ischemia followed by 2 hours of reperfusion. In untreated hearts, 77.6% ± 4.0% of the ventricle was infarcted as measured by triphenyltetrazolium staining. Ischemically preconditioned hearts had only 32.7% ± 3.6% infarction ( P < .001 vs untreated), indicating that our model could be protected by preconditioning which is known to involve adenosine. Strikingly, hearts treated with 10 μmol/L ticagrelor in the buffer throughout the reperfusion period had 77.5% ± 2.4% infarction comparable to unprotected controls ( P = NS vs untreated). These data strongly suggest that ticagrelor was unable to release sufficient adenosine from the crystalloid-perfused rat heart to protect it against infarction. Our previous studies have found no difference in the anti-infarct potency among clopidogrel, cangrelor, and ticagrelor in open-chest rats and rabbits, and surprisingly adenosine receptor antagonists block protection from all 3 drugs. We have no explanation why ticagrelor is more protective in the pig than clopidogrel but suspect a species or perhaps a treatment schedule difference that may or may not involve adenosine.

Effect of dipyridamole on myocardial reperfusion injury: A double-blind randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery

Dipyridamole reduces reperfusion-injury in preclinical trials and may be beneficial in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty, but its effect on patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is unknown. We hypothesized that dipyridamole limits myocardial reperfusion-injury in patients undergoing CABG. The trial design was a double-blind trial randomizing between pretreatment with dipyridamole or placebo. In all, 94 patients undergoing elective on-pump CABG were recruited between February 2010 and June 2012. The primary endpoint was plasma high-sensitive (hs-) troponin-I at 6, 12, and 24 hours after reperfusion. Secondary endpoints were the occurrence of bleeding, arrhythmias, need for inotropic support, and intensive care unit length of stay. Finally, 79 patients (33 dipyridamole) were included in the per-protocol analysis. Dipyridamole did not significantly affect postoperative hs-troponin-I (change in plasma hs-troponin I -3% [95% confidence interval -23% to 36%]; P > 0.1). Secondary endpoints did not differ between groups. Dipyridamole prior to CABG does not significantly reduce postoperative hs-troponin release.

Extracellular signalling molecules in the ischaemic/reperfused heart - druggable and translatable for cardioprotection?

In patients with acute myocardial infarction, timely reperfusion is essential to limit infarct size. However, reperfusion also adds to myocardial injury. Brief episodes of ischaemia/reperfusion in the myocardium or on organ remote from the heart, before or shortly after sustained myocardial ischaemia effectively reduce infarct size, provided there is eventual reperfusion. Such conditioning phenomena have been established in many experimental studies and also translated to humans. The underlying signal transduction, that is the molecular identity of triggers, mediators and effectors, is not clear yet in detail, but several extracellular signalling molecules, such as adenosine, bradykinin and opioids, have been identified to contribute to cardioprotection by conditioning manoeuvres. Several trials have attempted the translation of cardioprotection by such autacoids into a clinical scenario of myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion. Adenosine and its selective agonists reduced infarct size in a few studies, but this benefit was not translated into improved clinical outcome. All studies with bradykinin or drugs which increase bradykinin's bioavailability reported reduced infarct size and some of them also improved clinical outcome. Synthetic opioid agonists did not result in a robust infarct size reduction, but this failure of translation may relate to the cardioprotective properties of the underlying anaesthesia per se or of the comparator drugs. The translation of findings in healthy, young animals with acute coronary occlusion/reperfusion to patients of older age, with a variety of co-morbidities and co-medications, suffering from different scenarios of myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion remains a challenge.

Protecting against ischemia-reperfusion injury: antiplatelet drugs, statins, and their potential interactions

Statins and antiplatelet agents are currently used as therapeutic agents for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Statins limit myocardial infarct size by activating phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K), ecto-5'-nucleotidase, Akt/endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), and the downstream effectors inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). Inhibition of PI3K, adenosine receptors, eNOS, iNOS, or COX-2 abrogates the protective effects of statins. At >5 mg/kg, aspirin attenuates the myocardial infarct-size-limiting effect of statins. In contrast, the combination of low-dose atoravastatin with either the phosphodiesterase-III inhibitor cilostazol or the adenosine reuptake inhibitor dipyridamole synergistically limits infarct size. Low-dose aspirin with dipyridamole started during ischemia augmented the infarct-size-limiting effects of simvastatin. In contrast, high-dose aspirin blocked the protective effect of simvastatin. The combination of dipyridamole with low-dose aspirin and simvastatin resulted in the smallest infarct size. According to the most current data available, we believe that antiplatelet regimens may require modification for patients who are receiving statins.

Progress in clinical neurosciences: The 'antiplatelet' agents and the role of the endothelium

The antiplatelet drugs, commonly used in the prevention and treatment of cerebrovascular disease, possess a number of effects that are independent of direct antiplatelet actions. Beneficial and detrimental effects both occur. The endothelium is an important mediator of these non-antiplatelet effects. We performed a literature search to locate articles related to acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), clopidogrel, ticlopidine, and dipyridamole and the interactions of these medications with the endothelium. The role of each of the above medications is explored in relation to vasodilation, inflammation, oxidation, platelet-leukocyte interactions, and thrombogenic tendency via platelet-vessel wall interactions.

Enhanced cardioprotection against ischemia-reperfusion injury with a dipyridamole and low-dose atorvastatin combination

Atorvastatin (ATV) limits infarct size (IS) by activating Akt and ecto-5-nucleotidase, which generates adenosine. Activated Akt and adenosine activate endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). When given orally, high doses (10 mg/kg) are needed to achieve full protection. We determined whether dipyridamole (DIP), by preventing the reuptake of adenosine, has a synergistic effect with ATV in reducing myocardial IS. In this study, rats received 3-days of the following: water, ATV (2 mg·kg−1·day−1), DIP (6 mg·kg−1·day−1), or ATV + DIP. In addition, rats received 3-days of the following: aminophylline (Ami; 10 mg·kg−1·day−1) or Ami + ATV + DIP. Rats underwent 30 min of myocardial ischemia followed by 4 h of reperfusion (IS protocol), or hearts were explanted for immunoblotting. As a result, IS in the controls was 34.0 ± 2.8% of the area at risk. ATV (33.1 ± 2.1%) and DIP (30.5 ± 1.5%) did not affect IS, whereas ATV + DIP reduced IS (12.2 ± 0.5%; P < 0.001 vs. each of the other groups). There was no difference in IS between the Ami alone (48.1 ± 0.8%) and the Ami + ATV + DIP (45.8 ± 2.9%) group ( P = 0.422), suggesting that Ami completely blocked the protective effect. Myocardial adenosine level in the controls was 30.6 ± 3.6 pg/μl. ATV (51.0 ± 4.9 pg/μl) and DIP (51.5 ± 6.8 pg/μl) caused a small increase in adenosine levels, whereas ATV + DIP caused a greater increase in adenosine levels (66.4 ± 3.1 pg/μl). ATV and DIP alone did not affect myocardial Ser473 phosphorylated-Akt and Ser1177 phosphorylated-eNOS levels, whereas ATV + DIP significantly increased them. In conclusion, low-dose ATV and DIP had synergistic effects in reducing myocardial IS and activation of Akt and eNOS. This combination may have a potential benefit in augmenting the eNOS-mediated pleiotropic effects of statins.

Intravenous adenosine protects the myocardium primarily by activation of a neurogenic pathway

Endogenous adenosine is a trigger for ischemic myocardial preconditioning (IPC). Although intravascular administration of adenosine has been used to further unravel the mechanism of protection by IPC, it is questionable whether adenosine and IPC employ the same signaling pathways to exert cardioprotection. We therefore investigated whether the active metabolic barrier of the endothelium prevents an increase in myocardial interstitial adenosine concentrations by intravenous adenosine, using microdialysis, and also the role of NO and activation of a neurogenic pathway in the cardioprotection by adenosine. In pentobarbital-anesthetized rats, area at risk and infarct size (IS) were determined 120 min after a 60-min coronary artery occlusion (CAO), using trypan blue and nitro-blue-tetrazolium staining, respectively. IPC with a single 15-min CAO and a 15-min adenosine infusion (ADO, 200 microg min(-1) i.v.) limited IS to the same extent (IS = 41 +/- 6% and IS = 40 +/- 4%, respectively) compared to control rats (IS = 63 +/- 3%, both P < 0.05). However, IPC increased myocardial interstitial adenosine levels seven-fold from 4.3 +/- 0.7 to 27.1 +/- 10.0 microM (P < 0.05), while ADO had no effect on interstitial adenosine (4.1 +/- 1.2 microM), or any of the other purines. The NO synthase inhibitor N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine (LNNA), which did not affect IS (IS = 62 +/- 3%), attenuated the protection by ADO (IS = 56 +/- 3%; P < 0.05 vs ADO, P = NS vs LNNA). The ganglion blocker hexamethonium, which had also no effect on IS (IS = 66 +/- 3%), blunted the protection by ADO (IS = 55 +/- 4%; P < 0.05 vs ADO and vs hexamethonium). These observations demonstrate that cardioprotection by ADO is dependent on NO, and is primarily mediated by activation of a neurogenic pathway.

Blockade of nucleoside transport is required for delivery of intraarterial adenosine into the interstitium: relevance to therapeutic preconditioning in humans

BACKGROUND

Adenosine, a known mediator of preconditioning, has been infused into the coronary circulation to induce therapeutic preconditioning, eg, in preparation for angioplasty. However, results have been disappointing. We tested the hypothesis that endothelial nucleoside transporter acts as a barrier impeding the delivery of intravascular adenosine into the underlying myocardium and that this can be overcome with dipyridamole, a nucleoside transporter blocker.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We infused saline or adenosine (0.125 and 0.5 mg/min) into the brachial artery while monitoring forearm blood flow (FBF) and interstitial adenosine levels with microdialysis probes implanted in the flexor digitorum superficialis of the forearm in 7 healthy volunteers during intravenous administration of saline or dipyridamole (loading dose, 0.142 mg/kg per min for 5 minutes followed by 0.004 mg/kg per min). Adenosine produced near maximal forearm vasodilation, increasing FBF from 4.0+/-0.7 to 10.4+/-1.9 and 13.1+/-1.6 mL/100 mL per min for the low and high doses, respectively, but did not increase muscle dialysate adenosine concentration (from 88+/-21 to 65+/-23 and 85+/-26 nmol/L). Intravenous dipyridamole enhanced resting muscle dialysate adenosine (from 77+/-25 to 147+/-50 nmol/L), adenosine-induced increase in FBF (from 4.1+/-0.8 to 12.6+/-3 and 15.1+/-3 mL/100 mL per min for the low and high dose, respectively), and the delivery of adenosine into the interstitium (to 290+/-80 and 299+/-143 nmol/L for the low and high dose, respectively, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravascular adenosine is likely ineffective in inducing myocardial preconditioning because of poor interstitial delivery. This can be overcome by blocking the nucleoside transporter with dipyridamole.

Myocardial adenosine does not correlate with the protection mediated by ischaemic or pharmacological preconditioning in rat heart

1. We tested the hypothesis that ischaemic preconditioning of the rat heart activates cardiovascular adenosine formation to provide enhanced cardioprotection. 2. Rat isolated perfused hearts were either non-preconditioned, preconditioned with 5 min ischaemia or treated for 5 min with the alpha1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine (50 micro mol/L) before being subjected to 30 min sustained ischaemia followed by 30 min reperfusion. Isolated cardiomyocytes were either non-preconditioned, subjected to 10 min simulated ischaemia or treated for 10 min with phenylephrine (50 micro mol/L) before being subjected to 30 min simulated ischaemia. Functional recovery of hearts and cell viability were used as indices of the effects of ischaemia. 3. Myocardial adenosine, as well as intracellular pH, was determined at the end of the preconditioning period and at 10, 20 and 30 min of sustained ischaemia. Intracellular pH was also determined during the reperfusion. 4. Ischaemic or pharmacological preconditioning with phenylephrine correlated with an improved functional recovery of perfused hearts during reperfusion and increased cell viability during ischaemia. 5. In perfused hearts, ischaemic preconditioning resulted in increased adenosine production in the myocardium during the following sustained ischaemia. However, in isolated cardiomyocytes, adenosine levels during sustained ischaemia were lower in ischaemically preconditioned cells compared with the respective non-preconditioned cardiomyocytes. 6. The increase in adenosine production was not observed in hearts preconditioned with phenylephrine instead of transient ischaemia. Similarly, pharmacological preconditioning resulted in decreased adenosine levels during sustained ischaemia in isolated cardiomyocytes. 7. Intracellular pH was preserved during ischaemia to the same extent in both ischaemically or pharmacologically preconditioned hearts and cardiomyocytes, indicating that less acidosis during ischaemia is related to protection. 8. Taken together, the results suggest that cardioprotection does not necessarily correlate with increased adenosine production. Thus, adenosine concentration is not crucial to the beneficial effects of preconditioning in rat heart.

New mechanism of action for cilostazol: interplay between adenosine and cilostazol in inhibiting platelet activation

Cilostazol, a potent phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor and anti-thrombotic agent, was recently shown to inhibit adenosine uptake into cardiac myocytes and vascular cells. In the present studies, cilostazol inhibited [ H]-adenosine uptake in both platelets and erythrocytes with a median inhibitory concentration (IC ) of 7 micro M. Next collagen-induced platelet aggregation was studied and it was found that adenosine (1 micro M ), having no effect by itself, shifted the IC of cilostazol from 2.66 micro M to 0.38 micro M (p < 0.01). This shifting was due to an enhanced accumulation of cAMP in platelets and was significantly larger than that by the combination of adenosine and milrinone, which has no effect on adenosine uptake. Similarly, cilostazol, by blocking adenosine uptake, enhanced the adenosine-mediated cAMP increase in Chinese hamster ovary cells that overexpress human A receptor. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of cilostazol on platelet aggregation in whole blood was significantly reversed by ZM241385 (100 n ), an A adenosine receptor antagonist, and by adenosine deaminase (2 U/ml). These data suggest that the inhibitory effects of cilostazol on adenosine uptake and phosphodiesterase 3 together elevate intracellular cAMP, resulting in greater inhibition of agonist-induced platelet activation.

Pharmacological modulation, preclinical studies, and new clinical features of myocardial ischemic preconditioning

The term "ischemic preconditioning (PC)" was first applied to canine myocardium subjected to brief episodes of ischemia and reperfusion that tolerated a more prolonged episode of ischemia better than myocardium not previously exposed to ischemia. Protective effect of myocardial ischemic PC was demonstrated in several animal species, resulting in the strongest endogenous form of protection against myocardial injury, jeopardized myocardium, infarct size, and arrhythmias other than early reperfusion. New onset angina before acute myocardial infarction, episodes of myocardial ischemia during coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery, and the "warm-up" phenomenon may represent clinical counterparts of the PC phenomenon in humans. Here, we have attempted to summarize pharmacological modulation, preclinical studies, and new clinical features of ischemic PC. To date, the pathophysiological basis of the "chemical PC" is still not well established, and "putting PC in a bottle" for clinical applications still remains a new pharmacological venture.

Cardioprotective effects of nicorandil in rabbits anaesthetized with halothane: potentiation of ischaemic preconditioning via KATP channels

1. The roles of ATP-sensitive K+ channels (KATP channels) in ischaemic or pharmacological preconditioning in the rabbit heart remain unclear. Infarct limitation by ischaemic preconditioning was abolished by the KATP channel blocker glibenclamide under ketamine/xylazine anaesthesia, but not under anaesthesia induced by pentobarbital. Infarct limitation by the KATP channel opener pinacidil was detected under ketamine/xylazine anaesthesia, but not under pentobarbital anaesthesia. Thus, these effects appear to be anaesthetic dependent. 2. In the present study, we examined whether nicorandil (a KATP channel opener nitrate) exhibits cardioprotective actions under halothane anaesthesia, another commonly used volatile anaesthetic. Control animals were subjected to 40 min coronary occlusion and 120 min reperfusion. Before 40 min ischaemia, the nicorandil group received nicorandil (100 microg/kg per min, i.v., for 10 min), the 5' preconditioning (PC) group received 5 min ischaemia/20 min reperfusion, the 2.5'PC group received 2.5 min preconditioning ischaemia/20 min reperfusion, the nicorandil +2.5'PC group received both nicorandil and 2.5 min ischaemia/20 min reperfusion, the nicorandil +2.5'PC + 5-hydroxydecanoate (5HD) group received both nicorandil and 2.5 min ischaemia/20 min reperfusion in the presence of 5-hydroxydecanoate (5HD; a KATP blocker) and the 5HD group received 5 mg/kg, i.v., 5HD alone. Myocardial infarct size in control (n = 7), nicorandil (n = 5), 5'PC (n = 8), 2.5'PC (n = 5), nicorandil + 2.5'PC (n = 5), nicorandil + 2.5'PC + 5HD (n = 5) and 5HD (n = 4) groups averaged 44.4 +/- 3.6, 41.7 +/- 5.7, 17.8 +/- 3.2,* 34.1 +/- 4.8, 21.3 +/- 4.2,* 39.1 +/- 5.6 and 38.9 +/- 5.0% of the area at risk, respectively (*P <0.05 vs control). 3. Thus, nicorandil alone did not have an infarct size-limiting effect in halothane-anaesthetized rabbits. However, the results suggest that even when nicorandil alone does not demonstrate a direct cardioprotective effect, it may enhance ischaemic preconditioning via KATP channels. Key words: ATP-sensitive K+ (KATP) channel, ischaemic preconditioning, myocardial infarction, nicorandil, rabbit.

Inhibition of adenosine uptake and augmentation of ischemia-induced increase of interstitial adenosine by cilostazol, an agent to treat intermittent claudication

Cilostazol (Pletal), a quinolinone derivative with a cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase type 3 (PDE3) inhibitory activity, was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of symptoms of intermittent claudication (IC). However, the underlying mechanisms of action are not entirely clear. In this study, we showed that cilostazol inhibited adenosine uptake into cardiac ventricular myocytes, coronary artery smooth muscle, and endothelial cells with a median effective concentration (EC50) approximately 10 microM. In vivo, cilostazol increased cardiac interstitial adenosine levels after a 2-min ischemia in rabbit hearts (329 +/- 92% increase vs. 102 +/- 29% ischemia alone). The combination of cilostazol and 2-min ischemia reduced infarction from subsequent 30-min regional ischemia and 3 h of reperfusion (infarct size was 18 +/- 4% vs. 53 +/- 3% in the hearts with 2-min ischemia alone or 48 +/- 2% in the hearts treated with cilostazol alone). In contrast, milrinone had no effect on either adenosine uptake or interstitial adenosine levels. These data show that cilostazol, unlike milrinone, inhibits adenosine uptake, and thus potentiates adenosine accumulation from a 2-min ischemia. Future studies are needed to investigate the role of adenosine in the treatment of IC by cilostazol.

Relationship between free radicals and adenosine in the mechanism of preconditioning: are they interrelated or independent triggers?

Both free radicals (FRs) and adenosine receptor activation contribute to triggering a mechanism of preconditioning (PC) against infarction. This study examined the possibility that there is some interaction between FRs and adenosine generation during PC. In the first series of experiments, the effects of an FR scavenger, N-2-mercaptopropionyl glycine (MPG), on the interstitial adenosine level during PC and on the infarct size-limiting effect of PC were assessed in the rabbit heart in situ. PC with 5-min ischemia/5-min reperfusion limited infarct size after 30-min coronary occlusion (expressed as a percentage of area at risk, %IS/AR) from 33.2 +/- 4.7% (S.E.) to 10.8 +/- 1.1% (p < 0.05). This cardioprotection was blocked by MPG (1.5 mg/kg/min i.v.) infused before and during PC (%IS/AR = 27.4 +/- 3.6). However, the same dose of MPG did not suppress elevation of the adenosine and inosine levels in the microdialysate from the myocardium during 5-min ischemia/reperfusion. In the second series of experiments, the effect of an FR-generating system (1 mM hypoxanthine and 20 mU/ml xanthine oxidase) on the purine production was compared to that of PC in isolated rabbit hearts. Whereas PC increased the adenosine level in the coronary effluent from 0.17 +/- 0.16 microM under baseline to 1.68 +/- 0.53 microM, infusion of the FR generators over a period of 5 min did not increase the adenosine release. However, infarct size was similarly reduced by PC and by 5-min transient infusion of FR generators, and the cardioprotection by the FR generators was abolished by 300 microM MPG. These results suggest that there is no interaction between free radicals and adenosine during the trigger phase of PC in the rabbit heart.

Clinical effects of ischemic preconditioning

A variety of experimental studies have confirmed that preconditioning the myocardium by brief periods of ischemia represents a powerful cardioprotective effect resulting in a reduction of infarct size. After 15 years of research in the experimental laboratory, some evidence shows the existence of preconditioning in human patients with coronary artery disease: repeated balloon inflations before coronary angioplasty induce preconditioning-like effects; moreover, some studies demonstrate better clinical outcome in patients with angina before acute myocardial infarction, resembling a preconditioning effect. So far, a few drugs have been identified as potential mediators of preconditioning, e.g., adenosine, adenosine receptor agonists, and adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channel openers. Before coronary angioplasty and heart surgery, these preconditioning mimetics might be used to protect myocardial tissue by means of preconditioning. Further research is required before preconditioning mimetics could be used for therapy in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia. Possible antipreconditioning effects of several drugs, e.g., sulfonylurea drugs have to be considered in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease.

Adenosine and preconditioning revisited

1. Myocardial tolerance against infarction is substantially increased by exposing myocytes to 3-10 min transient ischaemia. In this phenomenon, termed 'preconditioning', the adenosine receptor is one of the redundant triggers and the best characterized factor in the cardioprotective mechanism. 2. An increase in interstitial adenosine during preconditioning is thought to be derived primarily from hydrolysis of 5'-AMP in the myocyte by cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase, although a contribution of ectosolic 5'-nucleotidase remains controversial. Adenosine production during ischaemia is substantially suppressed in the preconditioned myocardium, probably due to a decrease in ATP utilization. 3. The adenosine receptor needs to be activated not only at the time of preconditioning ischemia, but also during ischaemic insult for the preconditioning to be cardioprotective. However, the extent of cardioprotection afforded by preconditioning is primarily determined by the interstitial adenosine level achieved during preconditioning ischaemia, not by the level during sustained ischaemia. These data suggest that a post-receptor mechanism downstream of the adenosine receptor may be up-regulated after preconditioning. 4. Studies in vitro suggest that the subtypes of adenosine receptor relevant to preconditioning against infarction are A1 and A3, the activation of which appears to provide additive protection. The functional interrelationship between these subtypes in vivo remains unknown. 5. An important step downstream of adenosine receptor activation is protein kinase C (PKC), which facilitates opening of ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels, probably leading to enhancement of myocardial tolerance. However, activation of other protein kinases, such as tyrosine kinase, may also be important in preconditioning, depending on the animal species and preconditioning protocols. The PKC isoform and location of KATP channels (i.e. sarcolemmal vs mitochondrial KATP) that induce anti-infarct tolerance in myocytes remain to be identified.