Emergency room thoracotomy for penetrating cardiac injuries

Penetrating cardiac injuries: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Despite significant advances in trauma surgery in recent years, patients sustaining penetrating cardiac injuries still have an overall survival rate of 19%. A substantial number of deaths occur at the scene, while approximately 40% of those reaching trauma centers survive. To increase survival, the key factor is timely intervention for bleeding control, pericardial tamponade release, and definitive repair. Asymptomatic patients sustaining precordial wounds or mediastinal gunshot wounds should be assessed with chest ultrasound to rule out cardiac injuries. Shock on admission is an immediate indication of surgery repair. Patients admitted in posttraumatic cardiac arrest may benefit from resuscitative thoracotomy. The surgical team must be assured that appropriate personnel, equipment, instruments, and blood are immediately available in the operating room. A left anterolateral thoracotomy, which can be extended to a clamshell incision, and sternotomy are the most common surgical incisions. Identification of cardiac anatomical landmarks during surgery is vital to avoid complications. There are several technical options for bleeding control, and the surgeon must be trained to use them to obtain optimal results. Ultimately, prioritizing surgical intervention and using effective resuscitation strategies are essential for improving survival rates and outcomes.

Evolving Challenges in Prehospital Trauma Services: Current Issues and Suggested Evaluation Tools

For the past two decades, prehospital trauma care has been addressed almost generically in terms of the related approaches to epidemiology, research, and management. However, evolving directions in research have helped emergency medical services (EMS) practitioners to delineate more focused treatment strategies according to the mechanism of injury, anatomic involvement, and the patient's clinical condition. Recent studies in the areas of trauma-associated circulatory arrest, severe blunt head injury, and post-traumatic hemorrhage following penetrating truncal injury suggest that current standard approaches to patient care should be reconsidered. In turn, this need for re-examination of trauma management strategies calls for the development of appropriate evaluation tools within EMS systems. Proper research design is dependent upon several key issues including: 1) the type of study (system study versus examination of a specific intervention); 2), the population under study; 3) physiological and anatomical scoring method; 4) prospective definitions of interventions and meaningful outcome variables (both morbidity and mortality; 5) relative outcome compared to known standards; and 6) prospective determination of statistical requirements.

Cardiac trauma

The first description of a cardiac injury is found in The Iliad. Cardiac injuries are one of the most challenging injuries, requiring immediate surgical intervention, excellent surgical skills and critical care. The clinical presentation of penetrating cardiac injuries has a broad range, from haemodynamic stability to cardio-pulmonary arrest. Two-dimensional echocardiography is now the procedure of choice over subxiphoid pericardial window to evaluate for the presence of these injuries. Emergency department thoracotomy is indicated for management of penetrating cardiac injuries with immediate cardiography, aortic cross-clamping and open cardiac massage. The left anterolateral thoracotomy is the incision of choice for patients that arrive in extremis. The repair of the wounds should be performed according to the anatomy of the injured area. Mortality remains high, although better patient selection according to physiologic scoring leads to increase in survival.

Resuscitative thoracotomy

Resuscitative thoracotomy is often performed on trauma patients with thoracoabdominal penetrating or blunt injuries arriving in cardiac arrest. The goal of this procedure is to immediately restore cardiac output and to control major hemorrhage within the thorax and abdominal cavity. Only surgeons with experience in the management of cardiac and thoracic injuries should perform this procedure.

An evidence-based approach to patient selection for emergency department thoracotomy: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

BACKGROUND

Within the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework, we performed a systematic review and developed evidence-based recommendations to answer the following PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes) question: should patients who present pulseless after critical injuries (with and without signs of life after penetrating thoracic, extrathoracic, or blunt injuries) undergo emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) (vs. resuscitation without EDT) to improve survival and neurologically intact survival?

METHODS

All patients who underwent EDT were included while those involving either prehospital resuscitative thoracotomy or operating room thoracotomy were excluded. Quantitative synthesis via meta-analysis was not possible because no comparison or control group (i.e., survival or neurologically intact survival data for similar patients who did not undergo EDT) was available for the PICO questions of interest.

RESULTS

The 72 included studies provided 10,238 patients who underwent EDT. Patients presenting pulseless after penetrating thoracic injury had the most favorable EDT outcomes both with (survival, 182 [21.3%] of 853; neurologically intact survival, 53 [11.7%] of 454) and without (survival, 76 [8.3%] of 920; neurologically intact survival, 25 [3.9%] of 641) signs of life. In patients presenting pulseless after penetrating extrathoracic injury, EDT outcomes were more favorable with signs of life (survival, 25 [15.6%] of 160; neurologically intact survival, 14 [16.5%] of 85) than without (survival, 4 [2.9%] of 139; neurologically intact survival, 3 [5.0%] of 60). Outcomes after EDT in pulseless blunt injury patients were limited with signs of life (survival, 21 [4.6%] of 454; neurologically intact survival, 7 [2.4%] of 298) and dismal without signs of life (survival, 7 [0.7%] of 995; neurologically intact survival, 1 [0.1%] of 825).

CONCLUSION

We strongly recommend that patients who present pulseless with signs of life after penetrating thoracic injury undergo EDT. We conditionally recommend EDT for patients who present pulseless and have absent signs of life after penetrating thoracic injury, present or absent signs of life after penetrating extrathoracic injury, or present signs of life after blunt injury. Lastly, we conditionally recommend against EDT for pulseless patients without signs of life after blunt injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review/guideline, level III.

Damage-control techniques in the management of severe lung trauma

BACKGROUND

Damage control (DC) has improved survival from severe abdominal and extremity injuries. The data on the surgical strategies and outcomes in patients managed with DC for severe thoracic injuries are scarce.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of patients treated with DC for thoracic/pulmonary complex trauma at two Level I trauma centers from 2006 to 2010. Subjects 14 years and older were included. Demographics, trauma characteristics, surgical techniques, and resuscitation strategies were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 840 trauma thoracotomies were performed. DC thoracotomy (DCT) was performed in 31 patients (3.7%). Pulmonary trauma was found in 25 of them. The median age was 28 years (interquartile range [IQR], 20-34 years), Revised Trauma Score (RTS) was 7.11 (IQR, 5.44-7.55), and Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 26 (IQR, 25-41). Nineteen patients had gunshot wounds, four had stab wounds, and two had blunt trauma.Pulmonary trauma was managed by pneumorrhaphy in 3, tractotomy in 12, wedge resection in 1, and packing as primary treatment in 8 patients. Clamping of the pulmonary hilum was used as a last resource in seven patients. Five patients returned to the intensive care unit with the pulmonary hilum occluded by a vascular clamp or an en masse ligature. These patients underwent a deferred resection within 16 hours to 90 hours after the initial DCT. Four of them survived.Bleeding from other intrathoracic sources was found in 20 patients: major vessels in nine, heart in three, and thoracic wall in nine.DCT mortality in pulmonary trauma was 6 (24%) of 25 because of coagulopathy, or persistent bleeding in 5 patients and multiorgan failure in 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

This series describes our experience with DCT in severe lung trauma. We describe pulmonary hilum clamping and deferred lung resection as a viable surgical alternative for major pulmonary injuries and the use of packing as a definitive method for hemorrhage control.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Epidemiologic study, level V.

Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma: resuscitative thoracotomy

BACKGROUND

In the past three decades, there has been a significant clinical shift in the performance of resuscitative thoracotomy (RT), from a nearly obligatory procedure before declaring any trauma patient deceased to a more selective application of RT. We have sought to formulate an evidence-based guideline for the current indications for RT after injury in the patient.

METHODS

The Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions Committee queried the literature for studies defining the appropriate role of RT in the trauma patient. When good data were not available, the Committee relied on expert opinion.

RESULTS

There are no published PRCT and it is not likely that there will be; recommendations are based on published prospective observational and retrospective studies, as well as expert opinion of Western Trauma Association members. Patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on arrival to the hospital should be stratified based on injury and transport time. Indications for RT include the following: blunt trauma patients with less than 10 minutes of prehospital CPR, penetrating torso trauma patients with less than 15 minutes of CPR, patients with penetrating trauma to the neck or extremity with less than 5 minutes of prehospital CPR, and patients in profound refractory shock. After RT, the patient's intrinsic cardiac activity is evaluated; patients in asystole without cardiac tamponade are declared dead. Patients with a cardiac wound, tamponade, and associated asystole are aggressively treated. Patients with an intrinsic rhythm following RT should be treated according to underlying primary pathology. Following several minutes of such treatment as well as generalized resuscitation, salvageability is reassessed; we define this as the patient's ability to generate a systolic blood pressure of greater than 70 mm Hg with an aortic cross-clamp if necessary.

CONCLUSION

The success of RT approximates 35% for the patient arriving in shock with a penetrating cardiac wound and 15% for all patients with penetrating wounds. Conversely, patient outcome is relatively poor when RT is performed for blunt trauma, 2% survival for patients in shock and less than 1% survival for patients with no vital signs. Patients undergoing CPR on arrival to the hospital should be stratified based on injury and transport time to determine the utility of RT. This algorithm represents a rational approach that could be followed at trauma centers with the appropriate resources; it may not be applicable at all hospitals caring for the injured. There will be patient, personnel, institutional, and situational factors that may warrant deviation from the recommended guideline. The annotated algorithm is intended to serve as a quick bedside reference for clinicians.

Appropriate use of emergency department thoracotomy: implications for the thoracic surgeon

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines for the appropriate use of emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) according to current national resuscitative guidelines have been developed by the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) and published. At an urban level I trauma center we analyzed how closely these guidelines were followed and their ability to predict mortality.

METHODS

Between January 2003 and July 2010, 120 patients with penetrating thoracic trauma underwent EDT at Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH). Patients were separated based on adherence (group 1, n=70) and nonadherence (group 2, n=50) to current resuscitative guidelines, and group survival rates were determined. These 2 groups were analyzed based on outcome to determine the effect of a strict policy of adherence on survival.

RESULTS

Of EDTs performed during the study period, 41.7% (50/120) were considered outside current guidelines. Patients in group 2 were less likely to have traditional predictors of survival. There were 6 survivors in group 1 (8.7%), all of whom were neurologically intact; there were no neurologically intact survivors in group 2 (p=0.04). The presence of a thoracic surgeon in the operating room (OR) was associated with increased survival (p=0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

A policy of strict adherence to EDT guidelines based on current national guidelines would have accounted for all potential survivors while avoiding the harmful exposure of health care personnel to blood-borne pathogens and the futile use of resources for trauma victims unable to benefit from them. Cardiothoracic surgeons should be familiar with current EDT guidelines because they are often asked to contribute their operative skills for those patients who survive to reach the OR.

[Emergency thoracotomy. Indications, surgical technique and results]

Emergency thoracotomy is a surgical technique that has been extended in the last few years, and is currently included in advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation protocols. Despite its proven use in patients with penetrating heart wounds, it is often not used due to lack of knowledge of the technique. Currently, the increase in chest wounds due to violence, traffic accidents, crashes or suicides, and advances in extra-hospital medical care systems, has currently awakened new interest in this technique. A review of emergency thoracotomy is presented in this article: indications, surgical technique, results, and its usefulness in the extra-hospital setting.

Emergency department thoracotomy for penetrating injuries of the heart and great vessels: an appraisal of 283 consecutive cases from two urban trauma centers

BACKGROUND

Historically, patients with penetrating cardiac injuries have enjoyed the best survival after emergency department thoracotomy (EDT), but further examination of these series reveals a preponderance of cardiac stab wound (SW) survivors with only sporadic cardiac gunshot wound (GSW) survivors. Our primary study objective was to determine which patients requiring EDT for penetrating cardiac or great vessel (CGV) injury are salvageable.

METHODS

All patients who underwent EDT for penetrating CGV injuries in two urban, level I trauma centers during 2000 to 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, injury (mechanism, anatomic injury), prehospital care, and physiology (signs of life [SOL], vital signs, and cardiac rhythm) were analyzed with respect to hospital survival.

RESULTS

The study population (n = 283) comprised young (mean age, 27.1 years +/- 10.1 years) men (96.1%) injured by gunshot (GSW, 88.3%) or SWs (11.7%). Patients were compared by injury mechanism and number of CGV wounds with respect to survival (SW, 24.2%; GSW, 2.8%; p < 0.001; single, 9.5%; multiple, 1.4%; p = 0.003). Three predictors-injury mechanism, ED SOL, and number of CGV wounds-were then analyzed alone and in combination with respect to hospital survival. Only one patient (0.8%) with multiple CGV GSW survived EDT.

CONCLUSION

When the cumulative impact of penetrating injury mechanism, ED SOL, and number of CGV wounds was analyzed together, we established that those sustaining multiple CGV GSWs (regardless of ED SOL) were nearly unsalvageable. These results indicate that when multiple CGV GSWs are encountered after EDT, further resuscitative efforts may be terminated without limiting the opportunity for survival.

Toracotomia de reanimação: racionalização do uso do procedimento

OBJETIVO: Contesta-se a aplicação indiscriminada da toracotomia de reanimação (TR) no trauma. Este estudo objetiva reavaliar as indicações de TR na nossa instituição. MÉTODO: Estudo retrospectivo envolvendo 126 pacientes submetidos à TR entre janeiro de 1995 e dezembro de 2004. Definiram-se quatro grupos considerando os sinais vitais dos pacientes na admissão: morto ao chegar, fatal, agônico e choque profundo. O protocolo incluiu dados como mecanismo de trauma, sinais vitais, Escore de Trauma Revisado (Revised Trauma Score ou RTS), locais de lesão (identificados durante cirurgia ou autópsia), Índice de Gravidade da Lesão (Injury Severity Score ou ISS) e sobrevida. RESULTADOS: Setenta e dois (57,2%) pacientes apresentavam ferimento por projétil de arma de fogo, 11 (8,7%) ferimento por arma branca e 43 (34,1%) por trauma fechado. Nenhum dos sessenta pacientes (47,6%) dos grupos fatal e morto ao chegar sobreviveu, mas 13 (39,4%) dos pacientes fatais foram encaminhados ao centro cirúrgico (CC) para tratamento definitivo. Dos 66 pacientes dos grupos agônico e choque profundo, 44 (66,7%) foram submetidos a TR no prontosocorro (PS) e 31 (70,5%) destes foram transferidos até o CC. Nos 22 restantes, a parada cardiorrespiratória ocorreu já no CC, onde foi feita a TR. Dois pacientes do grupo choque profundo sobreviveram (1,6% do total) e receberam alta com função cerebral normal. O ISS médio foi 33, sendo exsangüinação a causa mais freqüente de óbito. CONCLUSÕES: Resultados ruins enfatizam a necessidade de uma abordagem mais seletiva para aplicar a TR. Um algoritmo baseado no mecanismo de trauma e nos sinais vitais na admissão é proposto para otimizar as indicações de TR.

Emergency department thoracotomy for the critically injured patient: Objectives, indications, and outcomes

In the past three decades there has been a significant clinical shift in the performance of emergency department thoracotomy (EDT), from a nearly obligatory procedure before declaring any trauma patient to select patients undergoing EDT. The value of EDT in resuscitation of the patient in profound shock but not yet dead is unquestionable. Its indiscriminate use, however, renders it a low-yield and high-cost procedure. Overall analysis of the available literature indicates that the success of EDT approximates 35% in the patient arriving in shock with a penetrating cardiac wound, and 15% for all penetrating wounds. Conversely, patient outcome is relatively poor when EDT is done for blunt trauma; 2% survival in patients in shock and less than 1% survival with no vital signs. Patients undergoing CPR upon arrival to the emergency department should be stratified based upon injury and transport time to determine the utility of EDT. The optimal application of EDT requires a thorough understanding of its physiologic objectives, technical maneuvers, and the cardiovascular and metabolic consequences.

Survival after emergency department thoracotomy: review of published data from the past 25 years

BACKGROUND

Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) has become standard therapy for patients who acutely arrest after injury. Patient selection is vitally important to achieve optimal outcomes without wasting valuable resources. The aim of this study was to determine the main factors that most influence survival after EDT.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-four studies that included 4,620 cases from institutions that reported EDT for both blunt and penetrating trauma during the past 25 years were reviewed. The primary outcomes analyzed were in-hospital survival rates.

RESULTS

EDT had an overall survival rate of 7.4%. Normal neurologic outcomes were noted in 92.4% of surviving patients. Factors reported as influencing outcomes were the mechanism of injury (MOI), location of major injury (LOMI), and signs of life (SOL). Survival rates for MOI were 8.8% for penetrating injuries and 1.4% for blunt injuries. When penetrating injuries were further separated, the survival rates were 16.8% for stab wounds and 4.3% for gunshot wounds. For the LOMI, survival rates were 10.7% for thoracic injuries, 4.5% for abdominal injuries, and 0.7% for multiple injuries. If the LOMI was the heart, the survival rate was the highest at 19.4%. The third factor influencing outcomes was SOL. If SOL were present on arrival at the hospital, survival rate was 11.5% in contrast to 2.6% if none were present. SOL present during transport resulted in a survival rate of 8.9%. Absence of SOL in the field yielded a survival rate of 1.2%. There was no clear single independent preoperative factor that could uniformly predict death.

CONCLUSIONS

The best survival results are seen in patients who undergo EDT for thoracic stab injuries and who arrive with SOL in the emergency department. All three factors-MOI, LOMI, and SOL-should be taken into account when deciding whether to perform EDT. Uniform reporting guidelines are needed to further elucidate the role of EDT taking into account the combination of MOI, LOMI, and SOL.

[Thoracic stab wounds]

Stab wounds are the most common cause of open chest wounds in our setting, with an incidence far higher than either wounds caused by firearms or bull horns. We describe a series of 49 patients, 44 (89.8%) men and 5 (10.2%) women. Mean age was 31 years. The 49 patients had suffered 72 stab wounds to the chest, of which 30 (41.6%) were penetrating and 42 (58.3%) were non penetrating. The lesions observed were 11 (22.4%) cases of pneumothorax, 10 (20.4%) of hemopneumothorax, 6 pulmonary lesions, 2 heart wounds and 1 extensively damaged diaphragm. Twenty-four patients with non penetrating wounds and 8 with penetrating wounds were treated conservatively. It was subsequently necessary to drain the chest of only one. Of the remaining penetrating wounds, drains were inserted in six immediately and 11 underwent surgery. Complications developed in only 9 cases. One patient died as a result of abdominal lesions resulting from stab wounds directly to the abdomen. We are in favor of conservative management. Indications for more aggressive intervention are hypovolemic shock, cardiac tamponade or significant loss of fluid through the thoracic drain.

Penetrating cardiac injuries

Penetrating cardiac injuries pose a tremendous challenge to any trauma surgeon. Time, sound judgment, aggressive intervention, and surgical technique are the most important factors contributing to positive outcomes. This article extensively reviews the history, surgical management, and techniques needed to deal with these critical injuries. This year commemorates the one hundredth anniversary of the first successful repair of a cardiac injury.

Right lung ventilation in a porcine open-chest shock model

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of selective right lung ventilation on gas exchange and hemodynamics when compared with bilateral lung ventilation in a porcine open-chest shock model.

METHODS

A randomized, controlled laboratory investigation was performed using a static hemorrhagic shock model in 12 adult swine undergoing thoracotomy. The animals were subjected to a fixed 40% circulating blood volume hemorrhage over 20 minutes. Each animal was then assigned to either a tracheal (control) or a right mainstem (experimental) intubation group. Minute ventilation was held constant in both groups and tidal volumes were decreased by 33% in the right mainstem intubation group. Following intubation and left lateral thoracotomy, another 20% fixed-volume hemorrhage was instituted simultaneously with IV crystalloid and whole blood resuscitation for both groups over 30 minutes. Heart rate, blood pressure, and arterial blood gases were measured at 5-minute intervals.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the control and experimental groups for any of the measured variables, including mean arterial pressure, pH, partial arterial pressure of CO2 (PaCO2), and PaO2, over time. All animals survived the study protocol.

CONCLUSION

Selective right lung ventilation has no detrimental effect on gas exchange or hemodynamics when compared with standard bilateral lung ventilation in a porcine open-chest shock model.

Evaluation of subxiphoid pericardial window used in the detection of occult cardiac injury

We critically evaluated several diagnostic modalities (clinical criteria, subxiphoid pericardial window (SPW) and laparoscopy) used in the detection of occult cardiac injury in haemodynamically stable patients at high risk of cardiac injury. Over 5 years, 122 patients were admitted to a Level I trauma centre with such an injury. They sustained 69 stab wounds, and 53 gunshot wounds. Sites of penetration were: precordial (81), right chest (25), lateral chest (13), thoracoabdominal (40) and abdominal (19). Vital signs in the emergency room were (mean +/- SD): systolic BP, 111 +/- 23.2 mmHg; HR, 106 +/- 18.7; GCS, 13.6 +/- 1.3; and CVP, 17 +/- 7.8 cmH2O. SPW was performed in all patients and was positive for haemopericardium in 26 patients, 24 (92 per cent) of whom had a cardiac injury at operation. Two patients had pericardial lacerations without cardiac injury. In addition, 14 patients with lower precordial and thoracoabdominal wounds underwent laparoscopy. At laparoscopy, the pericardium was evaluated by transdiaphragmatic inspection in 10 patients. The presence (two) or absence (eight) of blood within the pericardium was accurately predicted and verified by SPW. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis of clinical data failed to reveal any significant predictor of cardiac injury. SPW remains the standard means of diagnosing occult cardiac injury in high-risk patients. Since the incidence of occult cardiac injury in haemodynamically stable patients is 20 per cent, SPW should be used liberally. Laparoscopy may have a role in evaluating the pericardium in the subgroup of patients with lower chest wounds, and it facilitates inspection of intra-abdominal viscera and diaphragm at the same time.

Emergency department echocardiography improves outcome in penetrating cardiac injury

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of immediate two-dimensional echocardiography on the time to diagnosis, survival rate, and neurologic outcome of patients with penetrating cardiac injury.

DESIGN

A ten-year retrospective review.

SETTING

Regional trauma center serving a population base of 1.25 million with 85,000 visits yearly.

TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS

All patients presenting to the emergency department with penetrating cardiac injury.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The records of 49 patients with penetrating cardiac injury were reviewed. Of these, 28 received immediate two-dimensional echocardiography in the ED (echo group) and 21 did not (nonecho group). The probability of survival was derived using TRISS methodology. Differences between groups were determined using either the two sample t-test for parametric data or the Mann-Whitney test for nonparametric data. The overall probability of survival was 33.2%, and the actual survival rate was 81.6%. The probability of survival was 34.2% and 31.8% for the echo group and nonecho group, respectively. The actual survival was 100% in the echo group and 57.1% in the nonecho group. The average time to diagnosis and disposition for surgical intervention was 15.5 +/- 11.4 minutes for the echo group and 42.4 +/- 21.7 minutes for the nonecho group (P less than .001). The Glasgow Outcome Score was 5.0 for the echo group and 4.2 for the nonecho group (P = .007).

CONCLUSION

Since the introduction of immediate ED two-dimensional echocardiography, the time to diagnosis of penetrating cardiac injury has decreased and both the survival rate and neurologic outcome of survivors has improved.

Demography of penetrating cardiac trauma

All cases of penetrating cardiac trauma in 1985 and 1986 in Jefferson County, Alabama, where patients dying of penetrating trauma received autopsies, were retrospectively reviewed. All hospitals in the county plus the single coroner's office provided the records of the 72 patients comprising this study. Incidents occurred most often in the home or residence (70%) by a known assailant (83%) due to domestic/social disputes (73%). Frequency was greatest in the evening hours (73% between 6:00 PM and 3:00 AM), on weekends in spring and summer. Victims tended to be male (86%), black (72%), married (46%), blue collar workers (62%). There were 41 (57%) gunshot wounds, 3 (4%) shotgun wounds, and 28 (39%) stab wounds with an associated mortality rate of 97%, 100%, and 68%, respectively. Prehospital mortality rate (dead at the scene) was 54.2% (39/72), and death on arrival was 26.4% (19/72), for a combined pretreatment mortality rate of 80.6%. All patients who arrived with no vital signs died. Mortality appeared to be related to mechanism of injury, age, race, sex, vital signs on arrival, number and specific cardiac chambers injured, associated major vascular injury, hematocrit, and mode of transportation. Mortality was not related to caliber of weapon, ethanol level, transport time, time from arrival to operation, or transfusion requirements. There were only ten survivors (1 gunshot wound and 9 stab wounds), all of whom had ventricular injuries and no associated major vascular injuries. The ten survivors represented a 71.4% (10/14) salvage rate for those victims arriving with vital signs. Complications occurred in three patients. Hospitalization averaged 7.3 days in the survivors. Penetrating cardiac trauma remains a serious, socially linked disease with a high rate of mortality. Rapid transport, aggressive resuscitation and cardiorrhaphy remain the best treatment.

The injured heart

Penetrating and blunt injuries to the heart, ranging from cardiac concussion to rupture, are seen more and more frequently. Prompt diagnosis because of a high index of suspicion and timely, well-executed resuscitative efforts are rewarded by remarkable survival rates, even in the patients presenting in extremis, whereas hesitancy in diagnosis and therapeutic action militates against a successful result.

Major trauma in an urban New Zealand setting: resource requirements

Patients with severe injuries, place significant demands on an institution's facilities and staff if these patients are to be treated adequately. In the USA, requirements for institutions managing patients with major injuries have been outlined and 'trauma centres' designated. In New Zealand, the requirements for care of patients with severe injuries have not been documented. One hundred and fourteen patients who presented to the Accident and Emergency Department at Auckland Hospital over a 6 month period were prospectively evaluated. All patients had Injury Severity Scores greater than or equal to 16 and the majority were young males. The greatest number of patients presented at night and during the weekend. Radiographic studies and resuscitation room procedures were commonly required and 54% of patients required surgery within the first 24 h after presentation. Management of patients required involvement by a large variety of specialties with general surgery, intensive care, anaesthetics, neurosurgery and orthopaedics more commonly involved. Sixty per cent of patients required intensive care admission and the overall group had a 30% mortality rate. This study confirms that major trauma in New Zealand patients places similar demands on resources to that experienced in the USA. Although health resources are currently limited, appropriate allocation of these resources must be considered to best treat patients suffering severe injuries.

Emergency department thoracotomy for traumatic cardiac arrest

There continues to be a debate on the indications for and value of emergency department thoracotomy, especially with regard to thoracotomies performed by emergency physicians. The current literature does not deal specifically with thoracotomies performed by an emergency physician on trauma patients in full cardiopulmonary arrest in a setting with no immediate surgical backup. This paper reports the results of 6 years of experience by one emergency physician in such a setting involving 80 patients, with a 6% overall survival rate, including two patients who survived blunt traumatic cardiac arrests. This lends support to emergency-physician-performed thoracotomies on trauma patients in "extremis," even in the setting of a hospital with no immediate surgical backup.

Emergency department thoracotomy for trauma: a collective review

A decade of experience with resuscitative thoracotomy for the trauma victim in extremis has been gained since the pioneering efforts of Mattox and his associates in 1974. It appears, from a review of the various reports from different trauma centers, that there is an emergence of a consensus as to the best indications for the procedure. It is generally agreed upon that ERT is fruitless in the patient with severe head trauma or when vital signs were absent at the scene of the injury. In the absence of penetrating thoracic injuries ERT yields a very poor survival in patients without vital signs on admission to the emergency center. It is widely accepted that the best results for ERT are in patients with cardiac tamponade. The prognosis is hopeless in patients without vital signs after sustaining blunt trauma.

Penetrating cardiac trauma. Quantifying the severity of anatomic and physiologic injury

A method of quantifying the anatomic extent of injury to the heart, Penetrating Cardiac Trauma Index, (PCTI) and other thoracic organs has been proposed. The total extent of thoracic injury, Penetrating Thoracic Trauma Index (PTTI), was measured. When associated abdominal injury was present, it was assessed by the Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI) of Moore et al. The severity of total injury sustained by the patient, represented by the Penetrating Trauma Index (PTI), was determined by the sum total of these scores. The extent of physiologic abnormality induced by cardiac penetration, (Physiologic Index or PI), was graded on a scale of increasing severity from 5-20 based on the vital signs of patients on admission. Analysis of 112 patients with penetrating cardiac injuries (1973-1983) revealed that the indices, PCTI and PI, showed an excellent correlation with survival (R2 = 0.827 and 0.928, respectively) as did the total extent of trauma (PTI). A composite prognostic score of the sum of PI and PTI demonstrated a significant separation of survivors from nonsurvivors (p less than 0.001). It is concluded that these anatomic (PCTI and PTI) and physiologic (PI) indices are valid and, with additional confirmation, may provide an objective method of evaluating penetrating cardiac injuries.

Emergency department thoracotomy for penetrating injuries: predictive value of patient classification

In 18 months, 44 patients underwent thoracotomy in an emergency department (ED) for penetrating thoracic injuries. Of 14 patients resuscitated, seven (50%) survived, and all were neurologically intact. Patients were classified according to the quality of signs of life in transit or upon arrival at the ED. Identical survival rates of 29% were noted for patients in Group I (profound shock) and in Group II (agonal), with survival at 14% for individuals in Group III ("dead" on arrival). There were no survivors among patients in Group IV ("dead" on the scene), and ED thoracotomy, in the authors' opinion, is fruitless in this group. In Groups I, II, and III, total salvage from cardiac injuries was six of 24 patients (25%), and for those with non-cardiac injuries, it was one of 11 (9%). The rate of survival from cardiac stab wounds in Groups I, II, and III, was five of 16 (31%) and one of eight (13%) for gunshot wounds. Five of the seven survivors (71%) arrived at the ED by rapid transport without the benefit of any pre-hospital life support. Patient classification appears to be a valuable tool in evaluating the benefit of ED thoracotomy. The neurological status of all survivors and pertinent transportation data should be included in all future studies of ED thoracotomy. "Scoop and run" in the urban setting with rapid transport capability may be superior to pre-hospital stabilization of victims of penetrating thoracic trauma.

Thoracic battle injuries in the Lebanon War: review of the early operative approach in 1,992 patients

The effectiveness of aggressive resuscitation and early surgical intervention is evaluated in 1,992 casualties with thoracic battle wounds in Lebanon. The mechanism of injury was mainly high-velocity missiles and shelling in city battles. Ninety-seven percent of the wounds were penetrating. The mean age of the wounded was 20 years and the average transport, 4.2 km (3 miles). Logistics and newly equipped thoracic centers aided uniform therapy. For decompensating patients or those in critical condition, initial shock was treated with rapid volume expansion, cardiopulmonary support, and urgent thoracotomy. Thoracotomy was required in 1,422 casualties (71%) and definitive tube thoracostomy in 29%. Three hundred ten patients had pulmonary resections: 36 pneumonectomies, 112 lobectomies, and 162 segmental resections. In 627 patients following primary thoracotomy survival was 98.4%. For 456 casualties with additional systemic procedures, survival was 96.9%. For 285 casualties with cardiac injuries, a significant 14% incidence, overall survival was 73%. Survival was best for those with pericardial and coronary vessel wounds and dropped to 46% for those with left ventricular injuries. Survival was 87% among 54 patients with great vessel wounds. Life salvage in 726 (36%) patients was documented to result from early open procedures. Other benefits of this approach are presented in this broad-based study.