Is computed tomographic grading of splenic injury useful in the nonsurgical management of blunt trauma?

Alahmad Y, Jaleel Z, Ahmed Z, Kaassamali R, Hasani AA, Al-Thani H, Omar A. The predictive value of CTSI scoring system in non-operative management of patients with splenic blunt trauma: The experience of a level 1 trauma center

Background

The spleen is one of the most injured organs following blunt abdominal trauma. The management options can be either operative or non-operative management (NOM) with either conservative management or splenic artery embolization. The implementation of CT in emergency departments allowed the use of CT imaging as a primary screening tool in early decision-making. Consecutively, new splenic injury scoring systems, such as the CT severity index (CTSI) reported was established.

Aim

The main aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the implementation of CTSI scoring system on the management decision and outcomes in patients with blunt splenic trauma over 8 years in a level 1 trauma center.

Methods

This is a retrospective study including all adult patients with primary splenic trauma, having NOM and admitted to our hospital between 2013 and 2021.

Results

The analyses were conducted on ninety-nine patients. The average sample age was 32.7 ± 12.3 years old. A total of (63/99) patients had splenic parenchyma injury without splenic vascular injury. There is a statistically significant association between CTSI grade 3 injury and the development of delayed splenic vascular injury (p < 0.05). There is an association between severity of initial CTSI score and the risk of NOM/clinical failure (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest implementing such a system in a level 1 trauma center will further improve the outcome of treatment for splenic blunt trauma. However, CTSI grade 3 is considered an increased risk of NOM failure, and further investigations are necessary to standardize its management.

Validation of the revised 2018 AAST-OIS classification and the CT severity index for prediction of operative management and survival in patients with blunt spleen and liver injuries

Objectives

Non-operative management (NOM) is increasingly utilised in blunt abdominal trauma. The 1994 American Association of Surgery of Trauma grading (1994-AAST) is applied for clinical decision-making in many institutions. Recently, classifications incorporating contrast extravasation such as the CT severity index (CTSI) and 2018 update of the liver and spleen AAST were proposed to predict outcome and guide treatment, but validation is pending.

Methods

CT images of patients admitted 2000–2016 with blunt splenic and hepatic injury were systematically re-evaluated for 1994/2018-AAST and CTSI grading. Diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for prediction of in-hospital mortality. Correlation with treatment strategy was assessed by Cramer V statistics.

Results

Seven hundred and three patients were analysed, 271 with splenic, 352 with hepatic and 80 with hepatosplenic injury. Primary NOM was applied in 83% of patients; mortality was 4.8%. Comparing prediction of mortality in mild and severe splenic injuries, the CTSI (3.1% vs. 10.3%; diagnostic accuracy = 75.4%; DOR = 3.66; p = 0.006) and 1994-AAST (3.3% vs. 10.5%; diagnostic accuracy = 77.9%; DOR = 3.45; p = 0.010) were more accurate compared with the 2018-AAST (3.4% vs. 8%; diagnostic accuracy = 68.2%; DOR = 2.50; p = 0.059). In hepatic injuries, the CTSI was superior to both AAST classifications in terms of diagnostic accuracy (88.7% vs. 77.1% and 77.3%, respectively). CTSI and 2018-AAST correlated better with the need for surgery in severe vs. mild hepatic (Cramer V = 0.464 and 0.498) and splenic injuries (Cramer V = 0.273 and 0.293) compared with 1994-AAST (Cramer V = 0.389 and 0.255; all p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The 2018-AAST and CTSI are superior to the 1994-AAST in correlation with operative treatment in splenic and hepatic trauma. The CTSI outperforms the 2018-AAST in mortality prediction.

Key Points

• Non-operative management of blunt abdominal trauma is increasingly applied and correct patient stratification is crucial.

• CT-based scoring systems are used to assess injury severity and guide clinical decision-making, whereby the 1994 version of the American Association of Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) is currently most commonly utilised.

• Including contrast media extravasation in CT-based grading improves management and outcome prediction. While the 2018-AAST classification and the CT-severity-index (CTSI) better correlate with need for surgery compared to the 1994-AAST, the CTSI is superior in outcome-prediction to the 2018-AAST.

Splenic trauma, the way forward in reducing splenectomy: our 15-year experience

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to study radiological assessment, management and outcome of traumatic splenic injury over 15 years in a UK district general hospital.

METHOD

A retrospective database was established including all splenic injury cases from June 2002 to June 2017 by searching the clinical electronic database. We searched the radiological database for computed tomography reported phrases 'spleen injury', 'laceration', 'haematoma', 'trauma'. We interrogated theatre records for operations coded as splenectomy and cross-referenced this with pathology. Records were reviewed for demographics, vital observations, documentation of American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading of splenic injury, subsequent management and outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 126 patients identified with traumatic splenic injury, with male to female ratio three to one. Operative management was undertaken in 54/126 (43%) patients and selective non-operative management in the remaining. Splenic artery embolisation was undertaken in 5/126 (4%) and 2/126 underwent splenorrhaphy. Computed tomography was undertaken in 109/126 (87%) patients and AAST grading was reported in 18 (17%) patients. AAST grade reporting did not improve significantly when comparing the first 7.5 years with the latter (2/30, 7%; 16/79, 20%), respectively; p = 0.09). Selective non-operative management increased significantly over the studied period (14/34, 42%; 58/93, 62%; p = 0.04). The overall hospital mortality was 10.3%.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

AAST grade reporting of splenic injury has remained sub-optimal over 15 years. Despite progression towards selective non-operative management, operative intervention remained unacceptably high, with splenectomy being the main therapeutic modality. Standardisation through an integrated multidisciplinary diagnostic and management pathway offers the optimal strategy to reduce trauma-induced splenectomy.

Non-operative management of blunt hepatic and splenic injuries-practical aspects and value of radiological scoring systems

Background

Non-operative management (NOM) of blunt hepatic and splenic injuries has become popular in haemodynamically stable adult patients, despite uncertainty about efficacy, patient selection, and details of management. Up-to-date strategies and practical recommendations are presented.

Methods

A selective literature search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library (1989–2016).

Results

No randomized clinical trial was found. Non-randomized controlled trials and large retrospective and prospective series dominate. Few systematic reviews and meta-analyses are available. NOM of selected patients with blunt liver and spleen injuries is associated with low morbidity and mortality. Only data of limited evidence are available on intensity and duration of patient monitoring, repeat imaging, antithrombotic prophylaxis and return to normal activity. There is high-level evidence on early mobilisation and post-splenectomy vaccination.

Conclusion

NOM of blunt liver or spleen injuries is a worldwide trend, but the literature does not provide high-grade evidence for this strategy.

Clinical and Radiological Presentations and Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma: A Single Tertiary Hospital Experience

BACKGROUND Splenic injury is the leading cause of major bleeding after blunt abdominal trauma. We examined the clinical and radiological presentations, management, and outcome of blunt splenic injuries (BSI) in our institution. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study of BSI patients between 2011 and 2014 was conducted. We analyzed and compared management and outcome of different splenic injury grades in trauma patients. RESULTS A total of 191 BSI patients were identified with a mean (SD) age of 26.9 years (13.1); 164 (85.9%) were males. Traffic-related accident was the main mechanism of injury. Splenic contusion and hematoma (77.2%) was the most frequent finding on initial computerized tomography (CT) scans, followed by shattered spleen (11.1%), blush (11.1%), and devascularization (0.6%). Repeated CT scan revealed 3 patients with pseudoaneurysm who underwent angioembolization. Nearly a quarter of patients were managed surgically. Non-operative management failed in 1 patient who underwent splenectomy. Patients with grade V injury presented with higher mean ISS and abdominal AIS, required frequent blood transfusion, and were more likely to be FAST-positive (p=0.001). The majority of low-grade (I-III) splenic injuries were treated conservatively, while patients with high-grade (IV and V) BSI frequently required splenectomy (p=0.001). Adults were more likely to have grade I, II, and V BSI, blood transfusion, and prolonged ICU stay as compared to pediatric BSI patients. The overall mortality rate was 7.9%, which is mainly association with traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock; half of the deaths occurred within the first day after injury. CONCLUSIONS Most BSI patients had grade I-III injuries that were successfully treated non-operatively, with a low failure rate. The severity of injury and presence of associated lesions should be carefully considered in developing the management plan. Thorough clinical assessment and CT scan evaluation are crucial for appropriate management of BSI.

Comparison of MDCT protocols in trauma patients with suspected splenic injury: superior results with protocol that includes arterial and portal venous phase imaging

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine which intravenous contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) protocol produced the most accurate results for the detection of splenic vascular injury in hemodynamically stable patients who had sustained blunt abdominal trauma.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 88 patients from 2003 to 2011 who sustained blunt splenic trauma and underwent contrast-enhanced MDCT and subsequent angiography. Results of MDCT scans utilizing single phase (portal venous only, n=8), dual phase (arterial + portal venous or portal venous + delayed, n=42), or triple phase (arterial + portal venous + delayed, n=38) were compared with results of subsequent splenic angiograms for the detection of splenic vascular injury.

RESULTS

Dual phase imaging was more sensitive and accurate than single phase imaging (P = 0.016 and P = 0.029, respectively). When the subsets of dual phase imaging were compared, arterial + portal venous phase imaging was more sensitive and accurate than portal venous + delayed phase imaging (P = 0.005 and P = 0.002, respectively). Triple phase imaging was more accurate (P = 0.015) than dual phase; however, when compared with the dual phase subset of arterial + portal venous, there was no statistical difference in either sensitivity or accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Our results support the use of dual phase contrast-enhanced MDCT, which includes the arterial phase, in patients with suspected splenic injury and question the utility of obtaining a delayed sequence.

Inter-radiologist agreement for CT scoring of pediatric splenic injuries and effect on an established clinical practice guideline

BACKGROUND

The American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) advocates for the use of a clinical practice guideline to direct management of hemodynamically stable pediatric spleen injuries. The clinical practice guideline is based on the CT score of the spleen injury according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) CT scoring system.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the potential effect of radiologist agreement for CT scoring of pediatric spleen injuries on an established APSA clinical practice guideline.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed blunt splenic injuries occurring in children from January 2007 to January 2012 at a single level 1 trauma center (n = 90). Abdominal CT exams performed at clinical presentation were reviewed by four radiologists who documented the following: (1) splenic injury grade (AAST system), (2) arterial extravasation and (3) pseudoaneurysm. Inter-rater agreement for AAST injury grade was assessed using the multi-rater Fleiss kappa and Kendall coefficient of concordance. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using weighted (AAST injury grade) or prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted (binary measures) kappa statistics; 95% confidence intervals were calculated. We evaluated the hypothetical effect of radiologist disagreement on an established APSA clinical practice guideline.

RESULTS

Inter-rater agreement was good for absolute AAST injury grade (kappa: 0.64 [0.59–0.69]) and excellent for relative AAST injury grade (Kendall w: 0.90). All radiologists agreed on the AAST grade in 52% of cases. Based on an established clinical practice guideline, radiologist disagreement could have changed the decision for intensive care management in 11% (10/90) of children, changed the length of hospital stay in 44% (40/90), and changed the time to return to normal activity in 44% (40/90).

CONCLUSION

Radiologist agreement when assigning splenic AAST injury grades is less than perfect, and disagreements have the potential to change management in a substantial number of pediatric patients.

Pediatric solid organ injury operative interventions and outcomes at Harborview Medical Center, before and after introduction of a solid organ injury pathway for pediatrics

BACKGROUND

Although nonoperative management has become the standard of care for solid organ injury, variability exists in the care patients receive, and there are limited data regarding nonoperative management in patients with high grades of organ injury and substantial overall injury. We aimed to evaluate operative intervention frequency, including splenectomy, and patient outcomes before and after institution of the pediatric solid organ injury pathway at Harborview Medical Center (HMC) in 2005.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at HMC for all pediatric solid organ injury patients from 2001 to 2012. Patients were identified in the Harborview Trauma Registry via DRG International Classification of Diseases-9th Rev. (ICD-9) codes for the presence of liver and spleen injuries. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, and ICD-9 procedure codes were also obtained from the trauma registry. Outcomes including splenectomy, a related abdominal surgery (exploratory laparotomy, spleen or liver repair, or splenectomy), mortality, and length of stay were compared between periods before and after 2005, adjusted for Injury Severity Score (ISS).

RESULTS

The pediatric solid organ injury population at HMC (n = 712) has a high frequency of high-grade injury (35% Grade IV or V) and a high level of overall injury severity (median ISS, 21). Splenectomy was rare and remained stable over time despite an increase in severity of injury (from 2.4% to 0.8%, p = 0.44, among patients with isolated injury and from 4.0% to 3.3%, p = 0.78, among patients with nonisolated injury). Other abdominal surgeries also remained stable over time. Mortality decreased among patients with nonisolated injury (from 11.2% to 4.8%, p = 0.01). Length of stay decreased among patients with isolated organ injury, from a median of 4 days (interquartile range, 3-5 days) to 2 days (interquartile range, 2-3 days) (p < 0.0005) as well as within the lower ISS strata among patients with nonisolated organ injury (from a median of 4 days to 2 days among ISS < 12, p = 0.007; from 5 days to 3 days among ISS of 12-20, p = 0.0001; and from 7 days to 4 days among ISS of 21-33, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Care in the recent period (2005-2012) was associated with a stable, low frequency of splenectomy; decreased mortality for patients with nonisolated injury; and decreased hospital length of stay among most subsets of patients, suggesting improved care despite an increase in patients' severity of injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV; epidemiologic study, level III.

Blunt splenic trauma: Assessment, management and outcomes

BACKGROUND

The approach for diagnosis and management of blunt splenic injury (BSI) has been considerably shifted towards non-operative management (NOM). We aimed to review the current practice for the evaluation, diagnosis and management of BSI.

METHODS

A traditional narrative literature review was carried out using PubMed, MEDLINE and Google scholar search engines. We used the keywords "Traumatic Splenic injury", "Blunt splenic trauma", "management" between December 1954 and November 2014.

RESULTS

Most of the current guidelines support the NOM or minimally approaches in hemodynamically stable patients. Improvement in the diagnostic modalities guide the surgeons to decide the timely management pathway Though, there is an increasing shift from operative management (OM) to NOM of BSI; NOM of high grade injury is associated with a greater rate of failure, prolonged hospital stay, risk of delayed hemorrhage and transfusion-associated infections. Some cases with high grade BSI could be successfully treated conservatively, if clinically feasible, while some patients with lower grade injury might end-up with delayed splenic rupture. Therefore, the selection of treatment modalities for BSI should be governed by patient clinical presentation, surgeon's experience in addition to radiographic findings.

CONCLUSION

About one-fourth of the blunt abdominal trauma accounted for BSI. A high index of clinical suspicion along with radiological diagnosis helps to identify and characterize splenic injuries with high accuracy and is useful for timely decision-making to choose between OM or NOM. Careful selection of NOM is associated with high success rate with a lower rate of morbidity and mortality.

Reliability of injury grading systems for patients with blunt splenic trauma

OBJECTIVES

The most widely used grading system for blunt splenic injury is the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) organ injury scale. In 2007 a new grading system was developed. This 'Baltimore CT grading system' is superior to the AAST classification system in predicting the need for angiography and embolization or surgery. The objective of this study was to assess inter- and intraobserver reliability between radiologists in classifying splenic injury according to both grading systems.

METHODS

CT scans of 83 patients with blunt splenic injury admitted between 1998 and 2008 to an academic Level 1 trauma centre were retrospectively reviewed. Inter and intrarater reliability were expressed in Cohen's or weighted Kappa values.

RESULTS

Overall weighted interobserver Kappa coefficients for the AAST and 'Baltimore CT grading system' were respectively substantial (kappa=0.80) and almost perfect (kappa=0.85). Average weighted intraobserver Kappa's values were in the 'almost perfect' range (AAST: kappa=0.91, 'Baltimore CT grading system': kappa=0.81).

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that overall the inter- and intraobserver reliability for grading splenic injury according to the AAST grading system and 'Baltimore CT grading system' are equally high. Because of the integration of vascular injury, the 'Baltimore CT grading system' supports clinical decision making. We therefore recommend use of this system in the classification of splenic injury.

Multidetector CT of blunt abdominal trauma

The morbidity, mortality, and economic costs resulting from trauma in general, and blunt abdominal trauma in particular, are substantial. The "panscan" (computed tomographic [CT] examination of the head, neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) has become an essential element in the early evaluation and decision-making algorithm for hemodynamically stable patients who sustained abdominal trauma. CT has virtually replaced diagnostic peritoneal lavage for the detection of important injuries. Over the past decade, substantial hardware and software developments in CT technology, especially the introduction and refinement of multidetector scanners, have expanded the versatility of CT for examination of the polytrauma patient in multiple facets: higher spatial resolution, faster image acquisition and reconstruction, and improved patient safety (optimization of radiation delivery methods). In this article, the authors review the elements of multidetector CT technique that are currently relevant for evaluating blunt abdominal trauma and describe the most important CT signs of trauma in the various organs. Because conservative nonsurgical therapy is preferred for all but the most severe injuries affecting the solid viscera, the authors emphasize the CT findings that are indications for direct therapeutic intervention.

Blunt splenic injury in Sikkimese children and adolescents

Background:

The contemplation for the salvage operations and the nonoperative treatment for the pediatric splenic injuries had increasingly been suggested as the standard case management.

Objectives:

The study was carried out to identify the risk factors, the presentations, the severities and outcome of the interventions of blunt splenic injuries in the children and adolescents.

Materials and Methods:

This retrospective review was carried out in a tertiary care hospital in Sikkim on the children and adolescents admitted with splenic injury from January 2005 to December 2009. Splenic injuries were graded with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Splenic Injury Scale followed by the operative and nonoperative managements (NOM).

Results:

Overall 147 cases with the abdominal trauma were diagnosed with splenic injury. Of them, males reported in higher numbers; three-fourths were adolescents with preponderance above 16 years of age. Majority of the cases [n=91(61.90%)] were due to fall from heights and others from road traffic accidents. Immediate surgical interventions was instituted in the hemodynamically unstable cases (n=87) NOM failed in 27 patients; of them eight cases underwent splenectomy, and 19 underwent surgical salvage; 33 were closely followed up by conservative approach with both clinical and CT criteria. Total number of cases in grade III and above was significantly higher than with lower grades of injury.

Conclusions:

In total 95(64.63%) of the cases were managed with total splenectomy; 19 cases in the initial nonsurgical group underwent salvage operation and 33 cases received NOM.

Literature review of the role of ultrasound, computed tomography, and transcatheter arterial embolization for the treatment of traumatic splenic injuries

Introduction

The spleen is the second most frequently injured organ following blunt abdominal trauma. Trends in management have changed over the years. Traditionally, laparotomy and splenectomy was the standard management. Presently, nonoperative management (NOM) of splenic injury is the most common management strategy in hemodynamically stable patients. Splenic injuries can be managed via simple observation (OBS) or with angiography and embolization (AE). Angio-embolization has shown to be a valuable alternative to observational management and has increased the success rate of nonoperative management in many series.

Diagnostics

Improved imaging techniques and advances in interventional radiology have led to a better selection of patients who are amenable to nonoperative management. Despite this, there is still a lot of debate about which patients are prone to NOM.

Angiography and Embolization

The optimal patient selection is still a matter of debate and the role of CT and angio-embolization has not yet fully evolved. We discuss the role of sonography and CT features, such as contrast extravasation, pseudoaneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas, or hemoperitoneum, to determine the optimal patient selection for angiography and embolization. We also review the efficiency, technical considerations (proximal or selective embolization), logistics, and complication rates of AE for blunt traumatic splenic injuries.

Management of pediatric blunt splenic injuries in Canada--practices and opinions

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to compare the self-reported practice patterns of Canadian general surgeons (GSs) and pediatric general surgeons (PGSs) in treating blunt splenic injuries (BSIs) in children.

METHODS

Forty-five PGSs and 690 GSs were surveyed (internet and hard copy). chi(2) was used to compare groups; logistic regression was performed to determine independent factors influencing management variables.

RESULTS

Thirty-three PGSs and 191 GSs completed the survey, for a response rate of 30%. Pediatric general surgeons are more likely than GSs to follow American Pediatric Surgical Association guidelines (52% vs 11%; P < .0001). In diagnosing BSIs, PGSs and GSs are equally likely to use computed tomography (CT) over ultrasound for initial imaging. Pediatric general surgeons are less likely to consider CT injury grade in deciding on nonoperative management (NOM) (odds ratio [OR], 0.2; confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.5; P = .002) and are more likely to continue NOM for patients with contrast blush on CT (OR, 6.5; CI, 2.5-17; P = .0002). Pediatric general surgeons report more selective intensive care unit use, hospital stay, follow-up imaging, and activity restrictions. No differences were found in the management of splenic artery pseudoaneurysms.

CONCLUSION

Differences exist between PGSs and GSs in the management of pediatric BSIs, resulting in higher operative rates, use of resources, and radiation exposure. Further education of GSs in NOM and establishment of management guidelines are indicated.

Computed Tomography Grading Systems Poorly Predict the Need for Intervention after Spleen and Liver Injuries

Computed tomography (CT) grading systems are often used clinically to forecast the need for interventions after abdominal trauma with solid organ injuries. We compared spleen and liver CT grading methods to determine their utility in predicting the need for operative intervention or angiographic embolization. Abdominal CT scans of 300 patients with spleen injuries, liver injuries, or both were evaluated by five trauma faculty members blinded to clinical outcomes. Studies were graded by American Association for the Surgery of Trauma criteria, a novel splenic injury CT grading system, and a novel liver injury grading system. The sensitivity and specificity of each methodology in predicting the need for intervention were calculated. The kappa statistic was used to determine interrater variability. Twenty-one per cent (39/189) of patients with splenic injuries visible on CT scans required interventions, whereas 14 per cent (21/154) of patients with liver injuries visible on CT required interventions. The overall sensitivity of all grading systems in predicting the need for surgery or angioembolization of the spleen or liver was poor; the specificity seemed to be fairly good. When evaluators were compared, the strength of agreement for the various scoring systems was only moderate. Anatomic CT grading systems are ineffective screening tools for excluding the need for operation or embolization after splenic or hepatic trauma. Although insensitive, CT is a good predictor (highly specific) of the need for intervention if certain definitive abnormalities are identified. Considerable inconsistency exists in interpretation of abdominal CT scans after trauma, even among experienced clinicians.

Angioembolization reduces operative intervention for blunt splenic injury

BACKGROUND

Nonoperative management for blunt splenic injury (BSI) has become gold standard, but the role of angiographic embolization (AE) is still controversial for bleeding. We postulated that splenic AE for BSI would have superior outcomes compared with operation and increase our splenic salvage rate.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of all adult trauma patients admitted to our Level I center from 2000 through 2006. Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, Injury Severity Score, and Glasgow Coma Scale score was performed. Only patients who had a computed tomographic (CT) scan before surgery (CT + OR) were compared with those who had CT scans then AE.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven of 317 patients required initial intervention for their BSI, for a no intervention rate (no OR or AE) of 73% and a nonoperative rate of 89%. The groups had similar Injury Severity Score, mortality, and lengths of stay. The AE group was older (p < 0.01), had higher spleen Abbreviated Injury Score (p = 0.02), and required significantly fewer packed RBC transfusions, p < 0.01. The overall hospitalization costs were not different, but the number of intraabdominal complications was higher for the CT + OR group (36% vs. 6%, p < 0.01). Pneumonia, thromboembolic events, and pleural effusions were equivalent. There were no deaths from splenic hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Despite recent concerns that AE may be overutilized for BSI, this study showed a lower incidence of abdominal complications and blood utilization in the AE group despite an older age and higher splenic Abbreviated Injury Score. Use of AE decreased operative intervention by 16%.

Recent changes in the management of blunt splenic injury: effect on splenic trauma patients and hospital implications

INTRODUCTION

Management of blunt splenic injury has been controversial with an increasing trend towards splenic conservation. A retrospective study was performed to identify the effect of this changed policy on splenic trauma patients and its implications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data regarding patient demography, mode of splenic injury, CT grading, blood transfusion requirement, operative findings hospital stay and follow-up were collected. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using nonparametric Mann-Whitney tests

RESULTS

Over an 8-year period, only 21 patients were admitted with blunt splenic injury. Ten patients were managed operatively and 11 non-operatively. Non-operative management failed in one patient due to continued bleeding. Using Buntain's CT grading, the majority of grades I and II splenic injuries were managed non-operatively and grades III and IV were managed operatively ( P = 0.008). Blood transfusion requirement was significantly higher among the operative group (P = 0.004) but the non-operative group had a significantly longer hospital stay (P = 0.029). Among those managed non-operatively (median age, 24.5 years), a number of patients were followed up with CT scans with significant radiation exposure and unknown longterm consequences.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-operative management of blunt splenic trauma in adults can be performed with an acceptable outcome. Although CT is classed as the 'gold standard', initial imaging for detection and evaluation of blunt splenic injury, ultrasound can play a major role in follow-up imaging and potentially avoids major radiation exposure.

Blunt splenic injuries: have we watched long enough?

BACKGROUND

Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injuries (BSIs) has been used with increasing frequency in adult patients. There are currently no definitive guidelines established for how long BSI patients should be monitored for failure of NOM after injury.

METHODS

This study was performed to ascertain the length of inpatient observation needed to capture most failures, and to identify factors associated with failure of NOM. We utilized the National Trauma Data Bank to determine time to failure after BSI.

RESULTS

During the 5-year study period, 23,532 patients were identified with BSI, of which 2,366 (10% overall) were taken directly to surgery (within 2 hours of arrival). Of 21,166 patients initially managed nonoperatively, 18,506 were successful (79% of all-comers). Patients with isolated BSI are currently monitored approximately 5 days as inpatients. Of patients failing NOM, 95% failed during the first 72 hours, and monitoring 2 additional days saw only 1.5% more failures. Factors influencing success of NOM included computed tomographic injury grade, severity of patient injury, and American College of Surgeons designation of trauma center. Importantly, patients who failed NOM did not seem to have detrimental outcomes when compared with patients with successful NOM. No statistically significant predictive variables could be identified that would help predict patients who would go on to fail NOM.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that at least 80% of BSI can be managed successfully with NOM, and that patients should be monitored as inpatients for failure after BSI for 3 to 5 days.

Correlation of multidetector CT findings with splenic arteriography and surgery: prospective study in 392 patients

BACKGROUND

To determine the accuracy of contrast-enhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) in demonstrating splenic vascular injury based on results of splenic angiography and operation.

STUDY DESIGN

This institutional review board-approved study included 392 hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients whose admission MDCTs demonstrated splenic injury. Images were assessed for parenchymal injury grade, hemoperitoneum volume, and evidence of bleeding and nonbleeding splenic vascular injury. Splenic arteriography was performed for high splenic injury grade and splenic vascular injury. Medical records were reviewed to determine arteriographic interpretation, surgery indications and findings, outcomes, and demographics. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy of MDCT in detecting vascular injury were calculated based on results of arteriography and operation.

RESULTS

Splenic vascular injury was seen in 22% of patients (86 of 392) on MDCT. Presence of a vascular injury correlated with the CT-based parenchymal splenic injury grade (p < 0.0001). Active splenic bleeding was associated with subsequent clinical deterioration (p < 0.0001). Overall, MDCT had a sensitivity of 76% (76 of 100); specificity of 90% (95 of 106); negative and positive predictive values of 80% (95 of 119) and 87% (76 of 87), respectively; and accuracy of 83% (171 of 206) in detecting vascular injury compared with reference standards. The success rate of nonoperative management was 96%.

CONCLUSIONS

MDCT provides valuable information to direct initial clinical management of patients with blunt splenic trauma by demonstrating both active bleeding and nonbleeding vascular injuries. Not all vascular injuries are detected on MDCT, and splenic angiography is still indicated for high-grade parenchymal injury.

Experience with splenic main coil embolization and significance of new or persistent pseudoaneurym: reembolize, operate, or observe

BACKGROUND

To determine the need for further therapy in patients with persistent or new pseudoaneurysms (PSAs) after splenic main coil embolization.

METHODS

The institutional review board approved the study. The study group consisted of 400 hemodynamically stable patients (261 men, 139 women; mean age, 38.5 years) with blunt splenic injury. Abdominal computed tomography (ACT) images were assessed for grade of splenic injury, volume of hemoperitoneum, and evidence of splenic vascular injury including splenic vascular lesions and active bleeding. Splenic arteriography was performed for high-grade splenic injury and for ACT evidence of vascular injury. Follow-up ACT was reviewed for evidence of new or persistent PSAs after main coil embolization of the splenic artery. Medical records were reviewed to determine final outcome and any additional therapies used.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients had persistent (27) or new PSAs (5) after main coil embolization. Of these patients, two required splenectomy and one splenorrhaphy. The nonoperative salvage rate was 91% and the splenic salvage rate was 94%; this was comparable to the overall salvage rate of 95%.

CONCLUSION

Splenic embolization remains a valuable adjunct in splenic salvage. Patients with persistent or new splenic PSAs after main coil embolization have similar splenic salvage rates to the overall cohort without additional therapies.

Angiography and embolisation in blunt splenic injury: a review

The surgical care of patients has evolved over the last 50 years. Operative intervention in the face of blunt spleen injury has been supplanted by non-operative techniques. Two of the newest techniques, angiography and embolisation, are reviewed in this article with references to patient selection, technique used and outcomes. Furthermore, current weaknesses in the data available are discussed in order to provide surgeons with a complete overview of the techniques.

Optimization of selection for nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: comparison of MDCT grading systems

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the usefulness of two CT grading systems of blunt splenic trauma in predicting which patients need surgery or angioembolization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four hundred patients in hemodynamically stable condition admitted with blunt splenic injury were included in the study. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced MDCT. Grade of splenic injury was prospectively assigned according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) splenic injury scale. Patients were treated with surgical intervention, splenic arteriography with or without embolization, or observation alone. All MDCT images were retrospectively reviewed and regraded according to a novel grading system that specifically incorporates the findings of active bleeding or splenic vascular injury, including pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula. Receiver operating characteristics curves were generated with both grading systems for all splenic interventions, and statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curves for the new splenic grading system for splenic arteriography, surgery, and both interventions exceeded 80%. The area under the curve for the new splenic grading system was greater than that for the AAST injury scale for all interventions. Differences were found to be statistically significant for splenic arteriography (p = 0.0036) and the combination of arteriography and surgery (p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSION

The proposed CT grading system is better than the AAST system for predicting which patients with blunt splenic trauma need arteriography or splenic intervention.

Blunt splenic trauma: delayed-phase CT for differentiation of active hemorrhage from contained vascular injury in patients

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate delayed-phase computed tomography (CT) in the differentiation of active splenic hemorrhage requiring emergent treatment from contained vascular injuries (pseudoaneurysms or arteriovenous fistulas) that can be treated electively or managed conservatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study; the informed consent requirement was waived. Forty-seven patients with blunt splenic injury diagnosed at CT after blunt abdominal trauma were evaluated. Abdominal and pelvic dual-phase CT was performed; images were obtained 60-70 seconds and 5 minutes after contrast material injection. Scans were reviewed in consensus by two radiologists. Splenic injuries were graded with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Splenic Injury Scale. Patients with intrasplenic hyperattenuating foci on portal venous phase images were classified as having active splenic hemorrhage (group 1) or a contained vascular injury (group 2) on the basis of delayed-phase imaging findings. Findings suggestive of active hemorrhage included areas that remained hyperattenuating or increased in size on delayed-phase images. The clinical outcome of these patients was determined by reviewing their medical records. Relationships between several factors were tested with the Fisher exact test, including (a) the presence or absence of hyperattenuating foci and management and (b) the presence of contained vascular injury or active extravasation and management.

RESULTS

Portal venous phase CT revealed a focal high-attenuation parenchymal contrast material collection in 19 patients: nine patients were classified as group 1 and 10 were classified as group 2. All patients in group 1 underwent emergent splenectomy, and all patients in group 2 were initially treated without surgery. Significant differences in management were noted on the basis of whether hyperattenuating foci were seen on portal venous phase images (P < .001) and whether hyperattenuating foci seen at portal venous phase imaging were further characterized as active splenic hemorrhage or a contained vascular injury at delayed-phase CT (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In blunt splenic injury, delayed-phase CT helps differentiate patients with active splenic hemorrhage from those with contained vascular injuries.

Nonoperative management of severe blunt splenic injury: are we getting better?

BACKGROUND

Most minor splenic injuries are readily treated nonoperatively but controversy exists regarding the role of nonoperative management for higher-grade injuries. The infrequency of these injuries has made evaluation of factors critical to their management difficult.

METHODS

Through the National Trauma Data Bank, 3,085 adults sustaining severe (Abbreviated Injury Scale score > or = 4) blunt splenic injury from 1997 to 2003 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient management, demographic information, physiologic data, procedures performed, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Nonoperative management was attempted in 40.5% of patients but ultimately failed in 54.6% of those. Failure of nonoperative management was associated with increased age, low admission systolic blood pressure, higher injury severity score, and increased hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. Mortality associated with failure of nonoperative management (12.3%) and successful observation (13.8%) was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative management of higher-grade splenic injuries is associated with a high rate of failure and prolonged hospital stay. Careful judgment must be exercised in applying nonoperative management to patients with severe splenic injuries.

Evaluation of a 15-year experience with splenic injuries in a state trauma system

BACKGROUND

The management of splenic injuries has evolved with a greater emphasis on nonoperative management. Although several institutions have demonstrated that nonoperative management of splenic injuries can be performed with an increasing degree of success, the impact of this treatment shift on outcome for all patients with splenic injuries remains unknown. We hypothesized that outcomes for patients with splenic injuries have improved as the paradigm for splenic injury treatment has shifted.

METHODS

Consecutive patients from 1987 to 2001 with splenic injuries who were entered into a state trauma registry were reviewed. Demographic variables, injury characteristics, and outcome data were collected.

RESULTS

The number of patients who were diagnosed with splenic injuries increased from 1987 through 2001, despite a stable number of institutions submitting data to the registry. The number of minor injuries and severe splenic injuries remained stable, and the number of moderately severe injuries significantly increased over time. Overall mortality rate improved but primarily reflected the decreased mortality rates of moderately severe injuries; the mortality rate for severe splenic injuries was unchanged.

CONCLUSION

Trauma centers are seeing increasing numbers of splenic injuries that are less severe in magnitude, although the number of the most severe splenic injuries is stable. The increased proportion of patients with less severe splenic injuries who are being admitted to trauma centers is a significant factor in the increased use and success rate of nonoperative management.

[Medical imaging in the management of abdominal trauma]

There is a marked trend toward nonoperative management of abdominal trauma. This has been possible thanks to the advances in imaging and interventional techniques. Computed tomography (CT), angiography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can guide the nonoperative management of abdominal trauma.

Nonoperative management of traumatic splenic injuries: is there a role for proximal splenic artery embolization?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to evaluate our experience with transcatheter proximal (i.e., main) splenic artery embolization (TPSAE) in the nonsurgical management of patients with grade III-V splenic injuries, according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) guidelines, and patients with splenic injuries associated with CT evidence of active contrast extravasation or blush (or cases meeting both criteria).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of patients with traumatic splenic injuries admitted during a 52-month period were retrospectively reviewed for patient age and sex, mechanism of injury, injury severity score (ISS), RBC transfusion requirements, AAST splenic injury CT grade, presence of active contrast extravasation or blush on CT examination, and amount of hemoperitoneum on CT examination. Demographics, CT findings, transfusion requirements, and outcome were compared using the Student's t test or chi-square test in patients undergoing standard nonoperative management and nonoperative management TPSAE-that is, TPSAE followed by nonoperative management.

RESULTS

Of the 79 identified patients with splenic trauma, 67 were managed nonoperatively. Thirty-seven patients (28 men, nine women; mean age, 40 years; mean ISS, 28.8) underwent nonoperative management TPSAE and 30 patients (27 men, three women; mean age, 37 years; mean ISS, 25.1) underwent nonoperative management. Age, sex, and ISS were not significantly different between the two groups. TPSAE was always technically feasible. Splenic injuries were significantly more severe in the nonoperative management TPSAE group than in the nonoperative management group with respect to the mean splenic injury AAST CT grade (3.7 vs 2, respectively; p < 0.0001), active contrast extravasation or blush (38% [14/37] vs 3% [1/30], respectively; p = 0.0005), and hemoperitoneum grade (1.6 vs 0.8, respectively; p = 0.0006). Secondary splenectomy rate was lower in the nonoperative management TPSAE group (2.7% [1/37] vs 10% [3/30]). No procedure-related complications were encountered during early and delayed clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSION

TPSAE is a feasible and safe adjunct to observation in the nonoperative management of severe traumatic splenic injuries. The secondary splenectomy rate using nonoperative management TPSAE (2.7%) is among the lowest reported despite a selection of severe injuries.

CURRENT MANAGEMENT OF BLUNT SPLENIC TRAUMA IN CHILDREN

BACKGROUND

Non-operative management of the great majority of blunt splenic injuries in children has become routine. Debate continues on the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, follow-up imaging and the duration of physical activity restrictions following injury. The purpose of this study was to review the recent experience of an Australian Paediatric Trauma Centre with splenic trauma to define current practice.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients with splenic trauma admitted to the Children's Hospital at Westmead between November 1995 and December 2003.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients with blunt splenic trauma were identified: 20 (51%) were multiply injured. Thirty-three (85%) children were managed non-operatively. The most common initial imaging method was computed tomography (n = 28, 72%). Fourteen patients (36%) were admitted to the ICU with a mean length of stay (LOS) of 4.1 days (range 1-13 days). The overall mean LOS was 10.8 days (range 1-43 days). Nineteen patients (50%) had imaging studies performed after diagnosis but before discharge. Further post-discharge imaging was carried out in 21 cases (54%). There were no deaths, but 10 patients developed complications. The mean documented activity restriction was 7.4 weeks (range 1-16 weeks).

CONCLUSION

The majority of children who had suffered blunt splenic trauma were safely managed non-operatively outside an ICU. In stable patients, there appeared to be no benefits associated with repeated imaging following the diagnosis of splenic trauma. Physical activity restriction in excess of 3-4 weeks did not appear to be warranted.

Is anything new in adult blunt splenic trauma?

Several decades ago, a shift occurred in the management of adult splenic injuries. Influenced by the experience in pediatric trauma patients, adult trauma surgeons began turning from mandatory operative treatment of all splenic injuries toward nonoperative management. Nonoperative treatment is now the most common method of management for patients with splenic injuries and is the most common method of splenic salvage. However, controversy exists about how to appropriately select patients for nonoperative treatment since bleeding from splenic injuries can incur significant morbidity and mortality. Recent refinements in the management of adult blunt splenic injuries will be reviewed.

Assessment of Nonoperative Management of Blunt Spleen and Liver Trauma

An 8-year analysis of nonoperative management (NOM) of spleen and liver trauma was done in a level 1 trauma center. Spleen and liver trauma was diagnosed in 279 patients: 93 children (<18), 137 younger adults (18–54), and 49 older adults (≥ 55). Nineteen patients who failed resuscitations died within 0–60 minutes of arrival and were excluded from treatment analysis. Operative management (OM) was done in 39 (15%) and NOM in 221 (85%) patients with failure (NOMF) in 11 (5%). NOM and NOMF was 82 per cent and 5.6 per cent in spleen, 74 per cent and 14.3 per cent in combined spleen/liver, and 96 per cent and 1.5 per cent in liver trauma ( P value <0.001). NOM was done in 99 per cent of children, 81 per cent of younger adults, and 68 per cent of older adults with 0 per cent, 8 per cent, and 10 per cent NOMF. Higher grades of splenic trauma and CT fluid had higher OM rate. NOM success rates were 93.8 per cent in grade 3 and 90.3 per cent in higher grades of spleen trauma. There was no NOMF in higher grades of liver trauma. CT fluid grade had no impact on NOMF. Female patients had higher mean injury severity score, age, and mortality compared to cohorts. NOM should be attempted in hemodynamically stable patients. Age over 55, higher grades of injury, and large hemoperitoneum were not predictors of failure of NOM.

Blunt Abdominal Trauma Patients: Can Organ Injury Be Excluded without Performing Computed Tomography?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether admission non-computed tomography (CT) criteria can exclude intra-abdominal injury in stable patients sustaining blunt abdominal trauma.

METHODS

Seven hundred fourteen hemodynamically stable patients with suspicion of blunt abdominal trauma were included in the study. Admission data for clinical examination, sonography, routine laboratory studies, chest/pelvic radiographic findings, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score were recorded. Each patient underwent helical abdominal CT. Injuries were considered major if they required surgery or angiographic intervention. At the authors' institution, angiography is routinely performed if there is a splenic injury of American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade II or higher or a liver injury of American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade III or higher. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the value of isolated and combined clinical, radiologic, and laboratory parameters in depicting an intra-abdominal injury with regard to CT results and clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

The best combination of criteria to identify a major abdominal injury was obtained when sonography, chest radiography, and three laboratory parameters (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, white blood cell count, and hematocrit) were normal: 22% (129 of 589) of patients without major injuries fulfilled these criteria. The only combination of criteria that completely excluded intra-abdominal injury was obtained when clinical criteria combined with a Glasgow Coma Scale score > 13, bedside radiologic studies, and laboratory data were all normal, but only 12% (68 of 578) of patients without abdominal injury fulfilled these criteria.

CONCLUSION

After blunt abdominal trauma, admission non-CT criteria can at best identify 12% of patients without intra-abdominal injuries and 22% of patients without major injuries.

Factors affecting clinical outcome of patients who undergo transcatheter arterial embolisation in splenic injury

Transcatheter arterial embolisation (TAE) offers a less invasive approach to traditional laparotomy for the management of bleeding in the context of blunt splenic injury. This is a retrospective review study to identify clinical factors associated with clinical outcome of the patients who underwent this procedure. Of 65 patients with splenic injuries at our institution, 26 patients underwent TAE for management of bleeding. The following factors were assessed to determine their relationship to procedure outcomes: American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade, complications, age, shock index, injury severity score (ISS), haemoglobin (Hb), haematocrit (Ht), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), systolic blood pressure (BP), BP changes during TAE, blood transfused before TAE and timing of TAE. The overall good clinical outcome rate was 73.1% (19/26). Of the factors we assessed, absence of concomitant pelvic injury, higher Hb, higher Ht, higher BP, greater increases in BP during TAE and a decreased requirement for blood transfusions before TAE were associated with good clinical outcome of the patients who underwent TAE in splenic injury.

Inter- and intrarater reliability in computed axial tomographic grading of splenic injury: why so many grading scales?

OBJECTIVE

After splenic trauma, critical decisions regarding operative intervention are often made with the aid of computed axial tomographic (CT) scan findings. No CT scan-based grading scale has been demonstrated to predict accurately which patients require operative or radiologic intervention for their splenic injuries. We hypothesized that use of the most common grading scale, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma scale, would be associated with low intra- and interreliability scores. We assessed the ability of experienced trauma radiologists to differentiate grade III from grade IV splenic injuries.

METHODS

The films of patients who had undergone abdominal CT scanning before splenectomy for grade III or IV injuries were serially evaluated by four trauma radiology faculty weekly for 3 weeks. We assessed intra- and interrater reliability for grading and for presence of contrast blush.

RESULTS

Intrarater reproducibility yielded a weighted kappa score of 0.15 to 0.77. Interrater reliability weighted kappa scores ranged from 0 to 0.84, with a mean value of 0.23.

CONCLUSION

CT imaging is not reliable for identifying grades III and IV splenic injury, as experienced radiologists often underestimate the magnitude of injury. Interrater reliability is poor. Factors other than the CT grade of splenic injury should determine whether patients require operative or angiographic therapy.

Intra-abdominal gastrointestinal tract injuries following blunt trauma: the experience of an Australian trauma centre

AIMS

The aim of the study was to use the extensive experience of an Australian Level I trauma centre to develop guidelines for diagnosis and management of significant gastrointestinal tract injuries (GITIs).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 74 patients admitted to Westmead Hospital between 1985 and 1996 who had sustained major gastrointestinal tract (GIT) injuries following blunt trauma. The patients were identified from the trauma unit database. Clinical information was retrieved from the database and augmented by a review of the medical records.

RESULTS

Motor vehicle accidents were responsible for 55 (92%) admissions. Laparotomy was performed as a result of a positive diagnostic peritoneal lavage in 26 (35.1%) patients, abdominal signs in 20 (27%), diagnostic findings on computed tomography in 19 (25.7%), haemodynamic instability in eight (10.8%) and a positive contrast study in one (1.4%) patient. There was a total of 95 injuries: one gastric (1.1%), eight duodenal (8.4%), 64 small bowel (67.3%), two appendiceal (2.1%), 19 colonic (20%) and one rectal (1.1%). Thirty day mortality was 23% (17 patients). Seven (9.5%) patients died within 24h of injury, three (4.1%) of which were directly related to the GIT. Ten (13.5%) patients died within 2 weeks of admission, three (4.1%) of which were attributable to the GIT. Thirty day GIT morbidity was 29.7% (22 patients). The development of GIT morbidity was significantly related to a delay to laparotomy of more than 24h (P=0.036) and tachycardia on presentation (P=0.023). Associated injuries, injury severity scores (ISS) and age did not significantly impact on GITI related morbidity and mortality.

DISCUSSION

Major GITIs are associated with a high mortality due to the severity and complexity of associated injuries. Morbidity from GITIs correlates to delays in diagnosis and management.

Using contrast-enhanced helical CT to visualize arterial extravasation after blunt abdominal trauma: incidence and organ distribution

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the incidence and organ distribution of arterial extravasation identified using contrast-enhanced helical CT in patients who had sustained abdominal visceral injuries and pelvic fractures after blunt trauma.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Five hundred sixty-five consecutive patients from four level I trauma centers who had CT scans showing abdominal visceral injuries or pelvic fractures were included in this series. The presence or absence of arterial extravasation, as well as the anatomic sites of arterial extravasation, was noted. We obtained clinical follow-up data, including surgical or angiographic findings.

RESULTS

In our series, 104 (18.4%) of 565 patients had arterial extravasation. Of the 104 patients, 81 (77.9%) underwent surgery, embolization, or both. The combined rate of surgery or embolization in patients with arterial extravasation was statistically higher than expected at all four institutions (p <0.001). The spleen was the most common organ injured, occurring in 277 (49.0%) of 565 patients, and arterial extravasation occurred in 49 (17.7%) of 277 patients with splenic injury. Several other visceral injuries were associated with arterial extravasation, including hepatic, renal, adrenal, and mesenteric injuries.

CONCLUSION

Based on the limited reports of arterial extravasation in the nonhelical CT literature, the percentage (18%) of clinically stable patients in our study with CT scans showing arterial extravasation was higher than anticipated. This finding likely reflects the improved diagnostic capability of helical CT. Although the spleen and liver were the organs most commonly associated with arterial extravasation, radiologists should be aware that arterial extravasation may be associated with several other visceral injuries.

Implications of the "contrast blush" finding on computed tomographic scan of the spleen in trauma

BACKGROUND

The "contrast blush" (CB) computed tomographic (CT) scan finding has often been used clinically as an indicator for therapeutic splenic intervention (SI) (splenectomy, splenorrhaphy, or angiographic embolization). We sought to examine the prognostic significance of this finding.

METHODS

The records and CT scans of 324 trauma patients from two Level I trauma centers who had blunt splenic injury and a CT scan of the abdomen within 24 hours of admission were reviewed and screened for CB.

RESULTS

CB was identified in 11% of patients, and its incidence was significantly related to the grade of injury: grade I/II, 3.2%; grade III, 11.8%; and grade IV/V, 26.3% (p < 0.001). SI was also related to the grade: grade I/II, 7.7%; grade III, 37.6%; and grade IV/V, 69.7% (p < 0.001). The chance of having SI was greater in those with CB (75.0%) when compared with those without CB (25.0%) (p < 0.001; odds ratio, 9.2). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that SI correlated independently with splenic grade, emergency department hypotension, and age, but did not demonstrate a correlation with CB.

CONCLUSION

CB is not an absolute indication for an operative or angiographic intervention. Factors such as patient age, grade of injury, and presence of hypotension need to be considered in the clinical management of these patients.

Recent advances in trauma management

Twenty-three thousand doctors in the UK have undertaken The Advanced Trauma Life Support Course for doctors over the past 12 years. The course was never designed to provide anything more than a framework within which inexperienced doctors could safely manage multiple injured patients until expert help arrived. Its critics will say that the course is didactic and its treatment protocols are not always up to date. Since its inception in 1976 in Nebraska it has undergone constant revision and the seventh edition of the course will appear in 2002. With each revision, evidence for new methods of management for the trauma victims are reviewed; some of these are discussed in this paper.

Outcome of the current management of splenic injuries

BACKGROUND

For patients > 55 years, nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury remains controversial. Conflicting reports of excessively high or acceptably low failure rates have discouraged widespread application of NOM in these older patients. However, the small number of patients in these studies limits the impact of their conclusions.

METHODS

We manage splenic injury nonoperatively in all appropriate patients without regard to age. We present the largest series of patients > 55 years who have been managed nonsurgically, in a retrospective review of all patients with blunt splenic injury admitted to our trauma center between 1996 and 1999.

RESULTS

In 4 years, 542 patients were admitted with blunt splenic injury. Eighty-three patients were > 55 years, and 61 of these patients underwent NOM. Seven older patients failed NOM and required delayed splenectomy, yielding a failure rate of 11.4%. This failure rate was statistically equivalent to the 7% failure rate of patients < 55 years. This study has a power of 80% to detect a failure rate change from 7% to 20%. By multivariate analysis, the only factor that significantly increased the risk of NOM failure was splenic injury grade. Patients > 55 years had a higher mortality than younger patients regardless of NOM/operative treatment. Splenic injury did not directly cause any of the deaths in patients > 55 years who had NOM or failure of NOM. High-grade splenic injuries fail NOM in those > 55 years.

CONCLUSION

Nonoperative management of lower grade splenic injuries in patients > 55 years can be accomplished with an acceptably low failure rate. Only grade of splenic injury, not patient age, increases the risk of NOM failure.

Invasive radiology for pediatric trauma

Interventional radiology has assumed an expanded role in the management of the pediatric trauma patient. Transcatheter endovascular embolization for the polytraumatized and bleeding patient has proven to be effective and potentially life saving. Nonvascular interventional techniques can be applied to the pediatric trauma patient with curative or temporizing effects. The minimally invasive nature and rapidity of these procedures allows their emergent use in both the unstable and stable pediatric trauma patient.

Failures of splenic nonoperative management: is the glass half empty or half full?

BACKGROUND

Published contraindications to nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI) include age > or = 55, Glasgow Coma Scale score < or = 13, admission blood pressure < 100 mm Hg, major (grades 3-5) injuries, and large amounts of hemoperitoneum. Recently reported NOM rates approximate 60%, with failure rates of 10% to 15%. This study evaluated our failures of NOM for BSI relative to these clinical factors.

METHODS

All patients with BSI at a Level I trauma center over a 46-month period ending September 1999 were reviewed. Failures of NOM included patients initially selected for NOM who subsequently required splenectomy/splenorrhaphy.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-eight had BSI. Twenty-three percent (128) underwent emergent laparotomy for hemodynamic instability and 77% (430) were observed. The NOM failure rate was only 8%. Univariate analysis identified moderate to large hemoperitoneum (p < 0.03), grades 3 to 5 (p < 0.004), and age > or = 55 (p < 0.0006) as being significantly associated with failure. Multivariate analysis identified age > or = 55 and grades 3 to 5 injuries as independent predictors of failure. The highest failure rates (30-40%) occurred in patients age > or = 55 with major injury for moderate to large hemoperitoneum. Mortality rates for successful NOM were 12%, and 9% for failed NOM.

CONCLUSION

Inclusion of all high-risk patients increased the NOM rate while maintaining a low failure rate. Although age > or = 55 and major BSI were independently associated with failure of NOM, approximately 80% of these high-risk patients were successfully managed nonoperatively. There was no increased mortality associated with failure. Although these factors may indeed predict failure, they do not necessarily contraindicate NOM.

Nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury: use of CT criteria to select patients for splenic arteriography and potential endovascular therapy

PURPOSE

To determine if contrast material-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) can be used to select patients with blunt splenic injuries to undergo arteriographic embolization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During a 15-month period, 78 patients who were hemodynamically stable and required no immediate surgery underwent contrast-enhanced spiral CT followed by splenic arteriography. CT scans were assessed for splenic vascular contrast material extravasation or posttraumatic splenic vascular lesions. Medical records were reviewed for splenic arteriographic results and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

There were 25 grade I, 12 grade II, 27 grade III, 12 grade IV, and two grade V splenic injuries. CT showed active contrast material extravasation in seven patients and splenic vascular lesions in 19 patients. At CT, splenic vascular contrast material extravasation was 100% (seven of seven patients) and a posttraumatic splenic vascular lesion was 83% (10 of 12 patients) sensitive on the basis of arteriographic or surgical outcome in predicting the need for transcatheter embolization or splenic surgery. Overall, CT had a sensitivity of 81% (17 of 21 patients), a specificity of 84% (48 of 57 patients), negative and positive predictive values of 92% (48 of 52 patients) and 65% (17 of 26 patients), respectively, and an accuracy of 83% (65 of 78 patients) in predicting the need for splenic injury treatment.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced spiral CT plays a valuable role in selecting hemodynamically stable patients with splenic vascular injury who may be treated with transcatheter therapy and potentially improves the success rate of nonsurgical management.