Functional outcome of high-pressure injection injuries of the hand

High risk and low incidence diseases: High-pressure injection injury

INTRODUCTION

High-pressure injection injury is a serious condition that carries with it a high rate of morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

This review highlights the pearls and pitfalls of high-pressure injection injury, including presentation, diagnosis, and management in the emergency department (ED) based on current evidence.

DISCUSSION

High-pressure injection injuries are uncommon entities caused by powerful jet streams, typically from high-pressure liquid spraying machines capable of generating forces exceeding thousands of pounds per square inch (psi). These injuries usually result from accidents or equipment malfunctions and most often involve the nondominant hand. The severity of these injuries can be easily overlooked due to the initially innocuous appearance of the small entry wound. Commonly injected substances in high-pressure injuries include paint, paint thinner, automotive grease, and diesel oil. Among these, diesel oil, paint, and paint thinner are associated with higher rates of morbidity and complications. Imaging is recommended to assess the affected area, which can reveal subcutaneous emphysema with the extent observed indicating the spread of the substance. Treatment of high-pressure injection injuries requires consideration of the injury to avoid treatment delays, emergent surgical consultation, analgesic and antibiotic administration, tetanus prophylaxis if necessary, irrigation to remove any large debris, and elevation of the affected extremity. Operative intervention typically includes decompression and debridement, and early intervention is associated with improved outcomes. The use of steroids is controversial. Patients should be admitted to optimize management and for further monitoring.

CONCLUSION

An understanding of high-pressure injection injury can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this potentially devastating injury.

High-Pressure Injection Injury of the Hand-A Rare but True Surgical Emergency

Background/Objectives: The aim is to bring attention to the existence of a rare type of trauma of the hand, high-pressure injection injury, that appears to be minor with negligible signs and symptoms within the first hours after the accident, but in reality, produces significant tissue destruction with severe consequences. Recognizing this type of trauma by medical personnel, understanding the mechanisms involved, and knowing the etiological and prognostic factors can lead to early treatment initiation and avoid severe mutilating sequelae. Methods: A retrospective study on 16 patients diagnosed with high-pressure injection injuries, including water, air, paint, paint mixed paint with thinner, petroleum jelly, and lime (washable paint containing calcium oxide). The patients' epidemiological data, the time from accident to diagnosis, reasons for delayed diagnosis, treatments applied, and outcomes were recorded and evaluated. Results: All injuries occurred at the workplace due to negligence. Oil-based paint was implicated in 31.25% of cases. The most frequently affected anatomical region was the volar surface of the distal phalanx of the nondominant hand index finger. In one case, delayed presentation to medical care and diagnosis resulted in a compartment syndrome, requiring amputation. Conclusions: It is crucial to recognize and understand this type of trauma, as it constitutes an emergency due to its rapid progression. Delayed diagnosis can result in massive tissue destruction, potentially leading to the loss of limb segments and debilitating functional sequelae, which may severely impact a patient's socio-professional life.

Injection Injury Caused by Disinfectant During COVID-19: A Case Report

High-pressure injection injury of the hand is a rare but severe emergency, which requires full attention and timely treatment. However, the early symptoms may not be obvious. As the swelling and necrosis progress, the condition gradually worsens, and in severe cases, it may end with amputation. We report a particular case of a hand injection injury, which occurred to a worker who worked overtime to produce disinfectant during the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic. Because of the chemical toxicity of the disinfectant and pressure's damage, although the emergency debridement was promptly performed, we still lost some fingers in the end. In the existing disinfection product manuals, we have not seen any tips on dealing with tissue injection injury. It may reduce workers' attention to injuries, leading to delays in emergency operations.

High-Pressure Injection Injuries to the Foot: A Case Report of 2 Patients

Background:

High-pressure injections injuries to the extremities can result in significant disability, including amputation of the affected limb. Proprietary mixtures associated with drill mud and hydraulic fracking leads to frequent encounters with varied materials. The physician needs to be aware of the effect of these materials when inadvertent exposure occurs. Injected toxic materials cause extensive soft tissue inflammation and destruction. This puts the foot at risk not only to the cleaning fluid used, generally water, but any contaminant on the boot at the time of injury. This case report is the first known case report involving injection with drill mud contaminant and describes 2 oil field injuries resulting in the gross deep contamination of the foot from a high-pressure washer injury.

Case Report:

Two patients, a 46-year-old man (patient 1) and a 29-year-old man (patient 2) sustained high-pressure injection injuries to the foot. These patients underwent treatment with immediate broad-spectrum antibiotics and emergent irrigation and debridement on arrival to the treating facility. Neither patient underwent amputation of the affected extremity as a result of their injuries and achieved a full recovery and return to work.

Conclusion:

High-pressure injection injuries are operative emergencies. Treatment should include tetanus prophylaxis, neurovascular monitoring, broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage, emergent operative debridement for toxic materials. Despite the toxic nature of the injection injuries, aggressive treatment can improve the chance of salvage in these industrial injuries.

High-pressure injection injuries to the hand: A 14-year descriptive study

Background:

High-pressure injection (HPI) injury is an unusual type of injury in hand trauma, which could lead to a serious morbidity. We aimed to assess the clinical presentation, management, and outcome with HPI injury of the hand.

Methods:

A retrospective study was conducted between 2001 and 2015 for patients with HPI injuries who were admitted to a Level 1 trauma center. We reviewed the medical records, imaging files, and demographic data including gender, age, mechanism of injury, and site of hand injury. The kind of injected materials, time to first treatment procedure, clinical management, and complications were also described.

Results:

A total of 32 cases of HPI injuries were included in the study. The average age of the patients was 32.7 ± standard deviation 8.3 years, and all the patients were right handed. The most common material involved was grease (53%), followed by paints (25.0%), chemicals (9.4%), and air (6.3%). The most commonly affected part of the hand was the palm (31.3%), followed by index finger (25.0%). The average delay in the presentation was 12 h (range 3–96 h), and the mean hospital stay was 5.8 days. Management included debridement (90.6%) or conservative treatment (9.4%). Complications included chronic pain (9.4%), followed by amputation (3.1%).

Conclusions:

HPI injury is not uncommon, usually underestimated, and needs more community awareness, particularly laborers. Delay of treatment could increase the risk of amputation. Therefore, it is important to inform the risk groups about the seriousness of such injuries and to take preventive measures.

High-Pressure Injection Injury Caused by Electronic Cigarette Explosion: A Case Report

CASE

Electronic cigarettes are an increasingly popular and poorly regulated alternative to traditional cigarettes that deliver nicotine and other aerosolized substances to the user via a battery-powered atomizer. We report a case in which an electronic cigarette explosion resulted in a high-pressure injection injury of the finger.

CONCLUSION

Explosions involving electronic cigarettes and similar handheld products should be treated as high-pressure injection injuries until proven otherwise. Radiographs are indispensable in the workup of these injuries. Because the true content of injected material cannot be determined with certainty, we recommend immediate surgical debridement, intravenous antibiotics, and close follow-up to observe the evolution of the injury.

High-Pressure Water Injection Injuries of the Hand May Not Be Trivial

High-pressure water injection injuries of the hand are uncommon, and there is limited literature to guide their treatment. The ideal management of these injuries, whether nonoperative with close observation or early surgical debridement, remains unknown. The authors retrospectively identified a cohort of patients with high-pressure water injection injuries to the hand during a 16-year period. Data collected included demographics, location of injection, hand dominance, type of treatment, need for additional surgery, and complications. The authors attempted to reach all patients by phone and email to assess long-term motion loss, sensation loss, and chronic pain. Nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria. The nondominant hand was involved in 84% and the index finger in nearly half. Two of 10 patients in the early surgery group required additional procedures, including a trigger finger release and serial debridements for Pseudomonas infection. Three of 9 patients without early debridement eventually required surgery, including debridement of a septic flexor tenosynovitis, fingertip amputation, and metacarpophalangeal disarticulation. Sixteen percent of patients developed infection, and 1 patient developed compartment syndrome. This is the largest reported cohort of both operatively and nonoperatively treated high-pressure water injection injuries to the hand. This is the first report of amputation as a complication. Infection and delayed presentation portend a poor outcome. Complications may arise even after early surgical debridement, and long-term sequelae are common. These injuries are not inherently benign and warrant immediate medical attention, early antibiotics, and a low threshold for close observation or surgical debridement. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(2):e245-e251.].

High-pressure injection injury: Role of early detection and aggressive intervention

Emergency department physicians can easily underestimate the severity of damage underlying the innocuous looking high-pressure injection injuries. These work-related injuries lead to significant lifelong morbidity as functionality is compromised in most cases, even after recovery due to high rates of amputation. Hence it is important to consider all high-pressure injection injuries as surgical emergencies. A detailed case history including pressure of the instrument, nature of the material, volume injected, angle of injection and time since injury should guide the treatment. Immediate debridement, antibiotic therapy and postoperative care are essential in all cases. Success of the treatment largely depends on early initiation of the therapy. Relying exclusively on non-surgical interventions may not be favorable in most cases as the injected material will continue damaging the internal tissues. Patients have to undergo a long recovery period with physiotherapy to regain the functionality of the affected region. However, the sensory and motor functions will never be returned to normal levels in these injuries.

High pressure injection injuries

High pressure injection injuries are infrequent occurrences but their innocuous appearance leads to underestimation of their severity and results in significant morbidity. A good history and early referral of these injuries to a hand surgeon may help in reducing this morbidity. The nature of the substance injected (its volume, viscosity and toxicity), its site of injection and distribution of spread, the pressure of injection and delay to surgical debridement are all believed to be factors that contribute to the outcome of these injuries. Early surgical debridement should be the mainstay of treatment of these injuries. Any decision to treat these injuries nonoperatively should be made by an experienced hand surgeon and is only appropriate in selected cases. Most patients will require postoperative hand therapy, will experience a prolonged time to healing and will be left with long term motor and sensory deficits.

High-Pressure Water Swelling Sealant Injection Injury to the Hand: a Case Report and Review of the Literature

High-pressure injection injuries (HPII) caused by water swelling sealant are rare at present. The patient generally has small-sized skin lesions, and the misleadingly benign presentation may cause delayed treatment at the early stage of management. In addition, radiographic examination may be underestimated. Subsequently, the inadequate surgical intervention may cause tissue necrosis and poor prognosis. Furthermore, the early recognition of water swelling sealant injected into tissue and emergent surgical intervention are the key to successful management for the patient with HPII caused by injecting water swelling sealant to tissue.

Digital high-pressure injection injury: the importance of early recognition and treatment

High-pressure injection (HPI) injuries are an uncommon mechanism of trauma. The clinical effects of the HPI injury depend upon a number of variables including the pressures involved, chemical toxicity, quantity of material injected and its temperature. Evidence within the literature has shown that delay in identifying and treating such injuries can lead to devastating consequences. We describe one such case of a HPI injury involving engine oil to a digit. In addition, we review the clinical course, pathophysiology and management of such injuries.

High-pressure injection injuries to the hand

The severity of high-pressure injection injuries to the hand is often underappreciated on initial presentation. These injuries require urgent and thorough surgical débridement. Despite the advances in our understanding of this injury type and the decline in amputation rates, the risk of long-term morbidity with diminished function and chronic symptoms remains high, and the role of systemic steroids in treatment is uncertain. Functional outcome of the hand and upper extremity following high-pressure injection injuries depends on a number of factors, including the magnitude of the initial wounding force, the chemical properties and volume of the substance injected, the presence of secondary infection, and the timing and thoroughness of débridement. Further investigation is required to determine the relative significance of these factors and the effectiveness of steroids in treatment.

High-pressure injection injuries in the hand: current treatment concepts

BACKGROUND

High-pressure injection injury to the hand and upper extremity is a rare but very serious clinical entity. The objective of this article was to review the current available literature and highlight important topics.

METHODS

A PubMed literature search was undertaken with the terms "high pressure injection injuries," "injection injuries," "finger injection injuries," and other related terms. Articles were reviewed with specific attention to clinical presentation, treatment, outcome, and prognostic variables.

RESULTS

Most of the available literature included case studies, case series, retrospective cohorts, and literature reviews. The most common presentation of a high-pressure injection injury is a puncture wound on the nondominant index finger of a working class man in his mid thirties. Important factors at presentation include the time of injury and type and pressure of material injected. Initial treatment should include tetanus prophylaxis, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and urgent consultation with a hand surgeon. Injections with air, gas, or small amounts of veterinary vaccines can usually be managed with observation and serial examinations if there is not concern for compartment syndrome. Injections with other liquid materials typically require emergent surgical débridement, with the best outcomes occurring when treated within 6 hours. A wide surgical irrigation and débridement of necrotic tissues should be performed under general or regional anesthesia. Organic and caustic materials are associated with a higher amputation rate, and decreasing the time from injury to surgery improves the prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

High-pressure injection injuries to the hand can result in permanent impairment. Proper diagnosis and urgent treatment are essential for a good outcome.

Late presentation of a case of high pressure cement injection injury to the hand

High-pressure injection injuries to the upper extremity cause potentially severe complications that result in multiple operations, amputations, and permanent functional deficits. Early exploration and debridement are the mainstays of treatment for optimal functional recovery. We describe the late presentation of a high-pressure cement injection injury to the hand, its management, and long term course.

[The role of a systematic second look at 48-72 hours in high-pressure injection injuries to the hand: a retrospective study]

OBJECTIVES

Poorly standardized, the management of high pressure injections (HPI) is frequently too late and inadequate, some teams reporting up to 50% of amputations. HPI causes inoculation of toxic particles in depth, particularly difficult to remove surgically. The persistence of this foreign material maintains local inflammation and increases the risk of infection. The objective of this article is to validate the benefit of a systematic "second look" at 48-72 hours in HPI.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study from 2006 to 2010, of patients who had a HPI into the hand. All patients had initial debridement surgery and a "second look" was systematically performed at 48-72 hours.

RESULTS

During this period, six patients were treated for a HPI of paint (n=4) or oil (n=2). The time between the accident and surgery was 12.4 hours (2-24). Four patients had good functional outcome with no disabling sequelae. We performed two amputations. At six months, five patients returned to work.

CONCLUSIONS

Early management determines the prognosis of the HPI. Extended debridement within six hours showed a better functional outcome than later treatment. Performing a systematic "second look" allows further washing/debridement and gives the possibility to be more conservative during the initial procedure. This second debridement allows excision of the newly formed necrosis and to evacuate the remaining toxic residues. Finally, patients reported good functional outcome.

[Interest of a systematic second-look at 48-72 hours in high-pressure injections of paint: an animal study]

STUDY PURPOSE

High-pressure injections (HPI) in the hand are rare and their prognosis is often tragic, some authors report up to 48% of amputations. Poorly standardized, their management is often too late and inadequate. The HPI of paint results in inoculation of toxic particles in depth that are particularly difficult to remove surgically. The persistence of this foreign material maintains local inflammation and increases the risk of infection. We wanted to simulate in rats, the physiopathology of HPI with paint. The aim of this study is to authenticate an advantage to achieve consistently a second surgical debridement at 48-72 hours in HPI with paint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six rats were injected with 200 bars of white glycerophtalic paint in the leg. At six hours and then every 24 hours for four days, we did a debridement and a surgical washing, then at the end of intervention a tissue sample was analyzed by histology.

RESULTS

Despite surgical debridement and thorough washing, at each step we found the persistence of painting in the intermuscular septa by light microscopy. From 24 hours, a necroinflammatory process is set up with an influx of neutrophils, organizing themselves into micro-abscesses. It will be very deleterious, initially by encouraging risk of sepsis, and then facilitating the formation of extensive fibrosis, which is the cause of functional impairment.

CONCLUSION

We established the kinetics of tissue under HPI with paint using an animal model. It appears that single emergency surgery is insufficient to manage this "septic compartment syndrome". Therefore, we recommend a systematic surgical "second look" at 48-72 hours to complete the debridement of residual inoculum and necrotic tissue without wound closure.

Joint arthritis and soft-tissue problems of the hand

The hand, by virtue of its position in space, complex anatomical composition, and characteristic biomechanical properties, is subject to a host of disease processes and traumatic injuries. This article reviews the presentation, evaluation, treatment, and outcomes of treatment in hand infections, high-pressure injection injuries, Dupuytren disease, and arthritis.

[High pressure injection injuries to the hand]

The severity of high pressure injection injuries to the hand is often underestimated in the initial clinical examination. Therefore, it is critical to obtain information about the course of the accident, the pressure involved and the injected substance. X-ray examination can reveal the injected substance or accompanying air in the tissues and therapy is usually surgical. All compartments should be released and all foreign material should be thoroughly removed. There is often a need for second look surgery. Wound closure should be achieved within 1 week and the decision about amputation should fall within 2 weeks. Hand therapy is essential beginning from the day after trauma and it may be continued for weeks or even months.From 1998 to 2008, 36 patients were treated after high pressure injection injury to the hand, 19 patients were transferred to the replantation centre immediately and 17 secondarily. These 19 injuries resulted in finger amputations and/or pain syndromes in 12 patients (33%) including 2 out of the primary group (10%) and 10 out of the secondary group (59%). It can be concluded that high pressure injuries to the hand should be treated in replantation centres.

The 'Butter Test' to guide effective tissue cleansing after high-pressure injection injury

A case of high-pressure fingertip injury with an unknown paint primer injectate, and the use of a simple test to determine whether it is water- or solvent-based in order to guide subsequent optimal debridement, is presented. The favourable outcome achieved was felt to have resulted, in part, from the effective single debridement thus achieved.

Humane killers, human injury: functional outcome of vole captive bolt injuries

BACKGROUND

High-pressure blast injuries to the hand due to vole captive bolt devices are serious injuries that are to a great extent unknown to emergency care operators and trauma surgeons. There is no study on the functional outcome of these patients.

METHODS

We assessed the functional outcome of patients with injuries inflicted by vole captive bolt devices. Therefore, a protocol consisting of a physical examination and an assessment of static muscle power (grip and pinch strength) was performed. To capture the subjective experience of patients regarding their injury related disability and impairment, the DASH follow-up questionnaire was used. Based on clinical/radiologic findings and outcome, a classification of this unique subgroup of blast injuries was developed.

RESULTS

The functional outcome of 34 patients suffering hand injuries due to captive bolt devices between 2004 and 2007 was assessed. A significant reduction of static muscle testing parameters compared with the uninjured hand was revealed. Fourteen patients lost a digit. Average time lost from work was 5.4 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Vole captive bolt device-related hand injuries are followed by deterioration of hand function. The present observations alarmed national authorities. The manufacturers were required to take engineering and teaching measures to rule out handling errors that were identified as leading cause of injury.

High-pressure injection injury of the hand: an often underestimated trauma: case report with study of the literature

The real extent of damage in high-pressure injection injuries (grease gun injuries, paint gun injuries, pressure gun in juries) is hidden behind a small and frequently painless punctiform skin lesion on the finger or the hand. These kinds of injuries require prompt surgical intervention with surgical debridement of all ischemic tissue. Possibility of a general intoxication by the fluid must always be ruled out. Postoperative intensive physiotherapy is essential for the final hand function. The initial benign aspect is frequently causing a delay for an adequate treatment while in the mean time the possibility for subcutaneous damage continuously increases. Because of this delay the chance of permanent reduced functionality in the hand or finger amputation raises. Not only the latency time to adequate treatment but also the injected fluid's nature, the pressure, the volume and the location of injection, has influence on the seriousness and extensiveness of subcutaneous damage. All these factors influence the functional outcome of the patient.

Non-operative management of a high-pressure water injection injury to the hand

High-pressure injection injuries to the hand are work-related injuries that can take a devastating toll on the functionality of the affected extremity. Chemical injections are a surgical emergency. Injuries involving only water injection are rarer and have variable management strategies. We report a case of high-pressure injection hand injury due to water only. The patient was managed non-operatively with parenteral antibiotics, narcotics and elevation, with good outcome. We present a review of the literature on high-pressure injection injury.

High-pressure injection injuries to the upper extremity: a review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this review was to identify the relative impact of injected material, location of injury, time to debridement, injection pressure, infection, and the use of adjuvant steroid medication upon the need for amputation after high-pressure injection injuries to the upper extremity.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

A Medline literature search extending from 1966 to December 2003 was performed, referencing the key words "high-pressure injection injury," "grease gun injury," "paint gun injury," "pressure gun injury," and "high-pressure injection." The results were limited to the English language and to reports involving human subjects. Each abstract was reviewed to confirm that the described injury had occurred in the upper extremity and that it had truly been a high-pressure injection. The reference pages from each of the papers were reviewed to identify additional reports of high-pressure injection injury. Manuscripts describing injuries resulting from hand held syringes or other low-pressure mechanisms were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

All of the manuscripts were analyzed to identify the clinical outcome, age, hand dominance, site of injection, substance injected, injection pressure, elapsed time to wide debridement, use of steroids, and incidence of infection. These variables were subjected to a Pearson chi test to determine their impact upon the need for amputation.

RESULTS

Four hundred thirty-five cases of high-pressure injection injury to the upper extremity were identified. The amputation rate after these injuries was 30%. The location of the injury and the material injected contributed significantly to the need for amputation. For injections of paint, paint thinner, gasoline, oil, or jet fuel (organic solvents), the amputation risk was lower if wide surgical debridement occurred within 6 hours of injury. Steroids did not impact the amputation rate or incidence of infection. The presence of infection did not affect the incidence of amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of amputation after high-pressure injection injury to the upper extremity is highest with organic solvent injection into the fingers. Injections into the thumb or palm result in a much lower frequency of tissue loss. Emergent surgical debridement reduces the amputation risk after injections of organic solvents. From the available data, no conclusions could be reached regarding functional outcomes, other than amputation, after high-pressure injection injury.

Long-term follow-up of high-pressure injection injuries to the hand

BACKGROUND

High-pressure injection injury is an injury caused by accidental injection of substances by industrial equipment. This injury may have devastating sequelae. The goal of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of high-pressure injection injury to the hand.

METHODS

In this historical prospective study, patients who had previously sustained high-pressure injection injury were examined. Assessment included measurement of grip and pinch strength, range of motion, two-point discrimination, and use of a questionnaire regarding present complaints and return to the work force.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were examined. Follow-up length was on average 8.5 years. The injured hand was most often (43 percent) the right dominant hand, the index in 65 percent, the thumb in 25 percent, and other locations in 10 percent. Only 43 percent of patients returned to their previous employment. Patient complaints were, in descending frequency, cold intolerance, hypersensitivity, paresthesias, constant pain, and impairment of activities of daily living. Metacarpophalangeal range of motion was decreased on average by 8.1 percent (p = 0.019), proximal interphalangeal joint range of motion was decreased by 23.9 percent (p = 0.001), and distal interphalangeal range of motion was decreased by 29.7 percent (p= 0.018). Maximum grip was decreased compared with the expected grip by 12 percent (p = 0.023). Pinch was decreased by 35 percent (p < 0.001). Two-point discrimination was increased by 49 percent (p < 0.007).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the fact that high-pressure injection injury to the hand is a significant problem. Virtually all patients suffer sequelae of this injury. The injury has significant repercussions for future function and reintegration into the work force.

Prevention of high-pressure injection injuries to the hand

OBJECTIVES

To identify populations at high risk for, and the usual mechanisms of injury in, high-pressure injection injuries to the hand.

METHODS

A case note review of a historical cohort of 76 patients, presenting with high-pressure injections injuries to the hand over a 12-year period, collected information including sex, age, hand dominance, and occupation of the patient and mechanism of injury, when documented.

RESULTS

Eighty-two percent of these injuries were work-related, affecting mainly manual workers (84%), including 13 painters, 10 mechanics, 8 farmers, and 3 water blasters. The mechanism of injury, recorded in 63%, was most commonly a ruptured hose or inadvertent gun discharge during cleaning or use.

CONCLUSIONS

Preventative measures could include a targeted safety program for equipment users, engineering improvements in gun and hose design, economic incentives, and workplace legislation.

Flap reconstruction following high pressure injection injuries of the hand: a report of three cases

High pressure injection injuries are well known to cause significant injury to the hand, with high amputation rates and poor functional outcome. Surgical treatment consists of early aggressive debridement followed by secondary closure. Flap reconstruction is a reconstruction option which can increase the chance of digit salvage, as well as give an acceptable functional and cosmetic result. We review three cases of flap reconstruction following high pressure injection injuries, and discuss their role in the treatment of these injuries.

Veterinary pharmacovigilance. Part 4. Adverse reactions in humans to veterinary medicinal products

Although seemingly rare, adverse reactions to veterinary products do occur. These may arise from inadvertent exposure during use or as a result of occupational accidents. They are often mild in nature and include adverse effects such as minor skin reactions. However, more serious reactions may occur, and they are not restricted to the effects of the veterinary medicines themselves. For example, high-pressure injection injuries may occur as a result of accidents occurring during animal vaccination operations. This paper reviews some of these events, mentions where appropriate the regulatory actions taken, and describes some of the measures used to minimise such effects in the future, and serves to bring the issues discussed here to the attention of pharmacologists, pharmacoepidemiologists and others who train those who use veterinary medicinal products.

Evaluation of a cleanser for petroleum-contaminated skin

BACKGROUND

Extremity injuries contaminated with petroleum products pose clinical dilemmas. This project was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a dioctyl sulfosuccinate (DS) solution for cleansing petroleum-contaminated skin.

METHODS

One hundred Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to a contamination protocol followed by a cleansing procedure. Four petroleum contaminants and five cleansing solutions were selected. The protocol consisted of shaving, initial punch biopsy, contamination, precleansing punch biopsy, standardized scrub protocol, and postcleansing punch biopsy. Biopsy samples were analyzed for petroleum residue using fluorometry.

RESULTS

The 10% DS solution had the highest reduction of crude oil, grease, and tar: 99.6 +/- 0.4% (mean +/- SD) contaminant reduction for crude oil, 99.8 +/- 0.2% for grease, and 99.8 +/- 0.2% for tar. The other cleansers showed less efficacy (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Concentrated DS appears to be significantly more effective at cleaning petroleum products from skin than the commonly chosen surgical and commercial cleansers.